Early strategy of scepter XC balloon angioplasty and simultaneous Nimodipine infusion for vasospasm following ruptured aneurysm

Treatment of Cerebral Vasospasm after Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Using the Compliant Manually Adjustable Mesh Comaneci

Background and purpose: Cerebral vasospasm (CV) following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) may lead to morbidity and mortality. Endovascular mechanical angioplasty may be performed if symptomatic CV is refractory to noninvasive medical management. Compliant and noncompliant balloons and manually adjustable mesh may be used in this indication. We describe our initial experience with the Comaneci (Rapid Medical, Yokneam, Israel) in cerebral vasospasm treatment following aSAH. Methods: All patients included in the prospective observational SAVEBRAIN PWI (NCT05276934 on clinicaltrial.gov) study who underwent cerebral angioplasty using the Comaneci device for the treatment of medically refractory and symptomatic CV after aSAH were identified. Patient demographic information, procedural details, and outcomes were obtained from electronic medical records. Results: Between February 2022 and June 2023, seven consecutive patients underwent CV treatment with the Comaneci. Angioplasty of 37 arterial segments (supraclinoid internal carotid artery, A1, A2, and A3 segments of the anterior cerebral artery and M1 and M2 segments of the middle cerebral artery) was attempted, and 35/37 (95%) were performed. The vessel diameter improved significantly following angioplasty (+64%), while brain hypoperfusion decreased (-45% of the mean T Max). There was no long-term clinical complication, and 6% per-procedural complications occurred. Conclusions: The Comaneci is effective in the treatment of cerebral vasospasm following aSAH, bringing a new device in the armamentarium of the neurointerventionalist to perform intracranial angioplasty.

Diagnosis and endovascular management of vasospasm after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage - survey of real-life practices

BACKGROUND

Vasospasm and delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) are the leading causes of morbidity and mortality after intracranial aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). Vasospasm detection, prevention and management, especially endovascular management varies from center to center and lacks standardization. We aimed to evaluate this variability via an international survey of how neurointerventionalists approach vasospasm diagnosis and endovascular management.

METHODS

We designed an anonymous online survey with 100 questions to evaluate practice patterns between December 2021 and September 2022. We contacted endovascular neurosurgeons, neuroradiologists and neurologists via email and via two professional societies - the Society of NeuroInterventional Surgery (SNIS) and the European Society of Minimally Invasive Neurological Therapy (ESMINT). We recorded the physicians' responses to the survey questions.

RESULTS

A total of 201 physicians (25% [50/201] USA and 75% non-USA) completed the survey over 10 months, 42% had >7 years of experience, 92% were male, median age was 40 (IQR 35-46). Both high-volume and low-volume centers were represented. Daily transcranial Doppler was the most common screening method (75%) for vasospasm. In cases of symptomatic vasospasm despite optimal medical management, endovascular treatment was directly considered by 58% of physicians. The most common reason to initiate endovascular treatment was clinical deficits associated with proven vasospasm/DCI in 89%. The choice of endovascular treatment and its efficacy was highly variable. Nimodipine was the most common first-line intra-arterial therapy (40%). Mechanical angioplasty was considered the most effective endovascular treatment by 65% of neurointerventionalists.

CONCLUSION

Our study highlights the considerable heterogeneity among the neurointerventional community regarding vasospasm diagnosis and endovascular management. Randomized trials and guidelines are needed to improve standard of care, determine optimal management approaches and track outcomes.

Treatment of Cerebral Vasospasm Following Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage using the Neurospeed Semi-compliant Balloon

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Cerebral vasospasm (CV) following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) may lead to morbidity and mortality. Endovascular mechanical angioplasty may be performed if symptomatic CV is refractory to noninvasive medical management. Off-label compliant remodelling balloons tend to conform to the course of the vessel, contrary to noncompliant or semi-compliant balloons. Our objective is to describe our initial experience with the semi-compliant Neurospeed balloon (approved for intracranial stenosis) in cerebral vasospasm treatment following aSAH.

METHODS

All patients included in the prospective observational SAVEBRAIN PWI (NCT05276934 on clinicaltrial.gov) study who underwent cerebral angioplasty using the Neurospeed balloon for the treatment of medically refractory and symptomatic CV after aSAH were identified. Patient demographic information, procedural details and outcomes were obtained from electronic medical records.

RESULTS

Between February 2022 and June 2023, 8 consecutive patients underwent CV treatment with the Neurospeed balloon. Angioplasty of 48 arterial segments (supraclinoid internal carotid artery, A1 and A2 segments of the anterior cerebral artery, M1 and M2 segments of the middle cerebral artery) was attempted and 44/48 (92%) were performed. The vessel diameter significantly improved following angioplasty (+81%), while brain hypoperfusion decreased (-81% of the mean TMax). There was no long-term clinical complication, 4% periprocedural complications occurred.

CONCLUSION

The semi-compliant Neurospeed balloon is effective in the treatment of cerebral vasospasm following aSAH, bringing a new device into the armamentarium of the neurointerventionalist to perform intracranial angioplasty.

Effect of Cilostazol on Delayed Cerebral Infarction in Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Using Explainable Predictive Modeling

The studies interpreting DCI, a complication of SAH, and identifying correlations are very limited. This study aimed to investigate the effect of cilostazol on ACV and DCI after coil embolization for ruptured aneurysms (n = 432). A multivariate analysis was performed and explainable artificial intelligence approaches were used to analyze the contribution of cilostazol as a risk factor on the development of ACV and DCI with respect to global and local interpretation. The cilonimo group was significantly lower than the nimo group in ACV (13.5% vs. 29.3; p = 0.003) and DCI (7.9% vs. 20.7%; p = 0.006), respectively. In a multivariate logistic regression, the odds ratio for DCI for the cilonimo group, female sex, and aneurysm size was 0.556 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.351-0.879; p = 0.012), 3.713 (95% CI, 1.683-8.191; p = 0.001), and 1.106 (95% CI, 1.008-1.214; p = 0.034). The risk of a DCI occurrence was significantly increased with an aneurysm size greater than 10 mm (max 80%). The mean AUC of the XGBoost and logistic regression models was 0.94 ± 0.03 and 0.95 ± 0.04, respectively. Cilostazol treatment combined with nimodipine could decrease the prevalence of ACV (13.5%) and DCI (7.9%) in patients with aSAH.

Vasospasm Management Strategies

Aim-

In this study, we present a broad presentation of the current state of cerebral vasospasm, including its pathogenesis, commonly used treatments, and future outlook.

Methods-

A literature review was conducted for cerebral vasospasms using the PubMed journal database (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov). Relevant journal articles were narrowed down and selected using the Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) option in PubMed.

Results-

Cerebral vasospasm is the persistent narrowing of cerebral arteries days after experiencing a subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). Eventually, if not corrected, this can lead to cerebral ischemia with significant neurological deficits and/or death. Therefore, it is clinically beneficial to diminish or prevent the occurrence or reoccurrence of vasospasm in patients following a SAH to prevent unwanted comorbidities or fatalities. We discuss the pathogenesis and mechanism of development that have been implicated in the progression of vasospasms as well as the manner in which clinical outcomes are quantitively measured. Further, we mention and highlight commonly used treatments to inhibit and reverse the course of vasoconstriction within the cerebral arteries. Additionally, we mention innovations and techniques that are being used to treat vasospasms and the outlook of their therapeutic value.

Conclusion-

Overall, we give a comprehensive summary of the disease that encapsulates cerebral vasospasm and the current and future standards of care that are used to treat it.

Rescue embolization with direct coil delivery from dual-lumen balloon microcatheter

BACKGROUND

Balloon microcatheters are widely used for endovascular treatment. However, no reports on direct coil embolization from dual-lumen balloon microcatheters are available in the literature. This report is the first description of direct coil embolization using this type of balloon microcatheter for looming bleeding emergencies.

METHODS

This retrospective review demonstrates the indications and advantages of coil embolization from an inflated balloon catheter to reduce blood loss and simultaneously occlude bleeding.

RESULTS

Five patients who underwent emergency endovascular treatment using coil embolization directly delivered from a dual-lumen balloon were identified. Etiologies included vertebro-vertebral arteriovenous fistula, ruptured vertebral artery dissecting aneurysm, vertebral artery injury during cervical spinal operation, and failed stent retrieval procedures for acute infarction. Complete hemostasis was achieved with all procedures.

CONCLUSION

Our experience demonstrates the feasibility of direct coil embolization by using a dual-lumen balloon to rapidly halt bleeding in some rare emergency situations, which may save lives.

Intracranial stenting as a bail-out option for posthemorrhagic cerebral vasospasm: a single-center experience with long-term follow-up

Background

Cerebral vasospasm (CVS) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in patients after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). Endovascular treatment, including intraarterial infusion of drugs with vasodilation effects, and balloon- and stentriever angioplasty, are helpful but may achieve only short-term effects. There is a clinical need for long-lasting treatment of refractory recurrent vasospasm. We report our experience in stent implantation as a treatment for recurrent severe post-SAH vasospasm.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of our institutional database of 883 patients with SAH, managed between January 2010 and December 2021, was performed. Six patients were identified as having received intracranial stenting in the context of post-SAH cerebral vasospasm. All patients were initially treated with intra-arterial infusion of nimodipine and/or milrinone. Self-expanding intracranial stents were implanted during endovascular aneurysm treatment to enable access despite impaired perfusion (Group 1) or as a bail-out strategy after failed intraarterial drug infusion or mechanical treatment (Group 2). All stented patients received dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for 6 months.

Results

Nine vessels in six patients with severe post-SAH vasospasm were stented. The stents were deployed in 16 vessel segments. All attempted implantations were technically successful. All patients demonstrated radiographic and clinical improvement of the vessel narrowing. No recurrent vasospasm or permanent vessel occlusion of the stented vessels was encountered. A thrombus formation in a Group 1 patient resolved under 4 mg eptifibatide IA infusion. During long-term angiographic follow-up, neither in-stent stenosis nor stent occlusion was found.

Conclusions

Endovascular implantation of self-expanding stents is a potential ultima ratio strategy for patients with severe refractory post-SAH cerebral vasospasm. Stents with reduced thrombogenicity (avoiding DAPT) and bioabsorbable self-expanding stents might further advance this concept.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12883-022-02862-4.

Vasospasm-Related Death after Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Retrospective Case-Control Study

BACKGROUND

Vasospasm after the rupture of an intracranial aneurysm is a frequent phenomenon and is the main cause of morbidity and mortality in patients who have survived intracranial hemorrhage and aneurysm treatment. We analyzed the diagnosis and management of patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage who eventually died from ischemic brain damage due to vasospasm.

METHODS

Between January 2007 and December 2021 (15 years), a total of 1064 patients were diagnosed with an aneurysmal intracranial hemorrhage in a single comprehensive neurovascular center. Vasospasm was diagnosed in 408 patients (38.4%). A total of 187 patients (17.6%) died within 90 days of the aneurysm rupture. In 64 of these 187 patients (33.7%), vasospasm was considered to be the cause of death. In a retrospective analysis, demographic and clinical data for patients without, with non-fatal, and with fatal vasospasm were compared. The patients with fatal vasospasm were categorized into the following subgroups: "no diagnosis and treatment" (Group a), "delayed diagnosis" (Group b), "cardiovascular complications" (Group c), and "vasospasm-treatment complications" (Group d).

RESULTS

Among the patients with fatal vasospasm, 31 (48.4%) were assigned to group a, 26 (40.6%) to group b, seven (10.9%) to group c, and none (0%) to group d.

CONCLUSION

The early recognition of severe posthemorrhagic vasospasm is a prerequisite for any treatment and requires routine diagnostic imaging in all unconscious patients. Aggressive endovascular vasospasm treatment may fail to prevent death but is infrequently the cause of a fatal outcome.

Radiation exposure in the intra-arterial nimodipine therapy of subarachnoid hemorrhage related cerebral vasospasm

The selective intra-arterial nimodipine application for the treatment of cerebral vasospasm (CVS) in patients after spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage (sSAH) is widely employed. The purpose of this study is to examine the radiation exposure and to determine local diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) of intra-arterial nimodipine therapy. In a retrospective study design, DRLs and achievable dose (AD) were assessed for all patients undergoing (I) selective intra-arterial nimodipine application or (II) additional mechanical angioplasty for CVS treatment. Interventional procedures were differentiated according to the type of procedure and the number of probed vessels. Altogether 494 neurointerventional procedures of 121 patients with CVS due to sSAH could be included. The radiation exposure indices were distributed as follows: (I) DRL 74.3 Gy·cm², AD 59.8 Gy·cm²; (II) DRL 128.3 Gy·cm², AD 94.5 Gy·cm². Kruskal-Wallis test confirmed significant dose difference considering the number of probed vessels (p< 0.001). The mean cumulative dose per patient was 254.9 Gy·cm²(interquartile range 88.6-315.6 Gy·cm²). The DRLs of intra-arterial nimodipine therapy are substantially lower compared with DRLs proposed for other therapeutic interventions, such as thrombectomy or aneurysm coiling. However, repeated therapy sessions are often required, bearing the potential risk of a cumulatively higher radiation exposure.

Intensive therapies of delayed cerebral ischemia after subarachnoid hemorrhage: a propensity-matched comparison of different center-driven strategies

BACKGROUND

Intensive therapies of delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) have still controversial and unproven benefit. We aimed to compare the overall efficacy of two different center-driven strategies for the treatment of DCI respectively with and without vasospasm angioplasty.

METHODS

Two hundred consecutive patients with aSAH were enrolled in each of two northern European centers. In an interventional center, vasospasm angioplasty was indicated as first line rather than rescue treatment of DCI using distal percutaneous balloon angioplasty technique combined with intravenous milrinone. In non-interventional center, induced hypertension was the only intensive therapy of DCI. Radiological DCI (new cerebral infarcts not visible on immediate post-treatment imaging), death at 1 month, and favorable outcome at 6 months (modified Rankin scale score ≤ 2) were retrospectively analyzed by independent observers and compared between two centers before and after propensity score (PS) matching for baseline characteristics.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics only differed between centers for age and rate of smokers and patients with chronic high blood pressure. In the interventional center, vasospasm angioplasty was performed in 38% of patients with median time from bleeding of 8 days (Q1 = 6.5;Q3 = 10). There was no significant difference of incidence of radiological DCI (9% vs.14%, P = 0.11), death (8% vs. 9%, P = 0.4), and favorable outcome 74% vs. 72% (P = 0.4) between interventional and non-interventional centers before and after PS matching.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest either that there is no benefit, or might be minimal, of one between two different center-driven strategies for intensive treatment of DCI. Despite potential lack of power or unknown confounders in our study, these results question the use of such intensive therapies in daily practice without further optimization and validation.