Effects of dynamic individualized PEEP guided by driving pressure in laparoscopic surgery on postoperative atelectasis in elderly patients: a prospective randomized controlled trial

Effects of individualized PEEP on pulmonary function, cerebral blood flow and postoperative cognitive function in patients undergoing laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effects of individualized PEEP on pulmonary function, cerebral blood flow, and postoperative cognitive function in patients undergoing laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer.

METHODS

100 patients who underwent laparoscopic radical rectal cancer surgery at our hospital between August 2021 and May 2023 were randomized into two groups: the DP group (optimal PEEP group oriented to driving pressure) and the Cdyn group (optimal PEEP group oriented to pulmonary compliance). Anesthesia was induced in both groups with 0.3 mg/kg of remizolam + 0.15 mg/kg of CIS atracurium + 0.5 ug/kg of sufentanil. Lung ultrasound score (LUS), peak and plateau airway pressures (PEAK, PLAT), oxygenation index (OI), driving pressure (DP), and pulmonary dynamic compliance (Cdyn) were measured at different time points. Cerebral blood flow and cognitive function were also assessed. T0: before induction of anesthesia; T1: before postoperative extubation of the tracheal tube; T2: 1 h after extubation; T3: on the third postoperative day; T4: 5 min after determining the optimal PEEP; T5: 1 h after the establishment of pneumoperitoneum; T6: 2 h after the establishment of the pneumoperitoneum; T7: 20 min at the end of pneumoperitoneum.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in general information between the two groups, P > 0.05. Compared with the DP group, the Cdyn group had lower LUS at T3, higher PEAK at T5, T6, and T7, lower PLAT and OI at T6 and T7, lower DP at T4, T6, and T7, and lower Cdyn at T6 and T7, P < 0.05. The Cdyn group had lower cerebral blood flow at T4 and T6, P < 0.05. The Cdyn group had higher cognitive function at stage T3 as assessed by MMSE, P < 0.05.

CONCLUSION

PEEP guided by lung compliance improves pulmonary function, cerebral blood flow, and cognitive function, offering clinical benefits.

Effect of individualized end-inspiratory pause guided by driving pressure on respiratory mechanics during prone spinal surgery: a randomized controlled trial

Purpose

The prone position is commonly used in spinal surgery, but it can lead to decreased lung compliance and increased airway pressure. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of individualized end-inspiratory pause guided by driving pressure on respiratory mechanics in patients undergoing prone spinal surgery.

Methods

A randomized controlled trial was conducted from August to October 2023. Patients scheduled for elective prone spinal surgery were randomly assigned to either a study group, receiving individualized end-inspiratory pause, or a control group, receiving a fixed end-inspiratory pause (10% of total inspiratory time). Mechanical ventilation parameters, including tidal volume, plateau pressure, driving pressure, and peak pressure, were recorded at different time points. Arterial blood gases were collected at baseline and at specified intervals.

Results

Data from 36 subjects (18 in each group) were included in the final analysis. The study group exhibited a significant increase in respiratory system compliance (P < 0.05) and improved intraoperative oxygenation (P < 0.05). In addition, the individualized end-inspiratory pause significantly decreased plateau pressure (P < 0.05) and driving pressure (P < 0.05) compared to the control group.

Conclusion

The individualized end-inspiratory pause guided by driving pressure effectively optimized pulmonary compliance and improved oxygenation during prone spinal surgery. These findings suggest that this ventilation strategy may enhance respiratory mechanics and reduce the risk of postoperative pulmonary complications.

Association between thoracic epidural anesthesia and driving pressure in adult patients undergoing elective major upper abdominal surgery: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Thoracic epidural anesthesia (TEA) is associated with a knowledge gap regarding its mechanisms in lung protection and reduction of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs). Driving pressure (ΔP), an alternative indicator of alveolar strain, is closely linked to reduced PPCs with lower ΔP values. We aim to investigate whether TEA contributes to lung protection by lowering ΔP during mechanical ventilation.

METHODS

In this prospective, randomized, patient and evaluator-blinded parallel study, adult patients scheduled for elective major upper abdominal surgery were assigned to either the TEA group with combined thoracic epidural anesthesia and general anesthesia (TEA-GA) (n = 30) or the control group with only general anesthesia (GA) (n = 30).

MEASUREMENTS

The primary outcome was the minimum ΔP determined based on positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) after intubation. Secondary outcomes included the incidence of PPCs within seven days, the minimum ΔP at various time points, blood gas analysis, intensive care unit (ICU) admission rates, length of hospital stay, and 30-day mortality rate.

RESULTS

The TEA group had a significantly lower minimum ΔP titrated based on PEEP compared to the control group (11.23 ± 2.19 cmH2O vs. 12.67 ± 2.70 cmH2O; P = 0.028). Multivariate linear regression analysis showed that intraoperative TEA application (compared with its absence; unstandardized beta coefficient (B) = -1.289; P = 0.008) significantly correlated with ΔP. The incidence of PPCs did not differ significantly between the two groups (8 of 30 [26.7%] vs. 12 of 30 [40%]; P = 0.273), but the incidence of atelectasis in the TEA group was significantly lower than in the control group (5 of 30 [16.7%] vs. 12 of 30 [40.7%]; P = 0.012). Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that ΔP was the only variable significantly associated with PPCs (Adjusted Odds Ratio [OR] = 2.190; 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 1.300 to 3.689; P = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

Compared to GA, TEA-GA can reduce intraoperative ΔP in patients undergoing major upper abdominal surgery, especially those undergoing laparoscopic surgery. However, compared to GA combined with ΔP-guided ventilation, TEA-GA combined with ΔP-guided ventilation does not reduce the risk of PPCs. There was no significant difference in the total use of various vasoactive drugs between the two groups.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (registration number ChiCTR2300068778 date of registration February 28, 2023).

Effect of ultrasound-guided individualized positive end-expiratory pressure on the severity of postoperative atelectasis in elderly patients: a randomized controlled study

Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) are common in patients undergoing general anesthesia, with atelectasis being a key contributor that increases postoperative mortality and prolongs hospitalization. Our research hypothesis is that ultrasound-guided individualized PEEP titration can reduce postoperative atelectasis. This single-center randomized controlled trial recruited elderly patients for laparoscopic surgery. Patients were randomly assigned to two group: the study group (individualized PEEP groups, PEEP Ind group) and the control group (Fixed PEEP group, PEEP 5 group). All patients in these two groups received volume-controlled ventilation during general anesthesia. Patients in the study group were given ultrasound-guided PEEP, while those in the control group were given a fixed 5 cmH2O PEEP. Bedside ultrasound assessed lung ventilation. The primary outcome was the severity of atelectasis within seven days post-surgery. Eighty-nine patients scheduled for elective laparoscopic radical surgery for colorectal cancer were enrolled in our study. Lung ultrasound scores (LUSs) in the study group during postoperative seven days was significantly decreased compared with that in the control group (P < 0.05). The severity of postoperative atelectasis in the study group was significantly improved. The incidence of PPCs during postoperative 7 days in the study group was significantly less than that in the control group (48.6% vs. 77.8%; RR = 0.625; CI = 0.430-0.909; P = 0.01). In elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic radical resection, lung ultrasound-guided individualized PEEP can alleviate the severity of postoperative atelectasis.Clinical trial number and registry URL: No. ChiCTR2200062979 ( https://www.chictr.org.cn ).

Individualised Positive End-Expiratory Pressure Settings Reduce the Incidence of Postoperative Pulmonary Complications: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Progressive atelectasis regularly occurs during general anaesthesia; hence, positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is often applied. Individualised PEEP titration may reduce the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) and improve oxygenation as compared to fixed PEEP settings; however, evidence is lacking. Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42021282228). A systematic search in four databases (MEDLINE Via PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and Web of Science) was performed on 14 October 2021 and updated on 26 April 2024. We searched for randomised controlled trials comparing the effects of individually titrated versus fixed PEEP strategies during abdominal surgeries. The primary endpoint was the incidence of PPCs. The secondary endpoints included the PaO2/FiO2 at the end of surgery, individually set PEEP value, vasopressor requirements, and respiratory mechanics. Results: We identified 30 trials (2602 patients). The incidence of PPCs was significantly lower among patients in the individualised group (RR = 0.70, CI: 0.58-0.84). A significantly higher PaO2/FiO2 ratio was found in the individualised group as compared to controls at the end of the surgery (MD = 55.99 mmHg, 95% CI: 31.78-80.21). Individual PEEP was significantly higher as compared to conventional settings (MD = 6.27 cm H2O, CI: 4.30-8.23). Fewer patients in the control group needed vasopressor support; however, this result was non-significant. Lung-function-related outcomes showed better respiratory mechanics in the individualised group (Cstat: MD = 11.92 cm H2O 95% CI: 6.40-17.45). Conclusions: Our results show that individually titrated PEEP results in fewer PPCs and better oxygenation in patients undergoing abdominal surgery.

Methods for determining optimal positive end-expiratory pressure in patients undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation: a scoping review

PURPOSE

There is significant variability in the application of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) in patients undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation. There are numerous studies assessing methods of determining optimal PEEP, but many methods, patient populations, and study settings lack high-quality evidence. Guidelines make no recommendations about the use of a specific method because of equipoise and lack of high-quality evidence. We conducted a scoping review to determine which methods of determining optimal PEEP have been studied and what gaps exist in the literature.

SOURCE

We searched five databases for primary research reports studying methods of determining optimal PEEP among adults undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation. Data abstracted consisted of the titration method, setting, study design, population, and outcomes.

PRINCIPLE FINDINGS

Two hundred and seventy-one studies with 17,205 patients met the inclusion criteria, including 73 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with 10,733 patients. We identified 22 methods. Eleven were studied with an RCT. Studies enrolled participants within an intensive care unit (ICU) (216/271, 80%) or operating room (55/271, 20%). Most ICU studies enrolled patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (162/216, 75%). The three most studied methods were compliance (73 studies, 29 RCTs), imaging-based methods (65 studies, 11 RCTs), and use of PEEP-FIO2 tables (52 studies, 20 RCTs). Among ICU RCTs, the most common primary outcomes were mortality or oxygenation. Few RCTs assessed feasibility of different methods (n = 3). The strengths and limitations of each method are discussed.

CONCLUSION

Numerous methods of determining optimal PEEP have been evaluated; however, notable gaps remain in the evidence supporting their use. These include specific populations (normal lungs, patients weaning from mechanical ventilation) and using alternate outcomes (ventilator-free days and feasibility) and they present significant opportunities for future study.

STUDY REGISTRATION

Open Science Framework ( https://osf.io/atzqc ); first posted, 19 July 2022.

Driving pressure: A useful tool for reducing postoperative pulmonary complications

The operating room is a unique environment where surgery exposes patients to non-physiological changes that can compromise lung mechanics. Therefore, raising clinicians' awareness of the potential risk of ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI) is mandatory. Driving pressure is a useful tool for reducing lung complications in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome and those undergoing elective surgery. Driving pressure has been most extensively studied in the context of single-lung ventilation during thoracic surgery. However, the awareness of association of VILI risk and patient positioning (prone, beach-chair, park-bench) and type of surgery must be raised.

Intraoperative lung protection: strategies and their impact on outcomes

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The present review summarizes the current knowledge and the barriers encountered when implementing tailoring lung-protective ventilation strategies to individual patients based on advanced monitoring systems.

RECENT FINDINGS

Lung-protective ventilation has become a pivotal component of perioperative care, aiming to enhance patient outcomes and reduce the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs). High-quality research has established the benefits of strategies such as low tidal volume ventilation and low driving pressures. Debate is still ongoing on the most suitable levels of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and the role of recruitment maneuvers. Adapting PEEP according to patient-specific factors offers potential benefits in maintaining ventilation distribution uniformity, especially in challenging scenarios like pneumoperitoneum and steep Trendelenburg positions. Advanced monitoring systems, which continuously assess patient responses and enable the fine-tuning of ventilation parameters, offer real-time data analytics to predict and prevent impending lung complications. However, their impact on postoperative outcomes, particularly PPCs, is an ongoing area of research.

SUMMARY

Refining protective lung ventilation is crucial to provide patients with the best possible care during surgery, reduce the incidence of PPCs, and improve their overall surgical journey.

Effect of incremental PEEP titration on postoperative pulmonary complications in patients undergoing emergency laparotomy: a randomized controlled trial

Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPC) has a significant negative impact and are associated with increased length of hospital stay and cost of care. Emergency surgery is a well-established risk factor for PPC. Previous studies reported that personalized positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) might reduce postoperative atelectasis and postoperative pulmonary complications. N = 168 adult patients undergoing major emergency laparotomy under general anesthesia were recruited in this study. A minimum driving pressure based incremental PEEP titration was compared to a fixed PEEP of 5 cmH2O. The primary outcome was PPC up to postoperative day 7. The mean (standard deviation) of the recruited patients was 41.7(16.1)y, and 48.8% (82 of 168 patients) were female. The risk of PPC at postoperative day 7 was similar in both the study groups [Relative risk (RR) (95% Confidence interval, CI) 0.81 (0.58, 1.13); p = 0.25]. In addition, the incidence of intraoperative hypotension [p = 0.75], oxygen-free days at day 28 [p = 0.27], duration of postoperative hospital stay [p = 0.50], length of postoperative intensive care unit stay [p = 0.28], and in-hospital mortality [p = 0.38] were similar in two groups. Incidence of PPC was not reduced with the use of an individualized PEEP strategy based on lowest driving pressure. However, the incidence of hypotension and bradycardia was also not increased with titrated PEEP.Trial Registration: www.ctri.nic.in ; CTRI/2020/12/029765.

Effects of individualized positive end-expiratory pressure on intraoperative oxygenation in thoracic surgical patients: study protocol for a prospective randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Intraoperative hypoxemia and postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) often occur in patients with one-lung ventilation (OLV), due to both pulmonary shunt and atelectasis. It has been demonstrated that individualized positive end-expiratory pressure (iPEEP) can effectively improve intraoperative oxygenation, increase lung compliance, and reduce driving pressure, thereby decreasing the risk of developing PPCs. However, its effect during OLV is still unknown. Therefore, we aim to investigate whether iPEEP ventilation during OLV is superior to 5 cmH2O PEEP in terms of intraoperative oxygenation and the occurrence of PPCs.

METHODS

This study is a prospective, randomized controlled, single-blind, single-center trial. A total of 112 patients undergoing thoracoscopic pneumonectomy surgery and OLV will be enrolled in the study. They will be randomized into two groups: the static lung compliance guided iPEEP titration group (Cst-iPEEP Group) and the constant 5 cmH2O PEEP group (PEEP 5 Group). The primary outcome will be the oxygenation index at 30 min after OLV and titration. Secondary outcomes are oxygenation index at other operative time points, PPCs, postoperative adverse events, ventilator parameters, vital signs, pH value, inflammatory factors, and economic indicators.

DISCUSSION

This trial explores the effect of iPEEP on intraoperative oxygenation during OLV and PPCs. It provides some clinical references for optimizing the lung protective ventilation strategy of OLV, improving patient prognosis, and accelerating postoperative rehabilitation.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

www.Chictr.org.cn ChiCTR2300073411 . Registered on 10 July 2023.

Impact of ventilation strategies on pulmonary and cardiovascular complications in patients undergoing general anaesthesia for elective surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Many RCTs have evaluated the influence of intraoperative tidal volume (tV), PEEP, and driving pressure on the occurrence of postoperative pulmonary complications, cardiovascular complications, and mortality in adult patients. Our meta-analysis aimed to investigate the association between tV, PEEP, and driving pressure and the above-mentioned outcomes.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs from inception to May 19, 2022. The primary outcome was the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications; the secondary outcomes were intraoperative cardiovascular complications and 30-day mortality. Primary and secondary outcomes were evaluated stratifying patients in the following groups: (1) low tV (LV, tV 6-8 ml kg-1 and PEEP ≥5 cm H2O) vs high tV (HV, tV >8 ml kg-1 and PEEP=0 cm H2O); (2) higher PEEP (HP, ≥6 cm H2O) vs lower PEEP (LP, <6 cm H2O); and (3) driving pressure-guided PEEP (DP) vs fixed PEEP (FP).

RESULTS

We included 16 RCTs with a total sample size of 4993. The incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications was lower in patients treated with LV than with HV (OR=0.402, CI 0.280-0.577, P<0.001) and lower in DP than in FP group (OR=0.358, CI 0.187-0.684, P=0.002). Postoperative pulmonary complications did not differ between HP and LP groups; the incidence of intraoperative cardiovascular complications was higher in HP group (OR=1.385, CI 1.027-1.867, P=0.002). The 30-day mortality was not influenced by the ventilation strategy.

CONCLUSIONS

Optimal intraoperative mechanical ventilation is unclear; however, our meta-analysis showed that low tidal volume and driving pressure-guided PEEP strategies were associated with a reduction in postoperative pulmonary complications.

Effect of driving pressure-guided positive end-expiratory pressure on postoperative pulmonary complications in patients undergoing laparoscopic or robotic surgery: a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Individualised positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) improves respiratory mechanics. However, whether PEEP reduces postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) remains unclear. We investigated whether driving pressure-guided PEEP reduces PPCs after laparoscopic/robotic abdominal surgery.

METHODS

This single-centre, randomised controlled trial enrolled patients at risk for PPCs undergoing laparoscopic or robotic lower abdominal surgery. The individualised group received driving pressure-guided PEEP, whereas the comparator group received 5 cm H2O fixed PEEP during surgery. Both groups received a tidal volume of 8 ml kg-1 ideal body weight. The primary outcome analysed per protocol was a composite of pulmonary complications (defined by pre-specified clinical and radiological criteria) within 7 postoperative days after surgery.

RESULTS

Some 384 patients (median age: 67 yr [inter-quartile range: 61-73]; 66 [18%] female) were randomised. Mean (standard deviation) PEEP in patients randomised to individualised PEEP (n=178) was 13.6 cm H2O (2.1). Individualised PEEP resulted in lower mean driving pressures (14.7 cm H2O [2.6]), compared with 185 patients randomised to standard PEEP (18.4 cm H2O [3.2]; mean difference: -3.7 cm H2O [95% confidence interval (CI): -4.3 to -3.1 cm H2O]; P<0.001). There was no difference in the incidence of pulmonary complications between individualised (25/178 [14.0%]) vs standard PEEP (36/185 [19.5%]; risk ratio [95% CI], 0.72 [0.45-1.15]; P=0.215). Pulmonary complications as a result of desaturation were less frequent in patients randomised to individualised PEEP (8/178 [4.5%], compared with standard PEEP (30/185 [16.2%], risk ratio [95% CI], 0.28 [0.13-0.59]; P=0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Driving pressure-guided PEEP did not decrease the incidence of pulmonary complications within 7 days of laparoscopic or robotic lower abdominal surgery, although uncertainty remains given the lower than anticipated event rate for the primary outcome.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

KCT0004888 (http://cris.nih.go.kr, registration date: April 6, 2020).

The effect of driving pressure-guided versus conventional mechanical ventilation strategy on pulmonary complications following on-pump cardiac surgery: A randomized clinical trial

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Postoperative pulmonary complications occur frequently and are associated with worse postoperative outcomes in cardiac surgical patients. The advantage of driving pressure-guided ventilation strategy in decreasing pulmonary complications remains to be definitively established. We aimed to investigate the effect of intraoperative driving pressure-guided ventilation strategy compared with conventional lung-protective ventilation on pulmonary complications following on-pump cardiac surgery.

DESIGN

Prospective, two-arm, randomized controlled trial.

SETTING

The West China university hospital in Sichuan, China.

PATIENTS

Adult patients who were scheduled for elective on-pump cardiac surgery were enrolled in the study.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients undergoing on-pump cardiac surgery were randomized to receive driving pressure-guided ventilation strategy based on positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) titration or conventional lung-protective ventilation strategy with fixed 5 cmH2O of PEEP.

MEASUREMENTS

The primary outcome of pulmonary complications (including acute respiratory distress syndrome, atelectasis, pneumonia, pleural effusion, and pneumothorax) within the first 7 postoperative days were prospectively identified. Secondary outcomes included pulmonary complication severity, ICU length of stay, and in-hospital and 30-day mortality.

MAIN RESULTS

Between August 2020 and July 2021, we enrolled 694 eligible patients who were included in the final analysis. Postoperative pulmonary complications occurred in 140 (40.3%) patients in the driving pressure group and 142 (40.9%) in the conventional group (relative risk, 0.99; 95% confidence interval, 0.82-1.18; P = 0.877). Intention-to-treat analysis showed no significant difference between study groups regarding the incidence of primary outcome. The driving pressure group had less atelectasis than the conventional group (11.5% vs 17.0%; relative risk, 0.68; 95% confidence interval, 0.47-0.98; P = 0.039). Secondary outcomes did not differ between groups.

CONCLUSION

Among patients who underwent on-pump cardiac surgery, the use of driving pressure-guided ventilation strategy did not reduce the risk of postoperative pulmonary complications when compared with conventional lung-protective ventilation strategy.

Driving Pressure-Guided Ventilation in Obese Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Purpose

This study aims to compare the conventional lung protective ventilation strategy (LPVS) with driving pressure-guided ventilation in obese patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG).

Methods

Forty-five patients undergoing elective LSG under general anesthesia were randomly assigned to the conventional LPVS group (group L) or the driving pressure-guided ventilation group (group D) using random numbers generated by Excel. The primary outcome was the driving pressure of both groups 90 min after pneumoperitoneum.

Results

After 30 min of pneumoperitoneum, 90 min of pneumoperitoneum, 10 min of closing the pneumoperitoneum, and restoring the supine position, the driving pressure of group L and group D were 20.0 ± 2.9 cm H2O vs 16.6 ± 3.0 cm H2O (P < 0.001), 20.7 ± 3.2 cm H2O vs 17.3 ± 2.8 cm H2O (P < 0.001), and 16.3 ± 3.1 cm H2O vs 13.3 ± 2.5 cm H2O (P = 0.001), respectively; the respiratory compliance of groups L and D were 23.4 ± 3.7 mL/cm H2O vs 27.6 ± 5.1 mL/cm H2O (P = 0.003), 22.7 ± 3.8 mL/cm H2O vs 26.4 ± 3.5 mL/cm H2O (P = 0.005), and 29.6 ± 6.8 mL/cm H2O vs 34.7 ± 5.3 mL/cm H2O (P = 0.007), respectively. The intraoperative PEEP in groups L and group D was 5 (5-5) cm H2O vs 10 (9-11) cm H2O (P < 0.001).

Conclusion

An individualized peep-based driving pressure-guided ventilation strategy can reduce intraoperative driving pressure and increase respiratory compliance in obese patients undergoing LSG.

Effect of driving pressure on early postoperative lung gas distribution in supratentorial craniotomy: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Neurosurgical patients represent a high-risk population for postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs). A lower intraoperative driving pressure (DP) is related to a reduction in postoperative pulmonary complications. We hypothesized that driving pressure-guided ventilation during supratentorial craniotomy might lead to a more homogeneous gas distribution in the lung postoperatively.

METHODS

This was a randomized trial conducted between June 2020 and July 2021 at Beijing Tiantan Hospital. Fifty-three patients undergoing supratentorial craniotomy were randomly divided into the titration group or control group at a ratio of 1 to 1. The control group received 5 cmH₂O PEEP, and the titration group received individualized PEEP targeting the lowest DP. The primary outcome was the global inhomogeneity index (GI) immediately after extubation obtained by electrical impedance tomography (EIT). The secondary outcomes were lung ultrasonography scores (LUSs), respiratory system compliance, the ratio of the partial pressure of arterial oxygen to the fraction of inspired oxygen (PaO₂/FiO₂) and PPCs within 3 days postoperatively.

RESULTS

Fifty-one patients were included in the analysis. The median (IQR [range]) DP in the titration group versus the control group was 10 (9-12 [7-13]) cmH₂O vs. 11 (10-12 [7-13]) cmH₂O, respectively (P = 0.040). The GI tract did not differ between groups immediately after extubation (P = 0.080). The LUS_S was significantly lower in the titration group than in the control group immediately after tracheal extubation (1 [0-3] vs. 3 [1-6], P = 0.045). The compliance in the titration group was higher than that in the control group at 1 h after intubation (48 [42-54] vs. 41 [37-46] ml·cmH₂O^-1, P = 0.011) and at the end of surgery (46 [42-51] vs. 41 [37-44] ml·cmH₂O^-1, P = 0.029). The PaO₂/FiO₂ ratio was not significantly different between groups in terms of the ventilation protocol (P = 0.117). At the 3-day follow-up, no postoperative pulmonary complications occurred in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

Driving pressure-guided ventilation during supratentorial craniotomy did not contribute to postoperative homogeneous aeration, but it may lead to improved respiratory compliance and lower lung ultrasonography scores.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04421976.

Driving pressure-guided ventilation improves homogeneity in lung gas distribution for gynecological laparoscopy: a randomized controlled trial

To investigate whether driving pressure-guided ventilation could contribute to a more homogeneous distribution in the lung for gynecological laparoscopy. Chinese patients were randomized, after pneumoperitoneum, to receive either positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) of 5 cm H₂O (control group), or individualized PEEP producing the lowest driving pressure (titration group). Ventilation homogeneity is quantified as the global inhomogeneity (GI) index based on electrical impedance tomography, with a lower index implying more homogeneous ventilation. The perioperative arterial oxygenation index and respiratory system mechanics were also recorded. Blood samples were collected for lung injury biomarkers including interleukin-10, neutrophil elastase, and Clara Cell protein-16. A total of 48 patients were included for analysis. We observed a significant increase in the GI index immediately after tracheal extubation compared to preinduction in the control group (p = 0.040) but not in the titration group (p = 0.279). Furthermore, the GI index was obviously lower in the titration group than in the control group [0.390 (0.066) vs 0.460 (0.074), p = 0.0012]. The oxygenation index and respiratory compliance were significantly higher in the titration group than in the control group. No significant differences in biomarkers or hemodynamics were detected between the two groups. Driving pressure-guided PEEP led to more homogeneous ventilation, as well as improved gas exchange and respiratory compliance for patients undergoing gynecological laparoscopy.Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04374162; first registration on 05/05/2020.