Association of gestational weight gain with cesarean section: a prospective birth cohort study in Southwest China

Esketamine pretreatment during cesarean section reduced the incidence of postpartum depression: a randomized controlled trail

BACKGROUND

Postpartum depression (PPD) is a common mental disease in postpartum women, which has received more and more attention in society. Ketamine has been confirmed for its rapid antidepressant effect in women with PPD. We speculate that esketamine, an enantiomer of ketamine, pretreatment during cesarean can also reduce the incidence of PPD.

METHODS

All the parturients enrolled in the study were randomly assigned to two groups: the esktamine group (0.2 mg/kg esketamine) and the control group (a same volume of saline). All the drugs were pumped for 40 min started from the beginning of the surgery. The Amsterdam Anxiety and Information Scale (APAIS) scores before the surgery, the Edinburgh postnatal depression scale (EPDS) scores at 4 d and 42 d after surgery, the Pain Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) scores at 6 h, 12 h, 24 h and 48 h post-operation were evaluated, as well as the adverse reactions were recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 319 parturients were analyzed in the study. The incidence of PPD (EPDS score > 9) in the esketamine group was lower than the control group at 4 days after surgery (13.8% vs 23.1%, P = 0.0430) but not 42 days after surgery (P = 0.0987). Esketamine 0.2 mg/kg could reduce the NRS score at 6 h,12 h and 24 h after surgery, as well as the use of vasoactive drugs during surgery (P < 0.05). The incidences of maternal dizziness (17.0%), blurred vision (5%), illusion (3.8%) and drowsiness (3.8%) in the esketamine group were higher than those of control group (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoperative injection of esketamine (0.2 mg/kg) prevented the occurrence of depression (EPDS score > 9) at 4 days after delivery but not 42 days. Esketamine reduced the NRS scores at 6 h, 12 h and 24 h after surgery, but the occurrence of maternal side effects such as dizziness, blurred vision, drowsiness and hallucination were increased.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2100053422) on 20/11/2021.

Effect of the smartphone application on caesarean section in women with overweight and obesity: a randomized controlled trial in China

BACKGROUND

The rate of caesarean section (CS) is increasing worldwide. While a CS can be life-saving when medically indicated, it can cause adverse health effects for both women and children. This trial aims to evaluate the effect of the smartphone application, which aims to control the gestational weight gain, on the rate of CS in overweight and obese women.

METHODS

Overweight and obese primiparas (BMI ≥ 24 kg/m2) with age between 20 and 40 years old were recruited at Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, and randomly assigned into the intervention group (143 cases) and the control group (138 cases). The intervention group applied the smartphone application (App) to control gestational weight gain in addition to the usual care, and the control group received the usual care. Primary outcome was cesarean section (CS) rate. Secondary outcomes included gestational hypertension, preeclampsia and eclampsia, gestational diabetes mellitus, postpartum hemorrhage, neonatal asphyxia, and macrosomia.

RESULTS

There was a significant difference in CS rate, with 53.3% in the intervention group and 65.4% in the control group (P = 0.044). The difference still exists in the overweight subgroup (32.6% vs. 55.6%, P = 0.04), but disappears in the obesity subgroup (63.0% vs. 69.1%, P = 0.381). The median of gestational weight gain (GWG) of the intervention group is 8.5 kg (IQR 5.5, 11.0), which is significantly less than that of the control group (median 10.0 kg, IQR [6.0, 14.0], P = 0.008). The intervention group has significantly lower rate of postpartum hemorrhage (5.19%) than the control group (12%) (P = 0.045). There were no significant differences between the groups in gestational hypertension, gestational diabetes mellitus, neonatal asphyxia, and macrosomia.

CONCLUSION

The smartphone assisted weight control may help reduce CS rate. The effects of the smartphone application might be via the management of gestational weight gain.

TRAIL REGISTRATION

This trial was registered at Chinese Clinical Trial Registry. Registration number is ChiCTR2300068845 (retrospectively registered, 01/03/2023).

An increase in cesarean section rate during the first wave of COVID-19 pandemic in Iran

BACKGROUND

The COVID-19 pandemic and its impact on healthcare services is likely to affect birth outcomes including the delivery mode. However, recent evidence has been conflicting in this regard. The study aimed to assess changes to C-section rate during the COVID-19 pandemic in Iran.

METHODS

This is a retrospective analysis of electronic medical records of women delivered in the maternity department of hospitals in all provinces of Iran before the COVID-19 pandemic (February-August 30, 2019) and during the pandemic (February-August 30, 2020). Data were collected through the Iranian Maternal and Neonatal Network (IMAN), a country-wide electronic health record database management system for maternal and neonatal information. A total of 1,208,671 medical records were analyzed using the SPSS software version 22. The differences in C-section rates according to the studied variables were tested using the χ2 test. A logistic regression analysis was conducted to determine the factors associated with C-section.

RESULTS

A significant rise was observed in the rates of C-section during the pandemic compared to the pre-pandemic (52.9% vs 50.8%; p = .001). The rates for preeclampsia (3.0% vs 1.3%), gestational diabetes (6.1% vs 3.0%), preterm birth (11.6% vs 6.9%), IUGR (1.2% vs 0.4%), LBW (11.2% vs 7.8%), and low Apgar score at first minute (4.2% vs 3.2%) were higher in women who delivered by C-section compared to those with normal delivery (P = .001).

CONCLUSIONS

The overall C-section rate during the first wave of COVID-19 pandemic was significantly higher than the pre-pandemic period. C-section was associated with adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Thus, preventing the overuse of C-section especially during pandemic becomes an urgent need for maternal and neonatal health in Iran.

Epidural esketamine and morphine for postoperative analgesia after caesarean delivery: A pilot study

Objective

The aim of this study was to determine whether the addition of esketamine to morphine would improve postoperative analgesia after cesarean section.

Methods

Parturients who planned for a cesarean delivery using combined spinal-epidural anesthesia with a request for postoperative anesthesia were randomly divided into four groups (A, B, C, and D). When the surgery was completed, the parturients in groups A, B, C, and D were administered 2 mg morphine, 0.25 mg/kg of esketamine, 0.25 mg/kg of esketamine plus 2 mg morphine hydrochloride, and 0.25 mg/kg of esketamine plus 1 mg morphine through the epidural catheters, respectively. The postoperative pain at rest, pain with movement, the number of rescue analgesics, and adverse effects were evaluated for 48 h after cesarean delivery.

Results

A total of 119 parturients were included in this study, including 30 cases in group A, 30 cases in group B, 30 cases in group C, and 29 cases in group D. All visual analog scale (VAS) scores at rest and with movement were much lower in group C as compared with those in group A and group B (P < 0.05). Moreover, VAS scores at rest were also lower in Group C than in group D for 24 h (P < 0.05). Corresponding to the low pain scores, parturients in group C also required less rescue analgesia as compared with the other three groups (P = 0.021 for C vs. A, P < 0.001 for C vs. B, and P < 0.001 for C vs. D). There were no statistically significant differences between the four study groups with regard to the incidence of adverse events (P > 0.05).

Conclusions

The addition of esketamine to morphine improved postoperative analgesia after cesarean section without increasing the incidence of adverse events.

What is an appropriate gestational weight gain for women with gestational diabetes mellitus: based on the adverse pregnancy outcomes of over 12 thousand participants?

BACKGROUND

Evidence showed possible benefits of a less gestational weight gain (GWG) than the US Institute of Medicine (IOM) recommendation in gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) pregnancy. Here, we aimed to explore an appropriate GWG range in GDM women according to adverse pregnancy outcomes.

METHODS

We enrolled all the singleton GDM pregnant women (n = 14,213) from January 2015 to December 2018 in Xi'an, Northwest China. According to the pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI), they were classified into the Underweight (< 18.5 kg/m²), Normal weight (18.5-24.9 kg/m²⁾, Overweight (25.0-29.9 kg/m²) and Obesity (≥ 30.0 kg/m²) group, respectively. Logistic regression analysis was used to calculate the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). The appropriate ranges of GWG were determined based on a significant protective association (OR < 1).

RESULTS

Totally, 12,712 participants were finally recruited. There were 1180 (9.3%), 9134 (71.9%), 2097 (16.5%), and 301 (2.4%) patients in the Underweight, Normal weight, Overweight, and Obesity groups, respectively. Adverse outcomes increased with the elevation of pre-pregnancy BMI. Among them, the risk of cesarean section was the highest, followed by large for gestational age (LGA), small for gestational age (SGA), preeclampsia, and gestational hypertension. Through the analysis of the risk of adverse outcomes in continuous GWG categories in each group, an ideal GWG range obtained in this study was as follows: 10-15.9 kg, 8-11.9 kg, 6-7.9 kg, and -5-3.9 kg for the Underweight, Normal weight, Overweight and Obesity group, respectively. Furthermore, the ranges in this study were more protective for adverse outcomes than those from IOM.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the adverse pregnancy outcomes of over 12 thousand participants, our findings showed a more stringent GWG range for GDM women than the IOM criteria recommendation.

The Value of Fetal Head Station as a Delivery Mode Predictor in Primiparous Women at Term before the Onset of Labor

Objective: Our objective was to demonstrate the role of the clinical determination of fetal head station (FHS) at term to predict the delivery mode in primiparous women before the onset of labor. Methods: This prospective study included unselected primiparous women at term who presented at our tertiary maternity. We excluded multiparous patients, pregnancies with a planned Cesarean section, non-cephalic presentations, and multiple pregnancies. The protocol included weekly clinical examinations to assess the FHS. The results were used to describe the clinical fetal head descent at term. We correlated the fetal head station determinations at each week with labor outcome, including the evaluations performed within the week before delivery. Results: The data show no significant differences between vaginal (VD) and Cesarean section delivery (CS) cases regarding FHS determined at each week at term. The median determinations at the gestational ages (GW) from 37 to 41 were −2 and −3, similar between the two groups, with a more consistent difference at 41 GW: station -1 for VD compared to −3 for CS. There were significant differences between the “week before delivery” evaluations of the two groups. The determinations showed for both groups similar minimum (−5), maximum (+1), and median (−2) FHS values. Most vaginal deliveries cases presented at weekly examinations with increasing rates toward more advanced stations: from 10% at station −4 to 35% at station −1. Although we investigated a low-risk group, we found significant differences between the vaginal and Cesarean groups in terms of age, weight, and BMI. We provided a multiple logistic regression equation that considered the predictive clinical variables at term: the fetal head situation, age, weight, height, and BMI. Conclusion: The clinical evaluation of fetal head station in primiparous before labor onset has a limited value regarding the prediction of the delivery mode. There is a potential benefit for the determinations performed within the week before delivery, but such a policy would require weekly assessments of the FHS at term, which is unlikely to be implemented. Another potential benefit would involve estimating labor outcomes in late-term or prolonged pregnancy. The fine tuning of the logistic prediction should be achieved by increasing the studied population and the number of centers involved before counseling primiparous women at term based on the clinical fetal engagement data.

Gestational Diabetes Mellitus as an Effect Modifier of the Association of Gestational Weight Gain with Perinatal Outcomes: A Prospective Cohort Study in China

The association of gestational weight gain (GWG) with perinatal outcomes seems to differ between women with and without gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). Whether GDM is an effect-modifier of the association has not been verified. This study aimed to assess the modifying effect of GDM on the association of GWG with perinatal outcomes. Data on 12,128 pregnant women (3013 with GDM and 9115 without GDM) were extracted from a prospective, multicenter, cohort study in China. The associations of total and trimester-specific GWG rates (GWGR) with perinatal outcomes, including small size for gestational age, large size for gestational age (LGA), preterm birth, cesarean delivery, and gestational hypertension disorders, were assessed. The modifying effect of GDM on the association was assessed on both multiplicative and additive scales, as estimated by mixed-effects logistic regression. As a result, total GWGR was associated with all of the perinatal outcomes. GDM modified the association of total GWGR with LGA and cesarean delivery on both scales (all p < 0.05) but did not modify the association with other outcomes. The modifying effect was observed in the third trimester but not in the first or the second trimester. Therefore, maternal GWG is associated with perinatal outcomes, and GDM modifies the association with LGA and cesarean delivery in the third trimester.