Multidisciplinary teams in the clinical care of fibrotic interstitial lung disease: current perspectives

Optimizing patient outcomes in interstitial lung disease through pre- and post-transplant management strategies

Interstitial lung diseases (ILD) encompass a diverse group of over 200 chronic pulmonary disorders characterized by varying degrees of inflammation and fibrosis, which can lead to severe respiratory impairment. Lung transplantation offers a crucial therapeutic option for patients with advanced ILD, extending survival and improving quality of life. This review explores optimal management strategies in both the pre- and post-transplant phases to enhance patient outcomes. Comprehensive pre-transplant evaluation, including pulmonary function testing, imaging, and comorbidity assessment, is critical for determining transplant eligibility and timing. Post-transplant care must focus on preventing complications such as primary graft dysfunction and chronic lung allograft dysfunction, managed through tailored immunosuppression and proactive monitoring. Recent advancements in diagnostic techniques and therapeutic approaches, including emerging technologies like ex vivo lung perfusion and precision medicine, promise to further improve outcomes. The ultimate goal is to establish an evidence-based, multidisciplinary framework for optimizing ILD management and lung transplantation.

Challenges of symptom management in interstitial lung disease: dyspnea, cough, and fatigue

INTRODUCTION

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a broad group of conditions characterized by fibrosis of the lung parenchyma. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is the most common subvariant. IPF is marked by considerable symptom burden of dyspnea, cough and fatigue that is often refractory to optimal disease-directed treatment.

AREAS COVERED

In this narrative review, we searched MEDLINE for articles related to the current evidence regarding management of chronic dyspnea, cough, and fatigue as three of the most prevalent and distressing symptoms associated with IPF and other ILDs. Each symptom shares common features of multi-factorial etiology and a lack of safe and effective pharmacological therapies. Both corticosteroids and opioids have been utilized in this context, yet there is insufficient evidence of therapeutic benefit and considerable risk of harms. Whilst some may benefit from symptom-directed pharmacological management, usage must be carefully monitored. Use of non-pharmacological strategies, such as breathing techniques and speech therapy represent low risk and low-cost option, yet broader validation of these therapies' effectiveness is needed.

EXPERT OPINION

Symptom management in IPF and other ILDs requires an iterative and individualized approach. Leveraging the expertise of multidisciplinary teams within an integrated care setting is an important opportunity to maximize health outcomes.

Predictive factors of fibrotic interstitial lung abnormality on high-resolution computed tomography scans: a prospective observational study

BACKGROUND

Fibrotic types of interstitial lung abnormalities seen on high-resolution computed tomography scans, characterised by traction bronchiolectasis/bronchiectasis with or without honeycombing, are predictors of progression and poor prognostic factors of interstitial lung abnormalities. There are no reports on the clinical characteristics of fibrotic interstitial lung abnormalities on high-resolution computed tomography scans. Therefore, we aimed to examine these clinical characteristics and clarify the predictive factors of fibrotic interstitial lung abnormalities on high-resolution computed tomography scans.

METHODS

Clinical and paraclinical data of 164 patients enrolled in the initial year of a multicentre prospective observational study (Kumamoto interstitial lung abnormalities study in Japan) involving over 62,000 examinees during routine health examinations were analysed. Clinical laboratory evaluations are expressed as medians and interquartile ranges for each evaluation time point, and boxplots were created for graphical representation. The percentages of abnormal clinical laboratory results were compared between the groups using chi-square or Fisher's exact tests. Univariate or multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to analyse the relationship between fibrotic interstitial lung abnormalities and other clinical factors.

RESULTS

Fibrotic interstitial lung abnormalities were observed on high-resolution computed tomography scans in 135 (82%) patients at the time of diagnosis. Multivariate analysis showed that older age (Odds ratio, 1.06; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.12; p = 0.021), auscultatory fine crackles (Odds ratio, 3.39; 95% confidence interval, 1.33-8.65; p < 0.01), and elevated serum surfactant protein-D (Odds ratio, 2.68; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-8.64; p = 0.045) were independent predictive factors of fibrotic interstitial lung abnormalities. The predicted area under the curve of the fibrotic interstitial lung abnormalities based on these three factors was 0.77 (95% confidence interval, 0.68-0.86). The proportion of undecided diagnoses in the fibrotic interstitial lung abnormalities group (14%) was significantly lower than that in the non-fibrotic interstitial lung abnormalities group (41%) (p = 0.0027).

CONCLUSIONS

Fine crackles on auscultation and elevated serum surfactant protein-D levels are predictors of fibrotic interstitial lung abnormalities in older patients with interstitial lung abnormalities. These findings may assist non-radiological physicians in referring patients to specialists for early intervention in progressive fibrotic interstitial lung diseases.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER/DATE

UMIN000045149/2021.12.1.

Interstitial Lung Disease Associated with Anti-Ku Antibodies: A Case Series of 19 Patients

Background: Antibodies against Ku have been described in patients with various connective tissue diseases. The objective of this study was to describe the clinical, functional, and imaging characteristics of interstitial lung disease in patients with anti-Ku antibodies. Methods: This single-center, retrospective observational study was conducted at a tertiary referral institution. Patients with positive anti-Ku antibodies and interstitial lung disease identified between 2007 and 2022 were included. Clinical, immunological, functional, and imaging data were systematically reviewed. Results: Nineteen patients (ten females) with a mean age of 59 ± 12.6 years were included. The most frequent associated diagnosis was systemic sclerosis (42%), followed by rheumatoid arthritis (26%), Sjögren syndrome, undifferentiated connective tissue disease, and overlap between systemic sclerosis and idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (scleromyositis). Imaging revealed frequent septal and intralobular reticulations and ground-glass opacities, with nonspecific interstitial pneumonia as the predominant pattern (53%). The mean forced vital capacity was 82% ± 26 of the predicted value, and the mean diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide was 55% ± 21. Over the first year of follow-up, the mean annual forced vital capacity decline was 140 mL/year (range: 0-1610 mL/year). The overall survival rate was 82% at 5 years and 67% at 10 years. Conclusions: Most patients with interstitial lung disease and anti-Ku antibodies presented with dyspnea, a mild-to-moderate restrictive ventilatory pattern, and reduced diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide. The CT pattern was heterogeneous but was consistent with nonspecific interstitial pneumonia in half of the patients.

A Practical Multidisciplinary Approach to Identifying Interstitial Lung Disease in Systemic Autoimmune Rheumatic Diseases: A Clinician's Narrative Review

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is one of the common and potentially lethal manifestations of systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARDs). ILD's prevalence, clinical patterns, imaging, and natural history are variable. Each of the representative diseases-systemic sclerosis (SSc), idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), Sjӧgren's syndrome (SjS), mixed connective tissue disease (MCTD), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)-have distinct clinical, paraclinical and evolutionary features. Risk factors with predictive value for ILD have been identified. This review summarizes, from the clinician's perspective, recent data from the literature regarding the specificity of ILD for each of the autoimmune rheumatic diseases, with an emphasis on the role of the multidisciplinary team in early diagnosis, case management, as well as the particularities of the clinical approach to the progressive phenotype of ILD in SARDs.

Use of a radiology tool for the diagnosis of pulmonary fibrosis

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this paper was to perform an exploratory reader study to assess the utility of a web-based application in assisting non-chest radiologist in correctly diagnosing the radiographic pattern of pulmonary fibrosis.

METHODS

Three non-chest radiologists with 5 to 20 years of experience individually reviewed 3 rounds of randomly chosen chest CT scans (round 1: 100 scans, round 2: 50 scans, round 3: 25 scans) from a list of patients with established diagnosis of pulmonary fibrosis. In round 1, radiologists were asked to directly record their diagnosis for the pattern of fibrosis. In round 2 and 3 they were asked to review for features provided in a web-based application and provide diagnosis based on the most likely predicted diagnosis from the application. There was an approximate 1-month interval and relevant tutorials were provided between each round. Diagnosis accuracy is reported by readers at each round.

RESULTS

The overall accuracy increased from 63 % (n = 188/299) in round 1 to 74 % in round 3 (n = 52/70) (p = 0.0265). Difficulty in recognition of mosaic attenuation and homogeneous has led to misdiagnosis. Refining the definition for feature homogeneous increased the diagnosis accuracy of NSIP from 42 % (n = 20/48) in round 2 to 65 % (n = 24/37) in round 3(p = 0.0179). The Fleiss Kappa across readers varied from Round 1 to Round 3 with values 0.36 to 0.42.

CONCLUSIONS

Using the web-based application with refined definition for feature homogeneous helps to improve the non-subspecialty radiologist's accuracy in diagnosing different types of fibrosis.

Patient-centered care in pulmonary fibrosis: access, anticipate, and act

Comprehensive care integrates individual patient needs and is highly valued for patients with pulmonary fibrosis (PF). The importance of a patient-centered care approach is rooted in the unpredictable progressiveness of the disease course in PF. The respiratory impairment associated with PF has a major impact on the quality of life for both patients and their caregivers. We believe that prioritizing patient preferences could improve the shared decision making process and may ultimately lead to better health outcomes. Despite the growing emphasis for this approach, it remains challenging to adopt it in clinical practice. In this review, we propose the comprehensive Triple A Care Model, consisting of the domains Access, Anticipate, and Act, which emphasizes core elements of patient-centered care for patients with PF. We will provide an overview of the unmet needs in care for patients with PF and elaborate on the current methods for delivering patient-centered care. The latest insights into symptom management and supportive measures and several approaches to improving access to care are discussed, in line with the most recent guidelines.

Assessing disease activity in scleroderma-related interstitial lung disease: a review and practical guide to management

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a heterogeneous disease with a propensity to involve multiple organ systems. There is a significant proportion of these patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) who are at risk of mortality and morbidity. There are limited available tools to assess the severity of parenchymal lung involvement and are subject to confounding factors, including the presence of pulmonary hypertension and concomitant smoking history. The diagnostic tools include careful clinical history, examination, thoracic imaging, and pulmonary function tests. One of the limitations of assessing disease severity in SSc-ILD is the lack of standardized definitions for disease activity and serum biomarkers to predict future progression. Although there has been significant progress in managing SSc-related ILD over the last couple of decades with a few randomized double-blind clinical trials assessing the role of immunosuppression (mainly Cyclophosphamide and Mycophenolate Mofetil), the efficacy of these therapies is at best modest and is associated with significant toxicities. Furthermore, Nintedanib has shown promise in reducing forced vital capacity decline in SSc-ILD and in progressive fibrotic-ILD of a range of etiologies. Data are emerging for therapies like Rituximab and Tocilizumab, and we are likely to see further evidence of similar drugs being efficacious in this disease cohort. A relatively simplified algorithm is proposed in this review to guide clinicians dealing with ILD and SSc. It is imperative that clinicians take a multi-disciplinary approach to managing this complex disease in a changing therapeutic landscape.

[Interstitial lung diseases : From imaging to treatment]

BACKGROUND

The role of radiology in the diagnosis of interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) has evolved over time, in part replacing histology. Radiology now represents a pillar of diagnostics and monitoring in ILDs.

OBJECTIVE

To what extent does radiology influence diagnostics and treatment in ILDs?

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A literature review was conducted, and current findings were discussed in the context of clinical data.

RESULTS

Radiology plays a crucial role in the diagnosis of ILDs. Within the framework of the multidisciplinary conference, it provides specific CT patterns such as usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP), nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP), and organizing pneumonia (OP), or helps in identifying cystic lung diseases. Multicompartment diseases can be detected, and pulmonary hypertension or extrapulmonary involvement of the respective diseases can be suspected. Progressive pulmonary fibrosis requires radiologic assessment as one of the required criteria. Interstitial lung abnormalities are usually detected by radiological studies performed for an unrelated indication.

CONCLUSION

Radiology plays an important role within the multidisciplinary conference to determine both diagnosis and treatment with antifibrotic or anti-inflammatory drugs, or a combination of both.

[Influence of Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. Data from the Registry of the Spanish Society of Pulmonology and Thoracic Surgery]

Objective

The objective of the study was to analyze the diagnostic process and the time until the start of treatment of patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis in relation to the publication of successive clinical practice guide.

Material and methods

Multicenter, observational, ambispective study, in which patients includes in the idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis registry of the Spanish Society of Pulmonologist and Thoracic Surgery were analyzed. An electronic data collection notebook was enabled on the society's website. Sociodemographic and clinical variables were collected at diagnosis and follow-up of the patients.

Results

From January 2012 to december 2019, 1064 patients were included in the registry, with 929 finally analyzed. The diagnosis process varied depending on the year in which it was performed, and the radiological pattern observed in the high-resolution computed tomography. Up to 26.3% of the cases (244) were diagnosed with chest high-resolution computed tomography and clinical evaluation. Surgical biopsy was used up to 50.2% of cases diagnosed before 2011, while it has been used in 14.2% since 2018. The median time from the onset of symptoms to diagnosis was 360 days (IQR 120-720), taking more than 2 years in the 21.0% of patients. A percentage of 79.4 of patients received antifibrotic treatment. The average time from diagnosis to the antifibrotic treatment has been 309 ± 596.5 days, with a median of 49 (IQR 0-307).

Conclusions

The diagnostic process, including the time until diagnosis and the type of test used, has changed from 2011 to 2019, probably due to advances in clinical research and the publication of diagnostic-therapeutic consensus guidelines.

Interstitial Lung Disease Associated with Systemic Sclerosis

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a rare autoimmune disease characterized by a tripod combining vasculopathy, fibrosis, and immune-mediated inflammatory processes. The prevalence of interstitial lung disease (ILD) in SSc varies according to the methods used to detect it, ranging from 25 to 95%. The fibrotic and vascular pulmonary manifestations of SSc, particularly ILD, are the main causes of morbidity and mortality, contributing to 35% of deaths. Although early trials were conducted with cyclophosphamide, more recent randomized controlled trials have been performed to assess the efficacy and tolerability of several medications, mostly mycophenolate, rituximab, tocilizumab, and nintedanib. Although many uncertainties remain, expert consensus is emerging to optimize the therapeutic management and to provide clinicians with evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for patients with SSc-ILD. This article provides an overview, in the light of the latest advances, of the available evidence for the diagnosis and management of SSc-ILD.

Practical guidance for the early recognition and follow-up of patients with connective tissue disease-related interstitial lung disease

BACKGROUND

The early detection and management of (progressive) interstitial lung disease in patients with connective tissue diseases requires the attention and skills of a multidisciplinary team. However, there are currently no well-established standards to guide the daily practice of physicians treating this heterogenous group of diseases.

RESEARCH QUESTION

This paper aimed to identify gaps in scientific knowledge along the journey of patients with connective tissue disease-related interstitial lung disease and to provide tools for earlier identification of interstitial lung disease and progressive disease.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

The opinions of an international expert panel, which consisted of pulmonologists and rheumatologists were collected and interpreted in the light of peer-reviewed data.

RESULTS

Interstitial lung disease is a common complication of connective tissue diseases, but prevalence estimates vary by subtype. Screening and monitoring by means of clinical examination, chest radiography, pulmonary function testing, and disease-specific biomarkers provide insight into the disease activity of patients presenting with connective tissue diseases in a routine setting. Multiple phenotypic and genotypic characteristics have been identified as predictors of the development and progression of interstitial lung disease. However, these risk factors differ between subtypes. To ensure earlier diagnosis of rapidly progressive phenotypes, a risk-based method is necessary for determining the need for HRCT and additional testing.

INTERPRETATION

To reduce the underdiagnosis of CTD-ILDs in clinical practice, a standardized and systematic multidisciplinary risk-based approach is suggested. Collaboration across disciplines is essential for the management of CTD-ILD.

Interstitial lung disease: a review of classification, etiology, epidemiology, clinical diagnosis, pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment

Interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) refer to a heterogeneous and complex group of conditions characterized by inflammation, fibrosis, or both, in the interstitium of the lungs. This results in impaired gas exchange, leading to a worsening of respiratory symptoms and a decline in lung function. While the etiology of some ILDs is unclear, most cases can be traced back to factors such as genetic predispositions, environmental exposures (including allergens, toxins, and air pollution), underlying autoimmune diseases, or the use of certain medications. There has been an increase in research and evidence aimed at identifying etiology, understanding epidemiology, improving clinical diagnosis, and developing both pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the current state of knowledge in the field of interstitial lung diseases.

Multidisciplinary Approach to the Diagnosis of Idiopathic Interstitial Pneumonias: Focus on the Pathologist's Key Role

Idiopathic Interstitial Pneumonias (IIPs) are a heterogeneous group of the broader category of Interstitial Lung Diseases (ILDs), pathologically characterized by the distortion of lung parenchyma by interstitial inflammation and/or fibrosis. The American Thoracic Society (ATS)/European Respiratory Society (ERS) international multidisciplinary consensus classification of the IIPs was published in 2002 and then updated in 2013, with the authors emphasizing the need for a multidisciplinary approach to the diagnosis of IIPs. The histological evaluation of IIPs is challenging, and different types of IIPs are classically associated with specific histopathological patterns. However, morphological overlaps can be observed, and the same histopathological features can be seen in totally different clinical settings. Therefore, the pathologist's aim is to recognize the pathologic-morphologic pattern of disease in this clinical setting, and only after multi-disciplinary evaluation, if there is concordance between clinical and radiological findings, a definitive diagnosis of specific IIP can be established, allowing the optimal clinical-therapeutic management of the patient.

Supporting self-management for patients with Interstitial Lung Diseases: Utility and acceptability of digital devices

INTRODUCTION

Patients diagnosed with Interstitial Lung Diseases (ILD) use devices to self-monitor their health and well-being. Little is known about the range of devices, selection, frequency and terms of use and overall utility. We sought to quantify patients' usage and experiences with home digital devices, and further evaluate their perceived utility and barriers to adaptation.

METHODS

A team of expert clinicians and patient partners interested in self-management approaches designed a 48-question cross-sectional electronic survey; specifically targeted at individuals diagnosed with ILD. The survey was critically appraised by the interdisciplinary self-management group at Royal Devon University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust during a 6-month validation process. The survey was open for participation between September 2021 and December 2022, and responses were collected anonymously. Data were analysed descriptively for quantitative aspects and through thematic analysis for qualitative input.

RESULTS

104 patients accessed the survey and 89/104 (86%) reported a diagnosis of lung fibrosis, including 46/89 (52%) idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) with 57/89 (64%) of participants diagnosed >3 years and 59/89 (66%) female. 52/65(80%) were in the UK; 33/65 (51%) reported severe breathlessness medical research council MRC grade 3-4 and 32/65 (49%) disclosed co-morbid arthritis or joint problems. Of these, 18/83 (22%) used a hand- held spirometer, with only 6/17 (35%) advised on how to interpret the readings. Pulse oximetry devices were the most frequently used device by 35/71 (49%) and 20/64 (31%) measured their saturations more than once daily. 29/63 (46%) of respondents reported home-monitoring brought reassurance; of these, for 25/63 (40%) a feeling of control. 10/57 (18%) felt it had a negative effect, citing fluctuating readings as causing stress and 'paranoia'. The most likely help-seeking triggers were worsening breathlessness 53/65 (82%) and low oxygen saturation 43/65 (66%). Nurse specialists were the most frequent source of help 24/63 (38%). Conclusion: Patients can learn appropriate technical skills, yet perceptions of home-monitoring are variable; targeted assessment and tailored support is likely to be beneficial.

Role of Telomere Length in Survival of Patients with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis and Other Interstitial Lung Diseases

Interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) constitute a group of more than 200 disorders, with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) being one of the most frequent. Telomere length (TL) shortening causes loss of function of the lung parenchyma. However, little is known about its role as a prognostic factor in ILD patients. With the aim of investigating the role of TL and telomerase activity in the prognosis of patients affected by ILDs, we analysed lung tissue samples from 61 patients. We measured relative TL and telomerase activity by conventional procedures. Both clinical and molecular parameters were associated with overall survival by the Kaplan-Meier method. Patients with IPF had poorer prognosis than patients with other ILDs (p = 0.034). When patients were classified according to TL, those with shortened telomeres reported lower overall survival (p = 0.085); differences reached statistical significance after excluding ILD patients who developed cancer (p = 0.021). In a Cox regression analysis, TL behaved as a risk-modifying variable for death associated with rheumatic disease (RD) co-occurrence (p = 0.029). Also, in patients without cancer, ferritin was significantly increased in cases with RD and IPF co-occurrence (p = 0.032). In relation to telomerase activity, no significant differences were detected. In conclusion, TL in lung tissue emerges as a prognostic factor in ILD patients. Specifically, in cases with RD and IPF co-occurrence, TL can be considered as a risk-modifying variable for death.

Speaking of the "Devil": Diagnostic Errors in Interstitial Lung Diseases

Interstitial lung diseases are respiratory diseases, which affect the normal lung parenchyma and can lead to significant pulmonary fibrosis, chronic respiratory failure, pulmonary hypertension, and ultimately death. Reuniting more than 200 entities, interstitial lung diseases pose a significant challenge to the clinician, as they represent rare diseases with vague and insidious respiratory symptoms. As such, there are many diagnostic errors that can appear along the journey of the patient with ILD, which leads to significant delays with implications for the prognosis and the quality of life of the patient.

Imaging Features of Autoimmune Disease-Related Interstitial Lung Diseases

Interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) associated with autoimmune diseases show characteristic signs of imaging. Radiologic signs are also used in the identification of ILDs with features suggestive of autoimmune disease that do not meet the criteria for a specific autoimmune disease. Radiologists play a key role in identifying these signs and assessing their relevance as part of multidisciplinary team discussions. A radiologist may be the first health care professional to pick up signs of autoimmune disease in a patient referred for assessment of ILD or with suspicion for ILD. Multidisciplinary team discussion of imaging findings observed during follow-up may inform a change in diagnosis or identify progression, with implications for a patient's treatment regimen. This article describes the imaging features of autoimmune disease-related ILDs and the role of radiologists in assessing their relevance.

Role of the internet of medical things in care for patients with interstitial lung disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Online technologies play an increasing role in facilitating care for patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD). In this review, we will give an overview of different applications of the internet of medical things (IoMT) for patients with ILD.

RECENT FINDINGS

Various applications of the IoMT, including teleconsultations, virtual MDTs, digital information, and online peer support, are now used in daily care of patients with ILD. Several studies showed that other IoMT applications, such as online home monitoring and telerehabilitation, seem feasible and reliable, but widespread implementation in clinical practice is lacking. The use of artificial intelligence algorithms and online data clouds in ILD is still in its infancy, but has the potential to improve remote, outpatient clinic, and in-hospital care processes. Further studies in large real-world cohorts to confirm and clinically validate results from previous studies are needed.

SUMMARY

We believe that in the near future innovative technologies, facilitated by the IoMT, will further enhance individually targeted treatment for patients with ILD by interlinking and combining data from various sources.

Virtual communication is commonly used in Finnish interstitial lung disease multidisciplinary meetings

Multidisciplinary meeting (MDM) is a core element in the diagnosis of interstitial lung diseases (ILD). The aim of the study was to investigate the implementation and key elements related to ILD MDMs in Finnish specialized care, which is characterized by long travel distances and a large number of small centers treating patients suffering from ILDs. An electronic questionnaire was sent to ILD experts working at five academic centers of Finland regarding the implementation of ILD MDMs with the focus on utilization of virtual communication. Responses were received from all academic centers of Finland (n = 5) whose catchment areas cover all of Finland. ILD MDMs were organized in each center approximately every two weeks and the core participants included a radiologist, respiratory physicians, junior staff, pathologist and a rheumatologist. All non-academic centers could refer their patients to be evaluated in ILD MDM of an academic center. Virtual communication was utilized by all academic centers in the implementation of ILD MDMs, being most common among small centers located in Eastern and Northern Finland. Virtual access to ILD MDM of an academic center was available in most parts of Finland, enabling small centers to benefit from the ILD expertise of academic centers.

Diagnosis and Pharmacologic Management of Fibrotic Interstitial Lung Disease

Interstitial lung disease is an umbrella term that encompasses a spectrum of parenchymal lung pathologies affecting the gas exchanging part of the lung. While many of these disease entities are not fibrotic in nature, a number can lead to pulmonary fibrosis which may or may not progress over time. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis is the prototypical, progressive fibrotic interstitial lung disease, which can lead to worsening hypoxemic respiratory failure and mortality within a number of years from the time of diagnosis. The importance of an accurate and timely diagnosis of interstitial lung diseases, which is needed to inform prognosis and guide clinical management, cannot be overemphasized. Developing a consensus diagnosis requires the incorporation of a variety of factors by a multidisciplinary team, which then may or may not determine a need for tissue sampling. Clinical management can be challenging given the heterogeneity of disease behavior and the paucity of controlled trials to guide decision making. This review addresses current paradigms and recent updates in the diagnosis and pharmacologic management of these fibrotic interstitial lung diseases.

Role of the occupational disease consultant in the multidisciplinary discussion of interstitial lung diseases

BACKGROUND

Diffuse interstitial lung diseases (ILD) constitute a heterogeneous group of conditions with complex etiological diagnoses requiring a multidisciplinary approach. Much is still unknown about them, particularly their relationship with occupational exposures. The primary objective of this study was to investigate the distribution of occupational exposures according to type of ILD. The secondary objectives were to estimate the proportion of ILDs possibly related to occupational exposure and to evaluate the added value of the participation of an occupational disease consultant in ILD multidisciplinary discussions (MDD).

METHODS

From May to December 2020, all consecutive patients with ILD whose cases were reviewed during a MDD in a referral centre for ILD were prospectively offered a consultation with an occupational disease consultant.

RESULTS

Of the 156 patients with ILD whose cases were reviewed in MDD during the study period, 141 patients attended an occupational exposure consultation. Occupational exposure was identified in 97 patients. Occupational exposure to asbestos was found in 12/31 (38.7%) patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and in 9/18 (50.0%) patients with unclassifiable fibrosis. Occupational exposure to metal dust was found in 13/31 (41.9%) patients with IPFs and 10/18 (55.6%) patients with unclassifiable fibrosis. Silica exposure was found in 12/50 (24.0%) patients with autoimmune ILD. The link between occupational exposure and ILD was confirmed for 41 patients after the specialist occupational consultation. The occupational origin had not been considered (n = 9) or had been excluded or neglected (n = 4) by the MDD before the specialised consultation. A total of 24 (17%) patients were advised to apply for occupational disease compensation, including 22 (15.6%) following the consultation. In addition, a diagnosis different from the one proposed by the MDD was proposed for 18/141 (12.8%) patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In our study, we found a high prevalence of occupational respiratory exposure with a potential causal link in patients with ILD. We suggest that a systematic specialised consultation in occupational medicine could be beneficial in the ILD diagnostic approach.