CGRP induces migraine-like symptoms in mice during both the active and inactive phases

Combined effects of cannabidiol and Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol alleviate migraine-like symptoms in mice

BACKGROUND

The therapeutic use of cannabidiol (CBD) and Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) to treat migraine has been understudied. Using three mouse models, we examined the impact of CBD and THC on migraine-relevant behaviors triggered by: 1) calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), 2) sodium nitroprusside (SNP), and 3) cortical spreading depolarization (CSD).

METHODS

Both male and female CD1 mice were treated with CBD (100 mg/kg) or THC (1 mg/kg) alone or in combinations of CBD (1, 30 or 100 mg/kg) and THC (1 mg/kg) prior to injection of CGRP or SNP. The mice were assessed for light aversion (photophobia), squint (non-evoked pain), and periorbital tactile hypersensitivity, as well as possible adverse effects. In a separate set of experiments, CSD events were optogenetically induced in familial hemiplegic migraine 1 (FHM1) mutant and wildtype littermates (WT) mice (C57BL/6 background), followed by grimace and motor assessments with and without combinations of CBD (30 or 100 mg/kg) and THC (1 mg/kg).

RESULTS

In CD1 mice, a 100:1 CBD:THC combination mitigated light aversion induced by CGRP and SNP in males and females. Rescue of CGRP- and SNP-induced squint was observed only in male mice with 100:1 CBD:THC. None of the treatments rescued periorbital tactile hypersensitivity in either sex. In FHM1 mutant and WT mice, the 100:1 CBD:THC ratio did not affect CSD characteristics but did reduce CSD-induced grimace features (i.e., head pain mimic). No adverse effects of any of the cannabinoid treatments were observed using cognitive, emotional, or motor tests.

CONCLUSIONS

A 100:1 ratio of CBD:THC has a beneficial effect on some of the most bothersome migraine-related symptoms in three mouse models. Our findings support a potential therapeutic efficacy of combined CBD and THC treatments.

Neuronal-immune axis alters pain and sensory afferent damage during dental pulp injury

ABSTRACT

Dental pulp tissue is densely innervated by afferent fibers of the trigeminal ganglion. When bacteria cause dental decay near the pulpal tissue, a strong neuronal and immune response occurs, creating pulpitis, which is associated with severe pain and pulp tissue damage. Neuroimmune interactions have the potential to modulate both the pain and pathological outcome of pulpitis. We first investigated the role of the neuropeptide calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), released from peptidergic sensory afferents, in dental pain and immune responses by using Calca knockout (Calca -/- ) and wild-type (Calca +/+ ) mice, in a model of pulpitis by creating a mechanical exposure of the dental pulp horn. We found that the neuropeptide CGRP, facilitated the recruitment of myeloid cells into the pulp while also increasing spontaneous pain-like behavior 20% to 25% at an early time point. Moreover, when we depleted neutrophils and monocytes, we found that there was 20% to 30% more sensory afferent loss and increased presence of bacteria in deeper parts of the tissue, whereas there was a significant reduction in mechanical pain response scores compared with the control group at a later time point. Overall, we showed that there is a crosstalk between peptidergic neurons and neutrophils in the pulp, modulating the pain and inflammatory outcomes of the disease.

A narrative review of the calcitonin peptide family and associated receptors as migraine targets: Calcitonin gene-related peptide and beyond

OBJECTIVE

To summarize the pharmacology of the calcitonin peptide family of receptors and explore their relationship to migraine and current migraine therapies.

BACKGROUND

Therapeutics that dampen calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) signaling are now in clinical use to prevent or treat migraine. However, CGRP belongs to a broader peptide family, including the peptides amylin and adrenomedullin. Receptors for this family are complex, displaying overlapping pharmacologic profiles. Despite the focus on CGRP and the CGRP receptor in migraine research, recent evidence implicates related peptides and receptors in migraine.

METHODS

This narrative review summarizes literature encompassing the current pharmacologic understanding of the calcitonin peptide family, and the evidence that links specific members of this family to migraine and migraine-like behaviors.

RESULTS

Recent work links amylin and adrenomedullin to migraine-like behavior in rodent models and migraine-like attacks in individuals with migraine. We collate novel information that suggests females may be more sensitive to amylin and CGRP in the context of migraine-like behaviors. We report that drugs designed to antagonize the canonical CGRP receptor also antagonize a second CGRP-responsive receptor and speculate as to whether this influences therapeutic efficacy. We also discuss the specificity of current drugs with regards to CGRP isoforms and how this may influence therapeutic profiles. Lastly, we emphasize that receptors related to, but distinct from, the canonical CGRP receptor may represent underappreciated and novel drug targets.

CONCLUSION

Multiple peptides within the calcitonin family have been linked to migraine. The current focus on CGRP and its canonical receptor may be obscuring pathways to further therapeutics. Drug discovery schemes that take a wider view of the receptor family may lead to the development of new anti-migraine drugs with favorable clinical profiles. We also propose that understanding these related peptides and receptors may improve our interpretation regarding the mechanism of action of current drugs.

Intranasal calcitonin gene-related peptide administration impairs fear memory retention in mice through the PKD/p-HDAC5/Npas4 pathway

The calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) suppresses fear memory retention in mice. Although intracerebroventricular administration of CGRP alters the fear memory processes, making it a promising therapeutic strategy for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), direct brain injection into patients is not practical. Therefore, we propose that intranasal application may be an effective way to deliver CGRP to the brain. This study tested whether CGRP nasal administration exerts the same effect as intracerebroventricular administration using C57BL6J mice. The amount of CGRP in the cerebrospinal fluid and hippocampus 30 min after nasal administration of CGRP was significantly higher when compared with saline. Intranasal CGRP also elicited photophobic behaviors similar to intracerebroventricular injection. Moreover, intranasal CGRP decreased fear memory retention but did not affect reactivation and extinction of fear memory. We found intranasal CGRP significantly increased the expression of protein kinase D (PKD), phosphorylated histone deacetylase 5 (p-HDAC5) and neuronal PAS domain protein 4 (Npas4) in the hippocampus. CGRP-mediated impairment of fear memory and Npas4 expression increases were attenuated significantly by the CGRP receptor antagonist BIBN4096. Together, our data demonstrate that intranasal CGRP delivery activates the PKD/p-HDAC5/Npas4 pathway, decreases fear memory retention.