Glucocorticoid toxicity reduction with mepolizumab using the Glucocorticoid Toxicity Index

Predicting Risk of Morbidities Associated with Oral Corticosteroid Prescription for Asthma

Background

Oral corticosteroids (OCS) are commonly used to treat asthma but increase the risks for multiple morbidities; reducing OCS exposure may benefit patients. We analysed independent risk factors and longitudinal changes in OCS usage among patients with asthma to predict future risks of OCS-related adverse outcomes.

Methods

Optimum Patient Care Research Database United Kingdom primary care electronic medical records (EMR) from January 1990 to June 2021 were used to select adults (18-93 years) with asthma who had follow-up data from ≥2 years before to ≥3 years after an index visit for active symptoms; this date was defined by the largest pre-visit to post-visit change in mean annual OCS use. OCS usage during every follow-up year was categorised as none, low (mean <2 prescriptions/year), or high (mean ≥2 prescriptions/year). Pre-index to post-index changes between usage categories were calculated. Risk modelling selected cohorts without 17 morbidities (documented pre-index) reported to be associated with OCS exposure, including type 2 diabetes, osteoporosis, hypertension, and pneumonia. Cox regression analyses selected published risk factors associated with each condition and available in EMR for inclusion in proportional hazards models.

Results

The pre-index to post-index OCS usage category remained unchanged in 38.6% of patients, increased in 39.2%, and decreased in 22.2%, with 20.7% having no further OCS prescriptions. In models, the risks of all adverse outcomes increased with projected categoric OCS use; for example, hazard ratios for a one-category increment (none to low, low to high) were 1.55 (1.42-1.69) for type 2 diabetes, 1.56 (1.36-1.78) for post-menopausal osteoporosis, 1.05 (1.00-1.10) for hypertension, and 1.67 (1.52-1.83) for pneumonia (all p < 0.001).

Conclusion

OCS exposure in this primary care asthma population usually continued longitudinally. Our models predict increased risk of multiple morbidities with higher projected OCS exposure. These findings support early initiation of strategies to minimise OCS use in asthma.

Effectiveness of anti-IL-5/5Rα biologics in severe asthma in real-world studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Three biologics targeting interleukin 5 (anti-IL-5) or its receptor-α (anti-IL-5Rα) are approved for patients with severe asthma.

Methods

We systematically searched the literature published in Medline and Embase up to 1 May 2023 to identify observational studies and nonrandomised trials that assess the response to anti-IL-5/5Rα in real-life patients with severe eosinophilic asthma. We also performed random-effects meta-analyses.

Results

We identified 6401 studies, of which 92 with 9546 patients were analysed. Biologics use was associated with a 62% reduction in severe exacerbations (risk ratio 0.38, 95% CI 0.29-0.50) and a 54% reduction in hospitalisations (risk ratio 0.46, 95% CI 0.35-0.61) at 12 months of treatment, compared to pre-treatment. Biologics improved asthma control (decrease in asthma control questionnaire score by 1.11 points (95% CI -1.29--0.94) and increase in asthma control test score by 6.41 points (95% CI 5.66-7.16)) and increased the asthma quality of life questionnaire score by 1.08 points (95% CI 0.88-1.28) and forced expiratory volume in 1 s by 0.21 L (95% CI 0.15-0.27) at 12 months. There was a significant reduction in oral corticosteroids use of 51% (risk ratio 0.49, 95% CI 0.42-0.56), with a mean dose reduction of 6.01 mg·day-1 (95% CI -7.55--4.48) at 12 months of treatment. Similar findings were observed at 3-4, 6 and 24 months. A biomarker-related response to treatment was also noted.

Conclusions

This comprehensive meta-analysis summarises the significant clinical response to anti-IL-5/5Rα biologics in real-life studies, providing important insights for their use in clinical practice.

Prospective assessment of glucocorticoid toxicity in rheumatology practice: a focus on the glucocorticoid toxicity index

OBJECTIVE

The glucocorticoid toxicity index (GTI) is developed to measure glucocorticoid (GC)-related morbidity over time. This study aimed to assess GC-toxicity in patients at a rheumatology outpatient clinic by using the GTI and to identify the factors that interfere with the GTI.

METHODS

This prospective study included patients with inflammatory arthritis (IA), connective tissue disease and vasculitis who were newly prescribed GC-treatment (GC-naive) or have been still on GC-treatment for ≤2 years (GC-experienced). Patient demographics and disease characteristics, aggregate improvement score (GTI-AIS), cumulative worsening score (GTI-CWS) and cumulative GC-doses were recorded at baseline, 3rd month and 6th month. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) were used to evaluate the GTI scores and associated factors including cumulative GC-doses.

RESULTS

The study included 156 (48.7% GC-naive) patients with a mean age of 49.1 ± 17.1 years. More than half of the patients in both groups had a diagnosis of vasculitis. A higher cumulative GC-dose was found to be associated with higher GTI-scores in both groups (P < 0.001). In the GC-naive group, patients with vasculitis showed higher GTI-scores than IA patients (P < 0.001); there was also a significant increase in the GTI-CWS at the 6th month compared with the 3rd month. In the GC-experienced group, GTI-AIS and GTI-CWS were significantly different at 3rd and 6th month (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

It was shown that GTI scores were associated with cumulative GC-doses and vasculitis patients in the GC-naive patients had higher GTI scores than inflammatory arthritis. The GTI allows individualized assessment and management of adverse effects experienced by patients as a result of GC treatment.

Longitudinal Assessment of Glucocorticoid Toxicity Reduction in Patients With Severe Asthma Treated With Biologic Therapies

BACKGROUND

Toxicities associated with oral corticosteroids (OCS) are well described. Targeted biologics for severe asthma (SA) substantially reduce OCS exposure with the potential to reduce cumulative OCS-related toxicities. The Glucocorticoid Toxicity Index (GTI) systematically assesses OCS-related toxicity; the GTI Aggregate Improvement Score (AIS) is a bidirectional measure of total toxicity change with a minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of ≤-10.

OBJECTIVE

This study was a longitudinal assessment of patients with SA treated with biologic therapies to assess the trajectory of OCS-related toxicity and predictors of toxicity improvement.

METHODS

A total of 89 patients with SA had GTI assessments at baseline and after 1 and 3 years of biologic therapy.

RESULTS

At 3 years, daily prednisolone use continued to decrease (6.9 mg/day [4.0, 9.4] year 1 vs 0.8 mg/day [0.0, 3.7] year 3, P < .001), OCS-related toxicity continued to decline (AIS at 3 years -36 [-94, 19]), and 61% (54 of 89) met the AIS MCID. There was a significant positive correlation between toxicity outcomes at years 1 and 3 (ρ 0.65, P < .001). Nearly half (49%) met the AIS MCID at both years 1 and 3, but 29% of the cohort did not meet the AIS MCID at either time point. Toxicity change at year 1 was predictive of toxicity change at year 3 for 79%. Toxicity reduction was not proportional to OCS reduction; there were no prebiologic characteristics that predicted toxicity reduction.

CONCLUSIONS

After 3 years of biologic treatment, 61% of patients with SA had clinically significant toxicity improvement. Individual toxicity outcomes at year 1 are associated with longitudinal outcomes, suggesting that for some, additional interventions are needed alongside OCS reduction to decrease morbidity.

Expert consensus on oral corticosteroids stewardship for the treatment of severe asthma in the Middle East and Africa

In the Middle East and Africa (MEA) region, overuse of oral corticosteroids (OCS) for asthma management, both as burst and maintenance therapy, poses a significant challenge. Gaps in knowledge regarding the need to taper OCS in patients with severe asthma and the use of OCS in comorbid conditions have been noted. OCS stewardship can help attain optimal and effective OCS tapering along with reducing OCS overuse and over-reliance. In this paper, we discuss current practices regarding the use of OCS in asthma, globally and in the MEA region. Expert recommendations for achieving OCS stewardship in the MEA region have also been presented. Regional experts recommend increasing awareness among patients about the consequences of OCS overuse, engaging community pharmacists, and educating primary healthcare professionals about the benefits of prompt appropriate referral. Innovative local referral tools like ReferID can be utilized to refer patients with asthma to specialist care. The experts also endorse a multidisciplinary team approach and accelerating access to newer medicines like biologics to implement OCS stewardship and optimize asthma care in the MEA region.

Barriers to clinical remission in severe asthma

Severe asthma is associated with an increased risk for exacerbations, reduced lung function, fixed airflow obstruction, and substantial morbidity and mortality. The concept of remission in severe asthma as a new treatment goal has recently gained attention due to the growing use of monoclonal antibody therapies, which target specific pathologic pathways of inflammation. This review evaluates the current definitions of asthma remission and unveils some of the barriers for achieving this state in the severe asthma population. Although there is no unified definition, the concept of clinical remission in asthma should be based on a sustained period of symptom control, elimination of oral corticosteroid exposure and exacerbations, and stabilization of pulmonary function. The conjugation of these criteria seems a realistic treatment target in a minority of asthmatic patients. Some unmet needs in severe asthma may affect the achievement of clinical remission. Late intervention with targeted therapies in the severe asthma population may increase the risk of corticosteroid exposure and the development of irreversible structural airway changes. Moreover, airway infection is an important component in persistent exacerbations in patients on biologic therapies. Phenotyping exacerbations may be useful to guide therapy decisions and to avoid the liberal use of oral corticosteroids. Another challenge associated with the aim of clinical remission in severe asthma is the multifaceted interaction between the disease and its associated comorbidities. Behavioural factors should be evaluated in case of persistent symptoms despite optimised treatment, and assessing biomarkers and targeting treatable traits may allow for a more objective way of reaching remission. The concept of clinical remission will benefit from an international consensus to establish unifying criteria for its assessment, and it should be addressed in the future management guidelines.

Withdrawal of immunosuppressants and low-dose steroids in patients with stable IgG4-RD (WInS IgG4-RD): an investigator-initiated, multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial

OBJECTIVES

IgG4-related disease (IgG4-RD) is an immune-mediated, fibroinflammatory disease. Induction treatment with glucocorticoid (GC) is usually effective, but its tendency of relapse makes the strategy for maintenance treatment a challenge. The WInS IgG4-RD (withdraw immunosuppressants (IMs) and steroid in stable IgG4-RD) trial tested whether discontinuation of GC and IM was feasible in stable IgG4-RD.

METHODS

The WInS IgG4-RD trial was a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Patients with IgG4-RD receiving GC+IM as maintenance treatment with clinically quiescent disease for at least 12 months were randomised (1:1:1) into three groups: group 1: withdraw GC+IM; group 2: withdraw GC but maintain IM; group 3: maintain GC+IM. The primary outcome was the relapse rate of disease within 18 months. The secondary outcomes included the changes of IgG4-RD Responder Index (RI), Physician's Global Assessment (PGA), serum IgG4 and IgG, as well as adverse events.

RESULTS

One hundred and forty-six patients were randomised, with 48 patients in group 1, 49 patients in group 2 and group 3, respectively. Within the 18-month follow-up period, disease relapse occurred in 25 out of 48 (52.1%) patients in group 1 vs 7 out of 49 (14.2%) in group 2 and 6 out of 49 (12.2%) in group 3 (p<0.001). The changes in RI and PGA were significantly higher in group 1 than in group 2 (p<0.001) or group 3 (p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The maintenance of IMs, with or without low-dose GC, was found to be superior to withdraw GC+IM in preventing relapse for long-time stable IgG4-RD.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04124861.

Qualitative interviews to support development of a patient-reported companion measure to the Glucocorticoid Toxicity Index

INTRODUCTION

Glucocorticoids (GCs) are associated with multiple toxicities that have substantial impact on patients. We conducted qualitative interviews with patients to identify the toxicities that are most relevant from their perspective, with the goal of creating a patient-reported companion measure to the Glucocorticoid Toxicity Index (GTI), a clinician-facing instrument.

METHODS

Thirty-one patients with recent or current GC use participated in concept elicitation interviews. Participants received GC treatment for myasthenia gravis, chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy, vasculitis, or systemic lupus erythematosus. Transcripts were coded following a thematic analysis approach.

RESULTS

Participants reported more than 100 toxicities they believed to be associated with their GC medications. Common toxicities included weight gain (87%), increased appetite (84%), insomnia/sleep problems (77%), cognitive impairment/brain fog (71%), easy bruising (68%), anxiety (65%), irritability/short temper (65%), and osteoporosis (39%). These toxicities often centered on self-esteem, neuropsychiatric effects, skin toxicities, and musculoskeletal function. They can be categorized into domains such emphasizing neuropsychiatric, metabolic/endocrine, musculoskeletal, and dermatological effects, highlighting aspects of GC toxicity that patients are uniquely positioned to appreciate and report.

CONCLUSION

Our results confirm that the toxicities associated with GCs are pervasive and diverse, with substantial impact on patients' lives. These data will be used to inform the development of a patient-reported outcome measure assessing GC toxicity. This patient-reported instrument will be designed to complement the clinician-reported GTI, facilitating a more detailed understanding of the nuances of change in GC toxicity.

Prospective study of complications and sequelae of glucocorticoid therapy in ANCA-associated vasculitis

OBJECTIVE

Glucocorticoids (GC) are a cornerstone in treating antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies-associated vasculitides (AAV), however, they add to morbidity and mortality. To date, GC toxicity in AAV has rarely been systematically investigated.

METHODS

Patients with a confirmed AAV were included in this monocentric prospective study. GC toxicity was assessed by structured interviews, clinical examination and electronic medical record analysis. The Glucocorticoid Toxicity Index (GTI) consisting of the Aggregate Improvement Score (GTI-AIS) and the Cumulative Worsening Score (GTI-CWS) was assessed at two time points (t1 baseline, t2 6 months later). We used regression analyses to assess the relationship between GTI and GC exposure, toxicity, and disease activity, and a receiver operating characteristic analysis to calculate a GC threshold dose beyond which toxicity is expected to occur.

RESULTS

We included 138 patients with AAV. The median cumulative GC dose was 9014.0 mg. The most frequent adverse events were skin atrophy, osteoporosis and myopathy. GC exposure and toxicity were significantly correlated (p<0.001). GTI-AIS was significantly higher in active disease compared with patients in remission (p<0.001). GTI-CWS scored significantly higher in long-standing diseases (p=0.013) with high cumulative GC doses (p=0.003). Patients with a cumulative GC dose of 935 mg or more showed an 80% likelihood for a clinically meaningful change in GTI scoring.

CONCLUSION

The GTI is capable of capturing GC toxicity in AAV and identifies patients at increased risk for GC side effects. Our data support efforts to limit GC exposure in patients with AAV.

Impact of Initiating Biologics in Patients With Severe Asthma on Long-Term Oral Corticosteroids or Frequent Rescue Steroids (GLITTER): Data From the International Severe Asthma Registry

BACKGROUND

Effectiveness of biologics has neither been established in patients with high oral corticosteroid exposure (HOCS) nor been compared with effectiveness of continuing with HOCS alone.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the effectiveness of initiating biologics in a large, real-world cohort of adult patients with severe asthma and HOCS.

METHODS

This was a propensity score-matched, prospective cohort study using data from the International Severe Asthma Registry. Between January 2015 and February 2021, patients with severe asthma and HOCS (long-term OCSs for ≥1 year or ≥4 courses of rescue OCSs within a 12-month period) were identified. Biologic initiators were identified and, using propensity scores, matched 1:1 with noninitiators. The impact of biologic initiation on asthma outcomes was assessed using generalized linear models.

RESULTS

We identified 996 matched pairs of patients. Both groups improved over the 12-month follow-up period, but improvement was greater for biologic initiators. Biologic initiation was associated with a 72.9% reduction in the average number of exacerbations per year versus noninitiators (0.64 vs 2.06; rate ratio, 0.27 [95% CI, 0.10-0.71]). Biologic initiators were 2.2 times more likely than noninitiators to take a daily long-term OCS dose of less than 5 mg (risk probability, 49.6% vs 22.5%; P = .002) and had a lower risk of asthma-related emergency department visits (relative risk, 0.35 [95% CI, 0.21-0.58]; rate ratio, 0.26 [0.14-0.48]) and hospitalizations (relative risk, 0.31 [95% CI, 0.18-0.52]; rate ratio, 0.25 [0.13-0.48]).

CONCLUSIONS

In a real-world setting, including patients with severe asthma and HOCS from 19 countries, and within an environment of clinical improvement, initiation of biologics was associated with further improvements across multiple asthma outcomes, including exacerbation rate, OCS exposure, and health care resource utilization.

The Glucocorticoid Toxicity Index-Metabolic Domains, an abridged version of the Glucocorticoid Toxicity Index: post-hoc analysis of data from the ADVOCATE trial

BACKGROUND

Quantifying glucocorticoid toxicity is crucial to efforts to reduce it. The Glucocorticoid Toxicity Index (GTI) measures toxicity effectively in clinical trials by calculating two scores: the cumulative worsening score (CWS) and the aggregate improvement score (AIS). However, in clinical practice, high patient volumes limit the time available for standardised assessments. We aimed to compare the GTI with an abbreviated version of the GTI, the GTI-Metabolic Domains (GTI-MD), which could help to address this issue by using data that are collected easily at routine visits and do not require additional effort from clinicians.

METHODS

We did a post-hoc analysis of data from ADVOCATE, a randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, phase 3 trial in which avacopan replaced a standard prednisone taper in patients with antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis. We calculated the cumulative worsening score (CWS) and aggregate improvement score (AIS) for each domain of the GTI-MD-comprising the BMI, glucose tolerance, blood pressure, and lipid metabolism domains of the GTI-to test its ability to differentiate the avacopan and prednisone groups by glucocorticoid toxicity. Data from two additional disease cohorts, one comprising patients with asthma and the other comprising patients with autoimmune blistering disease, constituted the validation set.

FINDINGS

Complete data were available for 321 (97%) of the 330 participants comprising the intention-to-treat population in the ADVOCATE trial at week 13, and 307 (93%) at week 26; data from these individuals were included in our post-hoc analysis. In ADVOCATE, 98 (59%) of 166 participants in the avacopan group were men and 68 (41%) were women, 88 (54%) of 164 in the prednisone group were men and 76 (46%) were women; the mean age of participants was 61·2 years [SD 14·6] in the avacopan group and 60·5 years [14·5] in the prednisone group. The validation cohort included 159 patients (89 with glucocorticoid-dependent asthma, of whom 40 [45%] were men and 49 [55%] were women, and 70 with autoimmune blistering disease of the skin, of whom 30 [43%] were men and 40 [57%] were women). The Spearman's rank correlation coefficient in ADVOCATE for the GTI-MD CWS with the GTI CWS for the treatment groups combined was 0·78 (95% CI 0·75-0·81; p<0·0001). The corresponding correlation for the AIS was 0·73 (0·69-0·77, p<0·0001). The GTI-MD distinguished the groups by glucocorticoid toxicity at both 13 weeks and 26 weeks. The mean GTI-MD CWS was lower in the avacopan group than in the prednisone group, consistent with less toxicity (15·9 vs 23·0 at 13 weeks [p=0·0010]; 26·7 vs 31·7 at 26 weeks [p=0·0092]). The GTI-MD AIS values were also consistent with less toxicity in the avacopan group (2·5 vs 13·0 at 13 weeks [p=0·0003], 4·4 vs 10·1 at 26 weeks [p=0·027]). A GTI-MD score of 0 corresponded to a low likelihood of toxicity in the other GTI domains. In the validation set, the Spearman's rank correlation coefficient for the GTI-MD CWS with the GTI CWS was 0·61 (95% CI 0·50-0·70; p<0·0001) and the corresponding correlation for the AIS was 0·58 (0·47-0·68; p<0·0001).

INTERPRETATION

The GTI-MD correlates well with the full GTI and could be incorporated readily into routine clinic workflows without additional input from the clinician. Using the GTI-MD on the background of electronic medical records systems could help clinicians to monitor glucocorticoid toxicity longitudinally, with the goals of preventing the burden of chronic, treatment-related harms and reducing long-term costs to health systems.

FUNDING

ChemoCentryx.

Cost-Effectiveness of Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide Suppression Testing as an Adherence Screening Tool Among Patients With Difficult-to-Control Asthma

BACKGROUND

Approximately 50% of adults on long-term asthma medication are nonadherent. Current methods to detect nonadherence have had limited effect. Fractional exhaled nitric oxide suppression testing (FeNOSuppT) has demonstrated clinical effectiveness as an adherence screening tool to detect poor adherence to inhaled corticosteroids in difficult-to-control asthma prior to initiation of expensive biologic therapy.

OBJECTIVE

Estimate the cost effectiveness and budget impact of FeNOSuppT as a screen prior to the initiation of biologic therapy among U.S. adults with difficult-to-control asthma and high fractional exhaled nitric oxide (≥45 ppb).

METHODS

A decision tree simulated the progression of a cohort of patients over a 1-year time horizon into 1 of 3 states ([1] discharged from or [2] remain in specialist care; or [3] progress to biologics). Two strategies, with and without FeNOSuppT, were examined and the incremental net monetary benefit estimated using a discount rate of 3% and a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY). Sensitivity analysis and a budget impact analysis were also undertaken.

RESULTS

In the baseline scenario, FeNOSuppT prior to the initiation of biologic therapy was associated with lower costs ($4,435/patient) and fewer QALYs (0.0023 QALY/patient) compared with no FeNOSuppT over 1 year and was considered cost effective (incremental net monetary benefit = $4,207). The FeNOSuppT was consistently found to be cost effective across a range of scenarios and in deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. Assuming differential levels of FeNOSuppT uptake (20%-100%), this was associated with budget savings ranging from USD $5 million to $27 million.

CONCLUSIONS

The FeNOSuppT is likely to be cost effective as a protocol-driven, objective, biomarker-based tool for identifying nonadherence in difficult-to-control asthma. This cost effectiveness is driven by cost savings from patients not progressing to expensive biologic therapy.

Glucocorticoid Toxicity Index scores by domain in patients with antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis treated with avacopan versus standard prednisone taper: post-hoc analysis of data from the ADVOCATE trial

BACKGROUND

The ADVOCATE trial, in which the complement C5a receptor inhibitor avacopan was compared with a standard prednisone taper in patients with antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis, used the Glucocorticoid Toxicity Index (GTI) to measure glucocorticoid toxicity change. We set out to do a post-hoc analysis of the ADVOCATE data to evaluate changes in individual GTI domains and their ability to differentiate treatment groups.

METHODS

The ADVOCATE trial was a phase 3, double-blind, double-dummy, randomised trial comparing oral avacopan (30 mg) twice daily for 52 weeks plus a prednisone-matching placebo for 20 weeks with oral prednisone tapered over 20 weeks plus an avacopan-matching placebo for 52 weeks in patients with ANCA-associated vasculitis. GTI data were collected within each of the included domains (BMI, blood pressure, glucose tolerance, lipid metabolism, glucocorticoid myopathy, skin toxicity, neuropsychiatric effects, and infections) at baseline, 13 weeks, and 26 weeks. In this post-hoc analysis, we calculated the cumulative worsening score (CWS) and aggregate improvement score (AIS) for each GTI domain, assessed to what extend each domain contributed to the GTI score, and which domains differentiated between the avacopan and prednisone groups. Differences in domain scores between the two groups were compared using Mantel-Haenszel χ2 tests.

FINDINGS

Among the 330 patients included in the intention-to-treat population of the ADVOCATE trial, 321 (97%) had complete data at week 13 (160 in the avacopan group, and 161 in the prednisone group), and 307 (93%) had complete data at week 26 (154 in the avacopan group, and 153 in the prednisone group) and were assessed in this post-hoc study. In ADVOCATE, mean age in both groups was 61 years (61·2 years [SD 14·6] in the avacopan group; 60·5 years [14·5] in the prednisone group); 98 (59%) of 166 patients in the avacopan group were men and 68 (41%) were women; 88 (54%) of 164 patients in the prednisone group were men and 76 (46%) were women. 278 (84%) of 330 patients were White. The mean glucocorticoid use over 26 weeks was lower in the avacopan group than the prednisone group (1073 mg [SD 1669] vs 3192 mg [1174]). Significantly less glucocorticoid toxicity was observed in the avacopan group than the prednisone group by week 13 in four domains of the GTI (BMI, glucose tolerance, lipid metabolism, and skin toxicity), based on both the CWS and AIS. CWS values in the BMI, lipid metabolism, and skin toxicity domains were significantly lower in the avacopan group than the prednisone group at 26 weeks. No domain favoured the prednisone group for glucocorticoid toxicity reduction. 280 (91%) of 307 patients had glucocorticoid toxicity at 26 weeks. Blood pressure (35% in the avacopan group vs 25% in the prednisone group), infection (22% vs 24%), and lipid metabolism (20% vs 15%) contributed the most weight toward CWS values at 26 weeks. 128 (42%) of 307 patients had combinations of improvement and worsening in different domains at 26 weeks.

INTERPRETATION

Replacing a standard prednisone taper with avacopan in patients with ANCA-associated vasculitis reduced glucocorticoid toxicity in multiple GTI domains. For individual patients, glucocorticoid toxicity was often nuanced, improving in some domains while worsening in others. These findings emphasise the value of a composite measure of glucocorticoid toxicity that quantifies cumulative worsening and aggregate change directly.

FUNDING

ChemoCentryx.

Oral corticosteroid-sparing effects of mepolizumab in severe eosinophilic asthma: evidence from randomized controlled trials and real-world studies

Oral corticosteroids (OCS) have long been a mainstay of treatment for asthma exacerbations and chronic severe asthma. However, it is increasingly recognized that both long-term and short-term OCS use are directly associated with a wide range of serious adverse effects, and as such OCS-sparing treatment alternatives are now widely recommended for patients with severe asthma. While several international guidelines recommend these treatments, guidance on OCS tapering, and which patients are most likely to tolerate OCS reduction and/or discontinuation, is still lacking. Several biologics have demonstrated efficacy in patients with OCS-dependent asthma. One OCS-sparing treatment is the anti-interleukin-5 monoclonal antibody mepolizumab, which is approved for the treatment of severe eosinophilic asthma. In addition to improved exacerbation rates, asthma control, quality of life, and lung function among patients with severe eosinophilic asthma, mepolizumab also has an OCS-sparing effect, which has been demonstrated in randomized controlled trials and real-world studies. Both physicians and patients express concerns about the adverse effects of OCS, and additional data from the randomized, controlled SIRIUS trial (NCT01691508) highlight the high level of concern among patients regarding OCS-related burden. In this article, we discuss current guidance on OCS-sparing strategies for patients with severe asthma, provide a summary of the available evidence of the OCS-sparing effect of mepolizumab, and highlight patient and physician perspectives on the use of OCS and OCS-sparing treatments in severe asthma.