Neuroendocrine tumor in gastric adenoma: a diagnostic pitfall mimicking invasive adenocarcinoma

Mixed adenoma-neuroendocrine tumor of the stomach: analysis of nine cases with literature review

Mixed adenoma-neuroendocrine tumor (MANET) comprises adenoma and well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor (NET) components. Given the limited information on this due to its rarity, we aimed to clarify the clinicopathologic features and optimal management of gastric MANETs in a case series and literature review. Nine patients with gastric MANETs, including eight male and one female patient (mean age, 72 years), were identified from the institutional pathology archive. Endoscopically, the tumors appeared as flat elevated lesions with sizes ranging from 0.8 to 4.4 cm. One patient had familial adenomatous polyposis, and no patient had autoimmune gastritis. All MANETs developed in the gastric body mucosa exhibiting chronic metaplastic atrophic gastritis. The glandular components were intestinal-type low-grade adenoma, and focal high-grade dysplasia was also recognized in three cases. The NET component was in middle/deep lamina propria in six cases and confined to deep lamina propria in the remaining three cases. Minimal cytologic atypia was found in the NET component, with no recognizable mitosis and a Ki-67 labeling index of < 2%. The NET component mostly showed diffuse positivity for serotonin and CDX2, suggesting that it consists of enterochromaffin cells. Diffuse p53 immunostaining was observed only in the high-grade adenomatous component of one case. No recurrence was observed during the follow-up period of 2-94 months. Correct distinction between the NET and poorly differentiated carcinoma components is crucial to prevent overtreatment of gastric MANETs. Considering its indolent nature, endoscopic resection is the primary recommendation for gastric MANETs as well as for pure adenomas.

Gastric mixed adenoma-neuroendocrine tumor: A case report

BACKGROUND

Gastric mixed adenoma-neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are quite rare. In the 2019 world health organization classification of tumors of the digestive system, these were designated as a combination of grade 1 or grade 2 NETs and adenomas or tubular adenomas. There are no treatment guidelines for these tumors, and pathological and clinical studies are ongoing. Herein, we review previous case reports and present a case of gastric mixed adenoma-NET.

CASE SUMMARY

A 66-year-old man underwent gastrointestinal endoscopy for the evaluation of upper abdominal pain. Histopathological examination of the biopsy specimen indicated the possibility of gastric cancer. A histopathological examination by endoscopic submucosal dissection showed a mixed adenoma-NET that was completely excised by endoscopic submucosal dissection. No recurrence was observed on gastrointestinal endoscopy at the 6-mo follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Clinicians' awareness of this rare tumor is important for its timely diagnosis and treatment.

A case report of a gastric neuroendocrine tumor arising from gastric adenoma

Background : Composite glandular/exocrine-endocrine neoplasms of the gastrointestinal tract are a special tumor type. There are only three reports in English on secondary gastric neuroendocrine tumor (G-NET) arising from gastric adenoma. Here, we describe a rare case of a G-NET arising from a gastric adenoma. Case presentation: A 69-year-old man underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy as part of a general health check-up. An endoscopic examination revealed a 5-mm elevated tumor on the fornix of the stomach. Further, atrophic changes in the gastric mucosa were not noted. The tumor was diagnosed as a gastric adenoma; thus, endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) was performed. Histologically, the tumor was composed of two components, an epithelial component, which was diagnosed as an adenoma, and a depth component, which was diagnosed as a neuroendocrine tumor. The neuroendocrine tumor was diagnosed as a Grade 2 G-NET arising from the gastric adenoma. Histologically, the tumor invaded the submucosal layer (&gt;1000 μm), invading the lymph vessels, additional gastrectomy was performed. Pathologist revealed no remaining tumor or lymph node metastases in the resected specimen. Conclusions : We report this extremely rare case of a G-NET (Grade 2), initially diagnosed as a gastric adenoma, that is considered to have originated from the gastric adenoma. Pathologists, endoscopists and surgeons should be aware of the occurrence and association of NETs with adenomas in the stomach because small submucosal NETs of the stomach have relatively high metastatic rates.

Mixed Adenoma Well-differentiated Neuroendocrine Tumor (MANET) of the Digestive System: An Indolent Subtype of Mixed Neuroendocrine-NonNeuroendocrine Neoplasm (MiNEN)

Mixed neuroendocrine-nonneuroendocrine neoplasm (MiNEN) consisting of adenoma and well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor (NET) has been recently defined as "MANET." However, the clinico-pathologic and pathogenetic features of this entity are not thoroughly studied. We examined the clinico-pathologic features of 12 MANETs by expanding their p53 and β-catenin expression profiles as well as the presence of microsatellite instability and KRAS, BRAF, and PIK3CA mutations in the 2 tumor components. In all cases, the adenomatous component represented the larger part of the lesions and the NET was localized in the deep central portion of polyps. In 9 cases the latter was represented by NET G1, in 2 by NET G2, and in 1 by NET G3. In all cases, the glandular and NET components were intimately admixed, with zone of transition between the tumor components. The NET component was p53 negative in all cases and 3 of 8 cases showed variable nuclear positivity for β-catenin. All patients with follow-up data were alive and free of disease after a mean follow-up time of 9 years. No mutations in KRAS, BRAF, and PIK3CA genes and no microsatellite instability were found in both tumor components. Review of the literature also identified 59 previously reported MANETs and no tumor-related death has been found. Like mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinomas, a high-grade malignant form of MiNENs with a poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma component, a common origin for both tumor constituents may be hypothesized. Moreover, the current series provides evidence that MANET is an indolent disease that needs to be distinguished from aggressive high-grade MiNENs.

Mixed Neuroendocrine-Nonneuroendocrine Neoplasms (MiNENs): Unifying the Concept of a Heterogeneous Group of Neoplasms

The wide application of immunohistochemistry to the study of tumors has led to the recognition that epithelial neoplasms composed of both a neuroendocrine and nonneuroendocrine component are not as rare as traditionally believed. It has been recommended that mixed neuroendocrine-nonneuroendocrine epithelial neoplasms are classified as only those in which either component represents at least 30 % of the lesion but this cutoff has not been universally accepted. Moreover, since their pathogenetic and clinical features are still unclear, mixed neuroendocrine-nonneuroendocrine epithelial neoplasms are not included as a separate clinicopathological entity in most WHO classifications, although they have been observed in virtually all organs. In the WHO classification of digestive tumors, mixed neuroendocrine-nonneuroendocrine neoplasm is considered a specific type and is defined as mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma, a definition that has not been accepted for other organs. In fact, this term does not adequately convey the morphological and biological heterogeneity of digestive mixed neoplasms and has created some misunderstanding among both pathologists and clinicians. In the present study, we have reviewed the literature on mixed neuroendocrine-nonneuroendocrine epithelial neoplasms reported in the pituitary, thyroid, nasal cavity, larynx, lung, digestive system, urinary system, male and female genital organs, and skin to give the reader an overview of the most important clinicopathological features and morphological criteria for diagnosing each entity. We also propose to use the term "mixed neuroendocrine-nonneuroendocrine neoplasm (MiNEN)" to define and to unify the concept of this heterogeneous group of neoplasms, which show different characteristics mainly depending on the type of neuroendocrine and nonneuroendocrine components.

A Previously Undescribed Presentation of Mixed Adenoneuroendocrine Carcinoma

We report a case of mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma (MANEC) of stomach with tubular adenoma and well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor (WD-NET) in the primary tumor in the stomach giving rise to biphenotypic regional nodal metastases. A 35-year-old woman with abdominal pain was found to have a 1.8-cm gastric lesion, diagnosed as WD-NET (intermediate grade) on the biopsy. The resection specimen contained residual WD-NET; there was also a gastric adenoma adjacent to the NET and nodal metastasis with both adeno- and neuroendocrine components. The tumor was classified as MANEC. Of note, the entire gastric tissue was submitted and multiple deeper levels of the adenomatous lesion were examined; no adenocarcinoma was present in the primary lesion. While association of gastric adenoma with neuroendocrine neoplasm is rare, presence of biphenotypic metastasis originating from such a lesion is highly unusual and to the best of our knowledge has not been reported.

Republished: gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms and related precursor lesions

Gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are a heterogeneous group of tumours showing different clinicopathological features and behaviour, implying a wide spectrum of therapeutic options. They are currently classified using the 2010 WHO classification of digestive neuroendocrine neoplasms into G1-neuroendocrine tumours (NETs), G2-NETs, neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) and mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinomas (MANECs). However, most gastric NENs are composed of ECL-cells (ECL-cell NETs) that can be preceded by ECL-cell hyperplastic and dysplastic lesions, whose oncologic potential has not yet been completely elucidated. ECL-cell NETs differ considerably in terms of prognosis depending on the proliferative status and clinicopathological background. The integration of both aspects in the diagnostic pathway may help to better classify tumours in different prognostic categories, especially when diagnosing them in small bioptic specimens. NECs are all poorly differentiated, highly aggressive carcinomas, while MANECs can show different morphological features that are directly associated with different prognoses. Precursor lesions of such carcinomas are not entirely understood. In this review, the clinicopathological features of gastric NENs and related precursor lesions will be described to give the reader a comprehensive overview on this topic.

Epithelial dysplasia of the stomach with gastric immunophenotype shows features of biological aggressiveness

BACKGROUND

Gastric dysplasia is classified as adenomatous/type I (intestinal phenotype) and foveolar or pyloric/type II (gastric phenotype) according to morphological (architectural and cytological) features. The immunophenotypic classification of dysplasia, based on the expression of the mucins, CD10 and CDX2, recognizes the following immunophenotypes: intestinal (MUC2, CD10, and CDX2); gastric (MUC5AC and/or MUC6, absence of CD10, and absent or low expression of CDX2); hybrid (gastric and intestinal markers); and null.

METHODS

Sixty-six cases of nonpolypoid epithelial dysplasia of the stomach were classified according to morphological features (histotype and grade) and immunophenotype. Immunohistochemical staining was performed with antibodies against MUC2, MUC5AC, MUC6, CD10, CDX2, chromogranin, synaptophysin, Ki-67, and TP53. HER2 alterations were analyzed by immunohistochemistry and silver-enhanced in situ hybridization.

RESULTS

By conventional histology, dysplasia was classified as adenomatous/intestinal (n = 42; 64 %) and foveolar or pyloric/gastric (n = 24; 36 %) and graded as low grade (n = 37; 56 %) or high grade (n = 29; 44 %). Immunophenotypic classification showed intestinal (n = 22; 33.3 %), gastric (n = 25; 37.9 %), hybrid (n = 17; 25.8 %), or null (n = 2; 3.0 %) phenotypes. In 20 cases a coexistent intramucosal carcinoma was identified. The intestinal immunophenotype was shown to be significantly associated with low-grade dysplasia (p = 0.001), high expression of CDX2 (p = 0.015), TP53 (p = 0.034), synaptophysin (p = 0.003), and chromogranin (p < 0.0001); the gastric immunophenotype was significantly associated with high-grade dysplasia (p = 0.001), high Ki-67 proliferative index (p = 0.05), and coexistence of intramucosal carcinoma (p = 0.013). HER2 amplification was observed in 3 cases, typed as gastric or hybrid.

CONCLUSIONS

Epithelial nonpolypoid dysplasia of the stomach with gastric immunophenotype shows features of biological aggressiveness and may represent the putative precursor lesion in a pathway of gastric carcinogenesis originated de novo from the native gastric mucosa, leading to gastric-type adenocarcinoma.

An immunohistochemical study of canine spontaneous gastric polyps

Background

Gastric polyps (GP) are characterised by luminal overgrowths projecting above the plane of the mucosal surface that can be classified as non-neoplastic and neoplastic lesions. In humans, recent studies have drawn attention to the malignant potential of some of these lesions. However, gastric polyps are uncommon lesions in dogs.

Findings

In this study, the presence of Helicobacter spp., the cellular proliferative activity, potential phenotypic alterations, COX-2 and p53 expression in canine spontaneous gastric polyps were investigated. The expression of these molecules was also studied in normal canine gastric mucosa in order to gain further knowledge of the significance of their loss or overexpression in gastric lesions.

Conclusions

The normal expression of almost all the factors evaluated, along with the reduced proliferative activity is strongly suggestive that, in dogs, spontaneous gastric polyps are not only a rare finding but also of benign nature.

Virtual Slides

The virtual slide(s) for this article can be found here: http://www.diagnosticpathology.diagnomx.eu/vs/13000_2014_166

Gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms and related precursor lesions

Gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are a heterogeneous group of tumours showing different clinicopathological features and behaviour, implying a wide spectrum of therapeutic options. They are currently classified using the 2010 WHO classification of digestive neuroendocrine neoplasms into G1-neuroendocrine tumours (NETs), G2-NETs, neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) and mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinomas (MANECs). However, most gastric NENs are composed of ECL-cells (ECL-cell NETs) that can be preceded by ECL-cell hyperplastic and dysplastic lesions, whose oncologic potential has not yet been completely elucidated. ECL-cell NETs differ considerably in terms of prognosis depending on the proliferative status and clinicopathological background. The integration of both aspects in the diagnostic pathway may help to better classify tumours in different prognostic categories, especially when diagnosing them in small bioptic specimens. NECs are all poorly differentiated, highly aggressive carcinomas, while MANECs can show different morphological features that are directly associated with different prognoses. Precursor lesions of such carcinomas are not entirely understood. In this review, the clinicopathological features of gastric NENs and related precursor lesions will be described to give the reader a comprehensive overview on this topic.

Clinical validation of the gastrointestinal NET grading system: Ki67 index criteria of the WHO 2010 classification is appropriate to predict metastasis or recurrence

BACKGROUND

In the WHO 2010 classification, the neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are subdivided by their mitotic index or Ki67 index into either G1 or G2 NETs. Tumors with a Ki67 index of <2% are classified as G1 and those with 3-20% are classified as G2. However, the assessment of tumors with Ki67 index of greater than 2% and less than or equal to 3% is still unclear. To resolve the problem, we validated the Ki67 index criteria of gastrointestinal NETs of the WHO 2010 classification.

METHODS

The medical records of 45 patients who were pathologically diagnosed as having NET G1/G2 of the gastrointestinal tract were analyzed retrospectively. According to the WHO 2010 classification, Ki67 index were calculated. Computer-assisted cytometrical analysis of Ki67 immunoreactivity was performed using the WinRooF image processing software. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated to determine the best discriminating Ki67 index. To clarify the assessment of tumors with Ki67 index between 2-3%, the calculated cutoff of Ki67 index was evaluated using Fisher's exact test.

RESULTS

ROC curve analysis confirmed that 2.8% was the best Ki67 index cutoff value for predicting metastasis or recurrence. The sensitivity of the new Ki67 index cutoff was 42.9%, and the specificity was 86.8%.

CONCLUSIONS

Division of NETs into G1/G2 based on Ki67 index of 3% was appropriate to predict metastases or recurrences. The WHO grading system may be the most useful classification to predict metastases or recurrences.

VIRTUAL SLIDES

The virtual slide(s) for this article can be found here: http://www.diagnosticpathology.diagnomx.eu/vs/1553036118943799.