What we need as we get older: needs assessment for the development of a community geriatrics service in an Australian context

The renewed Development Model for Integrated Care: a systematic review and model update

BACKGROUND

Organising integrated health services beyond domains in interorganizational networks, can be supported by conceptual models to overview the complexity. The Development Model for Integrated Care (DMIC) is a systematically developed generic model that has been applied to innovate and implement integrated care services in a large range of (international) healthcare settings. After a decade, it is important to incorporate new available literature in the model. Therefore, our aim was to update and further develop the DMIC by incorporating the current body of knowledge.

METHODS

A systematic literature review and subsequent stepwise systematic update of the DMIC.

RESULTS

The review of the literature resulted in 179 included studies and eventually 20 new elements for the development model, which could be positioned in the nine clusters. New elements address the importance of the social system and community of the client, proactive care during the life span, digital (care) services and ethical and value driven collaboration in interorganizational networks that cross domains. The added elements for integrated care build further on the nine thematic clusters and the model as a whole, expanded with new accents.

CONCLUSION

The renewed model emphasizes the connectedness of care within a larger eco-system approach and inter-organizational networks. The model captures current knowledge which can be supportive as a generic conceptual model to develop, implement or innovate integrated services towards health value in societies. Further, it can serve for healthcare services research purposes to reflect on an monitor developments in integrated care settings over time on multiple levels.

Community health needs assessment: findings from a community-university partnership strengthening program on maternal and child health in Pakistan

BACKGROUND

Pakistan has been progressing at a slow pace in enhancing maternal and child health (MCH) indicators, experiencing some of the poorest pregnancy outcomes globally. In response to the challenges faced at the community level in MCH, a community health needs assessment (CHNA) was undertaken through a community-university partnership project. The aim of this CHNA was to understand the MCH needs and associated social determinants within the specific local context of the community.

METHODS

The assessment of community MCH needs was performed in two phases in Lahore, Pakistan. Initially, the semi-urban area of Shah Di Khoi, within the university's catchment area, was chosen based on an extensive review of both primary and secondary data. In the second phase, a CHNA was conducted among females of reproductive age (15-49 years) having at least one child under 5 years. Data encompassing socio-demographic characteristics, anthropometric measures, and the health needs of mothers and children were collected using a structured questionnaire. The data were analyzed employing SPSS version 21, utilizing descriptive statistics and Pearson chi-square, and binary logistic regression at a 95% confidence interval.

RESULTS

In this study, 253 reproductive-age females and 371 children under 5 were examined. Critical community issues included unmet family planning needs (29.6%), maternal anemia (18.6%), and child malnutrition (28.6%). Concerns encompassed suboptimal drinking water practices (62.0%), child non-vaccination (19.1%), widespread ghutti use (84.9%), suboptimal birth spacing (25.7%), non-exclusive breastfeeding for the first six months (88.7%), and prelacteal feeding (66.8%). Analysis identified maternal anemia (AOR = 0.38; p = 0.010), nuclear family adoption (AOR = 2.049; p = 0.033), unhealthy water practices (AOR = 0.48; p = 0.023), and ghutti provision at birth (AOR = 0.37; p = 0.030) as pivotal predictors of child nutritional status.

CONCLUSION

In order to improve the overall health status of community, it is imperative to implement collective strategies tailored to the specific factors and challenges prevalent in the community. The results underscore the importance of maintaining the community-university partnership through establishing a dedicated Maternal and Child Health Center. These findings contribute to the growing body of knowledge in MCH research and inform evidence-based policies for enhanced health outcomes in similar contexts.

Assessment of a Geriatric Evaluation and Management in the Home (GEMITH) Service at a Quaternary Hospital: A Retrospective Observational Study

Background: The increasing aging population in Australia has created a higher demand for specialist geriatric services within hospitals. A Geriatric Evaluation and Management in the Home (GEMITH) service was implemented at a quaternary Queensland hospital. The GEMITH service was unique as it incorporated a specialist pharmacist into the multidisciplinary team. Objective: To determine the medication safety and quality impact of the GEMITH service by evaluating the type and clinical significance of specialist pharmacist interventions. Methods: This was retrospective observational study of clinical interventions made by the GEMITH pharmacist for patients admitted to the service between October 2020 to April 2021. All pharmacist interventions were rated for their clinical significance using the Society of Hospital Pharmacists of Australia (SHPA) risk classification system. The ratings were undertaken by a panel of three pharmacists that independently assessed the interventions, coming together for final discussion. A narrative analysis of the interventions were derived through group consensus. Results: There was a total of 119 admissions to the GEMITH service, with 132 clinical interventions made by the specialist geriatric pharmacist. The majority (47%) of interventions were considered as low risk interventions, although high- (21%) and extreme-risk (2%) interventions still occurred. The most common type of intervention (32%) involved medication reconciliation. Other intervention types included monitoring recommendations, dosing interventions, and deprescribing suggestions. Conclusion: Multiple clinical interventions were made by the GEMITH pharmacist, which prevented possible and significant medication-related harm. This demonstrated the quality impact of the specialist pharmacist in improving medication safety for geriatric patients.

Primary, allied health, selected specialists, and mental health service utilisation by home care recipients in Australia before and after accessing the care, 2017-2019

OBJECTIVES

To examine changes in primary, allied health, selected specialists, and mental health service utilisation by older people in the year before and after accessing home care package (HCP) services.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study using the Registry of Senior Australians Historical National Cohort (≥ 65 years old), including individuals accessing HCP services between 2017 and 2019 (N = 109,558), was conducted. The utilisation of general practice (GP) attendances, health assessments, chronic disease management plans, allied health services, geriatric, pain, palliative, and mental health services, subsidised by the Australian Government Medicare Benefits Schedule, was assessed in the 12 months before and after HCP access, stratified by HCP level (1-2 vs. 3-4, i.e., lower vs. higher care needs). Relative changes in service utilisation 12 months before and after HCP access were estimated using adjusted risk ratios (aRR) from Generalised Estimating Equation Poisson models.

RESULTS

Utilisation of health assessments (7-10.2%), chronic disease management plans (19.7-28.2%), and geriatric, pain, palliative, and mental health services (all ≤ 2.5%) remained low, before and after HCP access. Compared to 12 months prior to HCP access, 12 months after, GP after-hours attendances increased (HCP 1-2 from 6.95 to 7.5%, aRR = 1.07, 95% CI 1.03-1.11; HCP 3-4 from 7.76 to 9.32%, aRR = 1.20, 95%CI 1.13-1.28) and allied health services decreased (HCP 1-2 from 34.8 to 30.7%, aRR = 0.88, 95%CI 0.87-0.90; HCP levels 3-4 from 30.5 to 24.3%, aRR = 0.80, 95%CI 0.77-0.82).

CONCLUSIONS

Most MBS subsidised preventive, management and specialist services are underutilised by older people, both before and after HCP access and small changes are observed after they access HCP.

Cultural inclusivity and diversity in dementia friendly communities: An integrative review

People with dementia from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds often face poor health and social outcomes such as stigma, depression, and reduced help seeking behaviours. Dementia friendly communities have been shown to reduce stigma, and the gap in health and social outcomes for people impacted by dementia. Despite the large presence of established dementia friendly communities, their functioning in multicultural communities remains underexplored. The aim of this review was to identify the barriers and facilitators of cultural inclusivity to inform the development of a multicultural dementia friendly community. We systematically searched for academic and grey literature regarding existing and prospective age or dementia-friendly communities that engaged with culturally and linguistically diverse communities. Using the matrix method, data on the barriers and facilitators to engagement were extracted. Papers were analysed for common themes and findings were integrated in a narrative format. A total of 3,164 papers were identified, 11 of which met inclusion criteria. There were 6 dementia friendly communities in North America, 3 in Europe, 1 in Australia and 1 in Asia. Analyses revealed that barriers to cultural inclusivity were centered around the accessibility of services, sociocultural factors, and the environment, including issues such as low awareness of dementia and stigma, language barriers, isolation, and the inaccessibility of transport and buildings. Leveraging existing cultural leaders and social structures to target culturally and linguistically diverse populations and develop tailored dementia friendly initiatives were key facilitators. To foster cultural inclusivity in dementia friendly communities, a culturally specific lens that addresses these barriers and utilises facilitators must be applied from the design stage through to implementation and evaluation.