Exercise training for lung transplant candidates and recipients: a systematic review

Telehealth interventions to improve outcomes in lung transplant recipients: Primary results of the INSPIRE-III randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

There is growing evidence that many patients undergoing lung transplantation report significant distress and low physical activity (PA), which might not improve despite lung transplantation and may be associated with worse clinical outcomes. Few studies have attempted to improve psychological outcomes and functional capacity and PA after transplant.

METHODS

Investigational Study of Psychological Interventions in Recipients of Lung Transplant-III is a single-site, randomized clinical trial in which 180 post lung transplant patients, recruited between November 2019 and October 2023, completed a psychometric test battery to assess distress and functional capacity measured by the 6-Minute Walk Test and PA assessed by 7 consecutive days of continuous activity monitoring. Participants were then randomly assigned to either a 12-week Coping Skills Training and Exercise intervention (CSTEX) or a Standard of Care plus Education (SoC-ED) program delivered via telephone. Participants were then retested after completion of the telehealth interventions.

RESULTS

After 12 weeks, both intervention groups achieved small but similar improvements in distress and functional capacity. Although there were no between-group differences overall, patients who were considered clinically depressed at baseline and received CSTEX achieved greater improvements in depression compared to depressed patients who received SoC-ED.

CONCLUSIONS

Although patients in both CSTEX and SoC-ED showed only modest benefit from their respective interventions, a subgroup of patients in CSTEX who were depressed at study entry had greater reductions in depressive symptoms compared to SoC-ED. Depressive symptoms should be carefully monitored post-transplant and referred for treatment if symptoms persist.

TRIAL REGISTRY

NCT04093869.

Exploring the effects of pulmonary rehabilitation and its determinants in lung transplant candidates with cystic fibrosis

BACKGROUND/RATIONALE

Lung transplant (LTx) candidates with cystic fibrosis (CF) have ventilatory and musculoskeletal limitations and benefit from pulmonary rehabilitation (PR). Their training response has not been well characterized. The study aims to: 1) characterize the effect of outpatient PR and 2) evaluate the clinical characteristics associated with their PR response.

METHODS

Single-center retrospective cohort study of CF LTx candidates (July 2009-June 2019) with available pre-transplant exercise data, who participated in PR 2 to 3 times/week until transplantation. Demographics, CF-related characteristics, aerobic and muscle training volumes, and six-minute walk distance (6MWD) were characterized using descriptive statistics, paired t-tests and Spearman correlations to describe relationships between CF-related characteristics and training volumes.

RESULTS

In 86 CF LTx candidates (32 ± 10 years, 49 % males, FEV1: 23 ± 5 %; listing 6MWD 421 ± 89 m), the median PR time was 87 days (24-36 sessions). 78 % had at least one exacerbation and 55 % required hospitalization. 88 % used supplemental oxygen and 37 % required home non-invasive ventilation. Treadmill speed (1.7 ± 0.5 mph); biceps (50 IQR [40-70] lbs∗reps) and quadriceps (30 IQR [30-40] lbs∗reps) training volumes improved with PR (p < 0.05), whereas 6MWD remained unchanged. The presence of ≥1 respiratory exacerbation was associated with a lower progression in treadmill speed [-0.36 mph 95%CI (-0.67 to -0.04), p = 0.028].

CONCLUSION

CF LTx candidates participating in PR increased treadmill speed and muscle training volumes, with preservation of 6MWD. Respiratory exacerbations were prevalent and important determinants of aerobic training.

Establishment of emerging practices and research priorities for telerehabilitation in solid organ transplantation: meeting report and narrative literature review

Solid organ transplantation (SOT) is a life-saving procedure for those with end-stage organ dysfunction. The main goals of SOT are to improve quality of life and daily function, which are supported by pre- and post-transplant rehabilitation. In-person rehabilitation programs have traditionally been the standard-of-care for delivering rehabilitation for SOT patients. Many programs have adopted a virtual delivery model [telerehabilitation (TR)], an approach that has become increasingly used given restrictions to in-person delivery during the COVID-19 pandemic. Presently, TR programs are being used both clinically and in research with variable practices. A 2-day virtual meeting held in February 2023 brought together over 30 Canadian adult and pediatric researchers, clinicians, and patient and family partners across SOT. The meeting objectives were: (1) To facilitate knowledge exchange and dialogue in TR between patient partners, healthcare professionals, researchers, and key stakeholders, and (2) Identify gaps in clinical practice and research in TR. The discussion focused on delivery methods of TR, digital tools, facilitators and barriers of TR, and the effects of TR on physical and mental health in both adult and pediatric populations. This meeting report incorporates a narrative literature review of SOT and rehabilitation articles in the last 20 years. Future directions in TR are highlighted leading to the development of key research priorities targeted towards improved delivery of TR in SOT patients.

ECMO for bridging lung transplantation

BACKGROUND

With the shift in donor lung allocation from blood type and waiting order to the use of the lung allocation score (LAS) system, there are increasingly more cases of ECMO bridging lung transplantation. However, there are still some problems in case selection, implementation, and management.

METHODS

We analyzed and summarized a series of data on ECMO bridging lung transplantation through an extensive literature review.

RESULTS

The improvement of the lung transplant allocation system and the progress of ECMO technology have made the ECMO bridge to lung transplant more widely used in clinical practice. The selection of bridge patients is a crucial link in the success of transplantation, and accurate assessment of the patient before transplantation is necessary. The advantages and disadvantages of different bridge strategies exist, and the appropriate bridge strategy should be selected based on the patient's situation. Bleeding and thrombosis complications often occur during ECMO circulation, and there is currently no optimal anticoagulation strategy. The predictive score for bridge post-outcome is still subject to certain limitations.

CONCLUSIONS

ECMO bridging lung transplantation is suitable for patients waiting for lung transplantation when other respiratory support is ineffective or when hemodynamic instability occurs the disease is severe and the donor organ is easily obtainable. Patients aged 65 years or older, or have reversible multiple organ dysfunction should not be included as contraindications for ECMO bridging lung transplantation.

Respiratory rehabilitation techniques for patients with cystic fibrosis: a protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Cystic fibrosis (CF) is an autosomal recessive genetic disorder caused by mutations in the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene, primarily affecting the respiratory and digestive systems. Respiratory rehabilitation techniques play a crucial role in managing pulmonary symptoms and maintaining lung function in CF patients. Although various techniques have been developed and applied, there is currently no globally recognised optimal respiratory rehabilitation regimen. This study intends to conduct a network meta-analysis to comprehensively evaluate and compare the effectiveness of different respiratory rehabilitation techniques in CF patients.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The following key electronic bibliographic databases will be searched from inception to September 2024: Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CINAHL and Physiotherapy Evidence Database. We will include randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs that compare the efficacy of various respiratory rehabilitation techniques in CF patients, such as airway clearance techniques, exercise training and inspiratory muscle training. The primary outcomes will be lung function (forced expiratory volume in 1 s and forced vital capacity) and exercise capacity (VO2 max and 6 min walk test). Secondary outcomes will include quality of life, frequency of pulmonary exacerbations, hospitalisation rates and adverse events. If permitted, data will be synthesised using traditional pairwise meta-analysis and network meta-analysis, with the quality of evidence assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval will not be required for this protocol. The results of the final review will be disseminated via peer-reviewed journals and conference presentations.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42024574551.

Factors Influencing the Attrition Rate of a 10-Week Multimodal Rehabilitation Program in Patients After Lung Transplant: A Neural Network Analysis

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Despite the effectiveness of exercise and nutritional interventions to improve aerobic capacity and quality of life in lung transplant (LT) recipients, their compliance is low. Strategies to reduce the high attrition rate (participants lost over time) is a major challenge. Artificial neural networks (ANN) may assist in the early identification of patients with high risk of attrition. The main objective of this study is to evaluate the usefulness of ANNs to identify prognostic factors for high attrition rate of a 10-week rehabilitation program after a LT.

METHODS

This prospective observational study included first-time LT recipients over 18 years of age. The main outcome for each patient was the attrition rate, which was estimated by the amount of missing data accumulated during the study. Clinical variables including malnutrition, sarcopenia, and their individual components were assessed at baseline. An ANN and regression analysis were used to identify the factors determining a high attrition rate.

RESULTS

Of the 41 participants, 17 (41.4%) had a high rate of attrition in the rehabilitation program. Only 23 baseline variables had no missing data and were included in the analysis, from which a low age-dependent body mass index (BMI) was the most important conditioning factor for a high attrition rate (p = 7.08 × 10-5), followed by end-stage respiratory disease requiring PT (p = 0.000111), low health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) (p = 0.0009078), and low handgrip strength (p = 0.023).

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of high attrition rate in LT recipients is high. The profile of patients with a high probability of attrition includes those with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, low BMI and handgrip strength, and reduced HRQoL.

Cystic fibrosis foundation position paper: Redefining the cystic fibrosis care team

Interdisciplinary teams care for people with cystic fibrosis (pwCF) at specialized treatment centers. These teams have laid the foundation for the cystic fibrosis (CF) care model responsible for gains in health outcomes and quality of life within the CF community. However, the landscape of CF care is transforming, invigorated by new technologies, accessibility of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) therapies, and increased utilization of telemedicine. In light of these advances, it is appropriate to re-evaluate the CF care team structure. This position paper offers guidance for the structure of a CF care center designed to meet the evolving needs of the CF community. Fundamental to the proposed center structure is recognition of pwCF and their families as integral members of their care teams, underpinning the necessity for shared decision making, awareness of social determinants of health, and active partnership between all healthcare professionals involved in the care of pwCF.

Cardiac Comorbidity and Exercise Intolerance in Bilateral Lung Transplant Recipients Followed at a Pediatric Center

Reduced exercise capacity is common in young bilateral lung transplantation (Bi-LTx) recipients, but longer-term data on cardiac comorbidities are limited. We evaluate potential cardiac contributions to long-term exercise intolerance in this population. All Bi-LTx recipients at a single pediatric center, who completed routine clinical post-transplant cardiac assessment, including echocardiogram, cardiac exam, and cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET), were included. Cardiac risk factors (CRFs) were assessed by history and laboratory tests. CPET-derived peak and percent-predicted peak myocardial oxygen consumption (VO2 peak, ppVO2 peak) were used to quantitate exercise capacity. Percent-predicted peak oxygen pulse (pp peak O2 pulse) assessed stroke volume. 15 patients (67% M; median age 21.6 years, median follow-up from Bi-LTx 7.0 years) were included. Almost all patients (14, 93%) had multiple CRFs; hypertension and hyperlipidemia/dyslipidemia were the most common. On CPET, 93% (n = 14) had abnormal (≤ 85%) ppVO2 peak (median 59%). 73% (n = 11) had abnormal pp peak O2 pulse (median 74%). Ten had blunted heart rate response to exercise. Nine had left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LV-DD) on echocardiogram. Median percent-predicted forced expiratory volume in one second was 70%. One had severe chronic lung allograft dysfunction. Cardiac risk factors and exercise intolerance are common among young Bi-LTx recipients years post-transplant, even among those without significant pulmonary dysfunction. High prevalence of multiple CRFs, LV-DD, chronotropic dysfunction, and abnormal stroke volume suggest cardiac comorbidities may contribute to intolerance. Medical management of CRFs and tailored exercise may decrease cardiac risk and improve functional capacity for Bi-LTx survivors.

[Outcomes of respiratory rehabilitation program in lung transplant recipients: a quasi experimental study]

INTRODUCTION

Lung transplant (LT) is the ultimate option for end-stage lung diseases. Malnutrition and sarcopenia, common in LT recipients, can be reversible with adequate exercise and nutrition. This study aims to assess changes in physical performance and aerobic capacity after a 10-week rehabilitation program (RP) in LT recipients, as well as to describe the prevalence of sarcopenia and malnutrition before and after RP and their influence on clinically relevant outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Quasi-experimental study, before and after a 10-week PR in first-time TP recipients, aged over 18 years, from January 2022 to September 2023. Aerobic exercise capacity was assessed through the 6-minute walking test (6MWT) and peak oxygen consumption (VO2peak); and physical performance was measured using the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB). Additionally, the prevalence of sarcopenia was described according to the criteria of the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP2) and malnutrition according to the criteria of the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM).

RESULTS

Of the 41 patients, 56% had sarcopenia and 80% had malnutrition. After RP, the distance walked in the 6MWT increased by 66.3m (p=0.004) in men and 61m (p=0.001) in women. VO2peak increased in men by a mean of 3.1ml/min/kg (p=0.024). Physical performance improved significantly in both men and women according to the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), with clinically relevant differences of 1.6 pts (p<0.001) and 1.2 pts (p=0.012), respectively. The prevalence of sarcopenia decreased to 24% and malnutrition to 61%.

CONCLUSIONS

RP proved to be an effective and safe intervention for LT recipients. In addition to improvements in skeletal muscle strength and exercise capacity, a reduction in the prevalence of sarcopenia and malnutrition was also observed.

The Association Between Patient-Level Factors and Physical Function in Lung Transplant Recipients

Purpose

Despite the dramatic improvement in pulmonary function after lung transplantation, lung transplant recipients often have reduced physical function. The purpose of this study was to investigate the associations between physical function and a wide range of patient-level factors among lung transplant recipients to allow researchers and healthcare providers to identify and better understand contributors to poor physical function.

Methods

A cross-sectional study of lung transplant recipients enrolled in Lung Transplant Go (LTGO), a randomized, controlled trial evaluating the efficacy of a telerehabilitation behavioral exercise intervention on physical function. Data were collected at the time of study enrollment for physical function using 30-second sit-to-stand test (STS-30), and patient-level factors: discharge destination, time since transplant, hospital length of stay, participation in exercise program outside the study, comorbidities, psychological distress, and symptoms. Regression analysis was performed to identify the association between physical function and patient-level factors.

Results

A total of 72 lung transplant recipients with a mean age of 56 (13), 58% male, and 88% white, completed the STS-30. The bivariate analysis identified factors associated with STS-30, which are age, marital status, time since transplant, Questionnaire for Lung Transplant Patients' activity intolerance subscale, and psychological distress. Factors significantly predicted STS-30 using the regression analysis were age, time since transplant, and psychological distress (p< 0.05).

Conclusion

Age, time since lung transplantation, and psychological distress significantly predicted poor physical function. Interventions to prevent poor physical function post-lung transplantation should consider these factors. Research is needed to better understand patient-level factors on other physical function measures.

Effectiveness of pulmonary rehabilitation on exercise capacity in adult patients with lung transplantation: a systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis

Background

Lung transplantation (LTx) is a well-established option for patients in the end-stage of lung disease that is not responsive to other treatments. Although the survival rate after LTx has seen a significant increase, exercise tolerance is still limited and poses a big obstacle to recovery after LTx. Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is a comprehensive intervention that has many benefits for patients with chronic respiratory disease. However, the effectiveness of PR on adult patients with LTx is inconclusive. We performed this meta-analysis to assess the efficacy of PR in adult LTx recipients.

Methods

Eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-experimental studies published until March 25, 2024 were searched in MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science and CINAHL. Additionally, reference lists and published systematic reviews were scanned by manual searching. Studies selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment were conducted independently. Stata software (version 17.0) was utilized.

Results

There were 21 studies (9 RCTs and 12 quasi-experimental studies) were identified. Pooled analysis showed that PR positive effect in improving 6-minute walking distance (6MWD) [standard mean difference (SMD) =1.28, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.05-1.50, P<0.001], maximum oxygen consumption (VO2max) (SMD =0.42, 95% CI: 0.15-0.68, P=0.002), handgrip force (HGF) (SMD =0.49, 95% CI: 0.26-0.73, P<0.001), and quadriceps force (QF) (SMD =0.63, 95% CI: 0.45-0.82, P<0.001). There was no significant publication bias in those outcomes mentioned above.

Conclusions

PR shows evidence for being an effective adjunctive strategy for improving exercise capacity after LTx, but multi-center trials on larger populations are required to confirm its clinical benefits in the real-world setting.

The impact of time from ILD diagnosis to referral to the transplant center on the probability of inclusion in the transplant waiting list

BACKGROUND

Lung transplant is a therapeutic option for patients with progressive interstitial lung disease (ILD).

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to determine whether time from ILD diagnosis to referral to a transplant center influences the probability of being included in the transplant waiting list.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study including all ILD patients evaluated as lung transplantation (LT) candidates at a lung transplant center between 01/01/2017 and 31/12/2022. The primary endpoint was the probability of being included in the lung transplant waiting list according to the time elapsed from diagnosis to referral to the transplant center.

RESULTS

A total of 843 lung transplant requests were received, of which 367 (43.5%) were associated with ILD. Thirteen patients were excluded because they did not attend the first visit, whereas another 11 were excluded because some information was missing. As a result, our final sample was composed of 343 patients. The median time from diagnosis to referral was 29.4 (10.9 - 61.1) months. The overall probability of inclusion in the waiting list was 29.7%. By time from diagnosis to referral, the probability of inclusion in the waiting list was 48.1% for the patients referred 〈 6 months from diagnosis; 27.5% for patients referred 6 to 24 months from diagnosis; and 25.8% for patients referred 〉 24 months from diagnosis (p = 0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

Early referral to a lung transplant center seemed to increase the probability of being included in the lung transplant waiting list. Further research is needed in this topic.

Impact and timing of pulmonary rehabilitation in patients undergoing bronchoscopic lung volume reduction with endobronchial valves: A multicentre randomized controlled trial in patients with severe emphysema

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Both bronchoscopic lung volume reduction with endobronchial valves (BLVR-EBV) and pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) are effective treatments for improving exercise capacity and patient-reported outcomes in patients with severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). According to current recommendations, all BLVR-EBV patients should have undergone PR first. Our aim was to study the effects of PR both before and after BLVR-EBV compared to BLVR-EBV alone.

METHODS

We included patients with severe COPD who were eligible for BLVR-EBV and PR. Participants were randomized into three groups: PR before BLVR-EBV, PR after BLVR-EBV or BLVR-EBV without PR. The primary outcome was change in constant work rate cycle test (CWRT) endurance time at 6-month follow-up of the PR groups compared to BLVR-EBV alone. Secondary endpoints included changes in 6-minute walking test, daily step count, dyspnoea and health-related quality of life.

RESULTS

Ninety-seven participants were included. At 6-month follow-up, there was no difference in change in CWRT endurance time between the PR before BLVR-EBV and BLVR-EBV alone groups (median: 421 [IQR: 44; 1304] vs. 787 [123; 1024] seconds, p = 0.82) or in any of the secondary endpoints, but the PR after BLVR-EBV group exhibited a smaller improvement in CWRT endurance time (median: 107 [IQR: 2; 573], p = 0.04) and health-related quality of life compared to BLVR-EBV alone.

CONCLUSION

The addition of PR to BLVR-EBV did not result in increased exercise capacity, daily step count or improved patient-reported outcomes compared to BLVR-EBV alone, neither when PR was administered before BLVR-EBV nor when PR was administered after BLVR-EBV.

Influence of acute kidney injury and its recovery subtypes on patient-centered outcomes after lung transplantation

This study aimed to investigate the association between acute kidney injury (AKI) recovery subtypes and days alive out of hospital within the first 3 months (DAOH-90) in patients undergoing lung transplantation. Patients who underwent lung transplantation from January 2012 to December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed and stratified into three groups: no-AKI, early recovery AKI (within 7 days), and non-early recovery AKI group. AKI occurred in 86 (35%) of patients, of which 40 (16%) achieved early recovery, and the remaining 46 (19%) did not. The median DAOH-90 was 21 days shorter in the AKI than in the no-AKI (P = 0.002), and 29 days shorter in the non-early recovery AKI group than in the no-AKI group (P < 0.001). Non-early recovery AKI and preoperative tracheostomy status were independently associated with shorter DAOH-90. The prevalence of CKD (76%), and 1-year mortality (48%) were highest in the non-early recovery AKI group. Postoperative AKI was associated with an adverse patient-centered quality measure for perioperative care, and shorter DAOH-90. The non-early recovery AKI group exhibited the worst prognosis in terms of DAOH-90, CKD progression, and 1-year mortality, highlighting the important role of AKI and early-recovery AKI on both the quality of life and clinical outcomes after lung transplantation.

Rehabilitative goals for patients undergoing lung retransplantation

Lung retransplantation (LRT) involves a second or subsequent lung transplant (LT) in a patient whose first transplanted graft has failed. LRT is the only treatment option for irreversible lung allograft failure caused by acute graft failure, chronic lung allograft dysfunction, or postoperative complications of bronchial anastomosis. Prehabilitation (rehabilitation before LT), while patients are on the waiting list, is recognized as an essential component of the therapeutic regimen and should be offered throughout the waiting period from the moment of listing until transplantation. LRT is particularly fraught with challenges, and prehabilitation to reduce frailty is one of the few opportunities to address modifiable risk factors (such as functional and motor impairments) in a patient population in which there is clearly room to improve outcomes. Although rehabilitative outcomes and quality of life in patients receiving or awaiting LT have gained increased interest, there is a paucity of data on rehabilitation in patients undergoing LRT. Frailty is one of the few modifiable risk factors of retransplantation that is potentially preventable. As such, it is imperative that professionals involved in the field of retransplantation conduct research specifically exploring rehabilitative techniques and outcomes of value for patients receiving LRT, because this area remains unexplored.

The efficacy of pulmonary rehabilitation training program for patients after lung transplantation

Background

Pulmonary rehabilitation is recognized widely as one of the most effective measures to promote postoperative recovery of lung transplant recipients (LTRs), and it has positive effects on both short- and long-term quality of life (QoL) and survival outcomes. However, no standardized pulmonary rehabilitation training programs exist specifically for LTRs. The pulmonary rehabilitation programs widely used in clinical practice focus mainly on exercise or respiratory training, to some extent neglecting other therapeutic methods that could promote patient health, such as nutrition support, pain control, spiritual comfort, and so on. This study aimed to develop a postoperative pulmonary rehabilitation training program for LTRs and evaluate its effectiveness.

Methods

Using convenience sampling, all patients who underwent lung transplantation (LTx) at Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital from January 2021 to December 2022 were screened for inclusion and exclusion criteria, and a total of 68 patients were finally included in this study. A non-synchronous quasi-experimental design was used, with patients who underwent LTx in 2021 as the control group and patients who underwent LTx in 2022 as the experimental group. The control group received routine treatment, health education, and rehabilitation guidance when patients determined the date of surgery. In addition to this, the experimental group received pulmonary rehabilitation training. The incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications (pulmonary infections), duration of chest tube drainage, intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay, postoperative pain scores, postoperative QoL, pulmonary function, oxygenation index, and the distance in the 6-minute walking test (6MWD) were compared between the two groups.

Results

The length of ICU stay and duration of chest tube drainage in the experimental group were lower than those in the control group, and the results of oxygenation index, 6MWD, and St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (reflecting the QoL) were better than those of the control group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the pain of the two groups 1 week after surgery and 3 months after surgery, and the pain score of the experimental group was lower than that of the control group at 1 month after surgery (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of complications between the two groups (P>0.05).

Conclusions

The postoperative pulmonary rehabilitation training program for LTRs is safe and effective. It can shorten both the duration of chest tube drainage and ICU stay, it can also improve patients' exercise capacity and pulmonary function while also promote safety outcomes of LTRs, and improve QoL scores.

Impact of changes in skeletal muscle mass and quality during the waiting time on outcomes of lung transplantation

INTRODUCTION

The association of changes in skeletal muscle mass and quality during the waiting time with outcomes of lung transplantation (LT) remains unclear. We aimed to examine the association of changes in skeletal muscle mass and quality during the waiting time, as well as preoperative skeletal muscle mass and quality, with outcomes of LT.

METHODS

This study included individuals who underwent LT from brain-dead donors. Skeletal muscle mass (cm2 /m2 ) and quality (mean Hounsfield units [HU]) of the erector spinae muscle at the 12th thoracic level were evaluated using computed tomography. Preoperative skeletal muscle mass and quality, and their changes during the waiting time were calculated. We evaluated the associations among mechanical ventilation (MV) duration, intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS), hospital LOS, 6-minute walk distance at discharge, and 5-year survival after LT.

RESULTS

This study included 98 patients. The median waiting time was 594.5 days (interquartile range [IQR], 355.0-913.0). The median changes in skeletal muscle mass and quality were -4.4% (IQR, -13.3-3.1) and -2.9% (IQR, -16.0-4.1), respectively. Severe low skeletal muscle mass at LT was associated with prolonged ICU LOS (B = 8.46, 95% confidence interval [CI]: .51-16.42) and hospital LOS (B = 36.00, 95% CI: 3.23-68.78). Pronounced decrease in skeletal muscle mass during the waiting time was associated with prolonged MV duration (B = 7.85, 95% CI: .89-14.81) and ICU LOS (B = 7.97, 95% CI: .83-15.10).

CONCLUSION

Maintaining or increasing skeletal muscle mass during the waiting time would be beneficial to improve the short-term outcomes of LT.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy of exercise intervention in kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

There is uncertainty about the beneficial effects of exercise intervention for kidney transplant recipients. The purpose of our meta-analysis is to estimate the efficacy of exercise intervention in kidney transplant recipients.

METHODS

A database search according to the PICOS framework was performed for all published randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials (RCTs) about exercise intervention for kidney transplant recipients. The databases involved include PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library.

RESULTS

A total of 16 RCTs (involving 827 patients) in compliance with inclusion criteria were included in our study. The results demonstrated that adequate exercise intervention improved statistically in creatinine clearance [mean difference (MD) =  - 0.29, 95% confidence interval (CI) - 0.46 to - 0.11, p = 0.001], serum urea (MD = - 21.57, 95% CI - 35.84 to - 7.29, p = 0.003), VO2 peak (MD = 3.20, 95% CI 1.97-4.43, p < 0.00001), high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C) (MD = 0.21, 95% CI 0.04-0.37, p = 0.01), 60-s sit to stand test (60-STS) (MD = 14.47, 95% CI 8.89-20.04, p < 0.00001), 6-min walk distance (6-MWD) (MD = 91.87, 95% CI 38.34-145.39, p = 0.0008), and 6-min walk test (6-MWT) (MD = 44.08, 95% CI 20.30-67.87, p = 0.0003) of patients after kidney transplantation. No between-groups differences (p > 0.05) were observed for anthropometric characteristics, body composition, serum cytokine levels, and quality of life short form-36 questionnaire (SF-36).

CONCLUSIONS

In kidney transplant recipients, appropriate exercise intervention improved renal function, cardiopulmonary function, physical performance.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The PROSPERO registration number is CRD42022357574.

Lung Transplantation for Pulmonary Artery Hypertension

This manuscript discusses the role of lung transplantation in patients with pulmonary hypertension. The indications and timing for referral to a transplant unit and timing for wait-listing for lung transplantation are discussed. The type of transplantation—isolated (single or double) lung transplantation and situations when combined heart and double lung transplantation is indicated—will be elaborated. Escalation of medical therapy with the need and timing for bridging therapies such as extracorporeal membrane oxygenation until an appropriate organ becomes available will be discussed. Challenges in the postoperative period, specific to lung transplantation for pulmonary artery hypertension, will be reviewed. The outcomes following lung transplantation will also be considered in greater detail.

Handgrip Strength in Lung Transplant Candidates and Recipients

OBJECTIVES

Handgrip strength is increasingly used to assess muscle strength in various conditions. In this review, we investigated handgrip strength in patients receiving or awaiting lung transplant.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

For this integrative review, we searched 8 databases from inception through February 2023. Two keyword entries, "handgrip strength" and "lung transplantation," were matched using the Boolean operator, AND. No filters were applied for document type, age, sex, publication date, language, and subject.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

The searched databases returned 73 citations. Nine articles considering 487 patients (49% female) were included in the final analysis; 7 studies were observational, and 2 were randomized controlled trials. In 7 of 9 studies, handgrip strength was measured with a hydraulic dynamometer. In candidates for lung transplant, handgrip strength ranged from 27.1 kg (before rehabilitation) to 31.2 kg (after rehabilitation). In lung transplant recipients, handgrip strength ranged from 21.1 kg (before rehabilitation) to 35.7 kg (after rehabilitation). Handgrip strength in lung transplant candidates with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease was higher (89 ± 18% predicted) versus patients with interstitial lung disease (79 ± 18% predicted). Improvements in maximal inspiratory pressure and maximal expiratory pressure were observed in those patients whose handgrip strength improved after rehabilitation. Nonsarcopenic patients walked longer distances for the 6-minute walking test (>450 m) versus sarcopenic patients (<310 m) and had higher handgrip strength (>20 kg) versus sarcopenic patients (<20 kg). Handgrip strength testing should be implemented both in preoperative and postoperative contexts to evaluate physical potential of patients and drive rehabilitative activities toward the most impaired domains.

Design of Lung Transplant Go (LTGO): A randomized controlled trial evaluating the efficacy of a telerehabilitation behavioral exercise intervention to improve physical activity, physical function, and blood pressure control after lung transplantation

Background

Lung transplantation is an established treatment option for persons with advanced lung disease. After transplantation, lung function typically returns to near normal levels, however exercise capacity remains low due to chronic deconditioning, limited physical function, and inactive lifestyles which undermine the intended benefits of the highly selective, resource-intensive transplant procedure. Pulmonary rehabilitation is recommended to improve fitness and activity tolerance, however due to multiple barriers, lung transplant recipients either never participate, or fail to complete, pulmonary rehabilitation programs.

Purpose

To describe the design of Lung Transplant Go (LTGO), a trial modified for the remote environment based on recommendations to preserve trial integrity during COVID. The aims are to evaluate a behavioral exercise intervention to improve physical function, physical activity, and blood pressure control in lung transplant recipients conducted safely and effectively using a telerehabilitation (telerehab) platform, and to explore the role of potential mediators and moderators of the relationship between LTGO and outcomes.

Methods

Single-site, 2-group randomized controlled trial with lung transplant recipients randomized 1:1 to either the LTGO intervention (a 2-phased, supervised, telerehab behavioral exercise program), or to enhanced usual care (activity tracking and monthly newsletters). All study activities, including intervention delivery, recruitment, consenting, assessment, and data collection, will be performed remotely.

Conclusion

If efficacious, this fully scalable and replicable telerehab intervention could be efficiently translated to reach large numbers of lung recipients to improve and sustain self-management of exercise habits by overcoming barriers to participation in existing, in-person pulmonary rehabilitation programs.

Movement therapy in lung transplantation candidates assisted by a lightweight wearable robot

The aim of this pilot-study was to investigate the safety, feasibility and tolerability of an assisted mobilization of patients with advanced pulmonary diseases, using a lightweight, exoskeleton-type robot (Myosuit, MyoSwiss AG, Zurich, Switzerland). Ten patients performed activities of daily life (ADL) both with and without the device. The mean age was 53.6 (±5.6) years; 70% were male. The assessment of outcome included the evaluation of vital signs, adverse events, rates of perceived exertion and dyspnea (PRE, PRD), the ability to perform ADL and the individual acceptability. Robotic-assisted mobilization was feasible in all patients. No adverse events occurred. RPE and RPD showed no significant difference with or without the Myosuit (mean difference in RPE -1.7, 95%-confidence interval (CI) -1.16, 4.49; p = 0.211; mean difference in RPD 0.00, 95%-CI -1.88, 1.88; p = 0.475). 80% of patients were interested to participate in a robotic-assisted training on a regular basis. A robotic exoskeleton-assisted mobilization is safe, feasible, well-tolerated and well-accepted. The results are highly encouraging to further pursue this highly innovative approach.

Identifying Outcome Domains for Clinical Trials of Physical Rehabilitation Among Adults Undergoing Solid Organ Transplantation Using a Delphi Approach

Introduction: A core outcome set (COS) improves the quality of reporting in clinical trials; however, this has not been developed for clinical trials of exercise training among adults undergoing solid organ transplant. Research Question: To explore the perspectives of transplant patients and healthcare professionals on the key outcomes domains that are relevant for clinical trials of exercise in all recipients of transplanted organs. Methods: A Delphi approach was employed with 2 rounds of online questionnaires. Participants rated the importance of outcome domains using a 9-point Likert scale ranging from "not important" to "very important". A score of 7 to 9 (very important) by 70% or more participants and a score of 1 to 3 (not important) by less than 15% participants were required to keep an outcome domain from the first to the second round. Results: Thirty-six participants completed 2 rounds of questionnaires (90% response rate). After Round 1, 8 outcome domains were considered very important in the pretransplant phase; 16 in the early posttransplant; and 17 in the late posttransplant. Only 1 outcome domain, organ rejection in the early posttransplant phase, met the criteria to be considered very important after Round 2. Conclusion: Although consensus was not reached on the core outcome domains, this study provides preliminary information on which domains are higher priority for patients and professionals. Future work should consider a meeting with key stakeholders to allow for deeper discussion to reach consensus on a core outcome set.

Lung Transplant Rehabilitation-A Review

BACKGROUND

Both lung transplant recipients and candidates are characterised by reduced training capacity and low average quality of life (QoL). This review investigates the impact of training on exercise ability and QoL in patients before and after lung transplant.

METHODS

Searches were conducted from the beginning to 7 March 2022 using the terms "exercise," "rehabilitation," "lung transplant," "exercise ability," "survival," "quality of life" and "telerehabilitation" in six databases, including Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), PubMed, CINAHL, Nursing and Allied Health, and Scopus. The inclusion criteria were studies evaluating the effects of an exercise training programme concurrent with lung transplantation as well as patients and candidates (>18 years old) through any lung diseases. The term "lung transplant rehabilitation" was used to refer to all carefully thought-out physical activities with the ultimate or intermediate objective of improving or maintaining physical health.

RESULTS

Out of 1422 articles, 10 clinical- and 3 telerehabilitation studies, candidates (n = 420) and recipients (n = 116) were related to the criteria and included in this review. The main outcome significantly improved in all studies. The 6-min walk distance, maximum exercise capacity, peak oxygen uptake, or endurance for constant load rate cycling improved measuring physical activity [aerobic exercises, breathing training, and aerobic and inspiratory muscle training sessions (IMT)]. Overall scores for dyspnoea improved after exercise training. Furthermore, health-related quality of life (HRQOL) also improved after aerobic exercise training, which was performed unsupervised or accompanied by breathing sessions. Aerobic training alone rather than combined with inspiratory muscle- (IMT) or breathing training enhanced exercise capacity.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, rehabilitation programmes seem to be beneficial to patients both preceding and following lung transplantation. More studies are required to determine the best training settings in terms of time scale, frequency, and work intensity in terms of improving exercise ability, dyspnoea, and HRQOL.

Time Trends in Clinical Characteristics and Hospital Outcomes of Hospitalizations for Lung Transplantation in COPD Patients in Spain from 2016 to 2020-Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic

(1) Background: To examine the clinical characteristics and hospital outcomes of hospitalization for lung transplantation in COPD patients in Spain from 2016 to 2020; and to assess if the COVID-19 pandemic has affected the number or the outcomes of lung transplantations in these patients. (2) Methods: We used the Spanish National Hospital Discharge Database to select subjects who had a code for COPD (ICD-10: J44) and had undergone a lung transplantation (ICD-10 codes OBYxxxx). (3) Results: During the study period, 704 lung transplants were performed among COPD patients (single 31.68%, bilateral 68.32%). The absolute number of transplants increased with raising rates of 8%, 14% and 19% annually from 2016 to 2019. However, a marked decrease of -18% was observed from 2019 to year 2020. Overall, 47.44% of the patients suffered at least one complication, being the most frequent lung transplant rejection (24.15%), followed by lung transplant infection (13.35%). The median length of hospital stay (LOHS) was 33 days and the in-hospital-mortality (IHM) was 9.94%. Variables associated with increased risk of mortality were a Comorbidity Charlson Index ≥ 1 (OR 1.82; 95%CI 1.08-3.05) and suffering any complication of the lung transplantation (OR 2.14; 95%CI 1.27-3.6). COPD patients in 2020 had a CCI ≥ 1 in a lower proportion than 2019 patients (29.37 vs. 38.51%; p = 0.015) and less frequently suffered any complications after the lung transplantation (41.26 vs. 54.6%; p = 0.013), no changes in the LOHS or the IHM were detected from 2019 to 2020. (4) Conclusions: Our study showed a constant increase in the number of lung transplantations from 2016 to 2019 in COPD patients, with a drop from 2019 to 2020, probably related to the COVID-19 pandemic. However, no changes in LOHS or IHM were detected over time.

Exercise Progression Protocol for Lung Transplant GO: A Multicomponent Telerehab Exercise Intervention for Patients After Lung Transplantation

Lung transplantation is one of the fastest growing solid organ transplant procedures in the United States. After transplantation, lung function typically returns to near normal levels; however, reduced physical function and an inactive lifestyle compromise this benefit. To promote rehabilitation goals, lung transplant recipients (LTRs) are advised to participate in pulmonary rehab, but participation is low due to barriers related to scheduling, travel requirements, lack of insurance coverage, and the concern about exposure to infection. Telerehabilitation offers a flexible alternative with the potential to promote self-management of exercise in LTRs. The purpose of this report was to describe the exercise progression protocol for the Lung Transplant GO multicomponent telerehab exercise intervention for patients after lung transplantation. The progression protocol is an evidence-informed exercise protocol designed to improve physical function and physical activity in LTRs safely and effectively in a remote environment. The protocol standardizes the prescription of exercise while permitting adaptation of the program to meet the needs of the individual. Using this model, the decisions about program progression are systematic, transparent, and replicable to other LTRs.

Early Change in Lower Limb Strength and Function in Lung Transplant Patients After Center-Based and Telerehabilitation

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to examine the change and relationship among quadriceps torque (QT) and physical function in adult lung transplant (LTx) patients undergoing rehabilitation.

METHODS

A prospective study assessed 6-min walk test (6MWT) distance, QT, and Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) at the start of pre-habilitation and 10-12 wk post-LTx. Functional outcomes were examined for within-group differences for participants who completed center-based rehabilitation between September 2019 and March 2020 and participants who completed telerehabilitation ("telerehab") between March 2020 and June 2021 during COVID-19. Relationships between QT, SPPB, and 6MWT were examined pre- and post-LTx.

RESULTS

A total of 49 LTx recipients were included (30 men, 61 [56-67] yr, 26 center-based rehab, and 23 telerehab). The 6MWT increased (median 75 m: 95% CI, 35 - 117, P < .0001), and the telerehab group showed an LTx decrease in QT (-9.6 Nm: 95% CI, -29 to -2.3, P = .02) and an increased gait speed (0.21 m/sec: 95% CI, 0.11 - 0.47, P < .0001). Pre-LTx QT showed a moderate correlation to pre-LTx SPPB ( r = 0.41, P = .004) and weak correlations to gait speed and 6MWT ( r ranging from 0.21 to 0.35, P < .05). Post-LTx QT showed moderate correlations to post-LTx SPPB ( r = 0.43, P = .002), gait speed ( r = 0.54, P < .001), five-time sit-to-stand ( r =-0.57, P < .0001), and 6MWT ( r = 0.62, P < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Early post-LTx 6MWT and gait speed increased with no improvement in QT or other SPPB components. Correlations between QT and measures of exercise capacity and lower limb function were stronger post-LTx. Serial measurements may further inform functional trajectories and rehabilitation models.

Disseminating education to solid organ transplant recipients to promote engagement in physical activity

Objective

To evaluate the dissemination of education through a workshop to promote engagement in physical activity (PA) among solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients.

Methods

The in-person workshop consisted of expert-led lectures on topics related to physical activity (day 1) and sports and fitness training with volunteer coaches (day 2). There were separate streams for children/adolescents and adults. RE-AIM (Reach, Efficacy, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance) framework was used to evaluate the impact of the workshop. Presenters and participants completed evaluations of the workshop using a 5-point Likert scale. A subgroup of adults completed a self-reported PA questionnaire at baseline and 4-weeks after the workshop.

Results

103 individuals (71 SOT recipients, 32 caregivers) attended the workshop (ages 4 to 71+ years). Sessions were highly rated (median = 5) for both quality and content on both days. There was no significant change (p = 0.16) in PA. However, 56% of SOT recipients reported changing their level of PA.

Conclusion

An educational-workshop with hands-on training was an efficient and well-received method for disseminating awareness about the benefits of PA in SOT recipients.

Innovation

Dissemination of evidence-based knowledge through a novel educational-workshop in a real-world setting has the potential to inform the decisions about PA behavior among SOT recipients.

Feasibility and acceptability of a physical activity behavioural modification tele-coaching intervention in lung transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Despite improvements in pulmonary function following lung transplantation (LTx), physical activity levels remain significantly lower than the general population. To date, there is little research investigating interventions to improve daily physical activity in LTx recipients. This study assessed the feasibility and acceptability of a novel, 12-weeks physical activity tele-coaching (TC) intervention in LTx recipients.

METHODS

Lung transplant recipients within 2 months of hospital discharge were recruited and randomised (1:1) to TC or usual care (UC). TC consists of a pedometer and smartphone app, allowing transmission of activity data to a platform that provides feedback, activity goals, education, and contact with the researcher as required. Recruitment and retention, occurrence of adverse events, intervention acceptability and usage were used to assess feasibility.

RESULTS

Key criteria for progressing to a larger study were met. Of the 15 patients eligible, 14 were recruited and randomised to TC or UC and 12 completed (67% male; mean ± SD age; 58 ± 7 years; COPD n = 4, ILD n = 6, CF n = 1, PH n = 1): TC (n = 7) and UC (n = 5). TC was well accepted by patients, with 86% indicating that they enjoyed taking part. Usage of the pedometer was excellent, with all patients wearing it for over 90% of days and rating the pedometer and telephone contact as the most vital aspects. There were no adverse events related to the intervention. After 12 weeks, only TC displayed improvements in accelerometry steps/day (by 3475 ± 3422; p = .036) and movement intensity (by 153 ± 166 VMU; p = .019), whereas both TC and UC groups exhibited clinically important changes in physical SF-36 scores (by 11 ± 14 and 7 ± 9 points, respectively).

CONCLUSION

TC appears to be a feasible, safe, and well-accepted intervention in LTx.

Interdisciplinary Management for the First Patient With Post-COVID Double-Lung Transplantation in Inpatient Rehabilitation in the United States: A Case Report

OBJECTIVE

In the setting of the COVID-19 pandemic, lung transplantation is being used as a life-saving treatment. This case report describes the rehabilitation course of the first documented individual in the United States post bilateral lung transplant for COVID-19.

METHODS (CASE DESCRIPTION)

The patient is a 28-year-old woman who was previously healthy and who failed all other life-saving medical interventions before undergoing bilateral lung transplantation, resulting in an extended hospital stay and significant physical debility.

RESULTS

Through an interdisciplinary rehabilitation approach, the patient was able to achieve functional improvements in strength, balance, endurance, and functional mobility to safely discharge home.

CONCLUSION

Research is needed regarding optimal treatment of this patient population because lung transplantation continues to be used for long-term medical management of COVID-19 infection.

IMPACT

This is a case report describing rehabilitation for the first documented individual in the United States post bilateral lung transplant for COVID-19.

Awakening in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation as a bridge to lung transplantation

Although the rate of lung transplantation (LTx), the last treatment option for end-stage lung disease, is increasing, some patients waiting for LTx need a bridging strategy for LTx due to the limited number of available donor lungs. For a long time, mechanical ventilation has been employed as a bridge to LTx because the outcome of using extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) as a bridging strategy has been poor. However, the outcome after mechanical ventilation as a bridge to LTx was poor compared with that in patients without bridges. With advances in technology and the accumulation of experience, the outcome of ECMO as a bridge to LTx has improved, and the rate of ECMO use as a bridging strategy has increased over time. However, whether the use of ECMO as a bridge to LTx can achieve survival rates similar to those of non-bridged LTx patients remains controversial. In 2010, one center introduced awake ECMO strategy for LTx bridging, and its use as a bridge to LTx has been showing favorable outcomes to date. Awake ECMO has several advantages, such as maintenance of physical activity, spontaneous breathing, avoidance of endotracheal intubation, and reduced use of sedatives and analgesics, but it may cause serious problems. Nonetheless, several studies have shown that awake ECMO performed by a multidisciplinary team is safe. In cases where ECMO or mechanical ventilation is required due to unavoidable exacerbation in patients awaiting LTx, the application of awake ECMO performed by an appropriately trained ECMO multi-disciplinary team can be useful.

Addressing the changing rehabilitation needs of patients undergoing thoracic surgery

The rehabilitation needs of individuals undergoing thoracic surgery are changing, especially as surgical management is increasingly being offered to patients who are at risk of developing functional limitations during and after hospital discharge. In the past rehabilitative management of these patients was frequently limited to specific respiratory physiotherapy interventions in the immediate postoperative setting with the aim to prevent postoperative pulmonary complications. In the past two decades, this focus has shifted toward pulmonary rehabilitation interventions that aim to improve functional status of individuals, both in the pre- and (longer-term) postoperative period. While there is increased interest in (p)rehabilitation interventions the majority of thoracic surgery patients are however currently on their own with respect to progression of their exercise and physical activity regimens after they have been discharged from hospital. There are also no formal guidelines supporting the referral of these patients to outpatient rehabilitation programs. The current evidence regarding rehabilitation interventions initiated before, during, and after the hospitalization period will be briefly reviewed with special focus on patients undergoing surgery for lung cancer treatment and patients undergoing lung transplantation. More research will be necessary in the coming years to modify or change clinical rehabilitation practice beyond the acute admission phase in patients undergoing thoracic surgery. Tele rehabilitation or web-based activity counseling programs might also be interesting emerging alternatives in the (long-term) postoperative rehabilitative treatment of these patients.