Small cell lung cancer in never-smokers

An overview on the relationship between residential radon and lung cancer: what we know and future research

We aim to provide an overview of the research available on indoor radon and lung cancer, with a special focus on Spanish investigations. Early studies on underground miners established the link between radon and lung cancer, which was later confirmed for the general population by residential case-control studies. Spain contributed with extensive evidence, including 5 multicentric, hospital-based, case-control studies in the last 30 years, exploring diverse aspects, such as radon's effect on never-smokers, molecular pathways linking radon exposure to lung cancer risk, survival rates, mortality burden, and occupational exposure. There is a well-established causal association between radon with lung cancer. Despite pioneering research performed in our country by the Galician Radon Laboratory, particularly on driver genes, the evidence on the potential molecular pathways which makes radon a carcinogen is sparse. Also, relevant questions on the potential association of radon exposure with the induction of other diseases are still pending.

Social determinants of health and lung cancer surgery: a qualitative study

Introduction

Social determinants of health (SDOH) are non-clinical factors that may affect the outcomes of cancer patients. The purpose of this study was to describe the influence of SDOH factors on quality of life (QOL)-related outcomes for lung cancer surgery patients.

Methods

Thirteen patients enrolled in a randomized trial of a dyadic self-management intervention were invited and agreed to participate in semi-structured key informant interviews at study completion (3 months post-discharge). A conventional content analysis approach was used to identify codes and themes that were derived from the interviews. Independent investigators coded the qualitative data, which were subsequently confirmed by a second group of independent investigators. Themes were finalized, and discrepancies were reviewed and resolved.

Results

Six themes, each with several subthemes, emerged. Overall, most participants were knowledgeable about the concept of SDOH and perceived that provider awareness of SDOH information was important for the delivery of comprehensive care in surgery. Some participants described financial challenges during treatment that were exacerbated by their cancer diagnosis and resulted in stress and poor QOL. The perceived impact of education varied and included its importance in navigating the healthcare system, decision-making on health behaviors, and more economic mobility opportunities. Some participants experienced barriers to accessing healthcare due to insurance coverage, travel burden, and the fear of losing quality insurance coverage due to retirement. Neighborhood and built environment factors such as safety, air quality, access to green space, and other environmental factors were perceived as important to QOL. Social support through families/friends and spiritual/religious communities was perceived as important to postoperative recovery.

Discussion

Among lung cancer surgery patients, SDOH factors can impact QOL and the patient's survivorship journey. Importantly, SDOH should be assessed routinely to identify patients with unmet needs across the five domains. SDOH-driven interventions are needed to address these unmet needs and to improve the QOL and quality of care for lung cancer surgery patients.

Asbestos exposure and small cell lung cancer: Systematic review and meta-analysis

Asbestos is a mineral that is carcinogenic to humans. Its use has been banned in many occidental countries yet it is still produced in the United States, and materials that contain asbestos remain in many occupational settings and indoor environments. Even though asbestos carcinogenicity is well known, there is scant literature on its specific effects regarding small cell lung cancer (SCLC). We therefore conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine SCLC risk among workers exposed to asbestos. A systematic search of the literature was conducted to identify studies which reported occupational exposure to asbestos and SCLC-related deaths and/or incidence. We identified seven case-control studies that included 3,231 SCLC cases; four studies reported smoking-adjusted risks. A significantly increased risk of SCLC (pooled OR 1.89; 95% CI, 1.25-2.86) was observed on pooling studies on men (six studies) that displayed moderate heterogeneity (I2 = 46.0%). Overall, our synthesis suggests that occupational exposure to asbestos significantly increases the risk of SCLC on men.

Small Cell Lung Cancer in Light/Never Smokers - A Role for Molecular Testing?

This report describes the management of small cell lung cancer (SCLC) transformation in a patient with untreated ALK-mutated advanced disease and a minimal smoking history, and a separate case of a de novo SCLC in a lifelong nonsmoker found to have a potentially targetable ERBB2 alteration. In the first case, chemotherapy followed by a targeted inhibitor was chosen due to the presence of the ALK rearrangement, as well as a somewhat discordant response to induction chemotherapy, suggesting possible progression of the ALK inhibitor-sensitive component. Molecular testing for the identification of driver mutations should be considered in patients with SCLC who have light/never smoking histories in order to help understand the incidence and ultimate optimal management strategies.

Characteristics and clinical outcomes of patients with nonsmoking small cell lung cancer in Korea

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to investigate the characteristics and clinical outcomes of patients with nonsmoking small cell lung cancer (SCLC) using a nationwide registry in Korea.

METHODS

The Korean Association for Lung Cancer developed a registry in cooperation with the Korean Central Cancer Registry (KCCR) and surveyed approximately 10% of recorded lung cancer cases.

RESULTS

From 2014 to 2016, the KCCR registered 1,043 patients newly diagnosed with SCLC among a total of 8,110 lung cancer patients. In subgroup analysis, Kaplan meier survival analysis showed that the overall survival (OS) was significantly shorter in the nonsmoking subgroup than the ever-smoking subgroup of SCLC patients with extensive disease (6.99 vs. 9.68 months; P = 0.016). Among SCLC patients with limited disease, OS was also shorter in the nonsmoking subgroup, without statistical significance (19.4 vs. 23.5 months; P = 0.247). In a multivariate analysis using a Cox regression model, never smoking was not associated with shorter OS, but older age, extensive stage, poor performance status (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group grade ≥ 2), male sex, no prophylactic cranial irradiation, and no active treatment (chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy) were associated with poor prognosis.

CONCLUSION

This evaluation of an unbiased nationwide survey dataset revealed that a significant proportion of Korean SCLC patients were never-smokers. No history of smoking appeared to be a significant prognostic factor according to the univariate analysis but was confirmed to be statistically insignificant through a multivariate analysis of the total population. Reasons for a poor prognosis may include the possibility that a high rate of the elderly population is composed of nonsmokers who did not receive active treatment.

Lung cancer symptom appraisal, help-seeking and diagnosis - rapid systematic review of differences between patients with and without a smoking history

BACKGROUND

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death in the world. A significant minority of lung cancer patients have never smoked (14% in the UK, and ranging from 10% to 25% worldwide). Current evidence suggests that never-smokers encounter delays during the diagnostic pathway, yet it is unclear how their experiences and reasons for delayed diagnoses differ from those of current and former smokers. This rapid review assessed literature about patient experiences in relation to symptom awareness and appraisal, help-seeking, and the lung cancer diagnostic pathway, comparing patients with and without a smoking history.

METHODS

MEDLINE, PsychINFO and Google Scholar were searched for studies (2010-2020) that investigated experiences of the pathway to diagnosis for patients with and without a smoking history. Findings are presented using a narrative synthesis.

RESULTS

Analysis of seven quantitative and three qualitative studies revealed that some delays during symptom appraisal and diagnosis are unique to never-smokers. Due to the strong link between smoking and lung cancer, and low awareness of non-smoking related lung cancer risk factors and symptoms, never-smokers do not perceive themselves to be at risk. Never-smokers are also likely to evaluate their experiences in comparison with other non-smoking related cancers, where prognosis is likely better, potentially leading to lower satisfaction with healthcare.

CONCLUSION

Never-smokers appear to have different experiences in relation to symptom appraisal and diagnosis. However, evidence in relation to help-seeking, and what is driving diagnostic delays for never-smoker patients specifically is lacking.

Association of Smoking With Patient Characteristics and Outcomes in Small Cell Lung Carcinoma, 2011-2018

IMPORTANCE

Small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC) is uncommon in individuals who have never smoked (never-smokers). The related epidemiologic factors and prognosis remain unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the epidemiologic factors, clinical characteristics, and outcomes of SCLC in never-smokers.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from the national Taiwan Cancer Registry, which was inaugurated in 1979 and maintains standardized records of patients' characteristics and clinical information for all individuals with cancer. Patients with cytologically or pathologically proven lung cancer were included for analysis. The study obtained data on patients from January 1, 1996, to December 31, 2018; data analysis was conducted from January 1, 1996, to December 31, 2019.

EXPOSURES

Clinical characteristics and outcomes of smokers and never-smokers with SCLC.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Clinical characteristics for comparison included age at diagnosis, sex, performance status, tumor stage, and treatment. The main outcome parameter was overall survival of patients with SCLC from 2011 to 2018.

RESULTS

From 1996 to 2018, a total of 225 788 patients had diagnosed lung cancer; 141 654 patients (62.7%) were men; mean (SD) age was 67.55 (12.58) years. The numbers of both patients with newly diagnosed lung cancer and those with SCLC increased until 2009 by 111.5% for lung cancer and 118.5% for SCLC. Thereafter, lung cancer cases grew in number, but SCLC cases did not; hence, the percentage of patients with SCLC decreased from 9.3% in 2009 to 6.3% in 2018. From 2011 to 2018, the percentage of never-smokers increased significantly among all patients with lung cancers (from 49.9% in 2011 to 60.2% in 2018) and among those with lung adenocarcinomas (from 64.1% in 2011 to 70.9% in 2018) (both P < .001). However, the percentage of never-smokers appeared to vary little in the SCLC population: 15.5% in 2011 and 16.1% in 2018 (P = .28). The median overall survival was significantly longer in patients with adenocarcinoma vs SCLC (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.31-0.33; P < .001). Compared with smokers with SCLC, never-smokers with SCLC tended to include more older patients (age ≥70 years: 492 [57.3%] vs 2242 [44.8%]), more women (274 [31.9%] vs 322 [6.4%]), more individuals with a poor performance status (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≥2: 284 [33.1%] vs 1261 [25.2%]) and stage IV cancer (660 [76.9%] vs 3590 [71.8%]), and more patients without treatment (203 [23.7%] vs 626 [12.5%]). Furthermore, never-smokers, particularly men, experienced a shorter survival rate (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.00-1.20; P = .04) compared with the other groups.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

The findings of this cohort study suggest that the decrease in the percentage of patients with SCLC was associated with increased lung cancers of other histologic types, with no substantial decrease in the number of those with SCLC.

Survival and pretreatment prognostic factors for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: A comprehensive analysis of 358 patients

BACKGROUND

Extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) is deemed as a fatal malignancy with a poor prognosis. Although immunotherapy has gradually played an important role in the treatment of ES-SCLC since 2018, ES-SCLC treatment data and patient outcome before 2018, when chemotherapy served as a fundamental therapeutic strategy, is still meaningful as a summary of the situation regarding previous medical treatment and is a baseline for comparative data. In addition, the prognostic factors of ES-SCLC have failed to reach a consensus until now. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate survival and identify the prognostic factors in an ES-SCLC population.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected the detailed medical records of 358 patients with ES-SCLC from January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2018 in a Chinese top-level cancer hospital. The prognostic factors were evaluated by Cox univariate and multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

The median overall survival (OS) of ES-SCLC patients (N = 358) was 14.0 months, the one- and two-year OS rates were 56.2% and 21.7%, respectively. Moreover, we identified two demographic characters (age ≥ 70, smoking index ≥ 400), one tumor burden factor (bone multimetastasis), two tumor biomarkers (cyfra211, CA125) and two laboratory indexes (decreased Na, PLR < 76) as independent prognostic factors for OS in this patient population. Progression-free survival (PFS) data of 238 patients was obtained for further analysis, and the median PFS was 6.2 months, and six-month and one-year PFS rates were 51.7% and 14.3%, respectively. Elevated cyfra211, decreased Hb and Na were identified as independent prognostic factors for PFS.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides real-world evidence of the survival and prognosis of ES-SCLC patients which will enable better evaluation and clinical decision-making in the future.

Residential radon and lung cancer characteristics at diagnosis

PURPOSE

This study sought to ascertain whether there might be an association between radon concentrations and age, gender, histologic type, and tumor stage at diagnosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Lung cancer cases from different multicenter case-control studies were analyzed, and clinical data were retrieved from electronic health records and personal interviews. A radon device was placed in all dwellings of participants, and we then tested the existence of an association between residential radon and lung cancer characteristics at diagnosis.

RESULTS

Of the total of 829 lung cancer cases included, 56.7% were smokers or ex-smokers. There was no association between indoor radon concentrations and age, gender, histologic type or tumor stage at diagnosis. Median indoor radon concentrations increased with age at diagnosis for men, but not for women. When analyzing participants exposed to more than 1000 Bq/m³, a predominance of small cell lung cancer and a higher presence of advanced stages (IIIB and IV) were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

There seems to be no association between radon and age, gender, histologic type or tumor stage at diagnosis. Higher radon exposure is more frequent in the case of small-cell lung cancer.

Small-cell lung cancer in never-smokers

Background

Lung cancer is a public health problem worldwide. Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is the most aggressive histologic type, with a 5-year survival <10%. SCLC is closely associated with tobacco consumption and infrequent in never-smokers. We aim to describe SCLC characteristics in never-smokers recruited in a radon-prone area.

Patients and methods

We designed a multicentric case series where SCLC cases were recruited consecutively following histologic confirmation. Detailed information was obtained for indoor radon exposure, occupation and environmental tobacco smoke. We also collected different clinical characteristics such as extended or limited disease at diagnosis.

Results

We recruited 32 never-smoking SCLC cases. Median age was 75 years and 87.5% were women; 47% had extended disease. Median radon concentration was 182 Bq/m³. There were no statistically significant differences in residential radon concentration neither regarding age at diagnosis nor regarding sex. The most frequent symptoms were constitutional syndrome (23.1%) and coughing (23.1%). As much as 63% of cases had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Study (ECOG) status of 0-2. The 1- and 2-year survival rates were 34.4% and 21.9%, respectively. The 2-year survival rate with a localized tumor was 26.7%, compared with 18.8% for extended disease.

Conclusions

These results show, for the first time, that indoor radon might not be associated with SCLC characteristics at diagnosis in never-smokers, and also confirms the low survival of this aggressive type of lung cancer also for never-smokers.

•

Small-cell lung cancer in never-smokers is an infrequent disease.

•

Risk factors are poorly characterized, and we have observed that residential radon may have a role (182 Bq/m³ as average).

•

In this study, 1- and 2-year survival rates were 34.4% and 21.9%, respectively.

Prognostic value of pretreatment smoking status for small cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis

Background

Although tobacco exposure remains the most important risk factor of tumorigenesis of small cell lung cancer (SCLC), its prognostic value has failed to reach a consensus until now. Accordingly, we conducted a meta‐analysis to investigate the prognostic value of pretreatment smoking status (smokers vs. never‐smokers) in SCLC.

Methods

The four databases PubMed, Medline, Embase, and Cochrane library were searched to identify the relevant literature from the inception dates to 24 June 2020. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS), and the secondary endpoint was progression‐free survival (PFS). The hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were extracted to assess the relationship between pretreatment smoking status and patient survival. Sensitivity analysis was performed to assess the stability of the pooled results. Begg's funnel plot and Egger's test were applied to detect the publication bias. All statistical analyses were performed using RevMan V.5.3 and STATA version 15.0 software.

Results

A total of 27 studies involving 12 047 patients with SCLC (9137 smokers and 2910 never‐smokers) were included in this meta‐analysis. The results showed that smoking history was closely related to poorer survival outcome (OS: HR = 1.17, 95% CI: 1.12–1.23, P < 0.00001; I² = 0%; PFS: HR = 1.20, 95% CI: 1.06–1.35, P = 0.004; I² = 0%).

Conclusions

Smoking history should be considered as an independent poor prognostic factor for patients with SCLC. More large‐scale prospective studies are warranted to testify the prognostic value of pretreatment smoking status.

Clinical and Genomic Characteristics of Small Cell Lung Cancer in Never Smokers: Results From a Retrospective Multicenter Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) has the strongest association with smoking among lung cancers. The characteristics of never smokers with SCLC is not known.

RESEARCH QUESTION

Are the clinical characteristics, prognostic factors, survival, genomic alterations, and tumor mutational burdens of SCLC in patients who have never smoked different from those who have smoked?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

A retrospective multicenter cohort study of patients with clinician-confirmed SCLC was performed with the use of a longitudinal and nationally representative electronic medical records database. Smoking history was assessed through technology-enabled abstraction and confirmed for never smokers via chart review. Genomic characteristics of never smoker patients with SCLC were examined with the use of a next-generation sequencing-based gene panel and whole exome sequencing.

RESULTS

One hundred of 5,632 patients (1.8%) with SCLC were never smokers. Relative to smokers, never smokers were more likely to be female (66.0% vs 52.4%; P = .009) and present with extensive stage (70.0% vs 62.2%; P = .028). Never smokers had a higher proportion of patients in age groups 35 to 49 years (7.0% vs 3.0%; P = .006) and ≥80 years (17.0% vs 8.2%; P = .006). Known risk factors for lung cancer were found in <20% of never smokers. There were no overall survival differences between never smokers and smokers. Among patients with available genomic data (n = 9), never smoker SCLC were characterized by lower tumor mutational burden, a lower frequency of TP53 mutations, and an absence of mutational signatures related to tobacco exposure.

INTERPRETATION

The sex- and age-specific distribution of SCLC among never smokers, along with differences that were identified by genomic analyses, suggests a distinct biology of SCLC in never smokers compared with smokers.

Lung cancer in never smokers: The role of different risk factors other than tobacco smoking

Lung cancer (LC), the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide, is a complex and highly heterogeneous disease. Additional to its biological complexity, LC patients are often confronted with a high degree of stigma, mostly from the association of the disease with tobacco. Nonetheless, a proportion of LC patients are never-smokers, a population which we are beginning to comprehensively explore. Several risk factors have been linked to LC in never-smokers. Studies have consistently shown that radon exposure and domestic fuel smoke increase LC risk. Additionally, infections such as Mycobacterium tuberculosis, and Human Papilloma Virus are also risk factors. Other less conclusive associations include inflammatory diseases such as asthma and sarcoidosis. Moreover, we are now aware that molecular characteristics of LC vary widely according to smoking history, with important therapeutic implications. This review comprehensively assesses the current knowledge in terms of risk factors and disease characteristics in the never-smoker lung cancer population.

Confluent impact of housing and geology on indoor radon concentrations in Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Radon is a naturally released radioactive carcinogenic gas. To estimate radon exposure, studies have examined various risk factors, but limited information exists pertaining to the confluent impact of housing characteristics and geology. This study evaluated the efficacy of housing and geological characteristics to predict radon risk in DeKalb County, Georgia, USA. Four major types of data were used: (1) three databases of indoor radon concentrations (n = 6757); (2) geologic maps of rock types and fault zones; (3) a database of 402 in situ measurements of gamma emissions, and (4) two databases of housing characteristics. The Getis-Ord method was used to delineate hot spots of radon concentrations. Empirical Bayesian Kriging was used to predict gamma radiation at each radon test site. Chi-square tests, bivariate correlation coefficients, and logistic regression were used to examine the impact of geological and housing factors on radon. The results showed that indoor radon levels were more likely to exceed the action level-4 pCi/L (148 Bq/m³) designated by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency-in fault zones, were significantly positively correlated to gamma readings, but significantly negatively related to the presence of a crawlspace foundation and its combination with a slab. The findings suggest that fault mapping and in situ gamma ray measurements, coupled with analysis of foundation types and delineation of hot spots, may be used to prioritize areas for radon screening.

Multigene Mutation Profiling and Clinical Characteristics of Small-Cell Lung Cancer in Never-Smokers vs. Heavy Smokers (Geno1.3-CLICaP)

Objectives: Lung cancer is a heterogeneous disease. Presentation and prognosis are known to vary according to several factors, such as genetic and demographic characteristics. Small-cell lung cancer incidence is increasing in never-smokers. However, the disease phenotype in this population is different compared with patients who have a smoking history.

Material and Methods: To further investigate the clinical and genetic characteristics of this patient subgroup, a cohort of small cell lung cancer patients was divided into smokers (n = 10) and never/ever-smokers (n = 10). A somatic mutation profile was obtained using a comprehensive NGS assay. Clinical outcomes were compared using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional models.

Results: Median age was 63 years (46–81), 40% were men, and 90% had extended disease. Smoker patients had significantly more cerebral metastases (p = 0.04) and were older (p = 0.03) compared to their non-smoker counterparts. For never/ever smokers, the main genetic mutations were TP53 (80%), RB1 (40%), CYLD (30%), and EGFR (30%). Smoker patients had more RB1 (80%, p = 0.04), CDKN2A (30%, p = 0.05), and CEBPA (30%, p = 0.05) mutations. Response rates to first-line therapy with etoposide plus cisplatin/carboplatin were 50% in smokers and 90% in never/ever smokers (p = 0.141). Median overall survival was significantly longer in never smokers compared with smokers (29.1 months [23.5–34.6] vs. 17.3 months [4.8–29.7]; p = 0.0054). Never/ever smoking history (HR 0.543, 95% CI 0.41–0.80), limited-stage disease (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.40–0.91) and response to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy (HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.60–0.92) were independently associated with good prognosis.

Conclusion: Our data supports that never/ever smoker patients with small-cell lung cancer have better prognosis compared to their smoker counterparts. Further, patients with never/ever smoking history who present with small-cell lung cancer have a different mutation profile compared with smokers, including a high frequency of EGFR, MET, and SMAD4 mutations. Further studies are required to assess whether the differential mutation profile is a consequence of a diverse pathological mechanism for disease onset.

SOX2 promoter hypermethylation in non-smoking Taiwanese adults residing in air pollution areas

BACKGROUND

Both SOX2 promoter methylation and air pollution have been associated with lung cancer risk. However, little has been done to assess SOX2 promoter methylation in individuals living in air pollution areas. The aim of this study was to investigate SOX2 promoter methylation in non-smoking Taiwanese adults living in areas with different levels of air pollution especially particulate matter with diameter < 2.5 μm (PM2.5).

METHODS

A total of 1142 individuals aged 30-70 years were recruited. Data on SOX2 methylation, residence, age, and exposure to second-hand smoke (SHS) among others were extracted from the Taiwan Biobank dataset (2008-2015). After excluding former and current smokers, alongside those with incomplete information, a total of 461 non-smokers comprising 176 men and 285 women were included in the study. Participants' residences were grouped under northern and central/southern areas because air pollution (PM2.5) is lower in northern compared to central and southern areas.

RESULTS

The methylation levels in men (0.16310 ± 0.01230) and women (0.15740 ± 0.01240) were significantly different (P < .0001). In both sexes, the SOX2 promoter region was shown to be significantly hypermethylated in central and southern areas compared with the northern areas. The regression coefficient (β) was 0.00331 (P = 0.0257) in men and 0.00514 (P < .0001) in women.

CONCLUSION

SOX2 was significantly hypermethylated in both men and women residing in central and southern areas. The consistency in the results for both sexes shows that SOX2 promoter methylation could serve as a potential biomarker for industrial air pollution exposure. Moreover, it might reflect predisposition to cancer. Hence, healthy non-smokers at precancerous stages who have not been clinically diagnosed could be identified.

Residential radon and small cell lung cancer. A systematic review

Residential radon exposure is considered the second cause of lung cancer and the first in never smokers. Nevertheless, the association between the different histological types of lung cancer and radon is not completely clear, and radon effect on small cell lung cancer is not completely understood. We aim to asses the effect of residential radon exposure on the risk of small cell lung cancer (SCLC) in general population and miners through a systematic review applying predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. 16 studies were included. Most of them point to a relationship between indoor radon and SCLC, though some investigations show no association. When comparing the risk of SCLC due to radon exposure with NSCLC, it can be observed that an increased risk for SCLC is present. Small cell lung cancer seems to be the histological type of lung cancer most tightly related with residential radon.