1
|
Peruhova M, Stoyanova D, Miteva DG, Kitanova M, Mirchev MB, Velikova T. Genetic factors that predict response and failure of biologic therapy in inflammatory bowel disease. World J Exp Med 2025; 15:97404. [PMID: 40115750 PMCID: PMC11718585 DOI: 10.5493/wjem.v15.i1.97404] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2024] [Revised: 10/09/2024] [Accepted: 11/14/2024] [Indexed: 12/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) represents a significant disease burden marked by chronic inflammation and complications that adversely affect patients' quality of life. Effective diagnostic strategies involve clinical assessments, endoscopic evaluations, imaging studies, and biomarker testing, where early diagnosis is essential for effective management and prevention of long-term complications, highlighting the need for continual advancements in diagnostic methods. The intricate interplay between genetic factors and the outcomes of biological therapy is of critical importance. Unraveling the genetic determinants that influence responses and failures to biological therapy holds significant promise for optimizing treatment strategies for patients with IBD on biologics. Through an in-depth examination of current literature, this review article synthesizes critical genetic markers associated with therapeutic efficacy and resistance in IBD. Understanding these genetic actors paves the way for personalized approaches, informing clinicians on predicting, tailoring, and enhancing the effectiveness of biological therapies for improved outcomes in patients with IBD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Milena Peruhova
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Heart and Brain, Burgas 1000, Bulgaria
| | - Daniela Stoyanova
- Department of Gastroenterology, Military Medical Academy, Sofia 1606, Bulgaria
| | | | - Meglena Kitanova
- Department of Genetics, Faculty of Biology, Sofia University St. Kliment Ohridski, Sofia 1164, Bulgaria
| | | | - Tsvetelina Velikova
- Department of Medical Faculty, Sofia University St. Kliment Ohridski, Sofia 1407, Bulgaria
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ueno N, Saito S, Sato M, Sugiyama Y, Kobayashi Y, Murakami Y, Sugimura K, Sasaki T, Sakatani A, Takahashi K, Tanaka K, Serikawa S, Ando K, Kashima S, Muto M, Inaba Y, Moriichi K, Tanabe H, Okumura T, Fujiya M. The clinical efficacy and safety of granulocyte and monocyte adsorptive apheresis in patients with Crohn's disease: A multicenter retrospective pilot study. Ther Apher Dial 2024; 28:442-452. [PMID: 38168492 DOI: 10.1111/1744-9987.14103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2023] [Revised: 12/13/2023] [Accepted: 12/19/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION A remission induction therapy of granulocyte and monocyte adsorptive apheresis (GMA) was given to patients with Crohn's disease (CD). However, establishing an appropriate treatment strategy for GMA in patients with CD remains unclear. METHODS This study evaluated the clinical efficacy and subsequent clinical progression after GMA in patients with CD who underwent GMA in seven independent institutions in Japan from 2010 to 2023. RESULTS Sixteen patients were enrolled. The overall remission and response rates were 25.0% and 68.8%, respectively. All patients responding to GMA received biologics that were continuously used and 36.4% of patients remained on the same biologics 52 weeks after GMA. Notably, all patients who continued the same biologics had previously experienced a loss of response to biologics. CONCLUSION GMA may exhibit effectiveness even in cases with refractory CD. Moreover, it represents a potential novel therapeutic option for refractory CD with loss of response to biologics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nobuhiro Ueno
- Division of General Medicine, Asahikawa Medical University Hospital, Asahikawa, Hokkaido, Japan
- Department of Gastroenterological Sciences, Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa, Hokkaido, Japan
| | | | - Masahiro Sato
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Yuya Sugiyama
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Yu Kobayashi
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Yuki Murakami
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa, Hokkaido, Japan
| | | | - Takahiro Sasaki
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Aki Sakatani
- Department of Gastroenterological Sciences, Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Keitaro Takahashi
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Kazuyuki Tanaka
- Asahikawa Kosei General Hospital, Asahikawa, Hokkaido, Japan
| | | | - Katsuyoshi Ando
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Shin Kashima
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Momotaro Muto
- Engaru Kosei General Hospital, Engaru, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Yuhei Inaba
- Asahikawa City Hospital, Asahikawa, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Kentaro Moriichi
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Hiroki Tanabe
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Toshikatsu Okumura
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Mikihiro Fujiya
- Department of Gastroenterological Sciences, Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa, Hokkaido, Japan
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa, Hokkaido, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kumar M, Murugesan S, Ibrahim N, Elawad M, Al Khodor S. Predictive biomarkers for anti-TNF alpha therapy in IBD patients. J Transl Med 2024; 22:284. [PMID: 38493113 PMCID: PMC10943853 DOI: 10.1186/s12967-024-05058-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2024] [Accepted: 03/04/2024] [Indexed: 03/18/2024] Open
Abstract
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic gastrointestinal condition characterized by severe gut inflammation, commonly presenting as Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis or categorized as IBD- unclassified. While various treatments have demonstrated efficacy in adult IBD patients, the advent of anti-TNF therapies has significantly revolutionized treatment outcomes and clinical management. These therapies have played a pivotal role in achieving clinical and endoscopic remission, promoting mucosal healing, averting disease progression, and diminishing the necessity for surgery. Nevertheless, not all patients exhibit positive responses to these therapies, and some may experience a loss of responsiveness over time. This review aims to present a comprehensive examination of predictive biomarkers for monitoring the therapeutic response to anti-TNF therapy in IBD patients. It will explore their limitations and clinical utilities, paving the way for a more personalized and effective therapeutic approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manoj Kumar
- Research Department, Sidra Medicine, Doha, Qatar
| | | | - Nazira Ibrahim
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Sidra Medicine, Doha, Qatar
| | - Mamoun Elawad
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Sidra Medicine, Doha, Qatar
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Razmkhah F, Kim S, Lim S, Dania AJ, Choi J. S100A8 and S100A9 in Hematologic Malignancies: From Development to Therapy. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:13382. [PMID: 37686186 PMCID: PMC10488294 DOI: 10.3390/ijms241713382] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2023] [Revised: 08/18/2023] [Accepted: 08/25/2023] [Indexed: 09/10/2023] Open
Abstract
S100A8 and S100A9 are multifunctional proteins that can initiate various signaling pathways and modulate cell function both inside and outside immune cells, depending on their receptors, mediators, and molecular environment. They have been reported as dysregulated genes and proteins in a wide range of cancers, including hematologic malignancies, from diagnosis to response to therapy. The role of S100A8 and S100A9 in hematologic malignancies is highlighted due to their ability to work together or as antagonists to modify cell phenotype, including viability, differentiation, chemosensitivity, trafficking, and transcription strategies, which can lead to an oncogenic phase or reduced symptoms. In this review article, we discuss the critical roles of S100A8, S100A9, and calprotectin (heterodimer or heterotetramer forms of S100A8 and S100A9) in forming and promoting the malignant bone marrow microenvironment. We also focus on their potential roles as biomarkers and therapeutic targets in various stages of hematologic malignancies from diagnosis to treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Jaebok Choi
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA; (F.R.); (S.K.); (S.L.); (A.-J.D.)
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bamias G, Zampeli E, Domènech E. Targeting neutrophils in inflammatory bowel disease: revisiting the role of adsorptive granulocyte and monocyte apheresis. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2022; 16:721-735. [PMID: 35833363 DOI: 10.1080/17474124.2022.2100759] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2022] [Accepted: 07/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic immune-mediated disease of the gastrointestinal tract comprising Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). While any part of the digestive tract can be affected in CD, mucosal inflammation in UC is limited to the colon. Differences and similarities between the two conditions are reflected by their pathophysiology. AREAS COVERED An overview of immunological aspects, pharmacological management, and biomarkers of IBD is provided. The role of adsorptive granulocyte and monocyte apheresis (GMA) is reviewed including its primary and secondary effects on the immune system, as well as clinical studies in IBD (mainly UC), and potential biomarkers for adsorptive GMA. EXPERT OPINION In UC, adsorptive GMA with Adacolumn (Adacolumn®, JIMRO Co., Ltd. Takasaki, Gunma, Japan) selectively depletes elevated myeloid lineage leukocytes and has a range of beneficial secondary immune effects. Adsorptive GMA is a safe and effective non-pharmacological treatment option for UC. Pilot studies have reported promising results for adsorptive GMA in combination with biological agents, although larger studies are required. Fecal calprotectin concentrations, neutrophil counts in histological samples and/or the neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio in peripheral blood may prove to be useful biomarkers for predicting GMA effectiveness in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giorgos Bamias
- GI-Unit, 3rd Department of Internal Medicine National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Sotiria Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Evanthia Zampeli
- Gastroenterology Department, Alexandra General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Eugeni Domènech
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias I Pujol, Badalona, Catalonia, Spain, and Centro de Investigación Biomédica En Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas Y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Yasmin F, Najeeb H, Naeem U, Moeed A, Koritala T, Surani S. Apheresis: A cell-based therapeutic tool for the inflammatory bowel disease. World J Clin Cases 2022; 10:7195-7208. [PMID: 36158031 PMCID: PMC9353887 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i21.7195] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2021] [Revised: 12/16/2021] [Accepted: 06/04/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) is a hallmark of leukocyte infiltration, followed by the release of cytokines and interleukins. Disease progression to Ulcerative Colitis (UC) or Crohn's Disease (CD) remained largely incurable. The genetic and environmental factors disrupt enteral bacteria in the gut, which hampers the intestinal repairing capability of damaged mucosa. Commonly practiced pharmacological therapies include 5-aminosalicylic acid with corticosteroids and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α. New interventions such as CDP571 and TNF-blocking RDP58 report the loss of patient response. This review discusses the non-pharmacologic selective granulocyte-monocyte-apheresis (GMA) and leukocytapheresis (LCAP) that have been proposed as treatment modalities that reduce mortality. GMA, an extracorporeal vein-to-vein technique, presents a strong safety profile case for its use as a viable therapeutic option compared to GMA's conventional medication safety profile. GMA reported minimal to no side effects in the pediatric population and pregnant women. Numerous studies report the efficacious nature of GMA in UC patients, whereas data on CD patients is insufficient. Its benefits outweigh the risks and are emerging as a favored non-pharmacological treatment option. On the contrary, LCAP uses a general extracorporeal treatment that entraps leukocytes and suppresses cytokine release. It has been deemed more efficacious than conventional drug treatments, the former causing better disease remission, and maintenance. Patients with UC/CD secondary to complications have responded well to the treatment. Side effects of the procedure have remained mild to moderate, and there is little evidence of any severe adverse event occurring in most age groups. LCAP decreases the dependence on steroids and immunosuppressive therapies for IBD. The review will discuss the role of GMA and LCAP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Farah Yasmin
- Department of Medicine, DOW University of Health Sciences, Karachi 74200, Pakistan
| | - Hala Najeeb
- Department of Medicine, DOW University of Health Sciences, Karachi 74200, Pakistan
| | - Unaiza Naeem
- Department of Medicine, DOW University of Health Sciences, Karachi 74200, Pakistan
| | - Abdul Moeed
- Department of Medicine, DOW University of Health Sciences, Karachi 74200, Pakistan
| | - Thoyaja Koritala
- Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55902, United States
| | - Salim Surani
- Department of Medicine, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843, United States
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55902, United States
| |
Collapse
|