Study protocol of a randomized phase III trial of comparing preoperative chemoradiation with preoperative chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer or esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma: PREACT

More May Not Be Better: Comparison of Oncologic Outcomes Following Induction Chemotherapy Plus Chemoradiation and Chemoradiation Alone for Esophageal Adenocarcinoma

INTRODUCTION

The oncologic benefit of induction chemotherapy (IC) before chemoradiation (CRT) compared to CRT alone for locally advanced esophageal and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma is not well defined. We hypothesized that IC with CRT would improve survival and pathologic complete response rate compared to CRT alone.

METHODS

A retrospective review of patients with biopsy proven esophageal or GEJ adenocarcinoma treated with preoperative CRT and IC + CRT and surgical resection from 2007 to 2023 at a single institution was performed. First order outcomes were overall survival and pathologic complete response rate; secondary outcomes included disease-free survival and distant metastasis failure. Subgroup analyses were conducted based on baseline characteristics and tumor-specific features. Survival analysis was performed with Kaplan-Meier curves with log-rank tests and Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS

Of 205 patients that met inclusion criteria, 76 (38%) patients underwent IC + CRT. There were no significant differences in demographic or tumor-specific characteristics between the two cohorts. There were no differences in the median overall survival between CRT and IC + CRT groups (47 months vs. not reached, p = 0.194). The rate of pathologic complete response in the overall cohort was 22%; IC + CRT was not associated with higher complete tumor response than CRT alone (20% vs. 23%, p = 0.557). There were no significant differences in any of the secondary outcomes between the two treatment paradigms.

CONCLUSIONS

We could not detect added oncologic benefit in survival or pathologic complete response with IC over CRT alone for resectable esophageal and GEJ cancer. Biomarker driven prospective studies exploring the optimal perioperative treatment regimens are warranted.

Clinical effects of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy on complications and recurrence in patients with advanced gastric cancer

Objective

To compare the clinical effects of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) on complications and recurrence in patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC).

Method

This was a retrospective study. A total of 83 patients with AGC admitted to Chengde Central Hospital between Jan. 2019 and Jun. 2021 were selected and divided into the observation group(n=41) and the control group(n=42) using a random number table. Patients in the control group received XELOX chemotherapy, and those in the observation group received intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with concurrent XELOX chemotherapy. Compared efficacy, pathological complete response rate (pCR), R0 resection rate, adverse reactions, and quality of life (QOL) before and after treatment between the two groups.

Results

The efficacy, pCR, and R0 resection rate of the observation group were significantly increased compared with those of the control group. Comparison of complications showed the number of patients experiencing gastrointestinal (GI) reactions, increased BUN, increased GPT, alopecia, and pigmentation in the observation group was decreased compared with that in the control group, with no statistically significant differences(p>0.05), and the number of patients experiencing myelosuppression was statistically significant between the two groups(p<0.05). There were no significant differences in sub-scores of physical, role, emotional, cognitive, and social functions and the overall score of QOL between the two groups(p>0.05) before treatment.

Conclusion

NCRT is safer and more effective in patients with AGC compared with NCT, and can significantly improve the QOL of patients. It can be widely used in clinical practice.

Total neoadjuvant therapy in oesophageal and gastro-oesophageal junctional adenocarcinoma

Adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus and gastro-oesophageal junction represent a large burden of cancer death in the Western World with an increasing incidence. In the past two decades, the overall survival of patients on a potentially curative treatment pathway has more than doubled due to the addition of perioperative oncological therapies to surgery. However, patients often fail to respond to oncological treatment or struggle to complete their treatment after surgery. In this review, we discuss the current evidence for total neoadjuvant therapy and options for assessment of treatment response.

Preoperative chemoradiation-induced hematological toxicity and related vertebral dosimetry evaluations in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer: data from a phase III clinical trial

BACKGROUND

To explore the hematological toxicity (HT) induced by neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) compared with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT) and to identify the appropriate vertebral body (VB) dosimetric parameters for predicting HT in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer (GC).

METHODS

In the phase III study, 302 patients with GC from an ongoing multi-center randomized clinical trial (NCT01815853) were included. Patients from two major centers were grouped into training and external validation cohorts. The nCT group received three cycles of XELOX chemotherapy, while the nCRT received the same dose-reduced chemotherapy plus 45 Gy radiotherapy. The complete blood counts at baseline, during neoadjuvant treatment, and in the preoperative period were compared between the nCT and nCRT groups. The VB was retrospectively contoured and the dose-volume parameters were extracted in the nCRT group. Patients' clinical characteristics, VB dosimetric parameters, and HTs were statistically analyzed. Instances of HT were graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5.0 (CTCAE v5.0). The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated to identify the optimal cut-off points for dosimetric variables and verify the prediction efficiency of the dosimetric index in both training and external validation cohorts.

RESULTS

In the training cohort, 27.4% Grade 3 + HTs were noted in the nCRT group and 16.2% in the nCT group (P = 0.042). A similar result was exhibited in the validation cohort, with 35.0% Grade 3 + HTs in the nCRT group and 13.2% in the nCT group (P = 0.025). The multivariate analysis of the training cohort revealed that V₅ was associated with Grade 3 + leukopenia (P = 0.000), Grade 3 + thrombocytopenia (P = 0.001), and Grade 3 + total HTs (P = 0.042). The Spearman correlation analysis identified a significant correlation of V₅ with the white blood cell nadir (P = 0.0001) and platelet nadir (P = 0.0002). The ROC curve identified the optimal cut-off points for V₅ and showed that V₅ < 88.75% could indicate a decreased risk of Grade 3 + leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, and total HTs in the training as well as the external validation cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with nCT, nCRT could increase the risk of Grade 3 + HT in patients with locally advanced GC. Dose constraints of V₅ < 88.75% in irradiated VB could reduce the incidence of Grade 3 + HT.

Management of Esophago-Gastric Junction Carcinoma: A Narrative Multidisciplinary Review

Esophagogastric junction (EGJ) carcinoma represents a specific site of disease, given the opportunities for multimodal clinical care and management and the possibilities of combined treatments. It encompasses various clinical subgroups of disease that are heterogeneous and deserve different treatments; therefore, the guidelines have progressively evolved over time, considering the evidence provided by clinical trials. The aim of this narrative review was to summarize the main evidence, which orientates the current guidelines, and to collect the main ongoing studies to address existing gray areas.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of the outcomes following neoadjuvant therapy in upfront resectable gastric cancers compared to surgery alone in phase III randomised controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Gastric cancer is the fifth most common malignancy and the fourth most common cause of cancer mortality globally. The role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in upfront resectable gastric cancer is a subject of ongoing research. In recent meta-analyses, R0 resection rate and superior outcomes were not consistently observed in such regimens.

AIM

To describe the outcomes following phase III randomised control trials; comparing neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery against upfront surgery with and without adjuvant therapy in resectable gastric cancers.

METHODS

The Cochrane Library, CINAHL, EMBASE, PubMed, SCOPUS and Web of Science was searched from January 2002 to September 2022.

RESULTS

13 studies were included (3280 participants). R0 resection rates were in neoadjuvant therapy arms as compared to adjuvant therapy with odds ratio (OR) 1.55[95% CI: 1.13, 2.13](p=0.007) and compared to surgery alone OR 2.49[95% CI: 1.56, 3.96](p=0.0001). 3-year and 5-year progression-, event- and disease-free survival in neoadjuvant therapy as compared to adjuvant therapy were not significantly increased, 3-year OR 0.87[0.71, 1.07](p=0.19). Meanwhile, comparing neoadjuvant therapy to adjuvant therapy, 3-year overall survival (OS) hazard ratio was 0.88[95% CI: 0.70, 1.11](p=0.71) while 3- and 5-year OS OR was 1.18[95% CI: 0.90, 1.55], p=0.22 and 1.27[95% CI: 0.67, 2.42](p=0.47) respectively. Surgical complications were also more common with neoadjuvant therapy.

CONCLUSION

Neoadjuvant therapy yields higher rates of R0 resection. However, improved long-term survival was not seen as compared to adjuvant therapy. Large multi-centred randomised control trials with D2 lymphadenectomy should be performed to better evaluate the treatment modalities.

The Neo-PLANET phase II trial of neoadjuvant camrelizumab plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced adenocarcinoma of stomach or gastroesophageal junction

The synergistic effect of neoadjuvant immunotherapy and chemoradiotherapy in gastric adenocarcinoma is unclear. This phase II trial (NCT03631615) investigated this neoadjuvant combination in locally advanced adenocarcinoma of stomach or gastroesophageal junction. Thirty-six patients received capecitabine 850 mg/m2 twice daily and simultaneous radiotherapy for 5 weeks, sandwiched by a 21-day cycle of oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 (day 1) plus capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 twice daily (days 1-14), respectively, followed by surgery. Camrelizumab 200 mg (day 1) was given for 5 cycles since initiating chemotherapy. Primary endpoint was pathological complete response (pCR, ypT0) rate. Secondary endpoints included total pCR (tpCR, ypT0N0) rate, major pathological response (MPR, < 10% residual tumor cells) rate, margin-free (R0) resection rate, downstaging, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. The pCR rate was 33.3% (95% CI, 18.6-51.0), meeting pre-specified endpoint. TpCR, MPR, and R0 resection rates were 33.3%, 44.4%, and 91.7%, respectively. Twenty-eight (77.8%) patients reached ypN0. Two-year PFS and OS rates were 66.9% and 76.1%, respectively. The most common grade 3-4 adverse event was decreased lymphocyte count (27 [75.0%]). Neoadjuvant camrelizumab plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy exhibits promising pathological response in patients with locally advanced gastric adenocarcinoma, with an acceptable safety profile.

Neoadjuvant Chemo-Radiation Using IGRT in Patients with Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer

The goal of this study was to see how effective and safe neoadjuvant chemoradiation with image-guided IMRT was in patients with locally advanced resectable gastric cancer. Between January 2013 and June 2019, patients with locally advanced (cT3/cT4 or N+) gastric cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy at PUMCH (Peking Union Medical College Hospital) were retrospectively studied. Using concurrent chemotherapy (Capecitabine alone or XELOX*2 cycles), radiotherapy (IMRT (intensity-modulated radiation therapy) 45 Gy, 25#, 5 weeks) was delivered with IGRT (image-guided radiotherapy) before the start of each weeks therapy to ensure accuracy and repeatability. A total of 95 patients were enrolled in the study, 93 (97.9%) stage cT3/T4 and 85 (89.5%) stage N+. Of these, 85 patients (89.5%) had a tumor located in the upper 1/3 of the stomach, and 93/95 patients (97.9%) completed neoadjuvant chemoradiation, with 80 patients (84.2%) undergoing stomach resection (58 D2 and 22 D1 gastrostomies). Pathology downstaging was found in 68 patients (85.0%), with 66 patients (82.5%) receiving T downstaging and 56 patients (70.0%) receiving N downstaging. There were 11 individuals (13.8%) who had a pathological complete response (PCR). The average period of follow-up was 44.7 months (19-96 months). The 5-year OS (overall survival), LRFS (local recurrence-free survival), and DMFS (distant metastasis free survival) rates of patients were 47.0% (95% CI: 38.6-55.4), 86.55% (95% CI: 79.1-93.99) and 60.71% (95% CI: 51.49-69.93%), respectively. Thirteen (13.7%) patients had grade 3-4 leukopenia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia, while 9 (9.5%) patients had grade 3-4 anemia, and 5 (5.3%) patients had grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia. PCR was found to be a significant predictive factor for OS in multivariate analysis (HR = 11.211, 95% CI: 1.500-83.813, p = 0.024). The method of using IGRT image-guided IMRT (45 Gy, 25 fractions, 5 weeks) combined with concurrent chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced resectable gastric cancer was equally effective when compared to the clinical efficacy of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, with clinical outcomes achieving equal efficacy, with similar PCR rates and high rates of OS, LRFS, and DMFS, as well as good tolerances of concurrent chemoradiotherapy with acceptable side effects.

Identification of a Hypoxia-Angiogenesis lncRNA Signature Participating in Immunosuppression in Gastric Cancer

Hypoxia and angiogenesis are the leading causes of tumor progression, and their strong correlation has been discovered in many cancers. However, their collective function's prognostic and biological roles were not reported in gastric cancer. Hence, we aimed to investigate the effects of hypoxia and angiogenesis on gastric cancer via sequencing data. This study used weighted gene coexpression network analysis and random forest regression to build a hypoxia-angiogenesis-related model (HARM) via the TCGA-STAD lncRNA data. It estimated the HARM's correlation with clinical features and its accuracy for survival prediction. Sequential functional analyses were conducted to investigate its biological role, and we next sought the immune landscape status and immunological function variation by ESTIMATE score calculation and GSVA, respectively. Seven different algorithms were conducted to assess the immunocyte infiltration, and TIDE score and immune checkpoint levels were compared between the high- and low-HARM groups. As a result, we found that HARM predicted patient survival with high accuracy and was correlated with higher stages of gastric cancer. Various cancer-associated pathways and macrophage-related regulations were upregulated in the high-HRAM group. The high-HARM group harbored higher immune levels, and M2 macrophages and cancer-associated fibroblasts were particularly highly unfiltered. Furthermore, globally upregulated immune checkpoints and higher TIDE scores were observed in the high-HARM group. Finally, we filtered eight drugs with lower IC50 in the high-HARM group as potential drugs for the HARM-targeted therapy. We believe this study opens up novel perspectives into the interaction between hypoxia-angiogenesis and immunosuppression and will provide novel insights for gastric cancer immunotherapy.

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for resectable gastric cancer: A meta-analysis

Objectives

To evaluate the clinical curative effects and toxicity of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for resectable gastric cancer compared to those of neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Methods

A systematic review and meta-analysis of the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy were performed in patients with resectable gastric cancer.

Results

Seven RCTs were included (601 patients; 302 in the neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy group and 299 in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group). The neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy group had an increased number of patients with a complete response [odds ratio (OR) = 3.79, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.68–8.54, p = 0.001] and improved objective response rate (OR = 2.78, 95% CI: 1.69–4.57, p < 0.0001), 1-year (OR = 3.51, 95% CI: 1.40–8.81, p = 0.007) and 3-year (OR = 2.14, 95% CI: 1.30–3.50, p = 0.003) survival rates, R0 resection rate (OR = 2.21, 95% CI: 1.39–3.50, p = 0.0008), and complete pathologic response (OR = 4.39, 95% CI: 1.59–12.14, p = 0.004). Regarding the incidence of adverse effects after neoadjuvant therapy, only the occurrence rate of gastrointestinal reaction in the neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy group was higher than that in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group (OR = 1.76, 95% CI: 1.09–2.85, p = 0.02), and there was no significant difference in other adverse effects. There was no difference in the incidence of postoperative complications between the two groups.

Conclusion

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for resectable gastric cancer has several advantages in terms of efficacy and safety compared to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Therefore, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy has great potential as an effective therapy for resectable gastric cancers.

Systematic Review Registration

https://inplasy.com/inplasy-2022-3-0164, registration number INPLASY202230164.

Total neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced gastric cancer and esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma: study protocol for a prospective, multicenter, single-arm, phase II clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Gastric cancer ranks high in terms of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Multimodal therapy is therefore essential for locally advanced gastric cancer. Recent studies have demonstrated that both perioperative chemotherapy and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy can improve the prognosis of patients. However, the completion rate of chemotherapy after surgery remains low, which may affect survival. Thus, identifying the best way to combine radiotherapy, chemotherapy and surgery is important. The aim of this study was to explore the toxicity and efficacy of the total neoadjuvant therapy modality for locally advanced gastric cancer.

METHODS

This study will be a prospective, multicenter, single-arm, phase II clinical trial. Patients diagnosed with locally advanced (stage cT3-4 and cN positive, AJCC 8th) gastric cancer and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma will be enrolled. Patients will initially receive radiotherapy (95% planned target volume: 45 Gy/25 f) and concurrent chemotherapy (S-1: 40-60 mg twice a day) followed by six cycles of consolidated chemotherapy (SOX, consisting of S-1 and oxaliplatin) and surgery. The primary objective will assess pathological complete response; the secondary objectives will include toxicities assessing surgical complications, the tumor downstaging rate and the R0 resection rate.

DISCUSSION

Investigation of total neoadjuvant therapy in gastric cancer is limited. The goal of this trial is to explore the efficacy and toxicity of total neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced gastric cancer and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04062058, August 20, 2019).

A study protocol of a randomized phase II trial of perioperative chemoimmunotherapy verses perioperative chemoimmunotherapy plus preoperative chemoradiation for locally advanced gastric (G) or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma: the NeoRacing study

BACKGROUND

Perioperative chemotherapy (ChT) and preoperative chemoradiation (CRT) are both the standard treatments for locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC). CRT can achieve a higher pathological complete regression (pCR) rate, but whether this higher pCR rate can be transformed into a long-term survival benefit remains inconclusive. Therefore, relevant studies are in progress. On the other hand, immunotherapy has been established for the first-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer (AGC) and has been widely explored in the perioperative setting. The combination of chemotherapy/radiotherapy and immunotherapy may have a synergistic effect, which will lead to a better antitumor effect. The preliminary reports of ongoing studies show promising results, including a further improved pCR rate. However, the preferred treatment combination for LAGC is still not established. To solve this problem, we are carrying out this randomized phase II trial, which aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of perioperative chemotherapy plus the use of PD-1 antibody with or without preoperative chemoradiation for LAGC.

METHODS

Eligible patients with LAGC or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma were randomized to receive perioperative ChT, PD-1 antibody, surgery with (Arm A) or without preoperative CRT (Arm B), and PD-1 antibody maintenance until one year after surgery. The primary endpoint of this study is that the pCR rate of Arm A will be significantly higher than that of Arm B. The secondary endpoints include the pathological partial regression (pPR) rate, R0 resection rate, objective response rate (ORR), event-free survival (EFS), overall survival (OS), safety and surgical complications. Moreover, several explorative endpoints will be evaluated to find and validate the predictive biomarkers of immunotherapy.

DISCUSSION

The results of the NeoRacing study will provide important information concerning the application of PD-1 antibody in LAGC patients during the perioperative setting. Meanwhile, the two treatment protocols will be compared in terms of efficacy and safety.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT05161572 . Registered 17 December 2021 - Retrospectively registered.

Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: Where Are We at?

Locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) has a poor prognosis with surgical resection alone, and neoadjuvant treatment has been recommended to improve surgical and oncological outcomes. Although neoadjuvant chemotherapy has been established to be effective for LAGC, the role of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) remains under investigation. Clinical experience and research evidence on esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma (e.g., cardia gastric cancers) indicate that the likelihood of achieving sustainable local control is higher through NCRT than through resection alone. Furthermore, NCRT also has an acceptable treatment-related toxicity and adverse event profile. In particular, it increases the likelihood of achieving an R0 resection and a pathological complete response (pCR). Moreover, NCRT results in higher overall and recurrence-free survival rates than surgery alone; however, evidence on the survival benefits of NCRT versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) remains conflicting. For noncardia gastric cancer, the efficacy of NCRT has mostly been reported in retrospective studies, and several large clinical trials are ongoing. Consequently, NCRT might play a more essential role in unresectable LAGC, for which NCT alone may not be adequate to attain disease control. The continual improvements in systemic treatments, radiotherapy techniques, and emerging biomarkers can also lead to improved personalized therapy for NCRT. To elucidate the contributions of NCRT to gastric cancer treatment in the future, the efficacy, potential toxicity, predictive biomarkers, and clinical considerations for implementing NCRT in different types of LAGC were reviewed.

Current and future strategies for radiation therapy in gastric cancer

Gastric cancers are heterogeneous. There are important differences between gastric and junctional tumors and a focus on evidence based on true gastric cancers is important to guide treatment decision and the design of innovative strategies. We present key evidence shaping the current use of radiotherapy, discuss technical radiotherapy considerations that are important to consider in multidisciplinary decision-making, and highlight selected research strategies including radiotherapeutic advances, theranostic approaches and key ongoing clinical trials to watch that will shape the role of radiotherapy in gastric cancers for the future.

Proliferation Cycle Transcriptomic Signatures are Strongly associated With Gastric Cancer Patient Survival

Gastric cancer is one of the most heterogeneous tumors with multi-level molecular disturbances. Sustaining proliferative signaling and evading growth suppressors are two important hallmarks that enable the cancer cells to become tumorigenic and ultimately malignant, which enable tumor growth. Discovering and understanding the difference in tumor proliferation cycle phenotypes can be used to better classify tumors, and provide classification schemes for disease diagnosis and treatment options, which are more in line with the requirements of today's precision medicine. We collected 691 eligible samples from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database, combined with transcriptome data, to explore different heterogeneous proliferation cycle phenotypes, and further study the potential genomic changes that may lead to these different phenotypes in this study. Interestingly, two subtypes with different clinical and biological characteristics were identified through cluster analysis of gastric cancer transcriptome data. The repeatability of the classification was confirmed in an independent Gene Expression Omnibus validation cohort, and consistent phenotypes were observed. These two phenotypes showed different clinical outcomes, and tumor mutation burden. This classification helped us to better classify gastric cancer patients and provide targeted treatment based on specific transcriptome data.

Development of a Quantitative Diagnostic Criterion for Gastric Linitis Plastica: Findings From a Large Single-Institutional Study

Gastric linitis plastica (GLP) is a descriptive term but lacks a quantitative definition. Several relatively quantitative criteria had been proposed, such as tumor involving a limit of one-third or two-thirds of the gastric surface. However, these criteria needed doctors to subjectively judge tumor infiltration area, which made diagnosis difficult to be objective and reproducible. This study aimed to propose a quantitative diagnostic criterion for distinguishing GLP. We performed a retrospective cohort study of 2,907 patients with Borrmann III and IV gastric cancer (GC) who underwent gastrectomy between 2011 and 2018 in our center. The Kaplan–Meier curves showed that patients with an observed tumor size more than 8 cm had obviously lower overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates than those with a size less than 8 cm(p < 0.001; p < 0.001). However, there was no significantly different prognosis of patients with tumor sizes between more than 8 cm and more than 10 cm (p = 0.248; p = 0.534). Moreover, patients with tumor sizes greater than 8 cm more presented with advanced stage and had extremely poor 3-year OS and DFS (31.4%; 29.3%), with a stronger propensity toward peritoneal metastasis. Therefore, we considered patients’ observed tumor size more than 8 cm as a critical value for distinguishing the prognosis of Borrmann III and IV GC. Furthermore, we proposed an observed tumor size more than 8 cm as a quantitative diagnostic criterion for GLP on the premise of satisfying the originally descriptive and pathological definition regardless of Borrmann type.

Neo-adjuvant radiation therapy provides a survival advantage in T3-T4 nodal positive gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: a SEER database analysis

BACKGROUND

Due to negative results in clinical trials of postoperative chemoradiation for gastric cancer, at present, there is a tendency to move chemoradiation therapy forward in gastric and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma. Several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are currently recruiting subjects to investigate the effect of neo-adjuvant radiotherapy (NRT) in gastric and GEJ cancer. Large retrospective studies may be beneficial in clarifying the potential benefit of NRT, providing implications for RCTs.

METHODS

We retrieved the clinicopathological and treatment data of gastric and GEJ adenocarcinoma patients who underwent surgical resection and chemotherapy between 2004 and 2015 from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. We compared survival between NRT and non-NRT patients among four clinical subgroups (T_1-2N^-, T_1-2N⁺, T_3-4N^-, and T_3-4N⁺).

RESULTS

Overall, 5272 patients were identified, among which 1984 patients received NRT. After adjusting confounding variables, significantly improved survival between patients with and without NRT was only observed in T_3-4N⁺ subgroup [hazard ratio (HR) 0.79, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.66-0.95; P = 0.01]. Besides, Kaplan-Meier plots showed significant cause-specific survival advantage of NRT in intestinal type (P <  0.001), but not in diffuse type (P = 0.11) for T_3-4N⁺ patients. In the multivariate competing risk model, NRT still showed survival advantage only in T_3-4 N⁺ patients (subdistribution HR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.64-0.93; P = 0.006), but not in other subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

NRT might benefit resectable gastric and GEJ cancer patients of T3-4 stages with positive lymph nodes, particularly for intestinal-type. Nevertheless, these results should be interpreted with caution, and more data from ongoing RCTs are warranted.

Multidisciplinary treatment strategy for locally advanced gastric cancer: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Multidisciplinary management of patients with locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) remains unstandardized worldwide. We performed a systemic review to summarize the advancements, regional differences, and current recommended multidisciplinary treatment strategies for LAGC.

METHODS

Eligible studies were identified through a comprehensive search of PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library databases and Embase. Phase 3 randomized controlled trials which investigated survival of patients with LAGC who underwent gastrectomy with pre-/perioperative, postoperative chemotherapy, or chemoradiotherapy were included.

RESULTS

In total, we identified 11 studies of pre-/perioperative chemotherapy, 38 of postoperative chemotherapy, and 14 of chemoradiotherapy. In Europe and the USA, the current standard of care is perioperative chemotherapy for patients with LAGC using the regimen of 5-FU, folinic acid, oxaliplatin and docetaxel (FLOT). In Eastern Asia, upfront gastrectomy and postoperative chemotherapy is commonly used. The S-1 monotherapy or a regimen of capecitabine and oxaliplatin (CapOx) are used for patients with stage II disease, and the CapOx regimen or the S-1 plus docetaxel regimen are recommended for those with stage III Gastric cancer (GC). The addition of postoperative radiotherapy to peri- or postoperative chemotherapy is currently not recommended. Additionally, clinical trials testing targeted therapy and immunotherapy are increasingly performed worldwide.

CONCLUSIONS

Recent clinical trials showed a survival benefit of peri-over postoperative chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy. As such, this strategy may have a potential as a global standard for patients with LAGC. Outcome of the ongoing clinical trials is expected to establish the global standard of multidisciplinary treatment strategy in patients with LAGC.

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by laparoscopic distal gastrectomy in advanced gastric cancer: A case report and review of literature

BACKGROUND

The laparoscopic technique has been widely applied for early gastric cancer, with the advantages of minimal invasion and quick recovery. However, there is no report about the safety and oncological outcome of laparoscopic gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection for patients after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

CASE SUMMARY

A 60-year-old man was diagnosed with advanced distal gastric cancer, cT4aN1M0 stage III. The neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy was performed based on the regimen of gross tumor volume 50G y/25 f and clinical target volume 45 Gy/25 f, as well as concurrent S-1 60 mg Bid. Then laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection was undertaken successfully for him after achieving partial response evaluated by radiological examination. The patient recovered smoothly without moderate or severe postoperative complications. The postoperative pathological stage was ypT3N0M0 with American Joint Committee on Cancer tumor regression grade 1. He was still in good condition after 5 years of follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by laparoscopic technique could be applicable and may achieve satisfactory oncological outcomes. Our finding requires further validation by cohort studies.

Disease Site-Specific Guidelines for Curative Radiation Treatment During 'Limited Surgery' and 'Hospital Avoidance': A Radiation Oncology Perspective From the Epicenter of COVID-19 Pandemic

The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in an unprecedented situation where the standard of care (SOC) management for cancers has been altered significantly. Patients with potentially curable cancers are at risk of not receiving timely SOC multidisciplinary treatments, such as surgery, chemotherapy, radiation therapy, or combination treatments. Hospital resources are in such high demand for COVID-19 patients that procedures, such as surgery, dentistry, interventional radiology, and other ancillary services, are not available for cancer patients. Our tertiary care center is considered the center of the epicenter in the USA. As a result, all non-emergent surgeries have been suspended in order to provide hospital beds and other resources for COVID-19 patients.

Additionally, ambulatory efforts to avoid treatment-related morbidity are critical for keeping patients out of emergency departments and hospitals. In this review article, we discuss evidence-based radiation therapy approaches for curable cancer patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. We focus on three scenarios of cancer care: 1) radiation therapy as an alternative to surgery when immediate surgery is not possible, 2) radiation therapy as a ‘bridge’ to surgery, and 3) radiation options definitively or postoperatively, given the risk of hospitalization with high-dose chemotherapy.