Living without eosinophils: evidence from mouse and man

A Scoping Review of Eosinophilic Pneumonia and Antidepressants: An Association Not to Be Overlooked

Background: Eosinophilic pneumonias denote a rare condition, wherein infiltrating eosinophilic granulocytes accumulate within the lung parenchyma. Although eosinophilic pneumonias may be idiopathic, they are also associated with secondary causes. More than 110 medications have been linked to eosinophilic pneumonia, including several antidepressants. This review presents an analysis of case reports of eosinophilic pneumonia correlated to antidepressants. Objectives: The objectives of this study are to provide a contemporary overview of the literature delineating eosinophilic pneumonia as a potential sequela of antidepressant medication treatment, and to discuss possible pathogenetic mechanisms linking antidepressants to eosinophilic pneumonia. Methods and Data Selection: A literature search was performed in PubMed and Scopus databases from 1963 to October 2024. The search strategy used the terms "eosinophilic pneumonia AND antidepressants". Sources included in this review were screened for relevance, focusing on references discussing eosinophilic pneumonia associated with any class of antidepressants. Case reports meeting the diagnostic criteria for acute eosinophilic pneumonia (AEP) or chronic eosinophilic pneumonia (CEP) were included in the review. Clinical, epidemiological, laboratory, radiology and bronchoscopy data, implicated antidepressant and dosage, and therapeutic interventions were reported. Results: This study found that various types of antidepressants are associated with AEP and CEP. The clinical presentation ranges from mild symptoms to respiratory failure and intubation. Outcomes were favorable in most cases, with complete remission achieved after discontinuation of the causative drug and, in severe cases, a short course of corticosteroids. Conclusions: Although a rare cause, antidepressants may lead to eosinophilic pneumonia, and should be considered in the differential diagnosis of unexplained pulmonary infiltrates. Clinical suspicion must be aroused, as early recognition would prevent unnecessary work-up and navigation of the diagnosis.

Spatial adaptation of eosinophils and their emerging roles in homeostasis, infection and disease

Eosinophils are bone marrow-derived granulocytes that are traditionally associated with type 2 immune responses, such as those that occur during parasite infections and allergy. Emerging evidence demonstrates the remarkable functional plasticity of this elusive cell type and its pleiotropic functions in diverse settings. Eosinophils broadly contribute to tissue homeostasis, host defence and immune regulation, predominantly at mucosal sites. The scope of their activities primarily reflects the breadth of their portfolio of secreted mediators, which range from cytotoxic cationic proteins and reactive oxygen species to multiple cytokines, chemokines and lipid mediators. Here, we comprehensively review basic eosinophil biology that is directly related to their activities in homeostasis, protective immunity, regeneration and cancer. We examine how dysregulation of these functions contributes to the physiopathology of a broad range of inflammatory diseases. Furthermore, we discuss recent findings regarding the tissue compartmentalization and adaptation of eosinophils, shedding light on the factors that likely drive their functional diversification within tissues.

Mepolizumab depletes inflammatory but preserves homeostatic eosinophils in severe asthma

BACKGROUND

Eosinophils are key therapeutic targets in severe asthma that are suppressed by IL5 (mepolizumab) and IL5 receptor (benralizumab) blockade. The effect of IL5 pathway biologics on recently described homeostatic (hEOs) and inflammatory (iEOs) eosinophil subsets is unknown. We aimed to determine the relative impact of mepolizumab and benralizumab treatment on eosinophil subset and phenotype, and explore clinical associations of eosinophil subsets with severe asthma characteristics and treatment response.

METHODS

We performed a cross-sectional observational study of severe asthma (eosinophilic n = 32, non-eosinophilic n = 23, mepolizumab-treated n = 25), with longitudinal follow-up of 30 eosinophilic participants at two timepoints (4-24 weeks, >24 weeks) post-commencement of mepolizumab (n = 20) or benralizumab (n = 10). Blood hEOs and iEOs were measured by flow cytometry assessment of surface CD62L protein.

RESULTS

iEO proportion was significantly lower in mepolizumab-treated participants in both the cross-sectional and longitudinal study. Mepolizumab and benralizumab depleted iEOs to a similar extent, however a significantly greater number of hEOs remained in mepolizumab participants at follow-up. Greater iEO proportion correlated with poorer asthma control in eosinophilic but not non-eosinophilic asthma. Higher residual iEO proportion correlated with poorer asthma control in mepolizumab-treated individuals. Reduced blood eosinophil viability was observed in around half of mepolizumab-treated participants, which was associated with significantly better asthma control and spirometry.

CONCLUSIONS

Mepolizumab depletes iEOs and reduces circulating eosinophil viability in severe asthma but preserves a residual population of circulatory hEOs. In contrast benralizumab depleted both iEOs and hEOs. Higher iEO abundance and eosinophil viability are associated with poorer clinical outcomes following mepolizumab-treatment. Monitoring circulating eosinophil phenotype and viability may be useful to predict biologic treatment response in severe asthma.

Targeting the IL-5 pathway in eosinophilic asthma: A comparison of anti-IL-5 versus anti-IL-5 receptor agents

Eosinophilic asthma is characterized by frequent exacerbations, poor symptom control and accelerated lung function decline. It is now recognized that the immune response underlying eosinophilic asthma involves a complex network of interconnected pathways from both the adaptive and innate immune systems. Within this response, interleukin-5 (IL-5) plays a central role in eosinophil differentiation, activation and survival and has emerged as a key target for therapies treating severe asthma. The monoclonal antibodies mepolizumab and reslizumab target the ligand IL-5, preventing its interaction with eosinophils; in contrast, benralizumab binds to the IL-5 receptor (IL-5R), preventing IL-5 from binding and leading to substantially greater eosinophil reduction by enhanced antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity. Although no direct head-to-head clinical trials of asthma have been published to formally evaluate the clinical significance of these different therapeutic approaches, the potential benefits of partial versus complete eosinophil depletion continue to remain an important area of study and debate. Here, we review the existing real-world and clinical study data of anti-IL-5/anti-IL-5R therapies in severe eosinophilic asthma.

Therapeutic relevance of eosinophilic inflammation and airway viral interactions in severe asthma

The role of eosinophils in airway inflammation and asthma pathogenesis is well established, with raised eosinophil counts in blood and sputum associated with increased disease severity and risk of asthma exacerbation. Conversely, there is also preliminary evidence suggesting antiviral properties of eosinophils in the airways. These dual roles for eosinophils are particularly pertinent as respiratory virus infections contribute to asthma exacerbations. Biologic therapies targeting key molecules implicated in eosinophil-associated pathologies have been approved in patients with severe asthma and, therefore, the effects of depleting eosinophils in a clinical setting are of considerable interest. This review discusses the pathological and antiviral roles of eosinophils in asthma and exacerbations. We also highlight the significant reduction in asthma exacerbations seen with biologic therapies, even at the height of the respiratory virus season. Furthermore, we discuss the implications of these findings in relation to the role of eosinophils in inflammation and antiviral responses to respiratory virus infection in asthma.

What every clinician should know about inflammation in COPD

Inflammation drives COPD pathogenesis and exacerbations. Although the conceptual framework and major players in the inflammatory milieu of COPD have been long established, the nuances of cellular interactions and the etiological differences that create heterogeneity in inflammatory profiles and treatment response continue to be revealed. This wealth of data and understanding is not only a boon to the researcher but also provides guidance to the clinician, moving the field closer to precision medicine. It is through this lens that this review seeks to describe the inflammatory processes at play in COPD, relating inflammation to pathological and functional changes, identifying patient-specific and disease-related factors that may influence clinical observations, and providing current insights on existing and emerging anti-inflammatory treatments and treatment targets, including biological therapies and phosphodiesterase (PDE) inhibitors.

MELTEMI and COLUMBA: 5-Year Comparative Safety Analysis of Benralizumab and Mepolizumab

BACKGROUND

Benralizumab and mepolizumab are interleukin (IL)-5Rα/interleukin-5-targeted monoclonal antibodies indicated as add-on treatments for patients with uncontrolled severe eosinophilic asthma (SEA).

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate and compare the safety of benralizumab and mepolizumab among patients with SEA treated in MELTEMI and COLUMBA open-label, long-term extension studies, respectively.

METHODS

MELTEMI was an extension study of benralizumab every 4 weeks (q4w) or every 8 weeks (q8w) for adults (aged 18-75 y) with SEA. MELTEMI participants transitioned from the BORA extension, preceded by participation in 1 of 3 placebo-controlled studies (SIROCCO, CALIMA, or ZONDA). COLUMBA was an extension study of mepolizumab for patients (aged ≥ 12 y) with SEA who transitioned from the dose-ranging DREAM study. Safety endpoints were presented as drug exposure patient-years (MELTEMI, q4w 784.28, q8w 797.03; COLUMBA 1,201) for nonserious adverse events, serious adverse events, and infections; malignancies were counted numerically.

RESULTS

This analysis included 446 MELTEMI patients (benralizumab q4w 220; benralizumab q8w 226) and 347 COLUMBA patients (mepolizumab q4w). Viral upper respiratory tract infection was the most common nonserious adverse event in both studies (MELTEMI q8w 46.5%; q4w 47.3%; COLUMBA, 48.7%). Asthma-related events were the most common serious adverse events in both studies: MELTEMI 8.0% (q8w) and 8.6% (q4w) and COLUMBA 9.5%. Serious infections included pneumonia (MELTEMI q8w, 2 [0.9%]; COLUMBA, 6 [1.7%]); cellulitis (MELTEMI q8w, 1 [0.4%]; COLUMBA, 2 [0.6%]); and respiratory tract infections (COLUMBA, 2 [0.6%]). COLUMBA reported 6 malignancies and MELTEMI reported 4 malignancies in each group.

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis demonstrated generally similar safety events between mepolizumab and benralizumab in patients with SEA.

Ally, adversary, or arbitrator? The context-dependent role of eosinophils in vaccination for respiratory viruses and subsequent breakthrough infections

Eosinophils are a critical type of immune cell and central players in type 2 immunity. Existing literature suggests that eosinophils also can play a role in host antiviral responses, typically type 1 immune events, against multiple respiratory viruses, both directly through release of antiviral mediators and indirectly through activation of other effector cell types. One way to prime host immune responses toward effective antiviral responses is through vaccination, where typically a type 1-skewed immunity is desirable in the context of intracellular pathogens like respiratory viruses. In the realm of breakthrough respiratory viral infection in vaccinated hosts, an event in which virus can still establish productive infection despite preexisting immunity, eosinophils are most prominently known for their link to vaccine-associated enhanced respiratory disease upon natural respiratory syncytial virus infection. This was observed in a pediatric cohort during the 1960s following vaccination with formalin-inactivated respiratory syncytial virus. More recent research has unveiled additional roles of the eosinophil in respiratory viral infection and breakthrough infection. The specific contribution of eosinophils to the quality of vaccine responses, vaccine efficacy, and antiviral responses to infection in vaccinated hosts remains largely unexplored, especially regarding their potential roles in protection. On the basis of current findings, we will speculate upon the suggested function of eosinophils and consider the many potential ways by which eosinophils may exert protective and pathological effects in breakthrough infections. We will also discuss how to balance vaccine efficacy with eosinophil-related risks, as well as the use of eosinophils and their products as potential biomarkers of vaccine efficacy or adverse events.

Considerations on the evolutionary biology and functions of eosinophils: what the "haeckel"?

The origins and evolution of the eosinophilic leukocyte have received only scattered attention since Paul Ehrlich first named this granulocyte. Studies suggest that myeloperoxidase, expressed by granulocytes, and eosinophil peroxidase diverged some 60 to 70 million years ago, but invertebrate to vertebrate evolution of the eosinophil lineage is unknown. Vertebrate eosinophils have been characterized extensively in representative species at light microscopic, ultrastructural, genetic, and biochemical levels. Understanding of eosinophil function continues to expand and includes to date regulation of "Local Immunity And/Or Remodeling/Repair" (the so-called LIAR hypothesis), modulation of innate and adaptive immune responses, maintenance of tissue and metabolic homeostasis, and, under pathologic conditions, inducers of tissue damage, repair, remodeling, and fibrosis. This contrasts with their classically considered primary roles in host defense against parasites and other pathogens, as well as involvement in T-helper 2 inflammatory and immune responses. The eosinophils' early appearance during evolution and continued retention within the innate immune system across taxa illustrate their importance during evolutionary biology. However, successful pregnancies in eosinophil-depleted humans/primates treated with biologics, host immune responses to parasites in eosinophil-deficient mice, and the absence of significant developmental or functional abnormalities in eosinophil-deficient mouse strains under laboratory conditions raise questions of the continuing selective advantages of the eosinophil lineage in mammals and humans. The objectives of this review are to provide an overview on evolutionary origins of eosinophils across the animal kingdom, discuss some of their main functions in the context of potential evolutionary relevance, and highlight the need for further research on eosinophil functions and functional evolution.

Real-World Safety Profile of Biologic Drugs for Severe Uncontrolled Asthma: A Descriptive Analysis from the Spanish Pharmacovigilance Database

Background: The present investigation provides a thorough analysis of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) reported in the Database of the Spanish Pharmacovigilance System (FEDRA) for biologic medications primarily indicated for severe refractory asthma, including omalizumab, mepolizumab, reslizumab, benralizumab, dupilumab, and tezepelumab. Our main objective was to identify ADRs not documented in the drugs' Technical Sheets (summary of product characteristics, SmPC), potentially indicating unrecognized risks meriting pharmacovigilance attention. Methods: Data spanning from each drug's market introduction until 22 January 2024, were analyzed, sourced from direct submissions to the Spanish Pharmacovigilance System, industry communications, and literature reviews. We evaluated notifications impartially to ensure a comprehensive review of all the ADRs associated with these medications. Results: This investigation underlines the critical role of post-marketing surveillance in enhancing patient safety. It emphasizes the necessity for healthcare professionals to report ADRs comprehensively to foster a robust pharmacovigilance system. Furthermore, the study highlights gaps between the reported ADRs and the information provided in SmPCs, signaling potential areas for improvement in drug safety monitoring and regulatory oversight. Conclusions: Finally, these findings may contribute to informed decision making in clinical practice and regulatory policy, ultimately advancing patient care and safety in the management of severe uncontrolled asthma.

Eosinophils Play a Surprising Leading Role in Recurrent Urticaria in Horses

Urticaria, independent of or associated with allergies, is commonly seen in horses and often shows a high reoccurrence rate. Managing these horses is discouraging, and efficient treatment options are lacking. Due to an incidental finding in a study on horses affected by insect bite hypersensitivity using the eosinophil-targeting eIL-5-CuMV-TT vaccine, we observed the prevention of reoccurring seasonal urticaria in four subsequent years with re-vaccination. In an exploratory case series of horses affected with non-seasonal urticaria, we aimed to investigate the role of eosinophils in urticaria. Skin punch biopsies for histology and qPCR of eosinophil associated genes were performed. Further, two severe, non-seasonal, recurrent urticaria-affected horses were vaccinated using eIL-5-CuMV-TT, and urticaria flare-up was followed up with re-vaccination for several years. Eotaxin-2, eotaxin-3, IL-5, CCR5, and CXCL10 showed high sensitivity and specificity for urticarial lesions, while eosinophils were present in 50% of histological tissue sections. The eIL-5-CuMV-TT vaccine reduced eosinophil counts in blood, cleared clinical signs of urticaria, and even prevented new episodes of urticaria in horses with non-seasonal recurrent urticaria. This indicates that eosinophils play a leading role in urticaria in horses, and targeting eosinophils offers an attractive new treatment option, replacing the use of corticosteroids.

Clonorchis sinensis infection amplifies hepatocellular carcinoma stemness, predicting unfavorable prognosis

BACKGROUND

Extensive evidence links Clonorchis sinensis (C. sinensis) to cholangiocarcinoma; however, its association with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is less acknowledged, and the underlying mechanism remains unclear. This study was designed to investigate the association between C. sinensis infection and HCC and reveal the relationship between C. sinensis infection and cancer stemness.

METHODS

A comprehensive analysis of 839 HCC patients categorized into C. sinensis (-) HCC and C. sinensis (+) HCC groups was conducted. Chi-square and Mann-Whitney U tests were used to assess the association between C. sinensis infection and clinical factors. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were used to evaluate survival outcomes. Immunohistochemistry was used to determine CK19 and EpCAM expression in HCC specimens.

RESULTS

Compared to C. sinensis (-) HCC patients, C. sinensis (+) HCC patients exhibited advanced Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage, higher male prevalence and more liver cirrhosis as well as elevated alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), eosinophil, complement 3 (C3), and complement 4 (C4) values. C. sinensis infection correlated with shorter overall survival (OS) (p < 0.05) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) (p < 0.05). Furthermore, Cox multivariate analysis revealed that C. sinensis infection was an independent prognostic factor for OS in HCC patients. Importantly, C. sinensis infection upregulated the expression of HCC cancer stem cell markers CK19 and EpCAM.

CONCLUSION

HCC patients with C. sinensis infection exhibit a poor prognosis following hepatectomy. Moreover, C. sinensis infection promotes the acquisition of cancer stem cell-like characteristics, consequently accelerating the malignant progression of HCC.

AUTHOR SUMMARY

Clonorchis sinensis (C. sinensis) is a prominent food-borne parasite prevalent in regions such as China, particularly in Guangxi. C. sinensis has been associated with various hepatobiliary system injuries, encompassing inflammation, periductal fibrosis, cholangiocarcinoma and even hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). A substantial body of evidence links C. sinensis to cholangiocarcinoma, However, the connection between C. sinensis and HCC and the intricate mechanisms underlying its contribution to HCC development remain incompletely elucidated. Our study demonstrates clear clinicopathological associations between C. sinensis and HCC, such as gender, BCLC stage, liver cirrhosis, MVI, AFP, CA19-9, circulating eosinophils and complements. Furthermore, we found that the co-occurrence of C. sinensis exhibited a significant association with shorter OS and RFS in patients diagnosed with HCC. A major finding was that C. sinensis infection promotes the acquisition of cancer stem cell-like characteristics, consequently accelerating the malignant progression of HCC. Our results provide a more comprehensive comprehension of the interplay between C. sinensis and HCC, shedding fresh light on the carcinogenic potential of C. sinensis.

Cell type-specific molecular mechanisms and implications of necroptosis in inflammatory respiratory diseases

Necroptosis is generally considered as an inflammatory cell death form. The core regulators of necroptotic signaling are receptor-interacting serine-threonine protein kinases 1 (RIPK1) and RIPK3, and the executioner, mixed lineage kinase domain-like pseudokinase (MLKL). Evidence demonstrates that necroptosis contributes profoundly to inflammatory respiratory diseases that are common public health problem. Necroptosis occurs in nearly all pulmonary cell types in the settings of inflammatory respiratory diseases. The influence of necroptosis on cells varies depending upon the type of cells, tissues, organs, etc., which is an important factor to consider. Thus, in this review, we briefly summarize the current state of knowledge regarding the biology of necroptosis, and focus on the key molecular mechanisms that define the necroptosis status of specific cell types in inflammatory respiratory diseases. We also discuss the clinical potential of small molecular inhibitors of necroptosis in treating inflammatory respiratory diseases, and describe the pathological processes that engage cross talk between necroptosis and other cell death pathways in the context of respiratory inflammation. The rapid advancement of single-cell technologies will help understand the key mechanisms underlying cell type-specific necroptosis that are critical to effectively treat pathogenic lung infections and inflammatory respiratory diseases.

Vectorized Human Antibody-Mediated Anti-Eosinophil Gene Therapy

Chronic hypereosinophilia, defined as persistent elevated blood levels of eosinophils ≥1,500/μL, is associated with tissue infiltration of eosinophils and consequent organ damage by eosinophil release of toxic mediators. The current therapies for chronic hypereosinophilia have limited success, require repetitive administration, and are associated with a variety of adverse effects. As a novel approach to treat chronic hypereosinophilia, we hypothesized that adeno-associated virus (AAV)-mediated delivery of an anti-human eosinophil antibody would provide one-time therapy that would mediate persistent suppression of blood eosinophil levels. To assess this hypothesis, we first generated a human monoclonal antibody (mAb) directed against Siglec8, a sialic-acid binding immunoglobulin-like lectin, expressed at high levels on the cell surface of human eosinophils. Transgenic mice with a human immunoglobulin repertoire were immunized with human Siglec8 protein or DNA encoding human Siglec8. Based on target binding assessments, the 08C07 mAb was chosen for further study. The human variable regions of 08C07 were joined to the human Ig constant region, creating H08C07 (hAntiEos), a fully human anti-human eosinophil mAb. Using the gene sequence of hAntiEos, we created AAVrh.10hAntiEos, an AAVrh.10-based vector expressing the heavy and light chains of H08C07. Intravenous administration of AAVrh.10hAntiEos (1011 genome copies or gc) to C57Bl/6 mice resulted in persistent elevated serum levels of hAntiEos. In vivo gene therapy generated hAntiEos bound to recombinant human Siglec8 protein in a dose-dependent manner and to human eosinophils, mediated apoptosis of human eosinophils, and antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity activity against human eosinophils. Consistent with these data, administration of AAVrh.10hAntiEos to human CD34+ transplanted NSG-SGM3 immunodeficient mice suppressed levels of human eosinophils in vivo. AAVrh.10hAntiEos holds the potential to offer therapeutic benefit to patients with chronic hypereosinophilia.

Eosinophils-from cradle to grave: An EAACI task force paper on new molecular insights and clinical functions of eosinophils and the clinical effects of targeted eosinophil depletion

Over the past years, eosinophils have become a focus of scientific interest, especially in the context of their recently uncovered functions (e.g. antiviral, anti-inflammatory, regulatory). These versatile cells display both beneficial and detrimental activities under various physiological and pathological conditions. Eosinophils are involved in the pathogenesis of many diseases which can be classified into primary (clonal) and secondary (reactive) disorders and idiopathic (hyper)eosinophilic syndromes. Depending on the biological specimen, the eosinophil count in different body compartments may serve as a biomarker reflecting the underlying pathophysiology and/or activity of distinct diseases and as a therapy-driving (predictive) and monitoring tool. Personalized selection of an appropriate therapeutic strategy directly or indirectly targeting the increased number and/or activity of eosinophils should be based on the understanding of eosinophil homeostasis including their interactions with other immune and non-immune cells within different body compartments. Hence, restoring as well as maintaining homeostasis within an individual's eosinophil pool is a goal of both specific and non-specific eosinophil-targeting therapies. Despite the overall favourable safety profile of the currently available anti-eosinophil biologics, the effect of eosinophil depletion should be monitored from the perspective of possible unwanted consequences.

Domestic Parasitic Infections in Patients with Asthma and Eosinophilia in Germany - Three Cases with Learnings in the Era of Anti- IL5 Treatments

Eosinophilic inflammation is a hallmark of asthma, and blood eosinophilia has been established as a biomarker for phenotyping asthma and predicting the response to anti-IL5 treatments. Although parasitic infections are rare in European adults, they remain an important differential diagnosis for blood eosinophilia. We present three patients with both domestic parasitic infections and asthma to raise awareness of the potential challenge of eosinophilia and to provide experience in the management of parasitic infections in the setting of planned or ongoing anti-IL5 treatment. One, a patient from Croatia with moderate asthma but severe blood eosinophilia had an underlying Strongyloides stercoralis infection, with positive stool cultures. Second, a patient with severe allergic asthma and gastrointestinal symptoms had a positive S. stercoralis titer in serology with a clinical response to treatment with ivermectin. Third, a patient with severe nonallergic eosinophilic asthma and eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) showed an increasing hepatic tumour under anti-IL5-receptor therapy. Positive serology confirmed the diagnosis of Echinococcus multilocularis, and albendazole therapy was initiated. Anti-IL5 therapies were safely started (Patient 2) or resumed (Patient 3) after the initiation of antiparasitic treatment. Screening for parasitic infections is useful in cases of hypereosinophilia, extrapulmonary symptoms or stay in endemic regions.