The association of spatial T wave axis deviation with incident coronary events. The ARIC cohort

Advanced electrocardiography heart age: a prognostic, explainable machine learning approach applicable to sinus and non-sinus rhythms

Aims

An explainable advanced electrocardiography (A-ECG) Heart Age gap is the difference between A-ECG Heart Age and chronological age. This gap is an estimate of accelerated cardiovascular aging expressed in years of healthy human aging, and can intuitively communicate cardiovascular risk to the general population. However, existing A-ECG Heart Age requires sinus rhythm. We aim to develop and prognostically validate a revised, explainable A-ECG Heart Age applicable to both sinus and non-sinus rhythms.

Methods and results

An A-ECG Heart Age excluding P-wave measures was derived from the 10-s 12-lead ECG in a derivation cohort using multivariable regression machine learning with Bayesian 5-min 12-lead A-ECG Heart Age as reference. The Heart Age was externally validated in a separate cohort of patients referred for cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging by describing its association with heart failure hospitalization or death using Cox regression, and its association with comorbidities. In the derivation cohort (n = 2771), A-ECG Heart Age agreed with the 5-min Heart Age (R 2 = 0.91, bias 0.0 ± 6.7 years), and increased with increasing comorbidity. In the validation cohort [n = 731, mean age 54 ± 15 years, 43% female, n = 139 events over 5.7 (4.8-6.7) years follow-up], increased A-ECG Heart Age gap (≥10 years) associated with events [hazard ratio, HR (95% confidence interval, CI) 2.04 (1.38-3.00), C-statistic 0.58 (0.54-0.62)], and the presence of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hypercholesterolaemia, and heart failure (P ≤ 0.009 for all).

Conclusion

An explainable A-ECG Heart Age gap applicable to both sinus and non-sinus rhythm associates with cardiovascular risk, cardiovascular morbidity, and survival.

Frontal plane T-wave axis orientation predicts coronary events: Findings from the Moli-sani study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The orientation of the frontal plane T-wave axis (T axis) is a reliable measure of ventricular repolarisation. We investigated the association between T-axis and the risk of coronary heart disease (CHD), heart failure (HF), atrial fibrillation (AF), stroke and cardiovascular (CVD) mortality.

METHODS

A sample of 21,287 Moli-sani participants randomly recruited from the general adult (≥35 y) Italian population, free of CVD disease, were followed for a median of 4.4 years. T-axis was measured from a standard 12-lead resting ECG.

RESULTS

After adjusting for CVD risk factors, subjects with abnormal T-axis showed an increase in the risk of both CHD (Hazard Ratio (HR) = 2.65; 95% CI = 1.67-4.21), HF (HR = 2.56; 1.80-3.63), AF (HR = 2.48; 1.56-3.94) and CVD mortality (HR = 2.83; 1.50-5.32). The association with CHD and HF, but not with AF or CVD death, remained significant after further adjustment for ECG abnormalities. Subjects with abnormal T-axis showed higher levels of subclinical inflammation, hs-troponin I and hs-NT-proBNP (p < 0.001 for all). However, further adjustment for troponin I and/or NT-proBNP determined a reduction of HRs ranging from 12.1 to 24.0% for CHD, while additional adjustment for inflammation markers did not change any association.

CONCLUSIONS

An abnormal T-axis orientation is associated with an increased risk of both CHD and HF, independently of common CVD risk factors and other ECG abnormalities. This association was partially explained by increased hs-troponin I and hs-NT-proBNP levels.

T wave axis deviation and QRS-T angle - Controversial indicators of incident coronary heart events

Abnormal orientation of the T-wave axis and increased angle between the QRS complex (depolarization) and the T-wave (repolarization) have long been assumed to provide a global measure of repolarization abnormality, and have been used to assess ventricular repolarization. The ability of the T wave axis deviation and the QRS-T angle to predict incident coronary heart events was examined in several studies. However, conflicting results have led to significant controversy in the literature concerning their purported ability. Potential explanations involve true variation between study populations, non-standardized cut-off values, different baseline cardiovascular risk levels or different patterns of confounding by other concomitant cardiovascular risk factors. In the present article we will attempt to briefly present the rationale and pathophysiology behind these indices, summarize existing knowledge regarding their prognostic significance and their correlation with established cardiovascular disease risk factors. Further prospective studies are necessary to confirm or refute whether T-wave axis deviation, QRS-T angle and ventricular gradient may in the future serve as indicators of incident coronary heart events and mortality, both in populations with higher prevalence of subclinical advanced atherosclerotic heart disease and in apparently healthy subjects.

Changes of Virtual Planar QRS and T Vectors Derived from Holter in the Populations with and without Diabetes Mellitus

Aims

Research related to type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) and parameters of electrocardiography (ECG) was limited. Patients with and without DM (NDM) were randomly enrolled in a study to exploit the influence of DM on planar QRS and T vectors derived from the Virtual Holter process.

Methods

A total of 216 (NDM) and 127 DM patients were consecutively and randomly recruited. We selected a 1‐minute length of ECG, which was scheduled for analysis at 4 AM. After a series of calculating algorisms, we received the virtual planar vector parameters.

Results

Patients with DM were elderly (65.61 ± 12.08 vs 59.41 ± 16.86 years, P < 0.001); higher morbidity of hypertension (76.38% vs 58.14%, P < 0.001) and coronary artery disease (44.09% vs 32.41%, P = 0.03); thicker interventricular septum (10.92 ± 1.77 vs 10.08 ± 1.96 mm, P < 0.001) and left ventricular posterior wall (9.84 ± 1.38 vs 9.39 ± 1.66 mm, P = 0.03); higher lipid levels and average heart rate (66.67 ± 12.04 vs 61.87 ± 13.36 bpm, P < 0.01); higher angle of horizontal QRS vector (HQRSA, –2.87 ± 48.48 vs –19.00 ± 40.18 degrees, P < 0.01); lower maximal magnitude of horizontal T vector (HTV, 2.33 ± 1.47 vs 2.88 ± 1.89 mm, P = 0.01) and maximal magnitude of right side T vector (2.77 ± 1.55 vs 3.27 ± 1.92 mm, P = 0.03), and no difference in angle of frontal QRS‐T vector (FQRSTA, 32.77 ± 54.20 vs 28.39 ± 52.87 degrees, P = 0.74) compared with patients having NDM. After adjusting for confounding factors, DM was significantly effective on FQRSTA (regression coefficient –40.0, 95%CI –66.4 to –13.6, P < 0.01), HQRSA (regression coefficient 22.6, 95%CI 2.5 to 42.8, P = 0.03), and HTV (regression coefficient 0.9, 95%CI 0.2 to 1.7, P = 0.01). Confounding factors included: sex, 2‐hour postprandial blood glucose, smoking, triglyceride, apolipoprotein A, creatinine, left ventricular ejection fraction, and average heart rate.

Conclusions

The risk factors of DM and lipid metabolism abnormality particularly apolipoprotein A significantly modified parameters of virtual planar QRS and T vector, including frontal QRS‐T angle.

The spatial QRS-T angle: implications in clinical practice

The ventricular gradient (VG) as a concept was conceived in the 1930s and its calculation yielded information that was not otherwise obtainable. The VG was not utilized by clinicians at large because it was not easy to understand and its computation time-consuming. The contemporary spatial QRS-T angle is based on the concept of the VG and defined as its mathematical and physiological integral. Its current major clinical use is to assess the cardiac primary repolarization abnormalities in 3-dimensional spatial vectorial plans which are normally untraced in the presence of secondary electrophysiological activity in a 2-dimensional routine electrocardiogram (ECG). Currently the calculation of the spatial QRS-T angle can be easily computed on the basis of a classical ECG and contributes to localization of arrhythmogenic areas in the heart by assessing overall and local heterogeneity of the myocardial ventricular action potention duration. Recent population-based studies suggest that the spatial QRS-T angle is a dominant ECG predictor of future cardiovascular events and death and it is superior to more conventional ECG parameters. Its assessment warrants consideration for intensified primary and secondary cardiovascular prevention efforts and should be included in everyday clinical practice. This review addresses the nature and diagnostic potential of the spatial QRS-T angle. The main focus is its role in ECG assessment of dispersion of repolarization, a key factor in arrythmogeneity.

T-wave axis deviation, metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular risk: results from the MOLI-SANI study

Early recognition of patients at increased cardiovascular risk is a major challenge. The surface electrocardiogram provides a useful platform and it has been used to propose several indexes. T wave axis abnormality is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular mortality, independently of other risk factors and can be associated with the presence of the metabolic syndrome (MetS). We assessed the prevalence of T axis abnormalities and its relationship with MetS and its components in a large population of Italian adults. Data concerning 11,143 women (54 ± 11 years) and 9742 men (55 ± 11 years) randomly recruited from a general population (Moli-sani cohort) were analyzed. After excluding subjects with incomplete data and with history of cardiac disease or left ventricular hypertrophy, T-wave axis was normal in 74.5% of men and 80.9% of women, borderline in 23.6% and 17.3% and abnormal in 1.9% and 1.8%. In subjects with MetS, the prevalence of borderline or abnormal T-wave axis deviation was higher than in subjects without MetS (in men: 26.6% vs. 22.1% and 2.5% vs. 1.7%; in women: 25% vs. 15% and 2.4% vs. 1.6%, respectively for borderline and abnormal levels, p<0.0001). Each component of MetS increased the odds of having borderline or abnormal T-wave axis deviation by 1.21 in men and 1.31 in women. T wave axis deviation is associated with MetS and its individual components. These findings confirm previous reported results, expanding them to a large and representative sample of European population of Caucasian ethnicity.

Abnormal T-wave axis is associated with coronary artery calcification in older adults

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether T-wave axis on the resting electrocardiogram (ECG) is associated with coronary artery calcification (CAC) score, a measurement of coronary atherosclerosis, in older adults.

METHODS

The sample consisted of 2004 adults aged 66 and over participating in the prospective, population-based Age-Gene/Environment Susceptibility-Reykjavik Study. The cohort was divided into gender-stratified quartiles based upon Agatston CAC score derived from computerized tomography. Frontal T-axis deviation from 45 degrees was assessed using surface ECG. Statistical analysis was performed with Tobit regression models adjusted for demographic and cardiovascular risk factors.

RESULTS

In the entire study population, T-axis deviation from 45 degrees was significantly associated with increasing CAC score in men (p<0.001) and women (p=0.03). In men without clinically recognized coronary heart disease (CHD), the association with CAC score remained statistically significant (p=0.02). This association was significant among women without CHD once male CAC cut points were used (p=0.05).

CONCLUSION

An abnormal T-wave axis is associated with an increasing CAC score in this population of Icelandic older adults. This association remains in the subgroup of subjects without clinical CHD.

Recent ventricular repolarization markers in resistant hypertension: are they different from the traditional QT interval?

BACKGROUND

Two electrocardiographic markers of ventricular repolarization abnormalities have been recently proposed: spatial T-wave axis deviation and T(peak)-T(end)-interval duration. The aim of this study was to evaluate these markers in patients with resistant hypertension, particularly their relationships with left ventricular mass (LVM) and geometric patterns, in comparison with the more traditional marker, the QTc interval.

METHODS

In a cross-sectional study, 810 resistant hypertensive patients were evaluated. Clinical, laboratory, electrocardiographic, 24-h blood pressures and echocardiographic variables were obtained. Maximum T(peak)-T(end)-interval duration (Tpe(max)) was considered prolonged if it was beyond the upper quartile value (120 ms), and the spatial T-wave axis on the frontal plane was considered abnormally deviated if >105 degrees or < 15 degrees . Statistical analysis involved bivariate tests, multivariate logistic regression and analysis of covariance.

RESULTS

Tpe(max)-interval prolongation, like QTc-interval prolongation, was found to be associated with body mass index, 24-h systolic blood pressure (SBP), indexed LVM, serum potassium, and heart rate. Abnormal T-axis deviation was associated with male gender, presence of coronary heart disease, serum creatinine, 24-h SBP, LVM, and serum potassium. All three repolarization parameters were shown to be associated with increased LVM, after adjustment for possible confounders. However, when included together into the same model, only abnormal T-axis and QTc-interval prolongation remained independently associated with LVM. All three parameters were also increased in patients with concentric hypertrophy geometric pattern.

CONCLUSIONS

Both the recently proposed repolarization parameters are associated with increased LVM and hypertrophy in patients with resistant hypertension, but only abnormal T-wave axis deviation appears to have distinct and additive relationships to the more classic marker, the QTc interval. Their prognostic values should be addressed in prospective studies .

Comparison of the prognostic significance of the electrocardiographic QRS/T angles in predicting incident coronary heart disease and total mortality (from the atherosclerosis risk in communities study)

Spatial QRS/T angle and spatial T-wave axis were shown to be strong independent predictors of incident coronary heart disease (CHD) and total mortality, but they are not routinely available. We evaluated whether frontal plane QRS/T angle, easily obtained as the difference between frontal plane axes of QRS and T, provides a suitable substitute for spatial QRS/T angle as a risk predictor. Our study consisted of 13,973 participants from the ARIC Study. Outcome variables were incident CHD and total mortality during a median follow-up of 14 years. Electrocardiographic variables were categorized as abnormal (>/=95th percentile), borderline (>/=75th and <95th percentile), and normal (<75th percentile) separately for men and women. Cox regression was used to assess the effect of electrocardiographic variables on risk of each outcome. The normal category was considered the reference cell. With adjustment for demographic and clinical characteristics, both QRS/T angles were approximately equally strong predictors of total mortality with >50% increased risk. Spatial QRS/T angle was a stronger predictor of incident CHD in women, with a 114% increased risk, but it was not significantly associated with risk of incident CHD in men. Similarly, frontal plane QRS/T angle was statistically significant for only women with a 74% increased risk of incident CHD. In conclusion, frontal plane QRS/T angle as an easily derived risk measure is a suitable clinical substitute for spatial QRS/T angle for risk prediction.