Nurses’ competence in recognition and management of delirium in older patients: development and piloting of a self-assessment tool

Ethical reflections of healthcare staff on 'consentless measures' in somatic care: A qualitative study

BackgroundMany patients in medical wards lack decision-making capacity and cannot provide valid consent. As a result, nurses and other healthcare professionals often face a dilemma: whether to neglect the medical needs of such patients, or provide healthcare interventions without obtaining valid consent. Previous studies have indicated that many interventions are provided without consent; however, there is insufficient knowledge about how staff in this context reason about the ethical dilemmas they encounter.AimTo explore the ethical reasons provided by nurses and other healthcare professionals in medical wards for and against providing healthcare interventions without patients' consent.Research designThe study employed a qualitative explorative design. Eight focus group interviews were held with 37 staff across five different professions, mainly nurses, at two Swedish hospitals. The material was subjected to qualitative analysis, following a Reflective Thematic Analysis framework.Ethical considerationsEthical approval for this study was obtained from the Swedish Ethical Review Authority. All participants were informed orally and in writing about the study's aims and its voluntary nature. No sensitive personal information was registered. Participants provided their oral consent to participate before the interviews took place.Findings/ResultsThematic analysis resulted in four main themes: Coercion is a bad word; Reasons to accept coercion; Coercion is part of ward culture, and Unacceptable coercion.ConclusionsParticipants overwhelmingly supported the current use of 'consentless measures' at the investigated wards. Most situations described either needed no justification, according to participants, or could be easily justified by reference to the benefit of the patient, the patient's poor decision-making capacity, or the benefit of others. A range of implicit, contextual, and institutional justifications were also given. Suboptimal ward culture was considered a prime driver of consentless measures and a force that compromises nurses' agency in the patient encounter.

Prioritization Patterns of Nurses in the Management of a Patient With Delirium: Results of a Q-Methodology Study

Nurses are required to decide on priorities; however, how they prioritize the interventions toward patients with delirium is still unclear. Therefore, expanding the knowledge on (a) how nurses prioritize interventions to manage episodes of delirium and (b) the underlying prioritization patterns were the aims of this study. The Q-methodology was applied in 2021. A systematic review to identify the recommended interventions for patients with delirium was performed, and a nominal group technique was used to select those interventions that are applicable in daily practice (35 out of 96 identified). Then, using a specific scenario, 56 clinical nurses working in hospital medical (n = 31), geriatric (n = 15), and postacute (n = 10) units were asked to order the 35 interventions (from -4 the lowest to +4 the highest priority) using a Q-sort table. Averages (confidence interval at 95%) were calculated at the group level, and a by-person factor analysis was applied to discover underlying patterns of prioritization at the overall and at the individual levels. At the group level, "Ensuring a safe environment (e.g., reducing bed height)" was ranked as the highest priority (2.29 out of four); at the individual level, three prioritization patterns accounting for a total variance of 50.21% have emerged: "Individual needs-oriented" (33.82% variance explained; 41 nurses); "Prevention-oriented" (8.47%; five nurses); and "Cognitive-oriented" (7.92%; six nurses). At the group level, nurses prioritize safety while caring for patients with delirium; however, at the individual level, they follow three different patterns of prioritization oriented toward diverse aspects, suggesting uncertainty in the actions to be taken-with potential implications for patients.

Comparative effectiveness of delirium recognition with and without a clinical decision assessment system on outcomes of hospitalized older adults: Cluster randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Early recognition of delirium is essential for effective management, but it often goes unrecognized, resulting in adverse outcomes. Clinical decision support systems can enhance adherence to guidelines and improve patient outcomes. We developed a mobile-based clinical decision assessment tool (3D-DST) based on the 3-minute diagnostic interview for confusion assessment method-defined delirium (3D-CAM). Implementing the 3D-DST may enhance delirium recognition and adherence to interventions among healthcare professionals, potentially improving outcomes in older adults.

OBJECTIVE

To test whether improved recognition of delirium could lead to better clinical outcomes in older adults.

DESIGN

A cluster randomized controlled trial with pair-matching.

SETTING

A tertiary geriatric hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients aged ≥65 years.

METHODS

Four general wards were paired and randomly assigned to the intervention group (two wards) or the control group (two wards). The intervention included routine delirium assessments by nurses using either the 3D-DST or the 3D-CAM, along with delirium prevention and intervention measures carried out by a multidisciplinary team. Outcomes measured included delirium incidence, duration, severity, length of stay, and adherence to the delirium assessment, prevention, and treatment protocol. A trained nursing researcher collected data on demographics, clinical characteristics, and primary and secondary outcomes.

RESULTS

211 eligible patients participated (106 in the intervention group and 105 in the control group), with 21 identified as delirium-positive using the 3D-DST. The median Charlson comorbidity index score among older adults in the intervention group was 1 (1-2), compared to 2 (1-3) in the control group (P = 0.032). Nurses' adherence to delirium assessment was significantly higher in the intervention group than in the control group (73 % vs. 31 %). The recognition rate of delirium among nurses was 89 % in the intervention group and 42 % in the control group. There were no statistically significant differences in delirium duration (6 [3-9] vs. 7 [2-14], P = 0.967), incidence (8.5 % vs. 11.4 %, P = 0.500), severity (2 [1-3] vs. 2 [1-4], P = 0.891) or length of hospital stay (15 [14-18] vs. 18 [13-22], P = 0.568) between the intervention and control groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The 3D-DST enhanced adherence to routine delirium recognition by nurses. However, effective strategies are urgently needed to strengthen multidisciplinary collaboration and enhance adherence to delirium management among healthcare professionals.

REGISTRATION

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, Identifier: ChiCTR1900028402.

Assessment of ICU nurses' competency towards delirium among critically ill patients

BACKGROUND

ICU nurses play a critical role in managing delirium in critically ill patients, yet their competency in this area remains under-explored.

AIM

To assess ICU nurses' competency including their knowledge, practice, and attitudes toward delirium among critically ill patients.

METHODS

A correlational descriptive study was conducted with 67 nurses in the medical intensive care unit at Suez Canal University Hospitals. Data was collected using an online survey and analyzed using descriptive statistics, ANOVA, and Pearson's correlation.

RESULTS

Nurses showed a moderate knowledge level (M = 8.55), a low practice level (M = 6.62), and positive attitudes (M = 21.65) toward ICU delirium. ANOVA results indicated significant differences in practice scores based on educational level, F (2, 64) = 3.361, p = .041, and in knowledge scores based on ICU experience, F(3, 63) = 6.455, p < .001. Nurses with Master of Science in Nursing (MSN) degrees had higher practice scores than those with diplomas or Bachelor of Science in Nursing (BSN) degrees. There were no significant differences in knowledge and attitude scores based on educational level or age. Gender differences were minimal, with male nurses slightly outperforming female nurses. Correlation analysis showed positive relationships between age, education, ICU experience, and ICU nurses' levels of knowledge and practice.

CONCLUSION

ICU nurses demonstrate a knowledge-practice gap in delirium management. Targeted educational interventions, mentorship programs, and a focus on practical skills are essential to enhance delirium care.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

These findings highlight the urgent need for comprehensive delirium education and training programs for ICU nurses. By improving nurses' knowledge and practice, healthcare organizations can significantly enhance the early detection, prevention, and management of delirium, ultimately leading to improved patient outcomes and reduced length of stay in the ICU.

Assessing Delirium in Patients With Neurological Diseases

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Delirium is a common complication during hospitalization. Its consequences are severe, including reduced function, delayed rehabilitation, dementia, institutionalization, and death. Assessing delirium in neurological patients can be challenging due to the impact of neurological deficits. Therefore, the aim was to investigate the agreement between 2 delirium screening tools, factors associated with delirium, and assessing delirium in neurological patients. METHODS: This prospective observational study was conducted in 2 neurological units, using daily delirium screening. Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist and 2 versions of the Confusion Assessment Method were used to asses delirium in adult patients without baseline dementia, alcohol/drug detoxification, or palliative care. Descriptive analyses determined the number of delirium scores, and the analytical analyses were logistic regressions and a κ coefficient. RESULTS: The agreement between the screening tools was found to be substantial (κ = 0.71). Logistic regression analysis showed that the risk factors for a positive delirium screening were home care before admission (Confusion Assessment Method: odds ratio [OR], 4.21 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.67-10.63]; Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist: OR, 6.14 [95% CI, 2.85-13.23]) and aphasia/dysarthria (Confusion Assessment Method: OR, 4.9 [95% CI, 1.32-6.81]; Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist: OR, 2.76 [95% CI, 1.3-5.87]). In total, 18.7% (n = 20/107) of the screening scores were positive. Specifically, the Confusion Assessment Method showed positive scores for 13.0% (n = 14/107) of participants, whereas the Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist showed positive scores for 16.8% (n = 18/107). CONCLUSION: The screening tools had a substantial degree of agreement. Therefore, nurses can use both screening tools to detect delirium in patients with neurological disorders. However, care should be taken in patients with aphasia to avoid misclassification with the Brief-Confusion Assessment Method. Moreover, special attention should be directed toward patients with language difficulties such as aphasia/dysarthria and those who received home care services before admission. These areas warrant further investigation in clinical practice and future studies.

Delirium in the United States: Results From the 2023 Cross-Sectional World Delirium Awareness Day Prevalence Study

BACKGROUND

Delirium is an acute brain dysfunction associated with an increased risk of mortality and future dementia.

OBJECTIVES

To describe the prevalence of clinically documented delirium in the United States on World Delirium Awareness Day 2023.

METHODS

This is a sub-analysis of a prospective, cross-sectional, online, international survey. All health care settings were eligible, with the exception of operating rooms and outpatient clinics. Health care clinicians, administrators, and researchers completed the survey. The primary outcome was the prevalence of clinically documented delirium at 8:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. on March 15, 2023. Secondary outcomes were related to health care delivery. Descriptive statistics are reported. Differences between unit types (non-intensive care unit vs intensive care unit) were examined for all outcomes.

RESULTS

Ninety-one hospital units reported on 1318/1213 patients. The prevalence of clinically documented delirium was 16.4% (n = 216/1318) at 8:00 a.m. and 17.9% (n = 217/1213) at 8:00 p.m. (P = 0.316) and significantly differed between age groups, reported discipline, unit, and hospital types. Significant differences were identified between non-intensive care unit and intensive care unit settings in the use of delirium-related protocols, nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic management, educational processes, and barriers to evidence-based delirium care.

CONCLUSIONS

To our knowledge, this is the first epidemiologic survey of clinically documented delirium across two time points in the United States. Delirium remains a significant burden and challenge for health care systems. The high percentage of units using delirium management protocols suggests administrator and clinician awareness of evidence-based strategies for its detection and mitigation. We provide recommendations for future studies and quality improvement projects to improve clinical recognition and management of delirium.

Nurses' perception of uncertainty in clinical decision-making: A qualitative study

Background

Uncertainty is a common challenge for nurses in clinical decision-making, which can compromise patient care quality and safety. To address this issue, it is essential to understand how nurses perceive and cope with uncertainty in their practice.

Aim

This study aimed to explore nurses' perceptions of uncertainty in clinical decision-making using a qualitative approach.

Methods

This study was conducted with a qualitative approach and conventional content analysis in 2020. Participants consisted of 17 nurses from different wards of teaching hospitals in Northwestern Iran, recruited using the purposive sampling method. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews and analyzed simultaneously with data collection (June to December 2020). The data were analyzed using the content analysis approach suggested by Wildemuth. Data were managed with MAXQDA10 software. The analysis revealed four main themes and ten subthemes that described the nurses' experiences of uncertainty in clinical decision-making.

Results

The main themes were: difficult choice, difficult situation, insufficient judgment, and emotional burden.

Conclusions

The study participants defined uncertainty in clinical decision-making as a difficult choice that occurs in difficult situations, which influenced their clinical judgment and emotional well-being. These findings provide valuable insights for developing interventions to help nurses manage uncertainty and improve their decision-making skills and safety.

Reasons influencing the nurses' prioritization process while preventing and managing delirium: findings from a qualitative study

BACKGROUND

Nurses play an important role in the prevention and management of delirium episodes. However, some studies have reported that not all interventions recommended are applied due to time and resource constraints, resulting in patients receiving less care than required because other patients and/or interventions are prioritised. The concept of prioritization is part of the broader concept of decision-making as the ability to choose between two or more alternatives to ensure patient safety. Understanding the reasons influencing the prioritization process in patients at risk or with delirium may inform interventions to prevent and/or minimise the unfinished nursing care.

AIM

The purpose of this study was to explore the reasons that inform the prioritisation process among nurses when they are challenged to make decisions for patients at risk and with delirium.

METHODS

A descriptive qualitative study performed according to the COnsolidated criteria for Reporting guidelines, in 2021. An intentional sample of nurses working full-time with older patients in medical, geriatric, and post-acute care facilities affiliated with the National Health System was involved. Semi-structured interviews were conducted and narratives thematic analysed.

RESULTS

A total of 56 nurses (55.4% in internal medicine, 26.8% in geriatrics and 17.8% in post-acute/intermediate care) participated with an average age of 31.6 years. The reasons informing the prioritisation process while providing preventive or managerial interventions towards a patient at risk of or with delirium are set at three levels: (1) unit level, as reasons belong to the inadequacy of the 'Environment', the 'Human Resources', and the 'Organisation and Work Processes', (2) nurse's level, as issues in 'Competencies' and 'Attitudes' possessed, and (3) patient level, due to the 'Multidimensional Frailty'.

CONCLUSION

Nurses caring for patients at risk of and with delirium face several challenges in providing care. To prioritise preventive and managerial interventions, it is essential to implement multilevel and multifaced organizational and educational strategies.

Bringing Delirium to Light: Impact of CAM-ICU Tool to Improve Care Coordination

BACKGROUND

Delirium is a serious complication in patients in the critical care unit (CCU) that may lead to prolonged hospitalization if left undetected. The CCU at our hospital does not have a framework for determining delirium that could affect patient outcomes and discharge planning.

PRIMARY PRACTICE SETTING

CCU in a community hospital.

METHOD

A posttest-only design was used for this study. We established a framework for the early assessment of delirium, educated and trained nurses to detect delirium, collaborated with the informatics department, intensivist, nursing, respiratory therapy and worked with case management to deploy the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU). We used a one-tailed independent t test to determine the impact of CAM-ICU on length of stay (LOS). Cross-tabulation and chi-square tests were used to examine the impact of CAM-ICU tool on home care utilization between the intervention and comparison groups.

RESULTS

There was a 3.12% reduction in LOS after implementing the CAM-ICU tool. Also, a reduction in home care service utilization demonstrated statistical significance ( p = .001) between the intervention group (62.5%; n = 177) and the comparison group (37.5%; n = 106).

IMPLICATIONS FOR CASE MANAGEMENT PRACTICE

Case managers are essential in improving care transitions. Case managers need to become competent in understanding the implications of the CAM-ICU tool because of their relevant role in the multidisciplinary rounds as advocates to improve care transitions across the continuum of care. Case managers need to have an understanding on how to escalate when changes in the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale scores occur during the multidisciplinary rounds because it can affect care coordination throughout the hospital.

CONCLUSIONS

Implementing the CAM-ICU decreased LOS, and reduced health care utilization. The early identification of patients with delirium can affect the outcomes of critically ill patients and entails multidisciplinary collaboration.

Nurses prioritization processes to prevent delirium in patients at risk: Findings from a Q-Methodology study

BACKGROUND

This study aimed at (a) exploring how nurses prioritise interventions to prevent delirium among patients identified at risk and (b) describing the underlying prioritisation patterns according to nurses' individual characteristics.

METHODS

There was used the Q-methodology a research process following specific steps: (a) identifying the concourse, (b) the Q-sample, and (c) the population (P-set); (d) collecting data using the Q-sort table; (e) entering the data and performing the factor analysis; and (f) interpreting the factors identified.

RESULTS

There were involved 56 nurses working in medical, geriatric and log-term facilities (46; 82.2 %). The preventive intervention receiving the highest priority was 'Monitoring the vital parameters (heart rate, blood pressure, oxygen saturation)' (2.96 out of 4 as the highest priority; CI 95 %: 2.57, 3.36). Two priority patterns emerged among nurses (explained variance 44.78 %), one 'Clinical-oriented' (36.19 %) and one 'Family/caregiver-oriented' (8.60 %) representing 53 nurses out 56.

CONCLUSION

Alongside the overall tendency to prioritise some preventive interventions instead of others, the priorities are polarised in two main patterns expressing two main individual characteristics of nurses. Knowing the existence of individual patterns and their aggregation informs how to shape educational interventions.

A qualitative study of geriatric specialist nurses' experiences to navigate delirium in the elderly

BACKGROUND

The experiences and perceptions of geriatric specialist nurses are pivotal to understanding the complexities of managing delirium and to developing effective nursing interventions. This qualitative study aims to explore these experiences and perceptions to inform the enhancement of clinical geriatric nursing and care practices.

METHODS

Utilizing a qualitative exploratory design, this research engaged a convenience sample of geriatric specialist nurses at a tertiary hospital in Shanghai, China through focus groups and semi-structured interviews. Data were rigorously analyzed using Colaizzi's phenomenological method, which facilitated the identification of themes that emerged from the narratives of the geriatric specialist nurses.

RESULTS

The thematic analysis yielded three major themes that encapsulate the nurses' experiences and perceptions. Theme 1: Understanding of Delirium, highlighted the nurses' awareness of the condition's significance, yet it was often deprioritized due to the pressing demands of managing more acute and immediately life-threatening conditions. Theme 2: Barriers in Application, brought to light the multifaceted challenges faced by nurses, including language barriers, the frequency and consistency of delirium assessments, the social determinants of health, and the nurses' own competencies in assessment. Theme 3: Evolution of Nursing Approaches, detailed the adaptive strategies employed by nurses, such as managing nursing adverse events, improving communication with patients' families, and adopting a proactive stance towards long-term patient outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings suggest that while geriatric specialist nurses recognize the importance of delirium assessment, there are several barriers to effective application. The study underscores the imperative for the advancement of more refined delirium assessment and care protocols, tailored to address the unique requirements of geriatric nursing care.

Nursing Intervention to Prevent and Manage Delirium in Critically Ill Patients: A Scoping Review

Delirium is an acute neuropsychiatric syndrome of multifactorial etiology with a high incidence in people admitted to intensive care units. In addition to reversible impairment of cognitive processes, it may be associated with changes in thinking and perception. If, in the past, it was considered an expected complication of severe disease, nowadays, delirium is associated with a poor short-term and long-term prognosis. Knowing that its prevention and early identification can reduce morbidity, mortality, and health costs, it is vital to investigate nursing interventions focused on delirium in critically ill patients. This study aimed to identify nursing interventions in the prevention and management of delirium in critically ill adults. The method used to answer the research question was a scoping review. The literature search was performed in the Medline (via PubMed), CINAHL (via EBSCOhost), Scopus, Web of Science, and JBI databases. The final sample included 15 articles. Several categories of non-pharmacological interventions were identified, addressing the modifiable risk factors that contribute to the development of delirium, and for which nurses have a privileged position in their minimization. No drug agent can, by itself, prevent or treat delirium. However, psychoactive drugs are justified to control hyperactive behaviors through cautious use. Early diagnosis, prevention, or treatment can reduce symptoms and improve the individual's quality of life. Therefore, nursing professionals must ensure harmonious coordination between non-pharmacological and pharmacological strategies.

Validation of a viable delirium detection test performed by nurses and physicians during routine patient care

BACKGROUND

Delirium is a frequent mental impairment in geriatric patients hospitalized in acute care facilities. It carries a high risk of complications and is often the first symptom of acute illness. It is clearly important to identify the development of delirium at an early stage, and several short and effective diagnostic tests have been developed and validated for this purpose. Despite this, patients on hospital wards are seldom monitored for signs of emergent delirium, suggesting that compliance with guidelines would be improved by introducing a simpler and more user-friendly test.

METHODS

We recently implemented a simple delirium assessment tool, called RMA that can be introduced into the daily routine of ward staff without significantly adding to their workload. The nurses noted their impression of the patient's cognitive state in the electronic medical record, and during the morning round the ward physician administered a short attention test to any patients suspected of new cognitive impairment. In this study, we compared RMA test against the widely used and well validated 4AT.

RESULTS

RMA performed daily by the ward staff was found to be non-inferior to 4AT performed by an experienced rater. Compared to 4AT, R&M had a sensitivity of 93.9% and a specificity of 98.3%. An Altman-Bland plot indicated that both tests can be used interchangeably.

CONCLUSIONS

The RMA test is reliable, easy to administer, likely to boost compliance with guidelines, and is expected to raise awareness of delirium among the nurses and physicians directly involved in the diagnostic process.

Development and Usability Testing of a Mobile App-Based Clinical Decision Support System for Delirium: Randomized Crossover Trial

Background

The 3-Minute Diagnostic Interview for Confusion Assessment Method-Defined Delirium (3D-CAM) is an instrument specially developed for the assessment of delirium in general wards, with high reported sensitivity and specificity. However, the use of the 3D-CAM by bedside nurses in routine practice showed relatively poor usability, with multiple human errors during assessment.

Objective

This study aimed to develop a mobile app-based delirium assessment tool based on the 3D-CAM and evaluate its usability among older patients by bedside nurses.

Methods

The Delirium Assessment Tool With Decision Support Based on the 3D-CAM (3D-DST) was developed to address existing issues of the 3D-CAM and optimize the assessment process. Following a randomized crossover design, questionnaires were used to evaluate the usability of the 3D-DST among older adults by bedside nurses. Meanwhile, the performances of both the 3D-DST and the 3D-CAM paper version, including the assessment completion rate, time required for completing the assessment, and the number of human errors made by nurses during assessment, were recorded, and their differences were compared.

Results

The 3D-DST included 3 assessment modules, 9 evaluation interfaces, and 16 results interfaces, with built-in reminders to guide nurses in completing the delirium assessment. In the usability testing, a total of 432 delirium assessments (216 pairs) on 148 older adults were performed by 72 bedside nurses with the 3D-CAM paper version and the 3D-DST. Compared to the 3D-CAM paper version, the mean usability score was significantly higher when using the 3D-DST (4.35 vs 3.40; P<.001). The median scores of the 6 domains of the satisfactory evaluation questionnaire for nurses using the 3D-CAM paper version and the 3D-DST were above 2.83 and 4.33 points, respectively (P<.001). The average time for completing the assessment reduced by 2.1 minutes (4.4 vs 2.3 min; P<.001) when the 3D-DST was used.

Conclusions

This study demonstrated that the 3D-DST significantly improved the efficiency of delirium assessment and was considered highly acceptable by bedside nurses.

Development and Validation of an ICU Delirium Playbook for Provider Education

Although delirium detection and prevention practices are recommended in critical care guidelines, there remains a persistent lack of effective delirium education for ICU providers. To address this knowledge-practice gap, we developed an "ICU Delirium Playbook" to educate providers on delirium detection (using the Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU) and prevention.

DESIGN

Building on our previous ICU Delirium Video Series, our interdisciplinary team developed a corresponding quiz to form a digital "ICU Delirium Playbook." Playbook content validity was evaluated by delirium experts, and face validity by an ICU nurse focus group. Additionally, focus group participants completed the quiz before and after video viewing. Remaining focus group concerns were evaluated in semi-structured follow-up interviews.

SETTING

Online validation survey, virtual focus group, and virtual interviews.

SUBJECTS

The validation group included six delirium experts in the fields of critical care, geriatrics, nursing, and ICU education. The face validation group included nine ICU nurses, three of whom participated in the semi-structured feedback interviews.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The 44-question quiz had excellent content validity (average scale-level content validity index [S-CVI] of individual items = 0.99, universal agreement S-CVI = 0.93, agreement κ ≥ 0.75, and clarity p ≥ 0.8). The focus group participants completed the Playbook in an average (sd) time of 53 (14) minutes, demonstrating significant improvements in pre-post quiz scores (74% vs 86%; p = 0.0009). Verbal feedback highlighted the conciseness, utility, and relevance of the Playbook, with all participants agreeing to deploy the digital education module in their ICUs.

CONCLUSIONS

The ICU Delirium Playbook is a novel, first-of-its-kind asynchronous digital education tool aimed to standardize delirium detection and prevention practices. After a rigorous content and face validation process, the Playbook is now available for widespread use.

Delirium in the intensive care unit and its importance in the post-operative context: A review

The burden of delirium in the intensive care setting is a global priority. Delirium affects up to 80% of patients in intensive care units; an episode of delirium is often distressing to patients and their families, and delirium in patients within, or outside of, the intensive care unit (ICU) setting is associated with poor outcomes. In the short term, such poor outcomes include longer stay in intensive care, longer hospital stay, increased risk of other hospital-acquired complications, and increased risk of hospital mortality. Longer term sequelae include cognitive impairment and functional dependency. While medical category of admission may be a risk factor for poor outcomes in critical care populations, outcomes for surgical ICU admissions are also poor, with dependency at hospital discharge exceeding 30% and increased risk of in-hospital mortality, particularly in vulnerable groups, with high-risk procedures, and resource-scarce settings. A practical approach to delirium prevention and management in the ICU setting is likely to require a multi-faceted approach. Given the good evidence for the prevention of delirium among older post-operative outside of the intensive care setting, simple non-pharmacological interventions should be effective among older adults post-operatively who are cared for in the intensive care setting. In response to this, the future ICU environment will have a range of organizational and distinct environmental characteristics that are directly targeted at preventing delirium.