Inhaled aztreonam improves symptoms of cough and sputum production in patients with bronchiectasis: a post hoc analysis of the AIR-BX studies

Inhaled Medications for Maintenance Therapy in Pediatric Noncystic Fibrosis Bronchiectasis

OBJECTIVE

This review focuses on evaluating literature for the use of inhaled mucolytics (hypertonic saline, mannitol, and dornase alfa), inhaled antibiotics (tobramycin, aztreonam, colistin, and amikacin), and inhaled corticosteroids in pediatric noncystic fibrosis bronchiectasis.

DATA SOURCES

A literature search via PubMed was conducted using the search terms "non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis," "primary ciliary dyskinesia," and "bronchiectasis" in combination with each inhaled agent of interest.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

Studies were included if they were specific to patients with a clinical diagnosis of noncystic fibrosis bronchiectasis published from 1998 to July 2024.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Several inhaled medications can be considered as maintenance therapies for pediatric patients with noncystic fibrosis bronchiectasis. Hypertonic saline could be considered for its potential airway clearance benefits and low risk of causing harm. Inhaled antipseudomonal antibiotics should be considered in patients who are colonized with Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Inhaled corticosteroid therapy should be reserved for patients with concomitant asthma. Dornase alfa has shown worse outcomes in adults with noncystic fibrosis bronchiectasis and should be used with caution. Risks and benefits should be carefully considered when evaluating these therapies for use in noncystic fibrosis bronchiectasis, and patient-specific treatment regimens should be developed.

RELEVANCE TO PATIENT CARE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE

Chronic management of pediatric noncystic fibrosis bronchiectasis remains challenging due to paucity of applicable literature. Risks and benefits of different agents are discussed in this article with recommendations for application to clinical practice based on studies performed in both adult and pediatric patients with noncystic fibrosis bronchiectasis.

CONCLUSION

Several inhaled medications could be considered as maintenance therapies for pediatric patients with noncystic fibrosis bronchiectasis, with more robust evidence to support use of inhaled antipseudomonal antibiotics and hypertonic saline compared with other available agents. Further investigation is needed to identify a clear place in therapy for inhaled therapies in pediatric noncystic fibrosis bronchiectasis.

Therapeutic Interventions for Pseudomonas Infections in Cystic Fibrosis Patients: A Review of Phase IV Trials

Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Pa) poses a significant threat to individuals with cystic fibrosis (CF), as this bacterium is highly adaptable and resistant to antibiotics. While early-stage Pa infections can often be eradicated with aggressive antibiotic therapy, chronic infections are nearly impossible to eliminate and require treatments that focus on long-term bacterial suppression. Without such suppression, these persistent infections can severely damage the lungs, leading to serious complications and a reduced life expectancy for CF patients. Evidence for a specific treatment regimen for managing Pa infections in CF patients remains limited. This narrative review provides a detailed analysis of antimicrobial therapies assessed in completed phase IV trials, focusing on their safety and efficacy, especially with prolonged use. Key antibiotics, including tobramycin, colistin, meropenem, aztreonam, ceftolozane/tazobactam, ciprofloxacin, and azithromycin, are discussed, emphasizing their use, side effects, and delivery methods. Inhaled antibiotics are preferred for their targeted action and minimal side effects, while systemic antibiotics offer potency but carry risks like nephrotoxicity. The review also explores emerging treatments, such as phage therapy and antibiofilm agents, which show promise in managing chronic infections. Nonetheless, further research is necessary to enhance the safety and effectiveness of existing therapies while investigating new approaches for better long-term outcomes.

Inhaled colistimethate sodium in patients with bronchiectasis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection: results of PROMIS-I and PROMIS-II, two randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trials assessing safety and efficacy over 12 months

BACKGROUND

Chronic lung infection with Pseudomonas aeruginosa is associated with increased exacerbations and mortality in people with bronchiectasis. The PROMIS-I and PROMIS-II trials investigated the efficacy and safety of 12-months of inhaled colistimethate sodium delivered via the I-neb.

METHODS

Two randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of twice per day colistimethate sodium versus placebo were conducted in patients with bronchiectasis with P aeruginosa and a history of at least two exacerbations requiring oral antibiotics or one requiring intravenous antibiotics in the previous year in hospitals in Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Greece, Israel, Italy, Netherlands, New Zealand, Poland, Portugal, Spain, Switzerland, the UK, and the USA. Randomisation was conducted through an interactive web response system and stratified by site and long term use of macrolides. Masking was achieved by providing colistimethate sodium and placebo in identical vials. After random assignment, study visits were scheduled for 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months (the end of the treatment period); and telephone calls were scheduled for 7 days after random assignment and 2 weeks after the end of treatment. The primary endpoint was the mean annual exacerbation rate. These trials are registered with EudraCT: number 2015-002743-33 (for PROMIS-I) and 2016-004558-13 (for PROMIS-II), and are now completed.

FINDINGS

377 patients were randomly assigned in PROMIS-I (177 to colistimethate sodium and 200 to placebo; in the modified intention-to-treat population, 176 were in the colistimethate sodium group and 197 were in the placebo group) between June 6, 2017, and April 8, 2020. The annual exacerbation rate was 0·58 in the colistimethate sodium group versus 0·95 in the placebo group (rate ratio 0·61; 95% CI 0·46-0·82; p=0·0010). 287 patients were randomly assigned in PROMIS-II (152 were assigned to colistimethate sodium and 135 were assigned to placebo, in the modified intention-to-treat population), between Feb 12, 2018, and Oct 22, 2021. PROMIS-II was then prematurely terminated due to the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic. No significant difference was observed in the annual exacerbation rate between the colistimethate sodium and placebo groups (0·89 vs 0·89; rate ratio 1·00; 95% CI 0·75-1·35; p=0·98). No major safety issues were identified. The overall frequency of adverse events was 142 (81%) patients in the colistimethate sodium group versus 159 (81%) patients in the placebo group in PROMIS-I, and 123 (81%) patients versus 104 (77%) patients in PROMIS-II. There were no deaths related to study treatment.

INTERPRETATION

The data from PROMIS-I suggest a clinically important benefit of colistimethate sodium delivered via the I-neb adaptive aerosol delivery system in patients with bronchiectasis and P aeruginosa infection. These results were not replicated in PROMIS-II, which was affected by the COVID-19 pandemic and prematurely terminated.

FUNDING

Zambon.

Inhaled heparin: Past, present, and future

While heparin has traditionally served as a key anticoagulant in clinical practice for nearly a century, recent years have witnessed a growing interest in its role as a potent antiinflammatory and antiviral agent, as well as an anticancer agent. To address challenges with injection-based delivery, exploring patient-friendly routes such as oral and pulmonary delivery is crucial. This review specifically highlights the multiple therapeutic benefits of inhaled heparin. In summary, this review serves as a valuable source of information, providing deep insights into the diverse therapeutic advantages of inhaled heparin and its potential applications within clinical contexts.

The Efficacy and Safety of Inhaled Antibiotics for the Treatment of Bronchiectasis in Adults: Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Inhaled antibiotics are recommended conditionally by international bronchiectasis guidelines for the treatment of patients with bronchiectasis, but results of individual studies are inconsistent. A previous meta-analysis demonstrated promising results regarding the efficacy and safety of inhaled antibiotics in bronchiectasis. Subsequent publications have supplemented the existing body of evidence further in this area.

RESEARCH QUESTION

To what extent do inhaled antibiotics demonstrate both efficacy and safety as a treatment option for adults with bronchiectasis?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of inhaled antibiotics in adult patients with bronchiectasis. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov for eligible studies. Studies were included if they enrolled adults with bronchiectasis diagnosed by CT imaging and had a treatment duration of at least 4 weeks. The primary end point was exacerbation frequency, with additional key efficacy end points including severe exacerbations, bacterial load, symptoms, quality of life, and FEV1. Data were pooled through random-effects meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Twenty studies involving 3,468 patients were included. Inhaled antibiotics were associated with reduced number of patients with exacerbations (risk ratio, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.75-0.96), a slight reduction in exacerbation frequency (rate ratio [RR], 0.78; 95% CI, 0.68-0.91), a probable reduction in the frequency of severe exacerbations (RR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.31-0.74), and a likely slight increase in time to first exacerbation (hazard ratio, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.68-0.94). Inhaled antibiotics likely lead to a slight increase in the Quality of Life Questionnaire-Bronchiectasis respiratory symptom score (mean difference, 2.51; 95% CI, 0.44-4.31) and may reduce scores on the St. George Respiratory Questionnaire (mean difference, -3.13; 95% CI, -5.93 to -0.32). Bacterial load consistently was reduced, but FEV1 was not changed with treatment. Evidence suggests little to no difference in adverse effects between groups (OR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.75-1.30). Antibiotic-resistant organisms likely were increased by treatment.

INTERPRETATION

In this systematic review and meta-analysis, inhaled antibiotics resulted in a slight reduction in exacerbations, a probable reduction in severe exacerbations, and a likely slight improvement in symptoms and quality of life in adults with bronchiectasis.

TRIAL REGISTRY

International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews; No.: CRD42023384694; URL: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/.

Biomarkers in bronchiectasis

Bronchiectasis is a heterogeneous disease with multiple aetiologies and diverse clinical features. There is a general consensus that optimal treatment requires precision medicine approaches focused on specific treatable disease characteristics, known as treatable traits. Identifying subtypes of conditions with distinct underlying biology (endotypes) depends on the identification of biomarkers that are associated with disease features, prognosis or treatment response and which can be applied in clinical practice. Bronchiectasis is a disease characterised by inflammation, infection, structural lung damage and impaired mucociliary clearance. Increasingly there are available methods to measure each of these components of the disease, revealing heterogeneous inflammatory profiles, microbiota, radiology and mucus and epithelial biology in patients with bronchiectasis. Using emerging biomarkers and omics technologies to guide treatment in bronchiectasis is a promising field of research. Here we review the most recent data on biomarkers in bronchiectasis.

Bronchiectasis management in adults: state of the art and future directions

Formerly regarded as a rare disease, bronchiectasis is increasingly recognised. A renewed interest in this disease has led to significant progress in bronchiectasis research. Randomised clinical trials (RCTs) have demonstrated the benefits of airway clearance techniques, inhaled antibiotics and long-term macrolide therapy in bronchiectasis patients. However, the heterogeneity of bronchiectasis remains one of the most challenging aspects of management. Phenotypes and endotypes of bronchiectasis have been identified to help find "treatable traits" and partially overcome disease complexity. The goals of therapy for bronchiectasis are to reduce the symptom burden, improve quality of life, reduce exacerbations and prevent disease progression. We review the pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments that can improve mucociliary clearance, reduce airway inflammation and tackle airway infection, the key pathophysiological features of bronchiectasis. There are also promising treatments in development for the management of bronchiectasis, including novel anti-inflammatory therapies. This review provides a critical update on the management of bronchiectasis focusing on treatable traits and recent RCTs.

Objective sputum colour assessment and clinical outcomes in bronchiectasis: data from the European Bronchiectasis Registry (EMBARC)

BACKGROUND

A validated 4-point sputum colour chart can be used to objectively evaluate the levels of airway inflammation in bronchiectasis patients. In the European Bronchiectasis Registry (EMBARC), we tested whether sputum colour would be associated with disease severity and clinical outcomes.

METHODS

We used a prospective, observational registry of adults with bronchiectasis conducted in 31 countries. Patients who did not produce spontaneous sputum were excluded from the analysis. The Murray sputum colour chart was used at baseline and at follow-up visits. Key outcomes were frequency of exacerbations, hospitalisations for severe exacerbations and mortality during up to 5-year follow-up.

RESULTS

13 484 patients were included in the analysis. More purulent sputum was associated with lower forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), worse quality of life, greater bacterial infection and a higher bronchiectasis severity index. Sputum colour was strongly associated with the risk of future exacerbations during follow-up. Compared to patients with mucoid sputum (reference group), patients with mucopurulent sputum experienced significantly more exacerbations (incident rate ratio (IRR) 1.29, 95% CI 1.22-1.38; p<0.0001), while the rates were even higher for patients with purulent (IRR 1.55, 95% CI 1.44-1.67; p<0.0001) and severely purulent sputum (IRR 1.91, 95% CI 1.52-2.39; p<0.0001). Hospitalisations for severe exacerbations were also associated with increasing sputum colour with rate ratios, compared to patients with mucoid sputum, of 1.41 (95% CI 1.29-1.56; p<0.0001), 1.98 (95% CI 1.77-2.21; p<0.0001) and 3.05 (95% CI 2.25-4.14; p<0.0001) for mucopurulent, purulent and severely purulent sputum, respectively. Mortality was significantly increased with increasing sputum purulence, hazard ratio 1.12 (95% CI 1.01-1.24; p=0.027), for each increment in sputum purulence.

CONCLUSION

Sputum colour is a simple marker of disease severity and future risk of exacerbations, severe exacerbations and mortality in patients with bronchiectasis.

Quality-of-Life Bronchiectasis Respiratory Symptom Scale Predicts the Risk of Exacerbations in Adults with Bronchiectasis: A Prospective Observational Study

Rationale: The relationship between symptoms, measured using a validated disease-specific questionnaire, and longitudinal exacerbation risk has not been demonstrated in bronchiectasis. Objectives: The aim of this study is to investigate whether baseline symptoms, assessed using the Quality-of-Life Bronchiectasis Respiratory Symptom Scale (QoL-B-RSS) and its individual component scores, could predict future exacerbation risk in patients with bronchiectasis. Methods: The study included 436 adults with bronchiectasis from three tertiary hospitals. Symptoms were measured using the QoL-B-RSS, with scores ranging from 0 to 100, where lower scores indicated more severe symptoms. We examined whether symptoms as continuous measures were associated with the risk of exacerbation over 12 months. The analysis was also repeated for individual components of the QoL-B-RSS score. Results: The baseline QoL-B-RSS score was associated with an increased risk of exacerbations (rate ratio, 1.25 for each 10-point decrease; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.15-1.35; P < 0.001), hospitalizations (rate ratio, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.05-1.43; P = 0.02), and reduced time to the first exacerbation (hazard ratio, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.03-1.21; P = 0.01) over 12 months, even after adjusting for relevant confounders, including exacerbation history. The QoL-B-RSS score was comparable to exacerbation history in its association with future frequent exacerbations (defined as three or more exacerbations per year) and hospitalization (area under the curve, 0.86 vs. 0.84; P = 0.46; and area under the curve, 0.81 vs. 0.83; P = 0.41, respectively). Moreover, patients with more severe symptoms in the majority of individual components of the QoL-B-RSS were more likely to experience exacerbations. Conclusions: Symptoms can serve as useful indicators for identifying patients at increased risk of exacerbation in bronchiectasis. Beyond relying solely on exacerbation history, a comprehensive assessment of symptoms could facilitate timely and cost-effective implementation of interventions for exacerbation prevention.

Basic, translational and clinical aspects of bronchiectasis in adults

Bronchiectasis is a common progressive respiratory disease with recognisable radiological abnormalities and a clinical syndrome of cough, sputum production and recurrent respiratory infections. Inflammatory cell infiltration into the lung, in particular neutrophils, is central to the pathophysiology of bronchiectasis. Herein we explore the roles and relationships between infection, inflammation and mucociliary clearance dysfunction in the establishment and progression of bronchiectasis. Microbial and host-mediated damage are important processes underpinning bronchiectasis and the relative contribution of proteases, cytokines and inflammatory mediators to the propagation of inflammation is presented. We also discuss the emerging concept of inflammatory endotypes, defined by the presence of neutrophilic and eosinophilic inflammation, and explore the role of inflammation as a treatable trait. Current treatment for bronchiectasis focuses on treatment of underlying causes, enhancing mucociliary clearance, controlling infection and preventing and treating complications. Data on airway clearance approaches via exercise and mucoactive drugs, pharmacotherapy with macrolides to decrease exacerbations and the usefulness of inhaled antibiotics and bronchodilators are discussed, finishing with a look to the future where new therapies targeting host-mediated immune dysfunction hold promise.

Clinimetric Properties of Outcome Measures in Bronchiectasis

Rationale: There is a lack of outcome measures with robust clinimetric properties in bronchiectasis. Objectives: To determine the clinimetric properties (reliability over 1 year during clinical stability and responsiveness over the course of antibiotics for pulmonary exacerbation) of objective and patient-reported outcome measures. Methods: This multicenter cohort study included adults with bronchiectasis from seven hospitals in the United Kingdom. Participants attended four visits, 4 months apart over 1 year while clinically stable and at the beginning and end of exacerbation and completed lung function (spirometry and multiple breath washout), provided a blood sample for C-reactive protein (CRP) measurement, and completed health-related quality of life (HRQoL) questionnaires (Quality of Life-Bronchiectasis, St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire, and EuroQoL 5-Dimensions 5-Levels). Results: Participants (n = 132) had a mean (standard deviation) age of 66 (11) years, and 64% were female. Lung function parameters (forced expiratory volume in one second [FEV1], standard lung clearance index [LCI2.5]) were reliable over time [coefficient of variation (CV): <10%]). Regarding responsiveness, FEV1 demonstrated better properties than LCI2.5; therefore, a clear justification for the use of LCI2.5 in future trials is needed. CRP was less reliable (CV > 20%) over time than FEV1 and LCI2.5, and whereas CRP had a large mean change between the start and end of an exacerbation, this may have been driven by a small number of patients having a large change in CRP. Reliability of HRQoL questionnaires and questionnaire domains ranged from acceptable (CV: 20-30%) to good (CV: 10-20%), and HRQoL were responsive to treatment of exacerbations. Considering the specific questionnaire domain relevant to the intervention and its associated clinimetric properties is important. Additional statistics will support future power and/or sample size analysis. Conclusions: This information on the clinimetric properties of lung function parameters, CRP, and HRQoL parameters should be used to inform the choice of outcome measures used in future bronchiectasis trials.

Towards development of evidence to inform recommendations for the evaluation and management of bronchiectasis

Bronchiectasis (BE) is a chronic condition characterized by airway dilation as a consequence of a variety of pathogenic processes. It is often associated with persistent airway infection and an inflammatory response resulting in cough productive of purulent sputum, which has an adverse impact on quality of life. The prevalence of BE is increasing worldwide. Treatment guidelines exist for managing BE, but they are generally informed by a paucity of high-quality evidence. This review presents the findings of a scientific advisory board of experts held in the United States in November 2020. The main focus of the meeting was to identify unmet needs in BE and propose ways to identify research priorities for the management of BE, with a view to developing evidence-based treatment recommendations. Key issues identified include diagnosis, patient evaluation, promoting airway clearance and appropriate use of antimicrobials. Unmet needs include effective pharmacological agents to promote airway clearance and reduce inflammation, control of chronic infection, clinical endpoints to be used in the design of BE clinical trials, and more accurate classification of patients using phenotypes and endotypes to better guide treatment decisions and improve outcomes.

Application of Precise Positioning for Sputum Expectoration in ICU Patients with Pulmonary Infection

Objective

To determine the application value of precise positioning for sputum expectoration in intensive care unit (ICU) hospitalized patients with pulmonary infection (PI).

Methods

A total of 183 patients with PI treated in the ICUs of Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University from June 2019 to June 2020 were divided into a control group (n = 91) and an observation group (n = 92), all of whom received conventional drug therapy. The control group was given routine nursing intervention, based on which, the observation group was supplemented with precise positioning for sputum expectoration. The 24-hour sputum volume, respiratory rate (RR), blood gas analysis indexes, inflammatory indicators, Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score (CPIS), Modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnea scale score, and quality of life (36-Item Short-Form Health Survey, SF-36) were observed in both arms before and after intervention. The incidence of adverse reactions was counted.

Results

The observation group showed better mMRC scores than the control group (P < 0.05). Compared with the control group, the sputum volume, RR, and CPIS score were lower, and the SF-36 score was higher in the observation group 7 days after intervention (P < 0.05). After intervention, the oxygen saturation (SaO2) and partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2) were higher, while the carbon dioxide partial pressure (PaCO2), C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT), and leukocyte count were lower in the observation group compared with the control group (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of complications between the two arms (P > 0.05).

Conclusion

The application of precise positioning for sputum expectoration in nursing intervention of ICU patients with PI can alleviate the severity of PI and dyspnea, reduce inflammatory reaction, and improve the quality of life of patients.

Precision medicine in bronchiectasis

Bronchiectasis, due to its highly heterogenous nature, requires an individualised approach to therapy. Patients experience symptoms and exacerbations driven by a combination of impaired mucociliary clearance, airway inflammation and airway infection. Treatment of bronchiectasis aims to enhance airway clearance and to address the underlying causes of inflammation and infection susceptibility. Bronchiectasis has multiple causes and so the pathophysiology leading to individual symptoms and exacerbations are different between individuals. Standardised investigations are recommended by international guidelines to identify the underlying causes of bronchiectasis. The process of identifying the underlying biology within an individual is called “endotyping” and is an emerging concept across chronic diseases. Endotypes that have a specific treatment are referred to as “treatable traits” and a treatable traits approach to managing patients with bronchiectasis in a holistic and evidence-based manner is the key to improved outcomes. Bronchiectasis is an area of intense research. Endotyping allows identification of subsets of patients to allow medicines to be tested differently in the future where trials, rather than trying to achieve a “one size fits all” solution, can test efficacy in subsets of patients where the treatment is most likely to be efficacious.

Bronchiectasis, due to its highly heterogenous nature, requires an individualised approach to therapy. Treatment targets symptoms and exacerbations by aiming to improve mucociliary clearance and to reduce airway inflammation and airway infection.https://bit.ly/3ite4B2

Psychometric Validation of the German Translation of the Quality of Life Questionnaire-Bronchiectasis (QOL-B)-Data from the German Bronchiectasis Registry PROGNOSIS

Patients with bronchiectasis feature considerable symptom burden and reduced health-related quality of life (QOL). We provide the psychometric validation of the German translation of the disease-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire-Bronchiectasis (QOL-B), version 3.1, using baseline data of adults consecutively enrolled into the prospective German bronchiectasis registry PROGNOSIS. Overall, 904 patients with evaluable QOL-B scores were included. We observed no relevant floor or ceiling effects. Internal consistency was good to excellent (Cronbach’s α ≥0.73 for each scale). QOL-B scales discriminated between patients based on prior pulmonary exacerbations and hospitalizations, breathlessness, bronchiectasis severity index, lung function, sputum volume, Pseudomonas aeruginosa status and the need for regular pharmacotherapy, except for Social Functioning, Vitality and Emotional Functioning scales. We observed moderate to strong convergence between several measures of disease severity and QOL-B scales, except for Social and Emotional Functioning. Two-week test-retest reliability was good, with intraclass correlation coefficients ≥0.84 for each scale. Minimal clinical important difference ranged between 8.5 for the Respiratory Symptoms and 14.1 points for the Social Functioning scale. Overall, the German translation of the QOL-B, version 3.1, has good validity and test-retest reliability among a nationally representative adult bronchiectasis cohort. However, responsiveness of QOL-B scales require further investigation during registry follow-up.

Intermittent prophylactic antibiotics for bronchiectasis

BACKGROUND

Bronchiectasis is a common but under-diagnosed chronic disorder characterised by permanent dilation of the airways arising from a cycle of recurrent infection and inflammation. Symptoms including chronic, persistent cough and productive phlegm are a significant burden for people with bronchiectasis, and the main aim of treatment is to reduce exacerbation frequency and improve quality of life. Prophylactic antibiotic therapy aims to break this infection cycle and is recommended by clinical guidelines for adults with three or more exacerbations a year, based on limited evidence. It is important to weigh the evidence for bacterial suppression against the prevention of antibiotic resistance and further evidence is required on the safety and efficacy of different regimens of intermittently administered antibiotic treatments for people with bronchiectasis.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of intermittent prophylactic antibiotics in the treatment of adults and children with bronchiectasis.

SEARCH METHODS

We identified trials from the Cochrane Airways Trials Register, which contains studies identified through multiple electronic searches and handsearches of other sources. We also searched trial registries and reference lists of primary studies. We conducted searches on 6 September 2021, with no restriction on language of publication.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of at least three months' duration comparing an intermittent regime of prophylactic antibiotics with placebo, usual care or an alternate intermittent regimen. Intermittent prophylactic administration was defined as repeated courses of antibiotics with on-treatment and off-treatment intervals of at least 14 days' duration. We included adults and children with a clinical diagnosis of bronchiectasis confirmed by high resolution computed tomography (HRCT), plain film chest radiograph, or bronchography and a documented history of recurrent chest infections. We excluded studies where participants received high dose antibiotics immediately prior to enrolment or those with a diagnosis of cystic fibrosis, allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA), primary ciliary dyskinesia, hypogammaglobulinaemia, sarcoidosis, or a primary diagnosis of COPD. Our primary outcomes were exacerbation frequency and serious adverse events. We did not exclude studies on the basis of review outcomes.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We analysed dichotomous data as odds ratios (ORs) or relative risk (RRs) and continuous data as mean differences (MDs) or standardised mean differences (SMDs). We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. We conducted GRADE assessments for the following primary outcomes: exacerbation frequency; serious adverse events and secondary outcomes: antibiotic resistance; hospital admissions; health-related quality of life.

MAIN RESULTS

We included eight RCTs, with interventions ranging from 16 to 48 weeks, involving 2180 adults. All evaluated one of three types of antibiotics over two to six cycles of 28 days on/off treatment: aminoglycosides, ß-lactams or fluoroquinolones. Two studies also included 12 cycles of 14 days on/off treatment with fluoroquinolones. Participants had a mean age of 63.6 years, 65% were women and approximately 85% Caucasian. Baseline FEV₁ ranged from 55.5% to 62.6% predicted. None of the studies included children. Generally, there was a low risk of bias in the included studies. Antibiotic versus placebo: cycle of 14 days on/off. Ciprofloxacin reduced the frequency of exacerbations compared to placebo (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.93; I² = 65%; 2 studies, 469 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), with eight people (95% CI 6 to 28) needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome. The intervention increased the risk of antibiotic resistance more than twofold (OR 2.14, 95% CI 1.36 to 3.35; I² = 0%; 2 studies, 624 participants; high-certainty evidence). Serious adverse events, lung function (FEV₁), health-related quality of life, and adverse effects did not differ between groups. Antibiotic versus placebo: cycle of 28 days on/off. Antibiotics did not reduce overall exacerbation frequency (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.02; I² = 0%; 8 studies, 1695 participants; high-certainty evidence) but there were fewer severe exacerbations (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.37 to 0.93; I² = 54%; 3 studies, 624 participants), though this should be interpreted with caution due to low event rates. The risk of antibiotic resistance was more than twofold higher based on a pooled analysis (OR 2.20, 95% CI 1.42 to 3.42; I² = 0%; 3 studies, 685 participants; high-certainty evidence) and consistent with unpooled data from four further studies. Serious adverse events, time to first exacerbation, duration of exacerbation, respiratory-related hospital admissions, lung function, health-related quality of life and adverse effects did not differ between study groups. Antibiotic versus usual care. We did not find any studies that compared intermittent antibiotic regimens with usual care. Cycle of 14 days on/off versus cycle of 28 days on/off. Exacerbation frequency did not differ between the two treatment regimens (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.24; I² = 71%; 2 studies, 625 participants; moderate-certainty evidence) However, inconsistencies in the results from the two trials in this comparison indicate that the apparent aggregated similarities may not be reliable. There was no evidence of a difference in antibiotic resistance between groups (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.68 to 1.48; I² = 60%; 2 studies, 624 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Serious adverse events, adverse effects, lung function and health-related quality of life did not differ between the two antibiotic regimens.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Overall, in adults who have frequent chest infections, long-term antibiotics given at 14-day on/off intervals slightly reduces the frequency of those infections and increases antibiotic resistance. Intermittent antibiotic regimens result in little to no difference in serious adverse events. The impact of intermittent antibiotic therapy on children with bronchiectasis is unknown due to an absence of evidence, and further research is needed to establish the potential risks and benefits.

The Deteriorating Patient: Therapies Including Lung Transplantation

In this review paper, we discuss the characteristics that define severe bronchiectasis and which may lead to deterioration of noncystic fibrosis bronchiectasis. These characteristics were used to establish the current severity scores: bronchiectasis severity index (BSI), FACED, and E-FACED (exacerbation frequency, forced expiratory volume in 1 second, age, colonization, extension and dyspnea score). They can be used to predict mortality, exacerbation rate, hospital admission, and quality of life. Furthermore, there are different treatable traits that contribute to severe bronchiectasis and clinical deterioration. When present, they can be a target of the treatment to stabilize bronchiectasis.One of the first steps in treatment management of bronchiectasis is evaluation of compliance to already prescribed therapy. Several factors can contribute to treatment adherence, but to date no real interventions have been published to ameliorate this phenomenon. In the second step, treatment in deteriorating patients with bronchiectasis should be guided by the predominant symptoms, for example, cough, sputum, difficulty expectoration, exacerbation rate, or physical impairment. In the third step, we evaluate treatable traits that could influence disease severity in the deteriorating patient. Finally, in patients who are difficult to treat despite maximum medical treatment, eligibility for surgery (when disease is localized), should be considered. In case of end-stage disease, the evaluation for lung transplantation should be performed. Noninvasive ventilation can serve as a bridge to lung transplantation in patients with respiratory failure.

Long-Term Antibiotics in Bronchiectasis

A significant proportion of bronchiectasis patients are chronically infected by potentially pathogenic microorganisms which may lead to frequent exacerbations and worse clinical outcomes. Current bronchiectasis guidelines recommend long-term inhaled antibiotics and/or oral macrolides as a part of patient management. In recent years, an increasing amount of evidence assessing the impact of these treatments on patient outcomes has been collected. Inhaled antibiotics have demonstrated significant improvements in sputum bacterial load, but their impact on patient quality of life, lung function, and exacerbation rate has not been consistent across trials. In this regard, recent post hoc analyses of inhaled antibiotics trials in bronchiectasis patients have shown that sputum bacterial load may be a key biomarker to predict treatment response in these patients. Oral macrolides, on the other hand, have proven to reduce exacerbation frequency and improve quality of life, but potential drug-related adverse effects and the increase in bacterial resistance are relevant. This review aims to summarize current important evidence for long-term antibiotic treatment in bronchiectasis patients.

Validation of the Bronchiectasis Impact Measure (BIM): a novel patient-reported outcome measure

INTRODUCTION

Existing quality-of-life and symptom tools used in bronchiectasis trials are either not disease specific or are complex and have not been consistently responsive. We developed a simple patient-reported visual analogue outcome measure, the Bronchiectasis Impact Measure (BIM), for use in clinical research, including clinical trials.

METHODS

Patients with bronchiectasis attending a tertiary referral clinic in the east of Scotland were invited to complete the BIM questionnaire and the quality-of-life bronchiectasis questionnaire at baseline with repeat questionnaires after 2 weeks and 6 months. We assessed internal consistency, test-retest reliability, construct validity and responsiveness by evaluating change during an acute exacerbation.

RESULTS

173 patients were included. The eight domains (cough, sputum, breathlessness, tiredness, activity, general health, control, exacerbations) showed excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's α 0.93). The intraclass correlation coefficient demonstrated excellent reliability over a 2-week period: cough (0.79, 95% CI 0.70-0.85), sputum (0.86, 95% CI 0.80-0.90), dyspnoea (0.82, 95% CI 0.74-0.87), tiredness (0.88, 95% CI 0.82-0.91), activity (0.84, 95% CI 0.77-0.89), general health (0.81, 95% CI 0.74-0.87), control (0.83, 95% CI 0.75-0.88) and exacerbation (0.71, 95% CI 0.60-0.79). Domains correlated strongly with bronchiectasis severity and exacerbation history. Both distribution and patient-based methods estimated the minimal clinically important difference for each domain as 1.5 points on a 10-point scale. Statistically significant changes in all BIM domains were observed during an acute exacerbation.

CONCLUSION

The BIM is a simple patient-reported outcome. This study validates the internal consistency, reliability, construct validity and response of the tool at acute exacerbation. Further validation of the tool is now required.

Psychometrics of HRQoL questionnaires in bronchiectasis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Introduction

Understanding the psychometric properties of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) questionnaires can help inform selection in clinical trials. Our objective was to assess the psychometric properties of HRQoL questionnaires in bronchiectasis using a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature.

Methods

A literature search was conducted. HRQoL questionnaires were assessed for psychometric properties (reliability, validity, minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and floor/ceiling effects). Meta-analyses assessed the associations of HRQoL with clinical measures and responsiveness of HRQoL in clinical trials.

Results

166 studies and 12 HRQoL questionnaires were included. The Bronchiectasis Health Questionnaire (BHQ), Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Assessment Test (CAT) and Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) had good internal consistency in all domains reported (Cronbach's α≥0.7) across all studies, and the Quality of Life-Bronchiectasis (QOL-B), St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), Chronic Respiratory Disease Questionnaire (CRDQ) and Seattle Obstructive Lung Disease Questionnaire (SOLQ) had good internal consistency in all domains in the majority of (but not all) studies. BHQ, SGRQ, LCQ and CAT had good test–retest reliability in all domains reported (intraclass correlation coefficient ≥0.7) across all studies, and QOL-B, CRDQ and SOLQ had good test–retest reliability in all domains in the majority of (but not all) studies. HRQoL questionnaires were able to discriminate between demographics, important markers of clinical status, disease severity, exacerbations and bacteriology. For HRQoL responsiveness, there was a difference between the treatment and placebo effect.

Conclusions

SGRQ was the most widely used HRQoL questionnaire in bronchiectasis studies and it had good psychometric properties; however, good psychometric data are emerging on the bronchiectasis-specific HRQoL questionnaires QOL-B and BHQ. Future studies should focus on the medium- to long-term test–retest reliability, responsiveness and MCID in these HRQoL questionnaires which show potential in bronchiectasis.

The psychometric properties of health-related quality of life questionnaires should inform the selection of patient-reported outcomes in bronchiectasis clinical trialshttps://bit.ly/3wQuSrm

Pseudomonas aeruginosa in bronchiectasis: infection, inflammation, and therapies

Introduction: Bronchiectasis is a chronic endobronchial suppurative disease characterized by irreversibly dilated bronchi damaged by repeated polymicrobial infections and predominantly, neutrophilic airway inflammation. Some consider bronchiectasis a syndromic consequence of several different causes whilst others view it as an individual disease entity. In most patients, identifying an underlying cause remains challenging. The acquisition and colonization of affected airways by Pseudomonas aeruginosa represent a critical and adverse clinical consequence for its progression and management.Areas covered: In this review, we outline clinical and pre-clinical peer-reviewed research published in the last 5 years, focusing on the pathogenesis of bronchiectasis and the role of P. aeruginosa and its virulence in shaping host inflammatory and immune responses in the airway. We further detail its role in airway infection, the lung microbiome, and address therapeutic options in bronchiectasis.Expert opinion: P. aeruginosa represents a key pulmonary pathogen in bronchiectasis that causes acute and/or chronic airway infection. Eradication can prevent adverse clinical consequence and/or disease progression. Novel therapeutic strategies are emerging and include combination-based approaches. Addressing airway infection caused by P. aeruginosa in bronchiectasis is necessary to prevent airway damage, loss of lung function and exacerbations, all of which contribute to adverse clinical outcome.

A high-risk airway mycobiome is associated with frequent exacerbation and mortality in COPD

INTRODUCTION

The chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) bacteriome associates with disease severity, exacerbations and mortality. While COPD patients are susceptible to fungal sensitisation, the role of the fungal mycobiome remains uncertain.

METHODS

We report the largest multicentre evaluation of the COPD airway mycobiome to date, including participants from Asia (Singapore and Malaysia) and the UK (Scotland) when stable (n=337) and during exacerbations (n=66) as well as nondiseased (healthy) controls (n=47). Longitudinal mycobiome analysis was performed during and following COPD exacerbations (n=34), and examined in terms of exacerbation frequency, 2-year mortality and occurrence of serum specific IgE (sIgE) against selected fungi.

RESULTS

A distinct mycobiome profile is observed in COPD compared with controls as evidenced by increased α-diversity (Shannon index; p<0.001). Significant airway mycobiome differences, including greater interfungal interaction (by co-occurrence), characterise very frequent COPD exacerbators (three or more exacerbations per year) (permutational multivariate ANOVA; adjusted p<0.001). Longitudinal analyses during exacerbations and following treatment with antibiotics and corticosteroids did not reveal any significant change in airway mycobiome profile. Unsupervised clustering resulted in two clinically distinct COPD groups: one with increased symptoms (COPD Assessment Test score) and Saccharomyces dominance, and another with very frequent exacerbations and higher mortality characterised by Aspergillus, Curvularia and Penicillium with a concomitant increase in serum sIgE levels against the same fungi. During acute exacerbations of COPD, lower fungal diversity associates with higher 2-year mortality.

CONCLUSION

The airway mycobiome in COPD is characterised by specific fungal genera associated with exacerbations and increased mortality.

Neutrophil dysfunction in bronchiectasis: an emerging role for immunometabolism

Bronchiectasis is a heterogenous disease with multiple underlying causes. The pathophysiology is poorly understood but neutrophilic inflammation and dysfunctional killing of pathogens is believed to be key. There are, however, no licensed therapies for bronchiectasis that directly target neutrophilic inflammation. In this review, we discuss our current understanding of neutrophil dysfunction and therapeutic targeting in bronchiectasis. Immunometabolic reprogramming, a process through which inflammation changes inflammatory cell behaviour by altering intracellular metabolic pathways, is increasingly recognised across multiple inflammatory and autoimmune diseases. Here, we show evidence that much of the neutrophil dysfunction observed in bronchiectasis is consistent with immunometabolic reprogramming. Previous attempts at developing therapies targeting neutrophils have focused on reducing neutrophil numbers, resulting in increased frequency of infections. New approaches are needed and we propose that targeting metabolism could theoretically reverse neutrophil dysfunction and dysregulated inflammation. As an exemplar, 5' adenosine monophosphate (AMP)-activated protein kinase (AMPK) activation has already been shown to reverse phagocytic dysfunction and neutrophil extracellular trap (NET) formation in models of pulmonary disease. AMPK modulates multiple metabolic pathways, including glycolysis which is critical for energy generation in neutrophils. AMPK activators can reverse metabolic reprogramming and are already in clinical use and/or development. We propose the need for a new immunomodulatory approach, rather than an anti-inflammatory approach, to enhance bacterial clearance and reduce bronchiectasis disease severity.