1
|
Venturini S, Crapis M, Zanus-Fortes A, Orso D, Cugini F, Fabro GD, Bramuzzo I, Callegari A, Pellis T, Sagnelli V, Marangone A, Pontoni E, Arcidiacono D, De Santi L, Ziraldo B, Valentini G, Santin V, Reffo I, Doretto P, Pratesi C, Pivetta E, Vattamattahil K, De Rosa R, Avolio M, Tedeschi R, Basaglia G, Bove T, Tascini C. Can nCD64 and mCD169 biomarkers improve the diagnosis of viral and bacterial respiratory syndromes in the emergency department? A prospective cohort pilot study. Infection 2025; 53:679-691. [PMID: 39821738 DOI: 10.1007/s15010-024-02468-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2024] [Accepted: 12/30/2024] [Indexed: 01/19/2025]
Abstract
PURPOSE Differentiating infectious from non-infectious respiratory syndromes is critical in emergency settings. This study aimed to assess whether nCD64 and mCD169 exhibit specific distributions in patients with respiratory infections (viral, bacterial, or co-infections) and to evaluate their diagnostic accuracy compared to non-infectious conditions. METHODS A prospective cohort study enrolled 443 consecutive emergency department patients with respiratory syndromes, categorized into four groups: no infection group (NOIG), bacterial infection group (BIG), viral infection group (VIG), and co-infection group (COING). Multinomial logistic regression was used to evaluate nCD64 and mCD169's association with diagnostic groups and estimate their predictive accuracy. RESULTS 290 patients were included in VIG, 53 in BIG, 46 in COING, and 54 in NOIG. nCD64 was associated with bacterial infections and co-infections (p = 2.73 × 10- 16 and p = 8.83 × 10- 11, respectively), but not viral infections. mCD169 was associated with viral infections and co-infections (p = < 2 × 10- 16 and p = 2.45 × 10- 13, respectively), but not bacterial infections. The sensitivity and specificity of nCD64 for detecting bacterial infections were 0.75 and 0.84 (AUC = 0.83), respectively, while for mCD169 they were 0.87 and 0.91 (AUC = 0.92), respectively, for diagnosing viral infections. A diagnostic algorithm incorporating fever, nasopharyngeal swabs for the main respiratory virus, C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, and mCD169 reached an accuracy of 0.79 (95% CI 0.72-0.85) in distinguishing among the different groups. CONCLUSIONS nCD64 and MCD169 seem valuable for distinguishing between bacterial and viral respiratory infections. Integrating these biomarkers into diagnostic algorithms could enhance diagnostic accuracy aiding patient management in emergency settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sergio Venturini
- Department of Infectious Diseases, ASFO "Santa Maria degli Angeli" Hospital of Pordenone, Pordenone, Italy
| | - Massimo Crapis
- Department of Infectious Diseases, ASFO "Santa Maria degli Angeli" Hospital of Pordenone, Pordenone, Italy
| | - Agnese Zanus-Fortes
- Department of Medicine (DMED), University of Udine, Udine, Italy
- Infectious Diseases Clinic, ASUFC "Santa Maria della Misericordia" University Hospital of Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - Daniele Orso
- Department of Emergency, University Hospital of Udine, ASUFC "Santa Maria della Misericordia", Udine, Italy
| | - Francesco Cugini
- Department of Emergency Medicine, ASUFC Hospital of San Daniele, Udine, Italy
| | - Giovanni Del Fabro
- Department of Infectious Diseases, ASFO "Santa Maria degli Angeli" Hospital of Pordenone, Pordenone, Italy
| | - Igor Bramuzzo
- Department of Infectious Diseases, ASFO "Santa Maria degli Angeli" Hospital of Pordenone, Pordenone, Italy
| | - Astrid Callegari
- Department of Infectious Diseases, ASFO "Santa Maria degli Angeli" Hospital of Pordenone, Pordenone, Italy
| | - Tommaso Pellis
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, ASFO "Santa Maria degli Angeli" Hospital of Pordenone, Pordenone, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Sagnelli
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, ASFO "Santa Maria degli Angeli" Hospital of Pordenone, Pordenone, Italy
| | - Anna Marangone
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, ASFO "Santa Maria degli Angeli" Hospital of Pordenone, Pordenone, Italy
| | - Elisa Pontoni
- Department of Emergency Medicine, ASFO "Santa Maria degli Angeli" Hospital of Pordenone, Pordenone, Italy
| | - Domenico Arcidiacono
- Department of Emergency Medicine, ASFO "Santa Maria degli Angeli" Hospital of Pordenone, Pordenone, Italy
| | - Laura De Santi
- Department of Emergency Medicine, ASFO "Santa Maria degli Angeli" Hospital of Pordenone, Pordenone, Italy
| | - Barbra Ziraldo
- Department of Emergency Medicine, ASFO "Santa Maria degli Angeli" Hospital of Pordenone, Pordenone, Italy
| | - Giada Valentini
- Department of Emergency Medicine, ASFO "Santa Maria degli Angeli" Hospital of Pordenone, Pordenone, Italy
| | - Veronica Santin
- Department of Emergency Medicine, ASFO "Santa Maria degli Angeli" Hospital of Pordenone, Pordenone, Italy
| | - Ingrid Reffo
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, ASFO "Santa Maria dei Battuti" Hospital of San Vito al Tagliamento, Pordenone, Italy.
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, San Vito al Tagliamento (Pordenone), ASFO Santa Maria dei Battuti Hospital of San Vito al Tagliamento, via Savorgnano 24, Pordenone, 33078, Italy.
| | - Paolo Doretto
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, ASFO "Santa Maria degli Angeli" Hospital of Pordenone, Pordenone, Italy
| | - Chiara Pratesi
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, ASFO "Santa Maria degli Angeli" Hospital of Pordenone, Pordenone, Italy
| | - Eliana Pivetta
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, ASFO "Santa Maria degli Angeli" Hospital of Pordenone, Pordenone, Italy
| | - Kathreena Vattamattahil
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, ASFO "Santa Maria degli Angeli" Hospital of Pordenone, Pordenone, Italy
| | - Rita De Rosa
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, ASFO "Santa Maria degli Angeli" Hospital of Pordenone, Pordenone, Italy
| | - Manuela Avolio
- Department of Microbiology, ASFO "Santa Maria degli Angeli" Hospital of Pordenone, Pordenone, Italy
| | - Rosamaria Tedeschi
- Department of Microbiology, ASFO "Santa Maria degli Angeli" Hospital of Pordenone, Pordenone, Italy
| | - Giancarlo Basaglia
- Department of Microbiology, ASFO "Santa Maria degli Angeli" Hospital of Pordenone, Pordenone, Italy
| | - Tiziana Bove
- Department of Medicine (DMED), University of Udine, Udine, Italy
- Department of Emergency, University Hospital of Udine, ASUFC "Santa Maria della Misericordia", Udine, Italy
| | - Carlo Tascini
- Department of Medicine (DMED), University of Udine, Udine, Italy
- Infectious Diseases Clinic, ASUFC "Santa Maria della Misericordia" University Hospital of Udine, Udine, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Pratesi C, De Rosa R, Pivetta E, Vattamattathil K, Malipiero G, Fontana DE, Basaglia G, Doretto P. Validation of monocyte CD169 expression as a valuable rapid diagnostic marker of SARS-CoV-2 and other acute viral infections. Am J Clin Pathol 2025; 163:340-349. [PMID: 39305084 DOI: 10.1093/ajcp/aqae127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2024] [Accepted: 08/27/2024] [Indexed: 03/11/2025] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Acute infectious diseases are some of the most common reasons for receiving medical care, and analysis of the host immune response is an attractive approach for their diagnosis. The present study aimed to evaluate the potential usefulness of CD169 expression on peripheral monocytes (mCD169) as a marker of viral-associated host immune response. METHODS In a large mono-institutional cohort of 4,025 patients evaluated for SARS-CoV-2 (CoV2) and other viral infections, mCD169 analysis was performed by rapid flow cytometry assay. RESULTS Increased mCD169 values (median, 17.50; IQR, 8.40-25.72) were found in 1,631 patients with CoV2+ acute infection compared to 2,394 in CoV2- patients (median, 2.35; IQR, 2.0-3.25) (odds ratio [OR], 21.84; 95% CI ,17.53-27.21; P < .001). Among CoV2- patients, 1,484 (62.0%) were assessed for other viral infections, and viral etiology was laboratory confirmed in 428 patients (CoV2- Vir+), with RNA viruses most frequently detected (94.6%). Higher levels of mCD169 were also confirmed in CoV2- Vir+ compared to CoV2- Vir- patients (OR, 10.05; 95% CI, 7.35-13.74; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS mCD169 analysis by rapid flow cytometry assay may be a sensitive broad marker useful for the rapid triage of patients with suspected acute viral infections and could potentially be directly applied to eventual new emergent viral outbreaks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chiara Pratesi
- Clinical Pathology Unit, ASFO "Santa Maria degli Angeli" Hospital of Pordenone, Pordenone, Italy
| | - Rita De Rosa
- Clinical Pathology Unit, ASFO "Santa Maria degli Angeli" Hospital of Pordenone, Pordenone, Italy
| | - Eliana Pivetta
- Clinical Pathology Unit, ASFO "Santa Maria degli Angeli" Hospital of Pordenone, Pordenone, Italy
| | - Kathreena Vattamattathil
- Clinical Pathology Unit, ASFO "Santa Maria degli Angeli" Hospital of Pordenone, Pordenone, Italy
| | - Giacomo Malipiero
- Clinical Pathology Unit, ASFO "Santa Maria degli Angeli" Hospital of Pordenone, Pordenone, Italy
| | - Desré Ethel Fontana
- Clinical Pathology Unit, ASFO "Santa Maria degli Angeli" Hospital of Pordenone, Pordenone, Italy
| | - Giancarlo Basaglia
- Department of Microbiology, Department of Microbiology, ASFO "Santa Maria degli Angeli" Hospital of Pordenone, Pordenone, Italy
| | - Paolo Doretto
- Clinical Pathology Unit, ASFO "Santa Maria degli Angeli" Hospital of Pordenone, Pordenone, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gan SY, Tye GJ, Chew AL, Lai NS. Current development of Fc gamma receptors (FcγRs) in diagnostics: a review. Mol Biol Rep 2024; 51:937. [PMID: 39190190 DOI: 10.1007/s11033-024-09877-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2024] [Accepted: 08/20/2024] [Indexed: 08/28/2024]
Abstract
The ability of the immune system to fight against pathogens relies on the intricate collaboration between antibodies and Fc gamma receptors (FcγRs). These receptors are a group of transmembrane glycoprotein molecules, which can specifically detect and bind to the Fc portion of immunoglobulin G (IgG) molecules. They are distributed on a diverse array of immune cells, forming a strong defence system to eliminate invading threats. FcγRs have gained increasing attention as potential biomarkers for various diseases in recent years due to their ability to reflect immune dysregulation and disease pathogenesis. Increasing lines of evidence have shed new light on the remarkable association of FcγRs polymorphisms with the susceptibility of autoimmune diseases such as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and lupus nephritis. Several studies have also reported the application of FcγR as a novel biomarker for the diagnosis of infection and cancer. Due to the surge in interest and concern regarding the potential of FcγRs as promising diagnostic biomarkers, this review, thereby, serves to provide a comprehensive overview of the structural characteristics, functional roles, and expression patterns of FcγRs, with a particular focus on their evolving role as diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shin Yi Gan
- Institute for Research in Molecular Medicine (INFORMM), Universiti Sains Malaysia, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia
| | - Gee Jun Tye
- Institute for Research in Molecular Medicine (INFORMM), Universiti Sains Malaysia, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia
- Malaysian Institute of Pharmaceuticals and Nutraceuticals, National Institutes of Biotechnology Malaysia, Halaman Bukit Gambir, Gelugor, Penang, 11700, Malaysia
| | - Ai Lan Chew
- Institute for Research in Molecular Medicine (INFORMM), Universiti Sains Malaysia, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia
| | - Ngit Shin Lai
- Institute for Research in Molecular Medicine (INFORMM), Universiti Sains Malaysia, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Jukema BN, de Hond TAP, Kroon M, Maranus AE, Koenderman L, Kaasjager KAH. Point-of-care neutrophil and monocyte surface markers differentiate bacterial from viral infections at the emergency department within 30 min. J Leukoc Biol 2024; 115:714-722. [PMID: 38169315 DOI: 10.1093/jleuko/qiad163] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2023] [Revised: 11/21/2023] [Accepted: 12/12/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Rapid discrimination between viral and bacterial infections in a point-of-care setting will improve clinical outcome. Expression of CD64 on neutrophils (neuCD64) increases during bacterial infections, whereas expression of CD169 on classical monocytes (cmCD169) increases during viral infections. The diagnostic value of automated point-of-care neuCD64 and cmCD169 analysis was assessed for detecting bacterial and viral infections at the emergency department. Additionally, their value as input for machine learning models was studied. A prospective observational cohort study in patients suspected of infection was performed at an emergency department. A fully automated point-of-care flow cytometer measured neuCD64, cmCD169, and additional leukocyte surface markers. Flow cytometry data were gated using the FlowSOM algorithm. Bacterial and viral infections were assessed in standardized clinical care. The sole and combined diagnostic value of the markers was investigated. Clustering based on unsupervised machine learning identified unique patient clusters. Eighty-six patients were included. Thirty-five had a bacterial infection, 30 had a viral infection, and 21 had no infection. neuCD64 was increased in bacterial infections (P < 0.001), with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.73. cmCD169 was higher in virally infected patients (P < 0.001; AUROC 0.79). Multivariate analyses incorporating additional markers increased the AUROC for bacterial and viral infections to 0.86 and 0.93, respectively. The additional clustering identified 4 distinctive patient clusters based on infection type and outcome. Automated neuCD64 and cmCD169 determination can discriminate between bacterial and viral infections. These markers can be determined within 30 min, allowing fast infection diagnostics in the acute clinical setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bernard N Jukema
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht, 3584 CX, The Netherlands
- Centre for Translational Immunology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht, 3584 CX, The Netherlands
| | - Titus A P de Hond
- Department of Internal Medicine and Acute Medicine, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht, 3584 CX, The Netherlands
| | - Martijn Kroon
- Centre for Translational Immunology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht, 3584 CX, The Netherlands
| | - Anna E Maranus
- Centre for Translational Immunology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht, 3584 CX, The Netherlands
| | - Leo Koenderman
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht, 3584 CX, The Netherlands
- Centre for Translational Immunology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht, 3584 CX, The Netherlands
| | - Karin A H Kaasjager
- Department of Internal Medicine and Acute Medicine, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht, 3584 CX, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|