Development and validation of a radiological diagnosis model for hypersensitivity pneumonitis

Advanced Imaging and Occupational History in the Diagnosis of Bird Fancier's Lung: A Case Report

Bird fancier's lung (BFL) is a subtype of hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP), an immune-mediated interstitial lung disease (ILD) resulting from the repeated inhalation of avian proteins found in bird droppings, feathers, and serum. Diagnosing BFL is challenging due to nonspecific symptoms that overlap with other ILDs like idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and sarcoidosis. This complexity is heightened during pandemics such as coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), where respiratory symptoms may be misattributed to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, leading to diagnostic anchoring and delays in appropriate management. High-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) is pivotal in detecting subtle pulmonary changes, characteristic of HP, surpassing standard chest radiographs. We present the case of a 43-year-old male pigeon keeper with an eight-week history of progressive dyspnea on exertion and intermittent chest pain. Despite unremarkable chest X-rays, HRCT revealed bilateral diffuse centrilobular nodules, patchy ground-glass opacities, and a mosaic attenuation pattern without fibrosis, consistent with acute HP. A thorough occupational history uncovered significant avian antigen exposure, and a family history suggested genetic susceptibility. The patient was diagnosed with BFL and treated with a tapering regimen of oral corticosteroids, starting at 40 mg/day. He was advised to cease pigeon keeping and avoid future avian exposure. Significant symptomatic improvement occurred within three months. Follow-up imaging over one year confirmed stable lung parenchyma with no disease progression or recurrence. This case underscores the importance of incorporating detailed occupational histories and utilizing advanced imaging modalities like HRCT when standard imaging is inconclusive. Early identification and intervention are crucial to prevent progression to chronic HP and irreversible fibrosis. Management should focus on reducing inflammation with corticosteroids and implementing strict environmental controls to prevent re-exposure. Long-term follow-up is essential to monitor for recurrence and maintain remission. Clinicians should remain vigilant for alternative diagnoses during pandemics to avoid diagnostic anchoring. This case contributes to the evidence supporting HRCT's critical role in early HP detection and emphasizes heightened clinical awareness of occupational lung diseases. A multidisciplinary approach involving pulmonologists, radiologists, and occupational medicine specialists is key to optimizing outcomes in HP and other ILDs.

Hypersensitivity pneumonitis radiologic features in interstitial lung diseases

BACKGROUND

The radiologic criteria of hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP) guidelines focus on four HP compatible features (HPCF) in high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT): ground glass opacities, mosaic attenuation, air-trapping, and centrilobular nodules. However, evidence to support these criteria are limited.

METHODS

Consecutive interstitial lung disease (ILD) patients who underwent HRCT between 2016 and 2021 in three medical centers were included. We assessed the prevalence of HPCF in each ILD and their association with HP diagnosis. We evaluated the impact of HPCF amount for HP diagnosis and the performance of the radiologic criteria by the ATS/JRS/ALAT and CHEST HP guidelines.

RESULTS

436 patients with ILD were included (mean age 66, 48 % females), of them, 56 (13 %) with HP. All four HPCF were more prevalent in HP than in non-HP ILD (p < 0.001 for all). In multivariate analysis, air-trapping was the strongest independent predictor (AOR 4.1, 95 % CI 2-8.4, p < 0.001). Centrilobular nodules were present almost exclusively in HP and smoking-related ILD. The amount of HPCF in HRCT had an excellent predictive ability for HP diagnosis (receiver operating characteristic AUC 0.85, 95 % CI 0.80-0.90). The radiologic criteria of both guidelines had high specificity for "typical HP" and high sensitivity for "compatible with HP", although with low positive predictive values. Our findings remained robust even when including only patients that had a diagnostic biopsy.

CONCLUSION

The presence and amount of HPCF in HRCT predicted HP diagnosis in real-life settings. While current HP radiologic criteria demonstrated good diagnostic performance, our findings highlight areas for future improvement.

[Diagnosis and Treatment of Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis - S2k Guideline of the German Respiratory Society and the German Society for Allergology and Clinical Immunology]

Hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP) is an immune-mediated interstitial lung disease (ILD) in sensitized individuals caused by a large variety of inhaled antigens. The clinical form of acute HP is often misdiagnosed, while the chronic form, especially the chronic fibrotic HP, is difficult to differentiate from other fibrotic ILDs. The present guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of HP replaces the former German recommendations for the diagnosis of HP from 2007 and is amended explicitly by the issue of the chronic fibrotic form, as well as by treatment recommendations for the first time. The evidence was discussed by a multidisciplinary committee of experts. Then, recommendations were formulated for twelve questions on important issues of diagnosis and treatment strategies. Recently published national and international guidelines for ILDs and HP were considered. Detailed background information on HP is useful for a deeper insight into HP and the handling of the guideline.

Factors associated with interstitial lung disease and the progressive fibrosing phenotype in rheumatoid arthritis-related interstitial lung disease

Background

The risk factors for interstitial lung disease (ILD) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are inconsistent among previous studies. Furthermore, the factors associated with the emergence of the recently defined progressive fibrosing (PF) phenotype are unknown. Herein, we analyze the risk factors for ILD in RA. We also analyze the factors associated with a PF phenotype.

Methods

We collected the clinical and laboratory details of subjects with RA with (cases) or without (controls) ILD. Scoring of high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) features of ILD was performed. We identified the subgroup that developed the PF phenotype during follow-up. We analyzed the factors associated with ILD using logistic regression (primary objective). We also compared the characteristics of ILD subjects with or without the PF phenotype (secondary objective).

Results

We included 60 subjects (30 cases, 30 controls). Subjects with ILD had higher age, lower body mass index, longer duration of RA, and poorer lung function than the controls. Age (p = 0.007) and the duration of RA (p = 0.049) were the only significant predictors of ILD on univariate and multivariate analysis, respectively. Six (20%) subjects with RA-ILD developed a PF phenotype. These subjects were older, had greater frequency of honeycombing, and higher HRCT scores for honeycombing and aggregate fibrosis than those without the PF phenotype. Among subjects with honeycombing, 41.7% developed the PF phenotype.

Conclusions

RA-ILD was associated with the duration of RA and age. Subjects with the PF phenotype were older and had higher honeycombing and fibrosis scores on HRCT chest.

Validation of a computed tomography diagnostic model for differentiating fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis from idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

BACKGROUND

The diagnosis of fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis (fHP) from other interstitial lung diseases, particularly idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), is often difficult. This study aimed to examine computed tomography (CT) findings that were useful for differentiating between fHP and IPF and to develop and validate a radiological diagnostic model.

METHODS

In this study, 246 patients (fHP, n = 104; IPF, n = 142) from two institutions were included and randomly divided into the test (n = 164) and validation (n = 82) groups (at a 2:1 ratio). Three radiologists evaluated CT findings, such as pulmonary fibrosis, small airway disease, and predominant distribution, and compared them between fHP and IPF using binomial logistic regression and multivariate analysis. A prognostic model was developed from the test group and validated with the validation group.

RESULTS

Ground-glass opacity (GGO) with traction bronchiectasis (TB), honeycombing, hypoattenuation area, three-density pattern, diffuse craniocaudal distribution, peribronchovascular opacities in the upper lung, and random distribution were more common in fHP than in IPF. In multivariate analysis, GGO with TB, peribronchovascular opacities in the upper lung, and random distribution were significant features. The area under the curve of the fHP diagnostic model with the three aforementioned CT features was 0.733 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.655-0.811, p < 0.001) in the test group and 0.630 (95% CI, 0.504-0.755, p < 0.047) in the validation group.

CONCLUSION

GGO with TB, peribronchovascular opacities in the upper lung, and random distribution were important CT features for differentiating fHP from IPF.

Pictorial Review of Fibrotic Interstitial Lung Disease on High-Resolution CT Scan and Updated Classification

TOPIC IMPORTANCE

Given the recently expanded approval of antifibrotics for various fibrotic interstitial lung diseases (ILDs), early and correct recognition of these diseases is imperative for physicians. Because high-resolution chest CT scan forms the backbone of diagnosis for ILD, this review will discuss evidence-based imaging findings of key fibrotic ILDs and an approach for differentiating these diseases.

REVIEW FINDINGS

(1) Imaging findings of nonspecific interstitial pneumonia may evolve over time and become indistinguishable from usual interstitial pneumonia. Therefore, if remote imaging can be reviewed, this would increase the likelihood of an accurate imaging diagnosis, particularly if findings appear to represent a usual interstitial pneumonia pattern on the recent examination. (2) Given the difficulty and lack of objectivity in classifying patients with hypersensitivity pneumonitis into acute, subacute, and chronic categories and that prognosis depends primarily on presence or absence of fibrosis, the new set of guidelines released in 2020 categorizes patients with hypersensitivity pneumonitis as either nonfibrotic (purely inflammatory) or fibrotic (either purely fibrotic or mixed fibrotic/inflammatory) based on imaging and/or histologic findings, and the prior temporal terms are no longer used. (3) Interstitial lung abnormalities are incidental CT scan findings that may suggest early ILD in patients without clinical suspicion for ILD. Patients with high-risk features should undergo clinical evaluation for ILD and be actively monitored for disease progression.

SUMMARY

Fibrotic ILD on high-resolution chest CT scan is a complex topic, but with use of an evidence-based analysis and algorithm as provided in this article, the probability of a correct imaging diagnosis increases.

Hypersensitivity pneumonitis: application of a new diagnostic algorithm to a time series of the disease

BACKGROUND

The diagnostic criteria for Hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP) have changed over time. Our aim is to apply a recent diagnostic algorithm to a historical series of patients diagnosed with HP to assess its distribution according to current diagnostic criteria and the diagnostic confidence achieved.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Application to each patient the algorithm criteria. The diagnosis was HP (≥90%), provisional high (70-89%) or low confidence (51-69%) or non-HP (unlikely) (≤50%); or HP, provisional or non-HP, if they had lung biopsy.

RESULTS

129 patients [mean age 64 ± 12 years; 79 (61.2%) women] were included of which 16 (12.4%) were diagnosed on the basis of high clinical suspicion. After applying the algorithm, 106 patients (82.2%) could be evaluated and 83 (78.3%) had a diagnosis of HP or high confidence. Lung biopsy was able to establish a diagnosis of certainty in another 21 patients and a provisional diagnosis in 9 more [total, 113 (87.6%)]. The 16 patients without strict diagnostic criteria for HP had a low confidence diagnosis. A total of 56 lung biopsies (64.4%) could have been avoided according to the new guidelines.

CONCLUSIONS

The application of this algorithm achieves a high diagnostic yield in HP, significantly reducing the number of lung biopsies required.

Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis: Challenges of a Complex Disease

Hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP) is a complex interstitial lung disease caused by chronic inhalation of a wide variety of antigens in susceptible and sensitized individuals, commonly associated with an occupational exposure. An impressive number of inciting antigens causing hypersensitivity pneumonitis have been found to cover a wide range of occupations. As working practices have changed over time, especially in industrialized countries, new names for occupational HP have emerged. This review emphasizes the main diagnostic issues arising from the high variability of clinical presentation and the broad spectrum of causal antigens. Furthermore, it provides an overview of current methods to unveil possible causes of hypersensitivity pneumonitis, highlights HP's current diagnostic and treatment challenges and the remaining areas of uncertainty, and presents prevention strategies.

Serum Specific Antibodies Do Not Seem to Have an Additional Role in the Diagnosis of Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis

BACKGROUND

We aimed to investigate the contribution of serum IgG testing to the history of exposure in the diagnosis of fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis.

METHODS

A single-center, retrospective, cross-sectional study including 63 patients pathologically diagnosed with fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis in line with the guidelines of the American Thoracic Society. Descriptive statistics were presented and Kappa statistic was performed to evaluate the compatibility between panel and the history of exposure.

RESULTS

The median age was 63 (22-81) years and 34 (54%) were male. Forty-six patients (73%) had a positive history of exposure. Thirty-nine patients (61.9%) had a positive HP/Avian panel. The most common exposure agent was mold (34.9%), followed by parakeet (31.7%). The antibody detected the most was penicillium chrysogenum lgG (36.5%), followed by aspergillus fumigatus (31.8%). There was no compatibility between HP/Avian panel and history of exposure (kappa coefficient= 0.18, p= 0.14). When the exposure was only assessed based on the history, 4 (6.35%) patients were diagnosed as fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis with low confidence, 6 (9.52%) with moderate confidence, 11 (17.46%) with high confidence and 42 (66.67%) with definite confidence; whereas 4 (6.35%) patients were diagnosed as fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis with low confidence, 6 (9.52%) with moderate confidence, 9 (14.29%) patients with high confidence and 44 (69.84%) patients with definite confidence if exposure was evaluated with history and/or panel.

CONCLUSIONS

Serum specific precipitating antibody panel does not seem to provide additional value to the history of exposure in the diagnosis of fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis.

The Association between Exposures and Disease Characteristics in Familial Pulmonary Fibrosis

Rationale: Heterogeneous characteristics are observed in familial pulmonary fibrosis (FPF), suggesting that nongenetic factors contribute to disease manifestations. Objectives: To determine the relationship between environmental exposures and disease characteristics of FPF, including the morphological characteristics on chest computed tomography (CT) scan, and timing of FPF symptom onset, lung transplantation, or death. Methods: Subjects with FPF with an exposure questionnaire and chest CT were selected from a prospective cohort at Vanderbilt. Disease characteristics were defined by lung parenchymal findings on chest CT associated with fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis (fHP) or usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) and by time from birth to symptom onset or a composite of lung transplantation or death. After assessing the potential for confounding by sex or smoking, adjusted logistic or Cox proportional hazards regression models identified exposures associated with fHP or UIP CT findings. Findings were validated in a cohort of patients with sporadic pulmonary fibrosis enrolled in the LTRC (Lung Tissue Research Consortium) study. Results: Among 159 subjects with FPF, 98 (61.6%) were males and 96 (60.4%) were ever-smokers. Males were less likely to have CT features of fHP, including mosaic attenuation (FPF: adjusted [for sex and smoking] odds ratio [aOR], 0.27; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.09-0.76; P = 0.01; LTRC: aOR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.21-0.61; P = 0.0002). Organic exposures, however, were not consistently associated with fHP features in either cohort. Smoking was a risk factor for honeycombing in both cohorts (FPF: aOR, 2.19; 95% CI, 1.12-4.28; P = 0.02; LTRC: aOR, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.22-2.33; P = 0.002). Rock dust exposure may also be associated with honeycombing, although the association was not statistically-significant when accounting for sex and smoking (FPF: aOR, 2.27; 95% CI, 0.997-5.15; P = 0.051; LTRC: aOR, 1.51; 95% CI, 0.97-2.33; P = 0.07). In the FPF cohort, ever-smokers experienced a shorter transplant-free survival (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.07-2.52; P = 0.02), whereas sex was not associated with differential survival (male adjusted hazard ratio, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.50-1.14; P = 0.18). Conclusions: In FPF, smoking contributes to shortened transplant-free survival and development of honeycombing, a finding that is also likely applicable to sporadic pulmonary fibrosis. Females are more likely to manifest CT features of fHP (mosaic attenuation), a finding that was incompletely explained by sex differences in exposures. These findings may have implications for pulmonary fibrosis classification and management.

High-Resolution Computed Tomography of Fibrotic Interstitial Lung Disease

While radiography is the first-line imaging technique for evaluation of pulmonary disease, high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) provides detailed assessment of the lung parenchyma and interstitium, allowing normal anatomy to be differentiated from superimposed abnormal findings. The fibrotic interstitial lung diseases have HRCT features that include reticulation, traction bronchiectasis and bronchiolectasis, honeycombing, architectural distortion, and volume loss. The characterization and distribution of these features result in distinctive CT patterns. The CT pattern and its progression over time can be combined with clinical, serologic, and pathologic data during multidisciplinary discussion to establish a clinical diagnosis. Serial examinations identify progression, treatment response, complications, and can assist in determining prognosis. This article will describe the technique used to perform HRCT, the normal and abnormal appearance of the lung on HRCT, and the CT patterns identified in common fibrotic lung diseases.

The Challenging Diagnosis of Interstitial Lung Disease in Children-One Case Report and Literature Review

Childhood interstitial lung disease (chILD) includes a heterogeneous spectrum of rare respiratory disorders in children associated with substantial morbi-mortality. Interstitial tissue, and other pulmonary structures, epithelium, blood vessels, or pleura are involved, resulting in a restrictive lung disfunction. Respiratory symptoms set in progressively and are often subtle, making thorough clinical history and physical examination fundamental. The etiology often is obscure. The clinical presentation mimics pneumonia or asthma, leading to a diagnostic delay. Challenging diagnosis may require genetic tests, bronchoalveolar lavage, or lung biopsy. Alongside general supportive therapeutic measures, anti-inflammatory, immunosuppressive or antifibrotic agents may be used, based on data derived from adult studies. However, if accurate diagnosis and treatment are delayed, irreversible chronic respiratory failure may ensue, impacting prognosis. The most frequent chILD is hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP), although it is rare in children. HP is associated with exposure to an environmental antigen, resulting in inflammation of the airways. Detailed antigen exposure history and identification of the inciting trigger are the cornerstones of diagnostic. This article provides the current state of chILD, revealing specific features of HP, based on a clinical case report of a patient admitted in our clinic, requiring extensive investigations for diagnosis, with a favorable long-term outcome.

High-resolution computed tomography in the diagnosis of fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis: A review

Aim. Assess the detection of rare computed tomographic features and their combination to detect cases of fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP). A retrospective analysis of data from high-resolution computed tomography of the lungs was performed in 52 patients with fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis (fHP), in whom the clinical diagnosis was confirmed by morphological examination of lung biopsy. The analysis of the identified changes was carried out by qualitative and quantitative methods. The study included signs common to non-fibrotic and fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis of HP, including ground glass symptom, mosaic density, centrilobular lesions, and emphysema. Separately, features related to pulmonary fibrosis in fHP, such as reticular changes, traction bronchiectasis, and honeycombing, were analyzed. In addition, the distribution parameters of these signs were determined separately in the cranio-caudal direction and in the axial plane. To search for combinations of tomographic features that are significant in the diagnosis, a correlation analysis of the identified changes was carried out. Materials and methods. The revealed CT-signs of fHP in most cases correspond to the clinical recommendations for the diagnosis of HP. However, in fHP, signs were found with a high frequency that did not correspond to the typical picture of HP, in particular, the "ground glass" symptom. On the contrary, a relatively low percentage of occurrence was observed in relation to centrilobular lesions and "mosaic density", which were also an important part of the typical HP pattern. Emphysema, which is not included in any of the HP patterns, was noted with a relatively high frequency, and in some cases was combined with the "honeycomb lung" symptom. The greatest strength of the correlation was found in such combinations of signs as "frosted glass" + reticular changes; "frosted glass" + "mosaic density"; reticular changes + "mosaic density"; emphysema + centrilobular foci, as well as reticular changes + bronchiectasis. These combinations occurred with a relatively high frequency among the examined patients. Results. Most of the identified changes correspond to current recommendations for the diagnosis of HP. A weak correlation between the signs does not allow us to identify combinations of signs with sufficient reliability that can help in the early diagnosis of HP.

Mosaic attenuation in non-fibrotic areas as a predictor of non-usual interstitial pneumonia pathologic diagnosis

The new radiological diagnostic criteria for diagnosing idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) seek to optimize the indications for surgical lung biopsy (SLB). We applied the new criteria to a retrospective series of patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) who underwent SLB in order to analyse the correlation between the radiological findings suggestive of another diagnosis (especially mosaic attenuation and its location with respect to fibrotic areas) and the usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) pathologic diagnosis. Two thoracic radiologists reviewed the HRCT images of 83 patients with ILD and SLB, describing the radiological findings and patterns based on the new criteria. The association of each radiological finding with radiological patterns and histology was analysed. Mosaic attenuation is highly prevalent in both the UIP and non-UIP pathologic diagnosis and with similar frequency (80.0% vs. 78.6%). However, the presence of significant mosaic attenuation (≥ 3 lobes) only in non-fibrotic areas was observed in 60.7% of non-UIP pathologic diagnosis compared to 20.0% in UIP. This finding was associated with other diagnoses different from IPF, mostly connective tissue disease-associated interstitial lung disease (CTD-ILD) and hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP). In our series of pathologically confirmed ILD, mosaic attenuation in non-fibrotic areas was a predictor of non-UIP pathologic diagnosis, and was associated with other diagnoses different from UIP, mostly CTD-ILD and HP. If confirmed in larger series, this finding could constitute a valuable tool for improving the interpretation of radiological patterns.

Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (an Update) and Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis in Adults: An Official ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT Clinical Practice Guideline

Background: This American Thoracic Society, European Respiratory Society, Japanese Respiratory Society, and Asociación Latinoamericana de Tórax guideline updates prior idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) guidelines and addresses the progression of pulmonary fibrosis in patients with interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) other than IPF. Methods: A committee was composed of multidisciplinary experts in ILD, methodologists, and patient representatives. 1) Update of IPF: Radiological and histopathological criteria for IPF were updated by consensus. Questions about transbronchial lung cryobiopsy, genomic classifier testing, antacid medication, and antireflux surgery were informed by systematic reviews and answered with evidence-based recommendations using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. 2) Progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PPF): PPF was defined, and then radiological and physiological criteria for PPF were determined by consensus. Questions about pirfenidone and nintedanib were informed by systematic reviews and answered with evidence-based recommendations using the GRADE approach. Results:1) Update of IPF: A conditional recommendation was made to regard transbronchial lung cryobiopsy as an acceptable alternative to surgical lung biopsy in centers with appropriate expertise. No recommendation was made for or against genomic classifier testing. Conditional recommendations were made against antacid medication and antireflux surgery for the treatment of IPF. 2) PPF: PPF was defined as at least two of three criteria (worsening symptoms, radiological progression, and physiological progression) occurring within the past year with no alternative explanation in a patient with an ILD other than IPF. A conditional recommendation was made for nintedanib, and additional research into pirfenidone was recommended. Conclusions: The conditional recommendations in this guideline are intended to provide the basis for rational, informed decisions by clinicians.

Diagnosis of Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis: Review and Summary of American College of Chest Physicians Statement

Assessment of lung biopsies for the diagnosis of hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP) is one of the most difficult diagnostic problems for surgical pathologists. It is a form of interstitial lung disease resulting from an immune reaction provoked by an inhaled antigen in susceptible individuals. Although this definition sounds simple, in practice, the diagnosis of HP can be challenging. To address these issues, the American College of Chest Physicians (CHEST) has recently published a guideline for the diagnosis of HP. In this review, we will explore the multidisciplinary diagnostic evaluation of HP with a focus on the pathologic features as outlined in the CHEST guidelines. The histologic criteria are divided into 4 diagnostic categories: (1) Typical nonfibrotic HP or fibrotic HP; (2) Compatible with nonfibrotic HP or fibrotic HP; (3) Indeterminate for nonfibrotic or fibrotic HP; and (4) Alternative Diagnosis. It is important to emphasize that patterns 1 to 3 do not represent discrete histologic entities or pathologic diagnoses. Rather, these categories are meant to serve as a practical guide for organizing a complex set of overlapping histologic patterns into an integrated diagnostic framework for facilitating multidisciplinary discussion. High-resolution computed tomography features are also summarized, emphasizing how the correlation of lung biopsies with computed tomography findings can help to favor the diagnosis, particularly in cases where biopsies are not typical for HP. This review highlights details of the histologic spectrum of HP as well as the utility of different types of biopsies and bronchoalveolar lavage. We also emphasize the importance of multidisciplinary discussion and the complex differential diagnosis.

The new useful high-resolution computed tomography finding for diagnosing fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis: "hexagonal pattern": a single-center retrospective study

Background

Centrilobular nodules, ground-glass opacity (GGO), mosaic attenuation, air trapping, and three-density pattern were reported as high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) findings characteristic of fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP). However, it is often difficult to differentiate fibrotic HP from idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). In fibrotic HP, the HRCT sometimes shows tortoiseshell-like interlobular septal thickening that extends from the subpleural lesion to the inner layers. This finding is called “hexagonal pattern,” and this study is focused on the possibility that such finding is useful for differentiating fibrotic HP from IPF.

Methods

This study included patients with multidisciplinary discussion (MDD) diagnosis of fibrotic HP or IPF undergoing surgical lung biopsy between January 2015 and December 2017 in Kanagawa Cardiovascular and Respiratory Center. Two radiologists have evaluated the HRCT findings without clinical and pathological information.

Results

A total of 23 patients were diagnosed with fibrotic HP by MDD and 48 with IPF. Extensive GGO, centrilobular nodules, and hexagonal pattern were more frequent findings in fibrotic HP than in IPF. No significant difference was observed between the two groups in the presence or absence of mosaic attenuation, air trapping, or three-density pattern. In the multivariate logistic regression, the presence of extensive GGO and hexagonal pattern was associated with increased odds ratio of fibrotic HP. The sensitivity and specificity of the diagnosis of fibrotic HP in the presence of the hexagonal pattern were 69.6% and 87.5%, respectively.

Conclusion

Hexagonal pattern is a useful finding for differentiating fibrotic HP from IPF.

Development and evaluation of a computer-based decision support system for diffuse lung diseases at high-resolution computed tomography

BACKGROUND

High-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) is essential in narrowing the possible differential diagnoses of diffuse and interstitial lung diseases.

PURPOSE

To investigate the value of a novel computer-based decision support system (CDSS) for facilitating diagnosis of diffuse lung diseases at HRCT.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A CDSS was developed that includes about 100 different illustrations of the most common HRCT signs and patterns and describes the corresponding pathologies in detail. The logical set-up of the software facilitates a structured evaluation. By selecting one or more CT patterns, the program generates a ranked list of the most likely differential diagnoses. Three independent and blinded radiology residents initially evaluated 40 cases with different lung diseases alone; after at least 12 weeks, observers re-evaluated all cases using the CDSS.

RESULTS

In 40 patients, a total of 113 HRCT patterns were evaluated. The percentage of correctly classified patterns was higher with CDSS (96.8%) compared to assessment without CDSS (90.3%; P < 0.01). Moreover, the percentage of correct diagnosis (81.7% vs. 64.2%) and differential diagnoses (89.2% vs. 38.3%) were superior with CDSS compared to evaluation without CDSS (both P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Addition of a CDSS using a structured approach providing explanations of typical HRCT patterns and graphical illustrations significantly improved the performance of trainees in characterizing and correctly identifying diffuse lung diseases.

A CT Algorithm Can Elevate the Differential Diagnosis of Interstitial Lung Disease by Non-specialists to Equal That of Specialist Thoracic Radiologists

BACKGROUND

Diagnosis of diffuse parenchymal lung diseases (DPLD) on high resolution CT (HRCT) is difficult for non-expert radiologists due to varied presentation for any single disease and overlap in presentation between diseases.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

To evaluate whether a pattern-based training algorithm can improve the ability of non-experts to diagnosis of DPLD.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Five experts (cardiothoracic-trained radiologists), and 25 non-experts (non-cardiothoracic-trained radiologists, radiology residents, and pulmonologists) were each assigned a semi-random subset of cases from a compiled database of DPLD HRCTs. Each reader was asked to create a top three differential for each case. The non-experts were then given a pattern-based training algorithm for identifying DPLDs. Following training, the non-experts were again asked to create a top three differential for each case that they had previously evaluated. Accuracy between groups was compared using Chi-Square analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 400 and 1450 studies were read by experts and non-experts, respectively. Experts correctly placed the diagnosis as the first item on the differential versus having the correct diagnosis as one of their top three diagnoses at an overall rate of 48 and 64.3%, respectively. Pre-training, non-experts achieved a correct diagnosis/top three of 32.5 and 49.7%, respectively. Post-training, non-experts demonstrated a correct diagnosis/top three of 41.2 and 65%, a statistically significant increase (p < 0.0001). In addition, post training, there was no difference between non-experts and experts in placing the correct diagnosis within their top three differential.

CONCLUSION

The diagnosis of DPLDs by HRCT imaging alone is relatively poor. However, use of a pattern-based teaching algorithm can improve non-expert interpretation and enable non-experts to include the correct diagnosis within their differential diagnoses at a rate comparable to expert cardiothoracic trained radiologists.

Use of peripheral neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio and peripheral monocyte levels to predict survival in fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis (fHP): a multicentre retrospective cohort study

The factors determining disease course and survival in fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis (fHP) have not been fully elucidated.The aim of this study was to describe the characteristics of patients with fHP in a real-world cohort and investigate factors associated with worse outcomes. We aimed to explore the use of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and peripheral blood monocyte levels in predicting mortality.

METHODS

A retrospective, multicentre, observational UK cohort study.

RESULTS

Patients with fHP were significantly younger than those with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) (median age fHP 73 vs IPF 75 years) and were much more likely to be woman (fHP 61% vs IPF 26%). In almost half of all fHP cases (49%, n=104/211), no causative antigen was identified from either the history or specific antigen testing. Overall, fHP was associated with a better survival than IPF, although median survival of both groups was poor (fHP 62 months vs IPF 52 months).IPF survival in patients with a high NLR was significantly lower than those with a low NLR (44 vs 83 months). A monocyte count ≥0.95 K/uL also predicted significantly poorer outcomes for patients with IPF compared with <0.95 K/uL (33 vs 57 months). In contrast, NLR and monocyte count did not predict survival in the fHP cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

Although fHP has a statistically lower mortality than IPF, absolute survival time of both conditions is poor. High baseline NLR and absolute monocyte counts predict worse survival in IPF but not in fHP, highlighting the potential for divergence in their pathogenic mechanisms.

Derivation and validation of a prediction model for histopathologic fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis

BACKGROUND

Clinical differentiation of fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis (f-HP) remains challenging given variable and overlapping presentations with other fibrotic interstitial lung disease (f-ILD).

OBJECTIVE

We derived a multivariable model for predicting histopathologic f-HP to better inform multidisciplinary team discussion (MDD) diagnosis, particularly when biopsy may be unsafe or cannot be achieved.

METHODS

Patients with histopathologically-defined f-HP and other overlapping f-ILD were reviewed for distinguishing clinical and radiological variables. Using elastic net logistic regression, a penalized regression approach to minimize overfitting, a clinical model built on non-invasive assessments was derived for the prediction of histopathologic f-HP. This model was then validated in an independently derived external cohort from three sites.

RESULTS

The derivation and validation cohorts consisted of 248 (84 cHP and 164 other f-ILD) and 157 (82 f-HP and 75 other f-ILD) histopathologically-defined patients, respectively (total study N = 405). Variables retained from the elastic net model included age in years (regression coefficient 0.033), male sex (-1.109), positive exposure history (1.318), percent predicted forced vital capacity (-0.021), radiologic peribronchovascular axial ILD distribution (0.199), mid (-0.22) or lower lobe (-0.839) craniocaudal or patchy (0.287) ILD distribution, upper (1.188) or equivalent upper and lower lobe (0.237) traction bronchiectasis, mosaic attenuation (1.164), and centrilobular nodules (2.045). Bias corrected AUC was 0.84 (standard error = 0.02) for the derivation cohort and 0.80 (CI 0.73-0.87) for the validation cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

This multivariable model demonstrated good predictive performance for delineating histopathologically-defined f-HP from other f-ILD as a means of avoiding or justifying biopsy and supporting MDD diagnostic confidence.

Diagnostic Classification of Interstitial Lung Disease in Clinical Practice

Interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) are challenging to diagnose, requiring integration of multiple complex features that are often difficult to interpret. This article reviews a pragmatic approach to ILD diagnosis and classification, focusing on diagnostic tools and strategies that are used to separate different subtypes and identify the most appropriate management. We discuss the evolution of ILD classification and the contemporary approach that integrates routinely used diagnostic tools in a multidisciplinary discussion. We highlight the increasing importance of taking a multipronged approach to ILD classification that reflects the recent emphasis on disease behavior while also considering etiopathogenesis and morphologic features.

Transbronchial biopsy in chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis

Introduction

The diagnosis of chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis (CHP) is based on relevant exposure, tomographic findings and, in some cases, pathological data. The role of bronchoscopy is uncertain, especially in the fibrotic form of CHP.

Aim

To analyze the yield of transbronchial biopsy (TBBx) in patients with CHP according to tomographic findings and to evaluate the importance of bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) in the diagnostic approach.

Methods

This retrospective study analyzed patients with CHP who underwent TBBx in São Paulo, Brazil. The TBBx findings were classified as characteristic (granulomas and/or multinucleated giant cells, associated or not with peribronchiolar infiltration of lymphocytes and plasma cells and bronchiolocentric distribution) and supportive (data indicative of small airway injury: peribronchiolar metaplasia, organizing pneumonia, and intra-alveolar foamy macrophages).

Results

One hundred nine patients were included. The presence of characteristic findings of HP was seen in 16 patients (14.7%), and supportive findings were seen in 32 patients (29.4%), with a total yield of 44%. Pathological characteristic findings were more common in cases without fibrosis on high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) (27.3% vs. 9.2%, p= 0.014), whereas the presence of supportive findings was more common in fibrotic HP (38.1% vs. 9.1%, p= 0.002). Fifty-two patients had differential cytology in BAL fluid. Lymphocytosis (> 20%) was present in 51.9% of the patients. There was no difference in the median lymphocyte count according to nonfibrotic and fibrotic tomographic findings on HRCT.

Conclusion

TBBx and BAL fluid cytology have a role in CHP diagnosis.

The Role of Surgical Lung Biopsy in the Diagnosis of Fibrotic Interstitial Lung Disease: Perspective from the Pulmonary Fibrosis Foundation

Diagnosis of interstitial lung disease (ILD) requires a multidisciplinary diagnosis (MDD) approach that includes clinicians, radiologists, and pathologists. Surgical lung biopsy (SLB) is currently the recommended standard in obtaining pathological specimens for patients with ILD requiring a tissue diagnosis. The increased diagnostic confidence and accuracy provided by microscopic pathology assessment of SLB specimens must be balanced with the associated risks in ILD patients. This document was developed by the Surgical Lung Biopsy Working Group of the Pulmonary Fibrosis Foundation, composed of a multidisciplinary group of ILD physicians including pulmonologists, radiologists, pathologists, and thoracic surgeons. In this document, we present an up-to-date literature review of the indications, contraindications, risks, and alternatives to SLB in the diagnosis of fibrotic ILD, outline an integrated approach to the decision-making around SLB in the diagnosis of fibrotic ILD, and provide practical information to maximize the yield and safety of SLB.

Effect of Oral Methyl Prednisolone on Different Radiological Patterns of Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis

Background

Hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP) is an immune-mediated disorder that causes inflammation of interstitial lung, bronchioles, and alveoli. Although corticosteroids have been used as first line treatment for HP for many years, it does not provide satisfactory results in all patients. The aim of this study is to compare the effect of oral methylprednisolone on different radiological patterns of HP to identify the most adequate candidates for corticosteroids.

Patients and Methods

Fifty-three patients with confirmed diagnosis of HP were divided into two groups according to their radiological patterns based on high resolution computed tomography (HRCT) findings. The first group included 21 patients with fibrotic HP (fHP), the second group included 32 patients without fibrosis; non-fibrotic HP patients (nfHP). The second group is divided into 3 subgroups: mosaic, attenuation, centrilobular nodules and finally, ground-glass opacities. All patients were administered methylprednisolone by dose 0.5mg/kg/day for eight consecutive weeks. HRCT was performed at the beginning of the study. Spirometry, six-minute walk and oximetry were performed periodically to assess the patients' progress.

Results

Upon finalizing the treatment process, a significant improvement was noticed in FEV1 (p < 0.001), FVC (p <0.001), six-minute walk test (p =0.001) and oximetry (p <0.05) in nfHP compared to the fHP patients. However, there was a significant improvement in (p <0.01), FVC (p <0.01), oximetry (p <0.01) and six-minute walk test (p <0.01) in fibrotic patients after receiving the treatment. There was no significant difference in the response of FEV1 (p =0.82), FVC (p =0.15), six-minute walk test (p =0.36) and oximetry (p =0.27) among the subgroups of nfHP patients.

Conclusion

It was accordingly concluded that corticosteroid treatment is more effective in treatment of nfHP than fHP patients but still has effect on fibrotic patients. There is no significant difference in the response to corticosteroids among nfHP patients' subgroups.

[Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis: An update]

Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis (HP) is a common immune-mediated interstitial lung disease (ILD) induced by repeated exposure to environmental antigens in susceptible individuals. The most commonly known forms are bird fancier's disease and farmer's lung. However, the antigens involved are widely diverse. Therefore, the list of causes of HP is frequently expanding. HP seems to be under-diagnosed owing to its highly heterogeneous presentation in both the non-fibrotic and fibrotic subtypes and could represent up to 15% of all ILDs encountered in clinical practice. However, the recognition of HP cases is essential to ensure appropriate therapy for the patient. Home health care workers' intervention is sometimes critical in this context. In case of confirmed exposure, the diagnosis could be considered with high confidence if the high-resolution computed tomography (HR-CT) shows a typical HP pattern associated with a lymphocytosis over 30% in the broncho-alveolar lavage (BAL). In all other situations, the patients should undergo further investigations and additional histopathological sampling should be considered and submitted to a multidisciplinary team discussion. After diagnosis, antigenic eviction is the rule whenever possible. Corticosteroid treatment is the first-line medical treatment for severe forms and aims to prevent the development of fibrosis. Anti-fibrotic therapy is now an option for patients with progressive ILD and failure of immunomodulatory/immunosuppressive therapies.

Diagnosis and Evaluation of Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis: CHEST Guideline and Expert Panel Report

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this analysis is to provide evidence-based and consensus-derived guidance for clinicians to improve individual diagnostic decision-making for hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP) and decrease diagnostic practice variability.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Approved panelists developed key questions regarding the diagnosis of HP using the PICO (Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome) format. MEDLINE (via PubMed) and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched for relevant literature, which was supplemented by manual searches. References were screened for inclusion, and vetted evaluation tools were used to assess the quality of included studies, to extract data, and to grade the level of evidence supporting each recommendation or statement. The quality of the evidence was assessed using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach. Graded recommendations and ungraded consensus-based statements were drafted and voted on using a modified Delphi technique to achieve consensus. A diagnostic algorithm is provided, using supporting data from the recommendations where possible, along with expert consensus to help physicians gauge the probability of HP.

RESULTS

The systematic review of the literature based on 14 PICO questions resulted in 14 key action statements: 12 evidence-based, graded recommendations and 2 ungraded consensus-based statements. All evidence was of very low quality.

INTERPRETATION

Diagnosis of HP should employ a patient-centered approach and include a multidisciplinary assessment that incorporates the environmental and occupational exposure history and CT pattern to establish diagnostic confidence prior to considering BAL and/or lung biopsy. Criteria are presented to facilitate diagnosis of HP. Additional research is needed on the performance characteristics and generalizability of exposure assessment tools and traditional and new diagnostic tests in modifying clinical decision-making for HP, particularly among those with a provisional diagnosis.

Executive Summary: Diagnosis and Evaluation of Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis: CHEST Guideline and Expert Panel Report

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this summary is to provide a synopsis of evidence-based and consensus-derived guidance for clinicians to improve individual diagnostic decision-making for hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP) and decrease diagnostic practice variability.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Approved panelists developed key questions regarding the diagnosis of HP using the PICO (Population, Intervention, Comparator, and Outcome) format. MEDLINE (via PubMed) and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched for relevant literature, which was supplemented by manual searches. References were screened for inclusion and vetted evaluation tools were used to assess the quality of included studies, to extract data, and to grade the level of evidence supporting each recommendation or statement. The quality of the evidence was assessed using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach. Graded recommendations and ungraded consensus-based statements were drafted and voted on using a modified Delphi technique to achieve consensus.

RESULTS

The systematic review of the literature based on 14 PICO questions resulted in 14 key action statements: 12 evidence-based, graded recommendations, and 2 ungraded consensus-based statements. All evidence was of very low quality.

INTERPRETATION

Diagnosis of HP should employ a patient-centered approach and include a multidisciplinary assessment that incorporates the environmental and occupational exposure history and CT pattern to establish diagnostic confidence prior to considering BAL and/or lung biopsy. Additional research is needed on the performance characteristics and generalizability of exposure assessment tools and traditional and new diagnostic tests in modifying clinical decision-making for HP, particularly among those with a provisional diagnosis.

Carbohydrate antigen 15-3 as a marker of disease severity in patients with chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis

Objective:

Biomarkers associated with mucin 1, such as Krebs von den Lungen-6 and carbohydrate antigen (CA) 15-3, are increased in various interstitial lung diseases. Our aim was to determine whether CA 15-3 could be considered a biomarker of disease severity in patients with chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis (cHP).

Methods:

This was a prospective observational study involving adult patients with cHP. Serum levels of CA 15-3 were measured and were correlated with variables related to disease severity and extension. HRCT scans were quantitatively analyzed using a computational platform and an image analysis tool (Computer Aided Lung Informatics for Pathology Evaluation and Rating). CA 15-3 levels were normalized by logarithmic transformation.

Results:

The sample comprised 41 patients. The mean age of the patients was 60.1 ± 11.6 years. The mean FVC in % of predicted was 70.3% ± 17.3%, and the median of the serum level of CA 15-3 was 48.1 U/mL. CA 15-3 levels inversely correlated with FVC in % of predicted (r = −0,30; p = 0,05), DLCO in % of predicted (r = −0,54; p < 0,01), and SpO₂ at the end of a 4-min step test (r = −0,59; p < 0,01), but they directly correlated with total quantitative HRCT scores (r = 0,47; p = 0,004), especially regarding ground-glass opacities (r = 0.58; p < 0,001).

Conclusions:

CA 15-3 is likely to be a biomarker of disease severity of patients with cHP, particularly regarding gas exchange abnormalities.

Micronodular lung disease on high-resolution CT: patterns and differential diagnosis

With the advent of high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT), micronodular lung disease is a routinely encountered pathology in thoracic imaging. This article will review how to differentiate the three main micronodular patterns and review the differential diagnosis for each. Differential diagnosis of micronodular lung disease may be extensive, but by identifying the pattern and using additional clues, such as distribution, additional imaging findings, and clinical history, a radiologist can make an accurate diagnosis. First, three micronodular patterns - centrilobular, peri-lymphatic, and random - can be identified by using a simple algorithm based on the location of nodules. This algorithm requires understanding of the anatomy and function of the secondary pulmonary lobule. Each micronodular pattern offers a unique differential diagnosis. Centrilobular nodules can be seen with inflammatory, infectious, or vascular aetiologies; peri-lymphatic nodules with sarcoidosis and lymphangitic carcinomatosis; and random nodules with haematogenous metastases or infections.

Development and Progression of Radiologic Abnormalities in Individuals at Risk for Familial Interstitial Lung Disease

Rationale: The preclinical natural history of progressive lung fibrosis is poorly understood.Objectives: Our goals were to identify risk factors for interstitial lung abnormalities (ILA) on high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) scans and to determine progression toward clinical interstitial lung disease (ILD) among subjects in a longitudinal cohort of self-reported unaffected first-degree relatives of patients with familial interstitial pneumonia.Methods: Enrollment evaluation included a health history and exposure questionnaire and HRCT scans, which were categorized by visual assessment as no ILA, early/mild ILA, or extensive ILA. The study endpoint was met when ILA were extensive or when ILD was diagnosed clinically. Among subjects with adequate study time to complete 5-year follow-up HRCT, the proportion with ILD events (endpoint met or radiographic ILA progression) was calculated.Measurements and Main Results: Among 336 subjects, the mean age was 53.1 (SD, 9.9) years. Those with ILA (early/mild [n = 74] or extensive [n = 3]) were older, were more likely to be ever smokers, had shorter peripheral blood mononuclear cell telomeres, and were more likely to carry the MUC5B risk allele. Self-reported occupational or environmental exposures, including aluminum smelting, lead, birds, and mold, were independently associated with ILA. Among 129 subjects with sufficient study time, 25 (19.4%) had an ILD event by 5 years after enrollment; of these, 12 met the study endpoint and another 13 had radiologic progression of ILA. ILD events were more common among those with early/mild ILA at enrollment (63.3% vs. 6.1%; P < 0.0001).Conclusions: Rare and common environmental exposures are independent risk factors for radiologic abnormalities. In 5 years, progression of ILA occurred in most individuals with early ILA detected at enrollment.

Hypersensitivity pneumonitis

Hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP) is a complex syndrome caused by the inhalation of a variety of antigens in susceptible and sensitized individuals. These antigens are found in the environment, mostly derived from bird proteins and fungi. The prevalence and incidence of HP vary widely depending on the intensity of exposure, the geographical area and the local climate. Immunopathologically, HP is characterized by an exaggerated humoral and cellular immune response affecting the small airways and lung parenchyma. A complex interplay of genetic, host and environmental factors underlies the development and progression of HP. HP can be classified into acute, chronic non-fibrotic and chronic fibrotic forms. Acute HP results from intermittent, high-level exposure to the inducing antigen, usually within a few hours of exposure, whereas chronic HP mostly originates from long-term, low-level exposure (usually to birds or moulds in the home), is not easy to define in terms of time, and may occur within weeks, months or even years of exposure. Some patients with fibrotic HP may evolve to a progressive phenotype, even with complete exposure avoidance. Diagnosis is based on an accurate exposure history, clinical presentation, characteristic high-resolution CT findings, specific IgG antibodies to the offending antigen, bronchoalveolar lavage and pathological features. Complete antigen avoidance is the mainstay of treatment. The pharmacotherapy of chronic HP consists of immunosuppressive drugs such as corticosteroids, with antifibrotic therapy being a potential therapy for patients with progressive disease.

Diagnosis of Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis in Adults. An Official ATS/JRS/ALAT Clinical Practice Guideline

Background: This guideline addresses the diagnosis of hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP). It represents a collaborative effort among the American Thoracic Society, Japanese Respiratory Society, and Asociación Latinoamericana del Tórax.Methods: Systematic reviews were performed for six questions. The evidence was discussed, and then recommendations were formulated by a multidisciplinary committee of experts in the field of interstitial lung disease and HP using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach.Results: The guideline committee defined HP, and clinical, radiographic, and pathological features were described. HP was classified into nonfibrotic and fibrotic phenotypes. There was limited evidence that was directly applicable to all questions. The need for a thorough history and a validated questionnaire to identify potential exposures was agreed on. Serum IgG testing against potential antigens associated with HP was suggested to identify potential exposures. For patients with nonfibrotic HP, a recommendation was made in favor of obtaining bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid for lymphocyte cellular analysis, and suggestions for transbronchial lung biopsy and surgical lung biopsy were also made. For patients with fibrotic HP, suggestions were made in favor of obtaining BAL for lymphocyte cellular analysis, transbronchial lung cryobiopsy, and surgical lung biopsy. Diagnostic criteria were established, and a diagnostic algorithm was created by expert consensus. Knowledge gaps were identified as future research directions.Conclusions: The guideline committee developed a systematic approach to the diagnosis of HP. The approach should be reevaluated as new evidence accumulates.

Fibrotic Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis: Diagnosis and Management

Fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis is a complex interstitial lung disease that is not entirely understood. In its chronic and fibrotic form, hypersensitivity pneumonitis is one of the main mimickers of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Distinguishing between these two conditions is challenging but is of particular clinical relevance. Two approved therapies are available for IPF, and a considerable number of clinical trials are now exploring newer pharmacological options. This impressive research effort is a consequence of new pathogenetic understanding, updated diagnostic criteria and a long history of pharmacological trials. Conversely, current knowledge gaps on pathogenesis of chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis, coupled with lack of validated diagnostic criteria, make the management of this disease an unsolved clinical challenge. This also reflects the paucity of therapeutic clinical trials in this field. In this review, we describe the current evidence and the possible future options to approach this complex disease.

Diagnostic approach of fibrosing interstitial lung diseases of unknown origin

Interstitial lung diseases encompass a broad range of numerous individual conditions, some of them characterized histologically by fibrosis, especially idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, nonspecific interstitial pneumonia, chronic hypersensitivity pneumonia, interstitial lung disease associated with connective tissue diseases, and unclassifiable interstitial lung disease. The diagnostic approach relies mainly on the clinical evaluation, especially assessment of the patient's demographics, history, smoking habits, occupational or domestic exposures, use of drugs, and on interpretation of high-quality HRCT of the chest. Imaging is key to the initial diagnostic approach, and often can confirm a definite diagnosis, particularly a diagnosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis when showing a pattern of usual interstitial pneumonia in the appropriate context. In other cases, chest HRCT may orientate toward an alternative diagnosis and appropriate investigations to confirm the suspected diagnosis. Autoimmune serology helps diagnosing connective disease. Indications for bronchoalveolar lavage and for lung biopsy progressively become more restrictive, with better considerations for their discriminate value, of the potential risk associated with the procedure, and of the anticipated impact on management. Innovative techniques and genetics are beginning to contribute to diagnosing interstitial lung disease and to be implemented routinely in the clinic. Multidisciplinary discussion, enabling interaction between pulmonologists, chest radiologists, pathologists and often other healthcare providers, allows integration of all information available. It increases the accuracy of diagnosis and prognosis prediction, proposes a first-choice diagnosis, may suggest additional investigations, and often informs the management. The concept of working diagnosis, which can be revised upon additional information being made available especially longitudinal disease behaviour, helps dealing with diagnostic uncertainty inherent to interstitial lung diseases and facilitates management decisions. Above all, the clinical approach and how thoroughly the patient's history and possible exposures are assessed determine the possibility of an accurate diagnosis.

Connective Tissue Disease-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease: Evaluation and Management

Interstitial lung disease is common among patients with connective tissue disease and is an important contributor to morbidity and mortality. Infection and drug toxicity must always be excluded as the cause of radiographic findings. Immunosuppression remains a mainstay of therapy despite few controlled trials supporting its use. When a decision regarding therapy initiation is made, considerations include an assessment of disease severity as well as a determination of the rate of progression. Because patients may have extrathoracic disease activity, a multidisciplinary approach is crucial and should include supportive and nonpharmacologic management strategies.

Current Diagnosis and Management of Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis

Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis (HP) one of the most common interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) is characterized by exposure to an inhaled inciting antigen that leads to a host immunologic reaction determining interstitial inflammation and architectural distortion. The underlying pathogenetic mechanisms are unclear. The absence of international shared diagnostic guidelines and the lack of a "gold-standard" test for HP combined with the presence of several clinical and radiologic overlapping features makes it particularly challenging to differentiate HP from other ILDs, also in expert contests. Radiology is playing a more crucial role in this process; recently the headcheese sign was recognized as a more specific for chronic-HP than the extensive mosaic attenuation. Several classification proposals and diagnostic models have been advanced by different groups, with no prospective validation. Therapeutic options for HP have been limited to antigen avoidance and immunosuppressant drugs over the last decades. Several questions about this condition remain unanswered and there is a need for more studies.

Chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis in the southeastern United States: an assessment of how clinicians reached the diagnosis

Background

Chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis (cHP) is a disease caused by exposure to inhaled environmental antigens. Diagnosis of cHP is influenced by the awareness of the disease prevalence, which varies significantly in different regions, and how clinicians utilize relevant clinical information. We conducted a retrospective study to evaluate how clinicians in the Southeast United States, where the climate is humid favoring mold growth, diagnosed cHP using items identified in the international modified Delphi survey of experts, i.e., environmental exposure, CT imaging and lung pathology,

Methods

We searched Duke University Medical Center database for patients over the age of 18 with a diagnosis of cHP (ICD-9 code: 495) between Jan. 1, 2008 to Dec. 31, 2013 using a query tool, Duke Enterprise Data Unified Content Explorer (DEDUCE).

Results

Five hundred patients were identified and 261 patients had cHP confirmed in clinic notes by a pulmonologist or an allergist. About half of the patients lived in the Research Triangle area where our medical center is located, giving an estimated prevalence rate of 6.5 per 100,000 persons. An exposure source was mentioned in 69.3% of the patient. The most common exposure sources were environmental molds (43.1%) and birds (26.0%). We used Venn diagram to evaluate how the patients met the three most common cHP diagnostic criteria: evidence of environmental exposures (history or precipitin) (E), chest CT imaging (C) and pathology from lung biopsies (P). Eighteen patients (6.9%) met none of three criteria. Of the remaining 243 patients, 135 patients (55.6%) had one (E 35.0%, C 3.3%, P 17.3%), 81 patients (33.3%) had two (E + C 12.3%, E + P 17.3%, C + P 4.9%), and 27 patients (11.1%) had all three criteria (E + C + P). Overall, 49.4% of patients had pathology from lung biopsy compared to 31.6% with CT scan.

Conclusions

Environmental mold was the most common exposure for cHP in the Southeast United States. Lung pathology was available in more than half of cHP cases in our tertiary care center, perhaps reflecting the complexity of referrals. Differences in exposure sources and referral patterns should be considered in devising future diagnostic pathways or guidelines for cHP.

The value of serum precipitins against specific antigens in patients diagnosed with hypersensitivity pneumonitis - retrospective study

INTRODUCTION

Hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP) is the third most common interstitial lung disease, and is often under-recognized, especially in patients who are not aware of their occupational or environmental contact with organic antigens. The aim of the present study was to assess the results of serum specific IgG antibodies (ssIgG) in HP patients and their correlation with clinical data.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

128 HP patients, median age 53 years, participated in the study. The control group consisted of 102 patients with interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) other than HP. Assessment of pretreatment ssIgG to thermophilic actinomycetes and protein antigens from bird droppings (pigeons, hens, ducks, parrots, turkeys) was performed by double diffusion in agar gel according to Ouchterlony method.

RESULTS

Positive precipitins were obtained in 57% of all HP patients and in 61% of those exposed to above mentioned antigens. Positive results in the control group were obtained in 7% of patients. Sensitivity of ssIgG in HP group was 0.57 and specificity 0.93. Precipitins to at least one bird antigen was confirmed in 64% of HP patients exposed to birds. Precipitins to thermophilic bacteria were found in 29% of HP patients exposed to hay or hay products.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the study indicate that ssIgG against birds' allergens were the valuable diagnostic tool in HP patients. Low-rate of confirmation of ssIgG to thermophilic bacteria in patients exposed to hay or hay products indicate that other microorganisms, most likely molds, could be responsible for the disease development.

Usefulness of new diagnostic criteria for chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis established on the basis of a Delphi survey: A Japanese cohort study

BACKGROUND

Chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis (CHP) is a fibrotic interstitial lung disease (ILD) caused by repeated exposure to a variety of organic particles. In November 2017, new criteria for CHP diagnosis were proposed by Morisset et al. based on a modified Delphi survey of ILD experts. However, it remains unclear whether these criteria are useful to accurately diagnose CHP. We aimed to evaluate the newly proposed CHP diagnostic criteria.

METHODS

We retrospectively applied Morisset's CHP diagnostic criteria to consecutive Japanese patients who underwent surgical lung biopsy for diagnosis of ILD from 2008 to 2015. All patients underwent bronchoalveolar lavage and pulmonary function testing. Patients who had connective tissue disease complications or showed an acute or subacute disease onset were excluded.

RESULTS

A total of 251 patients were included. The diagnoses based on multidisciplinary discussion (MDD) were CHP (n = 27), idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (n = 117), unclassifiable interstitial pneumonia (IP) (n = 65), and other diagnoses (n = 42). Of the 27 MDD-CHP patients, 14 were classified as a CHP group with diagnostic confidence >50% and 13 were not categorized (sensitivity, 51.9%; specificity, 77.7%). Morisset's CHP diagnostic criteria could help avoid SLB for the diagnosis of CHP in seven patients. Of the 13 MDD-CHP patients who were not categorized in the CHP group with diagnostic confidence >50%, the reason for the exclusion was an inconsistent with UIP pattern without CHP features.

CONCLUSIONS

Half of the MDD-CHP patients were diagnosed with CHP using Morisset's CHP diagnostic criteria. Further investigation will be important for developing improved diagnostic criteria for CHP.

Variable utility of mosaic attenuation to distinguish fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis from idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

BACKGROUND

Mosaic attenuation on computed tomography (CT) has been identified in international guidelines as an important diagnostic feature of fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis (FHP) as opposed to idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). However, mosaic attenuation comprises several different radiological signs (low-density lobules, preserved lobules, air trapping and the so-called "headcheese sign") which may have differing diagnostic utility. Furthermore, the extent of mosaic attenuation required to distinguish these two diagnoses is uncertain and thresholds of mosaic attenuation from international guidelines have not been validated.

METHODS

Inspiratory and expiratory CT scans were evaluated by two readers in 102 patients (IPF n=57; FHP n=45) using a semiquantitative scoring system for mosaic attenuation. Findings were validated in an external cohort from a secondary referral institution (IPF n=34; FHP n=28).

RESULTS

Low-density lobules and air trapping were a frequent finding in IPF, present in up to 51% of patients. A requirement for increasing extent of low-density lobules and air trapping based on guidelines (American Thoracic Society and Fleischner Society) was associated with increased specificity for the diagnosis of FHP (0.96 and 0.98, respectively) but reduced sensitivity (0.16 and 0.20, respectively). The headcheese sign was found to be highly specific (0.93) and moderately sensitive (0.49) for a high-confidence diagnosis of FHP. The high specificity of the headcheese sign was maintained in the validation cohort and when patients with other CT features of FHP were excluded.

CONCLUSION

Mosaic attenuation is a frequent finding in IPF. However, the headcheese sign can be confidently considered as being inconsistent with a diagnosis of IPF and specific for FHP.

Differential diagnoses of fibrosing lung diseases

OBJECTIVES

To describe the challenges inherent in diagnosing fibrosing lung diseases (FLD) on CT imaging and methodologies by which the diagnostic process may be simplified.

METHODS

Extensive searches in online scientific databases were performed to provide relevant and contemporary evidence that describe the current state of knowledge related to FLD diagnosis. This includes descriptions of the utility of a working diagnosis for an individual case discussed in a multidisciplinary team (MDT) setting and challenges associated with the lack of consensus guidelines for diagnosing chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis.

RESULTS

As well as describing imaging features that indicate the presence of a fibrosing lung disease, those CT characteristics that nuance a diagnosis of the various FLDs are considered. The review also explains the essential information that a radiologist needs to convey to an MDT when reading a CT scan. Lastly, we provide some insights as to the future directions the field make take in the upcoming years.

CONCLUSIONS

This review outlines the current state of FLD diagnosis and emphasizes areas where knowledge is limited, and more evidence is required. Fundamentally, however, it provides a guide for radiologists when tackling CT imaging in a patient with FLD.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

This review encompasses advice from recent guideline statements and evidence from the latest studies in FLD to provide an up-to-date manual for radiologists to aid the diagnosis of FLD on CT imaging in an MDT setting.

Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis: Radiologic Phenotypes Are Associated With Distinct Survival Time and Pulmonary Function Trajectory

BACKGROUND

Hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP) is an interstitial lung disease with a better prognosis, on average, than idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). We compare survival time and pulmonary function trajectory in patients with HP and IPF by radiologic phenotype.

METHODS

HP (n = 117) was diagnosed if surgical/transbronchial lung biopsy, BAL, and exposure history results suggested this diagnosis. IPF (n = 152) was clinically and histopathologically diagnosed. All participants had a baseline high-resolution CT (HRCT) scan and FVC % predicted. Three thoracic radiologists documented radiologic features. Survival time is from HRCT scan to death or lung transplant. Cox proportional hazards models identify variables associated with survival time. Linear mixed models compare post-HRCT scan FVC % predicted trajectories.

RESULTS

Subjects were grouped by clinical diagnosis and three mutually exclusive radiologic phenotypes: honeycomb present, non-honeycomb fibrosis (traction bronchiectasis and reticulation) present, and nonfibrotic. Nonfibrotic HP had the longest event-free median survival (> 14.73 years) and improving FVC % predicted (1.92%; 95% CI, 0.49-3.35; P = .009). HP with non-honeycomb fibrosis had longer survival than IPF (> 7.95 vs 5.20 years), and both groups experienced a significant decline in FVC % predicted. Subjects with HP and IPF with honeycombing had poor survival (2.76 and 2.81 years, respectively) and significant decline in FVC % predicted.

CONCLUSIONS

Three prognostically distinct, radiologically defined phenotypes are identified among patients with HP. The importance of pursuing a specific diagnosis (eg, HP vs IPF) among patients with non-honeycomb fibrosis is highlighted. When radiologic honeycombing is present, invasive diagnostic testing directed at determining the diagnosis may be of limited value given a uniformly poor prognosis.