CCC meets ICU: redefining the role of critical care of cancer patients

Outcome of patients with solid malignancies considered for intensive care unit admission: a single-center prospective cohort study

PURPOSE

To identify the predictors and outcomes of ICU triage decisions in patients with solid malignancies (SM) and to investigate the usefulness of the National Early Warning Score (NEWS) and quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) score at triage.

METHODS

All patients with SM for whom ICU admission was requested between July 2019 and December 2021 in a French university-affiliated hospital were included prospectively.

RESULTS

Of the 6262 patients considered for ICU admission, 410 (6.5%) had SM (age, 66 [58-73] years; metastases, 60.1%; and performance status 0-2, 81%). Of these 410 patients, 176 (42.9%) were admitted to the ICU, including 141 (80.1%) subsequently discharged alive. Breast cancer, hemoptysis, and pneumothorax were associated with ICU admission; whereas older age, performance status 3-4, metastatic disease, and request at night were associated with denial of ICU admission. The NEWS, and the qSOFA score in patients with suspected infection, determined at triage performed poorly for predicting hospital mortality (area under the receiver operating characteristics curve, 0.52 and 0.62, respectively). Performance status 3-4 was independently associated with higher 6-month mortality and first-line anticancer treatment with lower 6-month mortality. Hospital mortality was 33.3% in patients admitted to the ICU after refusal of the first request.

CONCLUSION

Patients with SM were frequently denied ICU admission despite excellent in-ICU survival. Poor performance status was associated with ICU admission denial and higher 6-month mortality, but none of the other reasons for denying ICU admission predicted 6-month mortality. Physiological scores had limited usefulness in this setting.

Characterisation and Outcomes of Patients with Solid Organ Malignancies Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit: Mortality and Impact on Functional Status and Oncological Treatment

BACKGROUND

Despite the increasing number of ICU admissions among patients with solid tumours, there is a lack of tools with which to identify patients who may benefit from critical support. We aim to characterize the clinical profile and outcomes of patients with solid malignancies admitted to the ICU.

METHODS

Retrospective observational study of patients with cancer non-electively admitted to the ICU of the Hospital Clinic of Barcelona (Spain) between January 2019 and December 2019. Data regarding patient and neoplasm characteristics, ICU admission features and outcomes were collected from medical records.

RESULTS

97 ICU admissions of 84 patients were analysed. Lung cancer (22.6%) was the most frequent neoplasm. Most of the patients had metastatic disease (79.5%) and were receiving oncological treatment (75%). The main reason for ICU admission was respiratory failure (38%). Intra-ICU and in-hospital mortality rates were 9.4% and 24%, respectively. Mortality rates at 1, 3 and 6 months were 19.6%, 36.1% and 53.6%. Liver metastasis, gastrointestinal cancer, hypoalbuminemia, elevated basal C-reactive protein, ECOG-PS greater than 2 at ICU admission, admission from ward and an APACHE II score over 14 were related to higher mortality. Functional status was severely affected at discharge, and oncological treatment was definitively discontinued in 40% of the patients.

CONCLUSION

Medium-term mortality and functional deterioration of patients with solid cancers non-electively admitted to the ICU are high. Surrogate markers of cachexia, liver metastasis and poor ECOG-PS at ICU admission are risk factors for mortality.

Importance of interdisciplinarity in modern oncology: results of a national intergroup survey of the Young Oncologists United (YOU)

PURPOSE

Modern, personalized treatment concepts in oncology require an interdisciplinary and multiprofessional collaboration. In addition to its relevance in patient care, interdisciplinary collaboration is also becoming increasingly important in clinical research as well as medical education and resident training in oncology.

METHODS

Between November 2021 and March 2022, an online survey was conducted among German early career research groups, represented by Young Oncologists United (YOU). The aim was to identify the status and need for interdisciplinarity at clinic, educational, and research levels.

RESULTS

A total of 294 participants completed the questionnaire in full. 90.7% of the respondents fully or predominantly agreed with the statement that interdisciplinary work plays a major role in their daily clinical work. 78.9% wished for more interdisciplinary collaboration. Of the 49.7% of participants who have never participated in an interdisciplinary research project, 80.1% said they would like to participate in such a study project in the future. Lack of time resources, too much organizational effort, and possible political conflicts between institutions were identified as factors that make practical implementation difficult. 74.1% declared their willingness to become active in an oncology early career research group.

CONCLUSION

Interdisciplinary collaboration has become increasingly important in oncology. Networks that span different disciplines could help to promote interdisciplinary research projects among young scientists and improve exchange in professional practice and education with the implication of improved patient care.

Comparação da Mortalidade entre Pacientes com Neoplasias submetidos à Ventilação Invasiva e não Invasiva: Estudo de Coorte Retrospectiva

Introdução: O paciente com câncer apresenta alta prevalência de insuficiência respiratória aguda (IRpA) relacionada a complicações do tratamento oncológico. O suporte ventilatório mecânico e a principal terapêutica para resolução dessas complicações. No entanto, tal recurso pode aumentar a mortalidade. Objetivo: Verificar a taxa de mortalidade e os fatores intervenientes de pacientes oncológicos com IRpA expostos a ventilação mecânica invasiva (VMI) e não invasiva (VNI). Método: Estudo de coorte retrospectiva. Foram incluídos 121 pacientes oncológicos em ventilação mecânica separados em grupos: neoplasias hematológicas em VMI (HVMI, n=17), neoplasias hematológicas em VNI (HVNI, n=36), neoplasias solidas em VMI (SVMI, n=39) e neoplasias solidas em VNI (SVNI, n=29). Os desfechos avaliados foram: taxa de mortalidade, tempo de internamento, tempo de exposição a ventilação mecânica, taxa de falha da VNI e fatores relacionados a falha da VNI. Resultados: A taxa de mortalidade geral foi de 47,9%, distribuídos em HVMI (82,4%), HVNI (27,8%), SVMI (69,2%) e SVNI (24,1%). O escore APACHE III elevado foi associado a uma maior taxa de mortalidade. A taxa de mortalidade associada a falha da VNI foi de 71,4% HVNI e 77,8% SVNI. As variáveis associadas a maior taxa de falha da VNI foram o APACHE III>7 e o tempo de exposição a VNI>72 horas. Conclusão: A taxa de mortalidade de pacientes com neoplasia hematológica e solida em IRpA mostrou-se menor em pacientes expostos a VNI.

Perspectives on Advance Care Planning for Patients with Hematologic Malignancy: An International Clinician Questionnaire

Rationale: Critical illness is common in patients with hematologic malignancy (HM). Advance care planning (ACP) can allow these patients to express their care preferences before life-threatening illnesses. Objectives: To evaluate physicians' perspectives surrounding ACP in patients with HM. Methods: We administered a survey to intensivists and hematologic oncologists who care for patients with HM across Canada and the United Kingdom. Potential respondents were identified from institutions that have a hematologic-oncology program. The survey was disseminated electronically. Results: A total of 111 physicians completed the survey, with a response rate of 19% (39% across those who opened the e-mail); 52% of respondents were intensivists, and 48% of respondents were hematologic oncologists. Of the responses, 15.5% of physicians reported that ACP happens routinely at their institution, whereas 8.3% of physicians stated that code status is routinely discussed. ACP discussions were most commonly reported at the onset of critical illness (84.3% of respondents), during disease recurrence (52.9% of respondents), or during the transition to a strictly palliative approach (54.9% of respondents). Commonly cited barriers to ACP centered on physicians' concern about the reaction of the patient or family. Conclusions: This study emphasizes the need for earlier and more frequent ACP discussions in this high-risk population with a variety of barriers identified.

[Cancer patients in the intensive care unit]

Over the past 20 years, demographic changes and a longer life expectancy of cancer patients has significantly increased the prevalence of this patient group in the intensive care unit (ICU). A fundamental finding is that acute organ dysfunction, rather than the underlying malignancy, determines the prognosis of ICU patients. While hematologic patients often suffer from a more severe disease course, patients with solid tumors do not present an increased hospital mortality compared to the normal population. As with other indications, the decision to transfer a cancer patient to an ICU should be made as soon as possible. While early transfer is associated with reduced hospital mortality, the presence of multiorgan failure on ICU admission is associated with increased mortality. Overall, the intensive care and hospital survival of critically ill hematologic or oncologic patients has improved over the last two decades and is now as high as 50 to 60%. After surviving an intensive care stay, one fifth of all patients have a good long-term prognosis. Thus, the former paradigm of general rejection of cancer patients for ICU care is no longer justified. For optimal care of cancer patients requiring intensive care, close cooperation between hematologists/oncologists and intensive care physicians is essential.

[Hemato-oncology and intensive care medicine : From taboo to indispensable]

Intensivmediziner werden im Kontext der Versorgung von kritisch kranken Krebspatienten vor eine zunehmende Bandbreite spezifischer Herausforderungen gestellt. Neben einer adäquaten Therapiezielfindung umfasst diese die Versorgung des akuten respiratorischen Versagens (ARV) mit speziellen differenzialdiagnostischen Überlegungen, das Management immunologischer Nebenwirkungen innovativer Krebstherapien sowie eine Vielzahl an Krankheitsbildern, die ausschließlich bei Krebspatienten auftreten. Um diesen Herausforderungen gerecht werden zu können, widmet sich die Initiative „Intensive Care in Hematologic and Oncologic Patients (iCHOP)“ seit einigen Jahren diesen Themen. Unterstützt durch mehrere österreichische und deutsche Fachgesellschaften für Intensivmedizin, Hämatologie und Onkologie wurde kürzlich der „1. Konsens zur Versorgung kritisch kranker Krebspatienten“ mit Empfehlungen zum klinischen Management sowie infrastrukturellen und ausbildungsassoziierten Themen verfasst. Das Auftreten eines ARV steht bei kritisch kranken Krebspatienten seit jeher im Fokus der Forschung. Während die nichtinvasive Beatmung lange als Goldstandard der Therapie galt, zeigen hochqualitative Studien jedoch keine relevanten klinischen Vorteile dieser Techniken inklusive der High-flow-nasal-oxygen-Therapie im Vergleich zur konventionellen Sauerstofftherapie. Hingegen rückt eine nichtgeklärte Ätiologie des ARV als einziger potenziell modifizierbarer Risikofaktor in den Fokus. Dementsprechend sind evidenzbasierte und rigoros angewendete Diagnosealgorithmen bei diesen Patienten von eminenter Bedeutung. Des Weiteren stellen das Erkennen und das Management der immer häufiger vorkommenden vielgestaltigen immuntherapieassoziierten Toxizität Intensivmediziner vor zunehmende Herausforderungen.

Critically Ill Pediatric Oncology Patients: What the Intensivist Needs to Know? Pediatric Critical Care Medicine

Cancer is an evolving cause of morbidity and mortality in children worldwide. In recent decades, there has been a significant increase in the survival of children with cancer, after applying new methods and treatment protocols in practice. However, the complexity of the disease itself, as well as the intensity and toxicity of treatment is such that many children require admission to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) which should be well equipped and led by personnel who have adequate training and expertise to provide optimum care to these complex patients. Most oncology patients who require PICU admission categorized into oncological emergencies, and/or decompensation from treatment and its side effects. In this study, we provide a summary of the essential and most recent evidence-based recommendations from published reviews and articles to aid PICU physicians and to ensure the best treatment and outcome possible for the children with such disease. How to cite this article: Al Haj Moussa A, Maaz AUR, Faqih N, Sundaram M. Critically Ill Pediatric Oncology Patients: What the Intensivist Needs to Know? Pediatric Critical Care Medicine. Indian J Crit Care Med 2020;24(12):1256-1263.

Characteristics and outcomes of patients with solid tumors receiving chemotherapy in the intensive care unit

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to evaluate the short- and long-term outcomes of adult patients with solid tumors receiving chemotherapy in the intensive care unit (ICU).

METHODS

This was a retrospective single-center study comparing the outcomes of patients with solid tumors who received chemotherapy in the ICU with a matched cohort of ICU patients (by age, sex, and tumor type) who did not receive chemotherapy. Conditional logistic regression and shared frailty Cox regression were used to assess short-term (ICU and hospital) mortality and death by 12-month post-hospital discharge, respectively.

RESULTS

Seventy-three patients with solid tumors who received chemotherapy in the ICU were successfully matched. The most common solid tumors included thoracic (30%), genitourinary (26%), and breast (16%). The ICU, hospital, and 12-month (post discharge)  mortality rates of patients who recieved chomtherapy in the ICU were 23%, 36%, and 43%, respectively. When compared to the matched cohort of patients who did not receive chemotherapy, patients who received chemotherapy had a significantly longer length of stay in the ICU (median 7 vs. 4 days, p < 0.001) and hospital (median 15 vs. 11 days, p = 0.011) but similar short-term ICU and hospital mortality rates (23% vs. 18% and 36% vs. 38%, respectively). Patients who received chemotherapy in the ICU were at a lower risk of death by 12 months (HR 0.31, p < 0.001) compared to the matched cohort on multivariable analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with solid tumors who received chemotherapy had increased ICU and hospital length of stay compared to patients who did not. Although short-term mortality did not differ, patients who received chemotherapy in the ICU had improved long-term survival. Our data can inform critical care triage decisions to include patients who are to receive chemotherapy in the ICU.

Characteristics and outcomes of patients with hematologic malignancies receiving chemotherapy in the intensive care unit

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to evaluate the short-term and long-term outcomes of adult patients with hematologic malignancies who received chemotherapy in the intensive care unit (ICU).

METHODS

This was a retrospective, single-center study comparing the outcomes of patients with hematologic malignancies who received chemotherapy in the ICU with a matched cohort of ICU patients who did not receive chemotherapy. Conditional logistic regression and shared-frailty Cox regression were used to assess short-term (ICU and hospital) mortality and death by 12 months after hospital discharge, respectively.

RESULTS

One hundred eighty-one patients with hematologic malignancies received chemotherapy in the ICU. The ICU and hospital mortality rates were 25% and 42% for chemotherapy patients and 22% and 33% for non-chemotherapy patients, respectively. Higher severity of illness scores on ICU admission were significantly associated with higher ICU mortality (odds ratio, 1.07; P < .001) and hospital mortality (odds ratio, 1.05; P ≤ .001). Six-month and 12-month survival estimates posthospital discharge were 58% and 50%, respectively. Compared with the matched cohort of patients who did not receive chemotherapy, those who did receive chemotherapy had a significantly longer length of stay in the ICU (median, 6 vs 3 days; P < .001) and in the hospital (median, 22 vs 14 days; P = .024). In multivariable analysis, the patients who received chemotherapy in the ICU had a trend toward a higher risk of dying by 12 months (hazard ratio, 1.45; P = .08).

CONCLUSIONS

Short-term mortality was similar among patients with hematologic malignancies who did and did not receive chemotherapy in the ICU, although patients who received chemotherapy had increased resource utilization. These results may inform ICU triage and goals-of-care discussions with patients and their families regarding outcomes after receiving chemotherapy in the ICU. Cancer 2018;124:3025-36. © 2018 American Cancer Society.

Consensus statement for cancer patients requiring intensive care support

This consensus statement is directed to intensivists, hematologists, and oncologists caring for critically ill cancer patients and focuses on the management of these patients.

Appropriateness of admissions of children with cancer to intensive care facilities in a resource-limited setting

<strong>Background:</strong> The increasing intensity of treatment of paediatric malignancies has led to improved survival rates, but often necessitates intensive supportive care. The decision to admit a child to the paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) is based on the probability of both short-term and long-term survival in the context of severe resource constraints. Resource constraints in South Africa result in limited access of children with cancer to PICU facilities.<br /><strong>Objectives:</strong> The aim of this study was to determine whether referrals by paediatric oncologists to a PICU in Johannesburg were appropriate by analysing indications for admission, underlying diagnoses, duration and costs of admissions, and overall outcomes.<br /><strong>Methods:</strong> A retrospective review of consecutive PICU admissions over a 12-year period was performed. Data from all patients with histologically proven malignant conditions were included and analysed using descriptive statistical methods, Kaplan–Meier curves, log-rank analysis and Fisher’s exact test.<br /><strong>Results:</strong> There were 5704 recorded admissions to PICU in the study period. Of these admissions, 120 (2.1%) were for patients with malignancies. The majority of PICU oncology admissions were for post-operative care, and the median duration of stay was 1 day (interquartile range: 1–3 days). The short-term mortality rate of oncology patients in PICU was 13.3% in comparison with 16.2% in the overall PICU population. The 4-year overall survival rate post PICU discharge was 54%.<br /><strong>Conclusion:</strong> The documented short-term mortality rate indicates that referrals by paediatric oncologists are consistent with current PICU admission policies. Oncologists should assess the prognosis for survival before requesting admission to PICU, and, resources permitting, these patients should be accepted to PICU.

Critically ill patients with cancer: chances and limitations of intensive care medicine-a narrative review

This narrative review deals with the challenge of defining adequate therapy goals and intensive care unit (ICU) admission criteria for critically ill patients with cancer. Several specific complications of critically ill patients with cancer require close collaborations of intensive care and cancer specialists. Intensivists require a basic understanding of the pathophysiology, diagnosis and therapy of common cancer-specific problems. Cancer specialists must be knowledgeable in preventing, detecting and treating imminent or manifest organ failures. In case of one or more organ dysfunctions, ICU admissions must be evaluated early. In order to properly define the therapy goals for critically ill patients with cancer, decision-makers must be aware of the short-term intensive care prognosis as well as the long-term oncological options and perspectives. Multidisciplinary teamwork is key when it comes down to decisions on ICU admission, planning of therapeutic aims, patient management in the ICU and tailored therapy limiting with smooth transition into a palliative care (PC) setting, whenever appropriate.

Complications of tracheal intubation in critically ill pediatric cancer patients

Background and Aims:

The oncologists are treating cancer more aggressively, leading to increase in number of pediatric admissions to the ICU. Due to anatomical and physiological differences, pediatric patients are at high risk of complications during intubation. We evaluated the incidence of complications during intubations in pediatric patients in our ICU.

Subjects and Methods:

We performed retrospective analysis of complications occurring during intubation in 42 pediatric patients. All intubations were orotracheal. We recorded number of attempts at intubation, need for use of intubation adjuncts and complications during laryngoscopy and intubation. The incidence of difficult intubation, hypoxia, and severe cardiovascular collapse was also noted.

Results:

Complications occurred during 13 (31%) intubations. Hypoxia and severe cardiovascular collapse occurred in during 7 (16.7%) intubations each, while 4 patients (9.5%) (n=4) had cardiac arrest during intubation. Thirty three (78.6%) intubations were successful in first attempt and difficult intubation was recorded in 4 patients.

Conclusion:

Critically ill pediatric cancer patients have a high rate of complications during intubation.

A Prospective Evaluation of Symptom Prevalence and Overall Symptom Burden Among Cohort of Critically Ill Cancer Patients

Background:

Gross physiological perturbations necessitating the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admission might exacerbate the already existing or initiate bothersome symptoms among cancer patients. There is a lack of conclusive evidence concerning the symptomatic experience among this subgroup of cancer patients particularly so in the Indian population. The aim of this prospective observational study was to elucidate the symptom prevalence and overall symptomatic distress among critically ill cancer patients at the time of admission to a medical ICU.

Methods:

We prospectively evaluated 110 consecutive cancer patients at the time of admission to our medical ICU for the presence and intensity of symptoms using a modified Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS). The patients/caregivers were also enquired regarding the most bothersome symptom in the past 1 week and the presence of “symptom associated sleep disturbance.” The primary outcome was the prevalence of patients with moderate (ESAS ≥ 40) and severe (ESAS ≥ 70) symptomatic distress.

Results:

The average age was 52.49 years with 75.45% of the respondents in the economically productive age group (21–60 years). Carcinoma breast (19.35%) and lung (14.58%) were the most common cancers among females and males, respectively. 87.27% and 60% of the patients had advanced cancer and multi-organ dysfunction, respectively. About 76.36% patients were able to complete ESAS either by themselves or with caregiver's assistance within first 24 h of ICU admission. The mean ESAS distress score was 48.04 (0–81) with 72.72% of the patients having moderate-severe symptomatic distress. Loss of appetite (92.73%) and nausea (54.55%) were the most common and the least common reported symptoms, respectively. Pain was the most common and “most distressing symptom” reported by 40% of patients with 64.55% patients reporting one or more symptoms severe enough to interfere with their sleep.

Conclusion:

ESAS is a user-friendly cognitive aid to make the healthcare team cognizant of the symptom existence and overall symptomatic burden among cancer patients with gross physiological perturbations. The high prevalence of moderate-severe symptom distress requires the concomitant provision of palliative and intensive care among this group of cancer patients.

Intensive care for cancer patients: An interdisciplinary challenge for cancer specialists and intensive care physicians

Every sixth to eighth European intensive care unit patient suffers from an underlying malignant disease. A large proportion of these patients present with cancer-related complications. This review explains why the prognosis of critically ill cancer patients has improved substantially over the last decades and which risk factors are of prognostic importance. Furthermore, the main reasons for intensive care unit admission – acute respiratory failure and septic complications – are discussed with regard to diagnostic and therapeutic specifics. In addition, we discuss potential intensive care unit admission criteria with respect to cancer prognosis. The successful management of critically ill cancer patients requires a close collaboration of intensivists with hematologists, oncologists and colleagues from other disciplines, such as infectious disease specialists, microbiologists, radiologists, surgeons, pharmacists, and others.

Intensive care unit prognostic factors in critically ill patients with advanced solid tumors: a 3-year retrospective study

Background

The objective of this study was to identify risk factors predicting prognosis of critically ill medical patients with advanced solid tumors in the intensive care unit (ICU).

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed all ICU unplanned medical admissions to the ICU of patients with advanced solid cancer in Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital between October 1, 2012 and March 1, 2015. Approval was obtained from the Ethical Commission of Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital to review and publish information from patients’ records.

Results

One hundred and forty-one patients with full code status met the criteria for inclusion from among 813 ICU admissions. ICU mortality was 14.9 % and in-hospital mortality was 29.8 %. The major reasons for unplanned ICU admission were respiratory failure (38.3 %) and severe sepsis or septic shock (27.7 %). The ICU mortality in patients who required vasopressors, mechanical ventilation or renal replacement therapy for >24 h was 25, 25.9 and 40 %, respectively. The mean overall survival was 28.6 months. After adjusting for hypertension, type of solid cancer, intervention time, need for mechanical ventilation and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score, only Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score on day 7 of ICU treatment remained a significant predictor of ICU mortality (adjusted odds ratio 1.612, 95 % confidence interval 1.137–2.285, P = 0.007).

Conclusions

We suggest broadening the criteria for ICU admission. The patients should be allowed an ICU trial consisting of unlimited ICU support, including invasive hemodynamic monitoring, mechanical ventilation and renal replacement therapy. An interdisciplinary meeting, including an ethics consultation, should be held to make end-of-life decisions if the SOFA score on day 7 shows clinical deterioration with no available therapeutic options.

Early Palliative Care-Health services research and implementation of sustainable changes: the study protocol of the EVI project

Background

International medical organizations such as the American Society of Medical Oncology recommend early palliative care as the “gold standard” for palliative care in patients with advanced cancer. Nevertheless, even in Comprehensive Cancer Centers, early palliative care is not yet routine practice. The main goal of the EVI project is to evaluate whether early palliative care can be implemented—in the sense of “putting evidence into practice”—into the everyday clinical practice of Comprehensive Cancer Centers. In addition, we are interested in (1) describing the type of support that patients would like from palliative care, (2) gaining information about the effect of palliative care on patients’ quality of life, and (3) understanding the economic burden of palliative care on patients and their families.

Methods/design

The EVI project is a multi-center, prospective cohort study with a sequential control group design. The study is a project of the Palliative Care Center of Excellence (KOMPACT) in Baden-Württemberg, Germany, which was recently established to combine the expertise of five academic, specialist palliative care departments. The study is divided into two phases: preliminary phase (months 1–9) and main study phase (months 10–18). In each of all five participating academic Comprehensive Cancer Centers, an experienced palliative care physician will be hired for 18 months. During the preliminary phase, the physician will be allowed time to establish the necessary structures for early palliative care within the Comprehensive Cancer Center. In the main study phase, patients with metastatic cancer will be offered a consultation with the palliative care physician within eight weeks of diagnosis. After the initial consultation, follow-up consultations will be offered as needed. The study is built upon a convergent parallel design. In the quantitative arm, patients will be surveyed in both the preliminary and main study phase at three points in time (baseline, 12 weeks, 24 weeks). Standardized questionnaires will be used to measure patients’ quality of life, symptom burden and mood. Using interviews with palliative care physicians, oncologists, department heads, patients and their caregivers, the qualitative arm will explore (1) what factors encourage and hinder the early integration of palliative care into standard oncology care, (2) what support patients and their caregivers would like from palliative care, and (3) what effect palliative care has on the economic disease burden of patients and their families.

Discussion

The study proposed is meant to serve as a catalyzer. Local palliative care teams should be put in position to routinely cooperate with the primary treating department at their respective cancer center. The long-term goal of this project is to create sustainable improvements in the care of patients with incurable cancer.

Trial registration

DRKS00006162; date of registration: 19/05/2014

[The palliative patient as an emergency patient: A model for decision making in life-threatening situations using 4 case reports]

BACKGROUND

Increasingly more patients reaching our hospitals as an emergency are chronically ill or are in advanced stages of infaust, e.g., malignant, diseases. On the other hand, the treatment options for malignant diseases are improving. In an emergency, a decision must be made between life-sustaining treatment (in the context of a potentially poor prognosis) versus palliation.

DEVELOPMENT OF A DECISION-MAKING MODEL

The current literature about this topic is heterogeneous. The aim of the present article is to present a method using four case reports to decide either for life-sustaining treatment or for palliation with the help of the following: (1) the prognosis of the chronic disease and (2) the association of the acute situation with the chronic disease.

CONCLUSION

This method has an advisory role and cannot be taken as a guideline. Its usefulness can only be proven in practice.

Prognostic factors, long-term survival, and outcome of cancer patients receiving chemotherapy in the intensive care unit

Prognostic factors and outcomes of cancer patients with acute organ failure receiving chemotherapy (CT) in the intensive care unit (ICU) are still incompletely described. We therefore retrospectively studied all patients who received CT in any ICU of our institution between October 2006 and November 2013. Fifty-six patients with hematologic (n = 49; 87.5 %) or solid (n = 7; 12.5 %) malignancies, of which 20 (36 %) were diagnosed in the ICU, were analyzed [m/f ratio, 33:23; median age, 47 years (IQR 32 to 62); Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), 3 (2 to 5); Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (SAPS II), 50 (39 to 61)]. The main reasons for admission were acute respiratory failure, acute kidney failure, and septic shock. Mechanical ventilation and vasopressors were employed in 34 patients (61 %) respectively, hemofiltration in 22 (39 %), and extracorporeal life support in 7 (13 %). Twenty-seven patients (48 %) received their first CT in the ICU. Intention of therapy was cure in 46 patients (82 %). Tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) developed in 20 patients (36 %). ICU and hospital survival was 75 and 59 %. Hospital survivors were significantly younger; had lower CCI, SAPS II, and TLS risk scores; presented less often with septic shock; were less likely to develop TLS; and received vasopressors, hemofiltration, and thrombocyte transfusions in lower proportions. After discharge, 88 % continued CT and 69 % of 1-year survivors were in complete remission. Probability of 1- and 2-year survival was 41 and 38 %, respectively. Conclusively, administration of CT in selected ICU cancer patients was feasible and associated with considerable long-term survival as well as long-term disease-free survival.

[Neutropenia and sepsis]

The clinical management of neutropenic infections represents a great diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. Established sepsis criteria only partially reflect the neutropenic setting. Diagnostic procedures are frequently impaired by thrombocytopenia and progressive respiratory insufficiency. Increased tendency to bleed, engraftment, and fulminant progression represent major therapeutic challenges. Thus, crucial for the diagnosis and therapy of neutropenic sepsis are clear and well-communicated algorithms, rapid action, and close collaboration between oncologists and intensivists.

Adverse drug events resulting in admission to the intensive care unit in oncology patients: Incidence, characteristics and associated cost

Purpose:

Describe the incidence, characteristics and cost of adverse drug events that necessitate admission to the intensive care unit in oncology patients.

Methods:

This was a prospective observational 5-months study at a medical/surgical intensive care unit of a comprehensive teaching cancer center. Patients admitted to the intensive care unit were screened to determine whether the admission was due to an adverse drug event. The adverse drug events were characterized based on the suspected medication, system involved and preventability. Patient demographics, length of stay, mortality and the total patient charges during their intensive care unit stay were recorded.

Results:

During the study period, 249 patients were screened and an adverse drug event was the primary cause of 57 (22.9%) admissions. The most common medications associated with an adverse drug event requiring intensive care unit admission were antineoplastics ( n = 37), analgesics ( n = 9) and anticoagulants ( n = 4). Ten adverse drug events were considered preventable. The average length of stay for patients with adverse drug events resulting in intensive care unit admission was 6.2 days ±9.8 (SD) and the mortality rate was 28.1%. Hematological malignancy was independently associated with adverse drug events resulting in intensive care unit admission. The average patient charges for the intensive care unit stay was US$11,692 ± 17,529 (SD), which corresponded to about US$1.5 million in annual patient charges for a 12-bed intensive care unit at a cancer institution.

Conclusions:

Adverse drug events resulting in intensive care unit admission in oncology patients are common and often associated with significant morbidity, mortality, and cost.

[Intensive medical care problems of hemato-oncological patients]

Die Lebenserwartung und Prävalenz von Krebserkrankungen steigt stetig an, was unweigerlich zu einer Zunahme an kritisch erkrankten Krebspatienten führt. Dieser Beitrag erläutert, warum es in den letzten Jahrzehnten zu einer deutlichen Verbesserung der Prognose von intensivmedizinisch behandelten Krebspatienten kam, welche Gründe am häufigsten zur Aufnahme führen und welche Risikofaktoren sich auf die Mortalität auswirken. Ferner wird die Wichtigkeit einer adäquaten Patientenselektion besprochen sowie auf weitere Spezifika eingegangen. So bringt z. B. das akute respiratorische Versagen als weitaus häufigste Organdysfunktion in dieser Patientengruppe sowohl prognostisch, diagnostisch als auch therapeutisch etliche wichtige Besonderheiten mit sich. Die erfolgreiche Versorgung von Krebspatienten auf einer Intensivstation (ICU) setzt ein spezifisches Wissen der Intensivmediziner und eine gute Zusammenarbeit mit den behandelnden Hämatologen und Onkologen voraus.