2
|
Maïer B, Gory B, Lapergue B, Sibon I, Richard S, Kyheng M, Labreuche J, Desilles JP, Blanc R, Piotin M, Mazighi M, Halimi JM. Effect of Baseline Antihypertensive Treatments on Stroke Severity and Outcomes in the BP TARGET Trial. Stroke 2022; 53:1837-1846. [PMID: 35321558 DOI: 10.1161/strokeaha.121.037548] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients with a history of hypertension experience worse outcomes, which may be explained by a deleterious impact of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) overactivation. We sought to investigate whether prestroke antihypertensive treatments (AHT) influenced baseline stroke severity and neurological outcomes, in patients with AIS successfully treated by endovascular therapy. METHODS We performed a post hoc analysis of the BP TARGET trial (Blood Pressure Target in Acute Stroke to Reduce Hemorrhage After Endovascular Therapy) and included hypertensive patients with available data regarding AHT at admission, categorized as RAS inhibitors (ACE [angiotensin-converting enzyme] inhibitors, ARBs [angiotensin 2 receptor blockers], and β-blockers) and non-RAS inhibitors (calcium channel blockers and diuretics). Associations of each AHT with National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score at baseline were investigated in linear mixed model adjusted for the number of treatments and center. Associations of each AHT with 24-hour NIHSS change, intracranial hemorrhage were performed using linear mixed model adjusted for baseline NIHSS, the number of treatments, center, age, and sex and adjusted for age, sex, diabetes, and current smoking for favorable outcome. All analyses were performed on cases-available data regarding the low number of missing data. RESULTS Overall, 203 patients with at least one AHT were included. Patients under non-RAS inhibitor treatments had a higher NIHSS score at baseline (adjusted mean difference=3.28 [95% CI, 1.33-5.22]; P=0.001). Conversely, patients under RAS inhibitor treatments had a lower baseline NIHSS score (adjusted mean difference=-2.81 [95% CI, -5.37 to -0.25]; P=0.031). Intracranial hemorrhage occurrence was significantly more frequent in patients under non-RAS inhibitor treatments (adjusted odds ratio of 2.48 [95% CI, 1.12-5.47]; P=0.025). Conversely, the use of RAS inhibitor treatments before AIS was not associated with higher odds of radiographic intracranial hemorrhage. Patients with non-RAS inhibitor treatments had less improvement of NIHSS at 24 hours compared with patients without (adjusted mean difference, 2.83 [95% CI, -0.16 to 5.81]; P=0.063). Baseline RAS inhibitor or noninhibitor treatments were not associated with favorable outcome. CONCLUSIONS We showed an opposite effect of baseline AHT, based on their effect on the RAS. Patients treated with RAS inhibitor agents before AIS exhibited less severe AIS compared with patients under non-RAS inhibitor treatments, developed less intracranial hemorrhage at 24 hours and had a trend toward better NIHSS score at 24 hours. REGISTRATION URL: https://www. CLINICALTRIALS gov; Unique identifier: NCT03160677.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin Maïer
- Interventional Neuroradiology Department, Hôpital Fondation Ophtalmologique Adolphe de Rothschild, Paris, France (B.M., J.-P.D., R.B., M.P., M.M.).,Université de Paris, France (B.M., J.-P.D., M.M.).,FHU NeuroVasc, Paris, France (B.M., J.-P.D., R.B., M.P., M.M.).,EA4245-Transplantation, Immunology and Inflammation, University of Tours, France (B.M., J.-M.H.)
| | - Benjamin Gory
- Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Neuroradiology (B.G.), Université de Lorraine, France.,CHRU-Nancy and IADI, INSERM U1254 (B.G.), Université de Lorraine, France
| | - Bertrand Lapergue
- Division of Neurology, Department of Neurology, Stroke Centre, Foch Hospital, University Versailles Saint-Quentin en Yvelines, Suresnes, France (B.L.)
| | - Igor Sibon
- Stroke Unit, CHU Bordeaux, Université de Bordeaux, France (I.S.)
| | | | - Maeva Kyheng
- CHU Lille, EA 2694 - Santé publique: épidémiologie et qualité des soins, University of Lille, France (M.L., J.L.)
| | - Julien Labreuche
- CHU Lille, EA 2694 - Santé publique: épidémiologie et qualité des soins, University of Lille, France (M.L., J.L.)
| | - Jean-Philippe Desilles
- Interventional Neuroradiology Department, Hôpital Fondation Ophtalmologique Adolphe de Rothschild, Paris, France (B.M., J.-P.D., R.B., M.P., M.M.).,Université de Paris, France (B.M., J.-P.D., M.M.).,FHU NeuroVasc, Paris, France (B.M., J.-P.D., R.B., M.P., M.M.).,Laboratory of Vascular Translational Science, INSERM U1148, Paris, France (J.-P.D., R.B., M.P., M.M.)
| | - Raphael Blanc
- Interventional Neuroradiology Department, Hôpital Fondation Ophtalmologique Adolphe de Rothschild, Paris, France (B.M., J.-P.D., R.B., M.P., M.M.).,FHU NeuroVasc, Paris, France (B.M., J.-P.D., R.B., M.P., M.M.).,Laboratory of Vascular Translational Science, INSERM U1148, Paris, France (J.-P.D., R.B., M.P., M.M.)
| | - Michel Piotin
- Interventional Neuroradiology Department, Hôpital Fondation Ophtalmologique Adolphe de Rothschild, Paris, France (B.M., J.-P.D., R.B., M.P., M.M.).,FHU NeuroVasc, Paris, France (B.M., J.-P.D., R.B., M.P., M.M.).,Laboratory of Vascular Translational Science, INSERM U1148, Paris, France (J.-P.D., R.B., M.P., M.M.)
| | - Mikael Mazighi
- Interventional Neuroradiology Department, Hôpital Fondation Ophtalmologique Adolphe de Rothschild, Paris, France (B.M., J.-P.D., R.B., M.P., M.M.).,Université de Paris, France (B.M., J.-P.D., M.M.).,FHU NeuroVasc, Paris, France (B.M., J.-P.D., R.B., M.P., M.M.).,Laboratory of Vascular Translational Science, INSERM U1148, Paris, France (J.-P.D., R.B., M.P., M.M.)
| | - Jean-Michel Halimi
- EA4245-Transplantation, Immunology and Inflammation, University of Tours, France (B.M., J.-M.H.).,Nephrology Department, Tours Hospital, France (J.-M.H.). Université de Tours, France (J.M.H.)
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Cui P, McCullough LD, Hao J. Brain to periphery in acute ischemic stroke: Mechanisms and clinical significance. Front Neuroendocrinol 2021; 63:100932. [PMID: 34273406 PMCID: PMC9850260 DOI: 10.1016/j.yfrne.2021.100932] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2021] [Revised: 06/27/2021] [Accepted: 07/12/2021] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
The social and public health burdens of ischemic stroke have been increasing worldwide. In addition to focal brain damage, acute ischemic stroke (AIS) provokes systemic abnormalities across peripheral organs. AIS profoundly alters the autonomic nervous system, hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, and immune system, which further yield deleterious organ-specific consequences. Poststroke systemic pathological alterations in turn considerably contribute to the progression of ischemic brain injury, which accounts for the substantial impact of systemic complications on stroke outcomes. This review provides a comprehensive and updated pathophysiological model elucidating the systemic effects of AIS. To address their clinical significance and inform stroke management, we also outline the resulting systemic complications at particular stages of AIS and highlight the mechanisms. Future therapeutic strategies should attempt to integrate the treatment of primary brain lesions with interventions for secondary systemic complications, and should be tailored to patient individualized characteristics to optimize stroke outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pan Cui
- Department of Neurology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100053, China
| | - Louise D McCullough
- Department of Neurology, University of Texas Health Science Centre, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Junwei Hao
- Department of Neurology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100053, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Balla HZ, Cao Y, Ström JO. Effect of Beta-Blockers on Stroke Outcome: A Meta-Analysis. Clin Epidemiol 2021; 13:225-236. [PMID: 33762851 PMCID: PMC7982440 DOI: 10.2147/clep.s268105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2020] [Accepted: 02/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Cardiovascular events and infections are common in the acute phase after stroke. It has been suggested that these complications may be associated with excessive sympathetic activation due to the stroke, and that beta-adrenergic antagonists (beta-blockers) therefore may be beneficial. Aim The aim of the current meta-analysis was to investigate the association between beta-blocker treatment in acute stroke and the three outcomes: mortality, functional outcome and post-stroke infections. Methods A literature search was performed using the keywords stroke, cerebrovascular disorders, adrenergic beta-antagonists, treatment outcome and mortality. Randomized clinical trials and observational studies were eligible for data extraction. Heterogeneity was investigated using I2 statistics. Random effect model was used when heterogeneity presented among studies; otherwise, a fixed-effect model was used. Publication bias was assessed using Egger’s test and by visually inspecting funnel plots. Results A total of 20 studies were eligible for at least one of the three outcomes. Two of the included studies were randomized controlled trials and 18 were observational studies. Quality assessments indicated that the risk of bias was moderate. The meta-analysis found no significant association between treatment with beta-blockers and any of the three outcomes. The studies analyzed for the outcomes mortality and infection were heterogeneous, while studies analyzed for functional outcome were homogeneous. The articles analyzed for mortality showed signs of publication bias. Conclusion The lack of significant effects in the current meta-analysis, comprising more than 100,000 patients, does not support the proposed beneficial effects of beta-blockers in the acute phase of stroke.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hajnal Zsuzsanna Balla
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| | - Yang Cao
- Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Medical Sciences, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.,Unit of Biostatistics, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Jakob O Ström
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.,Department of Clinical Chemistry and Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Udwadia FR, McDonald PJ, Connolly MB, Hrincu V, Illes J. Youth Weigh In: Views on Advanced Neurotechnology for Drug-Resistant Epilepsy. J Child Neurol 2021; 36:128-132. [PMID: 32942941 PMCID: PMC7775323 DOI: 10.1177/0883073820957810] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Epilepsy affects over 500,000 children in North America of whom 30% have drug-resistant epilepsy. Advancements with neurotechnologies show promising benefits, but the perceptions of these procedures by youth is unknown. METHODS We conducted semistructured interviews with 10 youth in British Columbia, Canada who underwent procedures for drug-resistant epilepsy involving different forms of neurotechnology (subdural grids, vagus nerve stimulation, responsive neurostimulation). Interviews were analyzed using the constant comparative qualitative method. RESULTS Four major thematic categories emerged from the interviews. Treatment values, impact of the disorder, personal context, and impact of neurotechnology. CONCLUSIONS Besides the predictable goal of seizure reduction, a desire for autonomy and the importance of trust in the medical team emerged as dominant values within the 4 thematic categories that were explicit to the use of new neurotechnologies for the management of drug-resistant epilepsy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Farhad R Udwadia
- Neuroethics Canada, Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, 8166University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Faculty of Medicine, 8166University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Patrick J McDonald
- Neuroethics Canada, Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, 8166University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, 8166University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Mary B Connolly
- Division of Pediatric Neurology, Department of Pediatrics, 8166University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Viorica Hrincu
- Neuroethics Canada, Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, 8166University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Judy Illes
- Neuroethics Canada, Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, 8166University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Beta-Blockade in Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Neurocrit Care 2020; 33:508-515. [PMID: 31993953 DOI: 10.1007/s12028-020-00915-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE Sympathetic nervous system activation after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) is associated with complications and poor outcome. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we investigate the effect of beta-blockers on outcome after aSAH. METHODS The review was prospectively registered with PROSPERO (CRD42019111784). We performed a systematic literature search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, published conference proceedings, and abstracts. Eligible studies included both randomized controlled trials and observational studies up to October 2018, reporting the effect of beta-blocker therapy on the following outcomes in aSAH: mortality, vasospasm, delayed cerebral ischemia, infarction or stroke, cardiac dysfunction, and functional outcomes. Studies involving traumatic SAH were excluded. Citations were reviewed, and data extracted independently by two investigators using a standardized proforma. RESULTS We identified 819 records with 16 studies (four were randomized controlled trials) including 6702 patients selected for analysis. Exposure to beta-blockade either before or after aSAH was associated with a significant reduction in unadjusted mortality (RR 0.63, 95% CI 0.42-0.93, p = 0.02). A significant reduction in unadjusted mortality was also seen in prospective trials of post-event beta-blockade (RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.28-0.93, p = 0.03). Statistically significant differences were not seen for other outcomes investigated. CONCLUSIONS In adult patients with aSAH, beta-blocker therapy is associated with a mortality benefit. Studies are generally of a low quality with considerable clinical heterogeneity. Prospective large interventional trials with patient centered outcomes are required to validate this finding.
Collapse
|
7
|
Gabet A, Grimaud O, de Peretti C, Béjot Y, Olié V. Determinants of Case Fatality After Hospitalization for Stroke in France 2010 to 2015. Stroke 2019; 50:305-312. [PMID: 30621528 DOI: 10.1161/strokeaha.118.023495] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Background and Purpose- The aims of this study were to (1) describe early and late case fatality rates after stroke in France, (2) evaluate whether their determinants differed, and (3) analyze time trends between 2010 and 2015. Methods- Data were extracted from the Système National des données de santé database. Patients hospitalized for stroke each year from 2010 to 2015, aged ≥18 years, and affiliated to the general insurance scheme were selected. Cox regressions were used to separately analyze determinants of 30-day and 31- to 365-day case fatality rates for each stroke type (ischemic, intracerebral hemorrhage, and subarachnoid hemorrhage). Results- In 2015, of the 73 124 persons hospitalized for stroke, 26.8% died in the following year, with the majority of deaths occurring within the first 30 days (56.9%). Nonadmission to a stroke unit, older age, and having comorbidities were all associated with a poorer 30-day and 31- to 365-day prognosis. Female sex was associated with a lower 31- to 365-day case fatality rate for all patients with stroke. Living in an area with a high deprivation index was associated with both higher 30-day and 31- to 365-day case fatality rates for all stroke types. Between 2010 and 2015, significant decreases in both 30-day and 31- to 365-day case fatality rates for ischemic patients were observed. Conclusions- Case fatality rates after stroke remained high in 2015 in France, despite major improvements in stroke care and organization. Improvement in stroke awareness and preparedness, particularly in the most deprived areas, together with better follow-up after the acute phase are urgently needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amélie Gabet
- From Santé publique France, the French Public Health Agency, Saint-Maurice, France (A.G., V.O.)
| | - Olivier Grimaud
- French School of Public Health (EHESP), Rennes, France (O.G.)
| | - Christine de Peretti
- Directorate for Research, Studies, Assessment and Statistics, Ministry of Social Affairs and Health, Paris, France (C.d.P.)
| | - Yannick Béjot
- Dijon Stroke Registry, EA 7460 Pathophysiology and Epidemiology of Cerebro-Cardiovascular Diseases (PEC2), University Hospital and Medical School of Dijon, University of Burgundy, France (Y.B.)
| | - Valérie Olié
- From Santé publique France, the French Public Health Agency, Saint-Maurice, France (A.G., V.O.)
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Sykora M, Putaala J, Meretoja A, Tatlisumak T, Strbian D. Beta-blocker therapy is not associated with mortality after intracerebral hemorrhage. Acta Neurol Scand 2018; 137:105-108. [PMID: 28869294 DOI: 10.1111/ane.12817] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/10/2017] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Beta-blocker therapy has been suggested to have neuroprotective properties in the setting of acute stroke; however, the evidence is weak and contradictory. We aimed to examine the effects of pre-admission therapy with beta-blockers (BB) on the mortality following spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). METHODS Retrospective analysis of the Helsinki ICH Study database. RESULTS A total of 1013 patients with ICH were included in the analysis. Patients taking BB were significantly older, had a higher premorbid mRS score, had more DNR orders, and more comorbidities as atrial fibrillation, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, ischemic heart disease, and heart failure. After adjustment for age, pre-existing comorbidities, and prior use of antithrombotic and antihypertensive medications, no differences in in-hospital mortality (OR 1.1, 95% CI 0.8-1.7), 12-month mortality (OR 1.3, 95% CI 0.9-1.9), and 3-month mortality (OR 1.2, 95% CI 0.8-1.7) emerged. CONCLUSION Pre-admission use of BB was not associated with mortality after ICH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M. Sykora
- Department of Neurology; St. John's Hospital; Medical faculty; Sigmund Freud University Vienna; Wien Austria
| | - J. Putaala
- Department of Neurology; Helsinki University Hospital; Helsinki Finland
| | - A. Meretoja
- Department of Neurology; Helsinki University Hospital; Helsinki Finland
- Department of Medicine at the Royal Melbourne Hospital; University of Melbourne; Parkville VIC Australia
| | - T. Tatlisumak
- Department of Neurology; Helsinki University Hospital; Helsinki Finland
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences/Neurology; Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology; Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg and Sahlgrenska University Hospital; Gothenburg Sweden
| | - D. Strbian
- Department of Neurology; Helsinki University Hospital; Helsinki Finland
| |
Collapse
|