Alignment-free genome comparison enables accurate geographic sourcing of white oak DNA

Zeta diversity patterns in metabarcoded lotic algal assemblages as a tool for bioassessment

Assessments of the ecological health of algal assemblages in streams typically focus on measures of their local diversity and classify individuals by morphotaxonomy. Such assemblages are often connected through various ecological processes, such as dispersal, and may be more accurately assessed as components of regional-, rather than local-scale assemblages. With recent declines in the costs of sequencing and computation, it has also become increasingly feasible to use metabarcoding to more accurately classify algal species and perform regional-scale bioassessments. Recently, zeta diversity has been explored as a novel method of constructing regional bioassessments for groups of streams. Here, we model the use of zeta diversity to investigate whether stream health can be determined by the landscape diversity of algal assemblages. We also compare the use of DNA metabarcoding and morphotaxonomy classifications in these zeta diversity-based bioassessments of regional stream health. From 96 stream samples in California, we used various orders of zeta diversity to construct models of biotic integrity for multiple assemblages of diatoms, as well as hybrid assemblages of diatoms in combination with soft-bodied algae, using taxonomy data generated with both DNA sequencing as well as traditional morphotaxonomic approaches. We compared our ability to evaluate the ecological health of streams with the performance of multiple algal indices of biological condition. Our zeta diversity-based models of regional biotic integrity were more strongly correlated with existing indices for algal assemblages classified using metabarcoding compared to morphotaxonomy. Metabarcoding for diatoms and hybrid algal assemblages involved rbcL and 18S V9 primers, respectively. Importantly, we also found that these algal assemblages, independent of the classification method, are more likely to be assembled under a process of niche differentiation rather than stochastically. Taken together, these results suggest the potential for zeta diversity patterns of algal assemblages classified using metabarcoding to inform stream bioassessments.

AC-PCoA: Adjustment for confounding factors using principal coordinate analysis

Confounding factors exist widely in various biological data owing to technical variations, population structures and experimental conditions. Such factors may mask the true signals and lead to spurious associations in the respective biological data, making it necessary to adjust confounding factors accordingly. However, existing confounder correction methods were mainly developed based on the original data or the pairwise Euclidean distance, either one of which is inadequate for analyzing different types of data, such as sequencing data.

In this work, we proposed a method called Adjustment for Confounding factors using Principal Coordinate Analysis, or AC-PCoA, which reduces data dimension and extracts the information from different distance measures using principal coordinate analysis, and adjusts confounding factors across multiple datasets by minimizing the associations between lower-dimensional representations and confounding variables. Application of the proposed method was further extended to classification and prediction. We demonstrated the efficacy of AC-PCoA on three simulated datasets and five real datasets. Compared to the existing methods, AC-PCoA shows better results in visualization, statistical testing, clustering, and classification.

With today’s unprecedented amount of data, researchers are challenged by the need to enhance meaningful signals without the interference of unwanted confounders hidden inside the data. Data visualization is an important step toward exploring and explaining data in order to intuitively identify the dominant patterns. Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA), as a visualization tool, allows flexible ways to define pairwise distances and project the samples into lower dimensions without changing the distances. However, when visualizing large-scale biological datasets, the true patterns are often hindered by unwanted confounding variations, either biologically or technically in origin. To eliminate these confounding factors and recover underlying signals, we proposed a method called Adjustment for Confounding factors using Principal Coordinate Analysis, or AC-PCoA, and showed that it significantly outperforms existing methods in visualization through three simulation studies and five real datasets. We further showed that the low-dimensional representations given by AC-PCoA provide promising results in statistical testing, clustering, and classification as well.

Afann: bias adjustment for alignment-free sequence comparison based on sequencing data using neural network regression

Alignment-free methods, more time and memory efficient than alignment-based methods, have been widely used for comparing genome sequences or raw sequencing samples without assembly. However, in this study, we show that alignment-free dissimilarity calculated based on sequencing samples can be overestimated compared with the dissimilarity calculated based on their genomes, and this bias can significantly decrease the performance of the alignment-free analysis. Here, we introduce a new alignment-free tool, Alignment-Free methods Adjusted by Neural Network (Afann) that successfully adjusts this bias and achieves excellent performance on various independent datasets. Afann is freely available at https://github.com/GeniusTang/Afann.

Reads Binning Improves Alignment-Free Metagenome Comparison

Comparing metagenomic samples is a critical step in understanding the relationships among microbial communities. Recently, next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies have produced a massive amount of short reads data for microbial communities from different environments. The assembly of these short reads can, however, be time-consuming and challenging. In addition, alignment-based methods for metagenome comparison are limited by incomplete genome and/or pathway databases. In contrast, alignment-free methods for metagenome comparison do not depend on the completeness of genome or pathway databases. Still, the existing alignment-free methods,d 2 S andd 2 * , which model k-tuple patterns using only one Markov chain for each sample, neglect the heterogeneity within metagenomic data wherein potentially thousands of types of microorganisms are sequenced. To address this imperfection ind 2 S andd 2 * , we organized NGS sequences into different reads bins and constructed several corresponding Markov models. Next, we modified the definition of our previous alignment-free methods,d 2 S andd 2 * , to make them more compatible with a scheme of analysis which uses the proposed reads bins. We then used two simulated and three real metagenomic datasets to test the effect of the k-tuple size and Markov orders of background sequences on the performance of these de novo alignment-free methods. For dependable comparison of metagenomic samples, our newly developed alignment-free methods with reads binning outperformed alignment-free methods without reads binning in detecting the relationship among microbial communities, including whether they form groups or change according to some environmental gradients.