A contemporary practical approach to the multidisciplinary management of unclassifiable interstitial lung disease

Clinical Impact of Telomere Length Testing for Interstitial Lung Disease

BACKGROUND

Shortened telomere length (TL) is a genomic risk factor for fibrotic interstitial lung disease (ILD), but its role in clinical management is unknown.

RESEARCH QUESTION

What is the clinical impact of TL testing on the management of ILD?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Patients were evaluated in the Columbia University ILD clinic and underwent Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments-certified TL testing by flow cytometry and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FlowFISH) as part of clinical treatment. Short TL was defined as below the 10th age-adjusted percentile for either granulocytes or lymphocytes by FlowFISH. Patients were offered genetic counseling and testing if they had short TL or a family history of ILD. FlowFISH TL was compared with research quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) TL measurement.

RESULTS

A total of 108 patients underwent TL testing, including those with clinical features of short telomere syndrome such as familial pulmonary fibrosis (50%) or extrapulmonary manifestations in the patient (25%) or a relative (41%). The overall prevalence of short TL was 46% and was similar across clinical ILD diagnoses. The number of short telomere clinical features was independently associated with detecting short TL (OR, 2.00; 95% CI, 1.27-3.32). TL testing led to clinical treatment changes for 35 patients (32%), most commonly resulting in reduction or avoidance of immunosuppression. Of the patients who underwent genetic testing (n = 34), a positive or candidate diagnostic finding in telomere-related genes was identified in 10 patients (29%). Inclusion of TL testing below the 1st percentile helped reclassify eight of nine variants of uncertain significance into actionable findings. The quantitative polymerase chain reaction test correlated with FlowFISH, but age-adjusted percentile cutoffs may not be equivalent between the two assays.

INTERPRETATION

Incorporating TL testing in ILD impacted clinical management and led to the discovery of new actionable genetic variants.

Correlation between CT-based phenotypes and serum biomarker in interstitial lung diseases

BACKGROUND

The quantitative analysis of computed tomography (CT) and Krebs von den Lungen-6 (KL-6) serum level has gained importance in the diagnosis, monitoring, and prognostication of interstitial lung disease (ILD). However, the associations between quantitative analysis of CT and serum KL-6 level remain poorly understood.

METHODS

In this retrospective observational study conducted at tertiary hospital between June 2020 and March 2022, quantitative analysis of CT was performed using the deep learning-based method including reticulation, ground glass opacity (GGO), honeycombing, and consolidation. We investigated the associations between CT-based phenotypes and serum KL-6 measured within three months of the CT scan. Furthermore, we evaluated the performance of the combined CT-based phenotypes and KL-6 levels in predicting hospitalizations due to respiratory reasons of ILD patients.

RESULTS

A total of 131 ILD patients (104 males) with a median age of 67 years were included in this study. Reticulation, GGO, honeycombing, and consolidation extents showed a positive correlation with KL-6 levels. [Reticulation, correlation coefficient (r) = 0.567, p < 0.001; GGO, r = 0.355, p < 0.001; honeycombing, r = 0.174, p = 0.046; and consolidation, r = 0.446, p < 0.001]. Additionally, the area under the ROC of the combined reticulation and KL-6 for hospitalizations due to respiratory reasons was 0.810 (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Quantitative analysis of CT features and serum KL-6 levels ascertained a positive correlation between the two. In addition, the combination of reticulation and KL-6 shows potential for predicting hospitalizations of ILD patients due to respiratory causes. The combination of reticulation, focusing on phenotypic change in lung parenchyma, and KL-6, as an indicator of lung injury extent, could be helpful for monitoring and predicting the prognosis of various types of ILD.

Correlation of CT-based radiomics analysis with pathological cellular infiltration in fibrosing interstitial lung diseases

PURPOSE

We aimed to identify computed tomography (CT) radiomics features that are associated with cellular infiltration and construct CT radiomics models predictive of cellular infiltration in patients with fibrotic ILD.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

CT images of patients with ILD who underwent surgical lung biopsy (SLB) were analyzed. Radiomics features were extracted using artificial intelligence-based software and PyRadiomics. We constructed a model predicting cell counts in histological specimens, and another model predicting two classifications of higher or lower cellularity. We tested these models using external validation.

RESULTS

Overall, 100 patients (mean age: 62 ± 8.9 [standard deviation] years; 61 men) were included. The CT radiomics model used to predict cell count in 140 histological specimens predicted the actual cell count in 59 external validation specimens (root-mean-square error: 0.797). The two-classification model's accuracy was 70% and the F1 score was 0.73 in the external validation dataset including 30 patients.

CONCLUSION

The CT radiomics-based model developed in this study provided useful information regarding the cellular infiltration in the ILD with good correlation with SLB specimens.

Interdisciplinary Diagnosis and Management of Patients With Interstitial Lung Disease and Connective Tissue Disease

A diagnosis of interstitial lung diseases (ILD) can be challenging, and the identification of an associated connective tissue disease (CTD) is crucial to estimate prognosis and to establish the optimal treatment approach. Diagnostic delay, limited expertise, and fragmented care are barriers that impede the delivery of comprehensive health care for patients with rare, complex, and multiorgan diseases such as CTD and ILD. In this article, we present our perspective on the interdisciplinary diagnosis and interprofessional treatment of patients with ILD and suspected CTD or CTD at risk of ILD. We outline the structure of our service, delineating the roles and responsibilities of the team members. Additionally, we provide an overview of our patient population, including diagnostic approaches and specific treatments, and illustrate a patient case. Furthermore, we focus on specific benefits and challenges of joint interdisciplinary and interprofessional patient consultations. The importance of rheumatology and pulmonology assessments in specific patient populations is emphasized. Finally, we explore future directions and discuss potential strategies to improve care delivery for patients with CTD-associated ILD.

Pulmonary fibrosis: from pathogenesis to clinical decision-making

Pulmonary fibrosis (PF) encompasses a spectrum of chronic lung diseases that progressively impact the interstitium, resulting in compromised gas exchange, breathlessness, diminished quality of life (QoL), and ultimately respiratory failure and mortality. Various diseases can cause PF, with their underlying causes primarily affecting the lung interstitium, leading to their referral as interstitial lung diseases (ILDs). The current understanding is that PF arises from abnormal wound healing processes triggered by various factors specific to each disease, leading to excessive inflammation and fibrosis. While significant progress has been made in understanding the molecular mechanisms of PF, its pathogenesis remains elusive. This review provides an in-depth exploration of the latest insights into PF pathophysiology, diagnosis, treatment, and future perspectives.

Occupational interstitial lung diseases

Millions of workers are exposed to substances known to cause occupational interstitial lung diseases (ILDs), particularly in developing countries. However, the burden of the disease is likely to be underestimated due to under-recognition, under-reporting or both. The diagnosis of occupational ILD requires a high level of suspicion and a thorough occupational history, as occupational and non-occupational ILDs may be clinically, functionally and radiologically indistinguishable, leading to delayed diagnosis and inappropriate management. A potential occupational aetiology should always be considered in the differential diagnosis of ILD, as removal from the workplace exposure, with or without treatment, is a key therapeutic intervention and may lead to significant improvement. In this article, we provide an overview of the 'traditional' inorganic dust-related ILDs but also address idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and the immunologically mediated chronic beryllium disease, sarcoidosis and hypersensitivity pneumonitis, with emphasis on the importance of surveillance and prevention for reducing the burden of these conditions. To this end, health-care professionals should be specifically trained about the importance of occupational exposures as a potential cause of ILD.

Recent Advancements in Computed Tomography Assessment of Fibrotic Interstitial Lung Diseases

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a heterogeneous group of disorders with complex and varied imaging manifestations and prognosis. High-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) is the current standard-of-care imaging tool for ILD assessment. However, visual evaluation of HRCT is limited by interobserver variation and poor sensitivity for subtle changes. Such challenges have led to tremendous recent research interest in objective and reproducible methods to examine ILDs. Computer-aided CT analysis to include texture analysis and machine learning methods have recently been shown to be viable supplements to traditional visual assessment through improved characterization and quantification of ILDs. These quantitative tools have not only been shown to correlate well with pulmonary function tests and patient outcomes but are also useful in disease diagnosis, surveillance and management. In this review, we provide an overview of recent computer-aided tools in diagnosis, prognosis, and longitudinal evaluation of fibrotic ILDs, while outlining some of the pitfalls and challenges that have precluded further advancement of these tools as well as potential solutions and further endeavors.

Clinical Guidance on the Monitoring and Management of Trastuzumab Deruxtecan (T-DXd)-Related Adverse Events: Insights from an Asia-Pacific Multidisciplinary Panel

Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd)-an antibody-drug conjugate targeting the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-improved outcomes of patients with HER2-positive and HER2-low metastatic breast cancer. Guidance on monitoring and managing T-DXd-related adverse events (AEs) is an emerging unmet need as translating clinical trial experience into real-world practice may be difficult due to practical and cultural considerations and differences in health care infrastructure. Thus, 13 experts including oncologists, pulmonologists and a radiologist from the Asia-Pacific region gathered to provide recommendations for T-DXd-related AE monitoring and management by using the latest evidence from the DESTINY-Breast trials, our own clinical trial experience and loco-regional health care considerations. While subgroup analysis of Asian (excluding Japanese) versus overall population in the DESTINY-Breast03 uncovered no major differences in the AE profile, we concluded that proactive monitoring and management are essential in maximising the benefits with T-DXd. As interstitial lung disease (ILD)/pneumonitis is a serious AE, patients should undergo regular computed tomography scans, but the frequency may have to account for the median time of ILD/pneumonitis onset and access. Trastuzumab deruxtecan appears to be a highly emetic regimen, and prophylaxis with serotonin receptor antagonists and dexamethasone (with or without neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist) should be considered. Health care professionals should be vigilant for treatable causes of fatigue, and patients should be encouraged to use support groups and practice low-intensity exercises. To increase treatment acceptance, patients should be made aware of alopecia risk prior to starting T-DXd. Detailed monitoring and management recommendations for T-DXd-related AEs are discussed further.

Treatable traits: a comprehensive precision medicine approach in interstitial lung disease

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a diverse group of inflammatory and fibrotic lung conditions causing significant morbidity and mortality. A multitude of factors beyond the lungs influence symptoms, health-related quality of life, disease progression and survival in patients with ILD. Despite an increasing emphasis on multidisciplinary management in ILD, the absence of a framework for assessment and delivery of comprehensive patient care poses challenges in clinical practice. The treatable traits approach is a precision medicine care model that operates on the premise of individualised multidimensional assessment for distinct traits that can be targeted by specific interventions. The potential utility of this approach has been described in airway diseases, but has not been adequately considered in ILD. Given the similar disease heterogeneity and complexity between ILD and airway diseases, we explore the concept and potential application of the treatable traits approach in ILD. A framework of aetiological, pulmonary, extrapulmonary and behavioural and lifestyle treatable traits relevant to clinical care and outcomes for patients with ILD is proposed. We further describe key research directions to evaluate the application of the treatable traits approach towards advancing patient care and health outcomes in ILD.

Challenges in the diagnosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: the importance of a multidisciplinary approach

INTRODUCTION

The diagnosis of Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) requires the careful exclusion of secondary causes of interstitial lung disease (ILD), and the collaboration among different specialists is considered paramount to establish a diagnosis with high diagnostic confidence. The multidisciplinary discussion (MDD) has assumed an increasing importance over the years in the different phases of the IPF diagnostic work-up.

AREAS COVERED

The role of MDD in the diagnosis and management of IPF will be described. Practical insights will be provided into how and when to perform MDD based on the available scientific evidence. Current limitations and future perspectives will be discussed.

EXPERT OPINION

In the absence of high diagnostic confidence, agreement between different specialists during MDD is recognized as a surrogate indicator of diagnostic accuracy. Often, despite a lengthy evaluation, the diagnosis remains unclassifiable in a significant percentage of patients. MDD therefore appears to be pivotal in attaining an accurate diagnosis of ILDs. The discussion among different specialists can also include other specialists, such as rheumatologists and thoracic surgeons, in addition to the core group of pulmonologists, radiologists, and pathologists. Such discussions can allow greater diagnostic accuracy and have important effects on management, pharmacologic therapies, and prognosis.

Progressive pulmonary fibrosis: an expert group consensus statement

This expert group consensus statement emphasises the need for standardising the definition of progressive fibrosing interstitial lung diseases (F-ILDs), with an accurate initial diagnosis being of paramount importance in ensuring appropriate initial management. Equally, case-by-case decisions on monitoring and management are essential, given the varying presentations of F-ILDs and the varying rates of progression. The value of diagnostic tests in risk stratification at presentation and, separately, the importance of a logical monitoring strategy, tailored to manage the risk of progression, are also stressed. The term "progressive pulmonary fibrosis" (PPF) exactly describes the entity that clinicians often face in practice. The importance of using antifibrotic therapy early in PPF (once initial management has failed to prevent progression) is increasingly supported by evidence. Artificial intelligence software for high-resolution computed tomography analysis, although an exciting tool for the future, awaits validation. Guidance is provided on pulmonary rehabilitation, oxygen and the use of non-invasive ventilation focused specifically on the needs of ILD patients with progressive disease. PPF should be differentiated from acute deterioration due to drug-induced lung toxicity or other forms of acute exacerbations. Referral criteria for a lung transplant are discussed and applied to patient needs in severe diseases where transplantation is not realistic, either due to access limitations or transplantation contraindications. In conclusion, expert group consensus guidance is provided on the diagnosis, treatment and monitoring of F-ILDs with specific focus on the recognition of PPF and the management of pulmonary fibrosis progressing despite initial management.

Novel diagnostic techniques in interstitial lung disease

Research into novel diagnostic techniques and targeted therapeutics in interstitial lung disease (ILD) is moving the field toward increased precision and improved patient outcomes. An array of molecular techniques, machine learning approaches and other innovative methods including electronic nose technology and endobronchial optical coherence tomography are promising tools with potential to increase diagnostic accuracy. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the current evidence regarding evolving diagnostic methods in ILD and to consider their future role in routine clinical care.

Current best clinical practices for monitoring of interstitial lung disease

INTRODUCTION

Interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) are a heterogeneous group of inflammatory and/or fibrotic conditions with variable outcome and often a dismal prognosis. Since many ILDs are progressive in nature, monitoring of signs and symptoms of progression is essential to inform treatment decisions and patient counseling. Monitoring of ILDs is a multimodality process and includes all aspects of the disease, e.g. measurement of pulmonary function and exercise capacity, symptom registration and quality of life (QoL), imaging, comorbidities and/or involvement of other organs to assess disease activity, symptom burden, treatment effects, adverse events, the need for supportive and palliative care, and lung transplantation.

AREAS COVERED

For this narrative review, we searched the PUBMED database to identify articles relevant for monitoring ILDs, including pulmonary function tests, exercise capacity, imaging, telemedicine, symptoms, and QoL.

EXPERT OPINION

Due to the high heterogeneity of the ILDs and their disease course, an individualized multimodality approach must be applied. Future strategies include use of telemedicine for home monitoring of lung function and symptoms, use of artificial intelligence to support automatized guidance of patients, computerized evaluation of ILD changes on imaging, and new imaging tools with less radiation dosage.

Diagnosing interstitial lung disease by multidisciplinary discussion: A review

The multidisciplinary meeting (MDM) has been endorsed in current international consensus guidelines as the gold standard method for diagnosis of interstitial lung disease (ILD). In the absence of an accurate and reliable diagnostic test, the agreement between multidisciplinary meetings has been used as a surrogate marker for diagnostic accuracy. Although the ILD MDM has been shown to improve inter-clinician agreement on ILD diagnosis, result in a change in diagnosis in a significant proportion of patients and reduce unclassifiable diagnoses, the ideal form for an ILD MDM remains unclear, with constitution and processes of ILD MDMs varying greatly around the world. It is likely that this variation of practice contributes to the lack of agreement seen between MDMs, as well as suboptimal diagnostic accuracy. A recent Delphi study has confirmed the essential components required for the operation of an ILD MDM. The ILD MDM is a changing entity, as it incorporates new diagnostic tests and genetic markers, while also adapting in its form in response to the obstacles of the COVID-19 pandemic. The aim of this review was to evaluate the current evidence regarding ILD MDM and their role in the diagnosis of ILD, the practice of ILD MDM around the world, approaches to ILD MDM standardization and future directions to improve diagnostic accuracy in ILD.

Management of fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Recent guidelines have updated the classification of hypersensitivity pneumonitis, stratifying by the presence or absence of fibrosis as either fibrotic or nonfibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis. Fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis represents up to 10% of interstitial lung disease in large cohort studies, and is occasionally even more common in some regions; however, there are many unknown aspects to the diagnosis and management. The goal of this review article is to summarize the management of fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis.

RECENT FINDINGS

Historically, the only treatment options for patients with hypersensitivity pneumonitis were antigen avoidance and corticosteroids, although other immunosuppressive therapies are increasingly endorsed by experts in the field. There is accumulating evidence that antifibrotic medications can be useful as a second-line therapy in some patients with fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis who have progression despite immunosuppression. There remains no direct comparison of immunosuppressive vs. antifibrotic medication for the management of fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis, but some clinical, radiological and pathological features may suggest greater likelihood of benefit from one option or the other.

SUMMARY

We anticipate that future treatment of fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis will consider a variety of patient features to suggest the most prominent underlying biology that will then be used to guide initial pharmacotherapy; however, additional data are still needed.

Exploring the Value of Features of Lung Texture in Distinguishing Between Usual and Nonspecific Interstitial Pneumonia

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

This article aims to explore the potential use of lung texture assessed in CT images in distinguishing between the usual interstitial pneumonia and the nonspecific interstitial pneumonia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 96 cases of interstitial pneumonia was performed. Among these cases, there were 40 cases of usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) and 56 cases of the nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP) . All of the patients underwent computed tomography (CT) scans. A lung intelligence kit (LK) was utilized to perform lung segmentation and texture feature extraction. The significant variables were determined by variance analysis, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and multivariate logistic regression. Finally, a multivariate logistic regression model was established to distinguish between the two types of interstitial pneumonia. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, area under the curve (AUC) values, sensitivity, and specificity were used to evaluate the performance of the established model.

RESULTS

A total of 100 texture features were extracted from the whole lung that was segmented by LK, and 8 features remained after feature reduction. The AUC, sensitivity, and specificity of the multivariate logistic regression model in the training group and the test group were 0.952 and 0.838, 0.821 and 0.667, and 0.949 and 0.824, respectively.

CONCLUSION

It is possible to distinguish between UIP and NSIP using lung texture features obtained from CT images.

Clinical relevance of rheumatoid factor and anti-citrullinated peptides in fibrotic interstitial lung disease

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a frequent cause of interstitial lung disease (ILD); however, the impact of rheumatoid factor and anti-citrullinated peptide antibody seropositivity in ILD without connective tissue disease (CTD) is unclear. We examined the association of seropositivity with ILD progression, mortality and response to immunosuppression in non-CTD ILD.

METHODS

A total of 1570 non-CTD patients (with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, hypersensitivity pneumonitis, interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features or unclassifiable ILD) and 181 RA-ILD patients were included from a prospective registry. Longitudinal forced vital capacity (FVC), transplant-free survival and incidence of progressive fibrosing-ILD (PF-ILD) were compared between seronegative non-CTD ILD (reference group), seropositive non-CTD ILD and RA-ILD using linear mixed-effect and Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for age, sex, smoking pack-years and baseline FVC. Interaction between seropositivity and immunosuppression on FVC decline was assessed in patients with ≥6 months of follow-up before and after the treatment.

RESULTS

Two hundred and seventeen (13.8%) patients with seropositive non-CTD ILD had similar rates of FVC decline and transplant-free survival compared to seronegative non-CTD ILD, but more frequently met the criteria for PF-ILD (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.35, p = 0.004). RA-ILD had slower FVC decline (p = 0.03), less PF-ILD (HR = 0.75, p = 0.03) and lower likelihood of lung transplant or death (HR = 0.66, p = 0.01) compared to seronegative non-CTD ILD. No interaction was found between seropositivity and treatment on FVC decline in non-CTD ILD.

CONCLUSION

Seropositivity in non-CTD ILD was not associated with improved outcomes or treatment response, highlighting the importance of other disease features in determining prognosis and predicting response to immunosuppression.