Real-world clinical effectiveness and safety of vedolizumab and anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha treatment in ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease patients: a German retrospective chart review

Tumour necrosis factor inhibitors in Ulcerative colitis: real-world data on Therapeutic drug monitoring and evaluation of current treatment targets (STRIDE II)

BACKGROUND

The benefit of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) and implementation of recommendations from the Selection of Therapeutic Targets in Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD, STRIDE) are discussed in the IBD community. We report real-world data in ulcerative colitis patients receiving first-line tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) treatment followed by TDM, and assess how implementation of the STRIDE II recommendations might affect clinical practice.

METHODS

Adult, biologically naïve UC patients starting TNFi between 2014 and 2021 at Oslo University Hospital were included in a medical chart review study, and data were collected at three and twelve months after the start of treatment. Target serum drug levels were defined as ≥7.5 mg/L for adalimumab and ≥5 mg/L for infliximab.

RESULTS

Of 141 included patients, 36% were in clinical and biochemical (combined) remission after twelve months. Among 102 treatment persistent patients, 54% were in combined remission after twelve months. Target drug level at three months was associated with clinical remission at twelve months (OR = 2.97, 95% CI [1.24-7.12]) and biochemical remission at twelve months (OR = 2.64, 95% CI [1.03-6.77]). In total, 56% of recorded dosage adjustments were related only to serum drug levels.

CONCLUSIONS

Combined remission rates at twelve months for treatment persistent patients suggest that 46% should have been considered for a change of treatment according to the STRIDE II recommendations. A majority of dosage adjustments were made proactively. Target drug level at three months was associated with remission at twelve months and supports the use of proactive TDM.

Clinical effectiveness and safety of vedolizumab versus infliximab in biologic-naïve patients with ulcerative colitis: A comparative real-world multicentric observational study

OBJECTIVE

Vedolizumab (VDZ) and infliximab (IFX) are first-line therapies for moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis (UC). Despite their widespread use, there are no direct comparative studies, and real-world data, particularly in Latin America, are limited. This study compared the effectiveness and safety of VDZ and IFX in biologic-naïve UC patients.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included patients with moderate-to-severe UC (Mayo score 6-12, endoscopic sub-score ≥2) treated with VDZ or IFX. Primary endpoints were clinical remission (partial Mayo score ≤2), endoscopic remission (Mayo sub-score=0), and steroid-free clinical remission at week 52. Secondary endpoints included clinical response, endoscopic response, biological therapy optimization, adverse events (AEs), hospitalizations, and biochemical remission at week 52. Propensity score adjustment (1/PS) was used to adjust for potential confounders.

RESULTS

A total of 297 UC patients (156 IFX, 141 VDZ) were analyzed. Clinical remission at week 52 was 82.3% for VDZ and 77.6% for IFX (p=0.11), while endoscopic remission was higher in VDZ patients (47.4% vs. 33.1%, p=0.03). Steroid-free clinical remission rates were similar between groups (p=0.98). Endoscopic response at week 52 favored VDZ (78.4% vs. 62.7%, p<0.001), and VDZ had higher treatment persistence (80.8% vs. 61.8%, p<0.001). AEs and hospitalizations were more frequent in IFX patients (p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Both VDZ and IFX are effective in biologic-naïve UC patients, however VDZ demonstrated superior endoscopic outcomes, higher treatment persistence, and a better safety profile, supporting its use as a first-line therapy.

The effectiveness of vedolizumab in advanced therapy-experienced ulcerative colitis patients: Real world data from the Inflammatory Bowel Disease of the Middle East (IBD-ME) Registry group

BACKGROUND

Vedolizumab is an approved ulcerative colitis (UC) treatment. Multiple large randomized clinical trials have demonstrated the drug's efficacy and safety. However, real-world data from Middle Eastern countries are spare. The study aims to evaluate the clinical efficacy of vedolizumab (VDZ) therapy in advanced therapy experienced UC patients.

METHODS

A retrospective electronic chart review of a cohort study of 153 moderately to severely active UC patients who failed or were intolerant to TNF antagonists and received vedolizumab from two large tertiary care centers was performed. Rates of clinical response and remission were retrospectively evaluated at 3,6, and 12 months post VDZ therapy using Patient Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index (P-SCCAI); clinical response was defined as a decrease in P-SCCAI ≥3, and clinical remission was defined as a P-SCCAI score of ≤3 points. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify predictors of response to vedolizumab.

RESULTS

A total of 153 UC patients had sufficient data for analysis. Clinical remission rates were 61.9% for patients on vedolizumab every 8 weeks and 89.3% for those receiving every 4 (Q4) weeks dosing. A significant reduction in CRP and improvement of albumin post vedolizumab treatment were observed, and corticosteroids were stopped in most patients. In a multiple logistic regression analysis, several factors were found to influence the clinical effectiveness of VDZ in inducing remission. Female gender was associated with a higher likelihood of remission [OR =3.09, 95% CI = (1.05-9.13), P = 0.04]. Conversely, a greater number of biologics used prior to VDZ treatment was associated with a lower likelihood of remission [OR =0.418, 95% CI = (0.203-0.859), P = 0.017]. Patients with extensive disease (E3) had an increased likelihood of remission [OR =3.81, 95% CI = (1.32-10.97), P = 0.0129]. Additionally, a VDZ dosing frequency of Q4 weeks was associated with a significantly higher likelihood of remission [OR =6.08, 95% CI = (1.73-21.39), P = 0.0049]. No significant safety signals were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

In this current real-world study, vedolizumab effectively achieved clinical response and remission in most advanced therapy experienced UC patients treated for up to 12 months. Future studies with larger sample sizes and more robust study designs should be conducted to further validate the results of this study.

Sishen pills inhibit inflammatory dendritic cell differentiation via miR-505-3p mediated E-cadherin downregulation in ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is an autoimmune disease that is highly susceptible to recurrence, which is still a lack of effective drugs with minor side effects in clinic. Intervention of inflammatory differentiation of dendritic cells (DCs) might be an effective strategy to treat UC. Sishen Pills (SSP) is a classic Chinese herbal formula which has been demonstrated the protective effect of UC, but the mechanism remains unclear.

PURPOSE

To elucidate the protective effects of SSP against UC in mice and reveal its regulatory mechanism of DCs and the key active ingredients for the UC treatment based on transcriptomics, network pharmacology and experiments validation in vivo and vitro.

METHOD

The key active ingredients of SSP were detected and screened integrating LC-MS/MS and network pharmacology. A mouse UC model was induced with 3% sodium dextran sulfate and treated with SSP for 14 days to evaluate the efficacy. ELISA was used to detect the levels of IL-6, IL-1β and TNF-α in the colon; flow cytometry was used to detect the expression levels of DCs and their subpopulations; whole transcriptomic sequencing of differential RNAs in the colon and RT-PCR to detect key miRNAs to verify the sequencing results. Mouse bone marrow-derived dendritic cells (BMDCs) were isolated, an inflammatory model was constructed using 100 ng/ml LPS, and the effects of SSP on DC proliferation and apoptosis and their surface co-stimulatory molecule expression were examined; IL-6, IL-1β, TNF-α levels were measured by ELISA; RT-PCR and WB were performed to detect miR-505-3p, CDH1, E-cadherin expression. BMDCs with low expression of miR-505-3p were constructed by lentiviral transfection for further validation. The potential key ingredient was re-validated in vivo and vitro experiment.

RESULTS

Animal experiments showed that SSP alleviated DSS-induced UC symptoms and colonic pathological injury in mice, and inhibited IL-6, IL-1β, TNF-α secretion and inflammatory DC proliferation and activation maturation. Network pharmacology predicted that evodiamine, isobavachalcone, curcumin, and engenol may play a key role in SSP. RNA sequencing revealed that miR-505-3p, as the differential miRNA, shared a large number of transcription factors with E-cadherin, and was involved in inflammatory differentiation regulation. In vivo experiments confirmed that SSP accelerated apoptosis, slowed down proliferation, inhibited inflammatory differentiation and IL-6, IL-1β, and TNF-α secretion in BMDCs, and decreased miR-505-3p, CDH1, and E-cadherin levels. After knocking down miR-505-3p, SSP could not regulate the inflammatory differentiation and IL-6, IL-1β, TNF-α level in BMDCs. Additionally, evodiamine was found and verified to be the key active ingredient of SSP in preventing the inflammatory differatiation of DCs.

CONCLUSION

SSP prevented the inflammatory differentiation of DCs by downregulating the expression of miR-505-3p, in which Evodiamine may played a key role.

Effectiveness and safety outcomes after long-term (54 weeks) vedolizumab therapy for Crohn's disease: a prospective, real-world observational study including patient-reported outcomes (POLONEZ II)

BACKGROUND

The Crohn's Disease (CD) Activity Index (CDAI), Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) Questionnaire (IBDQ), and IBD-Fatigue (IBD-F) scale are useful patient-reported outcome (PRO) tools for assessing the treatment benefits of vedolizumab (VDZ) beyond clinical trial endpoints in patients with CD.

OBJECTIVES

To assess clinical response, clinical remission, steroid-free remission, changes from baseline for PROs, and safety in a real-world cohort of patients with moderate-to-severe active CD treated with VDZ.

DESIGN

POLONEZ II was a multicenter, observational, prospective study across 10 Polish centers from April 2020 to October 2023 for 54 weeks in patients with CD eligible for reimbursed VDZ.

METHODS

Primary endpoints at week 54 (W54) were clinical response (⩾70-point reduction in CDAI and >25% reduction vs baseline), remission (CDAI score ⩽150), and steroid-free remission. Other outcomes were changes in PROs (CDAI score and health-related quality of life) and safety. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Of 98 patients with CD, the mean age was 35.2 years, 57.1% were male, and 72.4% had an ileocolonic disease. At W54 (n = 98), 63.3% of patients achieved clinical response, 48.0% remission, and 36.0% steroid-free remission. The durability of clinical response, remission, and steroid-free remission (W14-W54) were 68.9%, 62.9%, and 57.1%, respectively. By W54, a significant reduction in the PROs, such as the total CDAI score (p < 0.001), stool frequency (p < 0.001), abdominal pain score (p < 0.001), IBDQ (p < 0.001), IBD-F (p < 0.05), and fatigue impact on daily activities (p < 0.001), was observed. During VDZ treatment, arthralgia (23.7%-8.7%) and anemia (22.6%-15.9%) decreased between baseline and W54. Non-serious adverse events (SAEs; 12.2%), SAEs (7.1%), and VDZ-related rash (1.0%) were reported. Mean CD-related hospitalization duration decreased from baseline (10.2 days) to the end of the study (5.3 days).

CONCLUSION

POLONEZ II demonstrated long-term real-world benefits of VDZ toward effectiveness, safety, and improved PROs and patients' quality of life.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ENCePP (EUPAS32716).

Evaluation of adverse clinical outcomes in patients with inflammatory bowel disease receiving different sequences of first- and second-line biologic treatments: findings from ROTARY

BACKGROUND

Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are at risk of developing dysplasia and, subsequently, colorectal cancer (CRC) owing to chronic inflammation. Patients may also experience other severe disease complications, such as hospitalization and surgery. Several biologics are available for the treatment of patients with IBD and some patients require multiple lines of treatment owing to loss of response or tolerability to their prescribed biologic. Previous studies suggest that the choice of initial biologic treatment may impact the outcomes of later treatment lines. In this study, we assessed adverse clinical outcomes in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC) who received different biologic treatment sequences.

METHODS

ROTARY part B was a retrospective cohort study using the Optum® Clinical Database that evaluated the incidences of IBD-related hospitalization, IBD-related surgery, dysplasia, CRC, and infections in patients with CD or UC who received two biologics successively. First-line biologics included adalimumab, infliximab, ustekinumab (CD only), and vedolizumab; second-line biologics included infliximab and adalimumab.

RESULTS

In patients with CD, the treatment sequence of ustekinumab to infliximab was associated with the highest overall incidences of hospitalization (51.9%), surgery (40.7%), CRC (3.7%), and infection (37.0%). Vedolizumab followed by an anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (anti-TNFα) treatment was associated with a significantly lower risk of experiencing an adverse medical event (hospitalization, surgery, or infection) than two successive anti-TNFα treatments (odds ratio, 1.526; 95% confidence interval, 1.004-2.320; P < 0.05). In patients with UC, the treatment sequence of vedolizumab to adalimumab resulted in the lowest overall incidence of adverse outcomes (20.3%, 6.3%, 0.0%, 6.3%, and 4.7% for hospitalization, surgery, CRC, dysplasia, and infection, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

We describe differences in adverse clinical outcomes associated with sequencing of biologics in patients with CD or UC and demonstrate favorable results in patients who received vedolizumab as a first-line biologic. These results provide potential guidance to clinicians choosing sequences of biologic treatments in patients with IBD.

Short-term efficacy of vedolizumab in patients with inflammatory bowel disease in real-life settings in Bosnia and Herzegovina

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), encompassing Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), necessitates effective management strategies. This study aims to evaluate the real-world efficacy of vedolizumab, a newer biological therapy, in treating IBD in Bosnia and Herzegovina. A retrospective observational study was conducted across six medical centers, involving 139 IBD patients, 76 with UC and 63 with CD. Patients were assessed for clinical remission and other outcomes at the 26-week mark post vedolizumab treatment initiation. At 26 weeks, clinical remission was achieved in 82.9% of UC patients and 85.7% of CD patients. Mucosal healing was observed in 38.1% of CD patients. The efficacy of vedolizumab did not significantly differ based on prior anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) exposure. Notably, the clinical scoring tools for predicting vedolizumab response showed limited applicability in this cohort. Vedolizumab demonstrated high efficacy in treating both UC and CD in real-world settings in Bosnia and Herzegovina, underscoring its potential as a significant therapeutic option in IBD management.

Real-world effectiveness and safety of advanced therapies for the treatment of moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis: Evidence from a systematic literature review

BACKGROUND

Effectiveness and safety of advanced therapies for ulcerative colitis (UC) warrant assessment in the real world.

OBJECTIVE

To perform a systematic review and summarize real-world evidence of advanced therapies approved for moderate-to-severe UC.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was conducted using real-world studies of biologics or small molecules in UC using Embase, MEDLINE, and MEDLINE-In Process databases. Only products approved in any jurisdiction during the search were included. English-language full-papers (January 2005 to February 2022) and congress abstracts (January 2019 to February 2022) were included. Studies with less than 30 patients or only biologic-naive patients were excluded.

RESULTS

A total of 139 studies were included out of 3,930 identified articles (75%, published between 2019 and 2022; 64%, retrospective observational; 53%, from 5 countries [Italy, United States, Spain, United Kingdom, and Belgium]). Most studies were single agent (highest: vedolizumab = 50, tofacitinib = 24, and adalimumab = 18), and rates of clinical remission (CR) and adverse events varied widely. From the published comparative effectiveness studies (16), the rates of CR were numerically higher with vedolizumab vs anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α agents. Compared with vedolizumab, the effectiveness of tofacitinib was numerically greater in CR (occasionally significant). Rates of steroid-free CR were comparable between ustekinumab and tofacitinib. Infliximab was the most effective anti-TNFα agent, as reported by 2 studies. Remarkably, adverse events were similar across therapies in comparative studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Vedolizumab and tofacitinib were the most assessed therapies. In comparative studies, remission rates were numerically higher with tofacitinib vs vedolizumab and for vedolizumab vs anti-TNFα. Tofacitinib was comparable with ustekinumab for steroid-free CR. Safety was comparable across therapies. Future studies should explore the literature gaps identified, including limited comparative studies with small sample sizes, variations in study designs and patient characteristics, varied definitions of CR, and limited use of patient-reported outcome measures in real-world settings.

Biological Agents in the Treatment of Crohn's Disease: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis From the Prospective Persistence Australian National IBD Cohort (PANIC3) Study

INTRODUCTION

Comparative effectiveness research provides data on the relative benefits and risks between treatments. In Crohn's disease (CD), however, there are few head-to-head studies comparing advanced therapies and none with long-term follow-up. Real-world effectiveness, defined by treatment persistence, obtained from prospective population-based patient cohorts, may help determine the best sequencing and positioning of biological agents.

METHODS

We analyzed the prospectively collected population-based Australian national Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme dispensing data registry (2005-2019) for CD. There is no mandated biological agent prescribing order, and all citizens and permanent residents are eligible for treatment irrespective of insurance status. Propensity score matching was performed to reduce selection bias.

RESULTS

There were 2,029 lines of therapy in 1,446 patients (median age 43 years, interquartile range 34-58, 44% male patients) over the 15-year period with 5,618 patient-years of follow-up. Per line of therapy, 915/2,029 (45.1%) patients used adalimumab, 722/2,029 (35.6%) used infliximab, 155/2,029 (7.6%) used vedolizumab, and 237/2,029 (11.7%) used ustekinumab. When used in biological agent-naive patients, there was no difference in persistence between any agent ( P > 0.05). Used after first line in biological agent-experienced CD, ustekinumab had significantly better persistence than non-ustekinumab biological agents ( P = 0.0018), vs anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) alpha therapy ( P = 0.006) or vedolizumab ( P < 0.001). Ustekinumab persistence was unaffected by prior biological agent exposure ( P = 0.51). After anti-TNF use, ustekinumab had superior persistence to an alternative anti-TNF agent ( P = 0.033) and to vedolizumab ( P = 0.026). Using a propensity score-matched analysis adjusted for age, immunomodulator use, and bio-exposed status, ustekinumab had superior persistence to anti-TNF ( P = 0.01). Multivariate predictors of worse persistence were the use of a non-ustekinumab biological agent (adjusted hazard ratio 2.10, P < 0.001), and bio-experienced status (adjusted hazard ratio 1.23, P < 0.001).

DISCUSSION

This large national prospective database with nonhierarchical prescribing of biological agents did not identify superior persistence of any agent in bio-naive CD. However, for patients with bio-experienced CD, persistence was greater with ustekinumab.

Acute interstitial nephritis in patients with inflammatory bowel disease treated with vedolizumab: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Acute interstitial nephritis (AIN) is a complication of drugs that may cause permanent kidney injury. AIN has been reported in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) treated with the integrin inhibitor vedolizumab. Through systematic review of existing literature, we aimed to identify and describe cases of AIN in patients with IBD treated with vedolizumab.

METHODS

We searched Medline, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science Core Collection between 1 January 2009 and 25 April 2023. The search yielded 1473 publications. Titles and abstracts were screened by two independent reviewers. Seventy publications were reviewed in full-text. Eight met the inclusion criteria. Clinical characteristics of AIN cases were extracted. Case causality assessment was performed according to two international adverse drug reaction probability assessment scales. Results were reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.

RESULTS

Nine biopsy-confirmed cases of AIN were reported in six patients with ulcerative colitis and three with Crohn's disease. Mean age at AIN onset was 36 years (range = 19-58) and the majority of patients were females (n = 6/9). Time from vedolizumab treatment initiation to AIN onset spanned from hours to 12 months. Common symptoms were fever and malaise. Creatinine levels were elevated in all patients. Five patients sustained permanent kidney injury.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that vedolizumab, although rarely, could cause AIN in patients with IBD. Awareness of laboratory findings and symptoms consistent with AIN, along with monitoring of the kidney function, could be warranted in patients with IBD treated with vedolizumab.

Real-life treatment persistence and treatment outcomes of Finnish patients with inflammatory bowel disease receiving vedolizumab as first-line biological treatment

Purpose

To analyze treatment persistence and treatment outcomes of vedolizumab as first-line biological treatment in Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) patients in a Finnish real-world setting.

Methods

Observational, retrospective, multi-center chart review study that included adult CD and UC patients initiating vedolizumab as first-line biological treatment between 2014 and 2020.

Results

The cohort consisted of 54 CD and 69 UC patients. At month 12, treatment persistence was 84.9 % in CD and 64.7 % in UC. Most vedolizumab discontinuations (CD, n = 11; UC, n = 26) were due to inefficacy. Discontinuations due to adverse events were rare (n < 5). Efficacy improvements were observed in treatment persistent patients at 12 months vs. baseline in the Harvey-Bradshaw Index (CD, 1.8 vs. 3.9, p = 0.001), Partial Mayo Score (UC, 1.0 vs. 4.9, p < 0.001), Physician's Global Assessment (CD, 0.9 vs. 1.8, p < 0.001; UC, 0.4 vs. 2.1, p < 0.001), along with positive endoscopic and biochemical outcomes. Clinical remission was 90.9 % vs. 63.0 % for CD, and 81.6 % vs. 12.3 % for UC, while corticosteroid use was 15.9 % vs. 53.7 % for CD, and 14.6 % vs. 92.8 % for UC at 12 months and baseline, respectively.

Conclusion

Vedolizumab was associated with improvements in efficacy, endoscopic activity, biochemical parameters, and decreased corticosteroid burden when used as a first-line biological treatment.

Biological treatment approach to inflammatory bowel disease is similar in academic and nonacademic centres - prime time for decentralisation of inflammatory bowel disease care?

BACKGROUND

With the increasing number of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients, it is difficult to manage them within specialised IBD teams in academic medical centres: many are therefore treated in nonacademic IBD centres. It is unclear whether the time to introducing biologics is the same in both settings.

AIM

We aimed to compare treatment approach with biologics in academic vs. nonacademic centres.

METHODS

We analysed Slovenian national IBD registry data (UR-CARE Registry, supported by the European Crohn's and Colitis Organisation), which included 2 academic (2319 patients) and 4 nonacademic IBD (429 patients) centres.

RESULTS

The disease phenotype was similar in both settings. In total, 1687 patients received 2782 treatment episodes with biologics. We observed no differences in treatment episodes with TNF-alpha inhibitors (60% vs. 61%), vedolizumab (24% vs. 23%), or ustekinumab (17% vs. 16%) in academic compared to nonacademic centres ( P  = 0.949). However, TNF inhibitors were less often the first biologic in academic centres (TNF inhibitors: 67.5% vs. 74.0%, vedolizumab: 20.3% vs. 17.9%, ustekinumab: 12.1% vs. 8.1%; P = 0.0096). Consequently, more patients received ustekinumab (29.8% vs. 18.3%) and vedolizumab (17.4% vs. 13.5%) and fewer TNF inhibitors (52.7% vs. 68.2%) for Crohn's disease in academic compared to nonacademic centres, with no such differences for ulcerative colitis. The time to initiation of the first biologic from diagnosis was short and similar in both settings (11.3 vs. 10.4 months, P  = 0.2).

CONCLUSION

In this nationwide registry analysis, we observed that biological treatment choice was similar in academic and nonacademic settings. These findings support the decentralisation of IBD care.

Real-World Effectiveness of Vedolizumab vs Anti-TNF in Biologic-naïve Crohn's Disease Patients: A 2-year Propensity-score-adjusted Analysis from the VEDOIBD-Study

BACKGROUND

The aim of this observational, real-world evidence, modified intention-to-treat (mITT) study based on prospectively collected data from the VEDOIBD registry was to compare the effectiveness of vedolizumab (VEDO) vs antitumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) in biologic-naïve Crohn's disease (CD) patients.

METHODS

Between 2017 and 2020, 557 CD patients starting therapy with VEDO or anti-TNF were consecutively enrolled in 45 IBD centers across Germany. Per study protocol, the analysis excluded biologic-experienced patients and those with a missing Harvey-Bradshaw Index score, resulting in a final sample of 327 biologic-naïve CD patients. Clinical remission was measured using the Harvey-Bradshaw Index at the end of induction therapy and after 1 and 2 years. Switching to a different therapy was considered an outcome failure. Propensity score adjustment with inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to correct for confounding.

RESULTS

The effectiveness of both VEDO (n = 86) and anti-TNF (n = 241) was remarkably high for induction treatment, but VEDO performed significantly less well than anti-TNF (clinical remission: 56.3% vs 73.9%, P < .05). In contrast, clinical remission after 2 years was significantly better for VEDO compared with anti-TNF (74.2% vs 44.7%; P < .05; odds ratio, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.22-0.94). Remarkably, only 17% of patients switched from VEDO to another biologic vs 44% who received anti-TNF.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this prospective, 2-year, real-world evidence study suggest that the choice of VEDO led to higher remission rates after 2 years compared with anti-TNF. This could support the role of VEDO as a first-line biologic therapy in CD.

Clinical use of biologics for Crohn's disease in adults: lessons learned from real-world studies

INTRODUCTION

The therapeutic armamentarium for managing Crohn's disease (CD) has expanded significantly in recent decades. Several biologics with three different mechanisms of action [anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, anti-integrin α4β7, and anti-IL 12/23] are currently available to manage CD.

AREA COVERED

This narrative review aims to summarize the most significant efficacy and safety data on the use of infliximab (IFX), adalimumab (ADA), vedolizumab (VDZ) and ustekinumab (UST) for the treatment of CD obtained from studies conducted in the real world (RW), compared to the results of randomized clinical trials (RCTs).

EXPERT OPINION

RW studies reported that biologic agents included in this analysis have higher remission rates and lower adverse event rates than findings from RCTs for treating patients with CD. All biological agents have proven effective and safe in RW studies, even when using biosimilars or switching to subcutaneous administration of the molecules for which they are available. Finally, anti-TNF-α agents, particularly IFX, have a higher rate of adverse events (AEs) than VDZ and UST. Therefore, patients at higher risk of AEs may benefit from other biologics than anti-TNF-α. However, further long-term RW studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Scalable and interpretable alternative to chart review for phenotype evaluation using standardized structured data from electronic health records

OBJECTIVES

Chart review as the current gold standard for phenotype evaluation cannot support observational research on electronic health records and claims data sources at scale. We aimed to evaluate the ability of structured data to support efficient and interpretable phenotype evaluation as an alternative to chart review.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We developed Knowledge-Enhanced Electronic Profile Review (KEEPER) as a phenotype evaluation tool that extracts patient's structured data elements relevant to a phenotype and presents them in a standardized fashion following clinical reasoning principles. We evaluated its performance (interrater agreement, intermethod agreement, accuracy, and review time) compared to manual chart review for 4 conditions using randomized 2-period, 2-sequence crossover design.

RESULTS

Case ascertainment with KEEPER was twice as fast compared to manual chart review. 88.1% of the patients were classified concordantly using charts and KEEPER, but agreement varied depending on the condition. Missing data and differences in interpretation accounted for most of the discrepancies. Pairs of clinicians agreed in case ascertainment in 91.2% of the cases when using KEEPER compared to 76.3% when using charts. Patient classification aligned with the gold standard in 88.1% and 86.9% of the cases respectively.

CONCLUSION

Structured data can be used for efficient and interpretable phenotype evaluation if they are limited to relevant subset and organized according to the clinical reasoning principles. A system that implements these principles can achieve noninferior performance compared to chart review at a fraction of time.

Effectiveness and Safety of Vedolizumab in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Comprehensive Meta-analysis of Observational Studies

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Many observational studies on the use of vedolizumab [VDZ] in patients with Crohn's disease [CD] and ulcerative colitis [UC] have been published in the past few years. We aimed to comprehensively summarise its effectiveness and safety by pooling data only from observational studies.

METHODS

PubMed/Medline and Embase were systematically searched for observational studies on patients with CD and UC treated with VDZ through December 2021. The rates of clinical remission and overall adverse events were the primary outcomes. The rates of steroid-free clinical remission, clinical response, mucosal healing, C-reactive protein normalisation, loss of response, VDZ dose escalation, colectomy, serious adverse events, infections, and malignancies were considered as secondary outcomes.

RESULTS

In all, 88 studies comprising 25 678 patients [13 663 with CD and 12 015 with UC] met the inclusion criteria. In patients with CD, the pooled estimate rates of clinical remission were 36% at induction and 39% at maintenance. In patients with UC, the pooled estimate rates of clinical remission were 40% at induction and 45% at maintenance. The pooled estimate of incidence rate of adverse events was 34.6 per 100 person-years. At multivariable meta-regression analysis, studies with increased male proportion were independently associated with higher rates of clinical remission and steroid-free clinical remission at both induction and maintenance, and clinical response at maintenance in patients with CD. Studies with increased disease duration were independently associated with higher mucosal healing rates at maintenance in patients with UC.

CONCLUSIONS

Observational studies demonstrated extensively the effectiveness of VDZ, with a reassuring safety profile.

Real-world effectiveness of vedolizumab compared to anti-TNF agents in biologic-naïve patients with ulcerative colitis: A two-year propensity-score-adjusted analysis from the prospective, observational VEDOIBD -study

BACKGROUND

This observational real-world evidence (RWE) study is based on prospectively collected data from the VEDOIBD registry study.

AIM

To compare the effectiveness of vedolizumab and anti-TNF agents in biologic-naïve patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) at the end of induction and during maintenance treatment.

METHODS

Between 2017 and 2020, we enrolled 512 patients with UC starting therapy with vedolizumab or an anti-TNF agent in 45 IBD centres across Germany. We excluded biologic-experienced patients and those with missing partial Mayo (pMayo) outcomes; this resulted in a final sample of 314 (182 on vedolizumab and 132 on an anti-TNF agent). The primary outcome was clinical remission measured using pMayo score; any switch to a different biologic agent was considered an outcome failure (modified ITT analysis). We used propensity score adjustment with inverse probability of treatment weighting to correct for confounding.

RESULTS

During induction therapy, clinical remission was relatively low and similar in vedolizumab- and anti-TNF-treated patients (23% vs. 30.4%, p = 0.204). However, clinical remission rates after two years were significantly higher for vedolizumab-treated patients than those treated with an anti-TNF agent (43.2% vs. 25.8%, p < 0.011). Among patients treated with vedolzumab, 29% switched to other biologics, versus 54% who had received an anti-TNF agent.

CONCLUSION

After two years of treatment, vedolizumab resulted in higher remission rates than anti-TNF agents.

Rates of clinical remission and inadequate response to advanced therapies among patients with ulcerative colitis in Germany

PURPOSE

Many patients treated for ulcerative colitis (UC) do not achieve clinical remission. This real-world study assessed clinical remission and inadequate response rates among patients with UC in Germany treated with advanced therapies.

METHODS

This retrospective chart review included patients with UC newly initiating advanced (index) therapy (anti-TNFα agents, vedolizumab, tofacitinib) from January 2017-September 2019 (index date). Included patients had data for ≥ 12 months before (baseline period) and after the index date (follow-up period). Remission was defined as a partial Mayo score ≤ 1. Indicators of inadequate response were: index therapy discontinuation; therapy adjustments (index therapy dose escalation; augmentation with non-advanced therapies; corticosteroid [CS] use during maintenance therapy); CS dependency (use for ≥ 12 weeks); and UC-related hospitalisation, surgery or emergency department visit. Time to first remission and inadequate response were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier analyses.

RESULTS

Among 149 patients with UC (median age: 40 years), 96 (64.4%) were biologic-naïve and 42 (28.2%) received CS at the index date. Within 12 months, 52 patients (47.2%) were in remission; of these, 13 patients (25.0%) received ≥ 1 therapy adjustment. At 12 months, 55 patients (37.6%) had ≥ 1 indicator of an inadequate response. Median time to remission was longer among biologic-experienced vs biologic-naïve patients (24 vs 7 months; p = 0.012).

CONCLUSION

Over half of the patients were not in clinical remission after 12 months and more than one-third experienced inadequate response. One-quarter of patients in remission required therapy adjustments. Patients with UC require therapies that are more effective than those currently available to achieve better treatment outcomes.

The Efficacy of Currently Licensed Biologics for Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis: A Literature Review

Biologics have been emerging as promising therapies in ulcerative colitis (UC) patients who are refractory to conventional medical treatment. This literature review aims to appraise the existing evidence on the efficacy and safety of NICE approved biological therapies, of which there are currently five licensed drugs, available for the treatment of UC in adults. An initial search was performed using National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidelines. A further literature search of EMBASE, MEDLINE, Science Direct and Cochrane Library databases was done, resulting in a total of 62 studies being included in this review. Recent and seminal papers were included. Inclusion criteria for this review were adult participants and English papers only. In most studies, anti-tumour necrosis factor ɑ (TNFɑ) naïve patients were found to have improved clinical outcomes. Infliximab was found to be highly effective in inducing short-term clinical response, clinical remission as well as mucosal healing. However, loss of response was common and dose escalation was often required for achievement of long-term efficacy. Adalimumab was found to have both short-term and long-term efficacy which was also supported by real-world data. Golimumab was shown to have comparable efficacy and safety profiles to other biologics, although lack of therapeutic dose monitoring and loss of response is a barrier to optimising golimumab treatment efficacy. Vedolizumab was shown to have higher clinical remission rates when compared to adalimumab in a head-to-head trial, and the most cost-effective biologic when calculating quality-adjusted life years. Ustekinumab was found to significantly improve clinical remission rates in UC patients who were previously unresponsive to other biological treatments. However, as this is a newly licensed drug, there is limited literature currently available. Further, head-to-head studies are required to help determine the optimal treatment for patients with UC. With patents expiring, the development of biosimilars will help to reduce costs and increase the availability of these drugs to patients.

Vedolizumab is superior to infliximab in biologic naïve patients with ulcerative colitis

There are no prospective, head-to-head, controlled trials comparing the efficacy and safety of Infliximab (IFX) and Vedolizumab (VDZ) for the treatment of moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis (UC), while only a few real-life retrospective studies have been published so far. We assessed the efficacy of IFX vs. VDZ in two cohorts of biologic-naïve outpatients with moderate-to-severe UC or mild, but refractory, disease. Data were extracted from patients' files and reviewed. The duration of follow-up (FU) was 52 weeks. The primary endpoint was the clinical remission (CR) at the end of FU. Secondary endpoints were: drug persistency, time to obtain CR, clinical response at the end of the induction phase (IP), steroid-free CR (compared to patients who used steroids at baseline) at the end of FU, need for drug optimization, adverse events (AEs), and normalization of C-reactive protein (CRP). We also analyzed the causes of dropping out (primary non-response), or secondary loss of response (immunogenic or not), for each group. We enrolled 82 patients (50 IFX and 32 VDZ) who met the inclusion criteria. At the end of FU, CR was obtained in 32% of the patients on IFX and 75% on VDZ (p = 0.0003). Drug persistency was superior for VDZ compared to IFX (78% vs. 52%, p = 0.033). Clinical response at the end of induction was reached in 54% and in 81% in the IFX and VDZ group, respectively (p = 0.014). Steroid-free clinical remission at the end of FU was 62% and 94% in the IFX vs. VDZ group, respectively (p = 0.036). The need for drug optimization was higher for VDZ than for IFX (28% vs. 57%, p = 0.009), while the time to obtain CR, the incidence of AEs, mean duration of FU, and rate of CRP normalization at the end of IP were comparable between the two groups. There was a prevalence of patients dropping out because of primary non-response in IFX group (p = 0.027), while the incidence of secondary loss of response was similar in the two groups. At the multivariate analysis, CRP and Partial Mayo Score (PMS) at T0 did not correlate with CR at the end of FU in both groups. In this retrospective, real world data study in biologic-naïve patients, VDZ was superior to IFX in CR, clinical response rate at the end of IP, drug persistency, steroid-free remission, and need for optimization at the end of FU.

Real-world data and evidence in pain research: a qualitative systematic review of methods in current practice

The use of routinely collected health data (real-world data, RWD) to generate real-world evidence (RWE) for research purposes is a growing field. Computerized search methods, large electronic databases, and the development of novel statistical methods allow for valid analysis of data outside its primary clinical purpose. Here, we systematically reviewed the methodology used for RWE studies in pain research. We searched 3 databases (PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science) for studies using retrospective data sources comparing multiple groups or treatments. The protocol was registered under the DOI:10.17605/OSF.IO/KGVRM. A total of 65 studies were included. Of those, only 4 compared pharmacological interventions, whereas 49 investigated differences in surgical procedures, with the remaining studying alternative or psychological interventions or epidemiological factors. Most 39 studies reported significant results in their primary comparison, and an additional 12 reported comparable effectiveness. Fifty-eight studies used propensity scores to account for group differences, 38 of them using 1:1 case:control matching. Only 17 of 65 studies provided sensitivity analyses to show robustness of their findings, and only 4 studies provided links to publicly accessible protocols. RWE is a relevant construct that can provide evidence complementary to randomized controlled trials (RCTs), especially in scenarios where RCTs are difficult to conduct. The high proportion of studies reporting significant differences between groups or comparable effectiveness could imply a relevant degree of publication bias. RWD provides a potentially important resource to expand high-quality evidence beyond clinical trials, but rigorous quality standards need to be set to maximize the validity of RWE studies.

Comparative Long-Term Drug Survival of Vedolizumab, Adalimumab, and Infliximab in Biologic-Naïve Patients with Ulcerative Colitis

BACKGROUND

The comparative long-term survival of first-line biologics for UC and reasons for drug discontinuation are poorly understood. We sought to compare the long-term drug survival related to non-response (NR) and adverse effects (AEs) for vedolizumab, adalimumab, and infliximab among biologic-naïve patients with UC.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of adult biologic-naïve patients with moderate-to-severe UC initiating vedolizumab, adalimumab, or infliximab 6/1/14-12/31/20 at a large academic medical center. The primary outcome was time to biologic discontinuation for primary or secondary NR (including colectomy). The secondary outcome was time to biologic discontinuation due to AEs. Inverse probability of treatment-weighted (IPTW) Cox regression was used to perform three pair-wise comparisons of drug survival.

RESULTS

The cohort included 805 patients with UC who initiated vedolizumab (n = 195), adalimumab (n = 278), or infliximab (n = 332). The adjusted hazard of biologic discontinuation for NR was significantly lower for vedolizumab vs adalimumab (HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.34-0.75), similar for vedolizumab vs infliximab (HR 1.32, 95% CI 0.79-2.18), and greater for adalimumab vs infliximab (HR 2.07, 95% CI 1.51-2.86). The adjusted hazard of discontinuation for AEs was significantly lower for vedolizumab vs adalimumab (HR 0.25, 95% CI 0.09-0.64), lower for vedolizumab vs infliximab (HR 0.21, 95% CI 0.10-0.46), and similar for adalimumab vs infliximab (HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.53-1.35).

CONCLUSIONS

There was greater survival of vedolizumab compared to adalimumab for clinical response and greater survival of vedolizumab compared to both adalimumab and infliximab for AEs. These long-term data support the use of vedolizumab as a first-line biologic over adalimumab for biologic-naïve patients with UC.

Effectiveness and Safety Profiles of Biological Therapies in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Real Life Data from an Active Pharmacovigilance Project

Post-marketing surveillance is essential to evaluate the risk/benefit profile of drugs; however, pharmacovigilance studies comparing persistence and safety of biologic therapies in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are scant. The aim of this study was to prospectively investigate persistence together with safety profiles of biologics in a cohort of patients diagnosed with Crohn's Disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC) followed by the IBD unit of Messina and treated with infliximab (IFX), adalimumab (ADA), golimumab (GOL), vedolizumab (VED), and ustekinumab (UST) from 2017 through 2021. Descriptive and treatment persistence analyses with predictors for discontinuation and occurrence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were performed. A total of 675 IBD patients were enrolled. A higher persistence rate was noted for UST and ADA in the first year (83.8% and 83.1%, respectively) and for IFX in the fifth year of treatment (58.1%). GOL, VED, and UST-all used as second/third-line therapies-seemed to have a higher risk of non-persistence than IFX (in order HR: 2.19; CI 95%: 1.33-3.61, 1.45; 1.04-2.04, 2.25; 1.25-4.07) as well as switchers and those who had at least one ADR (18.1; 13.22-24.68 and 1.55; 1.20-1.99, respectively). The reported ADRs, which were generally mild-moderate, were largely known. However, real-world data should be implemented to further study undetected safety concerns, including risk of malignancy.

Continuous clinical remission with biologics in ulcerative colitis: the 'AURORA' comparison study

OBJECTIVES

Comparative trials among biological drugs for the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC) provided conflicting results. After patent expire of infliximab originator, adalimumab, infliximab biosimilar, golimumab and vedolizumab have been approved in Italy.We compared the efficacy of these four biologics in UC according to the concept of continuous clinical remission (CCR).

METHODS

In a retrospective, multicentre study, all UC patients treated with adalimumab, infliximab biosimilar, golimumab or vedolizumab between 2014 and 2019 were included. All drugs were compared to each other according to the 1-year CCR rate, defined as Mayo partial score ≤2, with bleeding subscore = 0, without any relapse or optimization with dose escalation, topical treatments or steroid use after first clinical remission.

RESULTS

Four-hundred sixteen patients (adalimumab = 90, infliximab biosimilar = 105, golimumab = 79, vedolizumab = 142) were included. CCR was achieved in similar percentages among the groups (33%, 37%, 28%, 37%, respectively). All drugs were equivalent in biologic-naive patients, while vedolizumab was better than a second anti-TNFα in prior anti-TNFα agent failures. No differences were found according to type of adverse events or severe adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on a strict definition of clinical remission, all biologics appear equally effective at 1 year. Changing to vedolizumab is more effective than switching to another anti-TNFα in TNFα failures.

Vedolizumab as the first line of biologic therapy for ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease - a systematic review with meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The efficacy and safety of vedolizumab in bio-naïve patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD) remain unknown.

AIMS

To perform a meta-analysis regarding vedolizumab as first line of biological therapy for UC or CD.

METHODS

A systematic review of Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases per December 2020 was undertaken. Meta-analysis was conducted using random-effects models.

RESULTS

This systematic review identified 79 eligible studies with 4,520 and 3,494 bio-naïve patients with UC and CD, respectively, and 8,105 and 11,140 bio-exposed patients. Among bio-naïve patients with UC, a total of 40.0% (95%CI 27.0-54.0, I²=86%) and 63.9% (95%CI 47.0-79.2, I²=36%) achieved clinical remission at weeks 14 and 52, respectively. The corresponding rates in CD were 54.0% (95%CI 42.0-66.0, I²=23%), and 61.7% (95%CI 55.2-68.1, I²=0%). Bio-naïvety was associated with a higher probability of clinical remission at week 52 in UC (relative risk (RR)=1.32 (95%CI 1.14-1.53)), while this was only apparent until week 26 in CD (RR=1.60 (95%CI 1.30-1.95)). Finally, bio-naïve UC patients had a lower risk of serious adverse events (RR=0.29 (95%CI 0.09-0.95)).

CONCLUSION

Vedolizumab was found to have a favorable efficacy and safety profile in bio-naïve patients with UC and CD. The findings have implications in the management of IBD.

Treatment persistence and maintenance dose titration among ulcerative colitis patients on biologics: a pooled study of three United States claim databases

OBJECTIVE

This real-world study evaluated biologic treatment patterns in patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis (UC).

METHODS

IQVIA PharMetrics, IBM MarketScan, and Optum Clinformatics were pooled to identify UC patients with ≥1 claim for UC and ≥1 claim for adalimumab (ADA), golimumab (GOL), infliximab (IFX), or vedolizumab (VDZ). The index date for each biologic was the first claim for that biologic. Patients could be included in >1 cohort if they switched biologics during the identification period. Continuous eligibility for medical/pharmacy benefits was required for 12 months before (baseline) and after (follow-up) the index date. Patients lacking claims for any biologic during baseline were categorized as bio-naïve; those with any biologic claim were categorized as bio-experienced. Persistence was defined as the proportion of patients that remained on the index biologic without a gap between claims of >28 days for ADA, >56 days for GOL, and >112 days for IFX and VDZ. Dose titration was assessed among patients with ≥2 maintenance doses during follow-up among ADA, GOL, and VDZ patients.

RESULTS

In total, 6,106 bio-naïve UC patients and 1,027 bio-experienced UC patients were identified. Patients treated with VDZ and IFX had the highest persistence followed by ADA and GOL patients for bio-naïve and bio-experienced, respectively. ADA patients had a numerically higher proportion of patients with 50% dose escalation, followed by VDZ and GOL; 50% dose reduction was observed in ≤1% patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In this descriptive study of UC patients without confounder adjustment, VDZ persistence was numerically highest followed by IFX, GOL, and ADA across both populations.

Is There a Best First Line Biological/Small Molecule in IBD: Are We Ready for Sequencing?

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic, life-long inflammatory condition of the gastrointestinal tract. Treatment strategy depends on the severity of the disease course. IBD physicians need to be aware of the life-long treatment options available. The goal is not only to achieve clinical remission but to halt or stabilize the chronic inflammation in the intestines to prevent further structural damage. Therefore, the use of early biologic therapy is recommended in moderate-to-severe IBD patients. However, in the last decade, use of therapeutic drug monitoring has increased considerably, opening an opportunity for sequencing. This review summarizes the available evidence on biologic and small molecules therapy in Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) in different clinical scenarios, including perianal CD, the elderly, extra intestinal manifestations, and pregnancy.

How to Choose the Biologic Therapy in a Bio-Naïve Patient with Inflammatory Bowel Disease

The availability of biologic therapies in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is increasing significantly. This represents more options to treat patients, but also more difficulties in choosing the therapies, especially in the context of bio-naïve patients. Most evidence of safety and efficacy came from clinical trials comparing biologics with placebo, with a lack of head-to-head studies. Network meta-analysis of biologics and real-world studies have been developed to solve this problem. Despite the results of these studies, there are also other important factors to consider before choosing the biologic, such as patient preferences, comorbidities, genetics, and inflammatory markers. Given that resources are limited, another important aspect is the cost of biologic therapy, since biosimilars are widely available and have been demonstrated to be effective with a significant decrease in costs. In this review, we summarize the evidence comparing biologic therapy in both Crohn´s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) in different clinical situations. We also briefly synthesize the evidence related to predictors of biologic response, as well as the biologic use in extraintestinal manifestations and the importance of the drug-related costs.

Vedolizumab as first-line biological therapy in elderly patients and those with contraindications for anti-TNF therapy: a real-world, nationwide cohort of patients with inflammatory bowel diseases

BACKGROUND

Data from real-life populations about vedolizumab as first-line biological therapy for ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD) are emerging.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the efficacy and safety of vedolizumab in bio-naïve patients with UC and CD.

METHODS

A Danish nationwide cohort study was conducted between November 2014 and November 2019. Primary outcomes were clinical remission, steroid-free clinical remission, and sustained clinical remission from weeks 14 through 52.

RESULTS

The study included 56 patients (UC:31, CD:25) who initiated treatment with vedolizumab mainly because of contraindications to anti-TNFs, of whom 54.8 and 24.0%, respectively received systemic steroids at the initiation. Rates of clinical remission at weeks 6, 14, and 52 were 32.0, 48.0, and 40.0%, respectively, in UC, and 36.8, 36.8, and 47.4% in CD. Steroid-free clinical remission at week 52 was achieved among 36.0 and 47.4% of UC and CD patients, while sustained clinical remission was achieved in 32.0 and 36.8%. Lack of remission was associated with being female (68.8 vs. 11.1%, p = .01) in UC and non-structuring, non-penetrating behavior in CD (90.0 vs. 44.4%, p = .03); however, this was not confirmed in multivariate analysis. Discontinuation due to primary non-response occurred in 20.0 and 5.3% of UC and CD patients, respectively, while rates of secondary loss of response were 12.0 and 5.3% after 52 weeks of follow-up. Vedolizumab was well-tolerated as only one UC patient experienced a serious adverse event.

CONCLUSION

Vedolizumab is effective in the achievement of short-term, long-term, and steroid-free clinical remission in bio-naïve UC and CD patients.

Real-world effectiveness of vedolizumab in inflammatory bowel disease: week 52 results from the Swedish prospective multicentre SVEAH study

BACKGROUND

Prospectively and systematically collected real-world data on vedolizumab are scarce. We aimed to assess the long-term clinical effectiveness of vedolizumab in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).

METHODS

This study was a prospective, observational, multicentre study. Overall, 286 patients with active IBD were included (Crohn's disease, n = 169; ulcerative colitis, n = 117). The primary outcomes were clinical response at week 12 and clinical remission at week 52, based on the Harvey Bradshaw Index and the partial Mayo Clinic score. Secondary outcomes included clinical remission at week 12, clinical response at week 52, corticosteroid-free clinical remission at week 52, changes in biochemical measures, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL).

RESULTS

At baseline, 88% of the patients were exposed to anti-TNF and 41% of the patients with Crohn's disease had undergone ⩾1 surgical resection. At week 12, clinical response was 27% and remission 47% in Crohn's disease; corresponding figures in ulcerative colitis were 52% and 34%. Clinical response, remission and corticosteroid-free remission at week 52 were 22%, 41% and 40% in Crohn's disease and 49%, 47% and 46% in ulcerative colitis, respectively. A statistically significant decrease in median faecal-calprotectin and C-reactive protein was observed at 12 and 52 weeks in patients with Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. The HRQoL measures Short Health Scale and EuroQol 5-Dimensions improved in both Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis patients (p < 0.001). Clinical disease activity at baseline was inversely associated with clinical remission at week 52.

CONCLUSION

Vedolizumab proved effective for the treatment of refractory IBD in clinical practice.

A Validated Prognostic Model and Nomogram to Predict Early-Onset Complications Leading to Surgery in Patients With Crohn's Disease

BACKGROUND

Predicting aggressive Crohn's disease is crucial for determining therapeutic strategies.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to develop a prognostic model to predict complications leading to surgery within 1 year after diagnosis of Crohn's disease and to create a nomogram to facilitate clinical decision making.

DESIGN

This is a retrospective study.

SETTING

This study was conducted from January 2012 to December 2016 in a single tertiary IBD center.

PATIENTS

Patients diagnosed with Crohn's disease showing B1 behavior according to the Montreal classification were included.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

We measured the occurrence of complications that would ultimately lead to surgery, including severe GI bleeding (Glasgow-Blatchford score ≥6), stenosis, and perforations, confirmed by endoscopy, CT scan, and/or interventional radiology.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up period was 54 months (SD 13 months). Of the 614 eligible patients, 13.5% developed complications leading to surgery. Multivariable logistic regression revealed the independent predictors of early-onset complications to be age (adjusted odds ratio per 10-year increase in age = 0.4; 95% CI, 0.2-0.8; p = 0.004), disease duration (adjusted odds ratio = 2.7, 95% CI, 1.9-3.8; p < 0.001), perianal disease (adjusted odds ratio = 16.0; 95% CI, 4.3-59.9; p < 0.001), previous surgery (adjusted odds ratio = 3.7; 95% CI, 1.6-8.6; p = 0.003), and extraintestinal manifestations (adjusted odds ratio = 7.6; 95% CI, 2.3-24.9; p = 0.001). The specificity and sensitivity of the prognostic model were 88.3% (95% CI, 84.8%-91.2%) and 96.6% (95% CI, 88.1%-99.6%), and the area under the curve was 0.97 (95% CI, 0.95-0.98). This model was validated with good discrimination and excellent calibration using the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test. A nomogram was created to facilitate clinical bedside practice.

LIMITATIONS

This was a retrospective design and included a small sample size from 1 center.

CONCLUSIONS

Our validated prognostic model effectively predicted early-onset complications leading to surgery and screened aggressive Crohn's disease, which will enable physicians to customize therapeutic strategies and monitor disease. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B442.Registered at Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR1900025751).

UN MODELO DE PRONSTICO VALIDADO Y UN NOMOGRAMA PARA PREDECIR COMPLICACIONES PRECOCES QUE REQUIRAN CIRUGA EN PACIENTES CON ENFERMEDAD DE CROHN

ANTECEDENTES:Predecir una enfermedad de Crohn muy agresiva es fundamental para determinar la estrategia terapéutica.OBJETIVO:Desarrollar un modelo de pronóstico para predecir las complicaciones que requieran cirugía dentro el primer año al diagnóstico de enfermedad de Crohn y crear un nomograma para facilitar la toma de decisiones clínicas.DISEÑO:El presente etudio es retrospectivo.AJUSTE:Estudio realizado entre Enero 2012 y Diciembre 2016, en un único centro terciario de tratamiento de enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal.PACIENTES:Se incluyeron todos aquellos pacientes diagnosticados de enfermedad de Crohn que mostraban manifestaciones tipo B1 según la clasificación de Montreal.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Medimos la aparición de complicaciones que finalmente conducirían a una cirugía, incluida la hemorragia digestiva grave (puntuación de Glasgow-Blatchford ≥ 6), estenosis y perforaciones, confirmadas por endoscopía, tomografía computarizada y / o radiología intervencionista.RESULTADOS:El período medio de seguimiento fue de 54 meses (desviación estándar 13 meses). De los 614 pacientes elegibles, el 13,5% desarrolló complicaciones que llevaron a cirugía. La regresión logística multivariable reveló que los predictores independientes de complicaciones de inicio temprano eran la edad (razón de probabilidades ajustada [ORa] por aumento de 10 años en la edad = 0,4; intervalos de confianza del 95% [IC del 95%]: 0,2-0,8, p = 0,004), duración de la enfermedad (ORa = 2,7, IC del 95%: 1,9-3,8, p <0,001), enfermedad perianal (ORa = 16,0, IC del 95%: 4,3-59,9, p <0,001), cirugía previa (ORa = 3,7, 95% IC: 1,6-8,6, p = 0,003) y manifestaciones extraintestinales (ORa = 7,6, IC del 95%: 2,3-24,9, p = 0,001). La especificidad y sensibilidad del modelo pronóstico fueron 88,3% (IC 95%: 84,8% -91,2%) y 96,6% (IC 95%: 88,1% -99,6%), respectivamente, y el área bajo la curva fue 0,97 (95% % CI: 0,95-0,98). Este modelo fue validado con buena discriminación y excelente calibración utilizando la prueba de bondad de ajuste de Hosmer-Lemeshow. Se creó un nomograma para facilitar la práctica clínica al pié de la cama.LIMITACIONES:Diseño retrospectivo que incluyó un tamaño de muestra pequeña en un solo centro.CONCLUSIONES:Nuestro modelo de pronóstico validado predijo eficazmente las complicaciones precoces que conllevaron a cirugía y la detección de enfermedad de Crohn agresiva, lo que permitió a los médicos personalizar las estrategias terapéuticas y controlar la enfermedad. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B442.Registrado en el Registro de Ensayos Clínicos de China (ChiCTR1900025751).

Vedolizumab in Crohn's disease with rectal fistulas and presacral abscess: A case report

BACKGROUND

Fistula and intraabdominal fistula are common complications of Crohn's disease (CD), but complex rectal fistula with abscess formation is rare. Tumor necrosis factor antagonists combined with percutaneous drainage or surgical intervention is optimal treatment for fistulizing CD with intraabdominal abscess. There is no study show the efficacy of vedolizumab in such complicated condition.

CASE SUMMARY

A 47-year-old man has decompensated liver cirrhosis, child B. He suffered from abdominal pain, bloody diarrhea, fever, and body weight loss. CD with rectoprostatic fistula, rectopresacral fistula, pre-sacral abscess and cyto-megalovirus (CMV) infection were noted. He received antibiotics, anti-viral therapy, transverse colostomy and vedolizumab treatment. Six months later, he had deep remission and complete fistula tracts closure.

CONCLUSION

Early vedolizumab and stool diversion are effective and safe in treating CD with complex rectal fistula with abscess formation.