Impact of concomitant systemic treatments on toxicity and intracerebral response after stereotactic radiotherapy for brain metastases

Predictive value of perilesional edema volume in melanoma brain metastasis response to stereotactic radiosurgery

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) is an established treatment for melanoma brain metastases (MBM). Recent evidence suggests that perilesional edema volume (PEV) might compromise the delivery and efficacy of radiotherapy to treat BM. This study investigated the association between SRT efficacy and PEV extent in MBM.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study reviewed medical records from January 2020 to September 2023. Patients with up to 5 measurable MBMs, intracranial disease per RANO/iRANO criteria, and on low-dose corticosteroids were included. MRI scans assessed baseline neuroimaging, with PEV analyzed using 3D Slicer. SRT plans were based on MRI-CT fusion, delivering 18-32.5 Gy in 1-5 fractions. Outcomes included intracranial objective response rate (iORR) and survival measures (L-iPFS and OS). Statistical analysis involved decision tree analysis and multivariable logistic regression, adjusting for clinical and treatment variables.

RESULTS

Seventy-two patients with 101 MBM were analyzed, with a mean age of 68.83 years. The iORR was 61.4%, with Complete Response (CR) in 21.8% and Partial Response (PR) in 39.6% of the treated lesions. PEV correlated with KPS, BRAF status, and treatment response. Decision tree analysis identified a PEV cutoff at 0.5 cc, with lower PEVs predicting better responses (AUC = 0.82 sensitivity: 86.7%, specificity:74.4%,). Patients with PEV ≥ 0.5 cc had lower response rates (iORR 44.7% vs. 63.8%, p < 0.001). Median OS was 9.4 months, with L-iPFS of 27 months. PEV significantly impacted survival outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

A more extensive PEV was associated with a less favorable outcome to SRT in MBM.

Diagnosis and management of brain radiation necrosis

Brain radiation necrosis (BRN) is a significant and complex side effect of stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT). Differentiating BRN from local tumor recurrence is critical, requiring advanced diagnostic techniques and a multidisciplinary approach. BRN typically manifests months to years post-treatment, presenting with radiological changes on MRI and may produce neurological symptoms. Key risk factors include the volume of irradiated brain tissue, the radiation dose, and prior radiotherapy history. This manuscript reviews the diagnostic process for BRN, emphasizing the importance of assessing baseline risk, clinical evaluation, and advanced imaging modalities. Multimodal imaging enhances diagnostic accuracy and aids in distinguishing BRN from tumor relapse. Therapeutic management varies based on symptoms. Asymptomatic BRN may be monitored with regular imaging, while symptomatic BRN often requires corticosteroids to reduce inflammation. Emerging therapies like bevacizumab have shown promise in clinical trials, with significant radiographic and symptomatic improvement. Surgical intervention may be necessary for histological confirmation and severe, treatment-resistant cases. Ongoing research aims to improve diagnostic accuracy and treatment efficacy, enhancing patient outcomes and quality of life. This review underscores the need for a multidisciplinary approach and continuous advancements to address the challenges posed by BRN in brain tumor patients.

Very early symptomatic metastasis pseudoprogression after stereotactic brain radiosurgery in a melanoma patient treated with BRAF/MEK inhibitors: a case report and review of the literature

Introduction

Significant therapeutic changes have recently occurred in the management of melanoma brain metastases (BMs), both in the field of local treatments, with the rise of stereotactic radiotherapy (RT), as well as in systemic ones, with the advent of immunotherapy and targeted therapies (TT). These advances have brought about new challenges, particularly regarding the potential interactions between new TT (notably BRAF/MEK inhibitors) and irradiation. Through a clinical case, we will discuss a side effect not previously described in the literature: ultra-early pseudoprogression (PP) following brain stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), in a patient treated with dabrafenib-trametinib.

Case presentation

A 61-year-old patient with BRAFV600E-mutated melanoma, receiving second-line dabrafenib-trametinib therapy, was referred for SRS on three progressing meningeal implants, without evidence of systemic progression. Four days after the first RT session (1x6 Gy on a fronto-orbital lesion prescribed 5x6 Gy, and 1x20 Gy single fraction on the other lesions), the patient presented with an epileptic seizure. An MRI, compared to the planning MRI ten days earlier, revealed significant progression of the irradiated lesions. The patient's condition improved with dexamethasone and levetiracetam, and RT was halted out of caution. A follow-up MRI at one month demonstrated a size reduction of all treated lesions. Subsequent imaging at five months revealed further shrinking of the two lesions treated with an ablative dose of 20 Gy, while the under-treated fronto-orbital lesion progressed. These dynamics suggest an initial PP in the three irradiated lesions, followed by good response in the ablatively treated lesions and progression in the partially treated lesion.

Conclusion

To our knowledge, this represents the first documented case of ultra-early PP following brain SRS in a patient receiving concomitant dabrafenib-trametinib. It highlights the need for particular vigilance when using tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) with SRS, and warrants further research into potential treatment interactions between RT and novel systemic agents, as well as the optimal treatment sequence of melanoma BMs.

The dosimetric parameters impact on local recurrence in stereotactic radiotherapy for brain metastases

OBJECTIVES

Stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) for brain metastases (BM) allows very good local control (LC). However, approximately 20%-30% of these lesions will recur. The objective of this retrospective study was to evaluate the impact of dosimetric parameters on LC in cerebral SRT.

METHODS

Patients treated with SRT for 1-3 BM between January 2015 and December 2018 were retrospectively included. A total of 349 patients with 538 lesions were included. The median gross tumour volume (GTV) was 2 cm3 (IQR, 0-7). The median biological effective dose with α/β = 10 (BED10) was 60 Gy (IQR, 32-82). The median prescription isodose was 71% (IQR, 70-80). Correlations with LC were examined using the Cox regression model.

RESULTS

The median follow-up period was 55 months (min-max, 7-85). Median overall survival was 17.8 months (IQR, 15.2-21.9). There were 95 recurrences and LC at 1 and 2 years was 87.1% (95% CI, 84-90) and 78.1% (95% CI, 73.9-82.4), respectively. Univariate analysis showed that systemic treatment, dose to 2% and 50% of the planning target volume (PTV), BED10 > 50 Gy, and low PTV and GTV volume were significantly correlated with better LC. In the multivariate analysis, GTV volume, isodose, and BED10 were significantly associated with LC.

CONCLUSION

These results show the importance of a BED10 > 50 Gy associated with a prescription isodose <80% to optimize LC during SRT for BM.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

Isodose, BED, and GTV volume were significantly associated with LC. A low isodose improves LC without increasing the risk of radionecrosis.

Global research landscape and trends of cancer radiotherapy plus immunotherapy: A bibliometric analysis

The aim of this study was to present current research trends on the synergistic use of radiotherapy and immunotherapy (IRT) for cancer treatment. On March 1, 2023, we conducted a literature search for IRT papers using the Web of Science database. We extracted information and constructed two databases - the Core Database (CD) with 864 papers and Generalized Database (GD) with 6344 papers. A bibliometric analysis was performed to provide insights into the research landscape, to identify emerging trends and highly cited papers and journals in the field of IRT. The CD contained 864 papers that were collectively cited 31,818 times. Prominent journals in this area included the New England Journal of Medicine, Lancet Oncology, and the Journal of Clinical Oncology. Corresponding authors from the USA contributed the most publications. In recent years, lung cancer, melanoma, stereotactic radiotherapy, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and the tumor microenvironment emerged as hot research areas. This bibliometric analysis presented quantitative insights into research concerning IRT and proposed potential avenues for further exploration. Moreover, researchers can use our findings to select appropriate journals for publication or identify prospective collaborators. In summary, this bibliometric analysis provides a comprehensive overview of the historical progression and recent advancements in IRT research that may serve as inspiration for future investigations.

The Safety and Efficacy of Concurrent Immune Checkpoint Blockade and Stereotactic Radiosurgery Therapy with Practitioner and Researcher Recommendations

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown growing promise in the treatment of brain metastases, especially combined with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). The combination of ICIs with SRS has been studied for efficacy as well as increasing radiation necrosis risks. In this review, we compare clinical outcomes of radiation necrosis, intracranial control, and overall survival between patients with brain metastases treated with either SRS alone or SRS-ICI combination therapy.

METHODS

A literature search of PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane was performed in May 2023 for articles comparing the safety and efficacy of SRS/ICI versus SRS-alone for treating brain metastases.

RESULTS

The search criteria identified 1961 articles, of which 48 met inclusion criteria. Combination therapy with SRS and ICI does not lead to significant increases in incidence of radiation necrosis either radiographically or symptomatically. Overall, no difference was found in intracranial control between SRS-alone and SRS-ICI combination therapy. Combination therapy is associated with increased median overall survival. Notably, some comparative studies observed decreased neurologic deaths, challenging presumptions that improved survival is due to greater systemic control. The literature supports SRS-ICI administration within 4 weeks of another for survival but remains inconclusive, requiring further study for other outcome measures.

CONCLUSIONS

Combination SRS-ICI therapy is associated with significant overall survival benefit for patients with brain metastases without significantly increasing radiation necrosis risks compared to SRS alone. Although intracranial control rates appear to be similar between the 2 groups, timing of treatment delivery may improve control rates and demands further study attention.

RT-based combination therapy for brain metastasis from NSCLC with non-EGFR mutation/ALK gene rearrangement: A network meta-analysis

Introduction

Radiotherapy (RT) is currently the main treatment for brain metastases (BMs) from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Due to the short survival time and obvious adverse reactions of RT, we urgently need more appropriate treatment. This network meta-analysis reviewed the efficacy and adverse effects of radiotherapy-based combination therapy for patients without targeted epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations/anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene rearrangement NSCLC BMs, to screen out the therapy with the best efficacy.

Methods

PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched from the earliest publication date available to 1 April 2022. STATA15.0 was used to conduct heterogeneity analysis, sensitivity analysis, forest plot analysis, and publication bias analysis.

Results

A total of 28 studies, involving 3707 patients were included in the Bayesian network meta-analysis. In the limited paired meta-analysis for head-to-head comparative trials, compared with RT-based combination therapy, RT combined with Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) showed significant overall survival (OS) benefit (HR 0.65, 95%CI 0.47–0.9, p&lt;0.01), RT combined with ICIs showed a non-significant difference for intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS) (HR 0.76, 95%CI 0.27–2.27, p&lt;0.01) and progression-free survival (PFS) (HR 0.9, 95%CI 0.36–2.37, p&lt;0.01). In addition, according to the ranking results, compared with RT combined with chemotherapy(CT) or with targeted therapy(TT), RT combined with ICIs might be the best treatment mode for OS(ICIs+RT vs CT+RT vs TT+RT; 91.9% vs. 27.8% vs. 29.3%, iPFS (ICIs+RT vs CT+RT vs TT+RT, 46.9% vs 25.2% vs 25.6%) and PFS (ICIs+RT vs CT+RT vs TT+RT, 36.2% vs 31% vs 36.5%).

Conclusions

RT combined with ICIs might be the best treatment mode to prolong the OS for BMs from NSCLC with non-EGFR mutation/ALK gene rearrangement.

Review Registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42022350065, identifier (CRD42022350065)

[Efficacy and Safety of Radiotherapy Combined with Immunotherapy for Brain Metastases from Lung Cancer: A Meta-analysis]

BACKGROUND

Immunotherapy (IT) is recommended for the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), while brain radiotherapy (RT) is the mainstream treatment for patients with brain metastases (BM). This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of combined use of RT and IT.

METHODS

The date was limited to May 1, 2022, and literature searches were carried out in CNKI, Wanfang, PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane databases. Heterogeneity was judged using the I2 test and P value. Publication bias was assessed using a funnel plot. The quality of included studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). Statistical analysis was performed using Stata 16.0 software.

RESULTS

A total of 17 articles involving 2,636 patients were included. In the comparison of RT+IT group and RT group, no significant difference was found in overall survival (OS) (HR=0.85, 95%CI: 0.52-1.38, I2=73.9%, Pheterogeneity=0.001) and intracranial distance control (DBC) (HR=1.04, 95%CI: 0.55-1.05, I2=80.5%, Pheterogeneity<0.001), but the intracranial control (LC) in the RT+IT group was better than the RT group (HR=0.46, 95%CI: 0.22-0.94, I2=22.2%, Pheterogeneity=0.276), and the risk of radiation necrosis/treatment-related imaging changes (RN/TRIC) was higher than RT (HR=1.72, 95%CI: 1.12-2.65, I2=40.2%, Pheterogeneity=0.153). In the comparison between the RT+IT concurrent group and the sequential group, no significant difference was found in OS (HR=0.62, 95%CI: 0.27-1.43, I2=74.7%, Pheterogeneity=0.003) and RN/TRIC (HR=1.72, 95%CI: 0.85-3.47, I2=0%, Pheterogeneity=0.388) was different between the two groups. However, DBC in the concurrent treatment group was better than that in the sequential treatment group (HR=0.77, 95%CI: 0.62-0.96, I2=80.5%, Pheterogeneity<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

RT combined with IT does not improve the OS of NSCLC patients with BM, but also increases the risk of RN/TRIC. In addition, compared with sequential RT and IT, concurrent RT and IT improved the efficacy of DBC.

Efficacy and Safety of Combined Brain Stereotactic Radiotherapy and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer with Brain Metastases

Background: To analyze the outcomes of patients with brain metastases (BM) from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with immunotherapy (IT) and stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) and to study the impact of the sequence between the two modalities. Methods: The authors reviewed the records of 51 patients with 84 BM from NSCLC treated at Institut Curie with IT and SRT. BM were categorized into three groups: ‘SRT before IT’, ‘concurrent SRT and IT’, and ‘SRT after IT.’ Regional progression-free interval (R-PFI) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Results: After a median follow-up from SRT of 22.5 months (2.7–47.3), the 1-year and 2-year OS were 69.7% (95%CI [58.0–83.8]) and 44.0% [30.6–63.2], respectively. Concerning distant intracranial control, the 1-year and 2-year R-PFI were 40.1% [30.1–53.3] and 35.2% [25.1–49.4], respectively. Moreover, one-year R-PFI in ‘SRT before IT’, ‘concurrent SRT and IT’, and ‘SRT after IT’ groups were 24.1%, 49.6%, and 34.2%, respectively (p = 0.094). The type of therapeutic sequence did not appear to impact the risk of brain necrosis. Conclusions: The concurrent administration of SRT and IT appeared to offer the best locoregional control, without increasing the risk of toxicity, compared to patients treated with SRT before or after IT.

International consensus on radiotherapy in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide, with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounting for most cases. While radiotherapy has historically served as a palliative modality in metastatic NSCLC, considerable advances in its technology and the continuous development of cutting-edge therapeutic agents, such as targeted therapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), are increasing its role in the multi-disciplinary management of the disease.

METHODS

International radiotherapy experts were convened to consider and reach consensuses on the clinical utilities of radiotherapy in metastatic NSCLC, with the aim to provide patient-focused, up to date, evidence-based, recommendations to assist cancer specialists in the management of patients with metastatic NSCLC worldwide.

RESULTS

Timely radiotherapy can offer rapid symptom alleviation and allow subsequent aggressive treatment approaches in patients with heavy tumor burden and/or oncologic emergencies. In addition, appropriate incorporation of radiotherapy as concurrent, consolidation, or salvage therapy makes it possible to achieve long-term survival, or even cure, for patients with oligo-metastatic disease. Cranial radiotherapy plays an important role in the management of brain metastasis, potentially augmenting the response and prolonging survival associated with targeted agents and ICIs. However, key questions remain, such as the appropriate choice of radiation techniques, optimal sequence of systemic therapies and radiotherapy, and optimal patient selection for such combination strategies. Although a strong rationale for combining radiotherapy and ICIs exists, its optimal parameters in this setting remain to be established.

CONCLUSIONS

In the modern era, radiotherapy serves not only as a palliative tool in metastatic NSCLC, but also plays active roles in patients with oligo-focal disease, CNS metastasis and receiving ICIs.

Ways to improve breast cancer patients' management and clinical outcome: The 2020 Assisi Think Tank Meeting

We report on the third Assisi Think Tank Meeting (ATTM) on breast cancer, a brainstorming project which involved European radiation and clinical oncologists who were dedicated to breast cancer research and treatment. Held on February 2020, the ATTM aimed at identifying key clinical questions in current clinical practice and "grey" areas requiring research to improve management and outcomes. Before the meeting, three key topics were selected: 1) managing patients with frailty due to either age and/or multi-morbidity; 2) stereotactic radiation therapy and systemic therapy in the management of oligometastatic disease; 3) contralateral breast tumour prevention in BCRA-mutated patients. Clinical practice in these areas was investigated by means of an online questionnaire. In the lapse period between the survey and the meeting, the working groups reviewed data, on-going studies and the clinical challenges which were then discussed in-depth and subjected to intense brainstorming during the meeting; research protocols were also proposed. Methodology, outcome of discussions, conclusions and study proposals are summarized in the present paper. In conclusion, this report presents an in-depth analysis of the state of the art, grey areas and controversies in breast cancer radiation therapy and discusses how to confront them in the absence of evidence-based data to guide clinical decision-making.

Clinical evidence for synergy between immunotherapy and radiotherapy (SITAR)

Previous preclinical and clinical trials have shown promising antitumour activity and toxicity profile when employing the 'Synergy between Immunotherapy and Radiotherapy' (SITAR) strategy. Approximately, one in seven radiation therapy studies currently recruiting is investigating SITAR. This article reviews the range of cancers known to respond to immunotherapy and publications analysing SITAR. It sets the background for work that needs to be done in future clinical trials. It also reviews the potential toxicities of immunotherapy and discusses areas where caution is required when combining treatments.

Intracranial Treatment in Melanoma Patients with Brain Metastasis Is Associated with Improved Survival in the Era of Immunotherapy and Anti-BRAF Therapy

Metastatic melanoma patients are at high risk of brain metastases (BM). Although intracranial control is a prognostic factor for survival, impact of local (intracranial) treatment (LT), surgery and/or radiotherapy (stereotactic or whole brain) in the era of novel therapies remains unknown. We evaluated BM incidence in melanoma patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) or anti-BRAF therapy and identified prognostic factors for overall survival (OS). Clinical data and treatment patterns were retrospectively collected from all patients treated for newly diagnosed locally advanced or metastatic melanoma between May 2014 and December 2017 with available BRAF mutation status and receiving systemic therapy. Prognostic factors for OS were analyzed with univariable and multivariable survival analyses. BMs occurred in 106 of 250 eligible patients (42.4%), 64 of whom received LT. Median OS in patients with BM was 7.8 months (95% CI [5.4-10.4]). In multivariable analyses, LT was significantly correlated with improved OS (HR 0.21, p < 0.01). Median OS was 17.3 months (95% CI [8.3-22.3]) versus 3.6 months (95% CI [1.4-4.8]) in patients with or without LT. LT correlates with improved OS in melanoma patients with BM in the era of ICI and anti-BRAF therapy. The use of LT should be addressed at diagnosis of BM while introducing systemic treatment.

Efficacy and Safety of Combined Brain Radiotherapy and Immunotherapy in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer With Brain Metastases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are recommended to treat advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), whereas brain radiotherapy (RT) is the mainstream therapy for patients with brain metastases (BMs). This systematic review and meta-analysis investigated whether the combination of brain RT and ICIs would generate a synergistic effect without unacceptable toxicity to treat NSCLC with BMs.

METHODS

Literature searching was performed in PubMed, Embase, Web Of Science, and The Cochrane Library up to December 20, 2020. Heterogeneity, sensitivity analysis, forest plots, and publication bias were analyzed using Stata 15.0.

RESULTS

Nineteen studies were included. In the comparison of the brain RT+ICIs arm and brain RT alone arm, the pooled effect size (ES) for overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.77; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.71-0.83; I² = 0; P < .001; n = 4) and grade 3-4 neurological adverse events (AEs) (risk ratio [RR] = 0.91; 95% CI 0.41-2.02; I² = 26.5; P = .809; n = 4) indicated that the brain RT+ICIs model had significantly better systemic efficacy and similar neurological AEs compared with brain RT alone for NSCLC. Concurrent RT+ICIs were identified as the optimal model, which achieved the best efficacy without significantly increased AEs compared with sequential RT+ICIs.

CONCLUSIONS

Combined ICIs and brain RT exhibited favorable efficacy and acceptable toxicity for NSCLC patients with BMs, among which, the concurrent model might be the optimal option. Our results could guide the design of future randomized controlled trials and clinical practice.

Evaluation of practical experiences of German speaking radiation oncologists in combining radiation therapy with checkpoint blockade

The results of this survey reveal current clinical practice in the handling of combined radioimmunotherapy with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (RT + ICI). We aim to provide a basis to open a discussion for clinical application of RT + ICI by analyzation of experts’ assessment. We conducted a survey with 24 items with a focus on side effects of RT + ICI, common practice of scheduling and handling of adverse events. After pilot testing by radiation oncology experts the link to the online survey was sent to all members of the German Society of Radiation Oncology (DEGRO). In total, 51 radiation oncologists completed the questionnaire. Pulmonary toxicity under RT + ICI with ICIs was reported most frequently. Consensus was observed for bone and soft tissue RT of the limbs in favor for no interruption of ICIs. For cranial RT half of the participants do not suspend ICIs during normofractionated radiotherapy (nfRT) or stereotactic hypofractionated RT (SRT). More participants pause ICIs for central than for peripheral thoracic region. Maintenance therapy with ICIs is mostly not interrupted prior to RT. For management of RT associated pneumonitis under durvalumab the majority of 86.3% suggest corticosteroid therapy and 76.5% would postpone the next cycle of ICI therapy. The here obtained assessment and experiences by radiation oncologists reveal a large variability in practical handling of combined RT + ICI. Until scientific evidence is available a discussion for current clinical application of RT + ICI should be triggered. Interdisciplinary consensus guidelines with practical recommendations are required.