Neuropsychiatric events associated with montelukast in patients with asthma: a systematic review

Association and mechanism of montelukast on sleep disorders: insights from NHANES 2005-2018 data analysis and a network pharmacology study

BACKGROUND

Studies have suggested associations between montelukast and increased risks of sleep disorders, including overall sleeping problems and insomnia. However, the results of observational studies are not consistent. Understanding these associations is crucial, particularly in patients solely diagnosed with allergic rhinitis, where montelukast use remains prevalent.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess whether montelukast exposure is associated with sleep disorders and elucidate the possible molecular mechanism.

METHOD

We conducted a cross-sectional study of 16,520 adults from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2005-2018. Multivariable regression was used to evaluate the association between montelukast exposure and sleep disorder. Network pharmacology was conducted to identify the mechanisms of montelukast on sleep disorders.

RESULTS

Montelukast exposure had a higher prevalence of sleep disorders (25.28%). In a multivariable logistic regression model adjusted for sociodemographic, behavioral, and health characteristics, montelukast exposure was associated with sleep disorders (odds ratio [OR]: 1.72; confidence interval [CI]: 1.32-2.26). Network pharmacology was identified 39 intersection targets and 17 core targets of montelukast on sleep disorders. The Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) enrichment analysis suggested montelukast mainly works through multiple pathways in chemical carcinogenesis-receptor activation, cancer, estrogen signaling pathway, etc.

CONCLUSIONS

The study implies a potential positive association between long-term montelukast exposure and sleep disorders through multi-faceted mechanisms. It is suggested that attention be given to the possibility of sleep disorders in patients undergoing prolonged montelukast therapy.

Comparison of ICS dose reduction vs. montelukast discontinuation for step-down therapy in well-controlled asthma: a pilot randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

While asthma guidelines advocate for reducing inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) doses in well-controlled patients, limited evidence exists to directly support this approach. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of ICS dose reduction versus montelukast discontinuation as step-down strategies in adults with well-controlled asthma.

METHODS

This single-center, pilot randomized controlled trial enrolled 73 adults with well-controlled asthma. Participants were randomized to either Group A: ICS Dose Reduction (n = 37) or Group B: Montelukast Discontinuation (n = 36). Both groups received standard care and their designated intervention for three months. The primary outcome was asthma control measured by the ACT score. Secondary outcomes included lung function, asthma exacerbation frequency, treatment failure rates, and cough symptoms. Medication adherence was assessed using dose counters and pill counts.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in overall asthma control between the groups, as measured by the ACT score (p = 0.42). However, patients in Group A (reduced ICS) experienced significantly fewer treatment failures compared to Group B (discontinued montelukast) at three months (p = 0.01). No serious adverse events were reported.

CONCLUSION

Although the ACT scores did not significantly differ between the groups, we did observe a trend towards fewer treatment failures in the ICS reduction group. This suggests that reducing ICS doses may help to maintain asthma control and reduce the risk of exacerbations. However, further research is warranted to confirm these findings in larger, long-term studies.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

IRCT Registration Number IRCT2016052428037N1, Retrospectively registered, Registration Date 20,160,701.

Comparative Risk of Neuropsychiatric Adverse Events Associated With Leukotriene-Receptor Antagonists Versus Inhaled Corticosteroids

BACKGROUND

Leukotriene-receptor antagonists (LTRA) and inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are common controller medications for asthma, but limited studies examine their comparative risks on neuropsychiatric adverse events (NAEs) in patients with asthma.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the comparative risks of LTRA versus ICS on 7 distinct categories of NAEs in patients with asthma at a nationwide level.

METHODS

We conducted a nationwide cohort study during 2010-2021. Incident NAEs and their clinical subgroups (eg, psychotic disorders, anxiety disorders, movement disorders, behavioral and emotional disorders, mood disorders, sleep-related disorders, and personality disorders) were assessed. Cox proportional hazards regressions were used to quantify the comparative risks.

RESULTS

There were 1,249,897 patients with asthma aged 6 to 64 years. Incidence rates for NAEs were 25.10 per 1000 person-years among patients treated with LTRA and 23.46 per 1000 person-years among those treated with ICS. The incidence rate difference was 1.64 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.30-2.98) per 1000 person-years. Positive associations of NAEs and 3 clinical subgroups were found in patients treated with LTRA compared with ICS (hazard ratios [HR]: 1.06 [95% CI: 1.00-1.12] for NAEs; HR: 1.88 [95% CI: 1.24-2.84] for psychotic disorders; HR: 1.10 [95% CI: 1.01-1.20] for anxiety disorders; and HR: 1.27 [95% CI: 1.02-1.58] for behavioral and emotional disorders), but not for movement disorders, mood disorders, sleep-related disorders, and personality disorders.

CONCLUSIONS

This nationwide cohort study identified heightened risks, ranging from 6% to 88%, of NAEs and 3 clinical subgroups in patients with asthma treated with LTRA compared with ICS. These findings underscore the necessity for clinicians to communicate with patients regarding potential neuropsychiatric harms when prescribing LTRA.

Montelukast Use and the Risk of Neuropsychiatric Adverse Events in Children

Importance

Spontaneous reports have indicated that montelukast increases the risk of neuropsychiatric adverse events, and the US Food and Drug Administration added a boxed warning about these risks in 2020. However, the potential mechanism is not well understood, and the observational evidence is scarce, particularly in children.

Objective

To assess the potential association between the use of montelukast and the risk of neuropsychiatric adverse events in children and adolescents.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This nationwide register-based cohort study used data from Sweden from January 1, 2007, to November 30, 2021. Participants included children aged 6 to 17 years who used montelukast and long-acting β-agonists (LABA). Data analysis was performed from December 2023 to April 2024.

Exposure

Montelukast vs LABA.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome, any neuropsychiatric adverse event, was a composite of secondary outcomes, including anxiety; depression; sleep-related disorders; suicide and suicidal actions; disrupted control of activity, attention, and behavior; and confusion and psychotic-like symptoms. Outcomes were defined on the basis of diagnosis codes and dispensings of prescription drugs for specific neuropsychiatric symptoms. Patients were followed up from drug initiation to discontinuation, and treatment and censoring weights were used to adjust for potential confounding on baseline and selection bias from informative censoring. Pooled logistic regression was used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs).

Results

The final cohort included 74 291 children (mean [SD] age, 12.3 [3.3] years; 35 446 female [47.7%]); 26 462 used montelukast and 47 829 used LABA. During a mean (SD) follow-up of 5.8 (3.2) months, 310 neuropsychiatric adverse events in the montelukast patients and 566 events in the LABA patients were identified. In the weighted cohort, the incidence rates of neuropsychiatric adverse events were 2.39 per 100 patient-years among the montelukast users and 2.41 per 100 patient-years among the LABA users. This translated to a weighted HR of 0.99 (95% CI, 0.84-1.16). No substantial differences were observed between the montelukast and LABA patients when analyzing the risk of specific neuropsychiatric adverse events: the HRs were 0.79 (95% CI, 0.54-1.14) for anxiety; 1.16 (95% CI, 0.70-1.95) for depression; 0.93 (95% CI, 0.76-1.13) for sleep-related disorders; 1.31 (95% CI, 0.64-2.69) for suicide and suicidal actions; 1.27 (95% CI, 0.84-1.90) for disrupted control of activity, attention, and behavior; and 0.51 (95% CI, 0.05-5.53) for confusion and psychotic-like symptoms. The risk of the primary outcome was consistent over subgroups and a range of sensitivity analyses.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this large study of children and adolescents based on data from routine clinical practice, there was no association between use of montelukast and the risk of neuropsychiatric adverse events. In aggregation with other robust observational studies, these results can inform the management of asthma and allergic rhinitis in this patient group.

Rhinitis in the Geriatric Population: Epidemiological and Cytological Aspects

Allergic rhinitis (AR), traditionally considered as a childhood condition, is increasingly recognized among older adults, driven by rising life expectancy and environmental factors. Although allergic sensitization declines with age, AR prevalence in the elderly is underestimated, with 3-12% of geriatric patients affected. Diagnosis is challenging due to nonspecific symptoms and overlapping conditions, leading to underdiagnosis and inadequate treatment. AR significantly impacts the quality of life (QoL), often exacerbating respiratory comorbidities like asthma and COPD. Presbynasalis, encompassing age-related sinonasal changes, includes reduced allergic responses, increased chronic rhinosinusitis, altered nasal structure, and impaired mucociliary clearance. Non-allergic rhinitis, atrophic rhinitis, and overlapping rhinitis further complicate AR diagnosis in the elderly. Effective management involves personalized pharmacotherapy, allergen-specific immunotherapy (AIT), and addressing comorbidities and polypharmacy risks. Despite safety concerns, recent studies demonstrate AIT efficacy in elderly patients, reducing symptoms and medication use. Given AR's impact on cognitive and respiratory health, accurate diagnosis and treatment can enhance QoL and mitigate health decline. Greater awareness and further research are essential to understand AR prevalence and improve outcomes for geriatric patients.

Neuropsychiatric diagnoses after montelukast initiation in paediatric patients with asthma

BACKGROUND

The evidence base on montelukast-associated adverse outcomes is inconclusive in children and young persons (CYP) with asthma. We aimed to investigate 1-year incidence of neuropsychiatric diagnoses after initiation of montelukast as an adjunct therapy to inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) in CYP aged 3-17 years with asthma.

METHODS

This propensity score matched cohort study was conducted using electronic health records between 2015 and 2019 in the TriNetX Analytics Network patient repository in the USA. Neuropsychiatric diagnoses were identified using the International Statistical Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) codes. We estimated risk ratios (RRs), absolute risk increase (ARI) and number needed to harm (NNH) with 95% CIs.

FINDINGS

The mean age (SD) at index prescription in the 107 384 CYP with asthma was 8.7 (4.0) years (93 461 (87%) mild to moderate asthma; 62 301 (58%) male; 53 485 (50%) white; 33 107 (31%) black/African American). Montelukast was associated with excess incidence of any neuropsychiatric outcome (71 per 1000 persons with montelukast and 54 per 1000 persons with no montelukast; RR 1.32 (95% CI 1.25 to 1.39); ARI per 100 persons, 1.71 (95% CI 1.44 to 1.98); 1-year NNH, 58 patients (95% CI 51 to 69)). The highest excess risk in the montelukast group was for sleep disorders (RR 1.63 (95% CI 1.50 to 1.77); ARI per 100 persons 1.17 (95% CI 1.00 to 1.33); NNH, 85 patients (95% CI 75 to 100)). Montelukast use was also associated with excess incidence of anxiety disorders (RR 1.16 (95% CI 1.08 to 1.24)) and mood disorders (RR 1.16 (95% CI 1.05 to 1.29)).

CONCLUSIONS

In CYP with asthma who were treated with ICSs, adjunct treatment with montelukast was associated with a higher incidence of neuropsychiatric outcomes compared with those who were not exposed to montelukast.

Montelukast deprescribing in outpatient specialty clinics: A single center cross-sectional study

Objective

To identify and evaluate montelukast deprescribing in outpatient specialty clinics.

Methods

This was a single-center, retrospective, cross-sectional study conducted at an academic health system in the southern US including 21 specialty clinics. Subjects included adults ≥18 years with an active prescription for montelukast who attended at least one appointment in pulmonology, otolaryngology, or neurology outpatient specialty clinics between January 1, 2021 to December 31, 2022. Patients <18 years and those with diagnoses of uncontrolled asthma or allergic rhinitis were excluded. Outcomes assessed included the frequency and period prevalence of montelukast deprescribing, defined by a documented montelukast discontinuation within the medical record, and evaluation of reasoning for discontinuation mentioned in visit notes.

Results

There were 1152 patients who met inclusion criteria. Of these, 43 (3.7 %) experienced a montelukast deprescribing event: 18 (41.9 %) in neurology, 13 (30.2 %) in otolaryngology, and 12 (27.9 %) in pulmonology. Documented reasons for deprescribing were only available for 11 patients (25.6 %); reasons for deprescribing included patient-provider shared decision-making regarding the Black Box Warning [n = 5 (11.6 %)], inadequate treatment response [n = 3 (7.0 %)], suicidal thought development [n = 1 (2.3 %)], adverse drug event [n = 1 (2.3 %)], and pregnancy planning [n = 1 (2.3 %)].

Conclusion

Montelukast deprescribing rates were less than 5 % in outpatient specialty clinics. Factors associated with montelukast deprescribing beget further investigation.

Neuromodulatory effects of leukotriene receptor antagonists: A comprehensive review

Cysteinyl leukotrienes (CysLTs) are central to the pathophysiology of asthma and various inflammatory disorders. Leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRAs) effectively treat respiratory conditions by targeting cysteinyl leukotriene receptors, CysLT1 and CysLT2 subtypes. This review explores the multifaceted effects of LTs, extending beyond bronchoconstriction. CysLT receptors are not only present in the respiratory system but are also crucial in neuronal signaling pathways. LTRAs modulate these receptors, influencing downstream signaling, calcium levels, inflammation, and oxidative stress (OS) within neurons hinting at broader implications. Recent studies identify novel molecular targets, sparking interest in repurposing LTRAs for therapeutic use. Clinical trials are investigating their potential in neuroinflammation control, particularly in Alzheimer's disease (AD) and Parkinson's diseases (PD). However, montelukast, a long-standing LTRA since 1998, raises concerns due to neuropsychiatric adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Despite widespread use, understanding montelukast's metabolism and underlying ADR mechanisms remains limited. This review comprehensively examines LTRAs' diverse biological effects, emphasizing non-bronchoconstrictive activities. It also analyses plausible mechanisms behind LTRAs' neuronal effects, offering insights into their potential as neurodegenerative disease modulators. The aim is to inform clinicians, researchers, and pharmaceutical developers about LTRAs' expanding roles, particularly in neuroinflammation control and their promising repurposing for neurodegenerative disease management.

A Longitudinal Analysis of Black Box Warnings: Trends and Implications for Drug Safety

A black box warning, signaling potential life-threatening adverse effects of medications or medical devices, is crucial for public and healthcare professional awareness. Comprehending and adhering to these warnings can prevent serious harm. This review aims to elucidate their significance. Data on drugs with black box warnings were collected from the Food and Drug Administration's (FDA's) official website using the search term 'Boxed warnings' from January 1, 2015, to January 31, 2024. A Microsoft Excel spreadsheet (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, USA) containing black box warnings for this period was downloaded from the FDA's website. Additional parameters, such as drug class and whether the warnings were new or existing, were added to the downloaded spreadsheet. The collected data were organized by year, categorizing new and existing warnings, along with details on the evidence source, system-wise classification, and black box warnings for commonly used drugs, including their clinical significance. Results show that in the past decade, 40% of black box warnings were issued in 2023, followed by 12% in 2022. Most warnings (67%) comprised existing ones with minor revisions while 29% were new. Nine existing warnings were removed during the period. Post-marketing studies predominantly provided evidence for these warnings. Neuropsychiatric concerns like addiction potential (31%), suicidal tendency (7%), and hypersensitivity reactions (12%) were the frequently encountered black box warnings. Black box warnings play a crucial role in highlighting the serious adverse effects of medications. Neuropsychiatric warnings have been frequent over the past decade. Awareness of these warnings is essential to prevent adverse effects and enhance patient care, especially concerning drugs like guaifenesin/hydrocodone bitartrate, zolpidem, and montelukast commonly encountered in clinical practice.

Promising Effects of Montelukast for Critically Ill Asthma Patients via a Reduction in Delirium

Background: Montelukast (MTK), a potent antagonist of cysteinyl leukotriene receptor 1, has shown therapeutic promise for the treatment of neuropsychiatric disorders. Delirium, a common complication in critically ill patients, lacks effective treatment. This study aims to explore the impact of pre-intensive care unit (ICU) MTK use on in-hospital delirium incidence and, subsequent, prognosis in critically ill patients. Methods: A retrospective cohort study (n = 6344) was conducted using the MIMIC-IV database. After propensity score matching, logistic/Cox regression, E-value sensitivity analysis, and causal mediation analysis were performed to assess associations between pre-ICU MTK exposure and delirium and prognosis in critically ill patients. Results: Pre-ICU MTK use was significantly associated with reduced in-hospital delirium (OR: 0.705; 95% CI 0.497-0.999; p = 0.049) and 90-day mortality (OR: 0.554; 95% CI 0.366-0.840; p = 0.005). The association was more significant in patients without myocardial infarction (OR: 0.856; 95% CI 0.383-0.896; p = 0.014) and could be increased by extending the duration of use. Causal mediation analysis showed that the reduction in delirium partially mediated the association between MTK and 90-day mortality (ACME: -0.053; 95% CI -0.0142 to 0.0002; p = 0.020). Conclusions: In critically ill patients, MTK has shown promising therapeutic benefits by reducing the incidence of delirium and 90-day mortality. This study highlights the potential of MTK, beyond its traditional use in respiratory disease, and may contribute to the development of novel therapeutic strategies for delirium.

The pharmacotherapeutic management of allergic rhinitis in people with asthma

INTRODUCTION

Up to 90% of asthmatic patients have comorbid allergic rhinitis (AR). Although appropriate therapy of AR can improve asthma symptoms and management, AR is often underdiagnosed and under-treated in asthmatics.A non-systematic literature research was conducted on AR as a comorbidity and risk factor of asthma. Latest international publications in medical databases, international guidelines, and the Internet were reviewed.

AREAS COVERED

Based on the conducted literature research there is proved evidence of the necessity of diagnosis and treatment of AR in patients with asthma because it affects health care utilization. Therefore, it is recommended in national and global guidelines.

EXPERT OPINION

AR increases the risk of asthma development and contributes to the severity of an existing asthma. Early treatment of AR with drugs as intranasal steroids, antihistamines, leukotriene receptor antagonists, and especially allergen-specific immunotherapy can reduce the risk of asthma development and the concomitant medication use in addition to severity of symptoms in AR and asthma.