Rationale and design of a prospective clinical trial program to evaluate the glucose-lowering effects of colesevelam HCl in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Bile acid signaling and bariatric surgery

The rapid worldwide rise in obesity rates over the past few decades imposes an urgent need to develop effective strategies for treating obesity and associated metabolic complications. Bariatric surgical procedures, such as Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and vertical sleeve gastrectomy (VSG), currently provide the most effective treatment for obesity and type 2 diabetes (T2D), as well as for non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). However, the underlying mechanisms of the beneficial effects of bariatric surgery remain elusive. Recent studies have identified bile acids as potential signaling molecules involved in the beneficial effects of bariatric surgery. This review focuses on the most recent studies on the roles of bile acids and bile acid receptors Farnesoid X receptor (FXR) and G protein-coupled bile acid receptor 5 (TGR5) in bariatric surgery. We also discuss the possibility of modulating bile acid signaling as a pharmacological therapeutic approach to treating obesity and its associated metabolic complications.

Diurnal glucose profiles using continuous glucose monitoring to identify the glucose-lowering characteristics of colesevelam HCl (Welchol)

OBJECTIVES

The study's purpose was to identify the antihyperglycemic affects of colesevelam-HCl (C-HCl) by characterizing the diurnal and postprandial glucose patterns in type 2 diabetic subjects treated concomitantly with metformin, sulfonylurea, or a combination of metformin/sulfonylurea. A secondary aim was to determine whether C-HCl significantly increased the risk of hypoglycemia.

METHODS

A prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study employing continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) with ambulatory glucose profile (AGP) analysis was undertaken. Fifteen males and 6 females, age 60 ± 8 years, treated with metformin (n = 8), sulfonylurea (n = 2), or combination (n = 11) participated.

RESULTS

Treatment with C-HCl led to reductions in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) (7.5 ± 0.3 to 7.0 ± 0.4% P<.0001), LDL (90.9 ± 18.6 to 68.9 ± 15.2 mg/dL, P<.0007) and total cholesterol (169.2 ± 24.4 to 147.8 ± 21.5 mg/dL, P<.001). Significantly lower normalized diurnal (21 mg/dL/hour, P = .0006), nocturnal (19 mg/dL/hour, P = .0005), and daytime (22 mg/dL/hour, P = .0008) glucose exposure was detected immediately upon C-HCl administration. Additionally, there was a significant (P<.004) decline in postprandial glucose excursions (averaging 15% or -36 mg/dL/hour) pronounced at dinner following C-HCl administration. There was a nonsignificant increase in the incidence of hypoglycemia (0.4-1%), with no difference due to antihyperglycemic medications.

CONCLUSIONS

AGP analysis of CGM visually and quantitatively showed immediate and midterm impacts of C-HCl on basal and postprandial glucose patterns. This suggests a multifactorial glucose-lowering mechanism for C-HCl affecting both meal-related and basal glucose levels.

Interrupting bile-acid handling and lipid and glucose control: Effects of colesevelam on glucose levels

The digestive tract plays a key role in lipid metabolism and in cardiovascular risk through the physiology of bile acids on lipid absorption, enterohepatic recycling of bile acids, and cholesterol oxidation in synthesis of bile acids. Recent evidence associates the activation of farnesoid X receptor by bile acids with alterations in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglyceride metabolism, and glucose metabolism. Bile-acid sequestrants augment cholesterol excretion via enhanced conversion to bile acids to lower low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Several recent studies have demonstrated a role for the bile-acid sequestrant colesevelam hydrochloride in improving glycemic control as well as lipid profiles in subjects with type 2 diabetes. This work reviews the mechanisms of action of colesevelam hydrochloride in interrupting bile acid reabsorption and in lipid transport and glucose control.

TGR5 potentiates GLP-1 secretion in response to anionic exchange resins

Anionic exchange resins are bona fide cholesterol-lowering agents with glycemia lowering actions in diabetic patients. Potentiation of intestinal GLP-1 secretion has been proposed to contribute to the glycemia lowering effect of these non-systemic drugs. Here, we show that resin exposure enhances GLP-1 secretion and improves glycemic control in diet-induced animal models of “diabesity”, effects which are critically dependent on TGR5, a G protein-coupled receptor that is activated by bile acids. We identified the colon as a major source of GLP-1 secretion after resin treatment. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the boost in GLP-1 release by resins is due to both enhanced TGR5-dependent production of the precursor transcript of GLP-1 as well as to the local enrichment of TGR5 agonists in the colon. Thus, TGR5 represents an essential component in the pathway mediating the enhanced GLP-1 release in response to anionic exchange resins.

Potential new approaches to modifying intestinal GLP-1 secretion in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: focus on bile acid sequestrants

Type 2 diabetes mellitus is associated with a progressive decline in insulin-producing pancreatic β-cells, an increase in hepatic glucose production, and a decrease in insulin sensitivity. The incretin hormones glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) stimulate glucose-induced insulin secretion; however, in patients with type 2 diabetes, the incretin system is impaired by loss of the insulinotropic effects of GIP as well as a possible reduction in secretion of GLP-1. Agents that modify GLP-1 secretion may have a role in the management of type 2 diabetes. The currently available incretin-based therapies, GLP-1 receptor agonists (incretin mimetics) and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors (CD26 antigen inhibitors) [incretin enhancers], are safe and effective in the treatment of type 2 diabetes. However, they may be unable to halt the progression of type 2 diabetes, perhaps because they do not increase secretion of endogenous GLP-1. Therapies that directly target intestinal L cells to stimulate secretion of endogenous GLP-1 could possibly prove more effective than treatment with GLP-1 receptor agonists and DPP-4 inhibitors. Potential new approaches to modifying intestinal GLP-1 secretion in patients with type 2 diabetes include G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) agonists, α-glucosidase inhibitors, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) agonists, metformin, bile acid mimetics and bile acid sequestrants. Both the GPCR agonist AR231453 and the novel bile acid mimetic INT-777 have been shown to stimulate GLP-1 release, leading to increased insulin secretion and improved glucose tolerance in mice. Similarly, a study in insulin-resistant rats demonstrated that the bile acid sequestrant colesevelam increased GLP-1 secretion and improved glucose levels and insulin resistance. In addition, the bile acid sequestrant colestimide (colestilan) has been shown to increase GLP-1 secretion and decrease glucose levels in patients with type 2 diabetes; these results suggest that the glucose-lowering effects of bile acid sequestrants may be partly due to their ability to increase endogenous GLP-1 levels. Evidence suggests that GPCR agonists, α-glucosidase inhibitors, PPAR agonists, metformin, bile acid mimetics and bile acid sequestrants may represent a new approach to management of type 2 diabetes via modification of endogenous GLP-1 secretion.

Bile acid sequestrants: more than simple resins

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Bile acid sequestrants (BAS) have been used for more than 50 years in the treatment of hypercholesterolemia. The last decade, bile acids are emerging as integrated regulators of metabolism via induction of various signal transduction pathways. Consequently, BAS treatment may exert unexpected side-effects. We discuss a selection of recently published studies that evaluated BAS in several metabolic diseases.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recently, an increasing body of evidence has shown that BAS in addition to ameliorating hypercholesterolemia are also effective in improving glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes, although the mechanism is not completely understood. Furthermore, some reports suggested using these compounds to modulate energy expenditure. Many of these effects have been related to the local effects of BAS in the intestine by directly binding bile acids in the intestine or indirectly by interfering with signaling processes.

SUMMARY

A substantial effort is being made by researchers to fully define the mechanism by which BAS improve glycemic control in type 2 diabetic patients. A new challenge will be to confirm in clinical trials the recent discoveries coming from animal experiments suggesting a role for bile acids in energy metabolism.

Inhibition of apical sodium-dependent bile acid transporter as a novel treatment for diabetes

Bile acids are recognized as metabolic modulators. The present study was aimed at evaluating the effects of a potent Asbt inhibitor (264W94), which blocks intestinal absorption of bile acids, on glucose homeostasis in Zucker Diabetic Fatty (ZDF) rats. Oral administration of 264W94 for two wk increased fecal bile acid concentrations and elevated non-fasting plasma total Glp-1. Treatment of 264W94 significantly decreased HbA1c and glucose, and prevented the drop of insulin levels typical of ZDF rats in a dose-dependent manner. An oral glucose tolerance test revealed up to two-fold increase in plasma total Glp-1 and three-fold increase in insulin in 264W94 treated ZDF rats at doses sufficient to achieve glycemic control. Tissue mRNA analysis indicated a decrease in farnesoid X receptor (Fxr) activation in small intestines and the liver but co-administration of a Fxr agonist (GW4064) did not attenuate 264W94 induced glucose lowering effects. In summary, our results demonstrate that inhibition of Asbt increases bile acids in the distal intestine, promotes Glp-1 release and may offer a new therapeutic strategy for type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Review of Medications Used in the Treatment of Diabetes Mellitus

Objective:

To review the pathophysiology of diabetes mellitus and outline currently available medications used in its treatment.

Data Sources:

A MEDLINE/PubMed search (1966-December 2009) was conducted for English-language articles using the terms diabetes mellitus, pharmacotherapy, metformin, thiazolidinedione, sulfonylurea, meglitinide, α-glucosidase inhibitor, DPP-4 inhibitor, colesevelam, bromocriptine, exenatide, pramlintide, and insulin. Book chapters relevant to the pathophysiology and pharmacologic treatment of diabetes were also searched.

Study Selection and Data Extraction:

Articles and chapters pertinent to the pharmacologic management of diabetes mellitus were reviewed.

Data Synthesis:

Type 1 diabetes is characterized by an absolute lack of insulin production by the β-cells of the pancreas, requiring insulin therapy. Type 2 diabetes is characterized by both insulin resistance and a relative or absolute lack of insulin secretion. Because type 2 diabetes involves both insulin resistance and decreased insulin production over time, people with type 2 diabetes can be treated with a variety of drugs currently on the market. Therapies currently on the market include metformin, thiazolidinediones, sulfonylureas, meglitinides, α-glucosidase inhibitors, DPP-4 inhibitors, colesevelam, bromocriptine, exenatide, pramlintide, and insulin.

Conclusions:

Given the multitude of medications available for the treatment of diabetes, it is important that pharmacy technicians and pharmacists be aware of the various agents currently on the market. With a solid foundation of knowledge regarding diabetes medications, a huge impact can be made on the quality of care of the customers and patients the pharmacy serves.

Characterization of cardiovascular outcomes in a type 2 diabetes glucose supply and insulin demand model

BACKGROUND

The nonsignificant reduction in macrovascular outcomes observed in Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes; Action in Diabetes and Vascular Disease: Preterax and Diamicron Modified Release Controlled Evaluation; and the Veterans Affairs Diabetes Trial have collectively created uncertainty with respect toward the proper extent of blood glucose reduction and also the optimal therapeutic choice to attain the reduction. In the article entitled "Glucose Supply and Insulin Demand Dynamics of Antidiabetic Agents" in this issue of Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology, we presented data for a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model that characterizes the effect of conventional antidiabetic therapies on the glucose supply and insulin demand dynamic. Here, it is our objective to test the hypothesis that, in conjunction with hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), patients managed on the glucose supply side of the model would have fewer cardiovascular events versus those managed on the insulin demand side.

METHODS

To test this hypothesis, the electronic medical records of a group model health maintenance organization were queried to compile a population of patients meeting the following inclusion criteria: (1) type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), (2) known date of T2DM diagnosis; (3) ICD-9 or CPT code identification and chart review confirmation of a first major cardiovascular event (myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass graft, or angioplasty),(4) five years of continuous eligibility, and (5) on antidiabetic therapy at the beginning of the 5-year observation period. These patients were subsequently matched (1:1) to T2DM patients meeting the same criteria who had not experienced an event and were analyzed for differences in glucose control (HbA1C), the glucose supply:insulin demand dynamic (SD ratio), and categorical combinations of both parameters.

RESULTS

Fifty cardiovascular event patients met inclusion criteria and were matched to controls. No difference was observed for the average HbA1c or SD ratio between patients experiencing an event and controls (7.5 +/- 1.0% versus 7.3 +/- 0.9%, p = .275, and 1.2 +/- 0.3 versus 1.3 +/- 0.3, p = .205, respectively). Likewise, for categorical representations, there were no differences in event rate at the pre-identified breakpoints (HbA1c >or=7% versus <7%; 72% versus 64%, p = .391, and SD ratio >or=1 versus <1; 68% versus 76%, p = .373, >or=1.25 versus <1.25; 42% versus 56%, p = .161, >or=1.5 versus <1.5; 22% versus 30%, p = .362, respectively). Analyzing the combined effect of glucose control and the SD dynamic, patients managed at higher glucose values and on the insulin demand side of the model (HbA1c >or=7% and SD ratio <1.25) tended to have greater cardiovascular risk than those managed at an HbA1c <7%, or HbA1c >or=7% with an SD ratio >or=1.25 (61% versus 39%; p = .096).

CONCLUSION

Independently, more aggressive HbA1c reduction and higher SD ratio values were not independently associated with a reduction in cardiovascular outcomes. Combining the parameters, it would appear that patients managed at higher glucose values and on the insulin demand side of the model may have increased cardiovascular risk. Based on these findings, it is pertinent to conduct subsequent works to refine SD ratio estimates and apply the model to larger, long-term T2DM cardiovascular outcome trials. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2010;4(2):382-390.

Colesevelam HCl improves fasting plasma glucose and lipid levels in patients with prediabetes

Although colesevelam hydrochloride (HCl) is indicated to reduce low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) in patients with hyperlipidemia and improve glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes, its effects on glucose and lipids in patients with prediabetes have not been previously studied. To evaluate the effects of colesevelam HCl in patients with prediabetes, a post-hoc analysis was conducted on data from a 24-week lipid-lowering study. Using baseline laboratory safety data for fasting plasma glucose (FPG), 88 patients were identified as having prediabetes according to American Diabetes Association criteria. Fasting plasma glucose was reduced by 4.0 mg/dL with colesevelam HCl 3.8 g/day and by 6.1 mg/dL with colesevelam HCl 4.5 g/day compared with placebo. Additionally, LDL-C was reduced by 13.2% and 12.0% with colesevelam HCl 3.8 and 4.5 g/day, respectively, versus placebo. Colesevelam HCl 3.8 g/day also significantly reduced total cholesterol and apolipoprotein (apo)B levels, whereas no significant difference in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, apoA-I, or triglyceride levels was observed versus placebo. In patients with hyperlipidemia and prediabetes, colesevelam HCl improved glycemic control and the lipid profile.

Pharmacotherapy of hyperglycemia

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a chronic, progressive disorder that affects more than 230 million people worldwide and is expected to affect 366 million by 2030. Both the prevalence of T2DM and the cost of its long term complications has driven the focus and emphasis on treatments aimed at reducing hyperglycemia and controlling hypertension and dyslipidemia. In the last 5 years new glucose lowering drugs acting on novel pathways have been developed, licensed and launched. These drugs include the glucagon-like peptide (GLP-1) agonists, exenatide, and dipeptidyl peptidase (DPP-IV) inhibitors such as sitagliptin and saxagliptin. This review describes current approaches to T2DM treatment, focusing on newer agents which tend to be associated with less hypoglycemia and possible weight loss, and addresses the potential roles of novel oral pharmacologic agents in the late-stages of development that might provide new options for the management of this disease.

Colesevelam hydrochloride for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus

BACKGROUND

Colesevelam hydrochloride is a bile acid sequestrant approved in January 2008 by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of adult patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) in combination with a sulfonylurea, metformin, and/or insulin therapy.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this article was to review the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, efficacy, adverse effects and tolerability, drug-drug interactions, contraindications/precautions, dosage and administration, pharmacoeconomics, and the overall role of colesevelam in the management of adult patients with type 2 DM.

METHODS

A literature search using MEDLINE (1966-October 27, 2008), PubMed (1950-October 27, 2008), Science Direct (1994-October 27, 2008), Web of Science (1980-October 27, 2008), American Diabetes Association Scientific Abstracts (2004-2008), and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (1970-October 27, 2008) was performed using the term colesevelam. English-language, original research and review articles were examined, and citations from these articles were assessed. Manufacturer prescribing information and the FDA review of the new drug application for colesevelam were also examined.

RESULTS

Colesevelam is a hydrophilic, water-insoluble polymer, with negligible absorption and systemic distribution, that is excreted primarily in the feces. Through a mechanism still under investigation, colesevelam effectively lowers glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA(1c)) when used in combination with a sulfonylurea, metformin, and/or insulin therapy. Three completed, published Phase III clinical trials investigating colesevelam for the treatment of type 2 DM were evaluated for information, data, and conclusions. At dosing of 1.875 g BID or 3.75 g once daily in combination with one of the aforementioned agents versus placebo, reductions in HbA(1c) in all 3 Phase III clinical trials of colesevelam ranged from 0.5% to 0.7% (P < 0.02). In clinical trials, colesevelam was well tolerated, with hypoglycemia occurring in approximately 3% of studied patients.

CONCLUSIONS

When used in combination with a sulfonylurea, metformin, and/or insulin therapy, colesevelam has been reported to significantly reduce HbA(1c) in adult patients with type 2 DM. Colesevelam's role in the management of type 2 DM remains undefined, however; further investigation into its mechanism of action and long-term efficacy and safety should be performed.

Reducing cardiovascular complications of type 2 diabetes by targeting multiple risk factors

Insulin resistance syndrome is characterized by hyperglycemia, atherogenic dyslipidemia, hypertension, and abdominal obesity. Hyperglycemia is the major risk factor for microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes. However, 70% to 80% of patients with type 2 diabetes will die of macrovascular disease. Atherogenic dyslipidemia-characterized by elevated triglyceride levels, low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-c) levels, and a preponderance of small, dense, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) particles-is the major cause of atherosclerosis in individuals with type 2 diabetes. Therefore, treatment of type 2 diabetes must address hyperglycemia to prevent microvascular disease (retinopathy, neuropathy, and nephropathy) and atherogenic dyslipidemia to prevent macrovascular complications. Emerging evidence indicates lipid and glucose homeostasis are interrelated via bile acid-activated nuclear hormone receptor signaling pathways. Agents that act on these pathways could simultaneously address hyperglycemia and dyslipidemia in patients with type 2 diabetes. Recent studies have shown that bile acid sequestrants, including cholestyramine, colestimide, and colesevelam HCl, significantly improve glycemic control and reduce LDL cholesterol levels in patients with type 2 diabetes. This paper will review the effects of bile acid sequestrants on both glucose and lipid metabolism in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Novel pathways for glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes: focus on bile acid modulation

Type 2 diabetes is a common disorder with high risk of macrovascular and microvascular complications. These complications are largely driven by hyperglycaemia, dyslipidaemia and hypertension, for which aggressive treatment is thus warranted. Achieving and maintaining control of all three risk factors is especially difficult, however, and new therapeutic approaches could be useful. Bile acids have a well-established and important role in cholesterol homeostasis. Normally, their levels are maintained primarily by ileal reabsorption and enterohepatic recycling. Bile acid sequestrants bind bile acids in the intestine, reduce this recycling and deplete the bile acid pool, thereby stimulating use of hepatic cholesterol for bile acid synthesis, which leads to accelerated removal of LDL from the plasma and a decrease in LDL-cholesterol levels. Interestingly, recent evidence suggests that bile acid sequestrants can lower glucose levels to a clinically meaningful degree. This review presents this evidence and the possible mechanisms by which these glucose-lowering effects occur and discusses the apparently unique ability of bile acid sequestrants among lipid-lowering agents to significantly improve two cardiovascular risk factors, hyperglycaemia and dyslipidaemia. There is renewed interest in the use of bile acid sequestrants in individuals with type 2 diabetes, most of whom would benefit from additional reductions in both LDL-cholesterol and glycaemia.

Evolving concepts of type 2 diabetes management with oral medications: new approaches to an old disease

BACKGROUND

Type 2 diabetes is often accompanied by co-morbid conditions such as hypertension and dyslipidemia, which, coupled with persistent hyperglycemia, result in significant macrovascular and microvascular complications. Type 2 diabetes treatments focus primarily on controlling hyperglycemia, hypertension, and dyslipidemia to stabilize the disease and minimize complications. Despite treatment, control of hyperglycemia and the conditions associated with type 2 diabetes are suboptimal in the majority of patients. Research efforts have concentrated on the development of new therapies for type 2 diabetes, including agents that could be used both as monotherapy and in combination with established oral antidiabetic agents to improve glycemic control and reduce the disease burden on patients.

OBJECTIVE

To review published literature on oral agents in development for type 2 diabetes, with a focus on their mechanism of action and impact on concomitant risk factors.

METHODS

After identifying oral agents in late-stage development for type 2 diabetes using the R&D Insight database, a literature review was conducted through PubMed for studies (preferably randomized, controlled trials) on dipeptidyl peptidase-IV inhibitors, CB(1) cannabinoid receptor blockers, and bile acid sequestrants. Where limited published data were available, abstracts from recent major conferences were searched. Other emerging therapies targeting pathways involved in modifying insulin resistance, glycogenolysis, and gluconeogenesis are also discussed.

CONCLUSIONS

A variety of novel therapies for type 2 diabetes are in development, which will provide patients and diabetes care providers more choices for the management of this disease. Importantly, many of these treatments offer the potential to significantly improve multiple metabolic parameters.

More choices than ever before: emerging therapies for type 2 diabetes

The goal of antidiabetes therapy is to reduce glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA(1c)) levels to prevent or minimize the microvascular complications associated with this disease, such as retinopathy, nephropathy, and neuropathy. Glycemic control, defined by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) as HbA(1c) <7.0%, is often difficult to achieve despite current treatments, including oral antidiabetes agents, such as biguanides (metformin), sulfonylureas, thiazolidinediones, dipeptidyl peptidase-IV (DPP-IV) inhibitors, meglitinides, and alpha-glucosidase inhibitors, as well as injectable agents, such as glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) analogues and insulin. In addition, antidiabetes treatments often become less effective over time as insulin resistance increases and pancreatic beta-cell function deteriorates. The latest ADA guidelines also recommend a range of interventions to control the multiple coexisting conditions associated with this chronic, progressive disease, including dyslipidemia and hypertension. This review highlights the new antidiabetes drug classes, which include incretin mimetics, cannabinoid receptor type 1 antagonists, and bile acid sequestrants, and compares these agents to established treatments with regard to efficacy and tolerability. The more recently developed antidiabetes drugs have been shown in clinical trials to produce glucose-lowering effects similar to those of established antidiabetes agents. Many of the new antidiabetes agents can be safely combined with established therapies to further improve glycemic control. In addition, the new agents may provide additional significant cardiometabolic benefits, including improving the lipid profile, lowering blood pressure, and reducing body weight. These new treatments may have the potential to greatly improve the management of type 2 diabetes.

Safety of niacin and simvastatin combination therapy

Niacin is the most potent lipid-altering agent for raising high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels. Niacin also lowers triglyceride (TG) levels, lowers low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels, and improves lipoprotein particle size and subclass distribution. Niacin's major adverse experience (AE) is flushing. Niacin may also increase glucose levels, liver enzymes, and uric acid levels and cause other AEs that may have clinical relevance in selected patients. Simvastatin is representative of the 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor (statin) class of lipid-altering drugs, which are the most effective agents for lowering LDL cholesterol levels and also have modest benefits in raising HDL cholesterol and lowering TG levels. The most common AEs with statins are muscle AEs and modest liver enzyme elevations. Because niacin and statins have complementary lipid effects and because individually, niacin and statins have been shown in outcomes studies to reduce atherosclerotic coronary artery disease events, the combined use of these 2 agents has significant potential to not only improve the lipid values of patients but improve their lives as well. Equally important is ensuring that the combination of niacin and simvastatin has an acceptable safety profile, with no greater AEs than would otherwise be expected by adding 1 agent to the other.