Albumin losses during hemodiafiltration: all dialyzers are not created equal - a case report

Effects of Replacing Intradialytic Parenteral Nutrition by Oral Nutritional Supplements and Polyester-Polyarylate Membrane on Nutritional Status in Maintenance Hemodialysis Patients with End-Stage Kidney Disease

Introduction

In patients receiving hemodialysis, protein-energy wasting may be frequent and is associated with nutritional and metabolic alterations. This study aimed to describe the effects of a new therapeutic strategy, i.e., oral nutritional supplements (ONS) associated with a polyester-polyarylate (PEPA) membrane, on nutritional markers in high-risk patients with intradialytic parenteral nutrition (IDPN) history.

Methods

Patients, who received individually IDPN (M-6 to M0) then ONS (M0 to M6), were followed over a 12-month period.

Results

There was no change in serum albumin over time. The BMI increased between M-6 and M6. Food intake showed increase between M0 and M3. Quality-of-life score was stable between M0 and M6. None of the adverse events was judged related to ONS, PEPA, or research procedure.

Conclusion

This study focusing on a new therapeutic strategy composed of ONS and PEPA membrane replacing IDPN to maintain nutritional markers in high-risk patients receiving hemodialysis might warrant further research with robust methodology.

Most recently developed polyester polymer alloy dialyzer: A new medium cut-off membrane?

BACKGROUND

New versions of the polyester polymer alloy (PEPA) membrane have appeared over the years, with increases in both the pore size and the amount of polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) to optimize hydrophilicity performance. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of the most recently developed PEPA dialyzer, the FDY series, in hemodialysis (HD) modality in terms of uremic toxin removal and albumin loss and to compare it with that of several high-flux dialyzers currently used in HD and post-dilution hemodiafiltration (HDF) treatments.

METHODS

A prospective study was carried out in 21 patients. All patients underwent six dialysis sessions with the same routine dialysis parameters; only the dialyzer and/or the dialysis modality varied: FX80 in HD, FDY 180 in HD, Clearum HS17 in HDF, Elisio 19H in HDF, Vitapes 180 in HDF, and FX80 in post-dilution HDF. The reduction ratios (RR) of urea, creatinine, ß2-microglobulin, myoglobin, κFLC, prolactin, α1-microglobulin, α1-acid glycoprotein, λFLC, and albumin were compared intraindividually. Dialysate albumin loss was also measured.

RESULTS

Both membranes FDY and FX80 are high-flux dialyzers and are applied here in high-flux HD. The average RR of β2-microglobulin was slightly lower in the two HD treatments than in the HDF treatments. Comparison of dialysis treatments revealed that the PEPA FDY dialyzer in the HD modality was more effective than the FX80 dialyzer in high-flux HD and was as effective as post-dilution HDF, especially in terms of myoglobin, κFLC, prolactin, α1-microglobulin, and λFLC RRs. The FDY treatments obtained similar albumin RR in blood and slightly higher dialysate albumin loss, although the values were clinically acceptable.

CONCLUSIONS

The most recently developed PEPA dialyzers in the HD modality were as effective as all treatments in the HDF modality and were clearly superior to high-flux helixone HD treatment. These results confirm that this dialyzer should be categorized within the medium cut-off (MCO) membrane classification.

On the total albumin losses during haemocatharsis

Excessive albumin losses during HC (haemocatharsis) are considered a potential cause of hypoalbuminemia-a key risk factor for mortality. This review on total albumin losses considers albumin "leaking" into the dialysate and losses due to protein/membrane interactions (i.e. adsorption, "secondary membrane formation" and denaturation). The former are fairly easy to determine, usually varying at the level of ~ 2 g to ~ 7 g albumin loss per session. Such values, commonly accepted as representative of the total albumin losses, are often quoted as limits/standards of permissible albumin loss per session. On albumin mass lost due to adsorption/deposition, which is the result of complicated interactions and rather difficult to determine, scant in vivo data exist and there is great uncertainty and confusion regarding their magnitude; this is possibly responsible for neglecting their contribution to the total losses at present. Yet, many relevant in vitro studies suggest that losses of albumin due to protein/membrane interactions are likely comparable to (or even greater than) those due to leaking, particularly in the currently favoured high-convection HDF (haemodiafiltration) treatment. Therefore, it is emphasised that top research priority should be given to resolve these issues, primarily by developing appropriate/facile in vivo test-methods and related analytical techniques.

Latest Trends in Hemodiafiltration

This review provides a detailed analysis of hemodiafiltration (HDF), its progress from an emerging technique to a potential conventional treatment for chronic hemodialysis patients, and its current status. The article covers the advances, methods, and clinical benefits of HDF, specifically focusing on its impact on cardiovascular health, survival rates, and overall well-being. The review also addresses questions about the safety of HDF and provides evidence to dispel concerns related to the elimination of beneficial substances and infection risks. Additionally, the article explores the potential implications of expanded hemodialysis (HDx) as an alternative to HDF, its classification, safety profile, and an ongoing trial assessing its non-inferiority to HDF. Supported by evidence from randomized controlled trials and observational studies, the review emphasizes the superiority of HDF as a hemodialysis modality and advocates for its positioning as the gold standard in treatment. However, it acknowledges the need for extensive research to define the role of HDx in comprehensive treatment approaches in individuals undergoing dialysis. The synthesis of current knowledge underscores the importance of ongoing exploration and research to refine hemodialysis practices for optimal patient outcomes.

Unveiling the Clinical Benefits of High-Volume Hemodiafiltration: Optimizing the Removal of Medium-Weight Uremic Toxins and Beyond

Dialysis treatment has improved the survival of patients with kidney failure. However, the hospitalization and mortality rates remain alarmingly high, primarily due to incomplete uremic toxin elimination. High-volume hemodiafiltration (HDF) has emerged as a promising approach that significantly improves patient outcomes by effectively eliminating medium and large uremic toxins, which explains its increasing adoption, particularly in Europe and Japan. Interest in this therapy has grown following the findings of the recently published CONVINCE study, as well as the need to understand the mechanisms behind the benefits. This comprehensive review aims to enhance the scientific understanding by explaining the underlying physiological mechanisms that contribute to the positive effects of HDF in terms of short-term benefits, like hemodynamic tolerance and cardiovascular disease. Additionally, it explores the rationale behind the medium-term clinical benefits, including phosphorus removal, the modulation of inflammation and oxidative stress, anemia management, immune response modulation, nutritional effects, the mitigation of bone disorders, neuropathy relief, and amyloidosis reduction. This review also analyzes the impact of HDF on patient-reported outcomes and mortality. Considering the importance of applying personalized uremic toxin removal strategies tailored to the unique needs of each patient, high-volume HDF appears to be the most effective treatment to date for patients with renal failure. This justifies the need to prioritize its application in clinical practice, initially focusing on the groups with the greatest potential benefits and subsequently extending its use to a larger number of patients.

Hemodiafiltration: Technical and Medical Insights

Despite the significant medical and technical improvements in the field of dialytic renal replacement modalities, morbidity and mortality are excessively high among patients with end-stage kidney disease, and most interventional studies yielded disappointing results. Hemodiafiltration, a dialysis method that was implemented in clinics many years ago and that combines the two main principles of hemodialysis and hemofiltration-diffusion and convection-has had a positive impact on mortality rates, especially when delivered in a high-volume mode as a surrogate for a high convective dose. The achievement of high substitution volumes during dialysis treatments does not only depend on patient characteristics but also on the dialyzer (membrane) and the adequately equipped hemodiafiltration machine. The present review article summarizes the technical aspects of online hemodiafiltration and discusses present and ongoing clinical studies with regards to hard clinical and patient-reported outcomes.

Efficacy and Safety of the Medium Cut-Off Elisio HX Dialyzer

INTRODUCTION

The medium cut-off Elisio HX dialyzer by Nipro became commercially available in Europe in 2021, but there are still no reports of in vivo data. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of it compared with previously evaluated hemodialysis (HD), expanded HD (HDx), and postdilution hemodiafiltration (HDF) treatments.

METHODS

A prospective study was carried out on 18 patients who underwent 5 dialysis sessions: FX80 Cordiax in HD, Elisio H19 in HD, Elisio HX19 in HDx, Theranova 400 in HDx, and FX80 Cordiax in HDF. The reduction ratios of urea, creatinine, ß2-microglobulin, myoglobin, kappa FLC, prolactin, α1-microglobulin, α1-acid glycoprotein, lambda FLC, and albumin were compared. Dialysate albumin loss was measured.

RESULTS

The comparison between the different dialysis modalities revealed no difference for small molecules, but HDx and HDF were significantly more efficient than HD for medium and large molecule removal. The efficacy of Elisio HX19 dialyzer in HDx was similar to the Theranova 400, superior to both dialyzers in HD, and slightly lower than HDF. Albumin losses in dialysate with HD dialyzers were less than 1 g, but between 1.5 and 2.5 g in HDx and HDF. The global removal score (GRS) values with HDx treatments were statistically significantly higher than those with HD. The highest GRS was obtained with the helixone dialyzer in HDF.

CONCLUSIONS

The new MCO dialyzer, Elisio HX, performs with excellent behavior and tolerance. It represents an upgrade compared to their predecessor and is very close to the removal capacity of HDF treatment.

Comparison of four medium cut-off dialyzers

BACKGROUND

Recently, several pharmaceutical companies have developed new medium cut-off (MCO) dialyzers for expanded hemodialysis (HDx). This study aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of four MCO dialyzers, against each other and versus high-flux hemodialysis (HD) and post-dilution hemodiafiltration (HDF).

METHODS

A prospective study was carried out on 23 patients who underwent six dialysis sessions: two sessions with the FX80 Cordiax in HD and HDF, and four HDx sessions with the Phylther 17-SD, Vie-18X, Elisio HX19 and Theranova 400 dialyzers. The reduction ratios (RRs) of urea, creatinine, β2-microglobulin, myoglobin, kappa free immunoglobulin light chain (κFLC), prolactin, α1-microglobulin, α1-acid glycoprotein, lambda (λFLC) and albumin were compared. Dialysate albumin loss was also measured.

RESULTS

The differences in efficacy between the evaluated dialyzers were minimal in small molecules and even up to the size of β2-microglobulin. The main differences were found between myoglobin, κFLC, prolactin, α1-microglobulin and λFLC RRs, in which all four MCO dialyzers, with similar efficacy, were clearly superior to HD and slightly inferior to HDF treatment. Albumin losses in the dialysate with HD dialyzers were <1 g and between 1.5 and 2.5 g in HDx and HDF. The global removal score values were similar in all four HDx treatments, and again significantly higher than those with HD.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the four MCO dialyzers evaluated in this study showed good efficiency, with no significant performance differences between them while being completely safe in terms of albumin loss. Likewise, the study confirms the superiority of HDx over high-flux HD with an efficacy close to that of post-dilution HDF.

Prognostic Roles of Inflammation- and Nutrition-Based Indicators for Female Patients with Cancer

Purpose

The incidence, progression, and prognosis of cancer could be affected by inflammation and nutrition. Female patients have different inflammatory and nutritional states depending on their age and tumor types. It is important to screen for suitable prognostic indicators in female patients with cancer of different ages and tumor types.

Patients and Methods

Baseline clinicopathologic and laboratory characteristics of 1502 female patients with cancer were obtained from a multicenter cohort study. Concordance indices (C-indices) were used to evaluate the prediction accuracy of following inflammation- and nutrition-based indicators: advanced lung cancer inflammation index (ALI), systemic immune inflammation index (SII), modified geriatric nutritional risk index (mGNRI), albumin-to-globulin ratio (AGR), prognostic nutritional index (PNI), lymphocyte-to-C-reactive protein ratio (LCR), controlling nutritional status score (CONUT), modified Glasgow prognostic score (mGPS), and lymphocyte-to-C-reactive protein score (LCS).

Results

The most suitable indicators in different female populations with cancer had C-indices as follows: LCR (0.668; 95% CI, 0.644–0.693) for all females; AGR (0.681; 95% CI, 0.619–0.743) for young females; LCR (0.667; 95% CI, 0.628–0.706) for middle-aged females; ALI (0.597; 95% CI, 0.574–0.620) for elderly females; LCR (0.684; 95% CI, 0.621–0.747) for females with reproductive system cancer; and ALI (0.652; 95% CI, 0.624–0.680) for females with non-reproductive system cancer.

Conclusion

The most suitable indicators for the different female populations with cancer are summarized as follows: LCR for all females, AGR for young females, LCR for middle-aged females, ALI for elderly females, LCR for females with reproductive system cancer, and ALI for females with non-reproductive system cancer.

Hemodiafiltration (HDF) versus expanded hemodialysis (HDx)

Medium cutoff (MCO) membranes have resulted in a novel dialyzer class designed to improve membrane permeability and have been postulated as an alternative to online hemodiafiltration since MCO membranes may achieve similar solute clearances. These membranes have been incorporated into clinical practice, and the term expanded HD (HDx) has been proposed to differentiate from high-flux hemodialysis. Efficacy, safety, and quality of life comparison of HDF versus HDx have been reviewed in this article.

Effects of Medium Cut-Off Versus High-Flux Hemodialysis Membranes on Biomarkers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Medium cut-off (MCO) membranes enhance large middle-molecule clearance while selectively retaining molecules >45 000 Da.

OBJECTIVES

We undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the effects of MCO versus high-flux membranes on biomarkers.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science from January 2015 to July 2020, and gray literature sources from 2017. We included randomized (RS) and nonrandomized studies (NRS) comparing MCO and high-flux membranes in adults (>18 years) receiving maintenance hemodialysis. We performed study selection, data extraction, and quality appraisals in duplicate and used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation framework. Outcomes included solute removal (plasma clearance or dialysate quantitation), reduction ratios, and predialysis serum concentrations for a range of prespecified large middle molecules.

RESULTS

We identified 26 eligible studies (10 RS and 16 NRS; N = 1883 patients; patient-years = 1366.3). The mean difference (MD) for albumin removal was 2.31 g per session (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.79 to 1.83; high certainty), with a reduction in predialysis albumin of -0.12 g/dl (95% CI, -0.16 to -0.07; I 2 = 0%; high certainty) in the first 24 weeks, returning to normal (MD = -0.02 g/dl, 95% CI, -0.07 to -0.03; I 2 = 56%; high certainty) after 24 weeks. We also found with high certainty that MCO dialysis resulted in a large increase (standardized mean difference [SMD]> 2.0 for all) in β2-microglobulin, κ- and λ-free light chains, and myoglobin removal, resulting in moderate (SMD > 0.5) to large (SMD > 0.8) reductions in predialysis concentrations for all of these solutes. Medium cut-off dialysis increased the reduction ratio for tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) by 7.7% (95% CI, 4.7 to 10.6; moderate certainty), and reduced predialysis TNF-α by SMD -0.48 (95% CI, -0.91 to -0.04; moderate certainty). We found with moderate certainty that MCO dialysis had little to no effect on predialysis interleukin-6 (IL-6) plasma concentrations. Medium cut-off dialysis reduced mRNA expression of TNF-α and IL-6 in peripheral leukocytes by MD -15% (95% CI, -19.6 to -10.4; moderate certainty) and -8.8% (95% CI, -10.2 to -7.4; moderate certainty), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Medium cut-off dialysis increases the clearance of a wide range of large middle molecules and likely reduces inflammatory mediators with a concomitant transient reduction in serum albumin concentration. The net effect of MCO dialysis on large middle molecules could translate into important clinical effects.

Renal hemofiltration prevents metabolic acidosis and reduces inflammation during normothermic machine perfusion of the vascularized composite allograft-A preclinical study

INTRODUCTION

Recent experimental evidence suggests normothermic machine perfusion of the vascularized composite allograft results in improved preservation compared to static cold storage, with less reperfusion injury in the immediate post-operative period. However, metabolic acidosis is a common feature of vascularized composite allograft perfusion, primarily due to the inability to process metabolic by-products. We evaluated the impact of combined limb-kidney perfusion on markers of metabolic acidosis and inflammation in a porcine model.

METHODS

Ten paired pig forelimbs were used for this study, grouped as either limb-only (LO, n = 5) perfusion, or limb-kidney (LK, n = 5) perfusion. Infrared thermal imaging was used to determine homogeneity of perfusion. Lactate, bicarbonate, base, pH, and electrolytes, along with an inflammatory profile generated via the quantification of cytokines and cell-free DNA in the perfusate were recorded.

RESULTS

The addition of a kidney to a limb perfusion circuit resulted in the rapid stabilization of lactate, bicarbonate, base, and pH. Conversely, the LO circuit became progressively acidotic, correlating in a significant increase in pro-inflammatory cytokines. Global perfusion across the limb was more homogenous with LK compared to LO.

CONCLUSION

The addition of a kidney during limb perfusion results in significant improvements in perfusate biochemistry, with no evidence of metabolic acidosis.

Mixed versus predilution hemodiafiltration effects on convection volume and small and middle molecule clearance in hemodialysis patients: a prospective randomized controlled trial

Background

The use of newly developed mixed-dilution hemodiafiltration (HDF) can supplement the weaknesses of pre- and postdilution HDF. However, it is unclear whether mixed-HDF performs well compared to predilution HDF.

Methods

We conducted a prospective, open-labeled, randomized controlled trial from two hemodialysis centers in Korea. Between January 2017 and September 2019, 60 patients who underwent chronic hemodialysis were randomly assigned at a 1:1 ratio to receive either predilution HDF (n = 30) or mixed-HDF (n = 30) for 6 months. We compared convection volume, changes in small- and medium-sized molecule clearance, high-sensitive C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) level, and dialysis-related parameters between the two dialysis modalities.

Results

A mean effective convection volume of 41.0 ± 10.3 L/session in the predilution HDF group and 51.5 ± 9.0 L/session in the mixed-HDF group was obtained by averaging values of three time-points. The difference in effective convection volume between the groups was 10.5 ± 1.3 L/session. This met the preset noninferiority criteria, suggesting that mixed-HDF was noninferior to predilution HDF. Moreover, the β2-microglobulin reduction rate was greater in the mixed-HDF group than in the predilution HDF group, while mixed-HDF provided greater transmembrane pressure. There were no significant between-group differences in Kt/V urea levels, changes in predialysis hs-CRP levels, proportions of overhydration, or blood pressure values. Symptomatic intradialytic hypotension episodes and other adverse events occurred similarly in the two groups.

Conclusion

Use of mixed-HDF was comparable to predilution HDF in terms of delivered convection volume and clinical parameters. Moreover, mixed-HDF provided better β2-microglobulin clearance than predilution HDF.

Efficacy and safety of the Clearum dialyzer

The Clearum dialyzer, built by Medtronic, became commercially available in several European countries in 2020, but there are still no reports of in vivo data. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and risk of hypoalbuminemia of this dialyzer compared with previously evaluated hemodialysis (HD), expanded hemodialysis (HDx), and postdilution hemodiafiltration (HDF) treatments. A prospective study was carried out in 15 patients. Each patient underwent seven dialysis sessions: FX80 Cordiax in HD, Clearum HS17 in HD, Phylther 17-SD in HDx, Theranova 400 in HDx, Phylther 17-G in postdilution HDF, Clearum HS17 in postdilution HDF, and FX80 Cordiax in postdilution HDF. The reduction ratios of urea, creatinine, ß₂ -microglobulin, myoglobin, prolactin, α₁ -microglobulin, α₁ -acid glycoprotein, and albumin were compared intraindividually. Dialysate albumin loss was also measured. Comparison of dialysis techniques revealed no differences between small molecules, but HDx and HDF were significantly higher than HD with medium and large molecular weights. The Clearum dialyzer in HDF obtained similar results to FX80 Cordiax in HDF, was slightly superior to Phylther 17-G in HDF, and was statistically superior to both dialyzers in HDx. Albumin losses with the Clearum dialyzer were among the lowest, both in HD and HDF treatments. The highest global removal score (GRS) values were obtained with the helixone and Clearum dialyzers in HDF, with similar results both in HD and HDF. In addition, the GRS values with HDx treatments were statistically significantly higher than those with HD. The new Clearum dialyzer has excellent behavior and tolerance in HD and HDF. Its adequate permeability has been proven with its maximal performance in HDF, which could represent an upgrade versus its predecessor polyphenylene dialyzers.

Modeling the transfer of low molecular weight plasma proteins during hemodialysis and online hemodiafiltration

Replacing the renal excretion of low molecular weight proteins (LMWP) by extracorporeal dialysis (dialysis) treatment poses technological challenges. Hemodialyzers with sieving coefficients for LMWP that match or even exceed those of the glomerular membrane barrier are commercially available; however, the associated losses of albumin are much higher than physiological levels of renal albumin excretion. A unidimensional, convection-diffusion model of solute transfer has been developed to analyze and quantitate LMWP extraction and albumin loss during dialysis treatment. The model is applicable to any extracorporeal dialysis technique and any type of hemodialyzer. Clinical extraction data for beta 2 microglobin (β2M, 11.6 kDa), myoglobin (16.7 kDa) and interleukin 6 (IL6, 21-30 kDa) from 15 patients on hemodiafiltration (HDF) using a Nipro Elisio H series high flux hemodialyzer were analyzed using the model and values for the convection and mass transfer coefficients were derived. The model predicts that under normal clinical operating conditions, given equal amounts of β2M removal, albumin losses are higher using pre-dilution rather than post-dilution HDF. The model can be used to provide estimates of the internal filtration rates of hemodialyzers operating in vivo.

Intravascular albumin loss is strongly associated with plasma volume withdrawal in dialysis patients

INTRODUCTION

Low circulating albumin closely predicts mortality in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients. The cause(s) of hypoalbuminemia (hALB) in ESRD patients remains to be elucidated. The aim of the present study was to determine the role of plasma volume (PV) withdrawal in the reduction of total circulating albumin and essential blood solutes induced by hemodialysis (HD).

METHODS

PV determined with high-precision automated carbon monoxide-rebreathing, total circulating as well as concentration of plasma albumin and electrolytes were assessed prior to and after 4-hour HD in 10 ESRD patients.

FINDINGS

Baseline PV ranged from 3.5 to 6.2 l. After HD, PV was decreased by 689 ± 566 mL (-16%) (P = 0.004). Total circulating albumin was largely reduced after HD (170.8 ± 35.1 vs. 146.1 ± 48.9 g, P = 0.008), while albumin concentration was unaltered. According to a strong linear relationship (r = 0.91, P < 0.001), one-third of total circulating albumin is lost from the intravascular compartment for every liter of PV removed. Similar results were found regarding Na⁺ and Ca²⁺ electrolytes.

DISCUSSION

Total circulating albumin, but not albumin concentration, is substantially reduced by HD in proportion to the amount of PV removed from the circulation. This study highlights the potential contributing role of PV withdrawal to hALB in ESRD patients.

High-volume online haemodiafiltration treatment and outcome of end-stage renal disease patients: more than one mode

The reduction of the dismally high mortality of current end-stage renal disease patients maintained on conventional standard haemodialysis (HD) remains an unmet medical need. Online haemodiafiltration (HDF) modes with various sites of fluid substitution (post-, pre-, mixed- and mid-dilution) are increasingly used worldwide as promising alternatives to conventional HD. Large scale cohort studies, post hoc analyses of randomized trials, and individual participant meta-analyses suggest that post-dilution and pre-dilution, especially with high substitution volumes, improve outcomes compared with conventional standard HD. However, there is no definitive proof of a survival advantage of HDF over standard HD. The different modes of high-volume HDF should be considered a therapeutic platform allowing to personalize and tailor routine HDF treatment. The selection of the HDF mode should be made according to individual patient characteristics. Utilizing high retention onset membranes, expanded haemodialysis (HDx) can achieve the same solute removal performance as HDF. Subgroups of high-volume OL-HDF patients could benefit from HDx. Ongoing and future trials should provide definitive proof for the superiority of high-volume OL-HDF over conventional HD or HDx to give guidance for the most favourable mode of dialytic therapy for clinical use.