Clinical predictors and explant lung pathology of acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

CSF3 aggravates acute exacerbation of pulmonary fibrosis by disrupting alveolar epithelial barrier integrity

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a chronic and progressive respiratory disorder characterized by poor prognosis, often presenting with acute exacerbation. The primary cause of death associated with IPF is acute exacerbation of IPF (AE-IPF). However, the pathophysiology of acute exacerbation has not been clearly elucidated yet. This study aims to investigate the underlying pathophysiological molecular mechanism in a mouse AE-PF model. C57BL/6J mice were intratracheally administered bleomycin (BLM, 5 mg/kg) to induce pulmonary fibrosis. After 14 days, lipopolysaccharide (LPS, 2 mg/kg) was injected via the trachea route. Histological assessments, including H&E and Masson staining, as well as inflammatory indicators, were included to evaluate the induction of AE-PF by BLM and LPS in mice. Transcriptomic profiling of pulmonary tissues identified CSF3 as one of the top 10 upregulated DEGs in AE-PF mice. Indeed, administration of exogenous CSF3 protein exacerbated AE-PF in mice. Mechanistically, CSF3 disrupted alveolar epithelial barrier integrity and permeability by regulating specialized cell adhesion complexes such as tight junctions (TJs) and adherens junctions (AJs) via PI3K/p-Akt/Snail pathway, contributing to the aggravation of AE-PF in mice. Moreover, the discovery of elevated sera CSF3 indicated a notable increase in IPF patients during the exacerbation of the disease. Pearson correlation analysis in IPF patients revealed significant positive associations between CSF3 levels and KL-6 levels, LDH levels, CRP levels, respectively. These results provide mechanistic insights into the role of CSF3 in exacerbating of lung fibrotic disease and indicate monitoring CSF3 levels may aid in early clinical decisions for alternative therapy in the management of rapidly progressing IPF.

Imaging of Pulmonary Fibrosis: An Update, From the AJR Special Series on Imaging of Fibrosis

Pulmonary fibrosis is recognized as occurring in association with a wide and increasing array of conditions, and it presents with a spectrum of chest CT appearances. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), which corresponds histologically with usual interstitial pneumonia and represents the most common idiopathic interstitial pneumonia, is a chronic progressive fibrotic interstitial lung disease (ILD) of unknown cause. Progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PPF) describes the radiologic development of pulmonary fibrosis in patients with ILD of a known or unknown cause other than IPF. The recognition of PPF impacts management of patients with ILD-for example, in guiding initiation of antifibrotic therapy. Interstitial lung abnormalities are an incidental CT finding in patients without suspected ILD and may represent an early intervenable form of pulmonary fibrosis. Traction bronchiectasis and/or bronchiolectasis, when detected in the setting of chronic fibrosis, is generally considered evidence of irreversible disease, and progression predicts worsening mortality risk. Awareness of the association between pulmonary fibrosis and connective tissue diseases, particularly rheumatoid arthritis, is increasing. This review provides an update on the imaging of pulmonary fibrosis, with attention given to recent advances in disease understanding with relevance to radiologic practice. The essential role of a multidisciplinary approach to clinical and radiologic data is highlighted.

Acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis model in the rats using bleomycin and lipopolysaccharides

Objective

This study was conducted to establish a rat model of acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (AE-IPF) using the combination of bleomycin (BLM) and lipopolysaccharides (LPS).

Materials and Method

Twenty-four male Sprague Dawley rats were allocated into two equal groups: the sham or the bleomycin and lipopolysaccharides-induced AE-IPF group (BLM-LPS). On Day 7, BLM intratracheally and LPS intraperitoneally were both used to administer AE-IPF. The BLM-LPS group and its respective sham group were terminated on Days 8, 14, or 21. Samples of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) and lungs were taken and investigated for cell count and histopathology.

Results

On Day 8, histological analysis revealed inflammatory cell infiltration with edema and hyaline membrane, and the BALF differential cell count revealed high neutrophil counts. By having a higher collagen density area and Ashcroft modified score than the sham group on Day 14, the BLM-LPS group displayed significantly lower oxygen saturation, alveolar air area, and a fibrotic appearance. However, there was a spontaneous resolution in inflammation and fibrotic appearance on Day 21 after the BLM administration.

Conclusions

By combining BLM and LPS, it was possible to create a successful rat model of AE-IPF. The present model showed the peak exacerbation on Day 8 and the fibrotic peak on Day 14, which gradually improved. The optimal time for the new AE-IPF therapeutic intervention was determined to be between Days 8 and 14.

A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Clinical, Respiratory, and Biochemical Risk Factors for Acute Exacerbation of idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis

BACKGROUND

A better capacity to identify patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) at risk of acute exacerbation (AEIPF) might improve outcomes and reduce healthcare costs.

AIMS

We critically appraised the available evidence of the differences in clinical, respiratory, and biochemical parameters between AEIPF and IPF patients with stable disease (SIPF) by conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus were reviewed up until August 1, 2022, for studies reporting differences in clinical, respiratory, and biochemical parameters (including investigational biomarkers) between AEIPF and SIPF patients. The Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist was used to assess the risk of bias.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine cross-sectional studies published between 2010 and 2022 were identified (all with a low risk of bias). Of the 32 meta-analysed parameters, significant differences were observed between groups, assessed through standard mean differences or relative ratios, with age, forced vital capacity, vital capacity, carbon monoxide diffusion capacity, total lung capacity, oxygen partial pressure, alveolar-arterial oxygen gradient, P/F ratio, 6 min walk test distance, C-reactive protein, lactate dehydrogenase, white blood cell count, albumin, Krebs von den Lungen 6, surfactant protein D, high mobility group box 1 protein, and interleukin-1β, 6, and 8.

CONCLUSIONS

We identified significant differences between AEIPF and SIPF patients in age and specific parameters of respiratory function, inflammation, and epithelial lung damage. Prospective studies are warranted to determine the capacity of these parameters to predict AEIPF more accurately (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42022356640).

A Systematic Review of the Prognostic Significance of the Body Mass Index in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis

The identification of novel prognostic biomarkers might enhance individualized management strategies in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Although several patient characteristics are currently used to predict outcomes, the prognostic significance of the body mass index (BMI), a surrogate measure of excess fat mass, has not been specifically investigated until recently. We systematically searched PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus, from inception to July 2022, for studies investigating associations between the BMI and clinical endpoints in IPF. The Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist was used to assess the risk of bias. The PRISMA 2020 statement on the reporting of systematic reviews was followed. Thirty-six studies were identified (9958 IPF patients, low risk of bias in 20), of which 26 were published over the last five years. Significant associations between lower BMI values and adverse outcomes were reported in 10 out of 21 studies on mortality, four out of six studies on disease progression or hospitalization, and two out of three studies on nintedanib tolerability. In contrast, 10 out of 11 studies did not report any significant association between the BMI and disease exacerbation. Our systematic review suggests that the BMI might be useful to predict mortality, disease progression, hospitalization, and treatment-related toxicity in IPF (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42022353363).

Disease pathology in fibrotic interstitial lung disease: is it all about usual interstitial pneumonia?

The interstitial pneumonias comprise a diverse group of diseases that are typically defined by their cause (either idiopathic or non-idiopathic) and their distinct histopathological features, for which radiology, in the form of high-resolution CT, is often used as a surrogate. One trend, fuelled by the failure of conventional therapies in a subset of patients and the broad-spectrum use of antifibrotic therapies, has been the focus on the progressive fibrosing phenotype of interstitial lung disease. The histological pattern, known as usual interstitial pneumonia, is the archetype of progressive fibrosis. However, it is clear that progressive fibrosis is not exclusive to this histological entity. Techniques including immunohistochemistry and single-cell RNA sequencing are providing pathogenetic insights and, if integrated with traditional histopathology, are likely to have an effect on the pathological classification of interstitial lung disease. This review, which focuses on the histopathology of interstitial lung disease and its relationship with progressive fibrosis, asks the question: is it all about usual interstitial pneumonia?

Cyclophosphamide added to glucocorticoids in acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (EXAFIP): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND

The use of cyclophosphamide in patients with acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is unknown. Our study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of four cyclophosphamide pulses in addition to high-dose methylprednisolone in this population.

METHODS

In this double-blind, placebo-controlled trial done in 35 departments across 31 hospitals in France, adult patients (≥18 years) with acute exacerbation of IPF and those with suspected acute exacerbation of IPF were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio using a web-based system to receive either intravenous pulses of cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m²) plus uromitexan as haemorrhagic cystitis prophylaxis (200 mg/m²) at the time of cyclophosphamide administration and then again, 4 h later, or placebo at days 0, 15, 30, and 60. Random assignment was stratified according to the severity of IPF and was block-balanced with variable block sizes of four or six patients. Patients receiving mechanical ventilation, with active infection, with active cancer, or who were registered on the lung transplant waiting list were excluded. All patients received standardised high-dose glucocorticoids. The investigators, patients, and the sponsor were masked to the treatment assignments. The primary endpoint was 3-month all-cause mortality, analysed by a χ² test adhering to an intention-to-treat principle. The trial is now complete and registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02460588.

FINDINGS

Between Jan 22, 2016, and July 19, 2018, 183 patients were assessed for eligibility, of whom 120 patients were randomly assigned and 119 patients (62 [52%] with severe IPF) received at least one dose of cyclophosphamide (n=60) or placebo (n=59), all of whom were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. The 3-month all-cause mortality was 45% (27/60) in patients given cyclophosphamide compared with 31% (18/59) in the placebo group (difference 14·5% [95% CI -3·1 to 31·6]; p=0·10). Similar results were found after adjustment by IPF severity (odds ratio [OR] 1·89 [95% CI 0·89-4·04]). The risk of death at 3 months, independent of the treatment received, was higher with severe than non-severe IPF (OR 2·62 [1·12-6·12]) and was lower with the use of antifibrotic therapy (OR 0·33 [0·13-0·82]). Adverse events were similar between groups by 6 months (25 [42%] in the cyclophosphamide group vs 30 [51%] in the placebo group) and their proportion, including infections, did not differ. Overall infection was the main adverse event and occurred in 20 (33%) of 60 patients in the cyclophosphamide group versus 21 (36%) of 59 patients in the placebo group.

INTERPRETATION

In patients with acute exacerbation of IPF, adding intravenous cyclophosphamide pulses to glucocorticoids increased 3-month mortality. These findings provide evidence against the use of intravenous cyclophosphamide in such patients.

FUNDING

Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique of the French Ministry of Health (PHRC 2014-502), Roche Pharmaceuticals.