Phase dependent hypothalamic activation following trigeminal input in cluster headache

Unraveling the relationship between inflammation and cluster headache

Cluster headache (CH) is often referred to as the 'suicide headache.' Existing research suggests that the activation of the trigeminal-vascular system, increased sensitivity of nerve fibers, and the release and interaction of various neuropeptides and inflammatory mediators may contribute to neurogenic inflammation, which serves as a crucial pathophysiological basis for the development of CH. Additionally, some neuropeptides can modulate neuronal activity related to pain transmission and may increase pain perception by sensitizing central nerves. This review discusses the neuropeptides and inflammatory mediators associated with CH neuroinflammation, focusing on calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), inflammatory cytokines and related signaling pathways, nitric oxide (NO), pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating peptide 38 (PACAP-38), and vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP), incorporating both preclinical and clinical evidence to provide new insights into potential therapeutic targets for CH.

Cluster Headache and Migraine Shared and Unique Insights: Neurophysiological Implications, Neuroimaging, and Biomarkers: A Comprehensive Review

Migraine headache (MH) and cluster headache (CH) are debilitating primary headache disorders that impose a significant global burden. While they share certain clinical features, such as unilateral pain and autonomic dysfunction, their underlying pathophysiological mechanisms remain distinct. Advances in the understanding of neurophysiological features, such as neuroimaging and biomarker research, have provided critical insights into both their overlapping and divergent characteristics. Neurophysiological research has revealed differences in nociceptive processing, cortical excitability, and sensory integration, underscoring the complexity of these conditions. Neuroimaging studies reveal common activation patterns within pain-processing networks, including the trigeminal system and hypothalamus, while highlighting key differences, such as hypothalamic hyperactivity in CH and cortical alterations in MH. Additionally, biomarker research has identified shared elements, including elevated calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), yet distinct variations in its regulation and genetic predispositions. Genome-wide association studies have further elucidated the genetic architecture of these disorders, uncovering susceptibility loci that reinforces their unique yet occasionally intersecting genetic foundations. These multifield advancements not only enhance the understanding of MH and CH pathophysiology but also pave the way for improved diagnostic precision, personalized therapeutic strategies, and future research.

Potential hypothalamic mechanisms in trigeminal neuropathic pain: a comparative analysis with migraine and cluster headache

Trigeminal neuropathic pain (TNP), migraine, and cluster headache (CH) profoundly impact the quality of life and present significant clinical challenges due to their complex neurobiological underpinnings. This review delves into the pivotal role of the hypothalamus in the pathophysiology of these facial pain syndromes, highlighting its distinctive functions and potential as a primary target for research, diagnosis, and therapy. While the involvement of the hypothalamus in migraine and CH has been increasingly supported by imaging and clinical studies, the precise mechanisms of its role remain under active investigation. The role of the hypothalamus in TNP, in contrast, is less explored and represents a critical gap in our understanding. The hypothalamus's involvement varies significantly across these conditions, orchestrating a unique interplay of neural circuits and neurotransmitter systems that underlie the distinct characteristics of each pain type. We have explored advanced neuromodulation techniques, such as deep brain stimulation (DBS) and optogenetics, which show promise in targeting hypothalamic dysfunction to alleviate pain symptoms. Furthermore, we discuss the neuroplastic changes within the hypothalamus that contribute to the chronicity of these pains and the implications of these findings for developing targeted therapies. By offering a comprehensive examination of the hypothalamus's roles, this paper aims to bridge existing knowledge gaps and propel forward the understanding and management of facial neuralgias, underscoring the hypothalamus's critical position in future neurological research.

Transient side shift of cluster headache attacks after unilateral greater occipital nerve injection

Attacks of cluster headache (CH) are usually side-locked in most, but not all, patients. In a few patients, the side may alternate between or, rarely, within cluster episodes. We observed seven cases in whom the side of CH attacks temporarily shifted immediately or shortly after unilateral injection of the greater occipital nerve (GON) with corticosteroids. In five patients with previously side-locked CH attacks and in two patients with previously side-alternating CH attacks, a side shift for several weeks occurred immediately (N = 6) or shortly (N = 1) after GON injection. We concluded that unilateral GON injections might cause a transient side shift of CH attacks through inhibition of the ipsilateral hypothalamic attack generator causing relative overactivity of the contralateral side. The potential benefit of bilateral GON injection in patients who experienced a side shift after unilateral injection should be formally investigated.

Management of cluster headache: Treatments and their mechanisms

BACKGROUND

The management of cluster headache is similar to that of other primary headache disorders and can be broadly divided into acute and preventive treatments. Acute treatments for cluster headache are primarily delivered via rapid, non-oral routes (such as inhalation, nasal, or subcutaneous) while preventives include a variety of unrelated treatments such as corticosteroids, verapamil, and galcanezumab. Neuromodulation is becoming an increasingly popular option, both non-invasively such as vagus nerve stimulation when medical treatment is contraindicated or side effects are intolerable, and invasively such as occipital nerve stimulation when medical treatment is ineffective. Clinically, this collection of treatment types provides a range of options for the informed clinician. Scientifically, this collection provides important insights into disease mechanisms.

METHODS

Two authors performed independent narrative reviews of the literature on guideline recommendations, clinical trials, real-world data, and mechanistic studies.

RESULTS

Cluster headache is treated with acute treatments, bridge treatments, and preventive treatments. Common first-line treatments include subcutaneous sumatriptan and high-flow oxygen as acute treatments, corticosteroids (oral or suboccipital injections) as bridge treatments, and verapamil as a preventive treatment. Some newer acute (non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation) and preventive (galcanezumab) treatments have excellent clinical trial data for episodic cluster headache, while other newer treatments (occipital nerve stimulation) have been specifically tested in treatment-refractory chronic cluster headache. Most treatments are suspected to act on the trigeminovascular system, the autonomic system, or the hypothalamus.

CONCLUSIONS

The first-line treatments have not changed in recent years, but new treatments have provided additional options for patients.

Cluster headache and kynurenines

BACKGROUND

The glutamatergic neurotransmission has important role in the pathomechanism of primary headache disorders. The kynurenine metabolites derived from catabolism of tryptophan (Trp) have significant involvement not only in glutamatergic processes, but also in the neuroinflammation, the oxidative stress and the mitochondrial dysfunctions. Previously we identified a depressed peripheral Trp metabolism in interictal period of episodic migraineurs, which prompted us to examine this pathway in patients with episodic cluster headache (CH) as well. Our aims were to compare the concentrations of compounds both in headache-free and attack periods, and to find correlations between Trp metabolism and the clinical features of CH. Levels of 11 molecules were determined in peripheral blood plasma of healthy controls (n = 22) and interbout/ictal periods of CH patients (n = 24) by neurochemical measurements.

FINDINGS

Significantly decreased L-kynurenine (KYN, p < 0.01), while increased quinolinic acid (QUINA, p < 0.005) plasma concentrations were detected in the interbout period of CH patients compared to healthy subjects. The levels of KYN are further reduced during the ictal period compared to the controls (p < 0.006). There was a moderate, negative correlation between disease duration and interbout QUINA levels (p < 0.048, R =  - 0.459); and between the total number of CH attacks experienced during the lifetime of patients and the interbout KYN concentrations (p < 0.024, R =  - 0.516). Linear regression models revealed negative associations between age and levels of Trp, kynurenic acid, 3-hdyroxyanthranilic acid and QUINA in healthy control subjects, as well as between age and ictal level of anthranilic acid.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results refer to a specifically altered Trp metabolism in CH patients. The onset of metabolic imbalance can be attributed to the interbout period, where the decreased KYN level is unable to perform its protective functions, while the concentration of QUINA, as a toxic compound, increases. These processes can trigger CH attacks, which may be associated with glutamate excess induced neurotoxicity, neuroinflammation and oxidative stress. Further studies are needed to elucidate the exact functions of these molecular alterations that can contribute to identify new, potential biomarkers in the therapy of CH.

Primary headache disorders: From pathophysiology to neurostimulation therapies

Primary headache disorders including migraine, cluster headache, and tension-type headache are among the most common disabling diseases worldwide. The unclear pathogenesis of primary headache disorders has led to high rates of misdiagnosis and limited available treatment options. In this review, we have summarized the pathophysiological factors for a better understanding of primary headache disorders. Advances in functional neuroimaging, genetics, neurophysiology have indicated that cortical hyperexcitability, regional brain dysfunction, central sensitization and neuroplasticity changes play vital roles in the development of primary headache disorders. Moreover, we have also discussed a series of neurostimulation approaches with their stimulation mechanism, safety and efficacy for prevention and treatment of primary headache disorders. Noninvasive or implantable neurostimulation techniques show great promise for treating refractory primary headache disorders.

Functional magnetic resonance imaging of headache: Issues, best-practices, and new directions, a narrative review

OBJECTIVE

To ensure readers are informed consumers of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) research in headache, to outline ongoing challenges in this area of research, and to describe potential considerations when asked to collaborate on fMRI research in headache, as well as to suggest future directions for improvement in the field.

BACKGROUND

Functional MRI has played a key role in understanding headache pathophysiology, and mapping networks involved with headache-related brain activity have the potential to identify intervention targets. Some investigators have also begun to explore its use for diagnosis.

METHODS/RESULTS

The manuscript is a narrative review of the current best practices in fMRI in headache research, including guidelines on transparency and reproducibility. It also contains an outline of the fundamentals of MRI theory, task-related study design, resting-state functional connectivity, relevant statistics and power analysis, image preprocessing, and other considerations essential to the field.

CONCLUSION

Best practices to increase reproducibility include methods transparency, eliminating error, using a priori hypotheses and power calculations, using standardized instruments and diagnostic criteria, and developing large-scale, publicly available datasets.

Debate: Are cluster headache and migraine distinct headache disorders?

Cluster headache and migraine are regarded as distinct primary headaches. While cluster headache and migraine differ in multiple aspects such as gender-related and headache specific features (e.g., attack duration and frequency), both show clinical similarities in trigger factors (e.g., alcohol) and treatment response (e.g., triptans). Here, we review the similarities and differences in anatomy and pathophysiology that underlie cluster headache and migraine, discuss whether cluster headache and migraine should indeed be considered as two distinct primary headaches, and propose recommendations for future studies. Video recording of the debate held at the 1st International Conference on Advances in Migraine Sciences (ICAMS 2022, Copenhagen, Denmark) is available at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uUimmnDVTTE .

CGRP-Targeted Therapy for Episodic and Chronic Cluster Headache

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Chronic cluster headache (CH) substantially affects patients' quality of life, and treatment remains challenging. The current article reviewed controlled studies for new treatment options targeting calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) or its receptors in CH and discussed the current gaps and future directions for the treatment of chronic CH.

RECENT FINDINGS

Two anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies (i.e., galcanezumab and fremanezumab) completed randomized-control trials for efficacy for the preventive treatment of episodic and chronic CH. Galcanezumab was effective for preventing episodic CH but not chronic CH. Fremanezumab was ineffective in preventing episodic and chronic CH. Studies for other anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies and CGRP antagonists are still pending for results. There are no randomized controlled trials for CGRP-targeted therapies that showed efficacy for chronic CH prevention. The different responses to galcanezumab between episodic and chronic CH may be due to the study design, i.e., the allowance of concomitant preventive therapies in the chronic CH study but not in the episodic CH study. Another reason for the discrepancies is the different roles and sensitivity of CGRP in chronic CH.

Cluster headache: a single tertiary center study

OBJECT

The characteristics of cluster headache (CH) patients in many countries and the diagnostic and therapeutic approach have been described in several publications, but so far no clinical data have been published from Turkey.

MATERIAL METHODS

This is a cross-sectional retrospective study that includes all patients who were diagnosed with CH and referred to our headache clinic, Dokuz Eylül University Faculty of Medicine, Neurology Department from 1991 to January 2018.

RESULTS

We included 114 patients (24 females and 90 males) in our study. The mean age at onset was 31.68 ± 12.72 (range 13-68). Eighty-six (78.18%) patients had episodic cluster headache (ECH) and 24 (21.82%) patients had chronic cluster headache (CCH). The age at onset was significantly higher in the patients with CCH than with ECH (p = 0.002). The most common location was orbitotemporal for both genders. The most common accompanying symptoms were lacrimation (80.73%). The male:female ratio in all patients was 3:7, 3.8:1 in those with CCH and 4:1 in those with ECH. Eighty-nine (87.25%) patients had prophylactic treatment and 60 of them received verapamil.

CONCLUSION

In our study, some clinical features of our patients were similar to those of Europe and America or the Asian countries and some of them not. There are regional differences in cluster headache patients. With more awareness of cluster headache and research from many countries, clinical differences can be revealed more objectively in the future.

Gene polymorphism association studies in cluster headache: A field synopsis and systematic meta-analyses

BACKGROUND

A plethora of studies have attempted to identify genetic determinants of disease susceptibility and treatment response of patients with cluster headache (CH), but results are often conflicting, and no comprehensive overview with a quantitative summary of the evidence in this field is available.

METHODS

A systematic search of relevant publications was performed without any language restrictions on PubMed, Web of Knowledge, Cochrane Library, and OpenGrey, up to December 2020. A standardized data extraction form was used to collect relevant data from each included study. Meta-analyses were conducted for gene polymorphisms investigated in at least two studies and the Bayesian false discovery probability (BFDP) test was applied to the pooled odds ratios (ORs) to assess the credibility of the observed associations.

RESULTS

Among the 27 articles identified by the systematic review, 17 studies evaluating 12 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were included in the quantitative data analysis. The pooled results showed no significant association with CH risk of 10 SNPs, including five SNPs of HCRTR2 (rs2653349, rs2653342, rs3122156, rs10498801, and rs3800539), two SNPs of ADH4 (rs1800759 and rs1126671), CLOCK rs1801260, and two SNPs (rs1006417 and ADCYAP1R1 rs12668955) previously identified by a genome-wide association study (GWAS). Conversely, the pooled results revealed the association of the HCRTR2 rs9357855 A allele with a higher risk of CH (A vs. G, OR: 1.33, 95% CI: 1.04-1.72, p = 0.026), and of GNB3 rs5443 with a higher response rate of patients with CH to triptan drugs (CT+TT vs. CC, OR: 1.96, 95% CI: 1.04-3.72, p = 0.038). However, assuming a prior probability of 0.001, the respective BFDP values being higher than 0.8 (BFDP_rs9357855  = 0.998; BFDP_rs5443  = 0.998) revealed lack of noteworthy results.

CONCLUSIONS

Well-designed GWASs and large replication studies are still needed to identify reliable genetic variants of disease susceptibility and treatment response of patients with CH.

The molecular clock gene cryptochrome 1 (CRY1) and its role in cluster headache

Background

Cluster headache is a severe primary headache disorder commonly featuring a strikingly distinct circadian attack pattern. Therefore, the circadian system has been suggested to play a crucial role in the pathophysiology of cluster headache. Cryptochromes are key components of the molecular clock generating circadian rhythms and have previously been shown to be associated with several psychiatric disorders, including seasonal affective disorder, bipolar disorder, and depression.

Methods

In this case-control study, we investigated the role of cryptochrome (CRY) genes in cluster headache by screening 628 cluster headache patients and 681 controls from Sweden for four known genetic variants in the CRY1 (rs2287161 and rs8192440) and CRY2 (rs10838524 and rs1554338) genes. In addition, we analyzed CRY1 gene expression in primary fibroblast cell lines from eleven patients and ten controls.

Results

The exonic CRY1 variant rs8192440 was associated with cluster headache on allelic level (p=0.02) and this association was even more pronounced in a subgroup of patients with reported diurnal rhythmicity of attacks (p=0.002). We found a small significant difference in CRY1 gene expression between cluster headache patients and control individuals (p=0.04), but we could not identify an effect of the associated variant rs8192440 on CRY1 expression.

Conclusions

We discovered a disease-associated variant in the CRY1 gene and slightly increased CRY1 gene expression in tissue from cluster headache patients, strengthening the hypothesis of circadian dysregulation in cluster headache. How this gene variant may contribute to the pathophysiology of the disease remains subject to further studies.

Altered trigeminal pain processing on brainstem level in persistent idiopathic facial pain

ABSTRACT

Persistent idiopathic facial pain (PIFP) is a poorly understood chronic pain syndrome of the face, formerly known as atypical facial pain. It is characterized by a constant painful sensation without neurological abnormalities and without clinically objectifiable cause. Similarities to neuropathic pain conditions have been discussed and are currently thought to be relevant for the pathophysiology of this disease. In this study, we aim to characterize the trigeminal pain processing in PIFP using functional magnetic resonance imaging of the brainstem. Twenty-five patients suffering from PIFP and 25 healthy controls underwent a standardized and well-established paradigm of painful stimulation of the trigeminal nerve using gaseous ammonia. Functional images were acquired within a 3T magnetic resonance imaging scanner using an optimized protocol for high-resolution echo planar brainstem imaging. Patients with PIFP show exclusively a stronger activation to painful stimulation in the spinal trigeminal nucleus when contrasted against healthy controls. Our data suggest that abnormal central pain processing plays a role in the pathophysiology of PIFP. An integration of these findings into neuropathic pain models might help to gain a better general understanding of the pathophysiology of PIFP.

Exploring the Connection Between Sleep and Cluster Headache: A Narrative Review

Cluster headache is a rare form of headache associated with sleep and even speculated to be a manifestation of a sleep disorder rather than a primary headache. Cluster headache exhibits both circadian and circannual rhythmicity. While attacks often occur during sleep, the implication that cluster headaches might be involved with rapid eye movement (REM) sleep phases has neither been fully established nor refuted. The regulatory mechanisms governing sleep including hypothalamic activity and the autonomic nervous system response may play a role. Hypothalamic activation has been observed in cluster headache patients during positron emission tomography testing, but only during attacks. While sleep apnea is associated with morning headaches in general, the link between sleep-disordered respiration and cluster headache remains elusive. Hypoarousal during sleep and periods of hypoxia are associated with cluster headache, the latter likely involving inflammatory processes rather than apnea. Further study is needed, as cluster headaches represent a serious primary cephalgia that is incompletely understood.