The MRZ reaction helps to distinguish rheumatologic disorders with central nervous involvement from multiple sclerosis

A comparison of measles-rubella-zoster reaction, oligoclonal IgG bands, oligoclonal kappa free light chains and kappa index in multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the diagnostic performance of the measles-rubella-zoster reaction (MRZR) in a large real-world multiple sclerosis (MS) cohort. Second, to compare MRZR with the determination of oligoclonal IgG bands (OCB), oligoclonal kappa free light chain bands (oKFLC), and the KFLC index.

METHODS

A single-center retrospective study was conducted at the University Hospital Ostrava (Czech Republic). Patients were eligible if aged ≥18 years with a determined clinical diagnosis. IgG antibodies against measles (M), rubella (R), and varicella zoster (Z) viruses were determined in paired CSF and serum using ELISA and MRZR indicated as positive if at least two components had an antibody index >1.4. OCB and oKFLC were detected by means of isoelectric focusing, and KFLC CSF and serum concentrations for calculation of the KFLC index were determined immunochemically.

RESULTS

A total of 1,751 patients were included in the analyzed data set, which comprised 379 MS patients and 1,372 non-MS controls. The frequency of positive MRZR was higher in MS than in non-MS cases (MS 32.2 % vs non-MS 2.8 %; p < 0.001). This corresponded to a specificity of 97.2 % (95 % CI 96.1-98.0) and sensitivity of 32.2 % (95 % CI 27.5-37.2) and overall accuracy of 83.1 % (95 % CI 81.3-84.8). In comparison, the highest sensitivity of 95.6% (95 % CI 93.0-97.5) was for OCB with specificity of 86.9 % (95 % CI 84.9-88.7), followed by oKFLC with sensitivity and specificity of 94.7 % (95 % CI 91.5-96.9) and 78.4% (95 % CI 75.7-80.8), respectively, and the KFLC index with sensitivity of 92.5 % (95 % CI 86.6-96.3) and specificity of 93.5 % (95 % CI 90.5-95.9).

DISCUSSION

MRZR remains a very specific test for the diagnosis of MS but has low sensitivity, which disallows its independent use. In contrast, OCB showed the highest sensitivity and thus remains the gold standard for the diagnosis of MS.

Cerebral lesions sites in neurosarcoidosis: a lesion mapping study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Sarcoidosis is a granulomatous disease of unknown etiology affecting the central nervous system in up to 15% of the patients. Diagnosis of neurosarcoidosis is very challenging due to the heterogeneity of its clinical manifestation. This study intended to evaluate the distribution of cerebral lesion sites and the potential presence of specific lesion clusters in neurosarcoidosis patients using voxel-based lesion symptom mapping (VLSM).

METHODS

Patients with neurosarcoidosis were retrospectively identified and included between 2011 and 2022. Cerebral lesion sites were correlated voxel-wise with presence and absence of neurosarcoidosis using non-parametric permutation test. Multiple sclerosis patients served as controls for the VLSM-analysis.

RESULTS

Thirty-four patients (mean age 52 ± 15 years) of whom 13 were diagnosed with possible, 19 with probable and 2 with confirmed neurosarcoidosis were identified. Lesion overlap of neurosarcoidosis patients demonstrated a distribution of white matter lesions in all brain areas, with a periventricular predilection similar to multiple sclerosis. In contrast to multiple sclerosis controls, no propensity for lesions in proximity of the corpus callosum was observed. Neurosarcoidosis lesions appeared smaller and lesion volume was lower in the neurosarcoidosis cohort. The VLSM analysis showed minor associations between neurosarcoidosis and damaged voxels in the bilateral frontobasal cortex.

CONCLUSIONS

The VLSM analysis yielded significant associations in the bilateral frontal cortex, suggesting that leptomeningeal inflammatory disease with following cortical involvement is a quite specific feature in neurosarcoidosis. Lesion load was lower in neurosarcoidosis than in multiple sclerosis. However, no specific pattern of subcortical white matter lesions in neurosarcoidosis was revealed.

Clinical associations and characteristics of the polyspecific intrathecal immune response in elderly patients with non-multiple sclerosis chronic autoimmune-inflammatory neurological diseases - a retrospective cross-sectional study

Introduction

The polyspecific intrathecal immune response (PSIIR), aka MRZ reaction (M = measles, R = rubella, Z = zoster, optionally Herpes simplex virus, HSV) is defined as intrathecal immunoglobulin synthesis (IIS) for two or more unrelated viruses. Although an established cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarker for multiple sclerosis (MS), a chronic autoimmune-inflammatory neurological disease (CAIND) of the central nervous system (CNS) usually starting in young adulthood, the full spectrum of CAINDs with a positive PSIIR remains ill defined.

Methods

In this retrospective, cross-sectional study, patients with CSF-positive oligoclonal bands (OCB) and - to enrich for non-MS diagnoses - aged ≥50 years were enrolled.

Results

Of 415 with PSIIR testing results (MRZ, HSV optional), 76 were PSIIR-positive. Of these, 25 (33%) did not meet the diagnostic criteria for MS spectrum diseases (MS-S) comprising clinically or radiologically isolated syndrome (CIS/RIS) or MS. PSIIR-positive non-MS-S phenotypes were heterogenous with CNS, peripheral nerve and motor neuron involvement and often defied unequivocal diagnostic classification. A rating by neuroimmunology experts suggested non-MS CAINDs in 16/25 (64%). Long-term follow-up available in 13 always showed a chronically progressive course. Four of five responded to immunotherapy. Compared to MS-S patients, non-MS CAIND patients showed less frequent CNS regions with demyelination (25% vs. 75%) and quantitative IgG IIS (31% vs. 81%). MRZ-specific IIS did not differ between both groups, while additional HSV-specific IIS was characteristic for non-MS CAIND patients.

Discussion

In conclusion, PSIIR positivity occurs frequently in non-MS-S patients ≥50 years. Although sometimes apparently coincidental, the PSIIR seems to represent a suitable biomarker for previously unnoticed chronic neurologic autoimmunities, which require further characterization.

Novel anti-cytoplasmic antibodies in cerebrospinal fluid and serum of patients with chronic severe mental disorders

OBJECTIVES

There is an emerging role of autoimmune causes related to severe mental disorders (SMD). The clinical approach in patients with chronic SMD and novel anti-central nervous system antibodies is complex.

METHODS

Two corresponding cumulative cases are presented. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and serum were investigated using tissue-based assays.

RESULTS

Both patients suffered from chronic SMD and were negative for well-characterized neuronal antibodies. Patient 1 suffered from a dysexecutive and neurocognitive syndrome with mild abnormalities in automated electroencephalography analysis, elevated CSF protein levels, several serum autoantibodies (including antibodies against endothelial cells), and novel antibodies with a "dotted/scalloped" binding against cytoplasmic structures in CSF. Patient 2 with obsessive-compulsive disorder had left temporal abnormalities on automated magnetic resonance imaging analysis, an elevated CSF/serum albumin quotient, and novel atypical cytoplasmic "spotted" antibody staining in the serum. Patient 1 improved with immunotherapy using high-dose steroids, but patient 2 did not improve under the same treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The detection of autoantibodies in CSF of chronic SMD may be beneficial in selecting some patients for immunotherapy. The possible impact of novel anti-cytoplasmic antibodies in this context is critically discussed. Further research is needed to establish the underlying pathophysiological processes as well as their diagnostic and therapeutic implications.

Cerebrospinal fluid findings in adult patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder: A retrospective analysis of 54 samples

OBJECTIVES

Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) can rarely be associated with immunological aetiologies, most notably in Paediatric Autoimmune Neuropsychiatric Disorder Associated with Streptococcal Infections and possibly in autoimmune encephalitis. As cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis is a sensitive method for assessing neuroinflammation, this retrospective study analysed basic CSF parameters and well-characterised as well as novel neuronal autoantibodies in OCD to screen for signs of autoimmunity.

METHODS

Basic CSF findings of 54 adult OCD patients suspected of an organic aetiology were retrospectively compared to a control group of mentally healthy patients (N = 39) with idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Further subgroup analysis included testing for well-characterised neuronal IgG autoantibodies and tissue-based assays using indirect immunofluorescence to screen for novel brain autoantibodies.

RESULTS

Elevated protein in the CSF of OCD patients compared to the control group (p = 0.043) was identified. Inflammatory markers (pleocytosis/oligoclonal bands/increased IgG-index) were detected in 7% of all patients with OCD. Well-characterised neuronal autoantibodies were not found in any OCD patient, whereas 6/18 (33%) CSF samples showed binding on mouse brain sections in tissue-based assays (binding to neuropil in the basal ganglia/brainstem, cilia of granule cells, blood vessels, nuclear/perinuclear structures).

CONCLUSIONS

While elevated CSF protein is merely a weak indicator of blood CSF barrier dysfunction, the presence of inflammatory CSF changes and novel brain autoantibodies in CSF may indicate OCD subtypes with inflammatory pathomechanism and supports the hypothesis of a rare "autoimmune OCD" subtype.

Sex and age as determinants of the seroprevalence of anti-measles IgG among European healthcare workers: A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

The international literature shows good evidence of a significant rate of measles susceptibility among healthcare workers (HCWs). As such, they are an important public health issue.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate the prevalence of susceptible HCWs in EU/EEA countries and in the UK and to explore the characteristics (sex and age differences) and management of those found to be susceptible.

RESULTS

Nineteen studies were included in the meta-analysis. The prevalence of measles-susceptible HCWs was 13.3% (95 %CI: 10.0-17.0%). In a comparison of serosusceptible female vs. male HCWs, the RR was 0.92 (95 %CI = 0.83-1.03), and in a comparison of age classes (born after vs. before 1980) the RR was 2.78 (95 %CI = 2.20-3.50). The most recent studies proposed the mandatory vaccination of HCWs.

DISCUSSION

According to our meta-analysis, the prevalence of serosusceptible European HCWs is 13%; HCWs born in the post-vaccination era seem to be at higher risk. Healthcare professionals susceptible to measles are a serious epidemiological concern. Greater efforts should therefore be made to identify those who have yet to be vaccinated and actively encourage their vaccination.

Laboratory biomarkers of Multiple Sclerosis (MS)

Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is a neurological disease that affects the central nervous system (CNS). The diagnosis of the disease is quite challenging due to its variation among patients. As a result, the need to enhance diagnostic procedures, evaluate objective prognostic markers and promote effective monitoring of patients' responses to treatment has prompted the identification of many biomarkers. To present up-to-date knowledge on potential biomarkers for MS used to assess disease activity, progression, and therapeutic responses. The search for articles was conducted in various databases, namely, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and CINAHL, using an identical search strategy and terms that included "Multiple Sclerosis," "MS," "biomarkers," "potential," "magnetic resonance spectroscopy," "progress," "marker," "predict," "disability," "indicator," and "mass spectrometry." Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines were followed when scrutinizing the articles for inclusion in the study. The search process identified 75 articles that were used in this systematic review. MS biomarkers consisted of laboratory biomarkers, imaging biomarkers, and genetic and immunogenetic biomarkers. The efficacy, which leads to their potential classification, relies on numerous factors, such as sensitivity, specificity, clinical rationale, predictability, practicality, biological rationale, reproducibility, and correlations with prognosis and disability. Oligoclonal bands (OCBs) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features are the most established biomarkers so far, although kappa free light chains (kFLCs), the measles-rubella-zoster (MRZ) reaction, and neurofilament light chains (NfLs) might show potential in the near future after more studies are conducted.

Follow-up after infectious mononucleosis in search of serological similarities with presymptomatic multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND

A two- to three-fold increase in the risk of multiple sclerosis (MS) after infectious mononucleosis (IM) has been observed in cohort and case control studies. However, this association has not been investigated prospectively from IM. It remains to be determined whether long-term immunospecific sequelae with features consistent with presymptomatic MS occur after IM.

METHODS

Sera were obtained from individuals with acute IM from 2003-2007 (n = 42) and from the same individuals at a follow-up (FU) study approximately 10 years after IM. These were assayed for antibodies against a variety of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) antigens, including gp350, a novel recombinant glycoprotein from the EBV envelope. Similarly, single-protein antigens were used to assess measles and varicella-zoster reactivity (Ncore and varicella-zoster glycoprotein E [VZVgE]). The FU study also included cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples from 21 of these individuals to test for IgG antibodies against the same viral antigens. As controls, CSF and serum samples were obtained from 15 EBV-seropositive volunteers who denied a history of IM, and serum samples were obtained from 24 EBV-seropositive blood donors. Anti-gp350, anti-Ncore and anti-VZVgE IgG levels were also analysed in sera and CSF samples from 22 persons with MS.

RESULTS

The FU assays showed higher anti-gp350 IgG (p = 0.007, univariate) than among healthy controls, with no difference in serum anti-VCA or anti-EBNA1 IgG levels and no difference in anti-gp350 in the CSF samples. Anti-Ncore IgG and anti-VZVgE were higher in acute IM samples (p < 0.001 and p < 0.0001, respectively) than at FU, although anti-Ncore remained heightened in an age-adjusted analysis at FU (p = 0.014) compared to the control group. In the MS group, the serum anti-gp350 and anti-Ncore IgG levels were significantly higher than among the control group, but the anti-VZVgE levels were not. The CSF anti-gp350 and VZVgE levels were slightly higher among persons with MS than among the control group, whereas anti-Ncore IgG was markedly higher in persons with MS than in the control group.

CONCLUSION

In the present study IM showed certain similarities with MS. Increased anti-gp350 reactivity persisted more than a decade after IM, reminiscent of the established increased anti-EBV reactivity in presymptomatic MS. Acute IM was associated with increased anti-measles and anti-VZV immunoreactivity, similar to the MRZ reaction in MS, with some evidence suggesting that this measles reactivity persisted after a decade.

Biomarkers of Multiple Sclerosis

The search for an ideal multiple sclerosis biomarker with good diagnostic value, prognostic reference and an impact on clinical outcome has yet to be realized and is still ongoing. The aim of this review is to establish an overview of the frequent biomarkers for multiple sclerosis that exist to date. The review summarizes the results obtained from electronic databases, as well as thorough manual searches. In this review the sources and methods of biomarkers extraction are described; in addition to the description of each biomarker, determination of the prognostic, diagnostic, disease monitoring and treatment response values besides clinical impact they might possess. We divided the biomarkers into three categories according to the achievement method: laboratory markers, genetic-immunogenetic markers and imaging markers. We have found two biomarkers at the time being considered the gold standard for MS diagnostics. Unfortunately, there does not exist a single solitary marker being able to present reliable diagnostic value, prognostic value, high sensitivity and specificity as well as clinical impact. We need more studies to find the best biomarker for MS.

[Neuroimmunology and rheumatology: overlap and differential diagnoses]

Multiple sclerosis (MS) and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) are chronic inflammatory diseases of the central nervous system (CNS). They may cause inflammation in the brain, spinal cord and optic nerve. Both conditions must be differentiated from CNS manifestations of other systemic autoimmune diseases such as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), Sjögren's syndrome, autoinflammtory diseases and sarcoidosis, since amongst others myelitis and optic nerve inflammation may also occur in these conditions. Nevertheless, coexistence of MS or NMOSD with rheumatic disorders such as SLE or Sjögren's syndrome has also been reported especially in NMOSD. Since the therapeutic approach is different it is important to determine a clear diagnosis. In addition some drugs used in rheumatic disease such as anti-tumor necrosis factor biologics may induce inflammatory disease of the CNS and should be avoided in MS. An interdisciplinary approach between neuroimmunology and rheumatology is important for optimal care and treatment in such patients.

The MRZ-Reaction and Specific Autoantibody Detection for Differentiation of ANA-Positive Multiple Sclerosis From Rheumatic Diseases With Cerebral Involvement

Objective: Rheumatic diseases with involvement of the central nervous system (RDwCNS) may mimic multiple sclerosis (MS). Inversely, up to 60% of MS-patients have antinuclear autoantibodies (ANAs) and may be misdiagnosed as RDwCNS. The detection of antibodies against extractable nuclear antigens (ENA) and oligoclonal bands (OCB) are established valuable diagnostic tools in the differential diagnosis of RDwCNS and MS. The MRZ-reaction (MRZR) is defined by three antibody indices (AIs) against neurotropic viruses and is frequently positive in MS. To investigate the added value of MRZR combined with testing for antibodies against ENAs and OCB detection to distinguish RDwCNS from ANA positive MS.

Methods: MRZR was evaluated in RDwCNS (n = 40) and 68 ANA positive MS-patients. Two stringency levels, MRZR-1 and MRZR-2 (at least one respectively two of three AIs positive) were applied. Autoantibody testing included ANA plus ENA and anti-dsDNA antibodies, antiphospholipid antibodies, and anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies.

Results: Most of the RDwCNS patients (n = 32; 80%) suffered from systemic lupus erythematosus. Within the RDwCNS group 20% had a positive MRZR-1 and 8.5% a positive MRZR-2 compared to 80.9 and 60%, respectively within the MS-group (p < 0.0001 for both comparisons). Oligoclonal bands were found in 28.6% of the RDwCNS patients and 94.3% of the MS-patients (p < 0.0001). Conversely, autoantibodies to specific nuclear antigens or phospholipids were found more frequently in RDwCNS. A positive MRZR in conjunction with the absence of ENA autoantibodies distinguished MS from RDwCNS with high specificity (97.5%).

Conclusions: We suggest combining MRZR, OCBs, and specific autoantibody diagnostics to differentiate RDwCNS from MS.

Do elevated autoantibodies in patients with multiple sclerosis matter?

OBJECTIVES

The incidence and clinical impact of serum autoantibodies in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) are controversially discussed. The aim of the study was to reassess the value of elevated serum autoantibodies in our MS study cohort.

MATERIAL & METHODS

In total, 176 MS patients were retrospectively analyzed for coexistence and clinical impact of increased serum autoantibody levels.

RESULTS

The 18.8% of the MS cohort showed elevated serum autoantibody levels, but only 10.2% of all MS patients were diagnosed with a further autoimmune disease (AI). Patients with elevated serum autoantibodies (AABS) were not significantly more often diagnosed with a clinical manifest AI as compared to patients with negative autoantibodies (P = 0.338). MS patients with disease duration of more than 10 years showed no significant increase of positive autoantibodies as compared to patients with a more recent disease onset (P = 1). MS patients with elevated serum autoantibodies did not exhibit a significantly worse disease course (P = 0.428).

CONCLUSIONS

According to our data, elevated serum autoantibodies do not have the potential to serve as a prognostic tool for disease severity in patients with MS Since MS patients with positive serum AABS did not significantly more often suffer from clinical manifest AIs than MS patients with negative serum AABS, the role of routine testing of serum AABS in MS patients should be critically called into question.

[Neuroimmunology and rheumatology: overlap and differential diagnoses]

Multiple sclerosis (MS) and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) are chronic inflammatory diseases of the central nervous system (CNS). They may cause inflammation in the brain, spinal cord and optic nerve. Both conditions must be differentiated from CNS manifestations of other systemic autoimmune diseases such as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), Sjögren's syndrome, autoinflammtory diseases and sarcoidosis, since amongst others myelitis and optic nerve inflammation may also occur in these conditions. Nevertheless, coexistence of MS or NMOSD with rheumatic disorders such as SLE or Sjögren's syndrome has also been reported especially in NMOSD. Since the therapeutic approach is different it is important to determine a clear diagnosis. In addition some drugs used in rheumatic disease such as anti-tumor necrosis factor biologics may induce inflammatory disease of the CNS and should be avoided in MS. An interdisciplinary approach between neuroimmunology and rheumatology is important for optimal care and treatment in such patients.