Delphi consensus recommendations for a treatment algorithm in pulmonary sarcoidosis

Consensus Recommendations for the Management of Neurosarcoidosis: A Delphi Survey of Experts Across the United States

Background and Objectives

Neurosarcoidosis poses a diagnostic and management challenge due to its rarity, phenotypic variability, and lack of randomized controlled studies to guide treatment selection. Recommendations for management based on expert opinion are useful in clinical practice and provide a framework for designing prospective studies.

Methods

In this Delphi survey study, specialists with experience in managing patients with neurosarcoidosis were invited to anonymously complete 2 surveys about key elements of evaluation, diagnosis, treatment, monitoring, and long-term management of neurosarcoidosis. Expert consensus recommendations were adopted if >80% threshold of agreement was reached.

Results

Of the 41 invited expert clinicians across the United States, 32 (78%) participated in the study. All round 1 respondents self-identified as neuroimmunologists (except for 1 pulmonologist). Consensus was reached regarding the need to consider neurosarcoidosis phenotype and severity to guide the choice of initial immunosuppression in both the acute (relapse) and maintenance phases. Experts endorsed the use of TNF-α inhibitors as first-line agents in selected phenotypes with poor prognosis. Neuroimaging was recommended to complement clinical surveillance for treatment response.

Discussion

There was agreement on several key issues, most importantly on the need to consider neurosarcoidosis phenotype and severity when deciding initial treatment. No consensus was achieved on the dosing and duration of specific immunosuppressants, nor regarding the management of the peripheral nervous system manifestation of neurosarcoidosis. These topics warrant further investigation.

Sarcoidosis Treatment Patterns in the United States: 2016-2022

BACKGROUND

There are limited US Food and Drug Administration-approved medications and real-world data on sarcoidosis treatment in the United States. Concordance of practice patterns with guideline recommendations have not been well characterized.

RESEARCH QUESTION

What are the practice patterns and factors associated with treatment for patients with sarcoidosis in the year following diagnosis?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted of patients with sarcoidosis from 2016 to 2022 using a multicenter, all-payer claims database (TriNetX). Treatments with corticosteroids and/or nonsteroidal immunosuppressive medications (methotrexate, mycophenolate, leflunomide, hydroxychloroquine, cyclophosphamide, infliximab, adalimumab, azathioprine, rituximab, and Janus kinase inhibitors) within 1 year of diagnosis were ascertained. We summarized treatment rates and sequence of prescribed medications by mean rank, and used multivariable logistic regression analyses to identify factors associated with treatment.

RESULTS

Of 13,330 patients with sarcoidosis meeting inclusion, 5,671 (42.5%) received treatment within 1 year of diagnosis. Of those treated, 60% received steroids alone, 13% received nonsteroidal immunosuppressives alone, and 27% received both. Furthermore, 25% of treated patients received a nonsteroidal immunosuppressive as their first medication. Corticosteroids had the lowest mean rank order, indicating they were, on average, the first medication initiated. Among those with pulmonary or cutaneous involvement, the second medication initiated, on average, was hydroxychloroquine; in those with cardiac or neurologic involvement, it was adalimumab and mycophenolate, respectively. Factors associated with higher odds of treatment were Black race, organ involvement at baseline (pulmonary, cardiac, and neurologic), and comorbid diagnoses (fatigue, hypercalcemia, and interstitial lung disease).

INTERPRETATION

Within the first year of diagnosis, 43% of patients with sarcoidosis were started on treatment. Nonsteroidal immunosuppressives were used in 40% of treated patients. Although factors associated with treatment initiation aligned with guideline recommendations, practice patterns of treatment were variable, particularly in choice and sequence of nonsteroidal immunosuppressive therapy, underscoring the need for future trials and comparative effectiveness studies.

Fibrotic Pulmonary Sarcoidosis-From Pathogenesis to Management

Sarcoidosis is a multiorgan, granulomatous disease of an unknown etiology. The characteristic feature of the disease is the formation of noncaseating granulomas. Spontaneous resolution occurs in most patients, but the clinical course may be chronic or progressive, complicated by pulmonary fibrosis, which is a major cause of mortality in sarcoidosis. Recent studies have provided new information on the immunological mechanisms of pulmonary fibrosis. Its pathogenesis includes the alteration of lymphocyte activity and the imbalance between their subpopulations, the polarization of macrophages to the profibrotic phenotype, and an imbalance between the activity of metalloproteinases and their tissue inhibitors. A multidisciplinary approach is required for the optimal management of fibrotic pulmonary sarcoidosis. Clinical symptoms, serum biomarkers, imaging, pulmonary function test results, other organ involvement, comorbidities, and complications should be considered when assessing disease activity and selecting the most appropriate treatment. The use of anti-inflammatory drugs is often discussed. There has been no consensus reached on whether antifibrotic agents should be added or used in monotherapy as initial treatment in such cases. This article will review all the information on fibrotic pulmonary sarcoidosis and present factors associated with fibrosis development, prognosis, and treatment options.

Targeted proteomics in extracellular vesicles identifies biomarkers predictive for therapeutic response in sarcoidosis

Background

∼30% of patients with sarcoidosis, a systemic granulomatous disease of unknown cause, need treatment to alleviate symptoms or prevent organ damage. Prednisone and methotrexate (MTX) are the most commonly used drugs; however, success of treatment varies from patient to patient. In this study, we search for biomarkers and pathways that predict response to treatment with prednisone or MTX in extracellular vesicles (EVs).

Methods

A targeted proteomics approach (OLINK Bioscience) was used in which 92 proteins were measured in two baseline EV fractions in 32 patients treated for pulmonary sarcoidosis (eight responders and eight non-responders each for prednisone and MTX). The top three proteins were replicated in 62 prednisone- and 76 MTX-treated patients.

Results

We identified 11 differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) between responders and non-responders to prednisone treatment, and 16 DEPs for patients treated with MTX. Reactome pathway analysis showed DEPs in prednisone to be involved in nuclear factor kappa B and interleukin signalling pathways. The DEPs in MTX were involved in transduction of GPI-anchored proteins and MAPK signalling pathway. CHI3L1 for prednisone and CPA1 for MTX were replicated as significant predictors of response.

Conclusion

This study is the first to show that in pulmonary sarcoidosis the response to treatment with prednisone or MTX can be predicted at baseline by different EV proteins active in different pathways. Using these markers and associated pathways to identify patients with a high probability of response to therapy will aid personalised treatment choice and improve treatment outcome.

Sarcoidosis-Associated Pulmonary Hypertension

Sarcoidosis is a granulomatous disorder of unknown etiology characterized by multisystem non-caseating granulomas. Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a well-known complication of sarcoidosis and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. The actual epidemiology of sarcoidosis-associated PH (SAPH) remains unknown, and its pathogenesis has not been fully elucidated. SAPH is classified under the miscellaneous category (group 5 of the PH classification). The clinical presentation of SAPH is variable and not always proportional to the severity of sarcoidosis. Appropriate management for SAPH by an experienced physician is important; however, no treatment algorithm for SAPH has been established. Lung transplantation should be considered in refractory cases. Pulmonary arterial hypertension-specific vasodilators targeting the endothelin pathway, nitric oxide pathway, and prostacyclin pathway have improved the clinical functions and hemodynamics in some patients with SAPH.

Delphi consensus recommendations for neuraxial anesthesia in adults with platelet disorders and coagulation defects: communication from the ISTH SSC Subcommittee on von Willebrand Factor

Neuraxial anesthesia is used for pain management in surgical and nonsurgical settings. Spinal/epidural hematomas likely occur in between 1:10 000 and 1:200 000 procedures. Risk is believed to be greater in patients with bleeding disorders/thrombocytopenia, and there are no existing comprehensive recommendations to guide neuraxial anesthesia in these patients. The study's objective was to develop recommendations to advise clinicians on treatment thresholds for neuraxial anesthesia in patients with platelet disorders/coagulation defects. A 4-round electronic modified Delphi consensus study was conducted. A steering committee generated the original Delphi statements and refined them based on panelist feedback. Consensus was achieved if ≥70% of participants agreed/strongly agreed or disagreed/strongly disagreed with a statement. This project was endorsed by the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis Scientific and Standardization Committee Subcommittee on von Willebrand Factor. Forty-five experts participated (42% response rate) with an essentially equal number of hematologists and anesthesiologists. Thirty consensus statements were developed for 11 disorders ranging from various causes of thrombocytopenia, inherited platelet function disorders, and single or multiple coagulation defects in obstetrical and nonobstetrical patients. Risk of sampling bias is present due to a predominantly North American sample, attrition (common in Delphi studies), and steering committee participation in the Delphi rounds. This is the first set of consensus recommendations for neuraxial anesthesia in adult patients with an array of platelet disorders/coagulation defects. These recommendations, based on the best available evidence and expert opinion, provide a decision framework for clinicians when faced with this challenging scenario.

PECULIARITIES OF THE COURSE OF PULMONARY SARCOIDOSIS AGAINST THE BACKDROP OF SYSTEMIC VASCULITIS AND THE INFLUENCE OF A SET OF TRIGGERS

The review focused on managing patients with pulmonary sarcoidosis against the backdrop of systemic vasculitis and the influence of a set of triggers which can be manifested by basal lymphadenopathy, infiltration of lung tissue, and damage to the eyes and skin, histologically characterized by the formation of non-caseous epithelioid-cell granulomas. A clinical case for managing patients with pulmonary sarcoidosis against systemic vasculitis was proposed. In this clinical case, it is crucial to consider the multifactorial nature of the pathology in the patient with the dominance of exogenous triggers (autoimmune pathology, sensitization, exposure to infectious factors, chemicals, stress), which can trigger the development of PS, complicate the course of accompanying pathology, and deteriorate the quality of life. Additionally, diagnosing PS in patients with other lung pathology, such as bronchial asthma, is often tricky and can affect the course of the underlying disease. Long-term immunosuppressive therapy may cause a secondary infection (viral, bacterial, fungal), which may require adequate etiotropic therapy.

Rheumatic Manifestations of Sarcoidosis

Sarcoidosis is a multisystem granulomatous inflammatory disorder, of unknown aetiology, which causes a wide spectrum of clinical phenotypes. It can present at any age, most commonly between 20 and 60 years, with a roughly equal sex distribution. Diagnosis is often delayed due to multiple diagnostic mimics, particularly joint disease. Common presenting features include pulmonary disease, with bilateral hilar lymphadenopathy and pulmonary infiltrates, cutaneous lesions, and ocular disease. Musculoskeletal manifestations are reported in 10-40% of patients with sarcoidosis and include bone lesions, acute arthritis, chronic arthritis, axial disease, dactylitis, and sarcoid myopathy, which are explored in detail in this review article. Diagnosis is confirmed through histological evidence of non-caseating granuloma on tissue biopsy. Newer imaging modalities, including 18FFDG PET/CT, can help identify the extent of musculoskeletal involvement, and biomarkers can provide weight to a diagnosis, but there is no single biomarker with prognostic value for disease monitoring. The mainstay of treatment remains corticosteroids, followed by disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs such as methotrexate and antimalarials. More recently, biologic treatments have been used successfully in the treatment of sarcoidosis with rheumatic involvement.

Pulmonary sarcoidosis: A comprehensive review: Past to present

Sarcoidosis is a sterile non-necrotizing granulomatous disease without known causes that can involve multiple organs with a predilection for the lung and thoracic lymph nodes. Worldwide it is estimated to affect 2-160/100,000 people and has a mortality rate over 5 years of approximately 7%. For sarcoidosis patients, the cause of death is due to sarcoid in 60% of the cases, of which up to 80% are from advanced cardiopulmonary failure (pulmonary hypertension and respiratory microbial infections) in all races except in Japan were greater than 70% of the sarcoidosis deaths are due to cardiac sarcoidosis. Scadding stages for pulmonary sarcoidosis associates with clinical outcomes. Stages I and II have radiographic remission in approximately 30%-80% of cases. Stage III only has a 10%-40% chance of resolution, while stage IV has no change of resolution. Up to 40% of pulmonary sarcoidosis patients progress to stage IV disease with lung parenchyma fibroplasia, bronchiectasis with hilar retraction and fibrocystic disease. These patients are at highest risk for the development of precapillary pulmonary hypertension, which may occur in up to 70% of these patients. Sarcoid patients with pre-capillary pulmonary hypertension can respond to targeted pulmonary arterial hypertension medications. Stage IV fibrocytic sarcoidosis with significant pulmonary physiologic impairment, >20% fibrosis on HRCT or pre-capillary pulmonary hypertension have the highest risk of mortality, which can be >40% at 5-years. First line treatment for patients who are symptomatic (cough and dyspnea) with parenchymal infiltrates and abnormal pulmonary function testing (PFT) is oral glucocorticoids, such as prednisone with a typical starting dose of 20-40 mg daily for 2 weeks to 2 months. Prednisone can be tapered over 6-18 months if symptoms, spirometry, PFTs, and radiographs improve. Prolonged prednisone may be required to stabilize disease. Patients requiring prolonged prednisone ≥10 mg/day or those with adverse effects due to glucocorticoids may be prescribed second and third line treatements. Second and third line treatments include immunosuppressive agents (e.g., methotrexate and azathioprine) and anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) medication; respectively. Effective treatments for advanced fibrocystic pulmonary disease are being explored. Despite different treatments, relapse rates range from 13% to 75% depending on the stage of sarcoid, number of organs involved, socioeconomic status, and geography. CONCLUSION: The mortality rate for sarcoidosis over a 5 year follow up is approximately 7%. Unfortunately, 10%-40% of patients with sarcoidosis develop progressive pulmonary disease, and >60% of deaths resulting from sarcoidosis are due to advance cardiopulmonary disease. Oral glucocorticoids are the first line treatment, while methotrexate and azathioprine are considered second and anti-TNF agents are third line treatments that are used solely or as glucocorticoid sparing agents for symptomatic extrapulmonary or pulmonary sarcoidosis with infiltrates on chest radiographs and abnormal PFT. Relapse rates have ranged from 13% to 75% depending on the population studied.

Quality of life in sarcoidosis

Having sarcoidosis often has a major impact on quality of life of patients and their families. Improving quality of life is prioritized as most important treatment aim by many patients with sarcoidosis, but current evidence and treatment options are limited. In this narrative review, we describe the impact of sarcoidosis on various aspects of daily life, evaluate determinants of health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and provide an overview of the different patient-reported outcome measures to assess HRQoL in sarcoidosis. Moreover, we review the current evidence for pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions to improve quality of life for people with sarcoidosis.

Calcitriol-Mediated Hypercalcemia Due to Liver Metastases in a Patient With Primary Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor

Hypercalcemia is most commonly associated with primary hyperparathyroidism or malignancy in the setting of elevated parathyroid hormone-related protein or bone metastases. Calcitriol (1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D)-mediated hypercalcemia is rare and typically associated with granulomatous conditions; however, other solid-organ etiologies have been reported. Here, we detail the case of a 62-year-old man with metastatic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (pNET) with hypercalcemia refractory to traditional bisphosphonate therapy in the setting of vastly elevated 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D. Only after initiation of chemotherapy with capecitabine and temozolomide did his serum calcium consistently improve and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D begin to decrease. There are fewer than 5 reported cases of a pNET resulting in calcitriol-mediated hypercalcemia. Prompt initiation of treatment for the underlying condition can result in a significant improvement in serum calcium or 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D. Multiple reports have also demonstrated success with high-dose steroid administration in patients with other solid-organ etiologies of calcitriol-mediated hypercalcemia, but this has not yet been reviewed in the pNET population.

Lung transplantation in pulmonary sarcoidosis

Sarcoidosis is a systemic inflammatory disease of unknown etiology and variable clinical course. Pulmonary sarcoidosis is the most common presentation and accounts for most morbidity and mortality related to sarcoidosis. While sarcoidosis generally has good outcomes, few patients experience chronic disease. A minority of patients progress to a specific phenotype of sarcoidosis referred to advanced pulmonary sarcoidosis (APS) which includes advanced fibrosis, pulmonary hypertension and respiratory failure, leading to high morbidity and mortality. In patients with advanced disease despite medical therapy, lung transplantation may be the last viable option for improvement in quality of life. Though post-transplant survival is similar to that of other end-stage lung diseases, it is imperative that patients are evaluated and referred early to transplant centers with experience in APS. A multidisciplinary approach and clinical experience are crucial in detecting the optimal timing of referral, initiating comprehensive transplantation evaluation and listing, discussing surgical approach, and managing perioperative and post-transplant care. This review article seeks to address these aspects of lung transplantation in APS.

[Position paper of the Austrian Society for Rheumatology and the Austrian Society for Pneumology on the diagnosis and treatment of sarcoidosis 2024]

In many cases sarcoidosis is a multisystemic disease that requires interdisciplinary medical cooperation in the diagnostics, treatment and medical care during follow-up. Due to the often chronic course, it is of utmost importance to include patients with their priorities and wishes at an early stage and extensively in disease management and to establish a shared decision making whenever possible. In the process of writing this joint position paper, the expert group on interstitial and orphan lung diseases of the Austrian Society for Pulmonology and the working group on rheumatological lung disorders of the Austrian Society for Rheumatology and Rehabilitation sought to include patient advocacy groups as well as experts for rare organ manifestations of sarcoidosis. This position paper is not only meant to reflect current scientific and clinical standards but should also focus the national expertise and by networking and exchange to be a first step to strengthen cooperation between stakeholders to ultimately improve care for patients with sarcoidosis.

Big data in sarcoidosis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review provides an overview of recent advancements in sarcoidosis research, focusing on collaborative networks, phenotype characterization, and molecular studies. It highlights the importance of collaborative efforts, phenotype characterization, and the integration of multilevel molecular data for advancing sarcoidosis research and paving the way toward personalized medicine.

RECENT FINDINGS

Sarcoidosis exhibits heterogeneous clinical manifestations influenced by various factors. Efforts to define sarcoidosis endophenotypes show promise, while technological advancements enable extensive molecular data generation. Collaborative networks and biobanks facilitate large-scale studies, enhancing biomarker discovery and therapeutic protocols.

SUMMARY

Sarcoidosis presents a complex challenge due to its unknown cause and heterogeneous clinical manifestations. Collaborative networks, comprehensive phenotype delineation, and the utilization of cutting-edge technologies are essential for advancing our understanding of sarcoidosis biology and developing personalized medicine approaches. Leveraging large-scale epidemiological resources and biobanks and integrating multilevel molecular data offer promising avenues for unraveling the disease's heterogeneity and improving patient outcomes.

Delphi Analysis: Optimizing Anatomy Teaching and Ultrasound Training for Botulinum Neurotoxin Type A Injection in Spasticity and Dystonia

Our objective was to provide expert consensus on best practices for anatomy teaching and training on ultrasound-guided botulinum neurotoxin type A (BoNT-A) injection for specialists involved in treating spasticity and dystonia. Nine experts (three neurologists; six physical medicine and rehabilitation physicians) participated in a three-round modified Delphi process. Over three rounds, experts reached consensus on 15 of 16 statements describing best practices for anatomy and BoNT-A injection training. They unanimously agreed that knowledge of the target audience, including their needs and current competency, is crucial when designing training programs. Experts also agreed that alignment between instructors is essential to ensure consistency of approach over time and between regions, and that training programs should be simple, adaptable, and "hands-on" to enhance engagement and learning. Consensus was also reached for several other key areas of training program development. The best-practice principles identified by expert consensus could aid in the development of effective, standardized programs for anatomy teaching and BoNT-A injection training for the purposes of treating spasticity and dystonia. This will enhance the exchange of knowledge, skills, and educational approaches between global experts, allowing more specialists to treat important movement disorders and ultimately improving patient outcomes.

The current state-of-the-art in pharmacotherapy for pulmonary sarcoidosis

INTRODUCTION

Sarcoidosis is a chronic granulomatous of unknown etiology that mostly affects lungs with an heterogenous clinical presentation and prognosis. Therefore, therapeutic management of the disease is challenging. The goals of treatment are to prevent or to minimize organ damage, to relieve symptoms, and to improve the patient's quality of life.

AREAS COVERED

The present review covers current pharmacotherapy options for pulmonary sarcoidosis. Corticosteroids are still the first-line treatment option, however, for those patients with prolonged expectation of treatment, undesirable side effects and refractory disease, immunosuppressive drugs are preferred options. Biological drugs are promising third line therapies. Recent evidence shows that antifibrotic agents, such as nintedanib, have a role in fibrotic lung disease, as well as efzofitimob, which has shown promising results in controlling inflammatory lung disease.

EXPERT OPINION

Sarcoidosis treatment is evolving as new molecules are available. The number of studies of therapies for pulmonary sarcoidosis has increased in recent years, however, the information available is still limited and there is no consensus on how to monitor the activity of the disease.

A young male with non-resolving consolidation and hepatosplenomegaly

ABSTRACT

Non-resolving consolidation refers to the persistence of radiographic abnormalities beyond the anticipated timeframe. Conditions such as infection, malignancy, inflammatory disorders, and connective tissue diseases can all manifest as non-resolving consolidation. We share a clinicopathological case study involving a 30-year-old male who exhibits non-resolving consolidation accompanied by hepatosplenomegaly.

Efficacy and safety of Infliximab in systemic sarcoidosis according to GenPhenReSa organ-involvement phenotype: a retrospective study of 55 patients

BACKGROUND

Infliximab is currently recommended as a third-line treatment for refractory sarcoidosis. Data in function of clinical phenotype are currently lacking. We evaluated patients' characteristics and responses to infliximab according to their GenPhenReSa cluster.

METHODS

We evaluated clinical and biological characteristics of patients diagnosed with sarcoidosis who received infliximab between September 2008 and April 2019 at our centre.

RESULTS

Fifty-five patients (median disease duration, 87 months) received infliximab: 48 (87%) as a second- or third-line treatment, and 7 (13%) as a first-line treatment. After a median duration of 12 months, 24 (45%) and 14 (25%) patients achieved complete and partial responses, respectively, together with a significant decrease in the number of affected organs and tapering of steroid doses. All patients with neurosarcoidosis (OR 17), 90% in group 2 (ocular-cardiac-cutaneous-CNS, OR 7.4), and approximately two-thirds of those in groups 1 (abdominal organs), 4 (pulmonary-lympho-nodal), and 5 (extrapulmonary), achieved a response, whereas patients in group 3 (musculoskeletal-cutaneous) had a treatment-failure OR of 9. Infliximab could be stopped after complete remission was achieved in 7 patients: 4 relapsed after a median of 6 months. Overall, 36% of patients experienced serious adverse events, mainly infections, which led to treatment cessation in 29% of patients and caused two deaths.

CONCLUSIONS

Other than patients with musculoskeletal-cutaneous involvement (group 3), infliximab led to a good response for patients with CNS (group 2) and liver (group 1) organ-predominant sarcoidosis. However, it led to serious infections and merely suspended sarcoidosis, so further research on factors predictive of relapse is needed.

[Therapeutic Pathways in Sarcoidosis. A Position Paper of the German Society of Respiratory Medicine (DGP)]

The present recommendations on the therapy of sarcoidosis of the German Respiratory Society (DGP) was written in 2023 as a German-language supplement and update of the international guidelines of the European Respiratory Society (ERS) from 2021. It contains 5 PICO questions (Patients, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes) agreed in the consensus process, which are explained in the background text of the four articles: Confirmation of diagnosis and monitoring of the disease under therapy, general therapy recommendations, therapy of cutaneous sarcoidosis, therapy of cardiac sarcoidosis.

Anti-inflammatory Therapy for Sarcoidosis

Over 50% of patients with sarcoidosis will require anti-inflammatory therapy at some point in their disease course. Indications for therapy are to improve health-related quality of life, prevent or arrest organ dysfunction (or organ failure) or avoid death. Recently published treatment guidelines recommended a stepwise approach to therapy however there are some patients for whom up front combination or more intense therapy maybe reasonable. The last decade has seen an explosion of studies and trials evaluating novel therapeutic agents and treatment strategies. Currently available anti-inflammatory therapies and several novel therapies are discussed here.

Acthar Gel in African Americans versus Non-African Americans with Symptomatic Sarcoidosis: Physician Assessment of Patient Medical Records

Introduction

Sarcoidosis is common among African Americans in the United States. Acthar® Gel is a viable option for the treatment of advanced symptomatic sarcoidosis. This study examined patient characteristics, Acthar Gel utilization, co-medication use, and treatment response based on physicians' assessments among African Americans versus non-African Americans with advanced symptomatic sarcoidosis.

Methods

Data from the medical charts of patients were used. During data collection, patients had either completed ≥1 course or received treatment with Acthar Gel for ≥6 months.

Results

This study comprised 168 African Americans and 104 non-African Americans. On average, the time since the first diagnosis of sarcoidosis was slightly longer among African Americans than non-African Americans (5.2 versus 4.3 years). Skin, heart, eyes, and joints were the most common extrapulmonary sites involved among both race groups. Shortness of breath, fatigue, bone and joint pain, and wheezing/coughing were the most frequent symptoms among both race groups. A higher proportion of African Americans versus non-African Americans were first-time Acthar Gel users and had not completed treatment during data collection. Patients in both race groups with higher starting doses of Acthar Gel therapy had a shorter treatment duration and vice-versa. A significantly lower proportion of patients among both race groups were on any co-medication after Acthar Gel initiation (p<0.0001). Further, a higher proportion of African Americans versus non-African Americans had a reduction in any co-medication use after Acthar Gel initiation. The mean daily dose of prednisone decreased among African Americans (18.5 to 10.1 mg) and non-African Americans (17.6 to 10.0 mg) after Acthar Gel initiation. Improvement in patient health status and overall symptoms was similar for both race groups.

Conclusion

Findings suggest that Acthar Gel improves health outcomes for patients with sarcoidosis, which could help to alleviate health disparities among African Americans, who are disproportionately affected by this disease.

Treatment of Granulomatous Inflammation in Pulmonary Sarcoidosis

The management of pulmonary sarcoidosis is a complex interplay of disease characteristics, the impact of medications, and patient preferences. Foremost, it is important to weigh the risk of anti-granulomatous treatment with the benefits of lung preservation and improvement in quality of life. Because of its high spontaneous resolution rate, pulmonary sarcoidosis should only be treated in cases of significant symptoms due to granulomatous inflammation, lung function decline, or substantial inflammation on imaging that can lead to irreversible fibrosis. The longstanding basis of treatment has historically been corticosteroid therapy for the control of granulomatous inflammation. However, several corticosteroid-sparing options have increasing evidence for use in refractory disease, inability to taper steroids to an acceptable dose, or in those with toxicity to corticosteroids. Treatment of sarcoidosis should be individualized for each patient due to the heterogeneity of the clinical course, comorbid conditions, response to therapy, and tolerance of medication side effects.

Clinical Manifestations and Management of Fibrotic Pulmonary Sarcoidosis

Fibrotic pulmonary sarcoidosis represents a distinct and relatively uncommon manifestation within the spectrum of sarcoidosis and has substantial morbidity and mortality. Due to the scarcity of research focused on this specific disease subtype, our current understanding of pathogenesis and optimal management remains constrained. This knowledge gap underscores the need for further investigation into areas such as targeted therapies, lung transplantation, and quality of life of patients with fibrotic pulmonary sarcoidosis. The primary aim of this review is to discuss recent developments within the realm of fibrotic pulmonary sarcoidosis to foster a more comprehensive understanding of the underlying mechanisms, prognosis, and potential treatment modalities.

D. Geraint James Lecture: The sarcoidosis saga: what insights from the past will guide us in the future

The sarcoidosis community in general and the World Association of Sarcoidosis and Other Granulomatous diseases (WASOG) in particular have led efforts to improve sarcoidosis diagnosis and care. Evidence based guidelines regarding the diagnosis and treatment have recently been published. In addition, several clinical trials examining existing and new treatments for sarcoidosis have been completed and published. In addition, WASOG has developed criteria and identified Centers of Excellence for sarcoidosis care around the world. In discussing what insights from the past will guide us in the future, this paper focuses on three specific topics: updating the diagnosis of sarcoidosis, using placebo-controlled trials to illuminate the natural course of pulmonary sarcoidosis; and exploring multidisciplinary sarcoidosis clinic care using Centers of Excellence. New approaches for diagnosis of sarcoidosis and steroid tapering are proposed based on current literature.

Emerging Therapeutic Options for Refractory Pulmonary Sarcoidosis: The Evidence and Proposed Mechanisms of Action

Sarcoidosis is a systemic disease with heterogenous clinical phenotypes characterized by non-necrotizing granuloma formation in affected organs. Most disease either remits spontaneously or responds to corticosteroids and second-line disease-modifying therapies. These medications are associated with numerous toxicities that can significantly impact patient quality-of-life and often limit their long-term use. Additionally, a minority of patients experience chronic, progressive disease that proves refractory to standard treatments. To date, there are limited data to guide the selection of alternative third-line medications for these patients. This review will outline the pathobiological rationale behind current and emerging therapeutic agents for refractory or drug-intolerant sarcoidosis and summarize the existing clinical evidence in support of their use.

Assessment of treatment response in cardiac sarcoidosis based on myocardial 18F-FDG uptake

Objective

Immunosuppressive therapy for cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) still largely consists of corticosteroid monotherapy. However, high relapse rates after tapering and insufficient efficacy are significant problems. The objective of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of non-biological and biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (nb/bDMARDs) considering control of myocardial inflammation assessed by 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) of the heart.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis of treatment response to nb/bDMARDs of all CS patients seen in the sarcoidosis center of the University Hospital Zurich between January 2016 and December 2020.

Results

We identified 50 patients with CS. Forty-five patients with at least one follow-up PET/CT scan were followed up for a mean of 20.5 ± 12.8 months. Most of the patients were treated with prednisone and concomitant nb/bDMARDs. At the first follow-up PET/CT scan after approximately 6.7 ± 3 months, only adalimumab showed a significant reduction in cardiac metabolic activity. Furthermore, comparing all serial follow-up PET/CT scans (143), tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi)-based therapies showed statistically significant better suppression of myocardial 18F-FDG uptake compared to other treatment regimens. On the last follow-up, most adalimumab-treated patients were inactive (n = 15, 48%) or remitting (n = 11, 35%), and only five patients (16%) were progressive. TNFi was safe even in patients with severely reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and a significant improvement in LVEF under TNFi treatment was observed.

Conclusion

TNFi shows better control of myocardial inflammation compared to nbDMARDs and corticosteroid monotherapies in patients with CS. TNFi was efficient and safe even in patients with severely reduced LVEF.

Corticosteroid Use and Adherence in Patients Treated with Acthar Gel for Advanced Sarcoidosis

INTRODUCTION

Long-term corticosteroid use in immune-mediated diseases is associated with increased risk of adverse events (AEs) and worsened health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Previous studies report chronic high-dose corticosteroid therapy results in higher rates of healthcare resource use and AE-related medical costs. Recent studies suggest Acthar® Gel (repository corticotropin injection) is an effective steroid-sparing therapy for sarcoidosis. This study compares the corticosteroid-sparing effect between Acthar Gel and comparators and evaluates the impact of Acthar Gel adherence on reduction of corticosteroid burden.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of a large administrative pharmacy and medical claims database (Symphony Health Solutions) was conducted. Patients were included with confirmed ICD-9/10 diagnosis for sarcoidosis in the study period (2014-2020), followed by ≥ 2 Acthar Gel claims or comparators (janus kinase inhibitor (JAKi)/rituximab), ≥ 18 years old, with 12 months coverage pre/post index. Outcomes were compared as change from baseline. Acthar Gel adherence was determined by proportion of days covered in the follow-up period.

RESULTS

The Acthar Gel (n = 735) and comparator (n = 626) cohorts were mostly female (68-72%) between 55 and 58 years old. Compared to the comparator cohort at baseline, Acthar Gel patients had greater any corticosteroid use (80% vs. 56%, p < 0.001), extended use (61% vs. 32%, p < 0.001), and mean average daily dose (6.72 vs. 3.03, p < 0.001). After treatment, Acthar Gel patients had greater reduction from baseline in any corticosteroid use (- 9.0% vs. - 3.2%) and extended use (- 10.0% vs. - 3.0%). In the Acthar Gel adherence cohorts, patients with above average adherence had greater reduction in both measures (- 11.2% vs. - 6.1%; - 11.6% vs. - 7.6%, respectively) than patients with below average adherence. Acthar Gel patients had greater reduction of extended use at all dose levels.

CONCLUSION

Acthar Gel is associated with reductions in corticosteroid use compared to alternatives. Better adherence is associated with greater reduction in corticosteroid exposure. Key Summary Points.

Cost-Effectiveness of Acthar Gel versus Standard of Care for the Treatment of Advanced Symptomatic Sarcoidosis

Introduction

Sarcoidosis is a multisystem, inflammatory, systemic granulomatous disease with unknown etiology. Despite the current standard of care (SoC), there is an unmet need for the treatment of advanced symptomatic sarcoidosis. This study assessed the cost-effectiveness of Acthar® Gel (repository corticotropin injection) versus SoC in patients with advanced symptomatic sarcoidosis from the United States (US) payer and societal perspectives over 2 and 3 years.

Methods

A probabilistic cohort-level state-transition approach was used for this cost-effectiveness analysis. Patients were monitored at the end of a 3-month cycle for the attainment of partial or complete response. Patients in the partial, complete, or no-response state were allowed to transition in each of these states at each 3-month cycle. Following the attainment of response, patients could have a durable response or relapse to a no-response state. Patients in a no-response state received treatment and could transition into a response or no-response state based on the probability of treatment success with the respective treatment. Clinical parameters and health utility data were sourced from the Acthar Gel in Participants with Pulmonary Sarcoidosis (PULSAR) trial (NCT03320070) and healthcare utilization, costs, and disutilities were sourced from the published literature. Base case analysis considered a payer perspective over 2 years.

Results

From a payer perspective, Acthar Gel versus SoC results in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $134,796 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) and $39,179 per QALY over 2 and 3 years, respectively. From a societal perspective, Acthar Gel versus SoC results in an ICER of $117,622 per QALY and $21,967 per QALY over 2 and 3 years, respectively. Sensitivity analysis findings were consistent with the base case.

Conclusion

The results from this cost-effectiveness analysis indicate that Acthar Gel is a cost-effective, value-based treatment option for advanced symptomatic sarcoidosis compared to the SoC from the US payer and societal perspectives.

Phenotypes of Sarcoidosis-Associated Pulmonary Hypertension-A Challenging Mystery

Sarcoidosis has been a well-recognised risk factor for pulmonary hypertension (PH) for a long time, but still, the knowledge about this concatenation is incomplete. Sarcoidosis-associated PH (SAPH) is an uncommon but serious complication associated with increased morbidity and mortality among sarcoidosis patients. The real epidemiology of SAPH remains unknown, and its pathomechanisms are not fully explained. Sarcoidosis is a heterogeneous and dynamic condition, and SAPH pathogenesis is believed to be multifactorial. The main roles in SAPH development play: parenchymal lung disease with the destruction of pulmonary vessels, the extrinsic compression of pulmonary vessels by conglomerate masses, lymphadenopathy or fibrosing mediastinitis, pulmonary vasculopathy, LV dysfunction, and portal hypertension. Recently, it has been recommended to individually tailor SAPH management according to the predominant pathomechanism, i.e., SAPH phenotype. Unfortunately, SAPH phenotyping is not a straightforward process. First, there are gaps in our understanding of undergoing processes. Second, the assessment of such a pivotal element as pulmonary vasculature on a microscopic level is non-feasible in SAPH patients antemortem. Finally, SAPH is a dynamic condition, multiple phenotypes usually coexist, and patients can switch between phenotypes during the course of sarcoidosis. In this article, we summarise the basic knowledge of SAPH, describe SAPH phenotypes, and highlight some practical problems related to SAPH phenotyping.

Sarcoidosis-associated pulmonary fibrosis: joining the dots

Sarcoidosis is a multisystem granulomatous disorder of unknown aetiology. A minority of patients with sarcoidosis develop sarcoidosis-associated pulmonary fibrosis (SAPF), which may become progressive. Genetic profiles differ between patients with progressive and self-limiting disease. The mechanisms of fibrosis in SAPF are not fully understood, but SAPF is likely a distinct clinicopathological entity, rather than a continuum of acute inflammatory sarcoidosis. Risk factors for the development of SAPF have been identified; however, at present, it is not possible to make a robust prediction of risk for an individual patient. The bulk of fibrotic abnormalities in SAPF are located in the upper and middle zones of the lungs. A greater extent of SAPF on imaging is associated with a worse prognosis. Patients with SAPF are typically treated with corticosteroids, second-line agents such as methotrexate or azathioprine, or third-line agents such as tumour necrosis factor inhibitors. The antifibrotic drug nintedanib is an approved treatment for slowing the decline in lung function in patients with progressive fibrosing interstitial lung diseases, but more evidence is needed to assess its efficacy in SAPF. The management of patients with SAPF should include the identification and treatment of complications such as bronchiectasis and pulmonary hypertension. Further research is needed into the mechanisms underlying SAPF and biomarkers that predict its clinical course.

High-dose (40 mg) versus low-dose (20 mg) prednisolone for treating sarcoidosis: a randomised trial (SARCORT trial)

BACKGROUND

Current guidelines recommend 20-40 mg·day-1 of oral prednisolone for treating pulmonary sarcoidosis. Whether the higher dose (40 mg·day-1) can improve outcomes remains unknown.

METHODS

We conducted an investigator-initiated, single-centre, open-label, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT03265405). Consecutive subjects with pulmonary sarcoidosis were randomised (1:1) to receive either high-dose (40 mg·day-1 initial dose) or low-dose (20 mg·day-1 initial dose) oral prednisolone, tapered over 6 months. The primary outcome was the frequency of relapse or treatment failure at 18 months from randomisation. Key secondary outcomes included the time to relapse or treatment failure, overall response, change in forced vital capacity (FVC, in litres) at 6 and 18 months, treatment-related adverse effects and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) scores using the Sarcoidosis Health Questionnaire and Fatigue Assessment Scale.

FINDINGS

We included 86 subjects (43 in each group). 42 and 43 subjects completed treatment in the high-dose and low-dose groups, respectively, while 37 (86.0%) and 41 (95.3%), respectively, completed the 18-month follow-up. 20 (46.5%) subjects had relapse or treatment failure in the high-dose group and 19 (44.2%) in the low-dose group (p=0.75). The mean time to relapse/treatment failure was similar between the groups (high-dose 307 days versus low-dose 269 days, p=0.27). The overall response, the changes in FVC at 6 and 18 months and the incidence of adverse effects were also similar. Changes in HRQoL scores did not differ between the study groups.

INTERPRETATION

High-dose prednisolone was not superior to a lower dose in improving outcomes or the HRQoL in sarcoidosis and was associated with similar adverse effects.

Sudden Vision Loss Due to Optic Neuritis-An Uncommon Presentation of Neurosarcoidosis

Sarcoidosis is a systemic, granulomatous disease of unknown etiology, most often manifested by mediastinal and hilar lymph node enlargement and parenchymal nodules in the lungs. However, it may involve any other organ. Neuro-sarcoidosis, a condition that affects up to 20% of sarcoidosis patients, can be found in any part of the central or peripheral nervous system and has important ophthalmic and neuro-ophthalmic manifestations. We present two patients with sudden vision loss due to neurosarcoidosis. In both cases, biopsy of the mediastinal lymph node showed non-caseating granulomas consistent with sarcoidosis. Treatment involved high doses of methylprednisolone intravenously, followed by topical dexamethasone eye drops in the first case and a systemic steroid treatment in the second, resulting in symptom relief. Those two cases demonstrate that sarcoidosis should be considered as a differential diagnosis in cases of optic neuritis.

International Delphi Consensus on the Management of AQP4-IgG+ NMOSD: Recommendations for Eculizumab, Inebilizumab, and Satralizumab

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is a rare debilitating autoimmune disease of the CNS. Three monoclonal antibodies were recently approved as maintenance therapies for aquaporin-4 immunoglobulin G (AQP4-IgG)-seropositive NMOSD (eculizumab, inebilizumab, and satralizumab), prompting the need to consider best practice therapeutic decision-making for this indication. Our objective was to develop validated statements for the management of AQP4-IgG-seropositive NMOSD, through an evidence-based Delphi consensus process, with a focus on recommendations for eculizumab, inebilizumab, and satralizumab.

METHODS

We recruited an international panel of clinical experts in NMOSD and asked them to complete a questionnaire on NMOSD management. Panel members received a summary of evidence identified through a targeted literature review and provided free-text responses to the questionnaire based on both the data provided and their clinical experience. Responses were used to generate draft statements on NMOSD-related themes. Statements were voted on over a maximum of 3 rounds; participation in at least 1 of the first 2 rounds was mandatory. Panel members anonymously provided their level of agreement (6-point Likert scale) on each statement. Statements that failed to reach a predefined consensus threshold (≥67%) were revised based on feedback and then voted on in the next round. Final statements were those that met the consensus threshold (≥67%).

RESULTS

The Delphi panel comprised 24 experts, who completed the Delphi process in November 2021 after 2 voting rounds. In round 1, 23/25 statements reached consensus and were accepted as final. The 2 statements that failed to reach consensus were revised. In round 2, both revised statements reached consensus. Twenty-five statements were agreed in total: 11 on initiation of or switching between eculizumab, inebilizumab, and satralizumab; 3 on monotherapy/combination therapy; 7 on safety and patient population considerations; 3 on biomarkers/patient-reported outcomes; and 1 on research gaps.

DISCUSSION

An established consensus method was used to develop statements relevant to the management of AQP4-IgG-seropositive NMOSD. These international statements will be valuable for informing individualized therapeutic decision-making and could form the basis for standardized practice guidelines.

Is the internet a sufficient source of information on sarcoidosis?

Introduction

Many patients use the internet as a source of health information. Sarcoidosis is a complex disease, and internet resources have not yet been analyzed for reliability and content on sarcoidosis.

Aims

Our study aimed to investigate the content and the quality of information on sarcoidosis provided by internet resources.

Methods

Google, Yahoo, and Bing were searched for the term "sarcoidosis," and the first 200 hits were saved in each case. Those websites that met the inclusion criteria (English language, no registration fees, and relevant to sarcoidosis) were then analyzed by two independent investigators for readability, quality (HON, JAMA, and DISCERN), and content (25 predefined key facts) of the provided information.

Results

The websites were most commonly scientific or governmental (n = 57, 46%), and the median time since the last update was 24 months. Quality was rated with a median JAMA score of 2 (1; 4) and a median overall DISCERN score of 2.4 (1.1; 4.1), both scores represent partially sufficient information. In total, 15% of websites had a HON certificate. Website content measured by the median key fact score was 19 (ranging from 2.5 to 25) with the lowest scores for acute vs. chronic course of the disease, screening for extrapulmonary disease, and diffuse body pain. Poor results were achieved in industry websites and blogs (p = 0.047) with significant differences regarding definition (p = 0.004) and evaluation (p = 0.021).

Discussion

Sarcoidosis-related content of internet resources is partially sufficient; however, several important aspects are frequently not addressed, and the quality of information is moderate. Future directions should focus on providing reliable and comprehensive information on sarcoidosis; physicians from different disciplines and patients including self-support groups should collaborate on achieving this.

Acthar Gel (RCI): A Narrative Literature Review of Clinical and Economic Evidence

Acthar^® Gel (repository corticotropin injection [RCI]) is a naturally sourced complex mixture of adrenocorticotropic hormone analogs and other pituitary peptides used to treat patients with serious and rare inflammatory and autoimmune conditions. This narrative review summarizes the key clinical and economic findings among 9 indications: infantile spasms (IS), multiple sclerosis (MS) relapses, rheumatoid arthritis (RA), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), dermatomyositis and polymyositis (DM/PM), ocular inflammatory diseases (primarily uveitis and severe keratitis), symptomatic sarcoidosis, and proteinuria in nephrotic syndrome (NS). Key studies of clinical efficacy and healthcare resource utilization and cost from 1956 to 2022 are discussed. Evidence supports the efficacy of RCI across all 9 indications. RCI is recommended as first-line treatment for IS and is associated with improved outcomes for the other 8 indications, including increased recovery rates in MS relapse; improved disease control in RA, SLE, and DM/PM; real-world effectiveness in patients with uveitis and severe keratitis; improved lung function and reduced corticosteroid use in symptomatic sarcoidosis; and increased rates of partial remission of proteinuria in NS. For many indications, RCI may improve clinical outcomes during exacerbations or when conventional treatments have failed to show a benefit. RCI is also associated with a reduction in the use of biologics, corticosteroids, and disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. Economic data suggest RCI is a cost-effective, value-based treatment option for MS relapse, RA, and SLE. Other economic benefits have been demonstrated for IS, MS relapses, RA, SLE, and DM/PM, including reduced hospitalizations, lengths of stay, inpatient and outpatient services, and emergency department visits. RCI is considered safe and effective and features economic benefits for numerous indications. Its ability to control relapse and disease activity makes RCI an important nonsteroid treatment option that could help preserve functioning and well-being among patients with inflammatory and autoimmune conditions.

Linking cardiac and extracardiac sarcoidosis and their clinical outcome: 18F-FDG PET/CT analysis in patients with systemic cardiac sarcoidosis

OBJECTIVE

To clarify the link between cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) and extra-CS (ECS) in systemic CS (SCS) patients in terms of extent and clinical outcome by serial FDG-PET/CT.

METHODS

Thirty-five SCS patients treated for > 2 years were enrolled in this study. In the overall analysis, patient-based comparisons of the complete resolution (CR) and recurrence rate between CS and ECS lesions were performed. Then, subgroup analyses were performed according to the extent (mono- vs. multi-organ ECS group) and clinical outcome (stable vs. unstable ECS group) of ECS. Pre-treatment cardiac FDG uptake was compared between the mono- and multi-organ ECS groups. The rates of CR, recurrence, and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

The CR rate was significantly higher in CS than ECS lesions [77.1% (27/35) vs. 48.5% (17/35), p = 0.01], whereas recurrence rates were similar between CS and ECS [40.7% (11/27) vs. 58.8% (10/17)]. Both the mono- and multi-organ ECS groups showed similar SUV_max, cardiac metabolic volume, and cardiac metabolic activity in the pre-treatment condition. The CR rates were similar between the mono- and multi-organ ECS groups [71.4% (15/21) vs. 85.7% (12/14)], but the recurrence rate was significantly lower in the multi-organ ECS group [60.0% (9/15) vs. 16.7% (2/12), p = 0.02]. The CR [71.4% (5/7) vs. 78.6% (22/28)] and recurrence rates [60.0% (3/5) vs. 36.3% (8/22)] were not significantly different between the stable and unstable ECS groups. The occurrence of MACE was also not significantly different between the mono- and multi-organ ECS groups [19.0% (4/21) vs. 28.6% (4/14)] or between the stable and unstable ECS groups [42.9% (3/7) vs. 17.8% (5/28)].

CONCLUSIONS

CS lesions respond to treatment better than ECS lesions, and the extent and clinical outcome of ECS lesion are not linked with those of CS lesions.

Immune-mediated lung diseases: A narrative review

The role of immunity in the pathogenesis of various pulmonary diseases, particularly interstitial lung diseases (ILDs), is being increasingly appreciated as mechanistic discoveries advance our knowledge in the field. Immune-mediated lung diseases demonstrate clinical and immunological heterogeneity and can be etiologically categorized into connective tissue disease (CTD)-associated, exposure-related, idiopathic, and other miscellaneous lung diseases including sarcoidosis, and post-lung transplant ILD. The immunopathogenesis of many of these diseases remains poorly defined and possibly involves either immune dysregulation, abnormal healing, chronic inflammation, or a combination of these, often in a background of genetic susceptibility. The heterogeneity and complex immunopathogenesis of ILDs complicate management, and thus a collaborative treatment team should work toward an individualized approach to address the unique needs of each patient. Current management of immune-mediated lung diseases is challenging; the choice of therapy is etiology-driven and includes corticosteroids, immunomodulatory drugs such as methotrexate, cyclophosphamide and mycophenolate mofetil, rituximab, or other measures such as discontinuation or avoidance of the inciting agent in exposure-related ILDs. Antifibrotic therapy is approved for some of the ILDs (e.g., idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis) and is being investigated for many others and has shown promising preliminary results. A dire need for advances in the management of immune-mediated lung disease persists in the absence of standardized management guidelines.

The management of sarcoidosis in the 2020's by the primary care physician

Sarcoidosis is an idiopathic granulomatous disease that occurs worldwide and may affect any organ. Because the presenting symptoms of sarcoidosis are not specific for the disease, the primary care physician is usually the first provider to assess these patients. In addition, patients who have previously been diagnosed with sarcoidosis are usually followed longitudinally by primary care physicians. Therefore, these physicians are often the first to address sarcoidosis patient symptoms related to exacerbations of the disease, as well as first observe complications of sarcoidosis medications. This article outlines the approach to the evaluation, treatment and monitoring of sarcoidosis patients by the primary care physician.

Sarcoidosis: Epidemiology and clinical insights

Sarcoidosis is characterized by noncaseating granulomas which form in almost any part of the body, primarily in the lungs and/or thoracic lymph nodes. Environmental exposures in genetically susceptible individuals are believed to cause sarcoidosis. There is variation in incidence and prevalence by region and race. Males and females are almost equally affected, although disease peaks at a later age in females than in males. The heterogeneity of presentation and disease course can make diagnosis and treatment challenging. Diagnosis is suggestive in a patient if one or more of the following is present: radiologic signs of sarcoidosis, evidence of systemic involvement, histologically confirmed noncaseating granulomas, sarcoidosis signs in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF), and low probability or exclusion of other causes of granulomatous inflammation. No sensitive or specific biomarkers for diagnosis and prognosis exist, but there are several that can be used to support clinical decisions, such as serum angiotensin-converting enzyme levels, human leukocyte antigen types, and CD4 Vα2.3+ T cells in BALF. Corticosteroids remain the mainstay of treatment for symptomatic patients with severely affected or declining organ function. Sarcoidosis is associated with a range of adverse long-term outcomes and complications, and with great variation in prognosis between populations. New data and technologies have moved sarcoidosis research forward, increasing our understanding of the disease. However, there is still much left to be discovered. The pervading challenge is how to account for patient variability. Future studies should focus on how to optimize current tools and develop new approaches so that treatment and follow-up can be targeted to individuals with more precision.

[Interstitial lung diseases : Classification, differential diagnosis and treatment approaches in a heterogeneous group of chronic lung disorders]

Interstitial lung diseases (ILD) comprise a heterogeneous group of chronic lung disorders of different etiologies that can not only affect the interstitium but also the alveolar space and the bronchial system. According to the "Global Burden of Disease Study" there has been an increase in incidence over the last decades and it is expected that the number of ILD-associated deaths will double over the next 20 years. ILD are grouped into those of unknown cause, e.g. idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), and ILD of known cause, which include drug-induced and connective tissue disease-associated ILD as well as granulomatous ILD such as sarcoidosis and hypersensitivity pneumonitis. In addition, some ILD present a progressive fibrosing phenotype, which influences therapeutic decisions. Predominantly inflammatory entities are treated with immunosuppressives, whereas predominantly fibrosing ILD are treated with antifibrotic drugs; in some cases, a combination of both is necessary. The spectrum of differential diagnoses in ILD is broad, but definite diagnosis is essential for treatment selection; therefore, the multidisciplinary ILD board plays a pivotal role.

Toward equitable open research: stakeholder co-created recommendations for research institutions, funders and researchers

Open Research aims to make research more accessible, transparent, reproducible, shared and collaborative. Doing so is meant to democratize and diversify access to knowledge and knowledge production, and ensure that research is useful outside of academic contexts. Increasing equity is therefore a key aim of the Open Research movement, yet mounting evidence demonstrates that the practices of Open Research are implemented in ways that undermine this. In response, we convened a diverse community of researchers, research managers and funders to co-create actionable recommendations for supporting the equitable implementation of Open Research. Using a co-creative modified Delphi method, we generated consensus-driven recommendations that address three key problem areas: the resource-intensive nature of Open Research, the high cost of article processing charges, and obstructive reward and recognition practices at funders and research institutions that undermine the implementation of Open Research. In this paper, we provide an overview of these issues, a detailed description of the co-creative process, and present the recommendations and the debates that surrounded them. We discuss these recommendations in relation to other recently published ones and conclude that implementing ours requires 'global thinking' to ensure that a systemic and inclusive approach to change is taken.

Treat to target and tight control: Could be a new approach in the treatment of sarcoidosis?

Sarcoidosis is a chronic granulomatous disease with multisystemic involvement. Although it is accepted as a benign disease, it can sometimes cause life-threatening organ (heart, brain) involvement that determines the prognosis of the disease. There are conflicting opinions about the treatment of the disease. In the generally accepted treatment approach the "step-by-step" model has gained weight. According to this approach, corticosteroids (CS) drugs alone are preferred in the first step in patients who require treatment. In the second step, immunosuppressive drugs (IS) are used in patients who do not respond to CS and/or have contraindications to CS use, and biologics (TNF-alpha inhibitors) are used in the third step. This treatment approach may be valid in cases with mild sarcoidosis. However, although sarcoidosis is considered a benign and self-limiting disease in some major organ involvement, the "step-by-step" approach may be a treatment option that puts the patient's life in danger. In such selected patients, much more rigorous, early and combined treatment approaches that definitely include CS, IS or biologic drugs may be required. In selected sarcoidosis patients with high risk, early diagnosis, "treat-to-target" (T2T) and "tight control" follow-up of patients seems to be a rational approach. This article reviews the "step-down" treatment regimens in light of recent literature data and hypothesizes that the T2T model may be a probable new treatment approach in patients with sarcoidosis.

The Risk of Sarcoidosis Misdiagnosis and the Harmful Effect of Corticosteroids When the Disease Picture Is Incomplete

Sarcoidosis is a complex granulomatous disease of unknown etiology. Due to the heterogeneity of the disease, the diagnosis remains challenging in many cases, often at the physician's discretion, requiring a thorough and complex investigation. Many other granulomatous diseases have the potential to mimic sarcoidosis, whether infectious, occupational, or autoimmune diseases and starting an unnecessary corticosteroid treatment can worsen the patient's prognosis, leading to side effects that can be harder to treat than the actual disease.

Leveraging in vitro and pharmacokinetic models to support bench to bedside investigation of XTMAB-16 as a novel pulmonary sarcoidosis treatment

Background: Sarcoidosis is a chronic, multisystem inflammatory disorder characterized by non-caseating epithelioid granulomas; infiltration of mononuclear cells; and destruction of microarchitecture in the skin, eye, heart, and central nervous system, and the lung in >90% of cases. XTMAB-16 is a chimeric anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) antibody, distinct from other anti-TNF antibodies based on its molecular structure. The efficacy of XTMAB-16 has not been clinically demonstrated, and it is still undergoing clinical development as a potential treatment for sarcoidosis. The current study demonstrates the activity of XTMAB-16 in a well-established in vitro sarcoidosis granuloma model, although XTMAB-16 is not yet approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for treatment of sarcoidosis, or any other disease. Objective: To provide data to guide safe and efficacious dose selection for the ongoing clinical development of XTMAB-16 as a potential treatment for sarcoidosis. Methods: First, XTMAB-16 activity was evaluated in an established in vitro model of granuloma formation using peripheral blood mononuclear cells from patients with active pulmonary sarcoidosis to determine a potentially efficacious dose range. Second, data obtained from the first-in-human study of XTMAB-16 (NCT04971395) were used to develop a population pharmacokinetic (PPK) model to characterize the pharmacokinetics (PK) of XTMAB-16. Model simulations were performed to evaluate the sources of PK variability and to predict interstitial lung exposure based on concentrations in the in vitro granuloma model. Results: XTMAB-16 dose levels of 2 and 4 mg/kg, once every 2 weeks (Q2W) or once every 4 weeks (Q4W) for up to 12 weeks, were supported by data from the non-clinical, in vitro secondary pharmacology; the Phase 1 clinical study; and the PPK model developed to guide dose level and frequency assumptions. XTMAB-16 inhibited granuloma formation and suppressed interleukin-1β (IL-1β) secretion in the in vitro granuloma model with a half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC₅₀) of 5.2 and 3.5 μg/mL, respectively. Interstitial lung concentrations on average, following 2 or 4 mg/kg administered Q2W or Q4W, are anticipated to exceed the in vitro IC₅₀ concentrations. Conclusion: The data presented in this report provide a rationale for dose selection and support the continued clinical development of XTMAB-16 for patients with pulmonary sarcoidosis.

Dual Medical Therapy for Treatment of Arrhythmias in Cardiac Sarcoidosis

Anti-arrhythmics can be useful for ventricular arrhythmias in cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) that are refractory to immunosuppression. However, there is conflicting evidence on the efficacy of immunosuppression for treating arrhythmias in CS patients and a lack of data to support using immunosuppression alone as an initial strategy. The objective of this study was to assess for differences in arrhythmia burden over time with currently used immunosuppression and anti-arrhythmic regimens. Patients with CS and implanted cardiac devices were identified from a single-center registry. Study participants were retrospectively classified based on the medication regimen as follows: control (no therapy), immunosuppression, anti-arrhythmics, or dual therapy. Device interrogations were reviewed for premature ventricular contractions (PVCs), non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT), and device firings over time. Interrogations for 42 patients were reviewed over a mean period of 31 months. Regression analysis showed a significant decrease in the frequencies of PVCs (slope, -1.47; P = .04) and NSVT (slope, -0.05; P = .01) for patients on dual therapy compared to an increase or no change in the other groups. Across all patients, there was no difference between groups in the percentage of patients experiencing device firings. In a subset analysis of patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators for primary prevention, 6% on dual therapy required device firings compared to 43% and 40% on single or no therapy, respectively (P = .049, χ² = 6.02). In conclusion, patients on both immunosuppression and anti-arrhythmics had a reduction in PVCs and NSVT over time. Overall, there were no differences between groups in terms of device firings, except in a subset analysis of patients with no history of ventricular tachycardia.

Sarcoidosis: Updates on therapeutic drug trials and novel treatment approaches

Sarcoidosis is a systemic granulomatous inflammatory disease of unknown etiology. It affects the lungs in over 90% of patients yet extra-pulmonary and multi-organ involvement is common. Spontaneous remission of disease occurs commonly, nonetheless, over 50% of patients will require treatment and up to 30% of patients will develop a chronic progressive non-remitting disease with marked pulmonary fibrosis leading to significant morbidity and death. Guidelines outlining an immunosuppressive treatment approach to sarcoidosis were recently published, however, the strength of evidence behind many of the guideline recommended drugs is weak. None of the drugs currently used for the treatment of sarcoidosis have been rigorously studied and prescription of these drugs is often based on off-label” indications informed by experience with other diseases. Indeed, only two medications [prednisone and repository corticotropin (RCI) injection] currently used in the treatment of sarcoidosis are approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration. This situation results in significant reimbursement challenges especially for the more advanced (and often more effective) drugs that are favored for severe and refractory forms of disease causing an over-reliance on corticosteroids known to be associated with significant dose and duration dependent toxicities. This past decade has seen a renewed interest in developing new drugs and exploring novel therapeutic pathways for the treatment of sarcoidosis. Several of these trials are active randomized controlled trials (RCTs) designed to recruit relatively large numbers of patients with a goal to determine the safety, efficacy, and tolerability of these new molecules and therapeutic approaches. While it is an exciting time, it is also necessary to exercise caution. Resources including research dollars and most importantly, patient populations available for trials are limited and thus necessitate that several of the challenges facing drug trials and drug development in sarcoidosis are addressed. This will ensure that currently available resources are judiciously utilized. Our paper reviews the ongoing and anticipated drug trials in sarcoidosis and addresses the challenges facing these and future trials. We also review several recently completed trials and draw lessons that should be applied in future.

Hit-hard and early versus step-up treatment in severe sarcoidosis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The treatment of sarcoidosis remains uncertain, despite 70 years of study. The conventional approach is to initiate corticosteroids in individuals who require treatment. The position of more aggressive regimes is unknown.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent recognition that many patients will require prolonged therapy, and the observation that corticosteroids lead to overt and insidious toxicities, have led to suggestions that steroid-sparing medications be used earlier in the management of sarcoidosis. Individuals with poor prognostic features, designated as 'high-risk' sarcoidosis may, especially benefit from a broader palette of therapeutic options in the initial treatment regimen. An even more aggressive approach, known as 'top-down' or 'hit-hard and early' therapy has emerged in the fields of gastroenterology and rheumatology in the past 15 years, on the premise that highly effective early control of inflammation leads to better outcomes. These regimens typically involve early initiation of biologic therapies.

SUMMARY

For certain subpopulations of sarcoidosis patients, 'top-down' therapy could be helpful. Severe pulmonary sarcoidosis, neurosarcoidosis, cardiac sarcoidosis and multiorgan sarcoidosis are phenotypes that may be most relevant for revised therapeutic algorithms. Precision medicine approaches and randomized trials will be necessary to confirm a role for top-down therapy in the routine management of sarcoidosis.

Rationale and design of the SARCoidosis Outcomes in all respiratory Viral Infectious Diseases (SARCOVID) Study

INTRODUCTION

Respiratory infections are ubiquitous. The COVID-19 pandemic has refocused our attention on how morbid and potentially fatal they can be, and how host factors have an impact on the clinical course and outcomes. Due to a range of vulnerabilities, patients with sarcoidosis may be at higher risk of poor outcomes from respiratory infections. The objective of the SARCoidosis Outcomes in all respiratory Viral Infectious Diseases (SARCOVID) Study is to determine the short-term and long-term impacts of respiratory viral illnesses (COVID-19 and non-COVID-19) in sarcoidosis.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Up to 20 clinical sites across the USA are participating in the recruitment of 2000 patients for this observational, prospective study. To ensure that the study cohort is representative of the general population with sarcoidosis, participating sites include those dedicated to reaching under-represented minorities or patients from non-urban areas. Baseline data on demographic features, comorbidities, sarcoidosis characteristics and pre-enrolment lung function will be captured at study entry. During this 3-year study, all acute respiratory infectious events (from SARS-CoV-2 and any other respiratory pathogen) will be assessed and recorded at quarterly intervals. The level of required medical care and survival outcomes determine infection severity, and the impact of infection on quality of life measures will be recorded. Post-infection lung function and imaging results will measure the long-term impact on the trajectory of sarcoidosis. Patients will be analysed according to the clinical phenotypes of cardiac and fibrotic pulmonary sarcoidosis. Control groups include non-infected patients with sarcoidosis and patients with non-sarcoidosis interstitial lung disease.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Each site received local institutional review board approval prior to enrolling patients, with the consent process determined by local institution standards. Data will be published in a timely manner (goal <12 months) at the conclusion of the 3-year follow-up period and will be made available upon request.