Measuring adherence to therapy in airways disease

Unlocking Better Asthma Control: A Narrative Review of Adherence to Asthma Therapy and Innovative Monitoring Solutions

This review addresses the ongoing challenges in asthma management, particularly focusing on patient adherence to inhaler therapy. Asthma, a chronic condition characterized by variable respiratory symptoms and airflow obstruction, can lead to significant morbidity and mortality if not properly managed. Despite advances in inhaler technology and therapeutic options, non-adherence remains a significant barrier to optimal asthma control. This review explores both intentional and unintentional non-adherence, influenced by factors such as age, socioeconomic status, and the complexity of inhaler devices. The Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) provides guidelines aimed at improving adherence through targeted interventions, and this review examines their application. Common inhaler technique errors, including incorrect inhalation speed, not exhaling before inhaling, and failure to hold breath post-inhalation, are identified as major contributors to inadequate asthma control. Furthermore, the review explores the emerging role of electronic monitoring devices (EMDs), such as CapMedic and DigiHaler, which offer real-time feedback to enhance inhaler technique and adherence. The role of biomarkers in assessing adherence and the potential of personalized treatment strategies, including biologic therapies, are also discussed. Overall, addressing adherence requires a comprehensive approach that integrates patient education, tailored interventions, and technological innovations to achieve better clinical outcomes in asthma management.

Psychometric Measurements of the Adherence to Refills and Medication Scales Among Patients With HIV/AIDS in Indonesia

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to conduct a psychometric evaluation of the Adherence to Refills and Medications Scale (ARMS) among patients with HIV/AIDS in Indonesia.

METHODS

Psychometric analysis was conducted at 2 hospitals and 7 public health centers at the voluntary counseling and testing clinic. Content validity was measured by assessing the relevance and clarity of each ARMS item. Construct validity was also assessed. Reliability was evaluated using internal consistency and test-retest reliability.

RESULTS

This study involved 11 experts in the assessment of the content validity and 240 participants in the estimation of the construct validity. All ARMS items were generally considered easy to understand and relevant, with scale-level content validity index based on the average method (S-CVI/Ave) of 0.9 (>0.78) and item-level content validity index (I-CVI) in the range from 0.5 to 1 for the relevance level and S-CVI/Ave of 0.95 (>0.78) and I-CVI in the range from 0.8 to 1 for the clarity level. Two items (numbers 2 and 3) were revised based on experts' suggestions to enhance comprehension. Confirmatory factor analysis supported 2 subscales: adherence to taking medications and adherence to refilling prescriptions. Good reliability was supported by internal consistency (Cronbach's α 0.793) and test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.722) for the overall adherence score.

CONCLUSIONS

The Indonesian version of ARMS is a valid and reliable medication adherence scale when used in Indonesian patients with HIV/AIDS.

Reduced Cost Sharing and Medication Management Services for COPD: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

High out-of-pocket costs and improper use of maintenance inhalers contribute to poor outcomes among patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). There is limited evidence for how addressing these barriers could improve adherence and affect COPD exacerbations, spending, or racial disparities in these outcomes.

Objective

To examine the effect of a national program to reduce beneficiary cost sharing for COPD maintenance inhalers and provide medication management services that included education on proper technique for inhaler use.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This randomized clinical trial included individuals with COPD. All individuals were enrolled in Medicare Advantage. Data were collected from January 2019 to December 2021, and data were analyzed from January 2023 to May 2024.

Intervention

Invitation to enroll in a program that reduced cost sharing for maintenance inhalers to $0 or $10 and provided medication management services. The random assignment of the invitation was used to estimate the effects of the invitation and program enrollment, overall and by race.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Inhaler adherence measured as proportion of days covered (PDC), moderate-to-severe exacerbations, short-acting inhaler fills, total spending, and as an exploratory outcome, out-of-pocket spending.

Results

Of 19 113 included patients, 55.2% were female; 9.5% were Black, 81.1% were White, and 9.4% were another or unknown race; and the median (IQR) age was 74 (69-80) years. Program enrollment was higher in the invited group (29.4%) than the control group (5.1%). The PDC for maintenance inhalers was higher in the invited group than the control group (32.0% vs 28.4%; adjusted invitation effect, 3.8 percentage points; 95% CI, 3.1-4.5); the adjusted effect of the program (the local average treatment effect) was 15.5 percentage points (95% CI, 12.8-18.1), a 55% relative increase in adherence. Mean (SD) out-of-pocket spending for prescriptions was lower in the invited group ($619.5 [$863.1]) than the control group ($675.0 [$887.3]; adjusted invitation effect, -$49.5; 95% CI, -68.9 to -30.0; adjusted program effect, -$203.0; 95% CI, -282.8 to -123.2), but there was no statistically significant difference in exacerbations, short-acting inhaler fills, or total spending. Among Black individuals, the adjusted invitation effect on maintenance inhaler PDC was 5.5 percentage points (95% CI, 3.3-7.7), and the adjusted program effect was 19.5 percentage points (95% CI, 12.4-26.7). Among White individuals, the adjusted invitation effect was 3.7 percentage points (95% CI, 2.9-4.4), and the adjusted program effect was 15.1 percentage points (95% CI, 12.1-18.1). The difference between the invitation effects by race was not statistically significant (1.8 percentage points; 95% CI, -0.5 to 4.1; P = .13).

Conclusions and Relevance

Individuals in Medicare Advantage who received an invitation to enroll in a program that reduced cost sharing for maintenance inhalers and provided medication management services had higher inhaler adherence compared with the control group. The difference in the program's effect on inhaler adherence between Black and White individuals was substantial but not statistically significant.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05497999.

Does inhaler adherence really matter in severe asthma?

Inhaled therapies, primarily the inhaled corticosteroid (ICS), have been the cornerstone of asthma treatment since the 1960s. They have been shown to reduce symptom burden, morbidity and mortality, and potentially avoid unnecessary and unscheduled healthcare. However, some people have severe asthma, defined by an inability to gain or maintain consistent disease control despite appropriate use of high dose ICS-containing inhalers. In this review, we discuss whether it is appropriate to demand adherence to a treatment this cohort are demonstrably resistant to.

A Simulation Study of the Effect of Clinical Characteristics and Treatment Choice on Reliever Medication Use, Symptom Control and Exacerbation Risk in Moderate-Severe Asthma

INTRODUCTION

The relationship between immediate symptom control, reliever medication use and exacerbation risk on treatment response and factors that modify it have not been assessed in an integrated manner. Here we apply simulation scenarios to evaluate the effect of individual baseline characteristics on treatment response in patients with moderate-severe asthma on regular maintenance dosing monotherapy with fluticasone propionate (FP) or combination therapy with fluticasone propionate/salmeterol (FP/SAL) or budesonide/formoterol (BUD/FOR).

METHODS

Reduction in reliever medication use (puffs/24 h), change in symptom control scores (ACQ-5), and annualised exacerbation rate over 12 months were simulated in a cohort of patients with different baseline characteristics (e.g. time since diagnosis, asthma control questionnaire (ACQ-5) symptom score, smoking status, body mass index (BMI) and sex) using drug-disease models derived from large phase III/IV clinical studies.

RESULTS

Simulation scenarios show that being a smoker, having higher baseline ACQ-5 and BMI, and long asthma history is associated with increased reliever medication use (p < 0.01). This increase correlates with a higher exacerbation risk and higher ACQ-5 scores over the course of treatment, irrespective of the underlying maintenance therapy. Switching non-responders to ICS monotherapy to combination therapy after 3 months resulted in immediate reduction in reliever medication use (i.e. 1.3 vs. 1.0 puffs/24 h for FP/SAL and BUD/FOR, respectively). In addition, switching patients with ACQ-5 > 1.5 at baseline to FP/SAL resulted in 34% less exacerbations than those receiving regular dosing BUD/FOR (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

We have identified baseline characteristics of patients with moderate to severe asthma that are associated with greater reliever medication use, poor symptom control and higher exacerbation risk. Moreover, the effects of different inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)/long-acting beta agonist (LABA) combinations vary significantly when considering long-term treatment performance. These factors should be considered in clinical practice as a basis for personalised management of patients with moderate-severe asthma symptoms.

Adherence in paediatric respiratory medicine: A review of the literature

Poor adherence is an important factor in unstable disease control and treatment failure. There are multiple ways to monitor a patient's adherence, each with their own advantages and disadvantages. The reasons for poor adherence are multi-factorial, inter-related and often difficult to target for improvement. Although practitioners can implement different methods of adherence, the ultimate aim is to improve health outcomes for the individual and the health care system. Asthma is a common airway disease, particularly diagnosed in children, often treated with inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting bronchodilators. Due to the disease's tendency for exacerbations and consequently, when severe will require unscheduled health care utilisation including hospital admissions, considerable research has been done into the effects of medication adherence on asthma control. This review discusses the difficulties in defining adherence, the reasons for and consequences of poor adherence, and the methods of recording and improving adherence in asthma patients, including an in-depth analysis of the uses of smart inhalers.

Metered-Dose Inhaler Spacer with Integrated Spirometer for Home-Based Asthma Monitoring and Drug Uptake

This work introduces Spiromni, a single device incorporating three different pressurised metered-dose inhaler (pMDI) accessories: a pMDI spacer, an electronic monitoring device (EMD), and a spirometer. While there are devices made to individually address the issues of technique, adherence and monitoring, respectively, for asthma patients as laid out in the Global Initiative for Asthma's (GINA) global strategy for asthma management and prevention, Spiromni was designed to address all three issues using a single, combination device. Spiromni addresses the key challenge of measuring both inhalation and exhalation profiles, which are different by an order of magnitude. Moreover, the innovative design prevents exhalation from entering the spacer chamber and prevents medication loss during inhalation using umbrella valves without a loss in flow velocity. Apart from recording the peak exhalation flow rate, data from the sensors allow us to extract other key lung volume and capacities measures similar to a medical pulmonary function test. We believe this low-cost portable multi-functional device will benefit both asthma patients and clinicians in the management of the disease.

Predictors of Patient-reported and Pharmacy Refill Measures of Maintenance Inhaler Adherence in Veterans with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Rationale: Suboptimal adherence to inhaled medications in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) remains a challenge. Objectives: To examine the sociodemographic and clinical characteristics and medication beliefs associated with adherence measured by self-report and pharmacy data. Methods: A cross-sectional analysis of data from a prospective observational cohort study of patients with COPD was completed. Participants underwent spirometry and completed questionnaires regarding sociodemographic data, inhaler use, dyspnea, social support, psychological and medical comorbidities, and medication beliefs (Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire [BMQ]). Self-reported adherence to inhaled medications was measured with the Adherence to Refills and Medications Scale (ARMS), and pharmacy-based adherence was calculated from administrative data using the ReComp score. Multivariable linear regression was used to examine the sociodemographic, clinical, and medication-belief factors associated with both adherence measures. Results: Among 269 participants with ARMS and ReComp data, adherence was the same for each measure (38.3%), but only 18% of participants were adherent by both measures. In multivariable adjusted analysis, a 10-year increase in age (β = 0.54; 95% confidence interval, 0.14-0.94) and the number of maintenance inhalers used (β = 0.53; 0.04-1.02) were associated with increased adherence by self-report. Improved ReComp adherence was associated with chronic prednisone use (β = 0.18; 0.04-0.31) and the number of maintenance inhalers used (β = 0.11; 0.05-0.17). In adjusted analyses examining patient beliefs about medications, increases in the COPD-specific BMQ concerns score (β = -0.10; -0.17 to -0.02) were associated with reduced self-reported adherence. No significant associations between ReComp adherence and BMQ score were found in adjusted analyses. Conclusions: Adherence to inhaled COPD medications was poor as measured by self-report or pharmacy refill data. There were notable differences in factors associated with adherence based on the method of adherence measurement. Older age, chronic prednisone use, the number of prescribed maintenance inhalers used, and patient beliefs about medication safety were associated with adherence. Overall, fewer variables were associated with adherence as measured based on pharmacy refills. Pharmacy refill-based and self-reported adherence may measure distinct aspects of adherence and may be affected by different factors. These results also underscore the importance of addressing patient beliefs when developing interventions to improve medication adherence.

The role of the clinical pharmacist in the respiratory or sleep multidisciplinary team

The role of the pharmacist has evolved significantly, not least over the last 20 years. It delivers a skilled profession with a vital role in medicines optimisation and the management of patients with a respiratory or sleep disorder. While pharmacists are capable of acting as independent practitioners delivering direct patient care, this article explores their contribution to multidisciplinary teams within asthma, COPD, cystic fibrosis, tuberculosis, interstitial lung disease and sleep medicine. Having identified patient cohorts needing specialist medicines support, notably those with poor medicines adherence or specific medicines-related needs (for example during adolescence, or women who are pregnant or breastfeeding), these pharmacists work within primary, secondary and specialist tertiary care. The aim of this review is to share and inspire innovative models of working to include more pharmacists in respiratory and sleep medicine.

Clinical and psychological aspects in a group of allergic asthma patients and the impact on their health status perception

BACKGROUND

The interplay between physical and psychological symptoms frequently affects the health-related quality of life of asthma patients.

PARTICIPANTS AND PROCEDURE

This research aimed at assessing the psychological status of 60 patients attending their first/second doctor visit at which they were diagnosed with allergic asthma. Information on psychological distress was collected through the Symptom Questionnaire (SQ), personality traits were described through Cattell's 16-Personality Factor Questionnaire (16-PF), stress-related behavior was detected through the P Stress Questionnaire (PSQ), and the perceived quality of life was described with the Rhinasthma questionnaire.

RESULTS

The SQ revealed anxiety levels above the clinical cut-off in 71.7% of patients, levels of depression in 46.7%, anger-hostility in 53.3%, and somatic symptoms in 65%. No significant differences were observed after three months. The 16-PF scores were also suggestive of specific personality traits associated with the predisposition towards psychosomatic disorders. However, no stress-related behaviors were observed with the PSQ. Rhinasthma highlighted a certain degree of the perceived quality of life. Additionally, the quality of life correlated with age, all psychological distress scales, a few personality traits, vigor, and stress disorders.

CONCLUSIONS

Allergic asthma patients present a higher-than-average level of psychological distress and impaired perceived quality of life at the time of diagnosis. Therefore, it is important to assess the psychological status in addition to the respiratory function.

Effect of monitoring adherence to regular inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) alone or in combination with a long-acting β2-agonist (LABA) using electronic methods on asthma outcomes: a narrative systematic review

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate through a systematic review the effectiveness of electronic methods in monitoring adherence to regular inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) alone or in combination with long-acting β2-agonists (LABAs) and their effect on clinical outcomes.

DESIGN

A narrative systematic review.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and Web of Science were searched through up to 10 July 2022.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

We included peer-reviewed studies of qualitative and quantitative outcomes that compared the effect of electronic methods to routine non-electronic monitoring intervention or placebo among children and adults with asthma on medication adherence rates to regular ICS alone or in combination with LABA, asthma control and asthma exacerbations.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Data extraction was performed according to a predetermined sheet specific to the review objectives. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool for randomised controlled trials and the Risk of Bias in Systematic Reviews tool for systematic reviews. Meta-analysis was not possible based on the findings of the scoping search; however, a narrative review was performed to allow for the grouping of results based on asthma inhaler adherence rates, asthma control and exacerbations.

RESULTS

Six articles comprising 98 studies published from 1998 to 2022 in the USA, Canada and the UK were included. Compared with the control, electronic monitoring devices (EMDs) showed a 23% adherence improvement, mean difference (MD) of 23%, 95% CI 10.84 to 34.16, p=0.0002. Asthmatic children were 1.5 times more likely to be adherent using EMDs compared with non-EMD users (RR=1.5, 95% CI 1.19 to 1.9) (p<0.001). Mobile devices and text message reminders (MHealth) showed a 12% adherence improvement (MD 12%, 95% CI 6.22 to 18.03) (p<0.0001), alongside a small to medium improvement in asthma control (standardised mean difference (SMD) 0.31, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.44), small improvement in asthma-related quality of life (SMD 0.26) (p=0.007) and variable risk reduction in asthma exacerbations for digital health (risk ratio 0.53, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.91) (p=0.02) compared with EMDs, which showed insignificant differences (risk ratio 0.89, 95% CI 0.45 to 1.75) (p=0.72). Technologies combined yielded variable adherence effects, with an SMD for eHealth of 0.41, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.79, and MD for digital health was 14.66% higher than the control, 95% CI 7.74 to 21.57. Heterogeneity between studies was significant (eHealth I2=98%, digital I2=94%).

CONCLUSION

Electronic methods improved adherence to inhaled medications in asthma. EMDs appear to be the most effective technology, followed by mHealth. The adherence improvement was associated with a small clinical improvement. There was inconsistent overlapping of terminology describing electronic methods that require standardisation. Data on the cost-effectiveness of electronic devices and their utilisation in severe asthma are lacking and require further research.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42022303069.

Measurement of adherence to inhaled corticosteroids by self-report and electronic medication monitoring

OBJECTIVE

Poor adherence to daily inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) is an important factor contributing to asthma morbidity. Assessing adherence in clinical settings using self-reported adherence often overestimates actual adherence. Electronic monitoring devices (EMDs) are objective means of assessing adherence, but are not routinely used in practice. Here, we aimed to establish adherence rates to ICS using EMDs in an inner-city, minority population in the Bronx, NY, and to compare two methods of self-reported adherence with EMD-measured adherence.

METHODS

Patients with physician-confirmed persistent asthma and daily ICS prescription were recruited. Self-reported adherence to ICS was measured by parental report for children and self-report for adults and the Medication Adherence Report Scale for Asthma (MARS-A). Two weeks after enrollment, EMD data were accessed for analysis. Daily adherence was calculated based on the number of puffs actuated per day as captured by EMD divided by the prescribed number of puffs.

RESULTS

41 children and 40 adults participated. Median EMD-measured ICS adherence was 41% (children) and 43% (adults). This was significantly lower than the median self-reported adherence (100% for children, p < 0.001; 100% for adults, p < 0.001). MARS-A score in children did not correlate with EMD adherence data (p = 0.18), while in adults, this correlation tended to be more consistent (p = 0.07).

CONCLUSIONS

Adherence to daily ICS as measured using EMD is low in this population. In both adults and children, self-reported adherence was a poor indicator of true adherence. Further efforts using objective measures of medication adherence for patients with high asthma morbidity may be warranted to guide therapeutic decisions.

A Charter to Fundamentally Change the Role of Oral Corticosteroids in the Management of Asthma

Asthma affects 339 million people worldwide, with an estimated 5-10% experiencing severe asthma. In emergency settings, oral corticosteroids (OCS) can be lifesaving, but acute and long-term treatment can produce clinically important adverse outcomes and increase the risk of mortality. Therefore, global guidelines recommend limiting the use of OCS. Despite the risks, research indicates that 40-60% of people with severe asthma are receiving or have received long-term OCS treatment. Although often perceived as a low-cost option, long-term OCS use can result in significant health impairments and costs owing to adverse outcomes and increased utilization of healthcare resources. Alternative treatment methods, such as biologics, may produce cost-saving benefits with a better safety profile. A comprehensive and concerted effort is necessary to tackle the continued reliance on OCS. Accordingly, a threshold for OCS use should be established to help identify patients at risk of OCS-related adverse outcomes. Receiving a total dose of more than 500 mg per year should trigger a review and specialist referral. Changes to national and local policies, following examples from other chronic diseases, will be crucial to achieving this goal. Globally, multiple barriers to change still exist, but specific steps have been identified to help clinicians reduce reliance on OCS. Implementing these changes will result in positive health outcomes for patients and social and economic benefits for societies.

Assessing adherence to inhaled therapies in asthma and the emergence of electronic monitoring devices

Infrequent use of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and/or over-reliance of short-acting β-agonists (SABA) are recognised as key contributors to increased morbidity and mortality in asthma. The most frequent measures of ICS adherence and SABA use rely on patient-reported questionnaires or prescription refill records, neither of which are considered sufficiently reliable. Technological advancements in the development of electronic monitoring of inhaler devices allow for monitoring of use, as well as recording of and feedback on inhaler technique for some devices. Most electronic monitoring devices (EMDs) are paired with a smartphone application, allowing patients to set reminders and display both preventer and reliever use over time. This allows identification of intentional and unintentional ICS non-adherence as well as frequency of SABA use. This information assists clinicians in distinguishing difficult-to-control from severe asthma. Although additional evidence is required to assess the impact of EMDs on clinical outcome measures such as exacerbation rate, the introduction of EMDs into the asthma armoury is a significant step forward in asthma care with the potential to improve asthma-related outcomes.

Improving adherence in chronic airways disease: are we doing it wrongly?

Non-adherence to medicines is a significant clinical and financial burden, but successful strategies to improve it, and thus bring about significant improvements in clinical outcome, remain elusive. Many barriers exist, including a lack of awareness amongst some healthcare professionals as to the extent and impact of non-adherence and a dearth of skills to address it successfully. Patients may not appreciate that they are non-adherent, feel they cannot disclose it or underestimate its impact on their health in the short and longer term. In describing the evidence-based frameworks that identify the causal factors behind medicines taking (or not taking) behaviours, we can start to personalise interventions to enable individuals to make informed decisions about their treatments and thus overcome real and perceived barriers to adherence.

Medicines non-adherence is common and associated with significant morbidity and mortality. @GrainnedAn and colleagues outline causal factors behind this behaviour and the appropriate individualised interventions available to support optimal medicines use.https://bit.ly/3ejJNTV

Adherence to treatment

As clinicians, we are aware that prescribing a treatment is one thing, patients taking the treatment as prescribed is quite another. Adherence, which describes “the extent to which a patient correctly follows medical instructions” [1] is generally poor for long-term therapy for chronic illnesses. A systematic review of 37 studies in patients with COPD found that nonadherence to treatment ranged from 22 to 93% [2]. In young adults aged 15–30 years with asthma a meta-analysis of 16 studies demonstrated a pooled adherence to inhaled corticosteroid treatment of only 28% (95% CI 20–38%; p<0.001), with rates ranging from 6 to 58% [3].

The latest issue of Breathe focuses on adherence to treatment: read the introductory editorial by Chief Editor @ClaudiaCDoblerhttps://bit.ly/3vVRjKU