Inhaled corticosteroids and the risk of a first exacerbation in COPD patients

Absolute Blood Eosinophil Counts to Guide Inhaled Corticosteroids Therapy Among Patients with COPD: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

The Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) 2019 recommends the use of absolute blood eosinophil count as a guide for the escalation and de-escalation of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) in the pharmacological management of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). We evaluated the risk of moderate or severe exacerbations among patients escalating and de-escalating ICS therapy by absolute blood eosinophil thresholds in this systematic review.

METHODS

Through a comprehensive literature search of Pubmed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, and clinical trial sites up to April 2019, we identified relevant studies. We used generic inverse variance method with fixed-effects estimates to compare the risk of moderate or severe exacerbations among COPD patients with elevated blood eosinophil counts exposed to inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) versus non-ICS treatments groups expressed as risk ratios.

RESULTS

Ten studies (8 randomised control trials and 2 observational studies) were included, with a total of 85,059 COPD patients. In our pooled analysis, we found an overall reduction in risk of moderate or severe exacerbations in patients with absolute blood eosinophil thresholds ranging from ≥ 100 to ≥ 340 cells/µL among patients escalating ICS (RR, 0.77, 95% CI, 0.73-0.81). For studies evaluating the effects of de-escalation of ICS on moderate to severe exacerbations using blood eosinophil thresholds of ≥ 300 to ≥ 340 cells/µL had an increased risk of moderate or severe exacerbations following the de-escalation of ICS (RR, 1.66, 95% CI, 1.31-2.10).

CONCLUSION

This study confirms the validity of the recommended absolute blood eosinophil count thresholds for the escalation and de-escalation of ICS among COPD patients. However, this recommendation is for COPD patients with prior exacerbations rather than among newly diagnosed COPD patients as observed in this study. COPD patients with current or past history of asthma represent a unique phenotypic group which should be further evaluated.

C-reactive protein as a biomarker of response to inhaled corticosteroids among patients with COPD

AIMS

C-reactive protein (CRP) is an important biomarker in systemic inflammation in COPD; reports have suggested inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) attenuate CRP levels. We evaluated the risk of moderate-to-severe exacerbations, severe exacerbations and all-cause mortality among patients with COPD currently exposed to Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) stratified by CRP levels compared to never ICS users with low CRP levels.

METHODS

We included subjects age 40 or more who had a diagnosis of COPD from January 1, 2005 to January 31, 2014 from the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD). ICS exposure was determined time-dependently, as current, recent, past or never users. We evaluated the risk of moderate-to-severe exacerbations, severe exacerbations and all-cause mortality among ICS users stratified by CRP levels.

RESULTS

17,722 subjects diagnosed with COPD met the inclusion criteria. Among current or never ICS with elevated CRP levels we found, no significantly reduced risk of moderate-to-severe or severe exacerbations. For patients currently exposed ICS with CRP levels ≥8 mg/L there was no reduced risk of moderate-to-severe exacerbations (adjusted hazard ratio [adj. HR] 0.99; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.76-1.31) or severe exacerbations (adj.HR 1.52; 95% CI 0.71-3.27). However, we found an increased risk of all-cause mortality among COPD patients with CRP levels ≥8 mg/L irrespective of ICS exposure.

CONCLUSION

We did not find a reduced risk of moderate and/or severe COPD exacerbations among COPD patients with varying CRP levels currently exposed to ICS. However, low-grade systemic inflammation was associated with all-cause mortality among COPD patients.

Blood Eosinophil Counts, Withdrawal of Inhaled Corticosteroids and Risk of COPD Exacerbations and Mortality in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD)

Although recently introduced in the pharmacological treatment algorithm of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), there is a need for more data supporting the use of blood eosinophil counts as a biomarker to guide inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) therapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the risk of moderate and/or severe exacerbations and all-cause mortality in a large primary care population after withdrawal of ICS compared to continued users stratified by elevated blood eosinophil counts. In this population based cohort study, we used data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) in the United Kingdom. We included subjects' aged 40 years or more who had a diagnosis of COPD. We excluded subjects with a history of asthma, pulmonary fibrosis, cardiac arrhythmia and bronchiectasis, COPD exacerbations occurring within 6 weeks prior to index date, or with a myocardial infarction within 3 months prior to index date. Continuous users were subjects who received their most recent ICS prescription within 3 months before the start of an interval. ICS withdrawals were those who discontinued ICS for more than 3 months. We evaluated the risk of moderate and/or severe exacerbations and all-cause mortality among subjects with various blood eosinophil thresholds who withdrew from ICS compared to continuous ICS users with elevated blood eosinophil levels using Cox regression analysis adjusted for potential confounders. We identified 48,157 subjects diagnosed with COPD between 1 January 2005 to 31 January 2014. Withdrawal of ICS was not associated with an increased risk of moderate-to-severe exacerbations among subjects with absolute blood eosinophil counts ≥0.34 × 10⁹ cells/L [adjusted hazard ratio (adj. HR) 0.72; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.63-0.81] or relative counts ≥ 4.0% (adj. HR 0.72; 95% CI: 0.66-0.78). Similarly, withdrawal of ICS was not associated with an increased risk of severe exacerbations among subjects with absolute blood eosinophil ≥0.34 × 10⁹ cells/L (adj. HR 0.82; 95% CI: 0.61-1.10) or relative blood eosinophil counts ≥4.0% (adj. HR 0.80; 95% CI: 0.61-1.04). No increased risk of all-cause mortality was observed among subjects who withdrew from ICS irrespective of elevated absolute or relative blood eosinophil counts. In a real-world primary care population, we did not observe an increased risk of moderate and/or severe COPD exacerbations or all-cause mortality among subjects with eosinophilia who withdrew their use of ICS.

Blood eosinophilia, use of inhaled corticosteroids, and risk of COPD exacerbations and mortality

PURPOSE

It remains unclear whether eosinophilia is useful for in guiding inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) therapy in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients. The goal of this study is to evaluate the risk of acute exacerbations, COPD-related hospitalisations/accident and emergency visits, and all-cause mortality with various levels of eosinophil counts among COPD patients using ICS.

METHODS

A cohort study was conducted using the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink. Patients were aged 40+ and had COPD (n = 32 693). Current users of ICS were stratified by relative and absolute eosinophil counts to determine the risk of outcomes with blood eosiniphilia using Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS

Among COPD patients, current use of ICS was not associated with a reduced risk of acute COPD exacerbations, COPD-related hospitalisations/accident and emergency visits, and all-cause mortality. Stratification of ICS use by absolute or relative eosinophil counts did not result in significant differences in risk of COPD exacerbations or hospitalisations/accident and emergency visits. However, all-cause mortality was reduced by 12% to 24% among patients with eosinophilia.

CONCLUSIONS

COPD-related acute exacerbations or hospitalisations/accident and emergency visits were not reduced with eosinophilia among users of ICS with COPD. However, all-cause mortality was reduced by 12% to 24%. These findings are potentially important and require further evaluation in prospective studies.

Observational Studies of Inhaled Corticosteroid Effectiveness in COPD: Lessons Learned

BACKGROUND

Randomized controlled trials at times investigate findings suggested by observational studies. For example, the Towards a Revolution in COPD Health (TORCH) trial, which did not show a mortality reduction with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) in COPD, was motivated by some observational studies that suggested considerable reductions in mortality with these drugs. Reasons for these discrepancies are unclear.

METHODS

The literature was searched to identify all observational studies, including cohort and case-control studies, investigating the effectiveness of ICS on major outcomes in patients with COPD; these outcomes included death and hospitalization for COPD.

RESULTS

A total of 21 studies were identified. Nine studies were affected by immortal time bias, five by immeasurable time bias, and seven by the "asthma factor" bias; some studies were affected by more than one bias. These studies found important reductions in the rates of major COPD outcomes with ICS use, with pooled rate ratios of 0.71 (95% CI, 0.67-0.76), 0.76 (95% CI, 0.70-0.83), and 0.79 (95% CI, 0.73-0.87), respectively, for the three sources of bias. In contrast, the five studies unaffected by these major biases did not find an association (pooled rate ratio, 1.02 [95% CI, 0.88-1.17]).

CONCLUSIONS

Observational studies are important to provide evidence from real-world data on medication effects. However, appropriate study design and analysis are essential to avoid biases and ensure randomized trials with greater chances of success. The observational studies suggesting potential beneficial effects of nonrespiratory drugs to treat COPD, such as statins and beta-blockers, will also need careful review before long and expensive randomized trials are conducted.

Severe exacerbation and pneumonia in COPD patients treated with fixed combinations of inhaled corticosteroid and long-acting beta2 agonist

BACKGROUND

It remains unclear whether severe exacerbation and pneumonia of COPD differs between patients treated with budesonide/formoterol and those treated with fluticasone/salmeterol. Therefore, we conducted a comparative study of those who used budesonide/formoterol and those treated with fluticasone/salmeterol for COPD.

METHODS

Subjects in this population-based cohort study comprised patients with COPD who were treated with a fixed combination of budesonide/formoterol or fluticasone/salmeterol. All patients were recruited from the Taiwan National Health Insurance database. The outcomes including severe exacerbations, pneumonia, and pneumonia requiring mechanical ventilation (MV) were measured.

RESULTS

During the study period, 11,519 COPD patients receiving fluticasone/salmeterol and 7,437 patients receiving budesonide/formoterol were enrolled in the study. Pairwise matching (1:1) of fluticasone/salmeterol and budesonide/formoterol populations resulted in to two similar subgroups comprising each 7,295 patients. Patients receiving fluticasone/salmeterol had higher annual rate and higher risk of severe exacerbation than patients receiving budesonide/formoterol (1.2219/year vs 1.1237/year, adjusted rate ratio, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.07-1.10). In addition, patients receiving fluticasone/salmeterol had higher incidence rate and higher risk of pneumonia than patients receiving budesonide/formoterol (12.11 per 100 person-years vs 10.65 per 100 person-years, adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.13; 95% CI, 1.08-1.20). Finally, patients receiving fluticasone/salmeterol had higher incidence rate and higher risk of pneumonia requiring MV than patients receiving budesonide/formoterol (3.94 per 100 person-years vs 3.47 per 100 person-years, aHR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.05-1.24). A similar trend was seen before and after propensity score matching analysis, intention-to-treat, and as-treated analysis with and without competing risk.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on this retrospective observational study, long-term treatment with fixed combination budesonide/formoterol was associated with fewer severe exacerbations, pneumonia, and pneumonia requiring MV than fluticasone/salmeterol in COPD patients.

The lag-time approach improved drug-outcome association estimates in presence of protopathic bias

OBJECTIVES

Protopathic bias is a systematic error which occurs when measured exposure status may be affected by the latent onset of the target outcome. In this article, we aimed to discuss the benefits and drawbacks of the lag-time approach to address this type of bias.

STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING

The lag-time approach consists in excluding from exposure assessment the period immediately preceding the outcome detection date. With the help of simple causal diagrams, we illustrate the rationale and limitations of such strategy. The lag-time approach was illustrated in a case-crossover study, based on the health care utilization databases of the Italian Lombardy Region, on the real-world effectiveness of some respiratory drugs (exposure) in preventing asthma exacerbations (outcome).

RESULTS

A total of 7,300 of patients who were admitted to an emergency department (ED) for asthma during 2010-2012 (cases) were included. Use (vs. nonuse) of short-acting beta-agonists (SABAs, an asthma reliever medication) during the 90 days before the ED admission date was associated with an increased risk of the outcome [odds ratio (OR): 1.95; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.72, 2.22]. This paradoxical finding may be explained by protopathic bias, as SABA use prior the ED admission may be affected by preceding respiratory distress. Indeed, when a 120-day period preceding the ED admission was ignored from drug exposure assessment (lag time), SABAs were found to be associated with a reduced risk of the outcome (OR: 0.81; 95% CI: 0.84, 0.92), as expected.

CONCLUSIONS

The lag-time approach can be a useful strategy to circumvent protopathic bias in observational studies.

Burden of Exacerbations in Patients with Moderate to Very Severe COPD in the Netherlands: A Real-life Study

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to compare rates of different types of acute exacerbations of COPD (AECOPDs) and healthcare utilization among patients with different severities of COPD.

METHODS

Data for this study was obtained from the PHARMO Database Network, which includes drug dispensing records from pharmacies, hospitalization records and information from general practitioners. Patients with moderate to very severe COPD (GOLD II-III-IV) and a moderate or severe AECOPD between 2000 and 2010 were included in the study. Moderate and severe AECOPDs were defined by drug use and hospitalizations respectively. Study patients were followed from the first AECOPD to end of registration in PHARMO, death or end of study period, whichever occurred first. During follow-up, all recurrent AECOPDs were characterized and healthcare utilization was assessed.

RESULTS

Of 886 patients in the study, 52% had GOLD-II, 34% GOLD-III and 14% had GOLD-IV. The overall AECOPD recurrence rate per person year (PY) increased from 0.63 for patients with GOLD-II to 1.09 for patients with GOLD-III and 1.33 for patients with GOLD-IV. The rate of severe AECOPD was 0.06, 0.14 and 0.17 per PY, respectively.

CONCLUSION

AECOPD recurrence rates and healthcare utilization are significantly higher among patients with more severe COPD.

Bronchodilator use and the risk of arrhythmia in COPD: part 2: reassessment in the larger Quebec cohort

BACKGROUND

A previous study suggested a potential increased risk of cardiac arrhythmia with new use of long-acting β-agonists and ipratropium bromide in patients with COPD, although conclusions were limited by the small cohort size.

METHODS

We reassessed this association in a larger cohort formed from the health-care databases of the province of Quebec, Canada. We identified a cohort of patients with COPD aged ≥ 67 years who began treatment between 1990 and 1999 and followed them until December 2003. A nested case-control approach matched each subject who developed severe arrhythmia during follow-up with 20 control subjects from the cohort on age, sex, and calendar time. The rate ratio (RR) of arrhythmia associated with new use of bronchodilators was estimated using conditional logistic regression, adjusting for COPD disease severity, cardiovascular disease, and other comorbidities.

RESULTS

The cohort included 76,661 patients with COPD, of whom 5,307 developed an arrhythmia (10.3 arrhythmias per 1,000 per year), 621 of which were fatal. The rate of cardiac arrhythmias was elevated with the new use of short-acting (RR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.03-1.57) and long-acting (RR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.01-2.15) β-agonists. The rate was slightly elevated, although not statistically significantly, with new use of ipratropium bromide (RR, 1.23; 95% CI, 0.95-1.57) and methylxanthines (RR, 1.28; 95% CI, 0.93-1.77). These effects waned with longer-term use.

CONCLUSIONS

New use of short- and long-acting β-agonists may slightly increase the risk of cardiac arrhythmia in patients with COPD. It remains unclear whether ipratropium bromide also increases this risk, despite the use of a larger study population.

Three-year dispensing patterns with long-acting inhaled drugs in COPD: a database analysis

BACKGROUND

Long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMA), long-acting β2-agonists (LABA) and fixed dose combinations (FDC) of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and LABA are used as inhaled maintenance therapies for COPD.

OBJECTIVE

To estimate persistence rates from dispensing patterns of long-acting inhaled drugs for COPD.

METHODS

From the PHARMO-database, COPD patients starting LAMA, LABA or LABA-ICS FDC between 2002 and 2006 were selected. Persistence with the initial as well as with any long-acting inhaled drug was determined, defined as time between start and stop of initial/any therapy, allowing ≤ 60-days gaps between refills. For patients who did not continue to receive dispensings of the initial therapy for at least one year, the first change in therapy was determined.

RESULTS

The study included 2201 LAMA, 1201 LABA and 4146 LABA-ICS FDC users. Persistence rates with initial therapy alone at 1, 2, and 3 years were 25%, 14%, 8% for LAMA, 21%, 10%, 6% for LABA and 27%, 14%, 8% for LABA-ICS FDC. Of patients who did not persist with LAMA alone for one year, 15% added and 13% switched therapy (both mostly LABA-ICS FDC). Of patients not persisting with LABA alone, 9% added therapy (mostly LAMA) and 31% switched therapy (mostly to LABA-ICS FDC). In patients not persisting with LABA-ICS FDC, add-on and switch occurred equally frequent (11%, mostly LAMA). Persistence rates with any long-acting drug at 1, 2 and 3 years were 36%, 23% and 17% respectively.

CONCLUSION

Persistence with the initial as well as with any long-acting inhaled drug in COPD is low, with a substantial proportion of patients changing therapy.

A new method for examining the cost savings of reducing COPD exacerbations

BACKGROUND

Some treatments for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) can reduce exacerbations, and thus could have a favourable impact on overall healthcare costs.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate a new method for assessing the potential cost savings of COPD controller medications based on the incidence of exacerbations and their related resource utilization in the general population.

METHODS

Patients with COPD (n = 1074) enrolled in a regional managed care system in the US were identified using administrative data and divided by their medication use into three groups (salbutamol, ipratropium and salmeterol). Exacerbations were captured using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Edition (ICD-9) and current procedural terminology (CPT) codes, then logistic regression models were created that described the risk of exacerbations for each comparator group and exacerbation type over a 6-month period. A Monte Carlo simulation was then applied 1000 times to provide the range of potential exacerbation reductions and cost consequences in response to a range of hypothetical examples of COPD controller medications.

RESULTS

Exacerbation events for each group could be modelled such that the events predicted by the Monte Carlo estimates were very close to the actual prevalences. The estimated cost per exacerbation avoided depended on the incidence of exacerbation in the various subpopulations, the assumed relative risk reduction, the projected daily cost for new therapy, and the costs of exacerbation treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

COPD exacerbation events can be accurately modelled from the healthcare utilization data of a defined cohort with sufficient accuracy for cost-effectiveness analysis. Treatments that reduce the risk or severity of exacerbations are likely to be cost effective among those patients who have frequent exacerbations and hospitalizations.

Assessing treatment effects of inhaled corticosteroids on medical expenses and exacerbations among COPD patients: longitudinal analysis of managed care claims

OBJECTIVE

To assess costs, effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) augmenting bronchodilator treatment for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

DATA SOURCES

Claims between 1997 and 2005 from a large managed care database.

STUDY DESIGN

Individual-level, fixed-effects regression models estimated the effects of initiating ICS on medical expenses and likelihood of severe exacerbation. Bootstrapping provided estimates of the incremental cost per severe exacerbation avoided.

DATA EXTRACTION METHODS

COPD patients aged 40 or older with > or = 15 months of continuous eligibility were identified. Monthly observations for 1 year before and up to 2 years following initiation of bronchodilators were constructed.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

ICS treatment reduced monthly risk of severe exacerbation by 25 percent. Total costs with ICS increased for 16 months, but declined thereafter. ICS use was cost saving 46 percent of the time, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $2,973 per exacerbation avoided; for patients > or = 50 years old, ICS was cost saving 57 percent of time.

CONCLUSIONS

ICS treatment reduces exacerbations, with an increase in total costs initially for the full sample. Compared with younger patients with COPD, patients aged 50 or older have reduced costs and improved outcomes. The estimated cost per severe exacerbation avoided, however, may be high for either group because of uncertainty as reflected by the large standard errors of the parameter estimates.

Canadian Thoracic Society recommendations for management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease - 2007 update

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a major respiratory illness in Canada that is both preventable and treatable. Our understanding of the pathophysiology of this complex condition continues to grow and our ability to offer effective treatment to those who suffer from it has improved considerably. The purpose of the present educational initiative of the Canadian Thoracic Society (CTS) is to provide up to date information on new developments in the field so that patients with this condition will receive optimal care that is firmly based on scientific evidence. Since the previous CTS management recommendations were published in 2003, a wealth of new scientific information has become available. The implications of this new knowledge with respect to optimal clinical care have been carefully considered by the CTS Panel and the conclusions are presented in the current document. Highlights of this update include new epidemiological information on mortality and prevalence of COPD, which charts its emergence as a major health problem for women; a new section on common comorbidities in COPD; an increased emphasis on the meaningful benefits of combined pharmacological and nonpharmacological therapies; and a new discussion on the prevention of acute exacerbations. A revised stratification system for severity of airway obstruction is proposed, together with other suggestions on how best to clinically evaluate individual patients with this complex disease. The results of the largest randomized clinical trial ever undertaken in COPD have recently been published, enabling the Panel to make evidence-based recommendations on the role of modern pharmacotherapy. The Panel hopes that these new practice guidelines, which reflect a rigorous analysis of the recent literature, will assist caregivers in the diagnosis and management of this common condition.

Impact of regular inhaled corticosteroid use on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease outcomes

Inhaled corticosteroids are often used to manage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, although the evidence regarding their long-term efficacy in preventing or reducing adverse health outcomes is not definitive. This retrospective cohort study analyzed whether regular inhaled corticosteroid use is associated with reduced health care utilization and all-cause mortality related to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Subjects were 2,902 health maintenance organization members aged 50 and over who met criteria for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The study used a composite endpoint of time to (1) death or (2) hospitalization or emergency room care related to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, whichever occurred first, during a 4-year follow-up. Among the 42% of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients with an indication of co-morbid asthma, inhaled corticosteroid use was associated with significantly reduced risk for both all-cause mortality and the composite outcome. The reduction in risk was greatest in never- and ex-smokers. Among chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients with no indication of asthma, inhaled corticosteroid use was associated with reduced risk only in never smokers. These findings generally persisted in separate analyses stratified by asthma status and in sensitivity analyses using four alternative definitions of regular medication use, with comparable results when regular medication use was treated as a fixed covariate defined at the start of follow-up. We conclude that use of inhaled corticosteroids was associated with reduced risk of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations and all-cause mortality. This benefit was most pronounced among never-smokers and in those with evidence of co-morbid asthma.

An appraisal of pharmacoeconomic evidence of maintenance therapy for COPD

COPD is projected to be the third-leading cause of death by the year 2020. Pharmacotherapy for COPD is palliative at best, having no impact on slowing the progression of the disease. The introduction of newer therapies such as long-acting forms of bronchodilator and anticholinergic agents, together with the inclusion of inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) in the recent Global Initiative for COPD therapeutic algorithm, have expanded the pharmacotherapy options for the treatment of COPD. This article provides a methodologic critique of the available pharmacoeconomic evidence on drug therapy for stable COPD in an effort to complement treatment guidelines and to identify any need for future pharmacoeconomic research. Relevant search strategies revealed a total of 28 economic evaluations of which 7 satisfied the study inclusion criteria. The Drummond 10-point checklist was used for the methodological critique of the economic evaluations. Five of seven pharmacoeconomic studies were conducted alongside a randomized controlled trial, and six of seven were cost-effectiveness analyses. Of the bronchodilators, the long-acting anticholinergic agent tiotropium is considered to be cost-effective relative to ipratropium. No conclusive information could be reached for the cost-effectiveness of long-acting beta-agonists. A Markov analysis showed ICSs to be cost-effective for patients with moderate-to-severe COPD relative to standard care. However, assumptions of the model may bias this conclusion, and additional studies are warranted, especially compared to other treatments. The authors suggest that additional pharmacoeconomic studies be conducted to assess the cost-effectiveness of long-acting beta-agonists and ICSs, between classes of bronchodilators, and between various combination therapies.

The role of combination therapy with corticosteroids and long-acting beta2-agonists in the prevention of exacerbations in COPD

Acute exacerbations of COPD can complicate the course of the disease in patients with severe airway obstruction. Reduction of exacerbations is an important clinical outcome in evaluating new therapies in COPD. Combination therapies with long-acting beta-agonists and inhaled corticosteroids have now been approved for use. Three 1-year randomized clinical trials, which studied the effect of combining a long-acting beta2-agonist with an inhaled corticosteroid in COPD, documented that exacerbation frequency was lower with therapy than placebo. Combination therapy had a similar effect to its monocomponents in the trial evaluating salmeterol/fluticasone combination. However, when patients with more severe COPD were studied using a combination of budesonide and formoterol, a clear improvement was seen in the overall exacerbation rates compared with the use of a long-acting beta2-agonist alone.

Safety of inhaled corticosteroids: room for improvement

Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are the standard of care in asthma and are widely used in the treatment of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. High-dose regimens and long-term use of ICS in predisposed individuals may be associated with a variety of side effects, similar to those observed with systemic corticosteroid therapy. Side effects associated with long-term ICS use include reduction in growth velocity, cataracts, glaucoma, osteoporosis, and fractures. Fear of unwanted complications may be of concern in all patients using ICS, particularly in age- and gender-specific populations that are more prone to develop side effects or to reduce treatment adherence because of physical, behavioral, or psychological problems. In addition to concerns about ICS safety, dosing regimens that are difficult to follow may further reduce a patient's ability to comply with treatment. Ciclesonide, a new-generation ICS with unique pharmacokinetic properties, was developed to provide effective anti-inflammatory control for asthma with once-daily administration to improve patient adherence and a high safety profile to reduce the occurrence of local and systemic side effects.