Recognition of essential purines by the U1A protein

Tackling Undruggable Targets with Designer Peptidomimetics and Synthetic Biologics

The development of potent, specific, and pharmacologically viable chemical probes and therapeutics is a central focus of chemical biology and therapeutic development. However, a significant portion of predicted disease-causal proteins have proven resistant to targeting by traditional small molecule and biologic modalities. Many of these so-called "undruggable" targets feature extended, dynamic protein-protein and protein-nucleic acid interfaces that are central to their roles in normal and diseased signaling pathways. Here, we discuss the development of synthetically stabilized peptide and protein mimetics as an ever-expanding and powerful region of chemical space to tackle undruggable targets. These molecules aim to combine the synthetic tunability and pharmacologic properties typically associated with small molecules with the binding footprints, affinities and specificities of biologics. In this review, we discuss the historical and emerging platforms and approaches to design, screen, select and optimize synthetic "designer" peptidomimetics and synthetic biologics. We examine the inspiration and design of different classes of designer peptidomimetics: (i) macrocyclic peptides, (ii) side chain stabilized peptides, (iii) non-natural peptidomimetics, and (iv) synthetic proteomimetics, and notable examples of their application to challenging biomolecules. Finally, we summarize key learnings and remaining challenges for these molecules to become useful chemical probes and therapeutics for historically undruggable targets.

Rationally designed inhibitors of the Musashi protein-RNA interaction by hotspot mimicry

RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) are key post-transcriptional regulators of gene expression, and thus underlie many important biological processes. Here, we developed a strategy that entails extracting a "hotspot pharmacophore" from the structure of a protein-RNA complex, to create a template for designing small-molecule inhibitors and for exploring the selectivity of the resulting inhibitors. We demonstrate this approach by designing inhibitors of Musashi proteins MSI1 and MSI2, key regulators of mRNA stability and translation that are upregulated in many cancers. We report this novel series of MSI1/MSI2 inhibitors is specific and active in biochemical, biophysical, and cellular assays. This study extends the paradigm of "hotspots" from protein-protein complexes to protein-RNA complexes, supports the "druggability" of RNA-binding protein surfaces, and represents one of the first rationally-designed inhibitors of non-enzymatic RNA-binding proteins. Owing to its simplicity and generality, we anticipate that this approach may also be used to develop inhibitors of many other RNA-binding proteins; we also consider the prospects of identifying potential off-target interactions by searching for other RBPs that recognize their cognate RNAs using similar interaction geometries. Beyond inhibitors, we also expect that compounds designed using this approach can serve as warheads for new PROTACs that selectively degrade RNA-binding proteins.

Rationally designed inhibitors of the Musashi protein-RNA interaction by hotspot mimicry

RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) are key post-transcriptional regulators of gene expression, and thus underlie many important biological processes. Here, we developed a strategy that entails extracting a "hotspot pharmacophore" from the structure of a protein-RNA complex, to create a template for designing small-molecule inhibitors and for exploring the selectivity of the resulting inhibitors. We demonstrate this approach by designing inhibitors of Musashi proteins MSI1 and MSI2, key regulators of mRNA stability and translation that are upregulated in many cancers. We report this novel series of MSI1/MSI2 inhibitors is specific and active in biochemical, biophysical, and cellular assays. This study extends the paradigm of "hotspots" from protein-protein complexes to protein-RNA complexes, supports the "druggability" of RNA-binding protein surfaces, and represents one of the first rationally-designed inhibitors of non-enzymatic RNA-binding proteins. Owing to its simplicity and generality, we anticipate that this approach may also be used to develop inhibitors of many other RNA-binding proteins; we also consider the prospects of identifying potential off-target interactions by searching for other RBPs that recognize their cognate RNAs using similar interaction geometries. Beyond inhibitors, we also expect that compounds designed using this approach can serve as warheads for new PROTACs that selectively degrade RNA-binding proteins.

Co-evolution of SNF spliceosomal proteins with their RNA targets in trans-splicing nematodes

Although the mechanism of pre-mRNA splicing has been well characterized, the evolution of spliceosomal proteins is poorly understood. The U1A/U2B″/SNF family (hereafter referred to as the SNF family) of RNA binding spliceosomal proteins participates in both the U1 and U2 small interacting nuclear ribonucleoproteins (snRNPs). The highly constrained nature of this system has inhibited an analysis of co-evolutionary trends between the proteins and their RNA binding targets. Here we report accelerated sequence evolution in the SNF protein family in Phylum Nematoda, which has allowed an analysis of protein:RNA co-evolution. In a comparison of SNF genes from ecdysozoan species, we found a correlation between trans-splicing species (nematodes) and increased phylogenetic branch lengths of the SNF protein family, with respect to their sister clade Arthropoda. In particular, we found that nematodes (~70-80 % of pre-mRNAs are trans-spliced) have experienced higher rates of SNF sequence evolution than arthropods (predominantly cis-spliced) at both the nucleotide and amino acid levels. Interestingly, this increased evolutionary rate correlates with the reliance on trans-splicing by nematodes, which would alter the role of the SNF family of spliceosomal proteins. We mapped amino acid substitutions to functionally important regions of the SNF protein, specifically to sites that are predicted to disrupt protein:RNA and protein:protein interactions. Finally, we investigated SNF's RNA targets: the U1 and U2 snRNAs. Both are more divergent in nematodes than arthropods, suggesting the RNAs have co-evolved with SNF in order to maintain the necessarily high affinity interaction that has been characterized in other species.

Climbing the vertebrate branch of U1A/U2B″ protein evolution

In the vertebrate lineage of the U1A/U2B″/SNF protein family, the U1A and U2B″ proteins bind to RNA stem-loops in the U1 or U2 snRNPs, respectively. However, their specialization is fairly recent, as they evolved from a single ancestral protein. The progress of their specialization (subfunctionalization) can be monitored by the amino acid sequence changes that give rise to their modern RNA-binding specificity. Using ancestral sequence reconstruction to predict the intermediates on the evolutionary branch, a probable path of sequential changes is defined for U1A and U2B″. The RNA-binding affinity for U1A/U2B″ protein ancestors was measured using modern U1 and U2 snRNA stem-loops and RNA stem-loop variants to understand how the proteins' RNA specificities evolved.

Analysis of protein-RNA complexes involving a RNA recognition motif engineered to bind hairpins with seven- and eight-nucleotide loops

U1A binds U1hpII, a hairpin RNA with a 10-nucleotide loop. A U1A mutant (ΔK50ΔM51) binds U1hpII-derived hairpins with shorter loops, making it an interesting scaffold for engineering or evolving proteins that bind similarly sized disease-related hairpin RNAs. However, a more detailed understanding of complexes involving ΔK50ΔM51 is likely a prerequisite to generating such proteins. Toward this end, we measured mutational effects for complexes involving U1A ΔK50ΔM51 and U1hpII-derived hairpin RNAs with seven- or eight-nucleotide loops and identified contacts that are critical to the stabilization of these complexes. Our data provide valuable insight into sequence-selective recognition of seven- or eight-nucleotide loop hairpins by an engineered RNA binding protein.

The role of the C-terminal helix of U1A protein in the interaction with U1hpII RNA

Previous kinetic investigations of the N-terminal RNA Recognition Motif (RRM) domain of spliceosomal A protein of the U1 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein particle (U1A) interacting with its RNA target U1 hairpin II (U1hpII) provided experimental evidence for a ‘lure and lock’ model of binding. The final step of locking has been proposed to involve conformational changes in an α-helix immediately C-terminal to the RRM domain (helix C), which occludes the RNA binding surface in the unbound protein. Helix C must shift its position to accommodate RNA binding in the RNA–protein complex. This results in a new hydrophobic core, an intraprotein hydrogen bond and a quadruple stacking interaction between U1A and U1hpII. Here, we used a surface plasmon resonance-based biosensor to gain mechanistic insight into the role of helix C in mediating the interaction with U1hpII. Truncation, removal or disruption of the helix exposes the RNA-binding surface, resulting in an increase in the association rate, while simultaneously reducing the ability of the complex to lock, reflected in a loss of complex stability. Disruption of the quadruple stacking interaction has minor kinetic effects when compared with removal of the intraprotein hydrogen bonds. These data provide new insights into the mechanism whereby sequences C-terminal to an RRM can influence RNA binding.

Efficient transcription through an intron requires the binding of an Sm-type U1 snRNP with intact stem loop II to the splice donor

The mechanism behind the positive action of introns upon transcription and the biological significance of this positive feedback remains unclear. Functional ablation of splice sites within an HIV-derived env cDNA significantly reduced transcription that was rescued by a U1 snRNA modified to bind to the mutated splice donor (SD). Using this model we further characterized both the U1 and pre-mRNA structural requirements for transcriptional enhancement. U1 snRNA rescued as a mature Sm-type snRNP with an intact stem loop II. Position and sequence context for U1-binding is crucial because a promoter proximal intron placed upstream of the mutated SD failed to rescue transcription. Furthermore, U1-rescue was independent of promoter and exon sequence and is partially replaced by the transcription elongation activator Tat, pointing to an intron-localized block in transcriptional elongation. Thus, transcriptional coupling of U1 snRNA binding to the SD may licence the polymerase for transcription through the intron.