Optimal care for the management of older people non-weight bearing after lower limb fracture: a consensus study

Consensus on managing open ankle fractures in the frail patient

Aims

Ankle fractures are common injuries and the third most common fragility fracture. In all, 40% of ankle fractures in the frail are open and represent a complex clinical scenario, with morbidity and mortality rates similar to hip fracture patients. They have a higher risk of complications, such as wound infections, malunion, hospital-acquired infections, pressure sores, veno-thromboembolic events, and significant sarcopaenia from prolonged bed rest.

Methods

A modified Delphi method was used and a group of experts with a vested interest in best practice were invited from the British Foot and Ankle Society (BOFAS), British Orthopaedic Association (BOA), Orthopaedic Trauma Society (OTS), British Association of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgeons (BAPRAS), British Geriatric Society (BGS), and the British Limb Reconstruction Society (BLRS).

Results

In the first stage, there were 36 respondents to the survey, with over 70% stating their unit treats more than 20 such cases per year. There was a 50:50 split regarding if the timing of surgery should be within 36 hours, as per the hip fracture guidelines, or 72 hours, as per the open fracture guidelines. Overall, 75% would attempt primary wound closure and 25% would utilize a local flap. There was no orthopaedic agreement on fixation, and 75% would permit weightbearing immediately. In the second stage, performed at the BLRS meeting, experts discussed the survey results and agreed upon a consensus for the management of open elderly ankle fractures.

Conclusion

A mutually agreed consensus from the expert panel was reached to enable the best practice for the management of patients with frailty with an open ankle fracture: 1) all units managing lower limb fragility fractures should do so through a cohorted multidisciplinary pathway. This pathway should follow the standards laid down in the "care of the older or frail orthopaedic trauma patient" British Orthopaedic Association Standards for Trauma and Orthopaedics (BOAST) guideline. These patients have low bone density, and we should recommend full falls and bone health assessment; 2) all open lower limb fragility fractures should be treated in a single stage within 24 hours of injury if possible; 3) all patients with fragility fractures of the lower limb should be considered for mobilisation on the day following surgery; 4) all patients with lower limb open fragility fractures should be considered for tissue sparing, with judicious debridement as a default; 5) all patients with open lower limb fragility fractures should be managed by a consultant plastic surgeon with primary closure wherever possible; and 6) the method of fixation must allow for immediate unrestricted weightbearing.

Rehabilitation nursing after lower limb fracture: Preventing deep vein thrombosis and enhancing quality of life

This study aimed to assess the preventive role of rehabilitation nursing in the formation of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in the lower limbs after fracture and its effect on the patient's quality of life. Ninety patients with lower limb fractures were randomly divided into a study group (n = 45) and a control group (n = 45). Patients in the control group received routine care postoperatively, whereas patients in the study group received rehabilitation nursing intervention on the same postoperative day. A follow-up examination was conducted after 3 months. The occurrence rate of lower limb DVT (LDVT) complications, hemorheology, quality of life (SF-36) scores, coagulation profile, and nursing satisfaction were compared between the groups. After the intervention, the study group presented with lower extremity DVT and higher hemorheology indices than those of the control group (P < .05). The SF-36 scores of both groups increased, but the increase in SF-36 scores in the study group was more significant (P < .001). The satisfaction level of the patients in the study group with nursing services was higher than that of the control group (P = .004). Coagulation indicators can be effectively adjusted and the occurrence of postoperative complications can be reduced in patients undergoing spine fracture surgery such as DVT via standardized rehabilitation care, thereby improving patients' quality of life and nursing conditions.

Fix and replace: Simultaneous fracture fixation and hip replacement for acetabular fractures in older patients

INTRODUCTION

Displaced acetabular fractures in the elderly present significant treatment challenges. The 'fix and replace' concept involves open reduction and internal fixation of the acetabulum, providing bony stability to accept the press-fit of an acetabular cup, with a cemented femoral stem. This allows early mobilisation and the advantages this confers. This study of 57 patients treated with fix and replace describes our technique, outcomes, and survival analysis.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 57 'fix and replace' procedures in patients aged over 60 was performed. Data was collected on mechanism, fracture type, demographics, time to surgery, comorbidity index, complications, EQ-5D and Oxford hip scores (OHS). Radiographs were reviewed for fracture healing, implant loosening, cup migration, and heterotopic ossification.

RESULTS

57 patients aged 60 to 95 had fix and replace surgery. The median ASA score was 3. The mean Charlson Index was 4.8. 45 patients had a low-energy fall, 6 had a road traffic accident, 3 fell off a bicycle, and 1 mechanism was unclear. The fracture patterns were anterior column posterior hemitransverse (67%), associated both columns (9%), posterior column (9%), posterior column and posterior wall (9%), and transverse (2%). The mean time to surgery was 8.4 days (0-14). 26 out of 57 (46%) received a blood transfusion. Mean length of stay was 17.6 days (7-86). The mean follow-up was 35.5 months. 4 dislocations were treated with closed reduction, whilst 1 required excision arthroplasty. 2 infections resolved with debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR), whilst 1 required a two-stage revision. 1 acetabular component had migrated requiring revision. The median pre-injury OHS was 44 (26-48) compared to 37.3 (28-48) at 1 year. There were no deaths at 30-days, whilst at 1 year 7 patients had died. Kaplan Meier survival analysis showed mean survival was 1984.5 days. Implant survival was 90% at 1 year.

CONCLUSION

While fix and replace is conceptually attractive, this medically complex patient group requires considerable support peri‑ and post-operatively. Further studies are required to provide clinicians with more information to decide on how best to provide a holistic management strategy for such injuries in this frail patient cohort.