1
|
Baxter H, Bearne L, Stone T, Thomas C, Denholm R, Redwood S, Purdy S, Huntley AL. The effectiveness of knowledge-sharing techniques and approaches in research funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR): a systematic review. Health Res Policy Syst 2024; 22:41. [PMID: 38566127 PMCID: PMC10988883 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-024-01127-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2023] [Accepted: 03/05/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The National Institute of Health and Care Research (NIHR), funds, enables and delivers world-leading health and social care research to improve people's health and wellbeing. To achieve this aim, effective knowledge sharing (two-way knowledge sharing between researchers and stakeholders to create new knowledge and enable change in policy and practice) is needed. To date, it is not known which knowledge sharing techniques and approaches are used or how effective these are in creating new knowledge that can lead to changes in policy and practice in NIHR funded studies. METHODS In this restricted systematic review, electronic databases [MEDLINE, The Health Management Information Consortium (including the Department of Health's Library and Information Services and King's Fund Information and Library Services)] were searched for published NIHR funded studies that described knowledge sharing between researchers and other stakeholders. One researcher performed title and abstract, full paper screening and quality assessment (Critical Appraisal Skills Programme qualitative checklist) with a 20% sample independently screened by a second reviewer. A narrative synthesis was adopted. RESULTS In total 9897 records were identified. After screening, 17 studies were included. Five explicit forms of knowledge sharing studies were identified: embedded models, knowledge brokering, stakeholder engagement and involvement of non-researchers in the research or service design process and organisational collaborative partnerships between universities and healthcare organisations. Collectively, the techniques and approaches included five types of stakeholders and worked with them at all stages of the research cycle, except the stage of formation of the research design and preparation of funding application. Seven studies (using four of the approaches) gave examples of new knowledge creation, but only one study (using an embedded model approach) gave an example of a resulting change in practice. The use of a theory, model or framework to explain the knowledge sharing process was identified in six studies. CONCLUSIONS Five knowledge sharing techniques and approaches were reported in the included NIHR funded studies, and seven studies identified the creation of new knowledge. However, there was little investigation of the effectiveness of these approaches in influencing change in practice or policy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helen Baxter
- Evidence and Dissemination, National Institute for Health and Care Research, Twickenham, United Kingdom.
- National Institute for Health and Care Research, Applied Research Collaboration West (NIHR ARC WEST), University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom.
| | - Lindsay Bearne
- Evidence and Dissemination, National Institute for Health and Care Research, Twickenham, United Kingdom
- Population Health Research Institute, St George's, University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Tracey Stone
- National Institute for Health and Care Research, Applied Research Collaboration West (NIHR ARC WEST), University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Clare Thomas
- National Institute for Health and Care Research, Applied Research Collaboration West (NIHR ARC WEST), University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom
- National Institute for Health and Care Research, Health Protection Research Unit in Behaviour Science and Evaluation (NIHR HPRU BSE), University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Rachel Denholm
- National Institute for Health and Care Research, Bristol Biomedical Research Centre (NIHR BRC), University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Sabi Redwood
- National Institute for Health and Care Research, Applied Research Collaboration West (NIHR ARC WEST), University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Sarah Purdy
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Alyson Louise Huntley
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Macassa G, McGrath C. Common Problems! and Common Solutions? - Teaching at the Intersection Between Public Health and Criminology: A Public Health Perspective. Ann Glob Health 2024; 90:12. [PMID: 38370862 PMCID: PMC10870948 DOI: 10.5334/aogh.4375] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2023] [Accepted: 01/20/2024] [Indexed: 02/20/2024] Open
Abstract
Public health and criminology share similar current and future challenges, mostly related to crime and health causation, prevention, and sustainable development. Interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary approaches to education at the intersection of public health and criminology can be an integral part of future training in areas of mutual interest. Based on reflections on teaching criminology students, this viewpoint discusses the main interconnections between public health and criminology teaching through the public health lens. The paper discusses potential challenges associated with interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity. Among these challenges is communication across the different fields and their perspectives to be able to achieve the desired complementarity at the intersection of the two disciplines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gloria Macassa
- Department of Public Health and Sports Science, Faculty of Occupational and Health Sciences, University of Gävle, Kungsbacksvägen 47, 80176 Gävle, Sweden
- Department of Public Health, School of Health Sciences, University of Skövde, 541 28 Skövde, Sweden
| | - Cormac McGrath
- EPIUnit–Instituto de Saude Publica, Universidade do Porto, Rua das Taipas 135, 4050–600 Porto, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Elliott J, Stolee P, Mairs K, Kothari A, Conklin J. A Community of Practice on Environmental Design for Long-Term Care Residents with Dementia. Can J Aging 2023; 42:404-415. [PMID: 36799024 DOI: 10.1017/s0714980823000028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/18/2023] Open
Abstract
The use of communities of practice (CoP) to support the application of knowledge in improved geriatric care practice is not widely understood. This case study's aim was to gain a deeper understanding of the knowledge-to-action (KTA) processes of a CoP focused on environmental design, to improve how persons with dementia find their way around in long-term care (LTC) homes. Qualitative data were collected (key informant interviews, observations, and document review), and analysed using emergent coding. CoP members contributed extensive knowledge to the KTA process characterized by the following themes: team dynamics, employing a structured process, technology use, varied forms of knowledge, and a clear initiative. The study's CoP effectively synthesized and translated knowledge into practical tools to inform changes in practice, programs, and policy on dementia care. More research is needed on how to involve patients and caregivers in the KTA processes, and to ensure that practical application of knowledge has financial and policy support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacobi Elliott
- School of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada
- Lawson Health Research Institute, London, Canada
- School of Health Studies, Western University, London, Canada
| | - Paul Stolee
- School of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada
| | - Katie Mairs
- School of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada
| | - Anita Kothari
- School of Health Studies, Western University, London, Canada
| | - James Conklin
- Department of Applied Human Sciences, Concordia University, Montreal, Canada
- Bruyère Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Weber M, Armour VL, Lindstadt C, Yanovitzky I. Testing Multiple Methods to Effectively Promote Use of a Knowledge Portal to Health Policy Makers: Quasi-Experimental Evaluation. J Med Internet Res 2023; 25:e41997. [PMID: 37379073 PMCID: PMC10365604 DOI: 10.2196/41997] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2022] [Revised: 03/16/2023] [Accepted: 04/28/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Health policy makers and advocates increasingly utilize online resources for policy-relevant knowledge. Knowledge brokering is one potential mechanism to encourage the use of research evidence in policy making, but the mechanisms of knowledge brokerage in online spaces are understudied. This work looks at knowledge brokerage through the launch of Project ASPEN, an online knowledge portal developed in response to a New Jersey legislative act that established a pilot program for adolescent depression screening for young adults in grades 7-12. OBJECTIVE This study compares the ability to drive policy brief downloads by policy makers and advocates from the Project ASPEN knowledge portal using a variety of online methods to promote the knowledge portal. METHODS The knowledge portal was launched on February 1, 2022, and a Google Ad campaign was run between February 27, 2022, and March 26, 2022. Subsequently, a targeted social media campaign, an email campaign, and tailored research presentations were used to promote the website. Promotional activities ended on May 31, 2022. Website analytics were used to track a variety of actions including new users coming to the website, page views, and policy brief downloads. Statistical analysis was used to assess the efficacy of different approaches. RESULTS The campaign generated 2837 unique user visits to the knowledge portal and 4713 page views. In addition, the campaign generated 6.5 policy web page views/day and 0.7 policy brief downloads/day compared with 1.8 views/day and 0.5 downloads/day in the month following the campaign. The rate of policy brief page view conversions was significantly higher for Google Ads compared with other channels such as email (16.0 vs 5.4; P<.001) and tailored research presentations (16.0 vs 0.8; P<.001). The download conversion rate for Google Ads was significantly higher compared with social media (1.2 vs 0.1; P<.001) and knowledge brokering activities (1.2 vs 0.2; P<.001). By contrast, the download conversion rate for the email campaign was significantly higher than that for social media (1.0 vs 0.1; P<.001) and tailored research presentations (1.0 vs 0.2; P<.001). While Google Ads for this campaign cost an average of US $2.09 per click, the cost per conversion was US $11 per conversion to drive targeted policy web page views and US $147 per conversion to drive policy brief downloads. While other approaches drove less traffic, those approaches were more targeted and cost-effective. CONCLUSIONS Four tactics were tested to drive user engagement with policy briefs on the Project ASPEN knowledge portal. Google Ads was shown to be effective in driving a high volume of policy web page views but was ineffective in terms of relative costs. More targeted approaches such as email campaigns and tailored research presentations given to policy makers and advocates to promote the use of research evidence on the knowledge portal website are likely to be more effective when balancing goals and cost-effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew Weber
- Department of Communication, School of Communication and Information, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, United States
| | - Veronica L Armour
- Department of Communication, School of Communication and Information, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, United States
| | - Calandra Lindstadt
- Office of Engagement and Extension, Colorado State University, Grand Junction, CO, United States
| | - Itzhak Yanovitzky
- Department of Communication, School of Communication and Information, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, United States
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Gaid D, Ahmed S, Thomas A, Bussières A. Barriers and Facilitators to Knowledge Brokering Activities: Perspectives from Knowledge Brokers Working in Canadian Rehabilitation Settings. THE JOURNAL OF CONTINUING EDUCATION IN THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS 2023; 43:87-95. [PMID: 36859412 DOI: 10.1097/ceh.0000000000000475] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2021] [Accepted: 09/29/2022] [Indexed: 05/31/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Knowledge translation experts advocate for employing knowledge brokers (KBs) to promote the uptake of research evidence in health care settings. Yet, no previous research has identified potential barriers for KBs to promote the uptake of research evidence in rehabilitation settings. This study aimed to identify the barriers and facilitators for KBs in Canadian rehabilitation settings as perceived by individuals serving as KBs. METHODS Qualitative study using semistructured telephone interviews with individuals performing KB activities in rehabilitation settings across Canada. The interview topic guide was informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) and consisted of 20 questions covering three domains (characteristics of individuals, inner setting, and outer settings). We conducted qualitative descriptive analysis combining deductive coding guided by the CFIR. RESULTS Characteristics of individuals included having communication skills, clinical experience, research skills, and interpersonal features, in addition to being confident and motivated and receiving training. The inner setting domain included having constant networking with stakeholders and being aware of stakeholders' needs, in addition to resources availability, leadership engagement, knowledge accessibility, prioritizing brokering activities, and monitoring KBs' performance. Finally, the outer setting domain showed that KBs need to be connected to a community of practice to promote information exchange and avoid work duplications. DISCUSSION Factors likely to hinder or promote the optimal use of KBs within Canadian rehabilitation settings include skill sets and networking abilities; organizational culture, resources, and leadership engagement; and the need for specific training for KBs and for evaluation tools to monitor their performance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dina Gaid
- Dr. Gaid: McGill University, School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, and The Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montreal (CRIR), Montreal, Quebec, Canada. Dr. Ahmed: McGill University, School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, and The Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montreal (CRIR), Montreal, Quebec, Canada, and Research Institute McGill University Health Center, Centre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (CORE), Montreal, Quebec, Canada. Dr. Thomas: McGill University, School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, and The Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montreal (CRIR), Montreal, Quebec, Canada, and Institute of Health Sciences Education, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. Dr. Bussières: Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, Quebec, Canada, and McGill University, School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, and The Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montreal (CRIR), Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Mickan S, Wenke R, Weir K, Bialocerkowski A, Noble C. Using knowledge brokering activities to promote allied health clinicians' engagement in research: a qualitative exploration. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e060456. [PMID: 35487731 PMCID: PMC9058767 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060456] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Engaging clinicians in research can improve healthcare organisational performance, patient and staff satisfaction. Emerging evidence suggests that knowledge brokering activities potentially support clinicians' research engagement, but it is unclear how best they should be used. OBJECTIVES This study explores how embedded researchers utilised knowledge brokering activities to engage research interested clinicians in research. DESIGN A longitudinal qualitative interview based study was co-designed to investigate how experienced research fellows utilise knowledge brokering activities to facilitate allied health clinicians' engagement in research. SETTING In one large tertiary level, regional Australian health service, research fellows were matched with research interested clinicians. METHODS Qualitative analysis of three longitudinal semi-structured interviews for each research fellow was undertaken. Initial descriptions of their utilisation of knowledge brokering activities were deductively coded. Reflexive thematic analysis was utilised to generate a shared explanation of clinicians' engagement in research. RESULTS Three research fellows facilitated 21 clinicians' participation in and leadership of clinical research projects over 12 months. They utilised all ten key knowledge brokering activities with each clinician, with differing patterns and examples. Research fellows described using linkage and exchange activities of communicating and collaborating with key stakeholders, and they tailored knowledge management products for individual's engagement. Further, they described a broader learning journey where they clarified and monitored individuals' capabilities, motivation and their contextual support for research engagement. CONCLUSION When research fellows chose and tailored knowledge brokering activities to align and extend clinicians' research capabilities and motivation, they created individualised learning curriculums to support clinicians' participation in and leadership of local research projects. Health and academic leaders should consider structuring embedded researcher positions to include knowledge brokering roles and activities, specifically for research interested clinicians who are ready to participate in and lead research projects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Mickan
- Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Bond University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
| | - Rachel Wenke
- Allied Health, Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service, Southport, Queensland, Australia
| | - Kelly Weir
- Allied Health, Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service, Southport, Queensland, Australia
- Griffith Health, Griffith University - Gold Coast Campus, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
| | - Andrea Bialocerkowski
- Griffith Health, Griffith University - Gold Coast Campus, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
| | - Christy Noble
- Office of Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Gaid D, Ahmed S, Thomas A, Bussières A. Profiling knowledge brokers in the rehabilitation sector across Canada: A descriptive study. J Eval Clin Pract 2022; 28:303-314. [PMID: 34611962 DOI: 10.1111/jep.13621] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2021] [Accepted: 09/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
RATIONALE Knowledge brokers (KBs) can help promote the uptake of the latest research evidence into clinical practice. Little is known about who they are, the types of roles they perform, and the training they receive. Establishing a portrait of Canadian KBs working in the rehabilitation sector may inform health care organizations and knowledge translation specialists on how best to advance KBs practices. The overall goal was to describe the profile of KBs working to promote the uptake of evidence within rehabilitation settings in Canada. Specifically, this study aimed to describe the sociodemographic and professional characteristics, work activities, and training of KBs. METHODS A cross-sectional online survey was administered to KBs working in rehabilitation settings across Canada. The survey included 20 questions covering sociodemographic and professional characteristics, work activities, and training opportunities. Response frequency and percentage were calculated for all categorical variables, and the weighted average (WA) for each role was calculated across participants. Descriptive analysis was conducted for all open-ended questions. RESULTS Of 475 participants accessing the website, 198 completed the survey questionnaire, including 99 clinicians, 35 researchers, and 26 managers. While over two-thirds of respondents had completed a graduate degree, only 38% reported receiving KBs-related training. The respondents' primary roles corresponded to a linking agent (WA = 1.84), followed by capacity builder (WA = 1.76), information manager (WA = 1.71), facilitator (WA = 1.41), and evaluator (WA = 1.32). CONCLUSIONS KBs are mostly expert clinicians who tend to perform brokering activities part-time targeting their peers. Participants mostly perform the linking agent, capacity builder, and information roles. Moreover, only a few participants received formal training to perform brokering activities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dina Gaid
- McGill University, School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, The Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montréal (CRIR), Montreal, Québec, Canada
| | - Sara Ahmed
- McGill University, School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, The Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montréal (CRIR), Montreal, Québec, Canada
| | - Aliki Thomas
- McGill University, School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, The Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montréal (CRIR), Montreal, Québec, Canada
| | - André Bussières
- McGill University, School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, The Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montréal (CRIR), Montreal, Québec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Boutcher F, Berta W, Urquhart R, Gagliardi AR. The roles, activities and impacts of middle managers who function as knowledge brokers to improve care delivery and outcomes in healthcare organizations: a critical interpretive synthesis. BMC Health Serv Res 2022; 22:11. [PMID: 34974827 PMCID: PMC8722036 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-07387-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2021] [Accepted: 12/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Middle Managers (MMs) are thought to play a pivotal role as knowledge brokers (KBs) in healthcare organizations. However, the role of MMs who function as KBs (MM KBs) in health care is under-studied. Research is needed that contributes to our understanding of how MMs broker knowledge in health care and what factors influence their KB efforts. Methods We used a critical interpretive synthesis (CIS) approach to review both qualitative and quantitative studies to develop an organizing framework of how MMs enact the KB role in health care. We used compass questions to create a search strategy and electronic searches were conducted in MEDLINE, CINAHL, Social Sciences Abstracts, ABI/INFORM, EMBASE, PubMed, PsycINFO, ERIC and the Cochrane Library. Searching, sampling, and data analysis was an iterative process, using constant comparison, to synthesize the results. Results We included 41 articles (38 empirical studies and 3 conceptual papers) that met the eligibility criteria. No existing review was found on this topic. A synthesis of the studies revealed 12 MM KB roles and 63 associated activities beyond existing roles hypothesized by extant theory, and we elaborate on two MM KB roles: 1) convincing others of the need for, and benefit of an innovation or evidence-based practice; and 2) functioning as a strategic influencer. We identified organizational and individual factors that may influence the efforts of MM KBs in healthcare organizations. Additionally, we found that the MM KB role was associated with enhanced provider knowledge, and skills, as well as improved organizational outcomes. Conclusion Our findings suggest that MMs do enact KB roles in healthcare settings to implement innovations and practice change. Our organizing framework offers a novel conceptualization of MM KBs that advances understanding of the emerging KB role that MMs play in healthcare organizations. In addition to roles, this study contributes to the extant literature by revealing factors that may influence the efforts and impacts of MM KBs in healthcare organizations. Future studies are required to refine and strengthen this framework. Trial registration A protocol for this review was not registered. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-021-07387-z.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Faith Boutcher
- Baycrest Health Sciences, 3560 Bathurst Street, Toronto, Ontario, M6A 2E1, Canada.
| | - Whitney Berta
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Health Sciences Building Suite 425, 155 College Street, Toronto, Ontario, M5T 3M6, Canada
| | - Robin Urquhart
- Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, Dalhousie University, Room 413, 5790 University Avenue, Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 1V7, Canada
| | - Anna R Gagliardi
- University Health Network, 13EN-228, 200 Elizabeth Street, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2C4, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Gaid D, Mate K, Ahmed S, Thomas A, Bussières A. Nationwide Environmental Scan of Knowledge Brokers Training. THE JOURNAL OF CONTINUING EDUCATION IN THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS 2022; 42:e3-e11. [PMID: 33929357 PMCID: PMC8876370 DOI: 10.1097/ceh.0000000000000355] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Knowledge brokers (KBs) can promote the uptake of best practice guidelines in rehabilitation. Although many institutions offer training opportunities to health care professionals who wish to undertake KBs roles, the characteristics and content of those educational training opportunities (ETOs) are currently unknown. This study aimed to describe the ETOs available to rehabilitation professionals in Canada and determine whether the ETOs meet the competencies expected of the KBs roles. METHODS We conducted a Canada-wide environmental scan to identify ETOs using three strategies: online search, phone calls, and snowball. To be included in the study, ETOs had to be offered to rehabilitation professionals in Canada and be targeting KBs competencies and/or roles. We mapped each of the content to the KBs competencies (knowledge and skills) within the five roles of KBs: information manager, linking agent, capacity builder, facilitator, and evaluator. RESULTS A total of 51 ETOs offered in three Canadian provinces, British Columbia, Ontario, and Quebec, were included in the analysis. For KBs competencies, 76% of ETOs equipped attendees with research skills, 55% with knowledge brokering skills, and 53% with knowledge on implementation science. For KBs roles, over 60% of ETOs supported attendees to in performing the capacity builder role and 39% the evaluator role. DISCUSSION Findings suggest that ETOs focused primarily on preparing participants with the research and knowledge brokering skills required to perform the capacity builder and evaluator roles. Comprehensive educational training covering all KBs roles and competencies are needed.
Collapse
|
10
|
Stier J, Smit SE. Co-creation as an innovative setting to improve the uptake of scientific knowledge: overcoming obstacles, understanding considerations and applying enablers to improve scientific impact in society. JOURNAL OF INNOVATION AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP 2021; 10:35. [PMID: 34603927 PMCID: PMC8475873 DOI: 10.1186/s13731-021-00176-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2020] [Accepted: 09/15/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
Impact-driven research is a EU priority and, increasingly, for universities around Europe. Still, there is need for specific strategies to improve the societal impact of scientific knowledge and therewith improve the uptake of scientific results. Co-creation deeply evolves the role of scientific knowledge and increases its impact. Albeit there is much research on the conceptualization and contextualization of co-creation, research on the microlevel dynamics of co-creation is less common. This article aims to understand the dynamics of and clarify the role of co-creation within and between quadruple helix actors (academia, government, industry and societal partners). Here, co-creation refers to the collaboration, where such actors actively join forces to address challenges. This paper revolves around insights from the European Commission Horizon 2020-project-Accomplissh (www.accomplissh.eu) which stands for "Accelerate co-creation by setting up a multi-actor platform for impact from Social Sciences and Humanities". The results lay bare a set of obstacles, areas of consideration and enablers in co-creation. This said, it is argued that scientific knowledge is optimally utilized when a set of guidelines or recommendations are followed and carried out by all involved actors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J. Stier
- Mälardalen University, Västerås, Sweden
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Minogue V, Matvienko-Sikar K, Hayes C, Morrissey M, Gorman G, Terres A. The usability and applicability of knowledge translation theories, models, and frameworks for research in the context of a national health service. Health Res Policy Syst 2021; 19:105. [PMID: 34311740 PMCID: PMC8314482 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-021-00747-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2021] [Accepted: 06/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Translating research findings into service improvements for patients and/or policy changes is a key challenge for health service organizations. The Health Service Executive (HSE) in Ireland launched the Action Plan for Health Research 2019-2029, as reported by Terrés (HSE, Dublin, 2019), one of the goals of which is to maximize the impact of the research that takes place within the service to achieve improvements in patient care, services, or policy change. The purpose of this research is to review the literature on knowledge translation theories, models, and frameworks (TMFs) and to assess the suitability of the TMFs for HSE use, selecting one or more for this purpose. The aim is to produce guidance for HSE researchers and other health services staff, validate the usability of the framework(s) with researchers, and review and implement the guidance. It was hoped that identifying a suitable methodology would provide the means to increase the uptake and application of research findings, and reduce research wastage. This paper reports on the first part of the study: the review, assessment, and selection of knowledge translation TMFs for a national health service. METHODS An interdisciplinary working group of academic experts in implementation science, research wastage, and knowledge translation, along with key representatives from research funders (Health Research Board) and HSE personnel with expertise in quality improvement and research management, undertook a three-stage review and selection process to identify a knowledge translation TMF that would be suitable and usable for HSE purposes. The process included a literature review, consensus exercise, and a final consensus workshop. The review group adopted the Theory Comparison and Selection Tool (T-CaST) developed by Birken et al. (Implement Sci 13: 143, 2018) to review knowledge translation theories, models, and frameworks. RESULTS From 247 knowledge translation TMFs initially identified, the first stage of the review identified 18 that met the criteria of validity, applicability, relevance, usability, and ability to be operationalized in the local context. A further review by a subgroup of the working group reduced this number to 11. A whole-group review selected six of these to be reviewed at a facilitated consensus workshop, which identified three that were suitable and applicable for HSE use. These were able to be mapped onto the four components of the HSE knowledge translation process: knowledge creation, knowledge into action, transfer and exchange of knowledge, and implementation and sustainability. CONCLUSION The multiplicity of knowledge translation TMFs presents a challenge for health service researchers in making decisions about the appropriate methods for disseminating their research. Building a culture that uses research knowledge and evidence is important for organizations seeking to maximize the benefits from research. Supporting researchers with guidance on how to disseminate and translate their research can increase the uptake and application of research findings. The use of robust selection criteria enabled the HSE to select relevant TMFs and develop a process for increasing the dissemination and translation of research knowledge. The guidance developed to inform and educate researchers and knowledge users is expected to increase organizational capacity to promote a culture of research knowledge and evidence use within the HSE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Virginia Minogue
- Research and Development, Strategy and Research, Health Service Executive, Dublin 8, Ireland.
| | | | - Catherine Hayes
- School of Medicine, Public Health and Primary Care, Trinity College, College Green, Dublin, Ireland.,Health Intelligence, Health Service Executive, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Mary Morrissey
- Research and Evidence, Strategy and Research, Health Service Executive, Dublin 8, Ireland
| | - Gregory Gorman
- School of Public Health, University College Cork, College Road, Cork, Ireland
| | - Ana Terres
- Research and Evidence, Strategy and Research, Health Service Executive, Dublin 8, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Anaby D, Khetani M, Piskur B, van der Holst M, Bedell G, Schakel F, de Kloet A, Simeonsson R, Imms C. Towards a paradigm shift in pediatric rehabilitation: Accelerating the uptake of evidence on participation into routine clinical practice. Disabil Rehabil 2021; 44:1746-1757. [PMID: 33832391 DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2021.1903102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Evidence for the importance of focusing on participation to promote health and wellbeing in childhood-onset disability exists, but practice is slow to change. This paper provides a knowledge translation roadmap to accelerate uptake of participation evidence into day-to-day practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS A structured roadmap to guide knowledge translation initiatives for implementing participation-based practices in co-creation with service users was developed based on elements from: the Five-factorframework for predicting implementation outcomes, the Cultural Cone framework, and the Knowledge-to-Action model. RESULTS Guiding principles paired with examples of multi-component knowledge implementation strategies to facilitate readiness for change by stakeholders at the micro (e.g., client/family, service providers), meso (e.g., administrators within organisations such as rehabilitation centres, hospitals, schools) and macro (e.g., local and governmental policy, regulatory bodies) levels are introduced. Solution-based strategies are provided to facilitate "readiness to change" for each stakeholder group. The strategies are examples for successful implementation of evidence-based interventions/approaches that can be contextualized across settings. CONCLUSIONS The knowledge translation roadmap can assist children and families, service providers, administrators, and policymakers to bridge existing knowledge-to-practice gaps surrounding participation. Partnering and collaborating through a "family-clinician-manager-community leader-policymaker" synergy is key for achieving strategic practice change focussed on participation.Implications for RehabilitationSound evidence surrounding the topic of participation, including effective assessments and interventions, is available and ready for use.Shifting towards participation-focused practices for children and youth with disabilities requires a systemic multi-level KT approach.Our Participation-KT roadmap, comprised of a framework and a list of principles and strategies for implementation, can be used to guide all stakeholders to foster a shift in practice.Forming partnerships and working collaboratively with all stakeholders is key for successful implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Anaby
- School of Physical and Occupation Therapy, McGill University, Quebec, Canada
| | - M Khetani
- University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - B Piskur
- Research Center Autonomy and Participation, Faculty of Health Care, Zuyd University of Applied Sciences, Heerlen, Netherlands
| | - M van der Holst
- Orthopaedics, Rehabilitation and Physical Therapy, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.,Basalt Rehabilitation Center, The Hague, Netherlands
| | - G Bedell
- Department of Occupational Therapy, Tufts University, Medford, MA, USA
| | - F Schakel
- Basalt Rehabilitation Center, The Hague, Netherlands
| | - A de Kloet
- Basalt Rehabilitation Center, The Hague, Netherlands.,The Hague University of Applied Sciences, The Haag, Netherlands
| | - R Simeonsson
- University of North Carolina, Chapel hill, NC, USA
| | - C Imms
- Faculty of Medicine Dentistry and Health Sciences Melbourne, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Pinto RM, Park S(E, Miles R, Ong PN. Community engagement in dissemination and implementation models: A narrative review. IMPLEMENTATION RESEARCH AND PRACTICE 2021; 2:2633489520985305. [PMID: 37089998 PMCID: PMC9978697 DOI: 10.1177/2633489520985305] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Responding to the growing demand for scientific understanding of adoption and uptake of evidence-based interventions (EBIs), numerous dissemination and implementation (“D&I”) models have been proposed in the extant literature. This review aimed to identify community-specific constructs with the potential to help researchers engage community partners in D&I studies or deploy EBIs. Methods: We identified 74 D&I models targeting community-level changes. We built on Tabak et al.’s narrative review that identified 51 D&I models published up to 2012 and identified 23 D&I models published between 2012 and 2020 from the Health Research & Practice website (16 models) and PubMed database (7 models). Three coders independently examined all 74 models looking for community-specific engagement constructs. Results: We identified five community engagement constructs: (1) Communication, (2) Partnership Exchange, (3) Community Capacity Building, (4) Leadership, and (5) Collaboration. Of the 74 models, 20% reflected all five constructs; 32%, four; 22%, three; 20%, two; and 5%, only one. Few models with strong community content have been introduced since 2009. Conclusion: This article bridges the community-engaged and D&I research literature by identifying community engagement constructs reflected in existing D&I models, targeting community-level changes. Implications for future research and practice are discussed. Plain language summary Responding to the growing demand for scientific understanding of adoption and uptake of evidence-based interventions (EBIs), numerous dissemination and implementation (“D&I”) models have been proposed. This review aimed to identify community-specific constructs with the potential to help researchers engage community partners in D&I studies or deploy EBIs. We identified 74 D&I models targeting community-level changes, published between 2012 and 2020. Three coders independently examined all 74 models looking for community-specific engagement constructs. We identified five community engagement constructs: (1) Communication, (2) Partnership Exchange, (3) Community Capacity Building, (4) Leadership, and (5) Collaboration. Of the 74 models, 20% reflected all five constructs; 32%, four; 22%, three; 20%, two; and 5%, only one. This article identified community engagement constructs reflected in existing D&I models targeting community-level changes. Implications for future research and practice are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rogério M Pinto
- School of Social Work, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | | | - Rashun Miles
- School of Social Work, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Pei Ni Ong
- School of Social Work, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Davis LF, Ramírez-Andreotta MD. Participatory Research for Environmental Justice: A Critical Interpretive Synthesis. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES 2021; 129:26001. [PMID: 33591210 PMCID: PMC7885999 DOI: 10.1289/ehp6274] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Environmental health risks are disproportionately colocated with communities in poverty and communities of color. In some cases, participatory research projects have effectively addressed structural causes of health risk in environmental justice (EJ) communities. However, many such projects fail to catalyze change at a structural level. OBJECTIVES This review employs Critical Interpretive Synthesis (CIS) to theorize specific elements of participatory research for environmental health that effectively prompt structural change in EJ communities. METHODS Academic database search was used to identify peer-reviewed literature describing participatory research with EJ communities to address environmental health. Synthetic constructs were developed iteratively related to study characteristics, design elements, and outcomes; and data were extracted for included records. Statistical analyses were performed to assess correlations between study design elements and structural change outcomes. Through critical, comparative, and contextual analyses of the "structural change" case study group and "non- structural change" group, informed by relevant theoretical literature, a synthesizing argument was generated. RESULTS From 505 total records identified, eligibility screening produced 232 case study articles, representing 154 case studies, and 55 theoretical articles for synthesis. Twenty-six case studies resulted in a structural change outcome. The synthesizing argument states that participatory research with EJ communities may be more likely to result in structural change when a) community members hold formal leadership roles; b) project design includes decision-makers and policy goals; and c) long term partnerships are sustained through multiple funding mechanisms. The assumption of EJ community benefit through research participation is critically examined. DISCUSSION Recommended future directions include establishing structural change as a goal of participatory research, employing participatory assessment of community benefit, and increased hiring of faculty of color at research institutions. The power, privilege, and political influence that academic institutions are able to leverage in partnership with EJ communities may be as valuable as the research itself. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP6274.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leona F Davis
- Department of Environmental Science, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA
| | - Mónica D Ramírez-Andreotta
- Department of Environmental Science, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA
- Division of Community, Environment & Policy, Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Changiz T, Yousefy A, Fakhari M. Research utilization process model: A cyclical, spiral, and developmental process to provide conclusive research knowledge in health professions education. Med J Islam Repub Iran 2020; 34:79. [PMID: 33306047 PMCID: PMC7711046 DOI: 10.34171/mjiri.34.79] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2019] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Research utilization plays an important role in evidence-based practice. Health professions education is a research-based discipline. Conclusive research knowledge is ranked as high level of evidence in evidence-based practice. This study was conducted to develop a model to reach conclusive research knowledge in health professions education.
Methods: This study was conducted in 2 phases. In the first phase, a qualitative content analysis of the literature was performed, which provided research utilization concepts to design a model. In the second phase, a group of 5 consultants of health professions education designed a preliminary model and revised it to develop an appropriate model for research utilization in health professions education.
Results: The indicators mentioned in 24 documents were extracted and later categorized into 25 items. Then, 8 concepts emerged, including problem identification, research design and implementation, research reports, research publication, presentation, research access, adoption, and research use. These concepts were arranged to design a model for research utilization in health professions education.
Conclusion: This study illustrated a cyclical, spiral, and developmental model to reach conclusive research knowledge. This model emphasizes both primary and secondary research projects to reach conclusive research knowledge. Also, it distinguishes between aligned transfer and cooperative presentation in research knowledge dissemination. This model reveals the importance of the process use in health profession education. Also, it distinguishes between use and misuse of research findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tahereh Changiz
- Department of Medical Education, Medical Education Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
| | - Alireza Yousefy
- Department of Medical Education, Medical Education Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
| | - Mohammad Fakhari
- Department of Medical Education, Medical Education Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Melder A, Robinson T, McLoughlin I, Iedema R, Teede H. An overview of healthcare improvement: unpacking the complexity for clinicians and managers in a learning health system. Intern Med J 2020; 50:1174-1184. [PMID: 32357287 DOI: 10.1111/imj.14876] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2019] [Revised: 03/12/2020] [Accepted: 04/05/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Given the pace of technological advancement and government mandates for healthcare and system transformation, there is an imperative for change. Health systems are highly complex in their design, networks and interacting components, and experience demonstrates that change is very challenging to enact, sustain and scale. Policy-makers, academics and clinicians all need better insight into the nature of this complexity and an understanding of the evidence-base that can support healthcare improvement (HCI), or quality improvement, interventions and make them more effective in driving change. The evidence base demonstrates the vital role of clinical engagement and leadership in HCI, and it is imperative that clinicians engage to improve front-line healthcare. The literature on HCI is vast, applies different and inconsistent terminology and encompasses often loosely defined and overlapping concepts. An increasingly broad range of disciplines has contributed to the available evidence base, but often discipline-specific perspectives frame these contributions. Available literature can also be overly driven by the generation of theoretical concepts and the advancement of academic understanding. It does not necessarily primarily provide focussed and pragmatic insights to guide and inform frontline practice. We aim to address these issues by summarising theories, frameworks, models and success factors for improvement in complex health systems to assist clinicians and others to engage and lead change. We integrate the field of HCI into the learning health system highlighting the key role of the clinician. We seek to inform stakeholders; clinicians and managers to guide the planning, enacting, sustaining and scaling of HCI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela Melder
- Monash Health, Australia.,Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Tracy Robinson
- School of Nursing, Midwifery and Indigenous Health, Charles Sturt University, Canberra, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Ian McLoughlin
- Monash Business School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - Helena Teede
- Monash Health, Australia.,Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Suart CE, Graham KJ, Suart TN, Truant R. Development of a knowledge translation platform for ataxia: Impact on readers and volunteer contributors. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0238512. [PMID: 32870931 PMCID: PMC7462291 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238512] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2020] [Accepted: 08/18/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Dissemination of accurate health research information to patients and families has become increasingly important with the rise of the internet as a means of finding health information. However, the public faces several barriers to accessing research information, including paywalls and technical jargon. One method to bridge this gap between patients, families, and research is using lay summaries. SCAsource is an online knowledge translation platform where peer-reviewed research papers on ataxia are translated into lay summaries. This online platform was launched in September 2018, with the goal of making ataxia research more accessible and understandable to patients and families. A secondary goal is to provide opportunities for ataxia researchers to develop and hone their knowledge translation skills, altogether improving the quality of patient communication in the ataxia community. Aim The aim of this study was to measure the impact of SCAsource on its readers and volunteer contributors after one year of activity. This is to ensure SCAsource is meeting its goals of (1) improving access and understanding of ataxia research to lay audiences, and (2) improving knowledge translation skills of volunteer contributors. Methods Two online surveys were launched, one for readers and one for volunteers. Each survey had a combination of multiple-choice, Likert-scale type, and open-ended short-answer questions. Descriptive quantitative analysis was used for respondent characteristics and Likert-type data. A grounded theory coding approach was used to analyze narrative feedback data. Results We found that SCAsource has mutually beneficial outcomes for both lay person readers and volunteer contributors. Readers have an increased understanding of ataxia research and access to up-to-date information on recent publications. Volunteers develop knowledge translation skills and have increased confidence in communicating results to lay audiences. Areas of improvement were identified to be incorporated into the platform. Conclusion We demonstrated that SCAsource improves access to information and understanding of research to lay audiences, while providing opportunities for researchers to develop knowledge translation skills. This framework can potentially be used by other rare disease organizations to launch and evaluate their own knowledge translation websites.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Celeste Elisabeth Suart
- Department of Biochemistry and Biomedical Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Katherine Jean Graham
- Department of Biochemistry and Biomedical Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Theresa Nowlan Suart
- School of Medicine and Faculty of Education, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ray Truant
- Department of Biochemistry and Biomedical Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
El Oussoul S, Haesebaert J, Leaune E, Haesebaert F. From Knowledge Transfer to Action: An Example of a Community of Practice for First-Episode Psychosis in Lyon, France. Psychiatr Serv 2020; 71:975-978. [PMID: 32460682 DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.201900568] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Despite the proven effectiveness of early intervention services for first-episode psychosis (FEP), these services are poorly implemented in France. This column describes the establishment in 2018 of a community of practice dedicated to the implementation of early intervention services for FEP at the Vinatier Hospital in Lyon, France, in 2019. To evaluate the implementation process, the authors analyzed materials produced during the process of conceiving and developing the community of practice, reviewed participant observation notes, and examined responses to a satisfaction survey completed by community of practice members. Creation of the community of practice network has led to substantial changes in care pathways for FEP patients in Greater Lyon.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sofia El Oussoul
- Centre Hospitalier le Vinatier, Bron, France (El Oussoul, Leaune, F. Haesebaert); Laboratoire HESPER (Health Services and Performance Research), Lyon, France (El Oussoul, J. Haesebaert); Centre de Recherche en Neurosciences de Lyon, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Bron, France (Leaune, F. Haesebaert). Marcela Horvitz-Lennon, M.D., and Kenneth Minkoff, M.D., are editors of this column
| | - Julie Haesebaert
- Centre Hospitalier le Vinatier, Bron, France (El Oussoul, Leaune, F. Haesebaert); Laboratoire HESPER (Health Services and Performance Research), Lyon, France (El Oussoul, J. Haesebaert); Centre de Recherche en Neurosciences de Lyon, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Bron, France (Leaune, F. Haesebaert). Marcela Horvitz-Lennon, M.D., and Kenneth Minkoff, M.D., are editors of this column
| | - Edouard Leaune
- Centre Hospitalier le Vinatier, Bron, France (El Oussoul, Leaune, F. Haesebaert); Laboratoire HESPER (Health Services and Performance Research), Lyon, France (El Oussoul, J. Haesebaert); Centre de Recherche en Neurosciences de Lyon, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Bron, France (Leaune, F. Haesebaert). Marcela Horvitz-Lennon, M.D., and Kenneth Minkoff, M.D., are editors of this column
| | - Frédéric Haesebaert
- Centre Hospitalier le Vinatier, Bron, France (El Oussoul, Leaune, F. Haesebaert); Laboratoire HESPER (Health Services and Performance Research), Lyon, France (El Oussoul, J. Haesebaert); Centre de Recherche en Neurosciences de Lyon, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Bron, France (Leaune, F. Haesebaert). Marcela Horvitz-Lennon, M.D., and Kenneth Minkoff, M.D., are editors of this column
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Votruba N, Grant J, Thornicroft G. The EVITA framework for evidence-based mental health policy agenda setting in low- and middle-income countries. Health Policy Plan 2020; 35:424-439. [PMID: 32040175 PMCID: PMC7195852 DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czz179] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/12/2019] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
Abstract
The burden of mental illness is excessive, but many countries lack evidence-based policies to improve practice. Mental health research evidence translation into policymaking is a 'wicked problem', often failing despite a robust evidence base. In a recent systematic review, we identified a gap in frameworks on agenda setting and actionability, and pragmatic, effective tools to guide action to link research and policy are needed. Responding to this gap, we developed the new EVITA 1.1 (EVIdence To Agenda setting) conceptual framework for mental health research-policy interrelationships in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). We (1) drafted a provisional framework (EVITA 1.0); (2) validated it for specific applicability to mental health; (3) conducted expert in-depth interviews to (a) validate components and mechanisms and (b) assess intelligibility, functionality, relevance, applicability and effectiveness. To guide interview validation, we developed a simple evaluation framework. (4) Using deductive framework analysis, we coded and identified themes and finalized the framework (EVITA 1.1). Theoretical agenda-setting elements were added, as targeting the policy agenda-setting stage was found to lead to greater policy traction. The framework was validated through expert in-depth interviews (n = 13) and revised. EVITA 1.1 consists of six core components [advocacy coalitions, (en)actors, evidence generators, external influences, intermediaries and political context] and four mechanisms (capacity, catalysts, communication/relationship/partnership building and framing). EVITA 1.1 is novel and unique because it very specifically addresses the mental health research-policy process in LMICs and includes policy agenda setting as a novel, effective mechanism. Based on a thorough methodology, and through its specific design and mechanisms, EVITA has the potential to improve the challenging process of research evidence translation into policy and practice in LMICs and to increase the engagement and capacity of mental health researchers, policy agencies/planners, think tanks, NGOs and others within the mental health research-policy interface. Next, EVITA 1.1 will be empirically tested in a case study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole Votruba
- Centre for Global Mental Health, Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience (IoPPN), King's College London, De Crespigny Park, Denmark Hill, London SE5 8AF, UK
- Centre for Implementation Science, Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience (IoPPN), King's College London, De Crespigny Park, Denmark Hill, London SE5 8AF, UK
| | - Jonathan Grant
- Policy Institute at King’s, King’s College London, 1st Floor, Virginia Woolf Building, 22 Kingsway, London WC2B 6LE, UK
| | - Graham Thornicroft
- Centre for Global Mental Health, Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience (IoPPN), King's College London, De Crespigny Park, Denmark Hill, London SE5 8AF, UK
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Miranda ÉDS, Figueiró AC, Potvin L. Are public health researchers in Brazil ready and supported to do knowledge translation? CAD SAUDE PUBLICA 2020; 36:e00003120. [PMID: 32267381 DOI: 10.1590/0102-311x00003120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2020] [Accepted: 01/27/2020] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Louise Potvin
- École de Santé Publique de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Newman K, DeForge R, Van Eerd D, Mok YW, Cornelissen E. A mixed methods examination of knowledge brokers and their use of theoretical frameworks and evaluative practices. Health Res Policy Syst 2020; 18:34. [PMID: 32216781 PMCID: PMC7099818 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-020-0545-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2019] [Accepted: 02/25/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Knowledge brokering is a knowledge translation approach that includes making connections between researchers and decision-makers to facilitate the latter's use of evidence in health promotion and the provision of healthcare. Despite knowledge brokering being well-established in Canada, many knowledge gaps exist, including understanding what theoretical frameworks have been developed and which evaluative practices knowledge brokers (KBs) use. METHODS This study used a mixed methods design to examine how KBs in Canada (1) use frameworks, models and theories in their practice and (2) how they evaluate knowledge brokering interventions. We gathered interview and survey data from KB practitioners to better understand their perspectives on effective practices. Our analysis focused on understanding the theoretical frameworks used by KBs. RESULTS This study demonstrates that KBs in Canada tend not to rely on theories or models that are specific to knowledge brokering. Rather, study participants/respondents draw on (sometimes multiple) theories and models that are fundamental to the broader field of knowledge translation - in particular, the Knowledge to Action model and the Promoting Action Research in Health Sciences framework. In evaluating the impact of their own knowledge brokering practice, participants/respondents use a wide variety of mechanisms. Evaluation was often seen as less important than supporting knowledge users and/or paying clients in accessing and utilising evidence. CONCLUSIONS Knowledge brokering as a form of knowledge translation continues to expand, but the impact on its targeted knowledge users has yet to be clearly established. The quality of engagement between KBs and their clients might increase - the knowledge brokering can be more impactful - if KBs made efforts to describe, understand and evaluate their activities using theories or models specific to KB.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristine Newman
- Daphne Cockwell School of Nursing, Ryerson University, Toronto, Canada
| | - Ryan DeForge
- World Health Innovation Network, Odette School of Business, University of Windsor, Windsor, Canada.
| | | | - Yan Wei Mok
- Daphne Cockwell School of Nursing, Ryerson University, Toronto, Canada
| | - Evelyn Cornelissen
- Department of Family Practice, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Gad M, Salem A, Oortwijn W, Hill R, Godman B. Mapping of Current Obstacles for Rationalizing Use of Medicines (CORUM) in Europe: Current Situation and Potential Solutions. Front Pharmacol 2020; 11:144. [PMID: 32194401 PMCID: PMC7063972 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2020.00144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2019] [Accepted: 02/04/2020] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction There are increasing concerns regarding the inappropriate use of medicines with expenditure continuing to grow driven by increasing sales in oncology and orphan diseases, enhanced by their emotive nature. As a result, even high income countries are struggling to fund new premium priced medicines. These concerns have resulted in initiatives to better manage the entry of new medicines and enhance the rational use of medicines (RUM). However, there is a need to ascertain the current situation. We sought to address this by developing the Current Obstacles for Rationalizing Use of Medicines in Europe (CORUM) mapping tool to qualitatively investigate the current situation and provide analysis of current views on RUM and interventions among key European payers and their advisers. The findings will be used to provide future guidance. Methodology Descriptive study exploring and identifying perceived gaps to achieving optimal RUM. The CORUM tool was based on the WHO 12 key interventions to promote RUM. Results 62 participants took part with most respondents believing their country could improve RUM capacity. This included educational initiatives on the use of clinical guidelines (90%) and the inclusion of problem-based pharmacotherapy in undergraduate curricula and for Continued Professional Development. Key challenges included a lack of regular updates of guidelines, exacerbated by limited funding and a lack of follow-up to monitor adherence to agreed guidelines. RUM could also be enhanced by the development of regional formularies as well as implementing Drug and Therapeutic Committees where these are currently limited. There also needs to be greater co-ordination between RUM and Health Technology Assessment activities, with countries learning from each other. Conclusion There is an urgent need to improve RUM through improved educational and other activities among European countries, with countries learning from each other. This will involve addressing current challenges and we will be following this up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamed Gad
- Global Health and Development Group, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Ahmed Salem
- Real World Evidence Solutions, IQVIA, Zaventem, Belgium
| | - Wija Oortwijn
- Department for Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Ruaraidh Hill
- Liverpool Reviews and Implementation Group, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Brian Godman
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden.,Strathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom.,Health Economics Centre, University of Liverpool Management School, Liverpool, United Kingdom.,Department of Public Health Pharmacy and Management, School of Pharmacy, Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University, Garankuwa, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Dobbins M, Greco L, Yost J, Traynor R, Decorby-Watson K, Yousefi-Nooraie R. A description of a tailored knowledge translation intervention delivered by knowledge brokers within public health departments in Canada. Health Res Policy Syst 2019; 17:63. [PMID: 31221187 PMCID: PMC6585045 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-019-0460-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2018] [Accepted: 05/15/2019] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background While there is an expectation to demonstrate evidence-informed public health there is an ongoing need for capacity development. The purpose of this paper is to provide a description of a tailored knowledge translation intervention implemented by knowledge brokers (KBs), and reflections on the factors that facilitated or hindered its implementation. Methods The 22-month knowledge translation intervention, implemented by two KBs, sought to facilitate evidence-informed public health decision-making. Data on outcomes were collected using a knowledge, skills and behavioural assessment survey. In addition, the KBs maintained reflective journals noting which activities appeared successful or not, as well as factors related to the individual or the organisation that facilitated or hindered evidence-informed decision-making. Results Tailoring of the knowledge translation intervention to address the needs, preferences and structure of each organisation resulted in three unique interventions being implemented. A consistent finding across organisations was that each site needed to determine where evidence-informed decision-making ‘fit’ within pre-existing organisational processes. Components of the intervention consistent across the three organisations included one-to-one mentoring of teams through rapid evidence reviews, large group workshops and regular meetings with senior management. Components that varied included the frequency of the KB being physically onsite, the amount of time staff spent with the KB and proportion of time spent one-to-one with a KB versus in workshops. Key facilitating factors for implementation included strong leadership, influential power of champions, supportive infrastructure, committed resources and staff enthusiasm. Conclusions The results of this study illustrate the importance of working collaboratively with organisations to tailor knowledge translation interventions to best meet unique needs, preferences, organisational structures and contexts. Organisational factors such as leadership, champions and supportive infrastructure play a key role in determining the impact of the knowledge translation interventions. Future studies should explore how these factors can be fostered and/or developed within organisations. While KBs implemented the knowledge translation intervention in this study, more research is needed to understand the impact of all change agent roles including KBs, as well as how these roles can be maintained in the long-term if proven effective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maureen Dobbins
- Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Nursing, McMaster University, 175 Longwood Road South, Suite 210A, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
| | - Lori Greco
- Region of Peel - Public Health, 7120 Hurontario Street, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jennifer Yost
- M. Louise Fitzpatrick College of Nursing, Villanova University, Driscoll Hall, Room 330, 800 Lancaster Avenue, Villanova, PA, United States of America
| | - Robyn Traynor
- Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Kara Decorby-Watson
- Centre for Person-Centered Practice Research, Queen Margaret University Edinburgh and Affiliate Member, Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Reza Yousefi-Nooraie
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Rochester, School of Medicine, 265 Crittenden Blvd., CU 420644, Rochester, New York, 14642, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Morris JH, Bernhardsson S, Bird ML, Connell L, Lynch E, Jarvis K, Kayes NM, Miller K, Mudge S, Fisher R. Implementation in rehabilitation: a roadmap for practitioners and researchers. Disabil Rehabil 2019; 42:3265-3274. [PMID: 30978129 DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2019.1587013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
Purpose: Despite growth in rehabilitation research, implementing research findings into rehabilitation practice has been slow. This creates inequities for patients and is an ethical issue. However, methods to investigate and facilitate evidence implementation are being developed. This paper aims to make these methods relevant and accessible for rehabilitation researchers and practitioners.Methods: Rehabilitation practice is varied and complex and occurs within multilevel healthcare systems. Using a "road map" analogy, we describe how implementation concepts and theories can inform implementation strategies in rehabilitation. The roadmap involves a staged journey that considers: the nature of evidence; context for implementation; navigation tools for implementation; strategies to facilitate implementation; evaluation of implementation outcomes; and sustainability of implementation. We have developed a model to illustrate the journey, and four case studies exemplify implementation stages in rehabilitation settings.Results and Conclusions: Effective implementation strategies for the complex world of rehabilitation are urgently required. The journey we describe unpacks that complexity to provide a template for effective implementation, to facilitate translation of the growing evidence base in rehabilitation into improved patient outcomes. It emphasizes the importance of understanding context and application of relevant theory, and highlights areas which should be targeted in new implementation research in rehabilitation.Implications for rehabilitationEffective implementation of research evidence into rehabilitation practice has many interconnected steps and a roadmap analogy is helpful in defining them.Understanding context for implementation is critically important and using theory can facilitate development of understanding.Research methods for implementation in rehabilitation should be carefully selected and outcomes should evaluate implementation success as well as clinical change.Sustainability requires regular revisiting of the interconnected steps.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacqui H Morris
- School of Nursing and Health Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
| | - Susanne Bernhardsson
- Närhälsan Research and Development Primary Health Care, Gothenburg, Sweden.,The Sahlgrenska Academy Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Marie-Louise Bird
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Louise Connell
- School of Health Sciences, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK
| | - Elizabeth Lynch
- Adelaide Nursing School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.,Stroke Division, The Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Victoria, Australia.,NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in Stroke Rehabilitation and Brain Recovery, Victoria, Australia
| | - Kathryn Jarvis
- School of Health Sciences, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK
| | - Nicola M Kayes
- Centre for Person Centred Research, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Kim Miller
- Evidence Centre, Sunny Hill Health Centre for Children, Vancouver, Canada.,Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, Canada
| | - Suzie Mudge
- Centre for Person Centred Research, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Rebecca Fisher
- School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Tumilowicz A, Ruel MT, Pelto G, Pelletier D, Monterrosa EC, Lapping K, Kraemer K, De Regil LM, Bergeron G, Arabi M, Neufeld L, Sturke R. Implementation Science in Nutrition: Concepts and Frameworks for an Emerging Field of Science and Practice. Curr Dev Nutr 2019; 3:nzy080. [PMID: 30864563 PMCID: PMC6400593 DOI: 10.1093/cdn/nzy080] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2018] [Revised: 06/04/2018] [Accepted: 10/02/2018] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Malnutrition in all its forms has risen on global and national agendas in recent years because of the recognition of its magnitude and its consequences for a wide range of human, social, and economic outcomes. Although the WHO, national governments, and other organizations have endorsed targets and identified appropriate policies, programs, and interventions, a major challenge lies in implementing these with the scale and quality needed to achieve population impact. This paper presents an approach to implementation science in nutrition (ISN) that builds upon concepts developed in other policy domains and addresses critical gaps in linking knowledge to effective action. ISN is defined here as an interdisciplinary body of theory, knowledge, frameworks, tools, and approaches whose purpose is to strengthen implementation quality and impact. It includes a wide range of methods and approaches to identify and address implementation bottlenecks; means to identify, evaluate, and scale up implementation innovations; and strategies to enhance the utilization of existing knowledge, tools, and frameworks based on the evolving science of implementation. The ISN framework recognizes that quality implementation requires alignment across 5 domains: the intervention, policy, or innovation being implemented; the implementing organization(s); the enabling environment of policies and stakeholders; the individuals, households, and communities of interest; and the strategies and decision processes used at various stages of the implementation process. The success of aligning these domains through implementation research requires a culture of inquiry, evaluation, learning, and response among program implementers; an action-oriented mission among the research partners; continuity of funding for implementation research; and resolving inherent tensions between program implementation and research. The Society for Implementation Science in Nutrition is a recently established membership society to advance the science and practice of nutrition implementation at various scales and in varied contexts.
Collapse
|
26
|
Prihodova L, Guerin S, Tunney C, Kernohan WG. Key components of knowledge transfer and exchange in health services research: Findings from a systematic scoping review. J Adv Nurs 2019; 75:313-326. [PMID: 30168164 PMCID: PMC7379521 DOI: 10.1111/jan.13836] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2018] [Revised: 06/28/2018] [Accepted: 08/06/2018] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
AIMS To identify the key common components of knowledge transfer and exchange in existing models to facilitate practice developments in health services research. BACKGROUND There are over 60 models of knowledge transfer and exchange designed for various areas of health care. Many of them remain untested and lack guidelines for scaling-up of successful implementation of research findings and of proven models ensuring that patients have access to optimal health care, guided by current research. DESIGN A scoping review was conducted in line with PRISMA guidelines. Key components of knowledge transfer and exchange were identified using thematic analysis and frequency counts. DATA SOURCES Six electronic databases were searched for papers published before January 2015 containing four key terms/variants: knowledge, transfer, framework, health care. REVIEW METHODS Double screening, extraction and coding of the data using thematic analysis were employed to ensure rigour. As further validation stakeholders' consultation of the findings was performed to ensure accessibility. RESULTS Of the 4,288 abstracts, 294 full-text articles were screened, with 79 articles analysed. Six key components emerged: knowledge transfer and exchange message, Stakeholders and Process components often appeared together, while from two contextual components Inner Context and the wider Social, Cultural and Economic Context, with the wider context less frequently considered. Finally, there was little consideration of the Evaluation of knowledge transfer and exchange activities. In addition, specific operational elements of each component were identified. CONCLUSIONS The six components offer the basis for knowledge transfer and exchange activities, enabling researchers to more effectively share their work. Further research exploring the potential contribution of the interactions of the components is recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucia Prihodova
- UCD School of PsychologyUniversity College DublinDublinIreland
- Palliative Care Research NetworkAll Ireland Institute for Hospice and Palliative CareDublinIreland
| | - Suzanne Guerin
- UCD School of PsychologyUniversity College DublinDublinIreland
- Palliative Care Research NetworkAll Ireland Institute for Hospice and Palliative CareDublinIreland
- UCD Centre for Disability StudiesUniversity College DublinDublinIreland
| | - Conall Tunney
- UCD Centre for Disability StudiesUniversity College DublinDublinIreland
| | - W. George Kernohan
- Palliative Care Research NetworkAll Ireland Institute for Hospice and Palliative CareDublinIreland
- Institute of Nursing and Health ResearchUlster UniversityBelfastNorthern Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Mallidou AA, Atherton P, Chan L, Frisch N, Glegg S, Scarrow G. Core knowledge translation competencies: a scoping review. BMC Health Serv Res 2018; 18:502. [PMID: 29945609 PMCID: PMC6020388 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-018-3314-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2018] [Accepted: 06/19/2018] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Knowledge translation (KT) is the broad range of activities aimed at supporting the use of research findings leading to evidence-based practice (EBP) and policy. Recommendations have been made that capacity building efforts be established to support individuals to enact KT. In this study, we summarized existing knowledge on KT competencies to provide a foundation for such capacity building efforts and to inform policy and research. Our research questions were "What are the core KT competencies needed in the health sector?" and "What are the interventions and strategies to teach and reinforce those competencies?" METHODS We used a scoping review approach and an integrated KT process by involving an Advisory Group of diverse stakeholders. We searched seven health and interdisciplinary electronic databases and grey literature sources for materials published from 2003 to 2017 in English language only. Empirical and theoretical publications in health that examined KT competencies were retrieved, reviewed, and synthesized. RESULTS Overall, 1171 publications were retrieved; 137 were fully reviewed; and 15 empirical and six conceptual academic, and 52 grey literature publications were included and synthesized in this scoping review. From both the academic and grey literature, we categorized 19 KT core competencies into knowledge, skills, or attitudes; and identified commonly used interventions and strategies to enhance KT competencies such as education, organizational support and hands-on training. CONCLUSIONS These initial core KT competencies for individuals provide implications for education, policy, knowledge brokering, and future research, and on the need for future evaluation of the KT competencies presented. We also discuss the essential role of organizational support and culture for successful KT activities/practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anastasia A. Mallidou
- School of Nursing, University of Victoria, B236 – HSD Building, 3800 Finnerty Road (Ring Road), Victoria, BC V8P 5C2 Canada
| | - Pat Atherton
- School of Nursing, University of Victoria, PO Box 1700 STN CSC, Victoria, BC V8W 2Y2 Canada
| | - Liza Chan
- Alberta Innovates – Health Solutions & University of Alberta, 1500, 10104 103 Ave, Edmonton, AB T5J 4A7 Canada
| | - Noreen Frisch
- School of Nursing, University of Victoria, B236 – HSD Building, 3800 Finnerty Road (Ring Road), Victoria, BC V8P 5C2 Canada
| | - Stephanie Glegg
- Sunny Hill Health Centre for Children, 3644 Slocan Street, Vancouver, BC V5M 3E8 Canada
| | - Gayle Scarrow
- Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research, 200 - 1285 West Broadway, Vancouver, BC V6H 3X8 Canada
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Haynes A, Rowbotham SJ, Redman S, Brennan S, Williamson A, Moore G. What can we learn from interventions that aim to increase policy-makers' capacity to use research? A realist scoping review. Health Res Policy Syst 2018; 16:31. [PMID: 29631606 PMCID: PMC5892006 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-018-0277-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2017] [Accepted: 01/09/2018] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Health policy-making can benefit from more effective use of research. In many policy settings there is scope to increase capacity for using research individually and organisationally, but little is known about what strategies work best in which circumstances. This review addresses the question: What causal mechanisms can best explain the observed outcomes of interventions that aim to increase policy-makers’ capacity to use research in their work? Methods Articles were identified from three available reviews and two databases (PAIS and WoS; 1999–2016). Using a realist approach, articles were reviewed for information about contexts, outcomes (including process effects) and possible causal mechanisms. Strategy + Context + Mechanism = Outcomes (SCMO) configurations were developed, drawing on theory and findings from other studies to develop tentative hypotheses that might be applicable across a range of intervention sites. Results We found 22 studies that spanned 18 countries. There were two dominant design strategies (needs-based tailoring and multi-component design) and 18 intervention strategies targeting four domains of capacity, namely access to research, skills improvement, systems improvement and interaction. Many potential mechanisms were identified as well as some enduring contextual characteristics that all interventions should consider. The evidence was variable, but the SCMO analysis suggested that tailored interactive workshops supported by goal-focused mentoring, and genuine collaboration, seem particularly promising. Systems supports and platforms for cross-sector collaboration are likely to play crucial roles. Gaps in the literature are discussed. Conclusion This exploratory review tentatively posits causal mechanisms that might explain how intervention strategies work in different contexts to build capacity for using research in policy-making. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12961-018-0277-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abby Haynes
- Sax Institute, 235 Jones Street, Ultimo, NSW, 2007, Australia. .,Sydney School of Public Health, Edward Ford Building (A27), University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, 2006, Australia.
| | - Samantha J Rowbotham
- Menzies Centre for Health Policy, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.,The Australian Prevention Partnership Centre, Ultimo, NSW, 2007, Australia
| | - Sally Redman
- Sax Institute, 235 Jones Street, Ultimo, NSW, 2007, Australia
| | - Sue Brennan
- Australasian Cochrane Centre, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, 3800, Australia
| | - Anna Williamson
- Sax Institute, 235 Jones Street, Ultimo, NSW, 2007, Australia
| | - Gabriel Moore
- Sax Institute, 235 Jones Street, Ultimo, NSW, 2007, Australia.,Sydney School of Public Health, Edward Ford Building (A27), University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, 2006, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Cheetham M, Wiseman A, Khazaeli B, Gibson E, Gray P, Van der Graaf P, Rushmer R. Embedded research: a promising way to create evidence-informed impact in public health? J Public Health (Oxf) 2018. [DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdx125] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- M Cheetham
- Health and Social Care Institute, Teesside University, Middlesbrough TS1 3BA, UK
- Fuse (UKCRC Centre for Translational Research in Public Health), Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne NE2 4AX, UK
| | - A Wiseman
- Gateshead Council, Public Health Team, Gateshead NE8 1NN, UK
| | - B Khazaeli
- Gateshead Council, Public Health Team, Gateshead NE8 1NN, UK
| | - E Gibson
- Gateshead Council, Public Health Team, Gateshead NE8 1NN, UK
| | - P Gray
- Gateshead Council, Public Health Team, Gateshead NE8 1NN, UK
| | - P Van der Graaf
- Health and Social Care Institute, Teesside University, Middlesbrough TS1 3BA, UK
- Fuse (UKCRC Centre for Translational Research in Public Health), Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne NE2 4AX, UK
| | - R Rushmer
- Health and Social Care Institute, Teesside University, Middlesbrough TS1 3BA, UK
- Fuse (UKCRC Centre for Translational Research in Public Health), Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne NE2 4AX, UK
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Brown KM, Elliott SJ, Leatherdale ST. Researchers Supporting Schools to Improve Health: Influential Factors and Outcomes of Knowledge Brokering in the COMPASS Study. THE JOURNAL OF SCHOOL HEALTH 2018; 88:54-64. [PMID: 29224218 DOI: 10.1111/josh.12578] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2016] [Revised: 03/02/2017] [Accepted: 09/18/2017] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although schools are considered opportune settings for youth health interventions, a gap between school health research and practice exists. COMPASS, a longitudinal study of Ontario and Alberta secondary students and schools (2012-2021), used integrated knowledge translation to enhance schools' uptake of research findings. Schools received annual summaries of their students' health behaviors and suggestions for action, and were linked with COMPASS knowledge brokers to support them in making changes to improve student health. This research examines the factors that influenced schools' participation in knowledge brokering and associated outcomes. METHODS School- and student-level data from the first 3 years of the COMPASS study (2012-2013; 2013-2014; 2014-2015) were used to examine factors that influenced knowledge brokering participation, school-level changes, and school-aggregated student health behaviors. RESULTS Both school characteristics and study-related factors influenced schools' participation in knowledge brokering. Knowledge brokering participation was significantly associated with school-level changes related to healthy eating, physical activity, and tobacco programming, but the impact of those changes was not evident at the aggregate student level. CONCLUSIONS Knowledge brokering provided a platform for collaboration between researchers and school practitioners, and led to school-level changes. These findings can inform future researcher-school practitioner partnerships to ultimately enhance student health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristin M Brown
- Centre for Teaching Excellence, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
| | - Susan J Elliott
- Department of Geography and Environmental Management, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
| | - Scott T Leatherdale
- CIHR-PHAC Chair in Applied Public Health Research, School of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Slaughter SE, Zimmermann GL, Nuspl M, Hanson HM, Albrecht L, Esmail R, Sauro K, Newton AS, Donald M, Dyson MP, Thomson D, Hartling L. Classification schemes for knowledge translation interventions: a practical resource for researchers. BMC Med Res Methodol 2017; 17:161. [PMID: 29207955 PMCID: PMC5718087 DOI: 10.1186/s12874-017-0441-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2017] [Accepted: 11/22/2017] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND As implementation science advances, the number of interventions to promote the translation of evidence into healthcare, health systems, or health policy is growing. Accordingly, classification schemes for these knowledge translation (KT) interventions have emerged. A recent scoping review identified 51 classification schemes of KT interventions to integrate evidence into healthcare practice; however, the review did not evaluate the quality of the classification schemes or provide detailed information to assist researchers in selecting a scheme for their context and purpose. This study aimed to further examine and assess the quality of these classification schemes of KT interventions, and provide information to aid researchers when selecting a classification scheme. METHODS We abstracted the following information from each of the original 51 classification scheme articles: authors' objectives; purpose of the scheme and field of application; socioecologic level (individual, organizational, community, system); adaptability (broad versus specific); target group (patients, providers, policy-makers), intent (policy, education, practice), and purpose (dissemination versus implementation). Two reviewers independently evaluated the methodological quality of the development of each classification scheme using an adapted version of the AGREE II tool. Based on these assessments, two independent reviewers reached consensus about whether to recommend each scheme for researcher use, or not. RESULTS Of the 51 original classification schemes, we excluded seven that were not specific classification schemes, not accessible or duplicates. Of the remaining 44 classification schemes, nine were not recommended. Of the 35 recommended classification schemes, ten focused on behaviour change and six focused on population health. Many schemes (n = 29) addressed practice considerations. Fewer schemes addressed educational or policy objectives. Twenty-five classification schemes had broad applicability, six were specific, and four had elements of both. Twenty-three schemes targeted health providers, nine targeted both patients and providers and one targeted policy-makers. Most classification schemes were intended for implementation rather than dissemination. CONCLUSIONS Thirty-five classification schemes of KT interventions were developed and reported with sufficient rigour to be recommended for use by researchers interested in KT in healthcare. Our additional categorization and quality analysis will aid in selecting suitable classification schemes for research initiatives in the field of implementation science.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Gabrielle L. Zimmermann
- Alberta SPOR SUPPORT Unit KT Platform, Edmonton, Canada
- University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| | - Megan Nuspl
- Alberta SPOR SUPPORT Unit KT Platform, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Heather M. Hanson
- University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
- Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Canada
| | | | - Rosmin Esmail
- University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
- Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Lisa Hartling
- University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
- Alberta SPOR SUPPORT Unit KT Platform, Edmonton, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Mickan S, Wenke R, Weir K, Bialocerkowski A, Noble C. Strategies for research engagement of clinicians in allied health (STRETCH): a mixed methods research protocol. BMJ Open 2017; 7:e014876. [PMID: 28899887 PMCID: PMC5640124 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014876] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Allied health professionals (AHPs) report positive attitudes to using research evidence in clinical practice, yet often lack time, confidence and skills to use, participate in and conduct research. A range of multifaceted strategies including education, mentoring and guidance have been implemented to increase AHPs' use of and participation in research. Emerging evidence suggests that knowledge brokering activities have the potential to support research engagement, but it is not clear which knowledge brokering strategies are most effective and in what contexts they work best to support and maintain clinicians' research engagement. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This protocol describes an exploratory concurrent mixed methods study that is designed to understand how allied health research fellows use knowledge brokering strategies within tailored evidence-based interventions, to facilitate research engagement by allied health clinicians. Simultaneously, a realist approach will guide a systematic process evaluation of the research fellows' pattern of use of knowledge brokering strategies within each case study to build a programme theory explaining which knowledge brokering strategies work best, in what contexts and why. Learning and behavioural theories will inform this critical explanation. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION An explanation of how locally tailored evidence-based interventions improve AHPs use of, participation in and leadership of research projects will be summarised and shared with all participating clinicians and within each case study. It is expected that local recommendations will be developed and shared with medical and nursing professionals in and beyond the health service, to facilitate building research capacity in a systematic and effective way.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sharon Mickan
- Allied Health Clinical Governance, Education and Research, Gold Coast Health, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
- School of Allied Health Sciences, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
| | - Rachel Wenke
- Allied Health Clinical Governance, Education and Research, Gold Coast Health, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
- School of Allied Health Sciences, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
| | - Kelly Weir
- Allied Health Clinical Governance, Education and Research, Gold Coast Health, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
- School of Allied Health Sciences, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
| | - Andrea Bialocerkowski
- School of Allied Health Sciences, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
| | - Christy Noble
- Allied Health Clinical Governance, Education and Research, Gold Coast Health, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
- School of Medicine, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
- School of Pharmacy, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Incorporation of a health economic modelling tool into public health commissioning: Evidence use in a politicised context. Soc Sci Med 2017. [PMID: 28628782 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.06.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
This paper explores how commissioners working in an English local government authority (LA) viewed a health economic decision tool for planning services in relation to diabetes. We conducted 15 interviews and 2 focus groups between July 2015 and February 2016, with commissioners (including public health managers, data analysts and council members). Two overlapping themes were identified explaining the obstacles and enablers of using such a tool in commissioning: a) evidence cultures, and b) system interdependency. The former highlighted the diverse evidence cultures present in the LA with politicians influenced by the 'soft' social care agendas affecting their local population and treating local opinion as evidence, whilst public health managers prioritised the scientific view of evidence informed by research. System interdependency further complicated the decision making process by recognizing interlinking with departments and other disease groups. To achieve legitimacy within the commissioning arena health economic modelling needs to function effectively in a highly politicised environment where decisions are made not only on the basis of research evidence, but on grounds of 'soft' data, personal opinion and intelligence. In this context decisions become politicised, with multiple opinions seeking a voice. The way that such decisions are negotiated and which ones establish authority is of importance. We analyse the data using Larson's (1990) discursive field concept to show how the tool becomes an object of research push and pull likely to be used instrumentally by stakeholders to advance specific agendas, not a means of informing complex decisions. In conclusion, LA decision making is underpinned by a transactional business ethic which is a further potential 'pull' mechanism for the incorporation of health economic modelling in local commissioning.
Collapse
|
34
|
Davies S, Herbert P, Wales A, Ritchie K, Wilson S, Dobie L, Thain A. Knowledge into action - supporting the implementation of evidence into practice in Scotland. Health Info Libr J 2017; 34:74-85. [DOI: 10.1111/hir.12159] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Sandra Davies
- Knowledge Services Group; NHS Education for Scotland; Glasgow UK
| | | | - Ann Wales
- Knowledge Services Group; NHS Education for Scotland; Glasgow UK
| | | | | | | | - Annette Thain
- Knowledge Services Group; NHS Education for Scotland; Glasgow UK
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Van Eerd D, Newman K, DeForge R, Urquhart R, Cornelissen E, Dainty KN. Knowledge brokering for healthy aging: a scoping review of potential approaches. Implement Sci 2016; 11:140. [PMID: 27756358 PMCID: PMC5070130 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-016-0504-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2016] [Accepted: 10/07/2016] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Developing a healthcare delivery system that is more responsive to the future challenges of an aging population is a priority in Canada. The World Health Organization acknowledges the need for knowledge translation frameworks in aging and health. Knowledge brokering (KB) is a specific knowledge translation approach that includes making connections between people to facilitate the use of evidence. Knowledge gaps exist about KB roles, approaches, and guiding frameworks. The objective of the scoping review is to identify and describe KB approaches and the underlying conceptual frameworks (models, theories) used to guide the approaches that could support healthy aging. METHODS Literature searches were done in PubMed, EMBASE, PsycINFO, EBM reviews (Cochrane Database of systematic reviews), CINAHL, and SCOPUS, as well as Google and Google Scholar using terms related to knowledge brokering. Titles, abstracts, and full reports were reviewed independently by two reviewers who came to consensus on all screening criteria. Documents were included if they described a KB approach and details about the underlying conceptual basis. Data about KB approach, target stakeholders, KB outcomes, and context were extracted independently by two reviewers. RESULTS Searches identified 248 unique references. Screening for inclusion revealed 19 documents that described 15 accounts of knowledge brokering and details about conceptual guidance and could be applied in healthy aging contexts. Eight KB elements were detected in the approaches though not all approaches incorporated all elements. The underlying conceptual guidance for KB approaches varied. Specific KB frameworks were referenced or developed for nine KB approaches while the remaining six cited more general KT frameworks (or multiple frameworks) as guidance. CONCLUSIONS The KB approaches that we found varied greatly depending on the context and stakeholders involved. Three of the approaches were explicitly employed in the context of health aging. Common elements of KB approaches that could be conducted in healthy aging contexts focussed on acquiring, adapting, and disseminating knowledge and networking (linkage). The descriptions of the guiding conceptual frameworks (theories, models) focussed on linkage and exchange but varied across approaches. Future research should gather KB practitioner and stakeholder perspectives on effective practices to develop KB approaches for healthy aging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dwayne Van Eerd
- Institute for Work and Health, 481 University Avenue, Suite 800, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5G 2E9. .,School of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, N2L 3G1.
| | - Kristine Newman
- Daphne Cockwell School of Nursing, Faculty of Community Services, Ryerson University, 350 Victoria Street, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5B 2K3
| | - Ryan DeForge
- World Health Innovation Network, Odette School of Business, University of Windsor, 401 Sunset Avenue, Windsor, Ontario, Canada, N9B 3P4
| | - Robin Urquhart
- Department of Surgery, Dalhousie University, 6299 South Street, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada, B3H 4R2
| | - Evelyn Cornelissen
- Department of Family Practice, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, 2312 Pandosy Street, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada, V1Y 1T3
| | - Katie N Dainty
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, 209 Victoria Street, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5B 1T8.,Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, 155 College Street, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5T 3M6
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Leeman J, Calancie L, Kegler MC, Escoffery CT, Herrmann AK, Thatcher E, Hartman MA, Fernandez ME. Developing Theory to Guide Building Practitioners' Capacity to Implement Evidence-Based Interventions. HEALTH EDUCATION & BEHAVIOR 2016; 44:59-69. [PMID: 26500080 DOI: 10.1177/1090198115610572] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Public health and other community-based practitioners have access to a growing number of evidence-based interventions (EBIs), and yet EBIs continue to be underused. One reason for this underuse is that practitioners often lack the capacity (knowledge, skills, and motivation) to select, adapt, and implement EBIs. Training, technical assistance, and other capacity-building strategies can be effective at increasing EBI adoption and implementation. However, little is known about how to design capacity-building strategies or tailor them to differences in capacity required across varying EBIs and practice contexts. To address this need, we conducted a scoping study of frameworks and theories detailing variations in EBIs or practice contexts and how to tailor capacity-building to address those variations. Using an iterative process, we consolidated constructs and propositions across 24 frameworks and developed a beginning theory to describe salient variations in EBIs (complexity and uncertainty) and practice contexts (decision-making structure, general capacity to innovate, resource and values fit with EBI, and unity vs. polarization of stakeholder support). The theory also includes propositions for tailoring capacity-building strategies to address salient variations. To have wide-reaching and lasting impact, the dissemination of EBIs needs to be coupled with strategies that build practitioners' capacity to adopt and implement a variety of EBIs across diverse practice contexts.
Collapse
|
37
|
Cellucci T, Lee S, Webster F. Adapting Knowledge Translation Strategies for Rare Rheumatic Diseases. J Rheumatol 2016; 43:1462-8. [PMID: 27134255 DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.151297] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/31/2016] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
Rare rheumatic diseases present unique challenges to knowledge translation (KT) researchers. There is often an urgent need to transfer knowledge from research findings into clinical practice to facilitate earlier diagnosis and better outcomes. However, existing KT frameworks have not addressed the specific considerations surrounding rare diseases for which gold standard evidence is not available. Several widely adopted models provide guidance for processes and problems associated with KT. However, they do not address issues surrounding creation or synthesis of knowledge for rare diseases. Additional problems relate to lack of awareness or experience in intended knowledge users, low motivation, and potential barriers to changing practice or policy. Strategies to address the challenges of KT for rare rheumatic diseases include considering different levels of evidence available, linking knowledge creation and transfer directly, incorporating patient and physician advocacy efforts to generate awareness of conditions, and selecting strategies to address barriers to practice or policy change.
Collapse
|
38
|
Call to Action for Nurses/Nursing. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2016; 2016:3127543. [PMID: 27144160 PMCID: PMC4837250 DOI: 10.1155/2016/3127543] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2015] [Revised: 02/08/2016] [Accepted: 03/29/2016] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
The 13 million nurses worldwide constitute most of the global healthcare workforce and are uniquely positioned to engage with others to address disparities in healthcare to achieve the goal of better health for all. A new vision for nurses involves active participation and collaboration with international colleagues across research practice and policy domains. Nursing can embrace new concepts and a new approach—“One World, One Health”—to animate nursing engagement in global health, as it is uniquely positioned to participate in novel ways to improve healthcare for the well-being of the global community. This opinion paper takes a historical and reflective approach to inform and inspire nurses to engage in global health practice, research, and policy to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals. It can be argued that a colonial perspective currently informs scholarship pertaining to nursing global health engagement. The notion of unidirectional relationships where those with resources support training of those less fortunate has dominated the framing of nursing involvement in low- and middle-income countries. This paper suggests moving beyond this conceptualization to a more collaborative and equitable approach that positions nurses as cocreators and brokers of knowledge. We propose two concepts, reverse innovation and two-way learning, to guide global partnerships where nurses are active participants.
Collapse
|
39
|
Reporting of Rehabilitation Intervention for Low Back Pain in Randomized Controlled Trials: Is the Treatment Fully Replicable? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2016; 41:412-8. [PMID: 26926164 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000001290] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Methodological review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). OBJECTIVE To assess the quality of reporting of rehabilitation interventions for mechanical low back pain (LBP) in published RCTs. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Reporting of interventions in RCTs often focused on the outcome value and failed to describe interventions adequately. METHODS We systematically searched for all RCTs in Cochrane systematic reviews on LBP published in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews until December 2013. The description of rehabilitation interventions of each RCT was evaluated independently by 2 of the investigators, using an ad hoc checklist of 7 items. The primary outcome was the number of items reported in sufficient details to be replicable in a new RCT or in everyday practice. RESULTS We found 11 systematic reviews, including 220 eligible RCTs, on LBP. Of those, 185 RCTs were included. The median publication year was 1998 (I-III quartiles, 1990 to 2004). The most reported items were the characteristics of participants (91.3%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 87.3-95.4), the intervention providers (81.1%; 95% CI, 75.4-86.7), and the intervention schedule (69.7%; 95% CI, 63-76). Based on the description of the intervention, less than one fifth would be replicable clinically. The proportion of trials providing all essential information about the participants and interventions increased from 14% (n = 7) in 1971 to 1980 to 20% (n = 75) in 2001 to 2010. CONCLUSION Despite the remarkable amount of energy spent producing RCTs in LBP rehabilitation, the majority of RCTs failed to report sufficient information that would allow the intervention to be replicated in clinical practice. Improving the quality of intervention description is urgently needed to better transfer research into rehabilitation practices. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 1.
Collapse
|
40
|
Werner-Seidler A, Perry Y, Christensen H. An Australian Example of Translating Psychological Research into Practice and Policy: Where We are and Where We Need to Go. Front Psychol 2016; 7:200. [PMID: 26925018 PMCID: PMC4759571 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2015] [Accepted: 02/02/2016] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Research findings from psychological science have identified interventions that will benefit human health. However, these findings are not often incorporated into practice-based settings or used to inform policy, in part, due to methodological and contextual limitations. A strategic approach is required if we are to find a way to facilitate the translation of these findings into areas that will offer genuine impact on health. There is an overwhelming focus on conducting more clinical trials, without consideration of how to ensure that findings from such trials make it to the patients or populations for whom they were intended. The aim of this paper is to outline how the Black Dog Institute, an Australian medical research institute, has created a framework designed to facilitate the translation of research findings into practice-based community settings, and how these findings can be used to inform policy. We propose that the core strategies adopted at the Black Dog Institute to prioritize and implement a translational program will be useful to institutes and organizations worldwide to augment the impact of their work. We provide several examples of how our research has been implemented in practice-based settings at a community-level, and how we have used research in psychology as a platform to inform policy change.
Collapse
|
41
|
Hurtubise K, Rivard L, Héguy L, Berbari J, Camden C. Virtual Knowledge Brokering: Describing the Roles and Strategies Used by Knowledge Brokers in a Pediatric Physiotherapy Virtual Community of Practice. THE JOURNAL OF CONTINUING EDUCATION IN THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS 2016; 36:186-194. [PMID: 27583995 DOI: 10.1097/ceh.0000000000000101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Knowledge transfer in pediatric rehabilitation is challenging and requires active, multifaceted strategies. The use of knowledge brokers (KBs) is one such strategy noted to promote clinician behavior change. The success of using KBs to transfer knowledge relies on their ability to adapt to ever-changing clinical contexts. In addition, with the rapid growth of online platforms as knowledge transfer forums, KBs must become effective in virtual environments. Although the role of KBs has been studied in various clinical contexts, their emerging role in specific online environments designed to support evidence-based behavior change has not yet been described. Our objective is to describe the roles of, and strategies used by, four KBs involved in a virtual community of practice to guide and inform future online KB interventions. METHODS A descriptive design guided this study and a thematic content analysis process was used to analyze online KB postings. The Promoting Action on Research in Health Sciences knowledge transfer framework and online andragogical learning theories assisted in the coding. A thematic map was created illustrating the links between KBs' strategies and emerging roles in the virtual environment. RESULTS We analyzed 95 posts and identified three roles: 1) context architect: promoting a respectful learning environment, 2) knowledge sharing promoter: building capacity, and 3) linkage creator: connecting research-to-practice. Strategies used by KBs reflected invitational, constructivism, and connectivism approaches, with roles and strategies changing over time. DISCUSSION This study increases our understanding of the actions of KBs in virtual contexts to foster uptake of research evidence in pediatric physiotherapy. Our results provide valuable information about the knowledge and skills required by individuals to fulfill this role in virtual environments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen Hurtubise
- Ms. Hurtubise: Doctoral Student, Faculté de médecine et sciences de la santé, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada. Dr. Rivard: Postdoctoral fellow, School of Rehabilitation Science, Faculty of Health Sciences, and CanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada. Ms. Héguy: Research Assistant, Faculté de médecine et sciences de la santé, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada. Ms. Berbari: Research Coordinator, Centre de recherche du centre hospitalier universitaire de Sherbrooke, QC, Canada. Dr. Camden: Assistant Professor, École de réadaptation, Faculté de médecine et sciences de la santé, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada, CanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada, and Centre de recherche du centre hospitalier universitaire de Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
van den Driessen Mareeuw F, Vaandrager L, Klerkx L, Naaldenberg J, Koelen M. Beyond bridging the know-do gap: a qualitative study of systemic interaction to foster knowledge exchange in the public health sector in The Netherlands. BMC Public Health 2015; 15:922. [PMID: 26387085 PMCID: PMC4575438 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-015-2271-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2015] [Accepted: 09/14/2015] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Despite considerable attention currently being given to facilitating the use of research results in public health practice, several concerns remain, resulting in the so-called know-do gap. This article aims to identify the key tensions causing the know-do gap from a broad perspective by using a systemic approach and considering the public health sector as an innovation system. Methods An exploratory qualitative design including in-depth semi-structured interviews was used, with 33 interviewees from different actor categories in the Dutch public health innovation system. The analyses employed an innovation system matrix to highlight the principal tensions causing the know-do gap. Results Seven key tensions were identified, including: research priorities determined by powerful players; no consensus about criteria for knowledge quality; different perceptions about the knowledge broker role; competition engendering fragmentation; thematic funding engendering fragmentation; predominance of passive knowledge sharing; and lack of capacity among users to use and influence research. Conclusions The identified tensions indicate that bridging the know-do gap requires much more than linking research to practice or translating knowledge. An innovation system perspective is crucial in providing information on the total picture of knowledge exchange within the Dutch public health sector. Such a system includes broader stakeholder involvement as well as the creation of social, economic, and contextual conditions (achieving shared visions, building networks, institutional change, removing financial and infrastructural barriers), as these create conducive factors at several system levels and induce knowledge co-creation and innovation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francine van den Driessen Mareeuw
- Radboud University Medical Center, Department of Primary and Community Care, Geert Grooteplein 21, 6525 EZ, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - Lenneke Vaandrager
- Health and Society Group, Department of Social Sciences, Wageningen University, Hollandseweg 1, 6706 KN, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
| | - Laurens Klerkx
- Knowledge, Technology and Innovation Group, Department of Social Sciences, Wageningen University, Hollandseweg 1, 6706 KN, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
| | - Jenneken Naaldenberg
- Radboud University Medical Center, Department of Primary and Community Care, Geert Grooteplein 21, 6525 EZ, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - Maria Koelen
- Health and Society Group, Department of Social Sciences, Wageningen University, Hollandseweg 1, 6706 KN, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Onyura B, Légaré F, Baker L, Reeves S, Rosenfield J, Kitto S, Hodges B, Silver I, Curran V, Armson H, Leslie K. Affordances of knowledge translation in medical education: a qualitative exploration of empirical knowledge use among medical educators. ACADEMIC MEDICINE : JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN MEDICAL COLLEGES 2015; 90:518-24. [PMID: 25470312 DOI: 10.1097/acm.0000000000000590] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/12/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Little is known about knowledge translation processes within medical education. Specifically, there is scant research on how and whether faculty incorporate empirical medical education knowledge into their educational practices. The authors use the conceptual framework of affordances to examine factors within the medical education practice environment that influence faculty utilization of empirical knowledge. METHOD In 2012, the authors, using a purposive sampling strategy, recruited medical education leaders in undergraduate medical education from a Canadian university. Recruits all had direct teaching and curricular development roles in either preclinical or clinical courses across the four years of the undergraduate curriculum. Data were collected through individual semistructured interviews on participants' use of empirical evidence, as well as the factors that influence integration of empirical knowledge into practice. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis. RESULTS Fifteen medical educators participated. The authors identified both constraining and facilitating affordances of empirical medical education knowledge use. Constraining affordances included poor quality and availability of evidence, inadequate knowledge delivery approaches, work and role overload, faculty and student change resistance, and resource limitations. Facilitating affordances included faculty development, peer recommendations, and local involvement in medical education knowledge creation. CONCLUSIONS Affordances of the medical education practice environment influence empirical knowledge use. Developing strategies for effective knowledge translation thus requires careful assessment of contextual factors that can enable, constrain, or inhibit evidence use. Empirical knowledge use is most likely to occur among medical educators who are afforded rich, facilitative opportunities for participation in creating, seeking, and implementing knowledge.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Betty Onyura
- Dr. Onyura is research and evaluation consultant, Centre for Faculty Development, Li Ka Shing International Healthcare Education Centre, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Dr. Le´gare´ is Canada Research Chair in Implementation of Shared Decision Making in Primary Care and professor, Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Laval University, Québec, Québec, Canada. Ms. Baker is research and education consultant, Centre for Faculty Development, Li Ka Shing International Healthcare Education Centre, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Dr. Reeves is professor of interprofessional research, Faculty of Health, Social Care and Education, Kingston University and St. Georges, University of London, London, United Kingdom. Dr. Rosenfield is professor, Faculty of Medicine, and vice dean of undergraduate medical education, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Dr. Kitto is a medical sociologist and assistant professor, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Dr. Hodges is professor, Faculty of Medicine and Faculty of Education, University of Toronto, and vice president of education, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Dr. Silver is professor, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, and vice president of education, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Dr. Curran is professor, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Newfoundland, Canada. Dr. Armson is director of research, Foundation of Medical Practice Education, and professor, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada. Dr. Leslie is director, Centre for Faculty Development, Li Ka Shing International Healthcare Education Centre, St. Michael's Hospital, and associate professor, Department of Pediatrics, University of Toronto, Faculty of Medicine, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Elueze IN. Evaluating the effectiveness of knowledge brokering in health research: a systematised review with some bibliometric information. Health Info Libr J 2015; 32:168-81. [PMID: 25753773 DOI: 10.1111/hir.12097] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2014] [Accepted: 01/27/2015] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to identify the effectiveness of knowledge brokering as a knowledge translation (KT) strategy used in promoting evidence-based decision-making, evidence-based practice or collaboration between researchers, health practitioners and policymakers. METHODS A systematised review of literature was performed using MEDLINE (through ProQuest Dialog), PubMed and Scopus electronic databases. A search strategy was developed to identify primary studies indexed in these databases on knowledge translation that reported the implementation of knowledge brokering. Sixty-two titles related to knowledge brokering were identified from the search after the removal of duplicates, and 24 articles met the eligibility criteria following the review of the full text documents. The findings were then synthesised using a narrative approach. RESULTS It was found that knowledge brokering has been an effective strategy for knowledge translation. CONCLUSION Although this review shows that knowledge brokering has been an effective strategy for KT, it advocates for more empirical studies to compare the effectiveness of specific knowledge brokering approaches with others. It also calls for empirical studies to explicate the role of library and information science professionals in knowledge brokering.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isioma N Elueze
- Library and Information Science, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Lokker C, McKibbon KA, Colquhoun H, Hempel S. A scoping review of classification schemes of interventions to promote and integrate evidence into practice in healthcare. Implement Sci 2015; 10:27. [PMID: 25885047 PMCID: PMC4352247 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-015-0220-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2014] [Accepted: 02/17/2015] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many models and frameworks are currently used to classify or describe knowledge translation interventions to promote and integrate evidence into practice in healthcare. METHODS We performed a scoping review of intervention classifications in public health, clinical medicine, nursing, policy, behaviour science, improvement science and psychology research published to May 2013 by searching MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL and the grey literature. We used five stages to map the literature: identifying the research question; identifying relevant literature; study selection; charting the data; collating, summarizing, and reporting results. RESULTS We identified 51 diverse classification schemes, including 23 taxonomies, 15 frameworks, 8 intervention lists, 3 models and 2 other formats. Most documents were public health based, 55% included a literature or document review, and 33% were theory based. CONCLUSIONS This scoping review provides an overview of schemes used to classify interventions which can be used for evaluation, comparison and validation of existing and emerging models. The collated taxonomies can guide authors in describing interventions; adequate descriptions of interventions will advance the science of knowledge translation in healthcare.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cynthia Lokker
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Health Information Research Unit, McMaster University, CRL Building, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, L8S 4 K1, ON, Canada.
| | - K Ann McKibbon
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Health Information Research Unit, McMaster University, CRL Building, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, L8S 4 K1, ON, Canada.
| | - Heather Colquhoun
- Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University of Toronto, 160-500 University Avenue, Toronto, ON, M5G 1 V7, Canada.
| | - Susanne Hempel
- RAND Corporation, 1776 Main Street, m4339, Santa Monica, 90407, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Waterman H, Boaden R, Burey L, Howells B, Harvey G, Humphreys J, Rothwell K, Spence M. Facilitating large-scale implementation of evidence based health care: insider accounts from a co-operative inquiry. BMC Health Serv Res 2015; 15:60. [PMID: 25889054 PMCID: PMC4339083 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-015-0722-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2014] [Accepted: 01/30/2015] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Facilitators are known to be influential in the implementation of evidence-based health care (EBHC). However, little evidence exists on what it is that they do to support the implementation process. This research reports on how knowledge transfer associates (KTAs) working as part of the UK National Institute for Health Research ‘Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care’ for Greater Manchester (GM CLAHRC) facilitated the implementation of EBHC across several commissioning and provider health care agencies. Methods A prospective co-operative inquiry with eight KTAs was carried out comprising of 11 regular group meetings where they reflected critically on their experiences. Twenty interviews were also conducted with other members of the GM CLAHRC Implementation Team to gain their perspectives of the KTAs facilitation role and process. Results There were four phases to the facilitation of EBHC on a large scale: (1) Assisting with the decision on what EBHC to implement, in this phase, KTAs pulled together people and disparate strands of information to facilitate a decision on which EBHC should be implemented; (2) Planning of the implementation of EBHC, in which KTAs spent time gathering additional information and going between key people to plan the implementation; (3) Coordinating and implementing EBHC when KTAs recruited general practices and people for the implementation of EBHC; and (4) Evaluating the EBHC which required the KTAs to set up (new) systems to gather data for analysis. Over time, the KTAs demonstrated growing confidence and skills in aspects of facilitation: research, interpersonal communication, project management and change management skills. Conclusion The findings provide prospective empirical data on the large scale implementation of EBHC in primary care and community based organisations focusing on resources and processes involved. Detailed evidence shows facilitation is context dependent and that ‘one size does not fits all’. Co-operative inquiry was a useful method to enhance KTAs learning. The evidence shows that facilitators need tailored support and education, during the process of implementation to provide them with a well-rounded skill-set. Our study was not designed to demonstrate how facilitators contribute to patient health outcomes thus further prospective research is required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heather Waterman
- School of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, Jean McFarlane Building, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
| | - Ruth Boaden
- Manchester Business School, University of Manchester, Booth St. West, Manchester, M15 6 PB, UK.
| | - Lorraine Burey
- CLAHRC, 3rd Floor Mayo Building, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Stott Lane, Salford, M6 8HD, UK.
| | - Brook Howells
- Advancing Quality Alliance, Salford Royal NHS Foundation trust, Stott Lane, Salford, M6 8HD, UK.
| | - Gill Harvey
- Manchester Business School, University of Manchester, Booth St. West, Manchester, M15 6 PB, UK. .,School of Nursing, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
| | - John Humphreys
- CLAHRC, 3rd Floor Mayo Building, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Stott Lane, Salford, M6 8HD, UK.
| | - Katy Rothwell
- CLAHRC, 3rd Floor Mayo Building, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Stott Lane, Salford, M6 8HD, UK.
| | - Michael Spence
- CLAHRC, 3rd Floor Mayo Building, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Stott Lane, Salford, M6 8HD, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Dagenais C, Somé TD, Boileau-Falardeau M, McSween-Cadieux E, Ridde V. Collaborative development and implementation of a knowledge brokering program to promote research use in Burkina Faso, West Africa. Glob Health Action 2015; 8:26004. [PMID: 25630708 PMCID: PMC4309833 DOI: 10.3402/gha.v8.26004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2014] [Revised: 12/15/2014] [Accepted: 12/16/2014] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Despite efforts expended over recent decades, there is a persistent gap between the production of scientific evidence and its use. This is mainly due to the difficulty of bringing such knowledge to health workers and decision-makers so that it can inform practices and decisions on a timely basis. One strategy for transferring knowledge to potential users, that is, gaining increasing legitimacy, is knowledge brokering (KB), effectiveness of which in certain conditions has been demonstrated through empirical research. However, little is known about how to implement such a strategy, especially in the African context. The KB program presented here is aimed specifically at narrowing the gap by making scientific knowledge available to users with the potential to improve health-related practices and decision making in Burkina Faso. The program involves Canadian and African researchers, a knowledge broker, health practitioners, and policy-makers. This article presents the collaborative development of the KB strategy and the evaluation of its implementation at year 1. The KB strategy was developed in stages, beginning with a scoping study to ensure the most recent studies were considered. Two one-day workshops were then conducted to explore the problem of low research use and to adapt the strategy to the Burkinabè context. Based on these workshops, the KB program was developed and brokers were recruited and trained. Evaluation of the program's implementation after the first year showed that: 1) the preparatory activities were greatly appreciated by participants, and most considered the content useful for their work; 2) the broker had carried out his role in accordance with the logic model; and 3) this role was seen as important by the participants targeted by the activities and outputs. Participants made suggestions for program improvements in subsequent years, stressing particularly the need to involve decision-makers at the central level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Dagenais
- Department of Psychology, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada;
| | - Télesphore D Somé
- Knowledge Broker, Société d'Études et de Recherche en Santé Publique, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso
| | | | | | - Valéry Ridde
- University of Montreal School of Public Health, University of Montreal Hospital Research Centre (CRCHUM), Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Holle D, Roes M, Buscher I, Reuther S, Müller R, Halek M. Process evaluation of the implementation of dementia-specific case conferences in nursing homes (FallDem): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2014; 15:485. [PMID: 25496425 PMCID: PMC4295267 DOI: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-485] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2014] [Accepted: 12/01/2014] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Challenging behaviors exhibited by individuals with dementia might result from an unmet need that they cannot communicate directly due to cognitive restrictions. A dementia-specific case conference represents a promising means of analyzing and exploring these unmet needs. The ongoing FallDem study is a stepped-wedged, cluster-randomized trial evaluating the effects of two different types of dementia-specific case conferences on the challenging behaviors of nursing home residents. This study protocol describes the process evaluation that is conducted, along with the FallDem study. The goal of the process evaluation is to explain potential discrepancies between expected and observed outcomes, and to provide insights into implementation processes and recruitment strategies, as well as the contexts and contextual factors that promote or inhibit the implementation of dementia-specific case conferences. Methods/Design The process evaluation will use a mixed-method design comprising longitudinal elements, in which quantitative and qualitative data will be gathered. Qualitative data will be analyzed using content analysis, documentary analysis and a documentary method. Quantitative data (standardized questionnaires) will be analyzed using descriptive statistics. Both types of data will complement one another and provide a more comprehensive picture of the different objects under investigation. Discussion The process evaluation will allow for a comprehensive understanding of the changing processes and mechanisms underlying the ‘black box’ of the complex intervention of the FallDem study. These findings will provide practical knowledge regarding issues related to the implementation of dementia-specific case conferences in nursing homes. Trial registration Current Controlled Trials identifier: ISRCTN20203855, registered on 10th July 2013.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniela Holle
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Stockumer Str, 12, 58453 Witten, Germany.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
khoddam H, Mehrdad N, Peyrovi H, Kitson AL, Schultz TJ, Athlin AM. Knowledge translation in health care: a concept analysis. Med J Islam Repub Iran 2014; 28:98. [PMID: 25664299 PMCID: PMC4301207] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2014] [Accepted: 04/07/2014] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although knowledge translation is one of the most widely used concepts in health and medical literature, there is a sense of ambiguity and confusion over its definition. The aim of this paper is to clarify the characteristics of KT. This will assist the theoretical development of it and shape its implementation into the health care system Methods: Walker and Avant's framework was used to analyze the concept and the related literature published between 2000 and 2010 was reviewed. A total of 112 papers were analyzed. RESULTS Review of the literature showed that "KT is a process" and "implementing refined knowledge into a participatory context through a set of challenging activities" are the characteristics of KT. Moreover, to occur successfully, KT needs some necessary antecedents like an integrated source of knowledge, a receptive context, and preparedness. The main consequence of successful process is a change in four fields of healthcare, i.e. quality of patient care, professional practice, health system, and community. In addition, this study revealed some empirical referents which are helpful to evaluate the process. CONCLUSION By aiming to portray a clear picture of KT, we highlighted its attributes, antecedents, consequences and empirical referents. Identifying the characteristics of this concept may resolve the existing ambiguities in its definition and boundaries thereby facilitate distinction from similar concepts. In addition, these findings can be used as a knowledge infrastructure for developing the KT-related models, theories, or tools.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Homeira khoddam
- 1. PhD candidate of Nursing, Nursing and Midwifery School of Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, & Faculty member of Nursing and Midwifery school, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran.
| | - Neda Mehrdad
- 2. Associate Professor of Nursing, Knowledge Utilization Research Center (KURC) &Endocrinology and Metabolism Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
| | - Hamid Peyrovi
- 3. Associate Professor of Nursing, Nursing and Midwifery School, Iran University of Medical Sciences & Centre for Nursing Care Research, Nursing and Midwifery School of Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
| | - Alison L Kitson
- 4. Professor of Nursing, School of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, the University of Adelaide & Centres for Evidence Based Practice South Australia, School of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, the University of Adelaide, Green Templeton Colleges, University of Oxford, UK.
| | - Timothy J Schultz
- 5. Research Fellow in School of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, the University of Adelaide & Technical Director at Australian Patient Safety Foundation, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.
| | - Asa Muntlin Athlin
- 6. Researcher at Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden & Department of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Hitch D, Rowan S, Nicola-Richmond K. A case study of knowledge brokerage in occupational therapy. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THERAPY AND REHABILITATION 2014. [DOI: 10.12968/ijtr.2014.21.8.389] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Susan Rowan
- Manager of occupational therapy services at Barwon Health
| | | |
Collapse
|