Ovarian cancer survival population differences: a "high resolution study" comparing Philippine residents, and Filipino-Americans and Caucasians living in the US

Clear differences in ovarian cancer incidence and trends by ethnicity among Asian Americans

BACKGROUND

Across major races in the United States (U.S.), ovarian cancer incidence is low among Asian American women. However, this observation aggregates Asian Americans as a single group despite their heterogeneity. Disaggregating the ethnic Asian population will produce more useful information to better understand ovarian cancer incidence among Asian women in the U.S.

METHODS

Data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program from 1990 to 2014 were used to compare age-adjusted incidence rates (AAIRs, per 100,000 women) for ovarian cancer for the six largest U.S. Asian ethnicities (Asian Indian/Pakistani, Chinese, Filipino, Japanese, Korean, Vietnamese) to non-Hispanic whites (NHWs). The race/ethnicity-specific AAIRs were calculated by time period and histotype. We examined the magnitude and direction of AAIR trends using average annual percent change (AAPC) statistics.

RESULTS

All Asian ethnicities had significantly lower ovarian cancer incidence rates than NHWs. However, among Asian ethnicities, Asian Indians/Pakistanis had the highest rate of ovarian cancer (AAIR = 10.51, 95% CI: 9.65-11.42) while Koreans had the lowest (AAIR = 7.23, 95% CI: 6.62-7.88). Clear cell ovarian cancer had significantly higher incidence rates among Chinese, Filipino, and Japanese women than NHW women (incidence rate ratio (IRR) = 1.49, 95% CI: 1.29-1.72, IRR = 1.30, 95% CI: 1.12-1.51, IRR = 1.64, 95% CI: 1.36-1.97, respectively). Incidence trends also differed by Asian ethnicity with significant decreases only observed for Chinese (AAPC = -1.49, 95% CI: -2.22 to -0.74) and Japanese (AAPC = -1.75, 95% CI: -2.57 to -0.92).

CONCLUSIONS

Examining Asian Americans as a single group results in missed ethnic-specific disparities in ovarian cancer, hence disaggregating this heterogeneous population in future research is warranted.

Relatively Poor Survival of Mucinous Ovarian Carcinoma in Advanced Stage: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Overall, patients with mucinous ovarian carcinoma (MOC) are considered to have a better prognosis compared with the whole group of nonmucinous carcinomas. However, some studies indicate that patients with advanced-stage MOC might have a worse prognosis than those with advanced-stage serous ovarian carcinoma (SOC). We carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis of the current literature.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was carried out identifying 19 articles that compare survival of patients with MOC and patients with SOC. Meta-analyses were performed for risk ratio (RR) and hazard ratio (HR) for all International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stages together, as well as for early- and advanced-stage diseases separately.

RESULTS

Overall, patients with MOC showed a lower risk of dying within 5 years (RR, 0.67; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.64-0.69; n = 45 333) and a longer survival (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.58-0.75; HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.78-0.98, for univariate and multivariate analyses, respectively; n = 5540) compared with those with SOC. In contrast, in advanced-stage (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stages III and IV) disease, patients with MOC have a higher risk of dying within 5 years (RR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.13-1.17; n = 36 113) and a shorter survival (HR, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.71-1.94; n = 19 907).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with advanced-stage MOC have a significantly worse prognosis compared with patients with SOC, whereas in early stage, the prognosis of patients with MOC is better.

Global distribution pattern of histological subtypes of epithelial ovarian cancer: a database analysis and systematic review

BACKGROUND

Epithelial ovarian cancer is basically a heterogeneous disease with different chemosensitivity and distinct molecular alternations for each histological subtype. In order to assess whether the results of clinical trials can be extrapolated to a new country, it is critical to first examine whether the relative frequencies is homogenous across countries.

METHODS

Cancer registry database from a single institution in Taiwan combined with systematic review of the global literature on the relative frequencies of histological subtypes between 2003 and 2012 was provided.

RESULTS

Of 175 titles identified, 41 studies met inclusion/exclusion criteria. Globally, for each subtype, the median value of relative frequencies for serous subtype was 45.0%, with the Philippines (16.0%), Indonesia (22.7%), and Brazil (30.1%) as the three lowest countries and South Africa (68.0%), Greece (71.5%), and India (86.7%) as the three highest countries; for mucinous subtype, 11.4%, Italy (3.0%), Australia (3.4%), and Japan (5.4%) were the three lowest countries, while Indonesia (29.1%), Singapore (30.3%), and South Korea (38.6%) were the three highest countries; for endometrioid subtype, 12.6%, India (1.6%), Greece (5.7%), and Portugal (7.6%) were the three lowest countries, while Taiwan (24.8%), Egypt (25.0%), and Austria (25.5%) were the three highest countries; and for clear cell subtype, 5.3%, Pakistan (1.0%), Iran (2.0%), and Brazil (2.1%) were the three lowest countries while Thailand (16.0%), Taiwan (16.8%), and Spain (18.8%) were the three highest countries.

CONCLUSIONS

Relative frequencies of subtypes were not homogenous across countries. This diversity may reflect the geographical and ethnic variations. Globally, epithelial ovarian cancer is a heterogeneous disease with a heterogeneous distribution pattern.

Study populations for period analyses of cancer survival

Background:

Period analysis is increasingly used to compute long-term cancer survival, as it provides better prediction of survival of newly diagnosed patients than traditional cohort analysis. However, the patient population to which period survival estimates best pertain to and which should be described in a study is less obvious.

Methods:

Using Finnish Cancer Registry data on 23 common cancer sites, age-standardized period estimates of 5-, 10-, 15-, and 20-year relative survival were computed for each 2-, 5-, and 10-year calendar period in 1954–2003 and compared with survival estimates for two cohorts by means of mean, mean absolute and mean squared differences: a full cohort of all patients potentially contributing some data to the survival analysis and a restricted cohort of patients diagnosed in the period of interest.

Results:

In most computations, survival estimates for the full cohorts were on average closer to the period estimates for the majority of cancer sites. For 10-year survival, results were less obvious with respect to the mean difference. However, mean squared and mean absolute differences were smaller for the majority of cancers when using the full cohort.

Conclusion:

Our results suggest that the full cohort should be described in reports of period survival analysis.

Two-in-one: combined targeted chemo and gene therapy for tumor suppression and prevention of metastases

Aims: To develop an approach for the effective treatment of ovarian tumor, prevention of metastases and limitation of side effects. Materials & Methods: In order to combine chemotherapy with genotherapy, we constructed a nanoscale-based tumor-targeted system containing two anticancer drugs, two antisense oligonucleotides (suppressors of cellular resistance) and a ligand specific to receptors overexpressed in cancer cells. The system was tested in a mouse metastatic xenograft model using tumor isolates from patients with ovarian carcinoma. Results: Treatment with the proposed nanosystem decreased primary tumor, prevented intraperitoneal metastases and limited adverse side effects. Conclusions: The advantages of the proposed targeted complex treatment of primary aggressive ovarian tumor and prevention of metastases make the proposed approach promising for clinical applications.