1
|
Yamanaka K, Kakuta Y, Nakazawa S, Kobayashi K, Nonomura N, Kageyama S. Surgical and Infectious Complications Following Kidney Transplantation: A Contemporary Review. J Clin Med 2025; 14:3307. [PMID: 40429301 PMCID: PMC12112604 DOI: 10.3390/jcm14103307] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2025] [Revised: 04/24/2025] [Accepted: 05/02/2025] [Indexed: 05/29/2025] Open
Abstract
Kidney transplantation significantly improves outcomes in patients with end-stage renal disease; however, postoperative complications remain a substantial concern. This review summarizes the incidence, risk factors, and management strategies for common complications after kidney transplantation. Reported incidence varies widely due to differences in definitions, diagnostic methods, and study designs. Ureteral stenosis occurs in 2.8-18.0% of recipients, vesicoureteral reflux in 0.5-86%, and urinary leakage in 1.1-7.2%. Lymphatic complications, including lymphocele and lymphorrhea, range from 0.6% to 35.2%, with one-third of complications requiring intervention. The incidence of urinary tract infections ranges from 20 to 43%, while asymptomatic bacteriuria is reported in up to 53% of recipients. Surgical site infections have a median incidence of 3.7%, and incisional hernias develop in 2.5-10% of cases, depending on follow-up duration. Vascular complications affect approximately 10% of recipients, with renal artery stenosis and thrombosis being the most prevalent. Neurologic complications, such as femoral nerve palsy and immunosuppression-related neurotoxicity, though less frequent, can impair recovery. Management strategies vary depending on severity, ranging from observation to surgical intervention. Preventive measures-including optimized ureteral stenting protocols, early catheter removal, careful immunosuppression, and appropriate antimicrobial use-play a crucial role in reducing complication risk. Despite advances in transplantation techniques and perioperative care, these complications continue to affect graft survival and patient outcomes. Further research is needed to standardize definitions and establish evidence-based protocols.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kazuaki Yamanaka
- Department of Urology, Shiga University of Medical Science, Otsu 520-2192, Japan; (K.K.); (S.K.)
- Department of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka 565-0871, Japan; (Y.K.); (S.N.); (N.N.)
| | - Yoichi Kakuta
- Department of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka 565-0871, Japan; (Y.K.); (S.N.); (N.N.)
| | - Shigeaki Nakazawa
- Department of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka 565-0871, Japan; (Y.K.); (S.N.); (N.N.)
| | - Kenichi Kobayashi
- Department of Urology, Shiga University of Medical Science, Otsu 520-2192, Japan; (K.K.); (S.K.)
| | - Norio Nonomura
- Department of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka 565-0871, Japan; (Y.K.); (S.N.); (N.N.)
| | - Susumu Kageyama
- Department of Urology, Shiga University of Medical Science, Otsu 520-2192, Japan; (K.K.); (S.K.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zhang L, Zou J, Zhou J, Qiu T, Kong C, Wang T, Chen Z, Liu X. Graft survival after percutaneous transluminal renal stenting for transplant renal artery stenosis (TRAS) is worse compared to matched cadaveric grafts without TRAS. Ren Fail 2024; 46:2378211. [PMID: 39082473 PMCID: PMC11293260 DOI: 10.1080/0886022x.2024.2378211] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2023] [Revised: 05/29/2024] [Accepted: 07/04/2024] [Indexed: 08/03/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Transplant renal artery stenosis (TRAS) is now recognized as a curable disease with a good prognosis if intervention occurs in the early stage. However, the mid-term outcomes of TRAS when treated by percutaneous transluminal angioplasty with stent placement have yet to be fully elucidated. The purpose of this study was to compare mid-term graft and patient survival of TRAS group with a control group. PATIENTS AND METHODS Ninety-two patients were diagnosed of TRAS between January 2016 and January 2022 in our center. Fifty-six pairs of recipients with grafts from the same donor were selected as a study group with TRAS and a control group without TRAS, respectively. All donor kidneys were from deceased organ donation rather than living donors. The primary endpoints were graft and patient survival. The secondary outcomes were changes in renal graft function. RESULTS The mean follow-up time for the TRAS group was 43.6 months, while the mean follow-up time for the control group was 45.3 months. In the TRAS group, the age of patients ranged from 11 to 62 years with 39 males and 17 females. In the control group, the age of patients ranged from 18 to 67 years with 40 males and 16 females. In the TRAS group, there were more patients with diabetic nephropathy as the primary renal disease compared to the control group (5/56 vs 0/56), and the incidence of acute rejection was higher in the TRAS group than in the control group (12/56 vs 3/56). Eight patients in the TRAS group and one patient in the control group experienced graft loss (p = .019). Four patients in the TRAS group and four patients in the control group died with functional renal allograft during the follow-up time (p = .989). The levels of eGFR did not differ significantly between the two groups in the first three years after kidney transplant (p > .05). Patients in the TRAS group had worse graft functionality (eGFR, 44.96 ± 18.9 vs 54.9 ± 19.6 mL/min) in the fourth year when compared with the control group (p = .01). CONCLUSIONS The graft function deteriorated faster, and graft survival was lower in the TRAS group treated by stent placement when compared with a control group without TRAS over the mid-term.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Long Zhang
- Department of Organ Transplantation, The People’s Hospital Affiliated Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Jilin Zou
- Department of Organ Transplantation, The People’s Hospital Affiliated Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Jiangqiao Zhou
- Department of Organ Transplantation, The People’s Hospital Affiliated Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Tao Qiu
- Department of Organ Transplantation, The People’s Hospital Affiliated Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Chenyang Kong
- Department of Organ Transplantation, The People’s Hospital Affiliated Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Tianyu Wang
- Department of Organ Transplantation, The People’s Hospital Affiliated Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Zhongbao Chen
- Department of Organ Transplantation, The People’s Hospital Affiliated Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Xiuheng Liu
- Department of Urinary Surgery, The People’s Hospital Affiliated Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sarafidis PA, Theodorakopoulou M, Ortiz A, Fernandez-Fernández B, Nistor I, Schmieder R, Arici M, Saratzis A, Van der Niepen P, Halimi JM, Kreutz R, Januszewicz A, Persu A, Cozzolino M. Atherosclerotic renovascular disease: a clinical practice document by the European Renal Best Practice (ERBP) board of the European Renal Association (ERA) and the Working Group Hypertension and the Kidney of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH). Nephrol Dial Transplant 2023; 38:2835-2850. [PMID: 37202218 PMCID: PMC10689166 DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfad095] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2023] [Indexed: 05/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Atherosclerotic renovascular disease (ARVD) is the most common type of renal artery stenosis. It represents a common health problem with clinical presentations relevant to many medical specialties and carries a high risk for future cardiovascular and renal events, as well as overall mortality. The available evidence regarding the management of ARVD is conflicting. Randomized controlled trials failed to demonstrate superiority of percutaneous transluminal renal artery angioplasty (PTRA) with or without stenting in addition to standard medical therapy compared with medical therapy alone in lowering blood pressure levels or preventing adverse renal and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with ARVD, but they carried several limitations and met important criticism. Observational studies showed that PTRA is associated with future cardiorenal benefits in patients presenting with high-risk ARVD phenotypes (i.e. flash pulmonary oedema, resistant hypertension or rapid loss of kidney function). This clinical practice document, prepared by experts from the European Renal Best Practice (ERBP) board of the European Renal Association (ERA) and from the Working Group on Hypertension and the Kidney of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH), summarizes current knowledge in epidemiology, pathophysiology and diagnostic assessment of ARVD and presents, following a systematic literature review, key evidence relevant to treatment, with an aim to support clinicians in decision making and everyday management of patients with this condition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pantelis A Sarafidis
- Department of Nephrology, Hippokration Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Marieta Theodorakopoulou
- Department of Nephrology, Hippokration Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Alberto Ortiz
- Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, IIS-Fundacion Jimenez Diaz UAM, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Ionut Nistor
- Department of Internal Medicine, Nephrology and Geriatrics, Grigore T Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Iasi, Romania
- Department of Nephrology, Dr C I Parhon University Hospital, Iasi, Romania
| | - Roland Schmieder
- Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Mustafa Arici
- Department of Nephrology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Athanasios Saratzis
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences & Leicester Vascular Institute, University Hospital Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Patricia Van der Niepen
- Department of Nephrology & Hypertension, Universitair ziekenhuis Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Jean-Michel Halimi
- Service de Néphrologie-Hypertension, Dialyses, Transplantation rénale, CHRU Tours, Tours, France and INSERM SPHERE U1246, Université Tours, Université de Nantes, Tours, France
| | - Reinhold Kreutz
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Institut für Klinische Pharmakologie und Toxikologie, Berlin, Germany
| | - Andrzej Januszewicz
- Department of Hypertension, National Institute of Cardiology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Alexandre Persu
- Division of Cardiology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc and Pole of Cardiovascular Research, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Mario Cozzolino
- Renal Division, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, Department of Health Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|