1
|
Lee JS, Li PR, Tsai LH, See LC. Prophylaxis of topical levofloxacin against endophthalmitis after cataract surgery in Taiwan, 2001-2019: an interrupted time series analysis. Int J Clin Pharm 2025; 47:462-470. [PMID: 39692852 DOI: 10.1007/s11096-024-01853-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2024] [Accepted: 12/06/2024] [Indexed: 12/19/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Since May 2007, topical levofloxacin 0.5% ophthalmic solution for prophylaxis of postoperative endophthalmitis (POE) in cataract surgery has been reimbursable in Taiwan. AIM We used the National Health Insurance Research Database to estimate the practice of levofloxacin in cataract surgery from 2001 to 2019 and compared the POE rates before and after the introduction of levofloxacin using interrupted time series (ITS) analysis. METHOD We did propensity score-based stabilized weights (PSSW) for each quarterly cohort and used the Joinpoint Regression Program to determine the significant change time point. RESULTS 1,456,380 patients and 2,208,126 eyes were eligible. The Joinpoint Regression Program revealed a significant change in the second quarter of 2010. Levofloxacin use started from 0% in the second quarter of 2007, and increased to 6.3% and 30.2% in the second quarter of 2010 and the last quarter of 2019. The POE rate (per 1000 eyes) was 3.7 in the first quarter of 2001, reduced to 1.9, 1.7, and 1.4 in the first, second quarters of 2010, and the last quarter of 2019, respectively. ITS reveals a significant but smaller time trend of - 0.0088‰ during 2010Q2-2019 (post-interruption). The r-square between the levofloxacin use and the POE rate was 0.305. The results of ITS and r-square after PSSW are similar to those without PSSW. CONCLUSION Although the POE reduction rate in cataract surgery aligns with the increased use of levofloxacin, the small r-square and low usage implied topical levofloxacin use is not the sole determinant of POE reduction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiahn-Shing Lee
- Department of Ophthalmology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Taoyuan City, Taiwan
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan
| | - Pei-Ru Li
- Department of Public Health, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, 259, Wenhua 1st Rd., Guishan Dist., Taoyuan City, 33302, Taiwan
| | - Li-Hung Tsai
- Department of Nursing, Chang Gung University of Science and Technology, Taoyuan City, Taiwan
| | - Lai-Chu See
- Department of Public Health, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, 259, Wenhua 1st Rd., Guishan Dist., Taoyuan City, 33302, Taiwan.
- Biostatistics Core Laboratory, Molecular Medicine Research Center, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan.
- Division of Rheumatology, Allergy and Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Taoyuan City, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sell K, Rabbani S, Burns J. How is health equity considered in policy evaluations employing quasi-experimental methods? A scoping review and content analysis. Eur J Public Health 2025; 35:42-51. [PMID: 39602551 PMCID: PMC11832135 DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckae188] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2024] Open
Abstract
Public health researchers employ quasi-experimental methods (QEM) to evaluate the effects of policies. Whilst some policies are designed to improve (health) equity, others may intentionally or unintentionally have detrimental effects on disadvantaged populations. We thus sought to investigate how health equity is addressed in policy evaluations which employ QEM. We conducted a content analysis on studies sourced from a scoping review. We drew a random sample of 350 records identified in systematic database searches in Medline, EMBASE, and EconLit (December 2022). Studies that employed QEM labels and examined public policies implemented in the WHO European region were included. We extracted data on study design, policies, and populations; assessed whether outcomes were examined in population sub-groups (as defined by PROGRESS-Plus criteria); and analysed discussion sections for equity-related conclusions. We included 59 studies, of which 39 (66.1%) studies considered health equity-albeit to variable depth. Twenty-five studies were focused exclusively on examining policy outcomes in a disadvantaged population (42.4%), of which 19 studies evaluated policies that targeted disadvantaged groups (e.g. minimum wage, social housing policies). Outcomes were stratified for one or more sub-populations in 22 studies (37.3%), most commonly for gender (n = 15, 25.4%) and a measure of socio-economic status (n = 13, 22%), particularly income and employment. Equity-related results and implications were discussed in 24 studies. While policy evaluations employing QEM have considerable value for informing decision-making in public health and other sectors that influence health, their potential to investigate equity impacts is currently not harnessed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kerstin Sell
- Chair of Public Health and Health Services Research, IBE, Faculty of Medicine, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Pettenkofer School of Public Health, Munich, Germany
| | - Setareh Rabbani
- Chair of Public Health and Health Services Research, IBE, Faculty of Medicine, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Pettenkofer School of Public Health, Munich, Germany
- Professorship of Public Health and Prevention, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jacob Burns
- Professorship of Public Health and Prevention, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Simpson J, Albani V, Kingston A, Bambra C. Closing the life expectancy gap: An ecological study of the factors associated with smaller regional health inequalities in post-reunification Germany. Soc Sci Med 2024; 362:117436. [PMID: 39442260 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117436] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2024] [Revised: 10/17/2024] [Accepted: 10/18/2024] [Indexed: 10/25/2024]
Abstract
Regional health inequalities are rising globally. The case of German reunification offers a unique opportunity to explore how such inequalities can be reduced, or even eliminated: following reunification, a long-standing life expectancy gap between East and West Germany was closed for women and markedly reduced for men in less than 15 years. We used data from official national statistics covering the period 1994-2020 for 15 regions in East and West Germany. Using fixed-effects models with an interaction term for regions in the East, we investigated whether within-region changes in key hypothesised factors (social security expenditure, healthcare improvements, changes in alcohol consumption, and life satisfaction), have had differential impacts on life expectancy at birth and at 65 years. Our results show that increases in social security benefits in the East following reunification has been the most important factor for lowering inequalities between the two parts of Germany: for every 10% increase in social security benefits, life expectancy at birth increased by an additional 1.05 [0.68; 1.41] months for males and by 0.57 [0.18; 0.97] months for females in East relative to West Germany. We find the protective effect of social security benefits also for women at 65 years (additional 0.38 [0.06; 0.70] months) but not for men. Our findings suggest that increasing social security expenditure could be an effective policy tool for reducing health inequalities across regions with different levels of economic development. This provides additional support for the materialist hypothesis and the political economy theory of the root causes of health inequalities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julija Simpson
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Ridley 1 Building, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 4LP, UK.
| | - Viviana Albani
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Ridley 1 Building, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 4LP, UK.
| | - Andrew Kingston
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Biogerontology Building, Campus for Ageing and Vitality, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE4 5PL, UK.
| | - Clare Bambra
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Ridley 1 Building, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 4LP, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Nguyen DT, Donnelly M, Hoang MV, O’Neill C. An investigation into patterns of Alcohol drinking in Scotland after the introduction of minimum unit pricing. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0308218. [PMID: 39088518 PMCID: PMC11293661 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308218] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2024] [Accepted: 07/18/2024] [Indexed: 08/03/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In 2018, Scotland became the second country to implement minimum unit pricing (MUP) for all types of alcoholic beverages. The aim of this study was to examine the effect of the policy. METHOD Three national household-level surveys were used: Scottish Health Surveys (2008-2021), Health Surveys in England (2011-2019), and Northern Ireland Continuous Household Survey (2011-2015). First, a generalized ordered logistic model examined patterns of drinking solely in Scotland from 2008-2021 covering current drinking, drinking categories and the weekly consumption (in alcohol units). Secondly, difference-in-difference (DID) analysis was employed to examine changes in "social drinking" behaviours in Scotland after the announcement in 2012 (2011-2015, Northern Ireland and England as comparators) and after the adoption of the policy in 2018 (England as a comparator, with two timeframes 2016-2019 and 2013-2019). RESULTS Overall, drinking in Scotland began to decline prior to 2012 and dropped further with the enactment of MUP in 2018. In response to MUP, the likelihood of abstention increased along with a slight decrease in the prevalence of heavy drinking. The overall amount of drinking fell by about 8% after 2012 and 12% after 2018 (as compared to 2008-2011 level), with a significant decline seen in moderate drinkers but not of those who drank at hazardous or harmful levels. The DID analyses confirmed the reduction in current drinking in Scotland starting since 2012 and continued post-MUP in 2018. CONCLUSION This study points to the impact of MUP in Scotland with a potential role for 'policy signalling' by the Scottish Government's with a multiple-buy discount ban and MUP's announcement since 2011-2012. Indications of impact include a clear decline in alcohol consumption levels and a small but noteworthy change in prevalence of overall drinking and heavy drinking.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Duyen Thuy Nguyen
- Center for Public Health, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom
- Center for Population Health Sciences, Hanoi University of Public Health, North Tu Liem district, Hanoi, Vietnam
| | - Michael Donnelly
- Center for Public Health, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom
| | - Minh Van Hoang
- Center for Population Health Sciences, Hanoi University of Public Health, North Tu Liem district, Hanoi, Vietnam
| | - Ciaran O’Neill
- Center for Public Health, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Röding D, Walter U, Dreier M. Long-Term Effects of Integrated Strategies of Community Health Promotion on Diabetes Mellitus Mortality: a Natural Policy Experiment Based on Aggregated Longitudinal Secondary Data. J Urban Health 2021; 98:791-800. [PMID: 34799821 PMCID: PMC8688653 DOI: 10.1007/s11524-021-00590-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/08/2021] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
Integrated strategies of community health promotion (ISCHP) are based on intersectoral collaborations using the Health in All Policies approach to address determinants of health. While effects on health determinants have been shown, evidence on the effectiveness of ISCHP on health outcomes is scarce. The aim of this study is to assess the long-term effects of ISCHP on diabetes mellitus mortality (DMM) in German communities. A nonrandomized evaluation based on secondary county-level official data (1998-2016) was performed. In April 2019, 149 communities in Germany with ISCHP out of 401 were identified. Communities with < 5 measurements of DMM, starting before 1999 or after 2015, were excluded. Analyses included 65 communities with ISCHP (IG) and 124 without ISCHP (CG). ISCHP ran for a mean of 5.6 years. Fixed effects (FE) models were used to estimate effects of ISCHP and duration on DMM taking into account the time-varying average age. The FE estimator for DMM is b = - 2.48 (95% CI - 3.45 to - 1.51) for IG vs. CG and b = - 0.30 (95% CI - 0.46 to - 0.14) for ISCHP duration (0-16 years). In the first year of an ISCHP, a reduction of the annual DMM of 0.3 per 100,000 population (1%), and in the 16th year of 4.8 (14%) was achieved. This study provides preliminary evidence of the effectiveness of ISCHP in Germany. Limitations include inaccuracies to classify IG and CG and possible selection bias. Longitudinal county-level data may be an efficient data source to evaluate complex interventions, thereby contributing to further strengthen evidence-based integrated health promotion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dominik Röding
- Hannover Medical School, Institute for Epidemiology, Social Medicine and Health Systems Research, Carl-Neuberg Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
| | - Ulla Walter
- Hannover Medical School, Institute for Epidemiology, Social Medicine and Health Systems Research, Carl-Neuberg Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany
| | - Maren Dreier
- Hannover Medical School, Institute for Epidemiology, Social Medicine and Health Systems Research, Carl-Neuberg Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Schröders J, Dewi FST, Nilsson M, Nichter M, Sebastian MS. Effects of social network diversity in the disablement process: a comparison of causal inference methods and an outcome-wide approach to the Indonesian Family Life Surveys, 2007-2015. Int J Equity Health 2020; 19:128. [PMID: 32736632 PMCID: PMC7393827 DOI: 10.1186/s12939-020-01238-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2019] [Accepted: 07/14/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Social networks (SN) have been proven to be instrumental for healthy aging and function as important safety nets, particular for older adults in low and middle-income countries (LMICs). Despite the importance of interpreting health outcomes in terms of SN, in many LMICs - including Indonesia - epidemiological studies and policy responses on the health effects of SN for aging populations are still uncommon. Using outcome-wide multi-method approaches to longitudinal panel data, this study aims to outline more clearly the role of SN diversity in the aging process in Indonesia. We explore whether and to what degree there is an association of SN diversity with adult health outcomes and investigate potential gender differences, heterogeneous treatment effects, and effect gradients along disablement processes. METHODS Data came from the fourth and fifth waves of the Indonesian Family Life Survey fielded in 2007-08 and 2014-15. The analytic sample consisted of 3060 adults aged 50+ years. The primary exposure variable was the diversity of respondents' SN at baseline. This was measured through a social network index (SNI), conjoining information about household size together with a range of social ties with whom respondents had active contact across six different types of role relationships. Guided by the disablement process model, a battery of 19 outcomes (8 pathologies, 5 impairments, 4 functional limitations, 2 disabilities) were included into analyses. Evidence for causal effects of SN diversity on health was evaluated using outcome-wide multivariable regression adjustment (RA), propensity score matching (PSM), and instrumental variable (IV) analyses. RESULTS At baseline, 60% of respondents had a low SNI. Results from the RA and PSM models showed greatest concordance and that among women a diverse SN was positively associated with pulmonary outcomes and upper and lower body functions. Both men and women with a high SNI reported less limitations in performing activities of daily living (ADL) and instrumental ADL (IADL) tasks. A high SNI was negatively associated with C-reactive protein levels in women. The IV analyses yielded positive associations with cognitive functions for both men and women. CONCLUSIONS Diverse SN confer a wide range of strong and heterogeneous long-term health effects, particularly for older women. In settings with limited formal welfare protection, intervening in the SN of older adults and safeguarding their access to diverse networks can be an investment in population health, with manifold implications for health and public policy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Schröders
- Department of Epidemiology and Global Health, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
| | - Fatwa Sari Tetra Dewi
- Department of Health Behaviour, Environment and Social Medicine, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
| | - Maria Nilsson
- Department of Epidemiology and Global Health, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Mark Nichter
- School of Anthropology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Zinszer K, Caprara A, Lima A, Degroote S, Zahreddine M, Abreu K, Carabali M, Charland K, Dantas MA, Wellington J, Parra B, Fournet F, Bonnet E, Pérez D, Robert E, Dagenais C, Benmarhnia T, Andersson N, Ridde V. Sustainable, healthy cities: protocol of a mixed methods evaluation of a cluster randomized controlled trial for Aedes control in Brazil using a community mobilization approach. Trials 2020; 21:182. [PMID: 32059693 PMCID: PMC7023806 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-019-3714-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2019] [Accepted: 09/09/2019] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Dengue is increasing in its global presence with an estimated 4 billion people at-risk of infection in at least 128 countries. Despite the promising results of EcoHealth and community mobilization approaches to Aedes reduction, more evidence of their efficacy on reducing dengue risk is needed. The principal research question is to determine if interventions based upon community mobilization reduce the risk of dengue virus infection among children 3 to 9 years old compared to usual dengue control practice in Fortaleza, Brazil. Methods The present study will follow a pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial (cRCT) design with randomization at the census tract level with equal allocation to the two arms. In each arm, there will be 34 clusters of 86 children between 3 to 9 years old for an expected total of 5848 children enrolled in the study, assuming a risk reduction of 29.5% based upon findings from a previous multi-site cRCT. The primary outcomes are rates of anti-dengue Immunoglobulin G (IgG) seroconversion and adult female Aedes density. The intervention is based upon a participatory health research approach, Socializing Evidence for Participatory Action (SEPA), where the research evidence is used to foster community engagement and ownership of the health issue and solution. Following allocation, intervention communities will develop and implement their own solutions that will likely include a wide variety of collective events and media approaches. Data collection activities over a period of 3 years include household visits for blood collection, household surveys, and entomological surveys; and qualitative activities including focus groups, in-depth interviews, and document analysis to evaluate the process, acceptability, fidelity, and sustainability of the intervention. Study participants will be aware of their assignment and all research staff will be blinded although the intervention assignment will likely be revealed to field staff through interaction with participants. Discussion The results of our study will provide evidence on community mobilization as an intervention for dengue control. We anticipate that if community mobilization is effective in Fortaleza, the results of this study will help develop evidence-based vector control programs in Brazil, and also in other countries struggling with Aedes-transmitted diseases. Trial registration ISRCTN66131315, registration date: 1 October 2018.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kate Zinszer
- School of Public Health, University of Montreal, Montréal, Québec, Canada. .,Québec Public Health Research Centre, Montréal, Canada. .,Québec Population Health Research Network, Montréal, Canada.
| | - Andrea Caprara
- Québec Population Health Research Network, Montréal, Canada
| | - Antonio Lima
- Fortaleza Municipal Health Secretariat, Fortaleza, Brazil.,University of Fortaleza, Fortaleza, Brazil
| | | | - Monica Zahreddine
- School of Public Health, University of Montreal, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | | | | | - Katia Charland
- School of Public Health, University of Montreal, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | | | | | | | - Florence Fournet
- French Institute for Research on Sustainable Development, Paris, France
| | - Emmanuel Bonnet
- French Institute for Research on Sustainable Development, Paris, France
| | - Denis Pérez
- School of Public Health, University of Montreal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.,Pedro Kourí Tropical Medicine Institute, Havana, Cuba
| | | | - Christian Dagenais
- School of Public Health, University of Montreal, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | | | - Neil Andersson
- McGill University, Montréal, Canada.,Universidad Autonomy De Guerrero, Acapulco, Mexico
| | - Valéry Ridde
- French Institute for Research on Sustainable Development, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
de Jonge HC, Lagendijk J, Saha U, Been JV, Burdorf A. Did an urban perinatal health programme in Rotterdam, the Netherlands, reduce adverse perinatal outcomes? Register-based retrospective cohort study. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e031357. [PMID: 31641003 PMCID: PMC6830581 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031357] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To study the effect of an urban perinatal health programme in Rotterdam, the Netherlands, on perinatal outcomes. DESIGN A retrospective cohort study with difference-in-differences analysis using individual-level perinatal outcome data from the Dutch Perinatal Registry 2003-2014 linked to Central Bureau of Statistics data of migration background and individual disposable household income. INTERVENTION The programme consisted of perinatal health promotion, risk selection and risk-guided pregnancy care, and a new primary care child birth centre. The programme was implemented during 2009-2012. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES We compared trends in perinatal mortality, preterm delivery and small-for-gestational-age births between targeted urban neighbourhoods in Rotterdam (n=61 415) and all other urban neighbourhoods in the Netherlands (n=881 202). The effect of the programme was modelled as a change in trend of each perinatal outcome in the treatment group post intervention compared with the control population from January 2010 onwards. All analyses were adjusted for maternal age, parity, ethnicity and individual-level low socioeconomic status (SES). We also conducted a stratified analysis by SES. RESULTS During 2003-2014, downward trends in perinatal mortality (adjusted OR (aOR) 0.9439 per year, 95% CI 0.9362 to 0.9517), preterm birth (aOR 0.9970 per year, 95% CI 0.9944 to 0.9997) and small-for-gestational-age births (aOR 0.9809 per year, 95% CI 0.9787 to 0.9831) in the entire study population were observed. No demonstrable changes in these trends were found in the intervention group after the programme had started. The stratified analyses by SES showed no changes in trends post intervention in both strata either. CONCLUSIONS The programme had no demonstrable effects on perinatal outcomes. The intervention may not have reached a sufficient proportion of the population or has provided too little contrast to the widespread attention for inequalities in pregnancy outcomes occurring simultaneously in the Netherlands.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jacqueline Lagendijk
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Unnati Saha
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jasper V Been
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Paediatrics, Erasmus University Medical Centre-Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Alex Burdorf
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Su D, Chen Y, Gao H, Li H, Chang J, Lei S, Jiang D, Hu X, Tan M, Chen Z. Is There a Difference in the Utilisation of Inpatient Services Between Two Typical Payment Methods of Health Insurance? Evidence from the New Rural Cooperative Medical Scheme in China. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2019; 16:ijerph16081410. [PMID: 31010133 PMCID: PMC6518194 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16081410] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2019] [Revised: 04/15/2019] [Accepted: 04/18/2019] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the effects of the differences between two typical payment methods for the new rural cooperative medical scheme (NRCMS) in China on the utilisation of inpatient services. Interrupted time-series analysis (ITSA) and propensity score matching (PSM) were used to measure the difference between two typical payment methods for the NRCMS with regard to the utilisation of inpatient services. After the reform was formally implemented, the level and slope difference after reform compared with pre-intervention (distribution of inpatients in county hospitals (DIC), distribution of inpatients in township hospitals (DIT) and the actual compensation ratio of inpatients (ARCI)) were not statistically significant. Kernel matching obtained better results in reducing the mean and median of the absolute standardised bias of covariates of appropriateness of admission (AA), appropriateness of disease (AD). The difference in AA and AD of the matched inpatients between two groups was −0.03 (p-value = 0.042, 95% CI: −0.08 to 0.02) and 0.21 (p-value < 0.001, 95% CI: −0.17 to 0.25), respectively. The differences in the utilisation of inpatient services may arise owing to the system designs of different payment methods for NRCMS in China. The causes of these differences can be used to guide inpatients to better use medical services, through the transformation and integration of payment systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dai Su
- School of Medicine and Health Management, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China.
- Research Center for Rural Health Services, Hubei Province Key Research Institute of Humanities and Social Sciences, Wuhan 430030, China.
| | - Yingchun Chen
- School of Medicine and Health Management, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China.
- Research Center for Rural Health Services, Hubei Province Key Research Institute of Humanities and Social Sciences, Wuhan 430030, China.
| | - Hongxia Gao
- School of Medicine and Health Management, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China.
- Research Center for Rural Health Services, Hubei Province Key Research Institute of Humanities and Social Sciences, Wuhan 430030, China.
| | - Haomiao Li
- School of Medicine and Health Management, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China.
- Research Center for Rural Health Services, Hubei Province Key Research Institute of Humanities and Social Sciences, Wuhan 430030, China.
| | - Jingjing Chang
- School of Medicine and Health Management, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China.
- Research Center for Rural Health Services, Hubei Province Key Research Institute of Humanities and Social Sciences, Wuhan 430030, China.
| | - Shihan Lei
- School of Medicine and Health Management, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China.
- Research Center for Rural Health Services, Hubei Province Key Research Institute of Humanities and Social Sciences, Wuhan 430030, China.
| | - Di Jiang
- School of Medicine and Health Management, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China.
- Research Center for Rural Health Services, Hubei Province Key Research Institute of Humanities and Social Sciences, Wuhan 430030, China.
| | - Xiaomei Hu
- School of Medicine and Health Management, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China.
- Research Center for Rural Health Services, Hubei Province Key Research Institute of Humanities and Social Sciences, Wuhan 430030, China.
| | - Min Tan
- School of Medicine and Health Management, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China.
- Research Center for Rural Health Services, Hubei Province Key Research Institute of Humanities and Social Sciences, Wuhan 430030, China.
| | - Zhifang Chen
- School of Medicine and Health Management, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China.
- Research Center for Rural Health Services, Hubei Province Key Research Institute of Humanities and Social Sciences, Wuhan 430030, China.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Abstract
Social epidemiology seeks to describe and quantify the causal effects of social institutions, interactions, and structures on human health. To accomplish this task, we define exposures as treatments and posit populations exposed or unexposed to these well-defined regimens. This inferential structure allows us to unambiguously estimate and interpret quantitative causal parameters and to investigate how these may be affected by biases such as confounding. This paradigm has been challenged recently by some critics who favor broadening the exposures that may be studied beyond treatments to also consider states. Defining the exposure protocol of an observational study is a continuum of specificity, and one may choose to loosen this definition, incurring the cost of causal parameters that become commensurately more vague. The advantages and disadvantages of broader versus narrower definitions of exposure are matters of continuing debate in social epidemiology as in other branches of epidemiology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jay S. Kaufman
- Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec H3A 1A2, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Su D, Chen YC, Gao HX, Li HM, Chang JJ, Jiang D, Hu XM, Lei SH, Tan M, Chen ZF. Effect of integrated urban and rural residents medical insurance on the utilisation of medical services by residents in China: a propensity score matching with difference-in-differences regression approach. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e026408. [PMID: 30782944 PMCID: PMC6377539 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026408] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES In this study, we aim to evaluate the effect of urban and rural resident medical insurance scheme (URRMI) on the utilisation of medical services by urban and rural residents in the four pilot provinces. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS The sample used in this study is 13 305 individuals, including 2620 in the treatment group and 10 685 in the control group, from the 2011 and 2015 surveys of China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study. OUTCOME MEASURES Propensity score matching and difference-in-differences regression approach (PSM-DID) is used in the study. First, we match the baseline data by using kernel matching. Then, the average treatment effect of the four outcome variables are analysed by using the DID model. Finally, the robustness of the PSM-DID estimation is tested by simple model and radius matching. RESULTS Kernel matching have improved the overall balance after matching. The URRMI policy has significantly reduced the need-but-not outpatient care and significantly increased outpatient care cost and inpatient care cost for rural residents, with DID value of -0.271, 0.090 and 0.256, respectively. After robustness test, the DID competing results of four outcome variables are consistent. CONCLUSIONS URRMI has a limited effect on the utilisation of medical and health services by all residents, but the effect on rural residents is obvious. The government should establish a unified or income-matching payment standard to prevent, control the use of medical insurance funds and increase its efforts to implement URRMI integration in more regions to improve overall fundraising levels.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dai Su
- Department of Health Management, School of Medicine and Health Management, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
- Research Center for Rural Health Services, Hubei Province Key Research Institute of Humanities and Social Sciences, Wuhan, China
| | - Ying-chun Chen
- Department of Health Management, School of Medicine and Health Management, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
- Research Center for Rural Health Services, Hubei Province Key Research Institute of Humanities and Social Sciences, Wuhan, China
| | - Hong-xia Gao
- Department of Health Management, School of Medicine and Health Management, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
- Research Center for Rural Health Services, Hubei Province Key Research Institute of Humanities and Social Sciences, Wuhan, China
| | - Hao-miao Li
- Department of Health Management, School of Medicine and Health Management, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
- Research Center for Rural Health Services, Hubei Province Key Research Institute of Humanities and Social Sciences, Wuhan, China
| | - Jing-jing Chang
- Department of Health Management, School of Medicine and Health Management, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
- Research Center for Rural Health Services, Hubei Province Key Research Institute of Humanities and Social Sciences, Wuhan, China
| | - Di Jiang
- Department of Health Management, School of Medicine and Health Management, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
- Research Center for Rural Health Services, Hubei Province Key Research Institute of Humanities and Social Sciences, Wuhan, China
| | - Xiao-mei Hu
- Department of Health Management, School of Medicine and Health Management, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
- Research Center for Rural Health Services, Hubei Province Key Research Institute of Humanities and Social Sciences, Wuhan, China
| | - Shi-han Lei
- Department of Health Management, School of Medicine and Health Management, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
- Research Center for Rural Health Services, Hubei Province Key Research Institute of Humanities and Social Sciences, Wuhan, China
| | - Min Tan
- Department of Health Management, School of Medicine and Health Management, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
- Research Center for Rural Health Services, Hubei Province Key Research Institute of Humanities and Social Sciences, Wuhan, China
| | - Zhi-fang Chen
- Department of Health Management, School of Medicine and Health Management, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
- Research Center for Rural Health Services, Hubei Province Key Research Institute of Humanities and Social Sciences, Wuhan, China
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Nanninga S, Lehne G, Ratz T, Bolte G. Impact of Public Smoking Bans on Social Inequalities in Children’s Exposure to Tobacco Smoke at Home: An Equity-Focused Systematic Review. Nicotine Tob Res 2018; 21:1462-1472. [DOI: 10.1093/ntr/nty139] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2017] [Accepted: 07/04/2018] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction
A systematic review was conducted to evaluate the impact of public smoking bans on social inequalities in children’s secondhand smoke (SHS) exposure at home.
Methods
Five databases were electronically searched for articles on children’s SHS exposure at home related to public smoking bans. In addition, the gray literature and German public health journals were considered. Search was restricted to English and German publications. Of 3037 records screened, 25 studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria by either measuring SHS exposure before and after public smoking ban introduction or by comparing exposure between regions with and without smoke-free legislation. Studies were further examined whether they additionally reported on impacts on social inequalities in SHS exposure. Information on children’s SHS exposure at home in relation to smoke-free legislation were extracted by one reviewer and checked for accuracy by a second reviewer. According to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses-Equity (PRISMA-E) guidelines for equity-focused systematic reviews, the PROGRESS-Plus framework was applied to data extraction and analysis with focus on social inequalities in SHS exposure. Results were visualized by a harvest plot.
Results
Eight studies gave results on the impact of public smoking bans on social inequalities in children’s SHS exposure. Whereas only one study indicated widening of the social gap in exposure, seven studies showed no impact or a reduction of social inequalities in exposure.
Conclusions
First evidence on short-term impact of public smoking bans does not support the assumption of intervention-generated inequalities in children’s SHS exposure at home. Future studies should focus on long-term equity impacts of smoke-free legislation.
Implications
There are substantial social inequalities in children’s SHS exposure in many countries. Both hypotheses on the effect of smoke-free legislation on children’s SHS exposure at home, the displacement hypothesis and the social diffusion hypothesis, did not take social inequalities into account. Up to now, only few studies analyzed the effects of smoke-free legislation on social inequalities in children’s SHS exposure at home. Public smoking bans had overall no negative impact on social inequalities in children’s SHS exposure at home. More consistent reporting of absolute and relative inequalities is needed to comprehensively assess equity impact of smoke-free legislation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Nanninga
- Department of Social Epidemiology, Institute of Public Health and Nursing Research, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany
- Health Sciences Bremen, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany
| | - Gesa Lehne
- Department of Social Epidemiology, Institute of Public Health and Nursing Research, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany
- Health Sciences Bremen, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany
| | - Tiara Ratz
- Department of Social Epidemiology, Institute of Public Health and Nursing Research, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany
- Health Sciences Bremen, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany
| | - Gabriele Bolte
- Department of Social Epidemiology, Institute of Public Health and Nursing Research, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany
- Health Sciences Bremen, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Lee J, Schram A, Riley E, Harris P, Baum F, Fisher M, Freeman T, Friel S. Addressing Health Equity Through Action on the Social Determinants of Health: A Global Review of Policy Outcome Evaluation Methods. Int J Health Policy Manag 2018; 7:581-592. [PMID: 29996578 PMCID: PMC6037500 DOI: 10.15171/ijhpm.2018.04] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2017] [Accepted: 01/13/2018] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Epidemiological evidence on the social determinants of health inequity is well-advanced, but considerably less attention has been given to evaluating the impact of public policies addressing those social determinants. Methodological challenges to produce evidence on policy outcomes present a significant barrier to mobilising policy actions for health equities. This review aims to examine methodological approaches to policy evaluation of health equity outcomes and identify promising approaches for future research.
Methods: We conducted a systematic narrative review of literature critically evaluating policy impact on health equity, synthesizing information on the methodological approaches used. We searched and screened records from five electronic databases, using pre-defined protocols resulting in a total of 50 studies included for review. We coded the studies according to (1) type of policy analysed; (2) research design; (3) analytical techniques; (4) health outcomes; and (5) equity dimensions evaluated.
Results: We found a growing number of a wide range of policies being evaluated for health equity outcomes using a variety of research designs. The majority of studies employed an observational research design, most of which were cross-sectional, however, other approaches included experimental designs, simulation modelling, and meta-analysis. Regression techniques dominated the analytical approaches, although a number of novel techniques were used which may offer advantages over traditional regression analysis for the study of distributional impacts of policy. Few studies made intra-national or cross-national comparisons or collected primary data. Despite longstanding challenges of attribution in policy outcome evaluation, the majority of the studies attributed change in physical or mental health outcomes to the policy being evaluated.
Conclusion: Our review provides an overview of methodological approaches to health equity policy outcome evaluation, demonstrating what is most commonplace and opportunities from novel approaches. We found the number of studies evaluating the impacts of public policies on health equity are on the rise, but this area of policy evaluation still requires more attention given growing inequities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janice Lee
- School of Regulation and Global Governance (RegNet), College of Asia and the Pacific, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia
| | - Ashley Schram
- School of Regulation and Global Governance (RegNet), College of Asia and the Pacific, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia
| | - Emily Riley
- Menzies Centre for Health Policy, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Patrick Harris
- Menzies Centre for Health Policy, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Fran Baum
- Southgate Institute of Health, Society and Equity, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Matt Fisher
- Southgate Institute of Health, Society and Equity, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Toby Freeman
- Southgate Institute of Health, Society and Equity, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Sharon Friel
- School of Regulation and Global Governance (RegNet), College of Asia and the Pacific, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia
| |
Collapse
|