1
|
Florou V, Floudas CS, Maoz A, Naqash AR, Norton C, Tan AC, Sokol ES, Frampton G, Soares HP, Puri S, Swami U, Wilky B, Hosein P, Trent J, Lopes GDL, Park W, Garrido-Laguna I. Real-world pan-cancer landscape of frameshift mutations and their role in predicting responses to immune checkpoint inhibitors in cancers with low tumor mutational burden. J Immunother Cancer 2023; 11:e007440. [PMID: 37586768 PMCID: PMC10432623 DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2023-007440] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/30/2023] [Indexed: 08/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pembrolizumab is FDA approved for tumors with tumor mutational burden (TMB) of ≥10 mutations/megabase (mut/Mb). However, the response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) varies significantly among cancer histologies. We describe the landscape of frameshift mutations (FSs) and evaluated their role as a predictive biomarker to ICI in a clinical cohort of patients. METHODS Comprehensive genomic profiling was performed on a cohort of solid tumor samples examining at least 324 genes. The clinical cohort included patients with metastatic solid malignancies who received ICI monotherapy and had tumor sequencing. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, and objective response rates (ORR) were compared between the groups. RESULTS We analyzed 246,252 microsatellite stable (MSS) and 4561 samples with microsatellite instability across solid tumors. Histologies were divided into groups according to TMB and FS. MSS distribution: TMB-L (<10 mut/Mb)/FS-A (absent FS) (N=111,065, 45%), TMB-H (≥10 mut/Mb)/FS-A (N=15,313, 6%), TMB-L/FS-P (present ≥1 FS) (N=98,389, 40%) and TMB-H/FS-P (N=21,485, 9%). FSs were predominantly identified in the p53 pathway. In the clinical cohort, 212 patients were included. Groups: TMB-L/FS-A (N=80, 38%), TMB-H/FS-A (N=36, 17%), TMB-L/FS-P (N=57, 27%), TMB-H/FS-P (N=39, 18%). FSs were associated with a higher ORR to ICI, 23.8% vs 12.8% (p=0.02). TMB-L/FS-P had superior median PFS (5.1 months) vs TMB-L/FS-A (3.6 months, p<0.01). The 12-month PFS probability was 34% for TMB-L/FS-P vs 17.1% for TMB-L/FS-A. CONCLUSIONS FSs are found in 47% of patients with MSS/TMB-L solid tumors in a pan-cancer cohort. FS may complement TMB in predicting immunotherapy responses, particularly for tumors with low TMB.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vaia Florou
- Medicine, University of Utah Health, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | | | - Asaf Maoz
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Abdul Rafeh Naqash
- Medical Oncology/TSET Phase 1 Program, The University of Oklahoma Stephenson Cancer Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA
| | - Carter Norton
- Medicine, University of Utah Health, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Aik Choon Tan
- Oncological Sciences and Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah Health, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Ethan S Sokol
- Foundation Medicine Inc, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | - Heloisa P Soares
- Medicine, University of Utah Health, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Sonam Puri
- Medicine, University of Utah Health, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Umang Swami
- Medicine, University of Utah Health, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Breelyn Wilky
- Medicine, University of Colorado Denver Health Sciences Center, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Peter Hosein
- Medicine, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Jonathan Trent
- Medicine, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, Florida, USA
| | | | - Wungki Park
- Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Ignacio Garrido-Laguna
- Medicine, University of Utah Health, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chen KT, Madison R, Moore J, Jin D, Fleischmann Z, Newberg J, Schrock A, Bhardwaj N, Lofgren KT, He J, Frampton G, Hegde P, Fabrizio D, Pishvaian MJ, Ebot E, Singhi A, Sokol E. A Novel HRD Signature Is Predictive of FOLFIRINOX Benefit in Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer. Oncologist 2023:oyad178. [PMID: 37354528 PMCID: PMC10400136 DOI: 10.1093/oncolo/oyad178] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2023] [Accepted: 05/12/2023] [Indexed: 06/26/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pancreatic cancer (PC) represents an aggressive disease with median overall survival (OS) of less than 1 year in the front-line setting. FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine and paclitaxel (GP) are standard of care options for these patients; however, optimal selection of therapy is challenging. METHODS Comprehensive genomic profiling was performed on 8358 PC patients. Outcomes were available for 1149 metastatic PC patients treated with 1L FOLFIRINOX or GP. A scar-based measure of HRD was called using a machine learning-based algorithm incorporating copy number and indel features. RESULTS A scar-based HRD signature (HRDsig) was identified in 9% of patients. HRDsig significantly co-occurred with biallelic alterations in BRCA1/2, PALB2, BARD1, and RAD51C/D, but encompassed a larger population than that defined by BRCA1/BRCA2/PALB2 (9% vs. 6%). HRDsig was predictive of 1L FOLFIRNOX chemotherapy benefit with doubled OS relative to gemcitabine and paclitaxel (GP) (rwOS aHR 0.37 [0.22-0.62]), including 25% of the population with long-term (2 year+) survival in a real-world cohort of patients. Less benefit from FOLFIRINOX was observed in the HRDsig(-) population. Predictive value was seen in both the BRCA1/2/PALB2 mutant and wildtype populations, suggesting additional value to mutational profiling. CONCLUSION A scar-based HRD biomarker was identified in a significant fraction of PC patients and is predictive of FOLFIRINOX benefit. Incorporating a biomarker like HRDsig could identify the right patients for platinum chemotherapy and potentially reduce FOLFIRINOX use by over 40%, minimizing toxicities with similar survival outcomes. Confirmatory studies should be performed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Jay Moore
- Foundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Jie He
- Foundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | | | | | | | - Michael J Pishvaian
- Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, SKCC, Washington, DC, USA
| | | | - Aatur Singhi
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Green MF, Watson CH, Tait S, He J, Pavlick DC, Frampton G, Riedel J, Plichta JK, Armstrong AJ, Previs RA, Kauff N, Strickler JH, Datto MB, Berchuck A, Menendez CS. Concordance Between Genomic Alterations Detected by Tumor and Germline Sequencing: Results from a Tertiary Care Academic Center Molecular Tumor Board. Oncologist 2023; 28:33-39. [PMID: 35962742 PMCID: PMC9847540 DOI: 10.1093/oncolo/oyac164] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2022] [Accepted: 07/15/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The majority of tumor sequencing currently performed on cancer patients does not include a matched normal control, and in cases where germline testing is performed, it is usually run independently of tumor testing. The rates of concordance between variants identified via germline and tumor testing in this context are poorly understood. We compared tumor and germline sequencing results in patients with breast, ovarian, pancreatic, and prostate cancer who were found to harbor alterations in genes associated with homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) and increased hereditary cancer risk. We then evaluated the potential for a computational somatic-germline-zygosity (SGZ) modeling algorithm to predict germline status based on tumor-only comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) results. METHODS A retrospective chart review was performed using an academic cancer center's databases of somatic and germline sequencing tests, and concordance between tumor and germline results was assessed. SGZ modeling from tumor-only CGP was compared to germline results to assess this method's accuracy in determining germline mutation status. RESULTS A total of 115 patients with 146 total alterations were identified. Concordance rates between somatic and germline alterations ranged from 0% to 85.7% depending on the gene and variant classification. After correcting for differences in variant classification and filtering practices, SGZ modeling was found to have 97.2% sensitivity and 90.3% specificity for the prediction of somatic versus germline origin. CONCLUSIONS Mutations in HRD genes identified by tumor-only sequencing are frequently germline. Providers should be aware that technical differences related to assay design, variant filtering, and variant classification can contribute to discordance between tumor-only and germline sequencing test results. In addition, SGZ modeling had high predictive power to distinguish between mutations of somatic and germline origin without the need for a matched normal control, and could potentially be considered to inform clinical decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle F Green
- Department of Pathology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Catherine H Watson
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Sarah Tait
- Duke University, School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Jie He
- Foundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA
| | | | | | - Jinny Riedel
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | - Andrew J Armstrong
- Duke Cancer Institute Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers, Duke University, Durham NCUSA
| | - Rebecca A Previs
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Noah Kauff
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - John H Strickler
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA,Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Michael B Datto
- Department of Pathology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Andrew Berchuck
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Carolyn S Menendez
- Corresponding author: Carolyn S. Menendez, MD, Duke Cancer Center, 216 Ashville Ave Ste 20, Cary, NC 27518, USA. E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bailey ST, Li M, Thornton J, Yang L, Cui C, Hartman M, Frampton G, Decker B, Vietz C. Abstract 798: Comprehensive genomic profiling of tissue and liquid biopsies reveals the landscape of reversion mutations. Cancer Res 2022. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2022-798] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Loss of function mutations in homologous recombination (HR) repair genes predispose individuals to cancer due to the genomic instability brought about by the inability to properly repair DNA. These alterations may also identify patients eligible for treatment with poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors and platinum drugs that exploit synthetic lethality; however, resistance eventually occurs. This resistance is largely the result of reversion mutations, which restore the DNA repair function of mutated HR genes.
We employed a computational approach to identify patients with breast, ovarian, pancreas, or prostate cancer who underwent comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP; Foundation Medicine, Inc.) and had reversion mutations in the BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, RAD51C, or RAD51D genes. Reversion mutations were identified in six different categories: 1) missense mutations that occur at the same amino acid position as a deleterious alteration, 2) non-frameshift deletion mutations that encompass a deleterious alteration, 3) frameshift mutations that restore the open reading frame of another frameshift mutation, 4) splice-site mutations that occur at the same exon as a deleterious alteration, 5) copy number losses that remove a deleterious alteration, and 6) intragenic deletions that lead to loss of deleterious mutation.
Using our computational approach, we identified 483 patients who 1,112 reversion mutation pairs in both solid tissue- and liquid biopsy-derived samples. The most frequently observed category was a non-frameshift deletion of a deleterious mutation. Overall, a greater number of reversion mutations were found in liquid biopsy samples. BRCA2 was the most frequently reverted gene followed by BRCA1, PALB2, RAD51D, and RAD51C. BRCA1-mutated samples had up to six reversion mutations, and for BRCA2, we observed as many as 228 putative reversion pairs in one sample. PALB2, RAD51C, and RAD51D had no more than two reversion mutations. We further examined co-occurring alterations and found correlations with genes in multiple signaling pathways including the MYC signaling pathway, which contained more mutations in reversion-positive samples. Lastly, we explored real-world longitudinal data from reversion-positive samples and found that the presence of a reversion mutation was significantly associated with lower overall survival for breast, ovarian, and prostate cancer patients. In summary, we characterized the landscape of reversion mutations in patients who underwent tissue or liquid biopsy-based CGP during clinical cancer treatment. Our data provide a better perspective for the identification and treatment of cancers involving a reversion mechanism.
Citation Format: Shannon T. Bailey, Meijuan Li, James Thornton, Lei Yang, Chenming Cui, Mark Hartman, Garrett Frampton, Brennan Decker, Christine Vietz. Comprehensive genomic profiling of tissue and liquid biopsies reveals the landscape of reversion mutations [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 798.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Meijuan Li
- 1Foundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, MA
| | | | - Lei Yang
- 1Foundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, MA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Chen KT, Sharaf R, Frampton G, Albacker L, Ebot E. Abstract 1243: Identification of aneuploidy biomarkers associated with response to first-line treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer. Cancer Res 2022. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2022-1243] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: NCCN guidelines for first-line treatment of patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer includes either FOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine plus paclitaxel; however, these two treatment regimens have not been compared in a randomized clinical trial. In this study, we investigated genomic predictors of treatment response to guide this treatment decision.
Methods: We selected 1,250 patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer who were treated with first-line FOLFIRINOX (FOLF, n = 588) or gemcitabine plus paclitaxel (G+P, n = 662) within the nationwide de-identified Flatiron Health-Foundation Medicine clinico-genomic database (CGDB). The de-identified data originated from approximately 280 US cancer clinics (~800 sites of care). Comprehensive genomic profiling was performed by Foundation Medicine on tumor samples from each patient as part of the standard of care. Gain/loss status as well as loss of heterozygosity (LOH) status of each chromosome arm was assessed using a custom research-use only algorithm that utilizes copy number model calls for each segment and SNP MAF information from sequencing data. Univariable Cox proportional hazards regression was used to identify chromosome arm-level aneuploidies associated with survival in patients treated with first-line FOLF or G+P. In each treatment cohort, a multivariable Cox model was built using the bidirectional stepwise regression procedure to select aneuploidy features associated with survival. A binary risk score was calculated based on the linear predictor of the multivariable Cox model and categorized as high vs low using a median threshold.
Results: Among the FOLF-treated cohort, we identified six aneuploidy features associated with survival (Bonferroni adjusted p < 0.05). FOLF-treated patients with a low FOLF risk score had better survival compared to those with a high FOLF risk score (HR: 0.46, 95%CI: 0.34-0.61, p = <0.001). This association was not observed among G+P-treated patients (HR: 0.86, 95%CI: 0.66-1.11, p = 0.25). Among the G+P treated cohort; eight aneuploidy features were associated with survival (Bonferroni adjusted p < 0.05). G+P-treated patients with a low G+P risk score had better survival compared to patients with a high G+P risk score (HR: 0.43, 95%CI: 0.33-0.57, p = <0.001). This association was not observed among FOLF-treated patients (HR: 0.86, 95%CI: 0.66-1.12, p = 0.25). These findings remained after adjusting for clinical features including surgery and ECOG performance status (HRG+P: 0.52, p = <0.001; HRFOLF: 0.5, p = <0.001).
Conclusions: In metastatic pancreatic cancer, we found different chromosome arm-level aneuploidies were associated with survival for FOLF and G+P regimens which suggests an aneuploidy-based risk score may have utility in choosing first-line treatment.
Citation Format: Kuei-Ting Chen, Radwa Sharaf, Garrett Frampton, Lee Albacker, Ericka Ebot. Identification of aneuploidy biomarkers associated with response to first-line treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 1243.
Collapse
|
6
|
Carrot-Zhang J, Newberg J, Frampton G, Beroukhim R. Abstract 1166: Leveraging existing data to identify ancestry-associated features across multiple cancer types. Cancer Res 2022. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2022-1166] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
People with different ancestries inherit different risks and encounter different environmental exposures resulting in different somatic profiles. A lack of knowledge about ancestry-specific alterations is a major barrier to implementing precision medicine, leading to inequities in genetic testing, targeted treatment and clinical trial design for cancer patients from the underserved populations. However, a limited number of cancer cases from non-European populations have been sequenced in research setting, and paired normal samples are often not collected in routine clinical care. Here, we inferred African (AFR), South Asian (SAS), East Asian (EAS), American (AMR) and European (EUR) ancestry from comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) of over 200,000 tumors and identified 18717, 8588, 6594 patients with significant proportions of AFR, AMR, EAS ancestry, respectively. Using logistic regressions with age of diagnosis, gender and tumor mutation burden (TMB) as covariates, we identified 165 ancestry-associated genes across 14 common cancer types. We used reported race/ethnicity data in the AACR project GENIE cohort for validation. We found that endometrial carcinoma patients with AFR ancestry were enriched with TP53 mutations (OR=2.3, FDR corrected p=5x10-31) but lacked PTEN (OR=0.3, FDR corrected p=2x10-41) and KRAS (OR=0.5, FDR corrected p=8x10-13) mutations. In colorectal cancer, KRAS (OR=1.5, FDR corrected p=4x10-44) and APC (OR=1.4, FDR corrected p=1x10-16) mutations were enriched in patients with AFR ancestry, whereas BRAF mutations were depleted in both AFR (OR=0.5, FDR corrected p=5x10-24) and EAS (OR=0.6, FDR corrected p=6x10-5) patients. CDK12 mutations were enriched in both AFR (OR=1.6, FDR corrected p=2x10-4) and EAS (OR=3.1, FDR corrected p=2x10-7) prostate cancer patients. For patients with AMR ancestry, increased mutation frequency was observed in SETD2 in pancreatic cancer (OR=3.4, FDR corrected p=1x10-4), and VHL in renal clear cell carcinoma (OR=1.9, FDR corrected p=2x10-4). In GBM, TERT alterations were associated with EUR ancestry (OR=1.3, FDR corrected p=0.003). Interestingly, TMB-high status was associated with EUR ancestry in melanoma (OR=5.9, p=6x10-36) and anti-correlated with AFR ancestry in endometrial carcinoma (OR=0.7, p=1x10-6). Our large-scale ancestry analysis characterized the somatic landscape of non-European cancer patients. Future directions include quantifying the germline heritability of identified ancestry-associated mutations using a local ancestry risk score (LRS) and investigating ancestral effects on cancer prognosis and outcome using the GENIE cohort.
Citation Format: Jian Carrot-Zhang, Justin Newberg, Garrett Frampton, Rameen Beroukhim. Leveraging existing data to identify ancestry-associated features across multiple cancer types [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 1166.
Collapse
|
7
|
Antonarakis E, Moore J, Jin D, Chen T, Newberg J, Fleischmann Z, Murugesan K, Frampton G, Fabrizio D, Madison R, Sokol E. Abstract 1249: Development of a pan-cancer algorithm to predict homologous recombination deficiency and sensitivity to PARPi therapy. Cancer Res 2022. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2022-1249] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: PARP inhibitors (PARPi) are approved for multiple indications with ongoing trials to explore broader utility. However, identifying the right patients for these therapies across multiple disease types remains a challenge. In ovarian cancer, genomic-scar based measures for homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) are approved diagnostics (genome-wide LOH [gLOH] and genomic instability score [GIS]); however, broader utility has not been established.
Methods: A pan-cancer genomic profiling dataset (n = 202,472; Foundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA) was split 70:30 for training and validation of an HRD signature using an XGB machine learning model (mlHRD). A broad set of copy number (Macintyre 2018) and indel features (Alexandrov 2020) were used to identify signatures of HRD. gLOH (Coleman 2017) and GIS (Timms 2014) were calculated using copy number profiles. Biallelic alterations were predicted using a computational zygosity algorithm (Sun, 2018). The nationwide, de-identified Flatiron Health-Foundation Medicine ovarian and prostate clinico-genomic databases (FH-FMI CGDB) were utilized for outcomes analysis. The de-identified data originated from approximately 280 US cancer clinics (~800 sites of care). Time to therapy discontinuation (TTD) was estimated with Kaplan-Meier analysis. Hazard ratios were calculated using unadjusted Cox proportional Hazard models.
Results: We developed an algorithm to predict HRD status using indel and copy number features (see methods). Across the pan-cancer dataset, the rate of mlHRD was 6.4% with the highest frequency in fallopian tube (30%), ovarian (30%), peritoneal (23%), breast (16%), and prostate cancers (15%). Sensitivity to detect biallelic BRCA1/2 alterations was high across tumors [ovary (93%), prostate (87%), breast (85%), pancreas (80%)]. Beyond BRCA1/2, mlHRD positivity was associated with biallelic alterations in RAD51D (OR = 24, p<1E-10), PALB2 (OR = 23, p<1E-10), BARD1 (OR = 23, p<1E-10), and RAD51C (OR = 19, p<1E-10). In the FH-FMI CGDB ovarian cancer cohort, 150 patients were treated with PARPi (mlHRD positive = 73; negative = 77); mlHRD positivity was associated with improved TTD (median 8.9 mo v 3.9 mo; HR = 0.49 [0.34-0.71], p < 0.001), with similar predictive power to gLOH >16% (HR = 0.55 [0.38-0.79], p = 0.001) and GIS >42 (HR = 0.59 [0.41-0.86], p = 0.006). For 62 patients with prostate cancer treated with PARPi (mlHRD positive = 27; negative = 35), mlHRD was associated with prolonged TTD on PARPi (median 6.8 mo v 3.4 mo; HR = 0.56 [0.30-1.03], p = 0.064), trending more predictive than gLOH >8.29% (Sokol 2020) and GIS >42 (HR = 0.64 [0.29-1.40] and 0.80 [0.37-1.73], respectively; p>0.05).
Conclusion: These findings suggest that HRD is associated with genomic scarring beyond ovarian cancer. Additional retrospective and prospective analyses in clinical datasets are needed to explore the utility of this signature.
Citation Format: Emmanuel Antonarakis, Jay Moore, Dexter Jin, Tim Chen, Justin Newberg, Zoe Fleischmann, Karthikeyan Murugesan, Garrett Frampton, David Fabrizio, Russell Madison, Ethan Sokol. Development of a pan-cancer algorithm to predict homologous recombination deficiency and sensitivity to PARPi therapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 1249.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Tim Chen
- 2Foundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Sokol ES, Jin DX, Fine A, Trabucco SE, Maund S, Frampton G, Molinero L, Antonarakis ES. PARP Inhibitor Insensitivity to BRCA1/2 Monoallelic Mutations in Microsatellite Instability-High Cancers. JCO Precis Oncol 2022; 6:e2100531. [PMID: 35772050 PMCID: PMC9259120 DOI: 10.1200/po.21.00531] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To examine the overlap of homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) and microsatellite instability high (MSI-H) status, and to dissect driver versus bystander status of BRCA1/2 mutations (BRCAm) in this context. METHODS A pan-cancer comprehensive genomic profiling cohort (n = 213,199) was examined for overlap between BRCAm and MSI-H status. BRCA1/2 variant zygosity was examined and correlated with MSI-H status, tumor mutational burden, and genome-wide loss of heterozygosity (gLOH). Clinical histories of two patients with prostate cancer with co-occurring BRCAm and MSI-H are described. RESULTS HRD and MSI-H phenotypes were generally mutually exclusive events (P < .001). BRCAm that co-occurred together with high tumor mutational burden or MSI-H were predominantly monoallelic bystander alterations. In breast, ovarian, and pancreatic cancers, very few BRCAm occurred in the context of MSI-H; however, in prostate cancer, 12.8% of BRCA1 and 3.4% of BRCA2 alterations co-occurred with MSI-H. In these BRCA-associated cancers, co-occurring BRCAm were generally monoallelic and were not associated with elevated gLOH. Two patients with prostate cancer with co-occurring BRCAm and MSI-H showed resistance to poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibition but sensitivity to subsequent anti–programmed cell death protein 1 therapy. CONCLUSION MSI-H status and HRD are generally mutually exclusive phenomena across cancer types, but may rarely co-occur, especially in prostate cancer. Although MSI-H samples had a higher BRCAm prevalence relative to microsatellite-stable tumors, these BRCA1/2 mutations were generally monoallelic and were not associated with elevated gLOH. Our findings suggest that most BRCAm coexisting with microsatellite instability are likely bystander events that may not result in sensitivity to poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors. ![]()
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Emmanuel S Antonarakis
- Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.,University of Minnesota Masonic Cancer Center, Minneapolis, MN
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Zhang L, Hamdani O, Gjoerup O, Cho-Phan C, Snider J, Castellanos E, Nimeiri H, Frampton G, Venstrom JM, Oxnard G, Klempner SJ, Schrock AB. ERBB2 Copy Number as a Quantitative Biomarker for Real-World Outcomes to Anti-Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Therapy in Advanced Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma. JCO Precis Oncol 2022; 6:e2100330. [PMID: 35050711 PMCID: PMC8789214 DOI: 10.1200/po.21.00330] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) overexpression or amplification (ERBB2amp) are biomarkers for approved anti-HER2 therapies. ERBB2amp may better predict response compared with immunohistochemistry or in situ hybridization, and quantitative copy number (CN) may further stratify patients. We characterized ERBB2amp in advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinomas (GEA) and hypothesized that increased CN was associated with better outcome to trastuzumab. METHODS Comprehensive genomic profiling, including assessment of ERBB2amp, was performed for 12,905 GEA tissue cases. Clinical outcomes were assessed using a clinicogenomic database linking deidentified electronic health record–derived clinical data to genomic data. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard models were used for real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) comparisons. RESULTS ERBB2amp (CN ≥ 5) was detected in 15% (1,934 of 12,905) of GEA; median CN 22 (interquartile range 9-73). Median ERBB2 amplicon size was 0.27 megabase (interquartile range 0.13-0.95), and smaller amplicons were associated with higher CN (P < .001). In the clinicogenomic database, of 101 evaluable first-line trastuzumab-treated patients, ERBB2 CN was a significant predictor of rwPFS as a continuous variable (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.73; 95% CI, 0.60 to 0.89; P = .002), whereas ERBB2 CN was not predictive of rwPFS on chemotherapy (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.93; 95% CI, 0.73 to 1.20; P = .59). Among trastuzumab-treated patients, no significant associations with ERBB2 CN were observed for disease site, age, stage at advanced diagnosis, or most selected coalterations. CONCLUSION ERBB2amp was detected in 15% of GEA tissue samples, with significant diversity in ERBB2 CN and amplicon focality. ERBB2 CN was predictive of rwPFS as a continuous variable for patients treated with trastuzumab. Further studies exploring the clinical utility of quantitative ERBB2 CN, particularly in the setting of the evolving anti-HER2 landscape and combination therapies, are warranted. ERBB2 copy number is a quantitative biomarker for outcomes to anti-HER2 therapy in advanced gastroesophageal cancer.![]()
Collapse
|
10
|
Nussbaumer-Streit B, Ellen M, Klerings I, Sfetcu R, Riva N, Mahmić-Kaknjo M, Poulentzas G, Martinez P, Baladia E, Ziganshina LE, Marqués ME, Aguilar L, Kassianos AP, Frampton G, Silva AG, Affengruber L, Spjker R, Thomas J, Berg RC, Kontogiani M, Sousa M, Kontogiorgis C, Gartlehner G. Resource use during systematic review production varies widely: a scoping review. J Clin Epidemiol 2021; 139:287-296. [PMID: 34091021 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.05.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2021] [Revised: 05/21/2021] [Accepted: 05/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We aimed to map the resource use during systematic review (SR) production and reasons why steps of the SR production are resource intensive to discover where the largest gain in improving efficiency might be possible. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING We conducted a scoping review. An information specialist searched multiple databases (e.g., Ovid MEDLINE, Scopus) and implemented citation-based and grey literature searching. We employed dual and independent screenings of records at the title/abstract and full-text levels and data extraction. RESULTS We included 34 studies. Thirty-two reported on the resource use-mostly time; four described reasons why steps of the review process are resource intensive. Study selection, data extraction, and critical appraisal seem to be very resource intensive, while protocol development, literature search, or study retrieval take less time. Project management and administration required a large proportion of SR production time. Lack of experience, domain knowledge, use of collaborative and SR-tailored software, and good communication and management can be reasons why SR steps are resource intensive. CONCLUSION Resource use during SR production varies widely. Areas with the largest resource use are administration and project management, study selection, data extraction, and critical appraisal of studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - M Ellen
- Department of Health Systems Management, Guilford Glazer Faculty of Business and Management and Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Israel; Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School Of Public Health, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - I Klerings
- Cochrane Austria, Danube University Krems, Krems a.d. Donau, Austria
| | - R Sfetcu
- National School of Public Health, Management and Professional Development Bucharest, Romania; Spiru Haret University, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences
| | - N Riva
- Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Malta, Msida, Malta
| | - M Mahmić-Kaknjo
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Cantonal Hospital Zenica, Zenica, Bosnia and Herzegovina; Faculty of Medicine, University of Zenica, Zenica, Bosnia and Herzegovina
| | - G Poulentzas
- Laboratory of Hygiene and Environmental Protection, Department of Medicine, Democritus University of Thrace
| | - P Martinez
- Centro de Análisis de la Evidencia Científica, Academia Española de Nutrición y Dietética, España; Techné research group. Department of knowledge engineering of the Faculty of Science. University of Granada. Spain
| | - E Baladia
- Centro de Análisis de la Evidencia Científica, Academia Española de Nutrición y Dietética, España
| | - L E Ziganshina
- Cochrane Russia at the Russian Medical Academy for Continuing Professional Education (RMANPO) of the Ministry of Health of Russian Federation and the Kazan State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of Russian Federation
| | - M E Marqués
- Centro de Análisis de la Evidencia Científica, Academia Española de Nutrición y Dietética, España
| | - L Aguilar
- Centro de Análisis de la Evidencia Científica, Academia Española de Nutrición y Dietética, España
| | - A P Kassianos
- Department of Applied Health Research, University College London, London, UK; Department of Psychology, University of Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - G Frampton
- Southampton Health Technology Assessments Centre (SHTAC), Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, UK
| | - A G Silva
- School of Health Sciences & CINTESIS.UA, University of Aveiro, Campus UNiversitário de Santiago, Portugal
| | - L Affengruber
- Cochrane Austria, Danube University Krems, Krems a.d. Donau, Austria; Department of Family Medicine, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, The Netherlands
| | - R Spjker
- Cochrane Netherlands, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Amsterdam UMC, Univ of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health, Medical Library, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - R C Berg
- Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
| | - M Kontogiani
- Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, School of Health Sciences and Education, Harokopio University, Athens, Greece
| | - M Sousa
- Nutrition & Metabolism, NOVA Medical School, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Campo dos Mártires da Pátria, 1169-056 Lisboa, Portugal; CINTESIS, NOVA Medical School, NMS, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Campo dos Mártires da Pátria, 1169-056 Lisboa, Portugal
| | - C Kontogiorgis
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Zenica, Zenica, Bosnia and Herzegovina
| | - G Gartlehner
- Cochrane Austria, Danube University Krems, Krems a.d. Donau, Austria; RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Pham TV, Goodman AM, Sivakumar S, Frampton G, Kurzrock R. Intra-patient stability of tumor mutational burden from tissue biopsies at different time points in advanced cancers. Genome Med 2021; 13:159. [PMID: 34641956 PMCID: PMC8513181 DOI: 10.1186/s13073-021-00979-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2021] [Accepted: 09/29/2021] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Tumor mutational burden (TMB) may be a predictive biomarker of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) responsiveness. Genomic landscape heterogeneity is a well-established cancer feature. Molecular characteristics may differ even within the same tumor specimen and undoubtedly evolve with time. However, the degree to which TMB differs between tumor biopsies within the same patient has not been established. Methods We curated data on 202 patients enrolled in the PREDICT study (NCT02478931), seen at the University of California San Diego (UCSD), who had 404 tissue biopsies for TMB (two per patient, mean of 722 days between biopsies) to assess difference in TMB before and after treatment in a pan-cancer cohort. We also performed an orthogonal analysis of 2872 paired pan-solid tumor biopsies in the Foundation Medicine database to examine difference in TMB between first and last biopsies. Results The mean (95% CI) TMB difference between samples was 0.583 [− 0.900–2.064] (p = 0.15). Pearson correlation showed a flat line for time elapsed between biopsies versus TMB change indicating no correlation (R2 = 0.0001; p = 0.8778). However, in 55 patients who received ICIs, there was an increase in TMB (before versus after mean mutations/megabase [range] 12.50 [range, 0.00–98.31] versus 14.14 [range, 0.00–100.0], p = 0.025). Analysis of 2872 paired pan-solid tumor biopsies in the Foundation Medicine database also indicated largely stable TMB patterns; TMB increases were only observed in specific tumors (e.g., breast, colorectal, glioma) within certain time intervals. Conclusions Overall, our results suggest that tissue TMB remains stable with time, though specific therapies such as immunotherapy may correlate with an increase in TMB. Trial registration NCT02478931, registered June 23, 2015. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13073-021-00979-8.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy V Pham
- Center for Personalized Cancer Therapy, University of California San Diego (UCSD), 3855 Health Sciences Drive, La Jolla, CA, 92037, USA
| | - Aaron M Goodman
- Center for Personalized Cancer Therapy, University of California San Diego (UCSD), 3855 Health Sciences Drive, La Jolla, CA, 92037, USA. .,Division of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, UCSD, 3855 Health Sciences Drive, MC-0960, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA.
| | - Smruthy Sivakumar
- Foundation Medicine, Inc, 150 Second Street, Cambridge, MA, 02141, USA
| | - Garrett Frampton
- Foundation Medicine, Inc, 150 Second Street, Cambridge, MA, 02141, USA
| | - Razelle Kurzrock
- Center for Personalized Cancer Therapy, University of California San Diego (UCSD), 3855 Health Sciences Drive, La Jolla, CA, 92037, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Negrao M, Schmidt S, Sui D, Sharaf R, Kemp H, Lewis W, Bristow C, Frampton G, Lee J, Heymach J, Gibbons D, Albacker L, Skoulidis F. MA09.07 Genomic Landscape and Clinical Outcomes With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in NF1-Mutant NSCLC. J Thorac Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2021.08.157] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
13
|
Negrao MV, Skoulidis F, Montesion M, Schulze K, Bara I, Shen V, Xu H, Hu S, Sui D, Elamin YY, Le X, Goldberg ME, Murugesan K, Wu CJ, Zhang J, Barreto DS, Robichaux JP, Reuben A, Cascone T, Gay CM, Mitchell KG, Hong L, Rinsurongkawong W, Roth JA, Swisher SG, Lee J, Tsao A, Papadimitrakopoulou V, Gibbons DL, Glisson BS, Singal G, Miller VA, Alexander B, Frampton G, Albacker LA, Shames D, Zhang J, Heymach JV. Oncogene-specific differences in tumor mutational burden, PD-L1 expression, and outcomes from immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer. J Immunother Cancer 2021; 9:jitc-2021-002891. [PMID: 34376553 PMCID: PMC8356172 DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2021-002891] [Citation(s) in RCA: 97] [Impact Index Per Article: 32.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients bearing targetable oncogene alterations typically derive limited benefit from immune checkpoint blockade (ICB), which has been attributed to low tumor mutation burden (TMB) and/or PD-L1 levels. We investigated oncogene-specific differences in these markers and clinical outcome. METHODS Three cohorts of NSCLC patients with oncogene alterations (n=4189 total) were analyzed. Two clinical cohorts of advanced NSCLC patients treated with ICB monotherapy [MD Anderson (MDACC; n=172) and Flatiron Health-Foundation Medicine Clinico-Genomic Database (CGDB; n=894 patients)] were analyzed for clinical outcome. The FMI biomarker cohort (n=4017) was used to assess the association of oncogene alterations with TMB and PD-L1 expression. RESULTS High PD-L1 expression (PD-L1 ≥50%) rate was 19%-20% in classic EGFR, EGFR exon 20 and HER2-mutant tumors, and 34%-55% in tumors with ALK, BRAF V600E, ROS1, RET, or MET alterations. Compared with KRAS-mutant tumors, BRAF non-V600E group had higher TMB (9.6 vs KRAS 7.8 mutations/Mb, p=0.003), while all other oncogene groups had lower TMB (p<0.001). In the two clinical cohorts treated with ICB, molecular groups with EGFR, HER2, ALK, ROS1, RET, or MET alterations had short progression-free survival (PFS; 1.8-3.7 months), while BRAF V600E group was associated with greater clinical benefit from ICB (CGDB cohort: PFS 9.8 months vs KRAS 3.7 months, HR 0.66, p=0.099; MDACC cohort: response rate 62% vs KRAS 24%; PFS 7.4 vs KRAS 2.8 months, HR 0.36, p=0.026). KRAS G12C and non-G12C subgroups had similar clinical benefit from ICB in both cohorts. In a multivariable analysis, BRAF V600E mutation (HR 0.58, p=0.041), PD-L1 expression (HR 0.57, p=0.022), and high TMB (HR 0.66, p<0.001) were associated with longer PFS. CONCLUSIONS High TMB and PD-L1 expression are predictive for benefit from ICB treatment in oncogene-driven NSCLCs. NSCLC harboring BRAF mutations demonstrated superior benefit from ICB that may be attributed to higher TMB and higher PD-L1 expression in these tumors. Meanwhile EGFR and HER2 mutations and ALK, ROS1, RET, and MET fusions define NSCLC subsets with minimal benefit from ICB despite high PD-L1 expression in NSCLC harboring oncogene fusions. These findings indicate a TMB/PD-L1-independent impact on sensitivity to ICB for certain oncogene alterations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcelo V Negrao
- Department of Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Ferdinandos Skoulidis
- Department of Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | | | | | - Ilze Bara
- Genentech Inc, South San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Vincent Shen
- Genentech Inc, South San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Hao Xu
- Genentech Inc, South San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Sylvia Hu
- Genentech Inc, South San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Dawen Sui
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Yasir Y Elamin
- Department of Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Xiuning Le
- Department of Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | | | | | - Chang-Jiun Wu
- Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Jianhua Zhang
- Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - David S Barreto
- Department of Radiology, Breast Imaging and Interventional Center, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Jacqulyne P Robichaux
- Department of Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Alexandre Reuben
- Department of Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Tina Cascone
- Department of Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Carl M Gay
- Department of Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Kyle G Mitchell
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Lingzhi Hong
- Department of Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Waree Rinsurongkawong
- Department of Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Jack A Roth
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Stephen G Swisher
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Jack Lee
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Anne Tsao
- Department of Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | | | - Don L Gibbons
- Department of Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Bonnie S Glisson
- Department of Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Gaurav Singal
- Foundation Medicine Inc, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - David Shames
- Genentech Inc, South San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Jianjun Zhang
- Department of Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - John V Heymach
- Department of Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Huang RSP, Murugesan K, Montesion M, Pavlick DC, Mata DA, Hiemenz MC, Decker B, Frampton G, Albacker LA, Ross JS. Pan-cancer landscape of CD274 (PD-L1) copy number changes in 244 584 patient samples and the correlation with PD-L1 protein expression. J Immunother Cancer 2021; 9:e002680. [PMID: 33972391 PMCID: PMC8112409 DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2021-002680] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/09/2021] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Several studies have shown clinical outcomes data that support the use of CD274 (PD-L1) copy-number (CN) gains and/or losses as a biomarker for immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICPI). Here, we present the landscape of CD274 CN changes across a large cohort of solid tumor cases and correlate these with PD-L1 protein expression by immunohistochemistry. METHODS We analyzed all cases that underwent comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) testing at Foundation Medicine between August 2014 and June 2020. CD274 CN changes were correlated with PD-L1 expression in tumor types where there were Food and Drug Administration approved companion diagnostic (CDx) claims and the CDx assay was used to assess PD-L1 expression. RESULTS In all, 244 584 samples representing 290 solid tumor types were included in the study. Overall, 17.6% (42 983/244 584) had CD274 CN gains (>specimen ploidy), 44.6% (108 970/244 584) were CD274 CN neutral, and 37.9% (92 631/244 584) had CD274 CN loss. Using different CN cut offs to define CD274 positivity resulted in different prevalence estimates: ploidy +1, 17.4% (42 636/244 584); ploidy +2, 6.2% (15 183/244 584); ploidy +3, 2.2% (5375/244 584); ploidy +4, 1.1% (2712/244 584); and ploidy +8, 0.2% (434/244 584). The prevalence of CN changes and CN positivity varied based on tumor type. CD274 CN gains were significantly associated with PD-L1 positivity in NSCLC, urothelial carcinoma, breast carcinoma, cervical carcinoma, esophagus squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and head and neck SCC (ORs 3.3, 3.0, 2.0, 4.5. 3.8, 8.4, 1.4, respectively; p<0.05) and with microsatellite instability status in only clinically relevant tumor types (gastric adenocarcinoma, colorectal adenocarcinoma, uterine endometrial adenocarcinoma, esophageal adenocarcinoma and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (OR: 5.2, 1.9, 3.2, 3.7 and 6.5, respectively; p<0.05)). Conversely, CD274 CN changes were not significantly correlated with tumor mutational burden in almost all the tumor types. CONCLUSION CD274 CN changes and PD-L1 expression were highly correlated in multiple tumor types. These prevalence data on CD274 CN changes across a large cohort of different solid tumors can be used to design future clinical studies to assess whether CD274 CN changes could be a potential biomarker for ICPI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Jeffrey S Ross
- Foundation Medicine Inc, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Pathology, State University of New York (SUNY) Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Huang RSP, Severson E, Haberberger J, Duncan DL, Hemmerich A, Edgerly C, Ferguson NL, Frampton G, Owens C, Williams E, Elvin J, Vergilio JA, Killian JK, Lin D, Morley S, McEwan D, Holmes O, Danziger N, Cohen MB, Sathyan P, McGregor K, Reddy P, Venstrom J, Anhorn R, Alexander B, Brown C, Ross JS, Ramkissoon SH. Landscape of Biomarkers in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Using Comprehensive Genomic Profiling and PD-L1 Immunohistochemistry. Pathol Oncol Res 2021; 27:592997. [PMID: 34257540 PMCID: PMC8262230 DOI: 10.3389/pore.2021.592997] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2020] [Accepted: 01/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) are important biomarker tools used for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) given the expanding number of standard-of-care therapies that require companion diagnostic testing. We examined 9450 NSCLC real-world patient samples that underwent both CGP and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) IHC to understand the biomarker landscape in this patient cohort. By assessing National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN)-recommended biomarkers including genomic alterations, tumor mutational burden (≥10 mutations/Mb cut-off), and PD-L1 expression (Tumor Proportion Score (TPS) ≥ 50% cut-off), we show that CGP + PD-L1 IHC yielded potentially actionable results for 70.5% of the 9,450 patients with NSCLC. Among the remaining 29.5% (2,789/9,450) of patients, 86.7% (2,419/2,789) were potentially eligible for another biomarker-associated therapy and/or clinical trial based on their genomic profile. In addition, in the PD-L1TPS≥50% disease subset, BRAF mutations, MET mutations, MET amplifications, and KRAS mutations were significantly enriched; and in the PD-L1TPS<50%, EGFR mutations, ERBB2 mutations, STK11 mutations, and KEAP1 mutations were enriched. These findings highlight the improved clinical utility of combining CGP with IHC to expand the biomarker-guided therapeutic options available for patients with NSCLC, relative to single biomarker testing alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Eric Severson
- Foundation Medicine, Inc., Morrisville, NC, United States
| | | | | | | | - Claire Edgerly
- Foundation Medicine, Inc., Morrisville, NC, United States
| | | | | | - Clarence Owens
- Foundation Medicine, Inc., Morrisville, NC, United States
| | - Erik Williams
- Foundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, MA, United States
| | - Julia Elvin
- Foundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, MA, United States
| | | | | | - Douglas Lin
- Foundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, MA, United States
| | | | | | - Oliver Holmes
- Foundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, MA, United States
| | | | - Michael B Cohen
- Wake Forest Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, United States.,Department of Pathology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, United States
| | | | | | | | | | - Rachel Anhorn
- Foundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, MA, United States
| | | | | | - Jeffrey S Ross
- Foundation Medicine, Inc., Morrisville, NC, United States.,Department of Pathology, State University of New York (SUNY) Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, United States
| | - Shakti H Ramkissoon
- Foundation Medicine, Inc., Morrisville, NC, United States.,Wake Forest Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, United States.,Department of Pathology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, United States
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Huang RS, Li X, Haberberger J, Sokol E, Severson E, Duncan DL, Hemmerich A, Edgerly C, Williams E, Elvin J, Vergilio J, Killian JK, Lin D, Hiemenz M, Xiao J, McEwan D, Holmes O, Danziger N, Erlich R, Frampton G, Cohen MB, McGregor K, Reddy P, Cardeiro D, Anhorn R, Venstrom J, Alexander B, Brown C, Pusztai L, Ross JS, Ramkissoon SH. Biomarkers in Breast Cancer: An Integrated Analysis of Comprehensive Genomic Profiling and PD-L1 Immunohistochemistry Biomarkers in 312 Patients with Breast Cancer. Oncologist 2020; 25:943-953. [PMID: 32869930 PMCID: PMC7648336 DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2020-0449] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2020] [Accepted: 08/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We examined the current biomarker landscape in breast cancer when programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) testing is integrated with comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP). MATERIAL AND METHODS We analyzed data from samples of 312 consecutive patients with breast carcinoma tested with both CGP and PD-L1 (SP142) immunohistochemistry (IHC) during routine clinical care. These samples were stratified into hormone receptor positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor negative (HER2-; n = 159), HER2-positive (n = 32), and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) cohorts (n = 121). RESULTS We found that in the TNBC cohort, 43% (52/121) were immunocyte PD-L1-positive, and in the HR+/HER2- cohort, 30% (48/159) had PIK3CA companion diagnostics mutations, and hence were potentially eligible for atezolizumab plus nab-paclitaxel or alpelisib plus fulvestrant, respectively. Of the remaining 212 patients, 10.4% (22/212) had a BRCA1/2 mutation, which, if confirmed by germline testing, would allow olaparib plus talazoparib therapy. Of the remaining 190 patients, 169 (88.9%) were positive for another therapy-associated marker or a marker that would potentially qualify the patient for a clinical trial. In addition, we examined the relationship between immunocyte PD-L1 positivity and different tumor mutation burden (TMB) cutoffs and found that when a TMB cutoff of ≥9 mutations per Mb was applied (cutoff determined based on prior publication), 11.6% (14/121) patients were TMB ≥9 mutations/Mb and of these, TMB ≥9 mutations per Mb, 71.4% (10/14) were also positive for PD-L1 IHC. CONCLUSION Our integrated PD-L1 and CGP methodology identified 32% of the tested patients as potentially eligible for at least one of the two new Food and Drug Administration approved therapies, atezolizumab or alpelisib, and an additional 61.2% (191/312) had other biomarker-guided potential therapeutic options. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE This integrated programmed death-ligand 1 immunohistochemistry and comprehensive genomic profiling methodology identified 32% of the tested patients as eligible for at least one of the two new Food and Drug Administration-approved therapies, atezolizumab or alpelisib, and an additional 61.2% (191/312) had other biomarker-guided potential therapeutic options. These findings suggest new research opportunities to evaluate the predictive utility of other commonly seen PIK3CA mutations in hormone receptor-positive breast cancers and to standardize tumor mutation burden cutoffs to evaluate its potentially predictive role in triple-negative breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Xinyan Li
- Foundation Medicine, Inc.MorrisvilleNorth CarolinaUSA
| | | | - Ethan Sokol
- Foundation Medicine, Inc.CambridgeMassachusettsUSA
| | - Eric Severson
- Foundation Medicine, Inc.MorrisvilleNorth CarolinaUSA
| | | | | | | | | | - Julia Elvin
- Foundation Medicine, Inc.CambridgeMassachusettsUSA
| | | | | | - Douglas Lin
- Foundation Medicine, Inc.CambridgeMassachusettsUSA
| | | | - Jinpeng Xiao
- Foundation Medicine, Inc.MorrisvilleNorth CarolinaUSA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Michael B. Cohen
- Wake Forest Comprehensive Cancer Center and Department of Pathology, Wake Forest School of MedicineWinston‐SalemNorth CarolinaUSA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Jeffrey S. Ross
- Foundation Medicine, Inc.CambridgeMassachusettsUSA
- Department of Pathology, State University of New York (SUNY) Upstate Medical UniversitySyracuseNew YorkUSA
| | - Shakti H. Ramkissoon
- Foundation Medicine, Inc.MorrisvilleNorth CarolinaUSA
- Wake Forest Comprehensive Cancer Center and Department of Pathology, Wake Forest School of MedicineWinston‐SalemNorth CarolinaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Shao C, Li G, Huang L, Pruitt S, Castellanos E, Frampton G, Carson KR, Snow T, Singal G, Fabrizio D, Alexander BM, Jin F, Zhou W. Prevalence of High Tumor Mutational Burden and Association With Survival in Patients With Less Common Solid Tumors. JAMA Netw Open 2020; 3:e2025109. [PMID: 33119110 PMCID: PMC7596577 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.25109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 79] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Tumor mutational burden (TMB) is a potential biomarker associated with response to immune checkpoint inhibitor therapies. The prognostic value associated with TMB in the absence of immunotherapy is uncertain. OBJECTIVE To assess the prevalence of high TMB (TMB-H) and its association with overall survival (OS) among patients not treated with immunotherapy with the same 10 tumor types from the KEYNOTE-158 study. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This retrospective cohort study evaluated the prognostic value of TMB-H, assessed by Foundation Medicine (FMI) and defined as at least 10 mutations/megabase (mut/Mb) in the absence of immunotherapy. Data were sourced from the deidentified Flatiron Health-FMI clinicogenomic database collected up to July 31, 2018. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older with any of the following solid cancer types: anal, biliary, endometrial, cervical, vulvar, small cell lung, thyroid, salivary gland, mesothelioma, or neuroendocrine tumor. Patients with microsatellite instability-high tumors were excluded from primary analysis. For OS analysis, patients were excluded if immunotherapy started on the FMI report date or earlier or if patients died before January 1, 2012, and patients were censored if immunotherapy was started later than the FMI report date. Data were analyzed from November 2018 to February 2019. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Overall survival was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards model, adjusting for age, sex, cancer types, practice type, and albumin level. RESULTS Of 2589 eligible patients, 1671 (64.5%) were women, and the mean (SD) age was 63.7 (11.7) years. Median (interquartile range) TMB was 2.6 (1.7-6.1) mut/Mb, and 332 patients (12.8%) had TMB-H (≥10 mut/Mb). Prevalence of TMB-H was highest among patients with small cell lung cancer (40.0%; 95% CI, 34.7%-45.6%) and neuroendocrine tumor (29.3%; 95% CI, 22.8%-36.6%) and lowest was among patients with mesothelioma (1.2%; 95% CI, 0.3%-4.4%) and thyroid cancer (2.7%; 95% CI, 1.2%-5.7%). Adjusted hazard ratio for OS of patients not treated with immunotherapy with TMB-H vs those without TMB-H was 0.94 (95% CI, 0.77-1.13). Comparable results were observed when including patients with high microsatellite instability tumors and calculating OS from first observed antineoplastic treatment date. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE These findings suggest that prevalence of TMB-H varies widely depending on tumor type and TMB-H does not appear to be a factor associated with OS among patients across these cancer types treated in the absence of immunotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Gerald Li
- Foundation Medicine, Cambridge, Massachusetts
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Fan Jin
- Merck and Co, Kenilworth, New Jersey
| | - Wei Zhou
- Merck and Co, Kenilworth, New Jersey
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Abstract
Background High tumor mutational burden (TMB) predicts checkpoint blockade responsiveness, although the association with outcomes may be nuanced in certain tissue contexts. The correlation between TMB and cytotoxic chemotherapy sensitivity is unknown. This study evaluated the relationship between TMB and outcome in patients with solid tumors receiving cytotoxic chemotherapy. Methods University of California San Diego patients who received cytotoxic chemotherapy within one year after biopsy for TMB evaluation were included in a retrospective analysis. Physician notes and imaging reports in the electronic medical record were reviewed to determine clinical benefit and progression-free survival (PFS). Results Among 1526 patients with TMB availability, there were 294 eligible patients who received chemotherapy. There were no significant differences in TMB between those with stable disease ≥6 months/partial response/complete response versus others (t-test, p = .22). There were no significant differences in PFS for patients with TMB <10 vs. TMB ≥10 mutations/Mb (log-rank test, median and 95% CI: 6.0 (4.8–7.4) vs. 5.4 (4.3–6.6) months; p = .21). Nor were there significant differences in PFS for patients with a TMB <10 vs. TMB ≥10 mutations/mb for breast (p = .07), lung (p = .47), or gastrointestinal cancer (p = .53). Conclusions In summary, TMB was not predictive of stable disease ≥6 months/partial response/complete response or PFS in patients receiving cytotoxic chemotherapy. Trials Registration NCT02478931
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mina Nikanjam
- Center for Personalized Cancer Therapy and Division of Hematology and Oncology, UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Paul Riviere
- Center for Personalized Cancer Therapy and Division of Hematology and Oncology, UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Aaron Goodman
- Division of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Donald A Barkauskas
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Biostatistics Division, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Garrett Frampton
- Department of Cancer Genomics Research, Foundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Razelle Kurzrock
- Center for Personalized Cancer Therapy and Division of Hematology and Oncology, UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center, San Diego, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Koga Y, Song H, Chalmers Z, Newberg J, Frampton G, Campbell J, Huang F. Abstract D120: Similarities and differences between genomic profiles of prostate cancers from African American and European American men with implications for precision cancer medicine. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2020. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7755.disp19-d120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background: African American (AA) men have the highest mortality rate from prostate cancer compared to men from other races. Differences in the spectrum of somatic genomic alterations in tumors between AA men differs from non-AA men has not been well characterized as relatively few AA men have been included in prostate cancer genomic studies. To address this, we examined 5 publicly-available and commercial genomic datasets containing AA men with prostate cancer to identify novel alterations associated with race. Methods: In a meta-analysis of 4 public datasets, we investigated the mutational frequencies of 14 genes across 252 AA men and 635 non-AA men with primary prostate cancer. We also examined genomic alterations from the tumors of 436 AA men and 3018 EA men with primary or metastatic prostate cancer using the Foundation One assay. Results: We identified mutations in ZFHX3 and focal deletions in ETV3 more frequently in tumors from AA patients. The mutational frequency of TP53 was strongly associated with increasing Gleason grade. Using the commercial assay, we identified alterations in PTEN and TMPRSS2-ERG as less frequent in AA patients compared to non-AA patients in both primary and metastatic tumors. MYC amplifications were more frequent in AA patients with metastatic prostate cancer. Furthermore, we found that genomic alterations in KMT2D and CCND1 were more frequent in primary prostate tumors from AA patients, resulting in differential cell cycle genes and KMT alterations. MYC amplifications were more frequent in AA patients with metastatic prostate cancer. Genomic alterations in DNA repair genes were found at similar frequencies between EA and AA patients. Conclusion: While these results indicate that differences in mutational profiles may exist between racial groups in prostate cancers, additional sequencing studies that profile AA and EA men from the same clinical setting and that are matched for clinical covariates may be needed to confirm these findings. Overall, these results have implications for applying precision cancer medicine in AA prostate cancer patients.
Citation Format: Yusuke Koga, Hanbing Song, Zachary Chalmers, Justin Newberg, Garrett Frampton, Joshua Campbell, Franklin Huang. Similarities and differences between genomic profiles of prostate cancers from African American and European American men with implications for precision cancer medicine [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Twelfth AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2019 Sep 20-23; San Francisco, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2020;29(6 Suppl_2):Abstract nr D120.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yusuke Koga
- 1Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Usa,
| | - Hanbing Song
- 2University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, Usa,
| | | | | | | | | | - Franklin Huang
- 2University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, Usa,
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Thomas A, Mian I, Tlemsani C, Pongor L, Takahashi N, Maignan K, Snider J, Li G, Frampton G, Ali S, Kim S, Nichols S, Rajapakse V, Guha U, Sharon E, Fujimoto J, Moran CA, Wistuba II, Wei JS, Khan J, Szabo E, Torres AZ, Carson KR. Clinical and Genomic Characteristics of Small Cell Lung Cancer in Never Smokers: Results From a Retrospective Multicenter Cohort Study. Chest 2020; 158:1723-1733. [PMID: 32464188 DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.04.068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2019] [Revised: 04/11/2020] [Accepted: 04/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) has the strongest association with smoking among lung cancers. The characteristics of never smokers with SCLC is not known. RESEARCH QUESTION Are the clinical characteristics, prognostic factors, survival, genomic alterations, and tumor mutational burdens of SCLC in patients who have never smoked different from those who have smoked? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS A retrospective multicenter cohort study of patients with clinician-confirmed SCLC was performed with the use of a longitudinal and nationally representative electronic medical records database. Smoking history was assessed through technology-enabled abstraction and confirmed for never smokers via chart review. Genomic characteristics of never smoker patients with SCLC were examined with the use of a next-generation sequencing-based gene panel and whole exome sequencing. RESULTS One hundred of 5,632 patients (1.8%) with SCLC were never smokers. Relative to smokers, never smokers were more likely to be female (66.0% vs 52.4%; P = .009) and present with extensive stage (70.0% vs 62.2%; P = .028). Never smokers had a higher proportion of patients in age groups 35 to 49 years (7.0% vs 3.0%; P = .006) and ≥80 years (17.0% vs 8.2%; P = .006). Known risk factors for lung cancer were found in <20% of never smokers. There were no overall survival differences between never smokers and smokers. Among patients with available genomic data (n = 9), never smoker SCLC were characterized by lower tumor mutational burden, a lower frequency of TP53 mutations, and an absence of mutational signatures related to tobacco exposure. INTERPRETATION The sex- and age-specific distribution of SCLC among never smokers, along with differences that were identified by genomic analyses, suggests a distinct biology of SCLC in never smokers compared with smokers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anish Thomas
- Developmental Therapeutics Branch, Bethesda, MD.
| | - Idrees Mian
- Thoracic and GI Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, Bethesda, MD
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Sehyun Kim
- Developmental Therapeutics Branch, Bethesda, MD
| | | | | | - Udayan Guha
- Thoracic and GI Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, Bethesda, MD
| | - Elad Sharon
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, Bethesda, MD
| | - Junya Fujimoto
- Department of Pathology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas, Houston, TX
| | - Cesar A Moran
- Department of Pathology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas, Houston, TX
| | - Ignacio I Wistuba
- Department of Pathology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas, Houston, TX
| | - Jun S Wei
- Genetics Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Javed Khan
- Genetics Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Eva Szabo
- Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Goodman AM, Castro A, Pyke RM, Okamura R, Kato S, Riviere P, Frampton G, Sokol E, Zhang X, Ball ED, Carter H, Kurzrock R. MHC-I genotype and tumor mutational burden predict response to immunotherapy. Genome Med 2020; 12:45. [PMID: 32430031 PMCID: PMC7236948 DOI: 10.1186/s13073-020-00743-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2019] [Accepted: 05/05/2020] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) with antibodies inhibiting cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated protein-4 (CTLA-4) and programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) (or its ligand (PD-L1)) can stimulate immune responses against cancer and have revolutionized the treatment of tumors. The influence of host germline genetics and its interaction with tumor neoantigens remains poorly defined. We sought to determine the interaction between tumor mutational burden (TMB) and the ability of a patient’s major histocompatibility complex class I (MHC-I) to efficiently present mutated driver neoantigens in predicting response ICB. Methods Comprehensive genomic profiling was performed on 83 patients with diverse cancers treated with ICB to determine TMB and human leukocyte antigen-I (HLA-I) genotype. The ability of a patient’s MHC-I to efficiently present mutated driver neoantigens (defined by the Patient Harmonic-mean Best Rank (PHBR) score (with lower PHBR indicating more efficient presentation)) was calculated for each patient. Results The median progression-free survival (PFS) for PHBR score < 0.5 vs. ≥ 0.5 was 5.1 vs. 4.4 months (P = 0.04). Using a TMB cutoff of 10 mutations/mb, the stable disease > 6 months/partial response/complete response rate, median PFS, and median overall survival (OS) of TMB high/PHBR high vs. TMB high/PHBR low were 43% vs. 78% (P = 0.049), 5.8 vs. 26.8 months (P = 0.03), and 17.2 months vs. not reached (P = 0.23), respectively. These findings were confirmed in an independent validation cohort of 32 patients. Conclusions Poor presentation of driver mutation neoantigens by MHC-I may explain why some tumors (even with a high TMB) do not respond to ICB.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aaron M Goodman
- Division of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA. .,Division of Hematology/Oncology Center for Personalized Cancer Therapy, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA. .,UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center, 855 Health Sciences Drive, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0658, USA.
| | - Andrea Castro
- Division of Medical Genetics, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA.,Bioinformatics and Systems Biology Program, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA.,Health Science, Department of Biomedical Informatics, School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA
| | - Rachel Marty Pyke
- Division of Medical Genetics, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA.,Bioinformatics and Systems Biology Program, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA
| | - Ryosuke Okamura
- Division of Hematology/Oncology Center for Personalized Cancer Therapy, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA
| | - Shumei Kato
- Division of Hematology/Oncology Center for Personalized Cancer Therapy, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA.,UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center, 855 Health Sciences Drive, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0658, USA
| | - Paul Riviere
- Division of Hematology/Oncology Center for Personalized Cancer Therapy, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA
| | | | - Ethan Sokol
- Foundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA, 02141, USA
| | - Xinlian Zhang
- Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA
| | - Edward D Ball
- Division of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA.,UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center, 855 Health Sciences Drive, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0658, USA
| | - Hannah Carter
- Division of Medical Genetics, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA.,Bioinformatics and Systems Biology Program, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA.,CIFAR, MaRS Centre, West Tower, 661 University Ave., Suite 505, Toronto, ON, M5G 1M1, Canada
| | - Razelle Kurzrock
- Division of Hematology/Oncology Center for Personalized Cancer Therapy, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA.,UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center, 855 Health Sciences Drive, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0658, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Klempner SJ, Fabrizio D, Bane S, Reinhart M, Peoples T, Ali SM, Sokol ES, Frampton G, Schrock AB, Anhorn R, Reddy P. Tumor Mutational Burden as a Predictive Biomarker for Response to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Review of Current Evidence. Oncologist 2020; 25:e147-e159. [PMID: 31578273 PMCID: PMC6964127 DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0244] [Citation(s) in RCA: 185] [Impact Index Per Article: 46.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2019] [Accepted: 08/09/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICPIs) extends survival in a proportion of patients across multiple cancers. Tumor mutational burden (TMB)-the number of somatic mutations per DNA megabase (Mb)-has emerged as a proxy for neoantigen burden that is an independent biomarker associated with ICPI outcomes. Based on findings from recent studies, TMB can be reliably estimated using validated algorithms from next-generation sequencing assays that interrogate a sufficiently large subset of the exome as an alternative to whole-exome sequencing. Biological processes contributing to elevated TMB can result from exposure to cigarette smoke and ultraviolet radiation, from deleterious mutations in mismatch repair leading to microsatellite instability, or from mutations in the DNA repair machinery. A variety of clinical studies have shown that patients with higher TMB experience longer survival and greater response rates following treatment with ICPIs compared with those who have lower TMB levels; this includes a prospective randomized clinical trial that found a TMB threshold of ≥10 mutations per Mb to be predictive of longer progression-free survival in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Multiple trials are underway to validate the predictive values of TMB across cancer types and in patients treated with other immunotherapies. Here we review the rationale, algorithm development methodology, and existing clinical data supporting the use of TMB as a predictive biomarker for treatment with ICPIs. We discuss emerging roles for TMB and its potential future value for stratifying patients according to their likelihood of ICPI treatment response. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Tumor mutational burden (TMB) is a newly established independent predictor of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICPI) treatment outcome across multiple tumor types. Certain next-generation sequencing-based techniques allow TMB to be reliably estimated from a subset of the exome without the use of whole-exome sequencing, thus facilitating the adoption of TMB assessment in community oncology settings. Analyses of multiple clinical trials across several cancer types have demonstrated that TMB stratifies patients who are receiving ICPIs by response rate and survival. TMB, alongside other genomic biomarkers, may provide complementary information in selecting patients for ICPI-based therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel J. Klempner
- The Angeles Clinic and Research InstituteLos AngelesCaliforniaUSA
- Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars‐Sinai Medical CenterLos AngelesCaliforniaUSA
| | | | | | | | | | - Siraj M. Ali
- Foundation Medicine, Inc.CambridgeMassachusettsUSA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Negrao M, Skoulidis F, Montesion M, Schulze K, Bara I, Shen V, Hu S, Elamin Y, Le X, Goldberg M, Wu C, Zhang J, Barreto D, Rinsurongkawong W, Simon G, Roth J, Swisher S, Lee J, Tsao A, Papadimitrakopoulou V, Gibbons D, Glisson B, Miller V, Alexander B, Frampton G, Albacker L, Shames D, Zhang J, Heymach J. MA03.05 BRAF Mutations Are Associated with Increased Benefit from PD1/PDL1 Blockade Compared with Other Oncogenic Drivers in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. J Thorac Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2019.08.514] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
|
24
|
Bui NQ, Przybyl J, Trabucco SE, Frampton G, Hastie T, van de Rijn M, Ganjoo KN. A clinico-genomic analysis of soft tissue sarcoma patients reveals CDKN2A deletion as a biomarker for poor prognosis. Clin Sarcoma Res 2019; 9:12. [PMID: 31528332 PMCID: PMC6739971 DOI: 10.1186/s13569-019-0122-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2019] [Accepted: 08/28/2019] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Sarcomas are a rare, heterogeneous group of tumors with variable tendencies for aggressive behavior. Molecular markers for prognosis are needed to risk stratify patients and identify those who might benefit from more intensive therapeutic strategies. Patients and methods We analyzed somatic tumor genomic profiles and clinical outcomes of 152 soft tissue (STS) and bone sarcoma (BS) patients sequenced at Stanford Cancer Institute as well as 206 STS patients from The Cancer Genome Atlas. Genomic profiles of 7733 STS from the Foundation Medicine database were used to assess the frequency of CDKN2A alterations in histological subtypes of sarcoma. Results Compared to all other tumor types, sarcomas were found to carry the highest relative percentage of gene amplifications/deletions/fusions and the lowest average mutation count. The most commonly altered genes in STS were TP53 (47%), CDKN2A (22%), RB1 (22%), NF1 (11%), and ATRX (11%). When all genomic alterations were tested for prognostic significance in the specific Stanford cohort of localized STS, only CDKN2A alterations correlated significantly with prognosis, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 2.83 for overall survival (p = 0.017). These findings were validated in the TCGA dataset where CDKN2A altered patients had significantly worse overall survival with a HR of 2.7 (p = 0.002). Analysis of 7733 STS patients from Foundation One showed high prevalence of CDKN2A alterations in malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors, myxofibrosarcomas, and undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcomas. Conclusion Our clinico-genomic profiling of STS shows that CDKN2A deletion was the most prevalent DNA copy number aberration and was associated with poor prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nam Q Bui
- 1Department of Medicine (Oncology), Stanford University School of Medicine, 875 Blake Wilbur Drive, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
| | - Joanna Przybyl
- 2Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA USA
| | | | | | - Trevor Hastie
- 4Department of Statistics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA USA
| | - Matt van de Rijn
- 2Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA USA
| | - Kristen N Ganjoo
- 1Department of Medicine (Oncology), Stanford University School of Medicine, 875 Blake Wilbur Drive, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Abstract
Abstract
Background. Cancer gene mutations exhibit mutation patterns of prevalence that vary across different ancestry groups. For example, EGFR variants are more frequent in non-small cell lung cancer among people with Asian ancestry, and KRAS variants are observed more frequently in colorectal cancer among patients with African American ancestry. Additionally, many histological subtypes of cancers demonstrate differences in prevalence between people of different ancestry. However, many cancer studies lack the statistical power to identify such nuances. The large cohort of patients who have undergone comprehensive cancer genomic profiling at Foundation Medicine may provide a useful starting point for characterizing these mutation patterns across ancestry groups.
Methods. To establish the ancestry on de-identified samples, we superimposed SNPs targeted by each of our comprehensive genomic profiling tests (FoundationOne, FoundationOne CDx, FoundationOne Heme) with Phase 3 1000 Genomes data. Using an established approach, we projected the SNPs down to the top five principal components and used random forest ensemble learning to train a classifier on each bait set. 10-fold cross-validation indicates this approach performs with 98-99% precision and recall for the different genomic profiling tests.
Results. Ancestry calls were made on over 170,000 de-identified samples consented for research. Initial analyses indicated that classification of American samples was not as robust as other groups. To address this, we trained classifiers on a per-chromosome basis, and re-assigned samples which exhibited less than 80% consensus across chromosomes to an admixture group. Overall prevalence of patient ancestry in the dataset is 75.9% European, 8.3% African, 4.7% East Asian, 0.8% South Asian, and 0.8% American, and 9.5% admixed. From the resulting data, we summarize cancer types that are well-represented across populations, identifying at least 28 tumor types for which we likely have power to identify ancestry-dependent somatic mutations.
Discussion. The dataset described contains a previously unavailable set of cancer types to be mined for ancestry-dependent cancer-driving alterations. Those results will be presented. The ancestry classification approach described in this work can be applied to a range of genomic profiling tests, and refinements on this approach can be integrated into clinical trials and ultimately clinical care to better elucidate varied biologic behavior across advanced cancer.
Citation Format: Justin Newberg, Caitlin Connelly, Garrett Frampton. Determining patient ancestry based on targeted tumor comprehensive genomic profiling [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 1599.
Collapse
|
26
|
Myer P, Lee J, Madison R, Newberg J, Ross J, Chung J, Albacker L, Alexander B, Miller V, Schrock A, Mitchell E, Frampton G, Ali S. Comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) defines the genomic landscape of colorectal cancer (CRC) in individuals of African ancestry. Ann Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdz154.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
27
|
Lieu CH, Golemis EA, Serebriiskii IG, Newberg J, Hemmerich A, Connelly C, Messersmith WA, Eng C, Eckhardt SG, Frampton G, Cooke M, Meyer JE. Comprehensive Genomic Landscapes in Early and Later Onset Colorectal Cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2019; 25:5852-5858. [PMID: 31243121 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-19-0899] [Citation(s) in RCA: 99] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2019] [Revised: 05/03/2019] [Accepted: 06/21/2019] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The incidence rates of colorectal cancers are increasing in young adults. The objective of this study was to investigate genomic differences between tumor samples collected from younger and older patients with colorectal cancer. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN DNA was extracted from 18,218 clinical specimens, followed by hybridization capture of 3,769 exons from 403 cancer-related genes and 47 introns of 19 genes commonly rearranged in cancer. Genomic alterations (GA) were determined, and association with patient age and microsatellite stable/microsatellite instability high (MSS/MSI-H) status established. RESULTS Overall genomic alteration rates in the younger (<40) and older (≥50) cohorts were similar in the majority of the genes analyzed. Gene alteration rates in the microsatellite stable (MSS) younger and older cohorts were largely similar, with several notable differences. In particular, TP53 (FDR < 0.01) and CTNNB1 (FDR = 0.01) alterations were more common in younger patients with colorectal cancer, and APC (FDR < 0.01), KRAS (FDR < 0.01), BRAF (FDR < 0.01), and FAM123B (FDR < 0.01) were more commonly altered in older patients with colorectal cancer. In the MSI-H cohort, the majority of genes showed similar rate of alterations in all age groups, but with significant differences seen in APC (FDR < 0.01), BRAF (FDR < 0.01), and KRAS (FDR < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS Tumors from younger and older patients with colorectal cancer demonstrated similar overall rates of genomic alteration. However, differences were noted in several genes relevant to biology and response to therapy. Further study will need to be conducted to determine whether the differences in gene alteration rates can be leveraged to provide personalized therapies for young patients with early-onset sporadic colorectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher H Lieu
- Division of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, Colorado.
| | - Erica A Golemis
- Program in Molecular Therapeutics, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Ilya G Serebriiskii
- Program in Molecular Therapeutics, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.,Kazan Federal University, Kazan, Russian Federation
| | | | | | | | - Wells A Messersmith
- Division of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Cathy Eng
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - S Gail Eckhardt
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Texas at Austin Dell Medical School and LIVESTRONG Cancer Institutes, Austin, Texas
| | | | | | - Joshua E Meyer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Gay LM, Elvin JA, Vergilio JA, Killian JK, Ramkissoon S, Severson E, Daniel S, Hammerich A, Sokol E, Frampton G, Chung J, Trabucco S, Ali S, Reddy P, Schrock AB, Miller VA, Ross JS. Abstract P3-06-18: Comprehensive genomic profiling of carcinosarcomas of the breast. Cancer Res 2019. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs18-p3-06-18] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background:
Carcinosarcomas of the breast (BCSC) are exceptionally rare and the underlying genomic drivers are still being elucidated. Comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) determines the tumor mutation burden (TMB) and identifies all four classes of genomic alterations (GA) that have potential to direct personalized treatment strategies.
Methods:
CGP by hybridization capture of exons from up to 315 cancer-related genes and select introns of 28 genes commonly rearranged in cancer was applied to ≥ 50ng of DNA extracted from 9 consecutive BCSC and sequenced to high, uniform median coverage (>500X). Tumor mutational burden (TMB) was determined on 1.1 Mbp of sequenced DNA and microsatellite instability (MSI) was determined by principal components analysis of optimized loci.
Results:
The 9 BCSC patients had a median age of 57 yrs (range 49-78 yrs). CGP was performed on the primary BCSC in 4 cases and on metastasis biopsies in 5 cases (4 lung and 1 lymph node). The mean GA/tumor was 6.6 and clinically relevant GA (CRGA)/tumor was 1.3. The most frequent non-CRGA were in TP53 (89%), MYC (56%) and LYN (40%). The most frequent CRGA were in PIK3CA (33%), and NF1, BRCA1, PTEN, RICTOR, FGFR1, AKT2 and STK11 (all at 11%). The median TMB for all BCSC was 2.4 mut/Mb with 1 (11%) tumor with a TMB > 20 mut/Mb and 8 BCSC (88%) with TMB < 5 mut/Mb. Five of 5 BCSC (100%) that were available for MSI status testing were microsatellite stable.
Conclusions:
On CGP, BCSC feature a high frequency of GA, but only a modest frequency of CRGA and high TMB. However, when the CRGA and TMB positive cases are combined (77.8% overall in this series), the opportunity for personalized targeted and immunotherapies are significant. Thus, further investigation of precision therapies for BCSC in the clinical trial setting appear warranted.
Citation Format: Gay LM, Elvin JA, Vergilio J-A, Killian JK, Ramkissoon S, Severson E, Daniel S, Hammerich A, Sokol E, Frampton G, Chung J, Trabucco S, Ali S, Reddy P, Schrock AB, Miller VA, Ross JS. Comprehensive genomic profiling of carcinosarcomas of the breast [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-06-18.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- LM Gay
- Foundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, MA; Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY
| | - JA Elvin
- Foundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, MA; Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY
| | - J-A Vergilio
- Foundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, MA; Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY
| | - JK Killian
- Foundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, MA; Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY
| | - S Ramkissoon
- Foundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, MA; Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY
| | - E Severson
- Foundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, MA; Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY
| | - S Daniel
- Foundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, MA; Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY
| | - A Hammerich
- Foundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, MA; Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY
| | - E Sokol
- Foundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, MA; Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY
| | - G Frampton
- Foundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, MA; Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY
| | - J Chung
- Foundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, MA; Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY
| | - S Trabucco
- Foundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, MA; Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY
| | - S Ali
- Foundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, MA; Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY
| | - P Reddy
- Foundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, MA; Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY
| | - AB Schrock
- Foundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, MA; Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY
| | - VA Miller
- Foundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, MA; Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY
| | - JS Ross
- Foundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, MA; Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Sigal DS, Bhangoo MS, Hermel JA, Pavlick DC, Frampton G, Miller VA, Ross JS, Ali SM. Comprehensive genomic profiling identifies novel NTRK fusions in neuroendocrine tumors. Oncotarget 2018; 9:35809-35812. [PMID: 30533196 PMCID: PMC6254675 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.26260] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2018] [Accepted: 10/06/2018] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
CGP results from >60,000 cases were screened to identify NTRK fusion events from cases of neuroendocrine tumors. 2417 NET patients from diverse anatomic sites were identified. From this dataset, six cases harbored NTRK fusions which included intra- and inter-chromosomal translocations. A NTRK fusion frequency of approximately 0.3% was found across all subtypes of NETs. Three cases involved translocations of NTRK1 with unique fusion partners (GPATCH4, PIP5K1A, CCDC19). Co-occurring alterations occurred in five cases. NTRK alterations were identified in nearly the full spectrum of NETs, including from the small intestine, pancreas, lung, and others. With the late stage clinical development of NTRK TKIs (including entrectinib and larotrectinib), these findings may further inform targeted approaches to therapy in NET.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Darren S. Sigal
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Scripps Clinic Medical Group, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Munveer S. Bhangoo
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Scripps Clinic Medical Group, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Jonathan A. Hermel
- Department of Graduate Medical Education, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Mian I, Nichols S, Abernethy A, Carson K, Maignon K, Torres A, Snider J, Frampton G, Li G, Sharon E, Szabo E, Thomas A. P1.12-15 Distinctive Clinical Characteristics of SCLC in Never-Smokers. J Thorac Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2018.08.850] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
|
31
|
Schrock A, Pavlick D, Rosenzweig M, Erlich R, Albacker L, Frampton G, Ross J, Miller V, Ali S, Ou S. MA16.05 MET Kinase Domain Rearrangements (KDRE) in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Identified Through Comprehensive Genomic Profiling (CGP). J Thorac Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2018.08.451] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
|
32
|
Ruder D, Papadimitrakopoulou V, Shien K, Behrens C, Kalhor N, Chen H, Shen L, Lee JJ, Hong WK, Tang X, Girard L, Minna JD, Diao L, Wang J, Mino B, Villalobos P, Rodriguez-Canales J, Hanson NE, Sun J, Miller V, Greenbowe J, Frampton G, Herbst RS, Baladandayuthapani V, Wistuba II, Izzo JG. Concomitant targeting of the mTOR/MAPK pathways: novel therapeutic strategy in subsets of RICTOR/KRAS-altered non-small cell lung cancer. Oncotarget 2018; 9:33995-34008. [PMID: 30338041 PMCID: PMC6188056 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.26129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2018] [Accepted: 09/09/2018] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Despite a therapeutic paradigm shift into targeted-driven medicinal approaches, resistance to therapy remains a hallmark of lung cancer, driven by biological and molecular diversity. Using genomic and expression data from advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients enrolled in the BATTLE-2 clinical trial, we identified RICTOR alterations in a subset of lung adenocarcinomas and found RICTOR expression to carry worse overall survival. RICTOR-altered cohort was significantly enriched in KRAS/MAPK axis mutations, suggesting a co-oncogenic driver role in these molecular settings. Using NSCLC cell lines, we showed that, distinctly in KRAS mutant backgrounds, RICTOR blockade impairs malignant properties and generates a compensatory enhanced activation of the MAPK pathway, exposing a unique therapeutic vulnerability. In vitro and in vivo concomitant pharmacologic inhibition of mTORC1/2 and MEK1/2 resulted in synergistic responses of anti-tumor effects. Our study provides evidence of a distinctive therapeutic opportunity in a subset of NSCLC carrying concomitant RICTOR/KRAS alterations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dennis Ruder
- Graduate Program in Human and Molecular Genetics and Cancer Biology, MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, Texas, USA.,Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Vassiliki Papadimitrakopoulou
- Department of Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Kazuhiko Shien
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Carmen Behrens
- Department of Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Neda Kalhor
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Huiqin Chen
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Li Shen
- Department of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - J Jack Lee
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Waun Ki Hong
- Department of Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Ximing Tang
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Luc Girard
- Hamon Center for Therapeutic Oncology Research, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - John D Minna
- Hamon Center for Therapeutic Oncology Research, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Lixia Diao
- Department of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Jing Wang
- Department of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Barbara Mino
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Pamela Villalobos
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Jaime Rodriguez-Canales
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Nana E Hanson
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - James Sun
- Foundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Vincent Miller
- Foundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Joel Greenbowe
- Foundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | - Roy S Herbst
- Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Veera Baladandayuthapani
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Ignacio I Wistuba
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Julie G Izzo
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Goodman AM, Piccioni D, Kato S, Boichard A, Wang HY, Frampton G, Lippman SM, Connelly C, Fabrizio D, Miller V, Sicklick JK, Kurzrock R. Prevalence of PDL1 Amplification and Preliminary Response to Immune Checkpoint Blockade in Solid Tumors. JAMA Oncol 2018; 4:1237-1244. [PMID: 29902298 PMCID: PMC6139049 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.1701] [Citation(s) in RCA: 189] [Impact Index Per Article: 31.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2018] [Accepted: 03/29/2018] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Importance Copy number alterations in programmed cell death ligand 1 (PDL1 or CD274), programmed cell death 1 ligand 2 (PDCD1LG2 or PDL2), and Janus kinase 2 (JAK2) genes (chromosome 9p24.1) characterize Hodgkin lymphoma, resulting in high response rates to programmed cell death 1 (PD-1)/programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) blockade. The prevalence and utility of PDL1 amplification as a response biomarker to PD-1/PD-L1 blockade are unknown in other tumors. Objectives To examine the prevalence of PDL1 amplification and its utility as a response biomarker to PD-1/PD-L1 blockade in solid tumors. Design, Setting, and Participants This retrospective study (October 1, 2012, to October 1, 2017) used a deidentified tumor database from a commercial company and annotated clinical records from a subset of patients treated at a university tertiary referral center. The study analyzed 118 187 tumors from the deidentified database, including a clinically annotated subgroup of 2039 malignant tumors. Interventions Comprehensive genomic profiling was performed on all samples to determine PDL1 amplification, microsatellite instability, and tumor mutational burden (TMB). A subset of patients was treated with PD-1/PD-L1 blockade. Main Outcomes and Measures The prevalence of PDL1 amplification was determined among 118 187 patient samples that underwent next-generation sequencing. Solid tumors treated with checkpoint blockade were evaluated for response and progression-free survival (PFS). Results Of the 118 187 deidentified tumor samples, PDL1 amplifications were identified in 843 (0.7%), including more than 100 types of solid tumors. Most PDL1-amplified tumors (84.8%) had a low to intermediate TMB. PDL1 amplification did not always correlate with high-positive PD-L1 expression by immunohistochemical analysis. Six of 9 patients (66.7%) from 1 center with PDL1-amplified solid tumors had objective responses after checkpoint blockade administration. The median PFS among all treated patients was 15.2 months. Responders included 1 patient with glioblastoma (PFS, ≥5.2 months), 2 patients with head and neck squamous cell cancer (PFS, ≥9 and 15.2 months), 2 patients with metastatic basal cell cancer (PFS, 3.8 and ≥24.1 months), and 1 patient with urothelial cancer (PFS, ≥17.8 months). Conclusions and Relevance The results of this study suggest that PDL1 amplification occurs in a small subset of malignant tumors. Additional large-scale, prospective studies of PDL1-amplified cancers are warranted to confirm the responses to checkpoint blockade described herein, even in the absence of microsatellite instability, high PD-L1 expression, and a high TMB.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aaron M. Goodman
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla
- Moores Center for Personalized Cancer Therapy, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla
- Division of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla
| | - David Piccioni
- Division of Neurological Oncology, Department of Neurology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla
| | - Shumei Kato
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla
- Moores Center for Personalized Cancer Therapy, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla
| | - Amélie Boichard
- Moores Center for Personalized Cancer Therapy, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla
| | - Huan-You Wang
- Department of Pathology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla
| | | | - Scott M. Lippman
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla
- Moores Center for Personalized Cancer Therapy, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla
| | | | | | | | - Jason K. Sicklick
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla
| | - Razelle Kurzrock
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla
- Moores Center for Personalized Cancer Therapy, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Fabrizio DA, George TJ, Dunne RF, Frampton G, Sun J, Gowen K, Kennedy M, Greenbowe J, Schrock AB, Hezel AF, Ross JS, Stephens PJ, Ali SM, Miller VA, Fakih M, Klempner SJ. Beyond microsatellite testing: assessment of tumor mutational burden identifies subsets of colorectal cancer who may respond to immune checkpoint inhibition. J Gastrointest Oncol 2018; 9:610-617. [PMID: 30151257 DOI: 10.21037/jgo.2018.05.06] [Citation(s) in RCA: 168] [Impact Index Per Article: 28.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The clinical application of PD1/PD-L1 targeting checkpoint inhibitors in colorectal cancer (CRC) has largely focused on a subset of microsatellite instable (MSI-high) patients. However, the proposed genotype that sensitizes these patients to immunotherapy is not captured by MSI status alone. Estimation of tumor mutational burden (TMB) from comprehensive genomic profiling is validated against whole exome sequencing and linked to checkpoint response in metastatic melanoma, urothelial bladder cancer and non-small cell lung carcinoma. We sought to explore the subset of microsatellite stable (MSS) CRC patients with high TMB, and identify the specific genomic signatures associated with this phenotype. Furthermore, we explore the ability to quantify TMB as a potential predictive biomarker of PD1/PD-L1 therapy in CRC. Methods Formalin-fixed, paraffin embedded tissue sections from 6,004 cases of CRC were sequenced with a CLIA-approved CGP assay. MSI and TMB statuses were computationally determined using validated methods. The cutoff for TMB-high was defined according to the lower bound value that satisfied the 90% probability interval based on the TMB distribution across all MSI-High patients. Results MSS tumors were observed in 5,702 of 6,004 (95.0%) cases and MSI-H tumors were observed in 302 (5.0%) cases. All but one (99.7%) MSI-H cases were TMB-high (range, 6.3-746.9 mut/Mb) and 5,538 of 5,702 (97.0%) MSS cases were TMB-low (range, 0.0-10.8 mut/Mb). Consequently, 164 of 5,702 (2.9%) MSS cases were confirmed as TMB-high (range, 11.7-707.2 mut/Mb), representing an increase in the target population that may respond to checkpoint inhibitor therapy by 54% (466 vs. 302, respectively). Response to PD-1 inhibitor is demonstrated in MSS/TMB-high cases. Conclusions Concurrent TMB assessment accurately classifies MSI tumors as TMB-high and simultaneously identifies nearly 3% or CRC as MSS/TMB-high. This subgroup may expand the population of CRC who may benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitor based therapeutic approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Thomas J George
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, University of Florida Health Cancer Center, Gainseville, USA
| | - Richard F Dunne
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, USA
| | | | - James Sun
- Foundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, USA
| | - Kyle Gowen
- Foundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, USA
| | | | | | | | - Aram F Hezel
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, USA
| | - Jeffrey S Ross
- Foundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, USA.,Department of Pathology, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA
| | | | | | | | - Marwan Fakih
- Department of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA USA
| | - Samuel J Klempner
- The Angeles Clinic and Research Institute, Los Angeles, USA.,Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Ofir Dovrat T, Sokol E, Frampton G, Shachar E, Pelles S, Geva R, Wolf I. Unusually long-term responses to vemurafenib in BRAF V600E mutated colon and thyroid cancers followed by the development of rare RAS activating mutations. Cancer Biol Ther 2018; 19:871-874. [PMID: 30036146 DOI: 10.1080/15384047.2018.1480289] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION V600E BRAF mutation is an established driver mutation in a variety of tumors. Vemurafenib is a selective inhibitor of the BRAF V600E kinase, known to be highly effective in BRAF V600E-positive metastatic melanoma. As a single agent, vemurafenib is relatively ineffective in other V600E-positive malignancies. Case 1: A 72 year old man with metastatic CRC who failed several previous lines of chemotherapy. Genetic analysis of 315 cancer-related genes (Foundation Medicine, FMI) revealed a BRAF V600E mutation. The patient was treated with vemurafenib resulting in a partial response of 18 months. Genetic analysis following development of resistance revealed a new mutation in KRAS-G12R. Case 2: V600E mutation was identified in a 59 year old woman with metastatic PTC refractory to radioiodine therapy. The patient was treated with vemurafenib resulting in a partial response lasting 43 months. Genetic analysis following development of resistance revealed a new mutation in NRAS-Q61K. The presented cases demonstrated the development of rare RAS mutations as a genetic mechanism of acquired BRAF inhibitor resistance. This observation is strongly supported by the analysis of a large database consisting of 712 BRAF V600E-positive melanoma samples showing higher rates of BRAF V600E and RAS mutations co-occurrence in metastatic lesions compared to local tumors (OR = 3.8, p = 0.035). This enrichment is likely a result of the development of RAS mutations following treatment with BRAF inhibitors. DISCUSSION We report two cases showing extreme response to vemurafenib, which could not be predicted prior to treatment commencement. Genetic testing demonstrated a resistant mechanism not previously reported in CRC or PTC patients, namely an acquired mutation of RAS. This is supported by an analysis of a large cohort of BRAF V600E-positive melanomas. Further studies are needed in order to identify predictive markers for response to vemurafenib and to explore novel strategies to overcome RAS-mediated resistance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tali Ofir Dovrat
- a Institute of Oncology , Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center , Tel Aviv , Israel
| | - Ethan Sokol
- b Foundation Medicine , Cancer Genomics Research Group , Cambridge , MA , USA
| | - Garrett Frampton
- b Foundation Medicine , Cancer Genomics Research Group , Cambridge , MA , USA
| | - Eliya Shachar
- a Institute of Oncology , Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center , Tel Aviv , Israel
| | - Sharon Pelles
- a Institute of Oncology , Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center , Tel Aviv , Israel
| | - Ravit Geva
- a Institute of Oncology , Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center , Tel Aviv , Israel.,c Sackler Faculty of Medicine , Tel Aviv University , Tel Aviv , Israel
| | - Ido Wolf
- a Institute of Oncology , Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center , Tel Aviv , Israel.,c Sackler Faculty of Medicine , Tel Aviv University , Tel Aviv , Israel
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Singal G, Li G, Agarwala V, Kaushik G, O'Connell C, Cobb GA, Caron T, Bourque D, Guria A, Frank S, Frampton G, Carson K, Abernethy A, Miller VA. Abstract 1833: Identification of resistance mechanisms to EGFR treatment in the real world using a clinicogenomic database. Cancer Res 2018. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2018-1833] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction
Use of targeted therapies often results in resistance mediated by genomic evolution, but discovery of these mechanisms has historically been opportunistic. A more scalable approach is needed to uncover resistance mechanisms from real world patient experience.
Methods
A real-world clinicogenomic database (CGDB) was created of patients with NSCLC who received Foundation Medicine's FoundationOne next generation sequencing (NGS) assay as part of routine care, for whom electronic health record (EHR) data was available in the Flatiron Health Database. Data from NGS testing and the EHR were linked through a HIPAA compliant de-identification and linking process (Singal et al, ASCO 2017). Patients who received first and second generation EGFR inhibitors (afatinib, cetuximab, erlotinib, gefitinib, lapatinib) were segmented into those undergoing NGS testing before treatment (“pre-treatment cohort”) and those biopsied at least 3 months after treatment start (“post-treatment cohort”). All tumor samples were from different patients; paired samples were not available. The prevalence of EGFR and non-EGFR alterations in pre- vs post-treatment cohorts were compared using Fisher's exact test.
Results
The NSCLC cohort included 2139 patients, of whom 370 were treated with EGFR inhibitors (NGS testing pre-treatment cohort n=237, post-treatment cohort n=133). Of 51 distinct EGFR short variants identified, only T790M was significantly enriched in the post-treatment cohort (3.4% pre-treatment vs 32.3% post-treatment, p < 0.0001). Analysis of non-EGFR genes demonstrated significant post-treatment enrichment of amplifications in both AKT2 (0.84% vs 7.5%, p=0.001) and FGF10 (1.3% vs 6.0%, p=0.02). These findings may represent resistance mechanisms, concordant with prior literature (Lin et al., AJCR 2014). Conversely, the frequency of ERBB2 short variants was significantly lower in the post-treatment cohort (7.2% vs 0%, p=0.0005).
Conclusion
Population-based analyses of a scalable, real-world clinicogenomic database, derived from data generated as part of routine patient care, can recapitulate known and previously hypothesized mechanisms of resistance to EGFR inhibitors. Extension of this approach with increasing sample size and longitudinal follow-up over time may elucidate novel mechanisms of resistance to a broad array of cancer therapies.
Citation Format: Gaurav Singal, Gerald Li, Vineeta Agarwala, Gaurav Kaushik, Claire O'Connell, Garrett A. Cobb, Thomas Caron, David Bourque, Ameet Guria, Shannon Frank, Garrett Frampton, Ken Carson, Amy Abernethy, Vincent A. Miller. Identification of resistance mechanisms to EGFR treatment in the real world using a clinicogenomic database [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 1833.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Gerald Li
- 1Foundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, MA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Ross JS, Gay LM, Wang K, Vergilio JA, Suh J, Ramkissoon S, Somerset H, Johnson JM, Russell J, Ali S, Schrock AB, Fabrizio D, Frampton G, Miller V, Stephens PJ, Elvin JA, Bowles DW. Comprehensive genomic profiles of metastatic and relapsed salivary gland carcinomas are associated with tumor type and reveal new routes to targeted therapies. Ann Oncol 2018; 28:2539-2546. [PMID: 28961851 PMCID: PMC5834110 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdx399] [Citation(s) in RCA: 72] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Relapsed/metastatic salivary gland carcinomas (SGCs) have a wide diversity of histologic subtypes associated with variable clinical aggressiveness and response to local and systemic therapies. We queried whether comprehensive genomic profiling could define the tumor subtypes and uncover clinically relevant genomic alterations, revealing new routes to targeted therapies for patients with relapsed and metastatic disease. Patients and methods From a series of 85 686 clinical cases, DNA was extracted from 40 µm of formalin-fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) sections for 623 consecutive SGC. CGP was carried out on hybridization-captured, adaptor ligation-based libraries (mean coverage depth, >500×) for up to 315 cancer-related genes. Tumor mutational burden was determined on 1.1 Mb of sequenced DNA. All classes of alterations, base substitutions, short insertions/deletions, copy number changes, and rearrangements/fusions were determined simultaneously. Results The clinically more indolent SGC including adenoid cystic carcinoma, acinic cell carcinoma, polymorphous low-grade adenocarcinoma, mammary analog secretory carcinoma, and epithelial-myoepithelial carcinomas have significantly fewer genomic alterations, TP53 mutations, and lower tumor mutational burden than the typically more aggressive SGCs including mucoepidermoid carcinoma, salivary duct carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, not otherwise specified, carcinoma NOS, and carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma. The more aggressive SGCs are commonly driven by ERBB2 PI3K pathway genomic alterations. Additional targetable GAs are frequently seen. Conclusions Genomic profiling of SGCs demonstrates important differences between traditionally indolent and aggressive cancers. These differences may provide therapeutic options in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J S Ross
- Department of Pathology, Foundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge; Department of Pathology, Albany Medical Center, Albany, USA.
| | - L M Gay
- Department of Pathology, Foundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge
| | - K Wang
- Center for Precision Medicine, Zhejiang University International Hospital, Hangzhou, China
| | - J A Vergilio
- Department of Pathology, Foundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge
| | - J Suh
- Department of Pathology, Foundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge
| | - S Ramkissoon
- Department of Pathology, Foundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge
| | - H Somerset
- Department of Pathology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora
| | - J M Johnson
- Department of Medical Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia
| | - J Russell
- Medical Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa
| | | | | | - D Fabrizio
- Clinical Genomics, Foundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge
| | - G Frampton
- Clinical Genomics, Foundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge
| | | | - P J Stephens
- Clinical Genomics, Foundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge
| | - J A Elvin
- Department of Pathology, Foundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge
| | - D W Bowles
- Division of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, USA. mailto:
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Ikpeazu C, Elvin J, Vergilio J, Suh J, Ramkissoon S, Wang K, Bowles D, Somerset H, Russell J, Ali S, Schrock A, Fabrizio D, Frampton G, Miller V, Stephens P, Gay L, Ross J. Comprehensive Genomic Profiling and Precision Pathology for Clinically Advanced Salivary Gland Myoepithelial Carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.12.186] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
39
|
Ross JS, Fakih M, Ali SM, Elvin JA, Schrock AB, Suh J, Vergilio J, Ramkissoon S, Severson E, Daniel S, Fabrizio D, Frampton G, Sun J, Miller VA, Stephens PJ, Gay LM. Targeting HER2 in colorectal cancer: The landscape of amplification and short variant mutations in ERBB2 and ERBB3. Cancer 2018; 124:1358-1373. [PMID: 29338072 PMCID: PMC5900732 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.31125] [Citation(s) in RCA: 124] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2017] [Revised: 09/28/2017] [Accepted: 10/06/2017] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In contrast to lung cancer, few precision treatments are available for colorectal cancer (CRC). One rapidly emerging treatment target in CRC is ERBB2 (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 [HER2]). Oncogenic alterations in HER2, or its dimerization partner HER3, can underlie sensitivity to HER2-targeted therapies. METHODS In this study, 8887 CRC cases were evaluated by comprehensive genomic profiling for genomic alterations in 315 cancer-related genes, tumor mutational burden, and microsatellite instability. This cohort included both colonic (7599 cases; 85.5%) and rectal (1288 cases; 14.5%) adenocarcinomas. RESULTS A total of 569 mCRCs were positive for ERBB2 (429 cases; 4.8%) and/or ERBB3 (148 cases; 1.7%) and featured ERBB amplification, short variant alterations, or a combination of the 2. High tumor mutational burden (≥20 mutations/Mb) was significantly more common in ERBB-mutated samples, and ERBB3-mutated CRCs were significantly more likely to have high microsatellite instability (P<.002). Alterations affecting KRAS (27.3%) were significantly underrepresented in ERBB2-amplified samples compared with wild-type CRC samples (51.8%), and ERBB2- or ERBB3-mutated samples (49.0% and 60.8%, respectively) (P<.01). Other significant differences in mutation frequency were observed for genes in the PI3K/MTOR and mismatch repair pathways. CONCLUSIONS Although observed less often than in breast or upper gastrointestinal carcinomas, indications for which anti-HER2 therapies are approved, the percentage of CRC with ERBB genomic alterations is significant. Importantly, 32% of ERBB2-positive CRCs harbor short variant alterations that are undetectable by routine immunohistochemistry or fluorescence in situ hybridization testing. The success of anti-HER2 therapies in ongoing clinical trials is a promising development for patients with CRC. Cancer 2018;124:1358-73. © 2018 Foundation Medicine, Inc. Cancer published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Cancer Society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey S. Ross
- Foundation Medicine IncCambridgeMassachusetts
- Department of PathologyAlbany Medical CenterAlbanyNew York
| | - Marwan Fakih
- Department of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research City of HopeDuarteCalifornia
| | | | | | | | - James Suh
- Foundation Medicine IncCambridgeMassachusetts
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - James Sun
- Foundation Medicine IncCambridgeMassachusetts
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Severson EAA, Riedlinger GM, Goldfinger M, Connelly C, Ramkissoon S, Frampton G, Ross J, Miller V, Vergilio JA, Elvin J, Hadigol M, Hirshfield KM, Rodriguez-Rodriguez L, Ganesan S, Khiabanian H. Abstract LB-B02: Detection of Clonal Hematopoiesis of Indeterminate Potential in Solid Tumors: Implications for Interpretation of Molecular Testing. Mol Cancer Ther 2018. [DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.targ-17-lb-b02] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP) is caused by the expansion of hematopoietic stem cells that harbor oncogenic mutations. CHIP is associated with older age and increased mortality, and has been detected in a substantial percentage of the normal peripheral blood of cancer patients. Here, we hypothesize that CHIP may also be detected in solid tumor sequencing assays due to the presence of admixed hematopoietic cells; some mutations present in these data, especially those present at lower mutation allele frequency (MAF) relative to the tumor major clone, may signal the presence of CHIP rather than alterations in the solid tumor, and directly impact diagnosis, treatment, and patient prognosis.
Comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP), even without matched normal DNA, provides an unbiased view of both heterogeneous solid tumor cells and admixed non-tumor populations. CGP using the FoundationOne® and FoundationOne®Heme platforms was used to profile 97,670 solid tumors, with 257 shared genes interrogated via DNA-seq by both assays. These tumors were categorized into 23 cancer types. Logistic regression was used to evaluate the relationship between genomic alterations and patient age. The probability that each mutation’s MAF was significantly less than expected from tumor purity was calculated. CHIP-associated mutations were defined as those in the NCCN guidelines for Myelodysplastic Syndrome or previously detected CHIP in healthy individuals.
CHIP-associated alterations should correlate with increasing age regardless of tumor type. Therefore, the log odds ratio of alteration rate for each disease group and gene combination before and after age 60 was calculated. After correction for multiple
hypotheses, only DNMT3A, TET2, SF3B1, and ASXL1 had significantly more alterations after age 60 across all disease groups (p <0.05). Concordantly, the rates of mutations within DNMT3A, TET2, SF3B1, and ASXL1 were strongly correlated with increasing patient age (DNMT3A p = 9.1E-75;TET2 p = 1.8E-109; SF3B1 p = 3.4E-47; ASXL1 p = 1.9E-41). Moreover, mutations in these genes were detected at decreased MAFs in patients older than 60 years (DNMT3A p <1.3E-6; TET2 p <3.1E-15; ASXL1 p <6.1E-7; SF3B1 p <2.7E-13).
To validate that these mutations existed in non-tumor elements, CGP of 1,636 solid tumors treated at Rutgers were analyzed; 36 patients had TET2 and DNMT3A mutations at MAFs significantly below the expected (p <0.05). The median age of these patients was 68 years; 53% of them had a history of smoking, and 58% had chemotherapy and/or radiation prior to CGP. Matched peripheral blood samples were available for 13 patients; microdissected lymphocytes from a lymph node biopsy without histologic evidence of tumor were available for another patient. When these hematopoietic samples were sequenced, 11 out of 14 (79%) had the same TET2 or DNMT3A mutation found in the solid tumor. For the other three patients, the mutations were detected exclusively in microdissected tumor cells enriched from the original samples.
Overall, our analysis provides compelling evidence that when CHIP-associated mutations are observed in high-depth CGP of solid tumor samples at MAFs significantly different than expected, caution is necessary for appropriate patient management, and a hematologic workup should be considered in the appropriate clinical context.
Citation Format: Eric A. A. Severson, Gregory M. Riedlinger, Mendel Goldfinger, Caitlin Connelly, Shakti Ramkissoon, Garrett Frampton, Jeffrey Ross, Vincent Miller, Jo-Anne Vergilio, Julia Elvin, Mohammad Hadigol, Kim M. Hirshfield, Lorna Rodriguez-Rodriguez, Shridar Ganesan, Hossein Khiabanian. Detection of Clonal Hematopoiesis of Indeterminate Potential in Solid Tumors: Implications for Interpretation of Molecular Testing [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC International Conference: Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2017 Oct 26-30; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2018;17(1 Suppl):Abstract nr LB-B02.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Mendel Goldfinger
- 2Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers University, New Brunsiwck, NJ
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Mohammad Hadigol
- 2Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers University, New Brunsiwck, NJ
| | - Kim M. Hirshfield
- 2Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers University, New Brunsiwck, NJ
| | | | - Shridar Ganesan
- 2Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers University, New Brunsiwck, NJ
| | - Hossein Khiabanian
- 2Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers University, New Brunsiwck, NJ
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Goodman AM, Kato S, Cohen PR, Boichard A, Frampton G, Miller V, Stephens PJ, Daniels GA, Kurzrock R. Genomic landscape of advanced basal cell carcinoma: Implications for precision treatment with targeted and immune therapies. Oncoimmunology 2017; 7:e1404217. [PMID: 29399405 PMCID: PMC5790366 DOI: 10.1080/2162402x.2017.1404217] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2017] [Revised: 11/06/2017] [Accepted: 11/08/2017] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Metastatic basal cell cancer (BCC) is an ultra-rare malignancy with no approved therapies beyond Hedgehog inhibitors. We characterized the genomics, tumor mutational burden (TMB), and anti-PD-1 therapy responses in patients with locally advanced or metastatic BCC. Overall, 2,039 diverse cancer samples that had undergone comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) were reviewed. Eight patients with locally advanced/metastatic BCC were identified (two had two CGP analyses; total, 10 biopsies). Two tumors demonstrated PD-L1 amplification. Seven patients had >1 actionable alteration. The TMB (mutations/mb) (median (range)) was 90 (3-103) for the BCCs versus 4 (1-860) for 1637 cancers other than BCC (P < 0.0001). Median progression-free survival (PFS) for all four patients treated with PD-1 blockade was 10.7 months (range, 3.8 to 17.6+ months); three patients had an objective response. In conclusion, advanced/metastatic BCC often has biological features (high TMB; PD-L1 amplification) predictive of immunotherapy benefit, and patients frequently respond to PD-1 blockade.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aaron M. Goodman
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
- Center for Personalized Cancer Therapy, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
- Department of Medicine, Division of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Shumei Kato
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
- Center for Personalized Cancer Therapy, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Philip R. Cohen
- Department of Dermatology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Amélie Boichard
- Center for Personalized Cancer Therapy, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | | | | | | | - Gregory A. Daniels
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Razelle Kurzrock
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
- Center for Personalized Cancer Therapy, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Lee H, El Jabbour T, Ainechi S, Gay LM, Elvin JA, Vergilio JA, Suh J, Ramkissoon SH, Ali SM, Schrock A, Fabrizio D, Frampton G, Nazeer T, Miller VA, Stephens PJ, Ross JS. General paucity of genomic alteration and low tumor mutation burden in refractory and metastatic hepatoblastoma: comprehensive genomic profiling study. Hum Pathol 2017; 70:84-91. [DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2017.10.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2017] [Revised: 09/29/2017] [Accepted: 10/11/2017] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
43
|
Ramkissoon S, Albacker L, Severson E, Connelly C, Johnson A, Gay L, Vergilio JA, Elvin J, Suh J, Daniel S, Brown C, Covert M, Schrock A, Frampton G, Ali S, Stephens P, Miller V, Ross J. PATH-38. COMPREHENSIVE GENOMIC PROFILING OF OLIGODENDROGLIOMAS REFINES TUMOR DIAGNOSES AND IDENTIFIES PATIENTS FOR TARGETED THERAPIES AND IMMUNE CHECKPOINT INHIBITORS. Neuro Oncol 2017. [DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/nox168.728] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
|
44
|
Suh J, Severson E, Hechtman J, Frampton G, Fabrizio D, Sun J, Ali S, Gu P, Klempner S, Miller V, Stephens P, Ross J. Hybrid-capture based comprehensive genomic profiling of hepatocellular carcinoma identifies patients who may benefit from targeted therapies and immune checkpoint blockade. Ann Oncol 2017. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdx660.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
45
|
Ross JS, Ali SM, Fasan O, Block J, Pal S, Elvin JA, Schrock AB, Suh J, Nozad S, Kim S, Jeong Lee H, Sheehan CE, Jones DM, Vergilio JA, Ramkissoon S, Severson E, Daniel S, Fabrizio D, Frampton G, Miller VA, Stephens PJ, Gay LM. ALK Fusions in a Wide Variety of Tumor Types Respond to Anti-ALK Targeted Therapy. Oncologist 2017; 22:1444-1450. [PMID: 29079636 DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2016-0488] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2017] [Accepted: 07/18/2017] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Genomic fusions of the anaplastic lymphoma kinase gene (ALK) are a well-established therapy target in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). From a survey of 114,200 clinical cases, we determined the prevalence of ALK rearrangements (rALK) in non-NSCLC tumors and report their responsiveness to therapies targeting ALK. MATERIALS AND METHODS Comprehensive genomic profiling of 114,200 relapsed and metastatic malignancies, including both solid tumors and hematolymphoid cancers, was performed using a hybrid-capture, adaptor ligation-based next-generation sequencing assay. RESULTS Of 114,200 clinical samples, 21,522 (18.8%) were NSCLC and 92,678 (81.2%) were other tumor types. Of the 876 (0.8%) cases with ALK fusions (fALK) or rALK, 675 (77.1%) were NSCLC and 201 (22.9%) were other tumor types. ALK fusions were significantly more frequent in NSCLC (3.1%) than non-NSCLC (0.2%; p < .0001). Patients with non-NSCLC tumors harboring fALK were significantly younger (p < .0001) and more often female (p < .0001) than patients with fALK-positive NSCLC. EML4 was more often the fusion partner in NSCLC (83.5%) versus non-NSCLC tumors (30.9%; p < .0001). CONCLUSION ALK rearrangements can be identified in a wide variety of epithelial and mesenchymal malignancies beyond NSCLC. Anti-ALK therapies can be effective in non-NSCLC tumors driven by fALK, and further study of therapies targeting ALK in clinical trials involving a wider variety of cancer types appears warranted. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Rearrangements involving the ALK gene have been detected in dozens of cancer types using next-generation sequencing. Patients whose tumors harbor ALK rearrangements or fusions respond to treatment with crizotinib and alectinib, including tumors not normally associated with ALK mutations, such as non-Langerhans cell histiocytosis or renal cell carcinoma. Comprehensive genomic profiling using next-generation sequencing can detect targetable ALK fusions irrespective of tumor type or fusions partner.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey S Ross
- Foundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
- Albany Medical Center, Albany, New York, USA
| | - Siraj M Ali
- Foundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Omotayo Fasan
- Geisinger Health System, Danville, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Jared Block
- Carolinas HealthCare, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA
| | | | - Julia A Elvin
- Foundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | - James Suh
- Foundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Sahar Nozad
- Albany Medical Center, Albany, New York, USA
| | - Sungeun Kim
- Albany Medical Center, Albany, New York, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Eric Severson
- Foundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | - David Fabrizio
- Foundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | - Vince A Miller
- Foundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | - Laurie M Gay
- Foundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Goetz MP, Suman VJ, Reid JM, Northfelt DW, Mahr MA, Ralya AT, Kuffel M, Buhrow SA, Safgren SL, McGovern RM, Black J, Dockter T, Haddad T, Erlichman C, Adjei AA, Visscher D, Chalmers ZR, Frampton G, Kipp BR, Liu MC, Hawse JR, Doroshow JH, Collins JM, Streicher H, Ames MM, Ingle JN. First-in-Human Phase I Study of the Tamoxifen Metabolite Z-Endoxifen in Women With Endocrine-Refractory Metastatic Breast Cancer. J Clin Oncol 2017; 35:3391-3400. [PMID: 28854070 PMCID: PMC5648176 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2017.73.3246] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Endoxifen is a tamoxifen metabolite with potent antiestrogenic activity. Patients and Methods We performed a phase I study of oral Z-endoxifen to determine its toxicities, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), pharmacokinetics, and clinical activity. Eligibility included endocrine-refractory, estrogen receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer. An accelerated titration schedule was applied until moderate or dose-limiting toxicity occurred, followed by a 3+3 design and expansion at 40, 80, and 100 mg per day. Tumor DNA from serum (circulating cell free [cf); all patients] and biopsies [160 mg/day and expansion]) was sequenced. Results Of 41 enrolled patients, 38 were evaluable for MTD determination. Prior endocrine regimens during which progression occurred included aromatase inhibitor (n = 36), fulvestrant (n = 21), and tamoxifen (n = 15). Patients received endoxifen once daily at seven dose levels (20 to 160 mg). Dose escalation ceased at 160 mg per day given lack of MTD and endoxifen concentrations > 1,900 ng/mL. Endoxifen clearance was unaffected by CYP2D6 genotype. One patient (60 mg) had cycle 1 dose-limiting toxicity (pulmonary embolus). Overall clinical benefit rate (stable > 6 months [n = 7] or partial response by RECIST criteria [n = 3]) was 26.3% (95% CI, 13.4% to 43.1%) including prior tamoxifen progression (n = 3). cfDNA mutations were observed in 13 patients ( PIK3CA [n = 8], ESR1 [n = 5], TP53 [n = 4], and AKT [n = 1]) with shorter progression-free survival ( v those without cfDNA mutations; median, 61 v 132 days; log-rank P = .046). Clinical benefit was observed in those with ESR1 amplification (tumor; 80 mg/day) and ESR1 mutation (cfDNA; 160 mg/day). Comparing tumor biopsies and cfDNA, some mutations ( PIK3CA, TP53, and AKT) were undetected by cfDNA, whereas cfDNA mutations ( ESR1, TP53, and AKT) were undetected by biopsy. Conclusion In endocrine-refractory metastatic breast cancer, Z-endoxifen provides substantial drug exposure unaffected by CYP2D6 metabolism, acceptable toxicity, and promising antitumor activity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew P. Goetz
- Matthew P. Goetz, Vera J. Suman, Joel M. Reid, Don W. Northfelt, Michael A. Mahr, Andrew T. Ralya, Mary Kuffel, Sarah A. Buhrow, Stephanie L. Safgren, Renee M. McGovern, John Black, Travis Dockter, Tufia Haddad, Charles Erlichman, Alex A. Adjei, Dan Visscher, Benjamin R. Kipp, Minetta C. Liu, John R. Hawse, Matthew M. Ames, and James N. Ingle, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Zachary R. Chalmers and Garrett Frampton, Foundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA; and John R. Hawse, James H. Doroshow, Jerry M. Collins, and Howard Streicher, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD.,Corresponding author: Matthew P. Goetz, MD, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905; e-mail:
| | - Vera J. Suman
- Matthew P. Goetz, Vera J. Suman, Joel M. Reid, Don W. Northfelt, Michael A. Mahr, Andrew T. Ralya, Mary Kuffel, Sarah A. Buhrow, Stephanie L. Safgren, Renee M. McGovern, John Black, Travis Dockter, Tufia Haddad, Charles Erlichman, Alex A. Adjei, Dan Visscher, Benjamin R. Kipp, Minetta C. Liu, John R. Hawse, Matthew M. Ames, and James N. Ingle, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Zachary R. Chalmers and Garrett Frampton, Foundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA; and John R. Hawse, James H. Doroshow, Jerry M. Collins, and Howard Streicher, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Joel M. Reid
- Matthew P. Goetz, Vera J. Suman, Joel M. Reid, Don W. Northfelt, Michael A. Mahr, Andrew T. Ralya, Mary Kuffel, Sarah A. Buhrow, Stephanie L. Safgren, Renee M. McGovern, John Black, Travis Dockter, Tufia Haddad, Charles Erlichman, Alex A. Adjei, Dan Visscher, Benjamin R. Kipp, Minetta C. Liu, John R. Hawse, Matthew M. Ames, and James N. Ingle, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Zachary R. Chalmers and Garrett Frampton, Foundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA; and John R. Hawse, James H. Doroshow, Jerry M. Collins, and Howard Streicher, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Don W. Northfelt
- Matthew P. Goetz, Vera J. Suman, Joel M. Reid, Don W. Northfelt, Michael A. Mahr, Andrew T. Ralya, Mary Kuffel, Sarah A. Buhrow, Stephanie L. Safgren, Renee M. McGovern, John Black, Travis Dockter, Tufia Haddad, Charles Erlichman, Alex A. Adjei, Dan Visscher, Benjamin R. Kipp, Minetta C. Liu, John R. Hawse, Matthew M. Ames, and James N. Ingle, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Zachary R. Chalmers and Garrett Frampton, Foundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA; and John R. Hawse, James H. Doroshow, Jerry M. Collins, and Howard Streicher, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Michael A. Mahr
- Matthew P. Goetz, Vera J. Suman, Joel M. Reid, Don W. Northfelt, Michael A. Mahr, Andrew T. Ralya, Mary Kuffel, Sarah A. Buhrow, Stephanie L. Safgren, Renee M. McGovern, John Black, Travis Dockter, Tufia Haddad, Charles Erlichman, Alex A. Adjei, Dan Visscher, Benjamin R. Kipp, Minetta C. Liu, John R. Hawse, Matthew M. Ames, and James N. Ingle, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Zachary R. Chalmers and Garrett Frampton, Foundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA; and John R. Hawse, James H. Doroshow, Jerry M. Collins, and Howard Streicher, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Andrew T. Ralya
- Matthew P. Goetz, Vera J. Suman, Joel M. Reid, Don W. Northfelt, Michael A. Mahr, Andrew T. Ralya, Mary Kuffel, Sarah A. Buhrow, Stephanie L. Safgren, Renee M. McGovern, John Black, Travis Dockter, Tufia Haddad, Charles Erlichman, Alex A. Adjei, Dan Visscher, Benjamin R. Kipp, Minetta C. Liu, John R. Hawse, Matthew M. Ames, and James N. Ingle, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Zachary R. Chalmers and Garrett Frampton, Foundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA; and John R. Hawse, James H. Doroshow, Jerry M. Collins, and Howard Streicher, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Mary Kuffel
- Matthew P. Goetz, Vera J. Suman, Joel M. Reid, Don W. Northfelt, Michael A. Mahr, Andrew T. Ralya, Mary Kuffel, Sarah A. Buhrow, Stephanie L. Safgren, Renee M. McGovern, John Black, Travis Dockter, Tufia Haddad, Charles Erlichman, Alex A. Adjei, Dan Visscher, Benjamin R. Kipp, Minetta C. Liu, John R. Hawse, Matthew M. Ames, and James N. Ingle, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Zachary R. Chalmers and Garrett Frampton, Foundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA; and John R. Hawse, James H. Doroshow, Jerry M. Collins, and Howard Streicher, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Sarah A. Buhrow
- Matthew P. Goetz, Vera J. Suman, Joel M. Reid, Don W. Northfelt, Michael A. Mahr, Andrew T. Ralya, Mary Kuffel, Sarah A. Buhrow, Stephanie L. Safgren, Renee M. McGovern, John Black, Travis Dockter, Tufia Haddad, Charles Erlichman, Alex A. Adjei, Dan Visscher, Benjamin R. Kipp, Minetta C. Liu, John R. Hawse, Matthew M. Ames, and James N. Ingle, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Zachary R. Chalmers and Garrett Frampton, Foundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA; and John R. Hawse, James H. Doroshow, Jerry M. Collins, and Howard Streicher, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Stephanie L. Safgren
- Matthew P. Goetz, Vera J. Suman, Joel M. Reid, Don W. Northfelt, Michael A. Mahr, Andrew T. Ralya, Mary Kuffel, Sarah A. Buhrow, Stephanie L. Safgren, Renee M. McGovern, John Black, Travis Dockter, Tufia Haddad, Charles Erlichman, Alex A. Adjei, Dan Visscher, Benjamin R. Kipp, Minetta C. Liu, John R. Hawse, Matthew M. Ames, and James N. Ingle, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Zachary R. Chalmers and Garrett Frampton, Foundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA; and John R. Hawse, James H. Doroshow, Jerry M. Collins, and Howard Streicher, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Renee M. McGovern
- Matthew P. Goetz, Vera J. Suman, Joel M. Reid, Don W. Northfelt, Michael A. Mahr, Andrew T. Ralya, Mary Kuffel, Sarah A. Buhrow, Stephanie L. Safgren, Renee M. McGovern, John Black, Travis Dockter, Tufia Haddad, Charles Erlichman, Alex A. Adjei, Dan Visscher, Benjamin R. Kipp, Minetta C. Liu, John R. Hawse, Matthew M. Ames, and James N. Ingle, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Zachary R. Chalmers and Garrett Frampton, Foundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA; and John R. Hawse, James H. Doroshow, Jerry M. Collins, and Howard Streicher, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - John Black
- Matthew P. Goetz, Vera J. Suman, Joel M. Reid, Don W. Northfelt, Michael A. Mahr, Andrew T. Ralya, Mary Kuffel, Sarah A. Buhrow, Stephanie L. Safgren, Renee M. McGovern, John Black, Travis Dockter, Tufia Haddad, Charles Erlichman, Alex A. Adjei, Dan Visscher, Benjamin R. Kipp, Minetta C. Liu, John R. Hawse, Matthew M. Ames, and James N. Ingle, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Zachary R. Chalmers and Garrett Frampton, Foundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA; and John R. Hawse, James H. Doroshow, Jerry M. Collins, and Howard Streicher, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Travis Dockter
- Matthew P. Goetz, Vera J. Suman, Joel M. Reid, Don W. Northfelt, Michael A. Mahr, Andrew T. Ralya, Mary Kuffel, Sarah A. Buhrow, Stephanie L. Safgren, Renee M. McGovern, John Black, Travis Dockter, Tufia Haddad, Charles Erlichman, Alex A. Adjei, Dan Visscher, Benjamin R. Kipp, Minetta C. Liu, John R. Hawse, Matthew M. Ames, and James N. Ingle, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Zachary R. Chalmers and Garrett Frampton, Foundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA; and John R. Hawse, James H. Doroshow, Jerry M. Collins, and Howard Streicher, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Tufia Haddad
- Matthew P. Goetz, Vera J. Suman, Joel M. Reid, Don W. Northfelt, Michael A. Mahr, Andrew T. Ralya, Mary Kuffel, Sarah A. Buhrow, Stephanie L. Safgren, Renee M. McGovern, John Black, Travis Dockter, Tufia Haddad, Charles Erlichman, Alex A. Adjei, Dan Visscher, Benjamin R. Kipp, Minetta C. Liu, John R. Hawse, Matthew M. Ames, and James N. Ingle, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Zachary R. Chalmers and Garrett Frampton, Foundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA; and John R. Hawse, James H. Doroshow, Jerry M. Collins, and Howard Streicher, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Charles Erlichman
- Matthew P. Goetz, Vera J. Suman, Joel M. Reid, Don W. Northfelt, Michael A. Mahr, Andrew T. Ralya, Mary Kuffel, Sarah A. Buhrow, Stephanie L. Safgren, Renee M. McGovern, John Black, Travis Dockter, Tufia Haddad, Charles Erlichman, Alex A. Adjei, Dan Visscher, Benjamin R. Kipp, Minetta C. Liu, John R. Hawse, Matthew M. Ames, and James N. Ingle, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Zachary R. Chalmers and Garrett Frampton, Foundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA; and John R. Hawse, James H. Doroshow, Jerry M. Collins, and Howard Streicher, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Alex A. Adjei
- Matthew P. Goetz, Vera J. Suman, Joel M. Reid, Don W. Northfelt, Michael A. Mahr, Andrew T. Ralya, Mary Kuffel, Sarah A. Buhrow, Stephanie L. Safgren, Renee M. McGovern, John Black, Travis Dockter, Tufia Haddad, Charles Erlichman, Alex A. Adjei, Dan Visscher, Benjamin R. Kipp, Minetta C. Liu, John R. Hawse, Matthew M. Ames, and James N. Ingle, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Zachary R. Chalmers and Garrett Frampton, Foundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA; and John R. Hawse, James H. Doroshow, Jerry M. Collins, and Howard Streicher, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Dan Visscher
- Matthew P. Goetz, Vera J. Suman, Joel M. Reid, Don W. Northfelt, Michael A. Mahr, Andrew T. Ralya, Mary Kuffel, Sarah A. Buhrow, Stephanie L. Safgren, Renee M. McGovern, John Black, Travis Dockter, Tufia Haddad, Charles Erlichman, Alex A. Adjei, Dan Visscher, Benjamin R. Kipp, Minetta C. Liu, John R. Hawse, Matthew M. Ames, and James N. Ingle, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Zachary R. Chalmers and Garrett Frampton, Foundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA; and John R. Hawse, James H. Doroshow, Jerry M. Collins, and Howard Streicher, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Zachary R. Chalmers
- Matthew P. Goetz, Vera J. Suman, Joel M. Reid, Don W. Northfelt, Michael A. Mahr, Andrew T. Ralya, Mary Kuffel, Sarah A. Buhrow, Stephanie L. Safgren, Renee M. McGovern, John Black, Travis Dockter, Tufia Haddad, Charles Erlichman, Alex A. Adjei, Dan Visscher, Benjamin R. Kipp, Minetta C. Liu, John R. Hawse, Matthew M. Ames, and James N. Ingle, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Zachary R. Chalmers and Garrett Frampton, Foundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA; and John R. Hawse, James H. Doroshow, Jerry M. Collins, and Howard Streicher, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Garrett Frampton
- Matthew P. Goetz, Vera J. Suman, Joel M. Reid, Don W. Northfelt, Michael A. Mahr, Andrew T. Ralya, Mary Kuffel, Sarah A. Buhrow, Stephanie L. Safgren, Renee M. McGovern, John Black, Travis Dockter, Tufia Haddad, Charles Erlichman, Alex A. Adjei, Dan Visscher, Benjamin R. Kipp, Minetta C. Liu, John R. Hawse, Matthew M. Ames, and James N. Ingle, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Zachary R. Chalmers and Garrett Frampton, Foundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA; and John R. Hawse, James H. Doroshow, Jerry M. Collins, and Howard Streicher, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Benjamin R. Kipp
- Matthew P. Goetz, Vera J. Suman, Joel M. Reid, Don W. Northfelt, Michael A. Mahr, Andrew T. Ralya, Mary Kuffel, Sarah A. Buhrow, Stephanie L. Safgren, Renee M. McGovern, John Black, Travis Dockter, Tufia Haddad, Charles Erlichman, Alex A. Adjei, Dan Visscher, Benjamin R. Kipp, Minetta C. Liu, John R. Hawse, Matthew M. Ames, and James N. Ingle, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Zachary R. Chalmers and Garrett Frampton, Foundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA; and John R. Hawse, James H. Doroshow, Jerry M. Collins, and Howard Streicher, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Minetta C. Liu
- Matthew P. Goetz, Vera J. Suman, Joel M. Reid, Don W. Northfelt, Michael A. Mahr, Andrew T. Ralya, Mary Kuffel, Sarah A. Buhrow, Stephanie L. Safgren, Renee M. McGovern, John Black, Travis Dockter, Tufia Haddad, Charles Erlichman, Alex A. Adjei, Dan Visscher, Benjamin R. Kipp, Minetta C. Liu, John R. Hawse, Matthew M. Ames, and James N. Ingle, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Zachary R. Chalmers and Garrett Frampton, Foundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA; and John R. Hawse, James H. Doroshow, Jerry M. Collins, and Howard Streicher, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - John R. Hawse
- Matthew P. Goetz, Vera J. Suman, Joel M. Reid, Don W. Northfelt, Michael A. Mahr, Andrew T. Ralya, Mary Kuffel, Sarah A. Buhrow, Stephanie L. Safgren, Renee M. McGovern, John Black, Travis Dockter, Tufia Haddad, Charles Erlichman, Alex A. Adjei, Dan Visscher, Benjamin R. Kipp, Minetta C. Liu, John R. Hawse, Matthew M. Ames, and James N. Ingle, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Zachary R. Chalmers and Garrett Frampton, Foundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA; and John R. Hawse, James H. Doroshow, Jerry M. Collins, and Howard Streicher, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - James H. Doroshow
- Matthew P. Goetz, Vera J. Suman, Joel M. Reid, Don W. Northfelt, Michael A. Mahr, Andrew T. Ralya, Mary Kuffel, Sarah A. Buhrow, Stephanie L. Safgren, Renee M. McGovern, John Black, Travis Dockter, Tufia Haddad, Charles Erlichman, Alex A. Adjei, Dan Visscher, Benjamin R. Kipp, Minetta C. Liu, John R. Hawse, Matthew M. Ames, and James N. Ingle, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Zachary R. Chalmers and Garrett Frampton, Foundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA; and John R. Hawse, James H. Doroshow, Jerry M. Collins, and Howard Streicher, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Jerry M. Collins
- Matthew P. Goetz, Vera J. Suman, Joel M. Reid, Don W. Northfelt, Michael A. Mahr, Andrew T. Ralya, Mary Kuffel, Sarah A. Buhrow, Stephanie L. Safgren, Renee M. McGovern, John Black, Travis Dockter, Tufia Haddad, Charles Erlichman, Alex A. Adjei, Dan Visscher, Benjamin R. Kipp, Minetta C. Liu, John R. Hawse, Matthew M. Ames, and James N. Ingle, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Zachary R. Chalmers and Garrett Frampton, Foundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA; and John R. Hawse, James H. Doroshow, Jerry M. Collins, and Howard Streicher, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Howard Streicher
- Matthew P. Goetz, Vera J. Suman, Joel M. Reid, Don W. Northfelt, Michael A. Mahr, Andrew T. Ralya, Mary Kuffel, Sarah A. Buhrow, Stephanie L. Safgren, Renee M. McGovern, John Black, Travis Dockter, Tufia Haddad, Charles Erlichman, Alex A. Adjei, Dan Visscher, Benjamin R. Kipp, Minetta C. Liu, John R. Hawse, Matthew M. Ames, and James N. Ingle, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Zachary R. Chalmers and Garrett Frampton, Foundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA; and John R. Hawse, James H. Doroshow, Jerry M. Collins, and Howard Streicher, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Matthew M. Ames
- Matthew P. Goetz, Vera J. Suman, Joel M. Reid, Don W. Northfelt, Michael A. Mahr, Andrew T. Ralya, Mary Kuffel, Sarah A. Buhrow, Stephanie L. Safgren, Renee M. McGovern, John Black, Travis Dockter, Tufia Haddad, Charles Erlichman, Alex A. Adjei, Dan Visscher, Benjamin R. Kipp, Minetta C. Liu, John R. Hawse, Matthew M. Ames, and James N. Ingle, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Zachary R. Chalmers and Garrett Frampton, Foundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA; and John R. Hawse, James H. Doroshow, Jerry M. Collins, and Howard Streicher, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - James N. Ingle
- Matthew P. Goetz, Vera J. Suman, Joel M. Reid, Don W. Northfelt, Michael A. Mahr, Andrew T. Ralya, Mary Kuffel, Sarah A. Buhrow, Stephanie L. Safgren, Renee M. McGovern, John Black, Travis Dockter, Tufia Haddad, Charles Erlichman, Alex A. Adjei, Dan Visscher, Benjamin R. Kipp, Minetta C. Liu, John R. Hawse, Matthew M. Ames, and James N. Ingle, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Zachary R. Chalmers and Garrett Frampton, Foundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA; and John R. Hawse, James H. Doroshow, Jerry M. Collins, and Howard Streicher, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Goodman AM, Choi M, Wieduwilt M, Mulroney C, Costello C, Frampton G, Miller V, Kurzrock R. Next Generation Sequencing Reveals Potentially Actionable Alterations in the Majority of Patients with Lymphoid Malignancies. JCO Precis Oncol 2017; 1. [PMID: 28681041 DOI: 10.1200/po.16.00004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Next generation sequencing (NGS) identifies alterations that may be potentially targetable by Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved drugs and/or by available experimental agents that may not have otherwise been contemplated. Many targeted drugs have been developed for diverse solid cancers; a smaller number of genomically targeted drugs have been approved for lymphoid malignancies. We analyzed NGS results from 60 patients with various lymphoid malignancies and found a total of 224 alterations (median per patient = 3). Forty-nine patients (82%) had potentially actionable alterations using FDA-approved drugs and/or experimental therapies; only 11 patients (18%) had no theoretically actionable alterations. Only three patients (5%) had an alteration for which an approved drug in the disease is available (on-label); 45 patients (75%) had an alteration for which an approved drug is available in another disease (off-label). The median number of alterations per patient potentially actionable by an FDA-approved drug was 1. Interestingly, 19 of 60 patients (32%) had intermediate to high tumor mutational burden, which may predict response to certain immunotherapy agents. In conclusion, NGS identifies alterations that may be pharmacologically tractable in most patients with lymphoid malignancies, albeit with drugs that have usually been developed in the context of solid tumors. These observations merit expanded exploration in the clinical trials setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aaron M Goodman
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, and Center for Personalized Cancer Therapy, University of California San Diego, Moores Cancer Center.,Department of Medicine, Division of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, University of California San Diego, Moores Cancer Center
| | - Michael Choi
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, and Center for Personalized Cancer Therapy, University of California San Diego, Moores Cancer Center
| | - Matthew Wieduwilt
- Department of Medicine, Division of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, University of California San Diego, Moores Cancer Center
| | - Carolyn Mulroney
- Department of Medicine, Division of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, University of California San Diego, Moores Cancer Center
| | - Caitlin Costello
- Department of Medicine, Division of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, University of California San Diego, Moores Cancer Center
| | | | | | - Razelle Kurzrock
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, and Center for Personalized Cancer Therapy, University of California San Diego, Moores Cancer Center
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Schrock A, Sharma N, Peled N, Bufill J, Srkalovic G, Spigel D, Fabrizio D, Frampton G, Connelly C, Lipka MB, Belilovski A, Lo J, Li Y, Sun J, Gowen K, Kalemkerian G, Raez L, Ou SH, Ross J, Stephens P, Ali S, Miller V. MA14.01 Updated Dataset Assessing Tumor Mutation Burden (TMB) as a Biomarker for Response to PD-1/PD-L1 Targeted Therapies in Lung Cancer (LC). J Thorac Oncol 2017. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2016.11.487] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|
49
|
Kowanetz M, Zou W, Shames D, Cummings C, Rizvi N, Spira A, Frampton G, Leveque V, Flynn S, Mocci S, Shankar G, Funke R, Ballinger M, Waterkamp D, Chen D, Sandler A, Hampton G, Amler L, Hegde P, Hellmann M. OA20.01 Tumor Mutation Burden (TMB) is Associated with Improved Efficacy of Atezolizumab in 1L and 2L+ NSCLC Patients. J Thorac Oncol 2017. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2016.11.343] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|
50
|
Ikeda S, Goodman AM, Cohen PR, Jensen TJ, Ellison CK, Frampton G, Miller V, Patel SP, Kurzrock R. Metastatic basal cell carcinoma with amplification of PD-L1: exceptional response to anti-PD1 therapy. NPJ Genom Med 2016; 1. [PMID: 27942391 PMCID: PMC5142752 DOI: 10.1038/npjgenmed.2016.37] [Citation(s) in RCA: 91] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Metastatic basal cell carcinomas are rare malignancies harbouring Hedgehog pathway alterations targetable by SMO antagonists (vismodegib/sonidegib). We describe, for the first time, the molecular genetics and response of a patient with Hedgehog inhibitor-resistant metastatic basal cell carcinoma who achieved rapid tumour regression (ongoing near complete remission at 4 months) with nivolumab (anti-PD1 antibody). He had multiple hallmarks of anti-PD1 responsiveness including high mutational burden (>50 mutations per megabase; 19 functional alterations in tissue next-generation sequencing (NGS; 315 genes)) as well as PDL1/PDL2/JAK2 amplification (as determined by both tissue NGS and by analysis of plasma-derived cell-free DNA). The latter was performed using technology originally developed for the genome-wide detection of sub-chromosomal copy-number alterations (CNAs) in noninvasive prenatal testing and showed numerous CNAs including amplification of the 9p24.3-9p22.2 region containing PD-L1, PD-L2 and JAK2. Of interest, PD-L1, PD-L2 and JAK2 amplification is a characteristic of Hodgkin lymphoma, which is exquisitely sensitive to nivolumab. In conclusion, selected SMO antagonist-resistant metastatic basal cell carcinomas may respond to nivolumab based on underlying molecular genetic mechanisms that include PD-L1 amplification and high tumour mutational burden.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sadakatsu Ikeda
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of California, La Jolla, CA, USA; Center for Personalized Cancer Therapy, University of California San Diego, Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, CA, USA; Cancer Center, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Aaron M Goodman
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of California, La Jolla, CA, USA; Center for Personalized Cancer Therapy, University of California San Diego, Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Philip R Cohen
- Department of Dermatology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Sandip P Patel
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of California, La Jolla, CA, USA; Center for Personalized Cancer Therapy, University of California San Diego, Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Razelle Kurzrock
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of California, La Jolla, CA, USA; Center for Personalized Cancer Therapy, University of California San Diego, Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|