Screening for latent tuberculosis before tumour necrosis factor antagonist therapy

Impact of immunosuppressive and antifungal drugs on PBMC- and whole blood-based flow cytometric CD154+ Aspergillus fumigatus specific T-cell quantification

Flow cytometric quantification of CD154⁺ mould specific T-cells in antigen-stimulated peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) or whole blood has been described as a supportive biomarker to diagnose invasive mould infections and to monitor therapeutic outcomes. As patients at risk frequently receive immunosuppressive and antifungal medication, this study compared the matrix-dependent impact of representative drugs on CD154⁺ T-cell detection rates. PBMCs and whole blood samples from healthy adults were pre-treated with therapeutic concentrations of liposomal amphotericin B, voriconazole, posaconazole, cyclosporine A (CsA) or prednisolone. Samples were then stimulated with an Aspergillus fumigatus lysate or a viral antigen cocktail (CPI) and assessed for CD154⁺ T-helper cell frequencies. Specific T-cell detection rates and technical assay properties remained largely unaffected by exposure of both matrices to the studied antifungals. By contrast, CsA and prednisolone pre-treatment of isolated PBMCs and whole blood adversely impacted specific T-cell detection rates and caused elevated inter-replicate variation. Unexpectedly, the whole blood-based protocol that uses additional α-CD49d co-stimulation was less susceptible to CsA and prednisolone despite prolonged drug exposure in the test tube. Accordingly, addition of α-CD49d during PBMC stimulation partially attenuated the impact of immunosuppressive drugs on test performance. Translating these results into the clinical setting, false-negative results of CD154⁺ antigen-specific T-cell quantification need to be considered in patients receiving T-cell-active immunosuppressive medication. Optimized co-stimulation regimes with α-CD49d could contribute to an improved feasibility of functional T-cell assays in immunocompromised patient populations.

Biologic Agents and Tuberculosis

Treatment with biologic agents, in particular tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) inhibitors, is associated with an increased risk of tuberculosis (TB), and screening and treatment for latent TB infection (LTBI) in patients undergoing such treatment is therefore indicated. The risk of TB associated with different biologics varies significantly, with the highest relative risks, 29.3 and 18.6, associated with adalimumab and infliximab, respectively. The risk of TB with newer TNF-α inhibitors and other biologics appears to be lower. Performance of LTBI screening tests is affected by immune-mediated inflammatory diseases and immunosuppressive therapy in patients due to commence TNF-α inhibitor treatment. Interferon gamma release assays (IGRAs) have a higher specificity than the tuberculin skin test (TST) in patients with Bacillus Calmette–Guérin (BCG) vaccination and have probably a better sensitivity than TST in immunosuppressed patients. LTBI screening programs prior to commencement of anti-TNF-α treatment significantly reduce the incidence of TB, but the optimal screening algorithm, in particular the question of whether a combination of IGRA and TST or a single test only should be used, is a matter of ongoing debate. Use of TST in combination with IGRA is justified to increase sensitivity. Repeat testing for LTBI should be limited to patients at increased risk of TB. If TB develops during anti-TNF-α treatment, it is more likely to be disseminated and extrapulmonary than are other TB cases. Discontinuation of anti-TNF-α treatment in patients diagnosed with TB is associated with an increased risk of immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome, which is probably best managed by reintroduction of anti-TNF-α treatment.