Effect of pocket irrigation with antimicrobial on prevention of pacemaker pocket infection: a meta-analysis

Phototherapy to Facilitate Wound Healing Following Pacemaker Infection: A Promising Tool to Improve Outcomes

Device infection remains a dreaded and increasingly common complication of pacemaker procedures, often mandating removal of all implanted materials. Intensive wound management may be necessary following extraction, requiring multiple follow-up encounters in the outpatient setting. Here, a case of pacemaker pocket infection necessitating complete system extraction is presented. A cutaneous phototherapy device (X39®; LifeWave, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) was used to facilitate wound closure. Healing was found to occur 40%-50% faster with this adjunctive therapy, reducing the number of follow-up visits by half. These adhesive patches contain natural compounds that reflect back infrared frequencies emitted by the skin. Biologic activity includes elevation of glycyl-L-histidyl-L-lysine levels, with a plethora of effects. This non-pharmacological wellness device may be useful to hasten wound healing and recovery from pocket infection.

An Approach to Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Pocket Infections: From Prevention to Diagnosis and Management

Cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infections are a highly morbid and potentially fatal complication of CIED implantation. Prompt diagnosis is paramount to the proper management of such infections. This review seeks to highlight the pathophysiology, risk factors, diagnostic approach, and prevention strategies for CIED infection, with an emphasis on pocket infection. Management will be discussed in detail, with complete device removal representing the standard of case, but with conservative management representing a potential alternative for patients at high risk for extraction. The high prevalence of CIED in the cardiac population renders understanding of this subject essential for the practicing clinician.

Prevention and Risk Assessment of Cardiac Device Infections in Clinical Practice

The implantation of cardiac electronic devices (CIEDs), including pacemakers and defibrillators, has become increasingly prevalent in recent years and has been accompanied by a significant rise in cardiac device infections (CDIs), which pose a substantial clinical and economic burden. CDIs are associated with hospitalizations and prolonged antibiotic therapy and often necessitate device removal, leading to increased morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs worldwide. Approximately 1-2% of CIED implants are associated with infections, making this a critical issue to address. In this contemporary review, we discuss the burden of CDIs with their risk factors, healthcare costs, prevention strategies, and clinical management.

Use of a taurolidine containing antimicrobial wash to reduce cardiac implantable electronic device infection

AIMS

TauroPace (Tauropharm, Bavaria Germany), a taurolidine solution for combating cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infection, was compared with a historical control of 3% hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) in a prospective observational study.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The device pocket was irrigated, and all hardware accessible within (leads, suture sleeves, pulse generator) was wiped with H2O2, TauroPace, or taurolidine in a galenic formulation during any invasive CIED procedure at the study centre. Only CIED procedures covered by TauroPace or H2O2 from 1 January 2017 to 28 February 2022 were included for analysis. Patients who underwent >1 procedure were censored for the last treatment group and reassigned at the next procedure. The primary endpoint was major CIED infection within 3 months. The secondary endpoints were CIED infection beyond 3 months, adverse events potentially related to the antimicrobial solutions, CIED system, procedure, and death, till the end of follow-up. TauroPace covered 654 procedures on 631 patients, and H2O2 covered 551 procedures on 532 patients. The TauroPace group had more patient risk factors for infection than the H2O2 group (P = 0.0058) but similar device and procedure-specific risk factors (P = 0.17). Cardiac implantable electronic device infection occurred in 0/654 (0%) of the TauroPace group and 6/551 (1.1%) of the H2O2 group (P = 0.0075). Death occurred in 23/654 (3.5%) of the TauroPace group and 14/551 (2.5%) of the H2O2 group (P = 0.33). Non-infection related adverse events were rarer in the TauroPace (3.8%) than the H2O2 (6.0%) group (P = 0.0802).

CONCLUSION

TauroPace is safe but more effective than H2O2 in reducing CIED infection.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05576194.

Efficacy and safety of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in patients (≥80 years of age) with atrial fibrillation: systematic review and meta-analysis

Findings of prior studies about the efficacy and safety of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in patients (≥80 years of age) with atrial fibrillation (AF) are controversial. So we performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of NOACs versus vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in patients (≥80 years of age) with AF. A systematic review of PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, Web of Science and Chinese BioMedical databases was conducted until 1 October 2022. Studies reporting the effects and safety of NOACs versus warfarin in patients (≥80 years of age) with AF were included. Two authors independently performed study selection and data extraction. Discrepancies were resolved by consensus or through an independent third reviewer. Data were synthesised according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews guidelines. We identified 15 studies providing data of 70 446 participants (≥80 years of age) suffering from AF. According to the meta-analysis (odds ratio (OR) (95% confidence interval, CI)), NOACs conferred better efficacy profile than VKAs in stroke and systemic embolism (0.8 (0.73-0.88)) and all-cause mortality (0.61 (0.57-0.65)). Otherwise, NOACs conferred a better safety profile than VKAs in major bleeding (0.76 (0.70-0.83)) and intracranial haemorrhage (ICH; 0.57 (0.47-0.68)). In conclusion, for patients (≥80 years of age) with AF, the risks of stroke and systemic embolism, all-cause mortality, were lower in NOACs compared to warfarin. The risks of major bleeding and ICH were also lower in NOACs compared to warfarin. NOACs showed better efficacy and safety than warfarin.

Treatment with gentamicin-impregnated collagen sponges in reducing infection of implantable cardiac devices: 10-year analysis with propensity score matching

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

The incidence of device infection has increased over time and is associated with increased mortality in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). Gentamicin-impregnated collagen sponges (GICSs) are useful in preventing surgical site infection (SSI) in cardiac surgery. Nevertheless, to date, there is no evidence concerning their use in CIED procedures. Our study aims to determine the effectiveness of treatment with GICSs in preventing CIED infection.

METHODS

A total of 2986 adult patients who received CIEDs between 2010 and 2020 were included. Before device implantation, all patients received routine periprocedural systemic antibiotic prophylaxis. The study endpoints were the CIED infection rate at one year and the effectiveness of the use of GICSs in reducing CIED infection.

RESULTS

Among 1524 pacemaker, 942 ICD and 520 CRT implantations, CIED infection occurred in 36 patients (1.2%). Early reintervention (OR 9 [95% CI 3.180-25.837], p<0.001), pocket hematoma (OR 11 [95% CI 4.195-28.961], p<0.001), diabetes (OR 2.9 [95% CI 1.465-5.799], p=0.002) and prolonged procedural time (OR 1.02 [95% CI 1.008-1.034], p=0.001) were independent risk factors for CIED infection. Treatment with GICSs reduced CIED infections significantly ([95% CI -0.031 to -0.001], p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of GICSs may help in reducing infections associated with CIED implantation.

A Survey of Antibiotic Use During Insertion of Cardiovascular Implantable Devices Among United States Implanters

Antibiotic use for cardiovascular implantable devices (CIED) prophylaxis is well-accepted despite a paucity of data. Pre-procedural prophylaxis lowers the rate of CIED infections; however, data is lacking for intra- or post-procedural antibiotic use. Antibiotic-eluting envelopes (ENVELOPE) [TYRX^®TM] have been shown to reduce post-procedural infections. Understanding implanter practices may provide insight as to the need for antibiotic stewardship. The purpose of this survey was to assess the practices of implanters nationally. A survey was completed by 150 implanters across the US. Participants were board certificated, implanters of CIEDs, with varying experience (1-25 years), in various hospital settings. Of the respondents, 97% reported routine use of systemic antibiotics pre-operatively. About two-thirds of implanters continue systemic antibiotics post-operatively, with half continuing antibiotics for >24 h; 83% of implanters add antibiotic to saline for the purpose of irrigating the wound; 55% routinely use ENVELOPE on approximately 38% of patients. Common reasons cited for ENVELOPE use were infection concerns, significant risk factors, prior device infection, and immunosuppressed status. Two-thirds of respondents use systemic antibiotics during generator changes, with >50% continuing antibiotics for >24 h. This study suggests wide variations in practice among implanters. Additional attention to existing guidelines and evidence regarding appropriate use of ENVELOPE is still needed.

The utility of postoperative systemic antibiotic prophylaxis following cardiovascular implantable electronic device implantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

There is insufficient evidence regarding postoperative systemic antibiotic prophylaxis use for more than 24 hours following cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIED) implantation and its impact on infection prevention. However, this strategy remains a common practice in many institutions.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis including studies that compared the outcomes of patients: 1) who received preoperative plus 24 hours or more of postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis (intervention group); and 2) who received either preoperative only or preoperative plus less than 24 hours of antibiotic prophylaxis (control group). Risk of bias was assessed with ROBINS-I and ROB-2 tools. Risk ratio (RR) was pooled using random-effect meta-analyses with inverse variance method.

RESULTS

Eight studies that included two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and six cohort studies with a total of 26,187 patients were included in the analysis. Overall, there were no differences in outcomes between the two groups, which included rates of CIED infection (RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.42, 1.42), mortality (RR 1.19, 95% CI 0.69, 2.06), pocket hematoma (RR 1.15, 95% CI 0.44, 3.00) or reintervention (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.22, 3.46). Of note, the results were primarily impacted by the larger RCT.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no benefit of postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis for more than 24 hours following CIED implantation in the current systematic review and meta-analysis. This supports the practice advocated by current guidelines which foster antibiotic stewardship and may result in reductions of adverse drug events, selection for antibiotic resistance, and financial costs of prolonged postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

A Review of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Infections for the Practicing Electrophysiologist

Cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) infections are morbid, costly, and difficult to manage. This review explores the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management of CIED infections. Diagnostic accuracy has been improved through increased awareness and improved imaging strategies. Pocket or bloodstream infection with virulent organisms often requires complete system extraction. Emerging prophylactic interventions and novel devices have expanded preventative strategies and options for re-implantation. A clear and nuanced understanding of CIED infection is important to the practicing electrophysiologist.

Meta-Analysis Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Low-Intensity Warfarin for Patients >65 Years of Age With Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation

Nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) is the most common arrhythmia. It is of a high disability and death rate, and seriously affects quality of life. Although New oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are recommended for anticoagulation therapy of atrial fibrillation, they are not widely used for the high cost and limited availability. Warfarin is effective and economical. The risk of thromboembolism and anticoagulant hemorrhage is higher in patients >65 years with NVAF. So, it is of great clinical significance to explore the optimal anticoagulation intensity of warfarin in patients >65 years of China, and other ethnicities. Some studies suggested that low-intensity international normalized ratio (INR) has similar antithrombotic efficacy comparing to standard-intensity INR, whereas bleeding risk was significantly reduced. But others showed conflicting results. We pooled the efficacy and safety data of low- and standard-intensity warfarin therapy for patients over 65 years with NVAF by meta-analysis, as to evaluate optimal INR intensity of warfarin therapy in patients over 65 years. We identified 18 studies providing data of 2105 patients receiving anticoagulation therapy with warfarin. On meta-analysis (odds ratio [OR] [95% confidence interval {CI}]), low-intensity INR conferred similar efficacy to standard intensity INR on all thrombosis (1.28 [0.90 to 1.81]), stroke (1.09 [0.67 to 1.77]), other thromboembolism ([peripheral and pulmonary embolism] 2.26 [0.89 to 5.79]), and all cause death (1.38 [0.94 to 2.02]). Low-intensity INR conferred better safety profile than standard intensity INR in major bleeding (intracranial and gastrointestinal hemorrhage) (0.32 [0.19 to 0.52]), minor bleeding (gum, nasal cavity and conjunctival hemorrhage, skin ecchymosis, hematuria, hemoptysis) (0.30 [0.20 to 0.45]), and all bleeding (0.30 [0.22 to 0.40]). In conclusion, low-intensity INR (1.5 to 2.0) of warfarin therapy is as effective as standard intensity INR (2.0 to 3.0) therapy in reducing thromboembolic risk in patients>65 years with NVAF, and has a safer profile of bleeding.

[Characteristic and evolution of pacemaker complications in a Subsaharan Africa Heart Centre]

AIM OF THE STUDY

The working environment and the low rate of pacemaker insertions increase the risk of complications in sub-Saharan Africa. The objective of our work was to assess the impact of specific preventive measures on these complications over the long term.

PATIENT AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study of all pacemaker implantations from June 2006 to June 2016 at the Abidjan Heart Institute. We evaluated the incidence of pacemaker complications, their risks factors and their impact on the overall prognosis of patients.

RESULTS

Three hundred and two procedures were performed in 286 patients (49% male, mean age: 67±12 years), with a predominance of primary implantation (82.8%) of single-chamber ventricular pacemakers (66.6%). Twenty-five major complications (8.27%) and 14 minor (4.6%) occurred with a predominance of lead displacements (3.64%). The major complications were favored by the subclavian approach (P=0.018; OR=2.34; 95% CI [1.16-4.75]) and intraoperative incidents (P=0.02; OR=2.17; 95% CI [1.16-4.75]. The preventive measures taken made it possible to achieve a significant (P=0.017) and linear (P=0.009) reduction of these complications, with no effect the patients prognosis (Log-Rank=0.217; P=0.64).

CONCLUSION

Quality cardiac stimulation is possible in Sub-Saharan Africa with preventive measures adapted to the environment.

Antibiotic Prophylaxis and Treatment in Early Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices Infection

Background

Cardiac implantable electronic devices - PM, ICD, and CRTs- are well-proven life-sustaining and the ultimate destination for many heart conditions. Based on scientific evidence, there is a worldwide incremental increase in CIED implantations numbers.

Objective

Early infection of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED)- pacemaker (PM), implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD), and cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT)- is a growing health challenge. We examined the effectiveness of antibiotic prophylaxis and treatment of early infection of CIED in a single center.

Methods

This is a retrospective, single-center observational study. Data were collected from patients' records from July 2017-July, 2019. All Patients received intravenous ceftriaxone 2gm before incision, Gentamicin 120mg pocket irrigation, and oral Amoxicillin/Clavulanate for 5 days post-implantation.

Results

A 639 consecutive CIED implantations - PM (n=474, mean age, 64yr, female=49%), ICD (n=106, mean age 56yr, female=17%) and CRT (n=59, mean age, 54yr, female=20%)- were performed over 3years. The incidence of early infection was 1.9% (12 cases), female=41%. PM=5/474, ICD=5/106, and CRT=2/59. Three out of the 12 patients had total device explant due to pocket abscess; one PM had a generator changed; one ICD who had a pneumothorax, and the third one had reimplantation after ICD lead perforation. Nine cases were managed conservatively using saline dressing and oral Amoxicillin/Clavulanate, 3/9 patients developed a hematoma, 4/9 patients developed purulent suture line infection. None of them had infection recurrence on three months follow up.

Conclusion

Early infection of CIED is a rare complication with multiple predisposing factors. Our protocol is reassurance and prompt initiation of management protocol to prevent and treat this issue's sequences.

Bundled skin antiseptic preparation for complex cardiac implantable electronic device infection: a propensity-score matching cohort study

BACKGROUND

Cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infection, a major complication of a CIED implant procedure, can prolong hospitalization and cause mortality.

AIM

To evaluate the efficacy of a bundled skin antiseptic preparation for preventing infection after implantation of a complex CIED.

METHODS

This study analysed 1163 consecutive patients who had received a bundled skin antiseptic preparation before CIED implantation from July 2012 to December 2017. According to the complexity of the CIED implant procedure, the patients were divided into a complex CIED group (N = 370) and a non-complex CIED group (N = 793). A complex procedure was defined as a pacemaker replacement, implantation of implantable cardioverter defibrillator and cardiac resynchronization therapy, device upgrade, or lead revision.

FINDINGS

During a mean follow-up of 2.9 ± 1.7 years, CIED infection developed in 15 patients (1.3%), and the incidence of minor and major infection was 1.1% and 0.2%, respectively. The incidence of CIED infection did not significantly differ between the complex CIED group and the non-complex CIED group (1.1% vs 1.4%, respectively; non-significant). Multivariate analysis indicated that procedural complexity was not an independent predictor of CIED infection. After 2:1 propensity score matching, the matched non-complex CIED group and the matched complex CIED group still showed no significant difference in the incidence of CIED infection.

CONCLUSION

Bundled skin antiseptic preparation is an effective and widely applicable strategy for decreasing infection risk after a complex CIED implantation.

Clinical practice and implementation of guidelines for the prevention, diagnosis and management of cardiac implantable electronic device infections: results of a worldwide survey under the auspices of the European Heart Rhythm Association

AIMS

Cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infection rates are increasing. Worldwide compliance and disparities to published guidelines for the prevention, diagnosis and management of these conditions are not well elucidated. The purpose of this survey, therefore, was to clarify these issues through an inquiry to arrhythmia-related associations and societies worldwide.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A questionnaire comprising 15 questions related to CIED infections was distributed among members of seven arrhythmia societies worldwide. A total of 234 centres in 62 countries reported implantation rates of which 159 (68.0%) performed more than 200 device implantations per year and 14 (6.0%) performed fewer than 50 implantations per year. The reported rates of CIED infections for 2017 were ≤2% in 78.7% of the centres, while the infection rates exceeded 5% in 7.8% of the centres. Preventive measures for CIED infection differed from published recommendations and varied among different regions mainly in terms of pocket irrigation and administering post-operative antimicrobial therapy the use of which was reported by 39.9% and 44% of the respondents, respectively. Antibacterial envelopes were used by 37.7% of the respondents in selected circumstances. In terms of pocket infection management, 62% of the respondents applied complete system removal as an initial step. Diagnostic pocket needle aspiration and pocket surgical debridement were reported by 15.8% and 11.8% of centres, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Clinical practices for prevention and management of CIED do not fully comply with current recommendations and demonstrate considerable regional disparities. Further education and programmes for improved implementation of guidelines are mandatory.

Real-world effectiveness of infection prevention interventions for reducing procedure-related cardiac device infections: Insights from the veterans affairs clinical assessment reporting and tracking program

OBJECTIVE

To measure the association between receipt of specific infection prevention interventions and procedure-related cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infections.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort with manually reviewed infection status.

SETTING

Setting: National, multicenter Veterans Health Administration (VA) cohort.

PARTICIPANTS

Sampling of procedures entered into the VA Clinical Assessment Reporting and Tracking-Electrophysiology (CART-EP) database from fiscal years 2008 through 2015.

METHODS

A sample of procedures entered into the CART-EP database underwent manual review for occurrence of CIED infection and other clinical/procedural variables. The primary outcome was 6-month incidence of CIED infection. Measures of association were calculated using multivariable generalized estimating equations logistic regression.

RESULTS

We identified 101 procedure-related CIED infections among 2,098 procedures (4.8% of reviewed sample). Factors associated with increased odds of infections included (1) wound complications (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 8.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.16-24.20), (2) revisions including generator changes (aOR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.59-3.63), (3) an elevated international normalized ratio (INR) &gt;1.5 (aOR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.12-2.18), and (4) methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus colonization (aOR, 9.56; 95% CI, 1.55-27.77). Clinically effective prevention interventions included preprocedural skin cleaning with chlorhexidine versus other topical agents (aOR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.22-0.76) and receipt of β-lactam antimicrobial prophylaxis versus vancomycin (aOR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.37-0.96). The use of mesh pockets and continuation of antimicrobial prophylaxis after skin closure were not associated with reduced infection risk.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings regarding the real-world clinical effectiveness of different prevention strategies can be applied to the development of evidence-based protocols and infection prevention guidelines specific to the electrophysiology laboratory.