The association between immune-related adverse events and survival outcomes in Asian patients with advanced melanoma receiving anti-PD-1 antibodies

Analysis of immune-related adverse events in gastrointestinal malignancy patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors

Immune checkpoint inhibitors are becoming an increasingly common treatment for advanced gastrointestinal cancer, but the possibility of immune-related adverse events has raised concerns. This study aimed to evaluate the risks of immune-related adverse events between patients who received immune checkpoint inhibitors and those who received chemotherapy among different types of gastrointestinal cancer. The study utilized data from the multicenter TriNetX database in the United States covering the period between 2015 and 2022. Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals were used to describe the relative hazard of immune-related adverse events based on comparing time-to-event rates. Our study revealed that the incidence of immune-related adverse events was significantly higher in patients who received immune checkpoint inhibitors and chemotherapy compared to those who received chemotherapy only in treating gastrointestinal cancer. CTLA-4 inhibitors tended to have a higher rate of immune-related adverse events compared to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. Our study found a lower mortality rate among patients who developed immune-related adverse events compared to those who did not after propensity score matching (HR, 0.661; 95% CI 0.620-0.704; p < .01). We provide important real-world data on the incidence and impact of immune-related adverse events in patients with advanced gastrointestinal cancer treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Our study's results support clinicians in making informed decisions about the potential benefits and risks of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy for patients with gastrointestinal cancer.

Immune-Related Adverse Event-Related Adrenal Insufficiency Mediates Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Efficacy in Cancer Treatment

Purpose

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have significantly improved the outcomes of patients with cancer; however, these agents may initiate immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Previous studies have demonstrated a robust correlation between disease prognosis and the occurrence of irAEs, specifically skin or endocrine irAEs. Herein, we aimed to evaluate the correlation between irAE-related adrenal insufficiency (AI) and ICI treatment efficacy.

Patients and methods

Patients diagnosed with gastrointestinal, respiratory, head and neck, urological, skin and gynecologic cancers treated with anti-programmed cell death 1 (PD-1)/anti-programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) antibody as monotherapy or combined therapy (combined with chemotherapy or targeted therapy) were divided into irAE-A (patients with irAE-related AI), irAE-B (patients with other irAEs) and non-irAE groups. Immunotherapy efficacy was assessed based on the disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Survival probabilities were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method with the log-rank test.

Results

Of the 192 patients enrolled in our study, 17 developed irAE-related AI and 83 developed other irAEs. The DCR of the irAE-A and irAE-B groups were higher than that of the non-irAE group (P<0.05). Multiple extended Cox regression analyses showed that irAE status (irAE-A vs non-irAE, P=0.008; irAE-B vs non-irAE, P=0.020), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) status (P=0.045), tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stage (P=0.000), and treatment line (P=0.002) were independent predictors of PFS. Contrarily, irAE status (irAE-A vs non-irAE, P=0.009; irAE-B vs non-irAE, P=0.013), ECOG status (P=0.007), TNM stage (P=0.035), treatment line (P=0.001) and treatment modality (P=0.008) were independent predictors for OS.

Conclusion

IrAE-related AI was significantly associated with ICI treatment efficacy in patients with cancer, which could be a potentially predictable marker. Due to the destruction of adrenal tissue by T cells with enhanced activity, AI reflects enhanced T cell activity to some extent.

Distinct changes to pancreatic volume rather than pancreatic autoantibody positivity: insights into immune checkpoint inhibitors induced diabetes mellitus

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are promising treatment options for various cancers. However, their use is associated with immune-related adverse events (irAEs), including ICI-induced diabetes mellitus (ICI-DM). This study aimed to investigate the clinical features of ICI-DM, with a particular focus on alterations to pancreatic volume.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of 2829 patients who received ICI treatment at the Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, between January 2014 and December 2021. New-onset diabetes or diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) was identified in ten patients receiving ICI therapy. Pancreatic volumes were assessed by manual segmentation of computed tomography (CT) images before and after ICI-DM diagnosis.

RESULTS

Among these ten patients, nivolumab was the most commonly used ICI (50.0%), followed by pembrolizumab (30.0%) and atezolizumab (20.0%). One patient received combination therapy with nivolumab and ipilimumab. The median age was 63.01 years (range: 40.1 - 87.8). ICI-DM developed after a median of 13.5 cycles (range: 2 - 42) of ICI treatment or 9.85 months (range:1.5 - 21.3) since ICI initiation. The initial presentation was DKA in 60.0% of patients. All patients had low or undetectable C-peptide levels (range: <0.033 - 0.133 nmol/L) and were negative for most type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM)-related autoantibodies; only one patient tested positive for glutamic acid decarboxylase antibodies. CT imaging revealed significant pancreatic atrophy, with a median pancreatic volume decrease of 19.92% (P = 0.038) from baseline and sustained significant decline at last follow-up (median - 37.14%, P = 0.012).

CONCLUSIONS

ICI-DM is often accompanied by pancreatic atrophy and approximately two-thirds of patients initially present with DKA. Although the majority of ICI-DM patients lack T1DM-related autoantibodies, identifying diminished pancreatic volumes through CT imaging provides valuable clues into the subclinical aspects of ICI-DM development, aiding in the prevention of diabetic emergencies.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Not applicable.

Genomic and tumour microenvironmental biomarkers of immune checkpoint inhibitor response in advanced Taiwanese melanoma

Objective

Genomic biomarkers predicting immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment outcomes for Asian metastatic melanoma have been rarely reported. This study presents data on next-generation sequencing (NGS) and tumour microenvironment biomarkers in 33 cases.

Methods

Thirty-three patients with advanced melanoma, who underwent ICI treatment at the Chang Gung Memorial Hospital in Taiwan, were recruited. The study evaluated clinical outcomes, including response rate, disease control rate, progression-free survival (PFS) rate and overall survival (OS) rate. Archived tissue samples from 33 cases were subjected to NGS by ACTOnco, and ACTTME was employed in 25 cases.

Results

The most prevalent driver mutations were BRAF mutations (24.2%), followed by NRAS (15.2%), KIT (12.1%), KRAS (9.1%) and NF1 (9.1%) mutations. Acral/mucosal melanomas exhibited distinct mutation patterns compared to non-acral melanomas. Tumour mutational burden estimated using ACTOnco was not associated with ICI efficacy. Notably, genetic alterations in the p53 pathway (CDKNA2 loss, MDM2 gain/amplification and TP53 mutation) accounted for 36.4% and were significantly associated with unfavourable PFS (median PFS 2.7 months vs. 3.9 months, P = 0.0394). Moreover, 26 genes were identified as differentially expressed genes that were upregulated in patients with clinical benefits compared to those without benefits. Four genes, GZMH, GZMK, AIM2 and CTLA4, were found to be associated with both PFS and OS.

Conclusion

Genetic alterations in the p53 pathway may be critical in Asian patients with melanoma undergoing ICI treatment. Further investigation is required to explore this mechanism and validate these findings.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced cutaneous melanoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of efficacy and review of characteristics

OBJECTIVES

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are one of the most promising approaches toward advanced melanoma. Here, we aimed to perform a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate the efficacy of all studied ICIs.

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive search to identify the relevant publications (PROSPERO registration ID: CRD42023470649). Then we performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of different ICIs for metastatic melanoma. We used Cochrane's tool to assess the quality of studies. The outcome measures were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and recurrence-free survival (RFS).

RESULTS

Twenty reports of RCTs entered our systematic review, 18 of which were included in our data analysis. ICIs showed improved survival compared with control group (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.57; 95% CI: 0.43-0.71; P<0.001). Using a meta-regression, we found a significant relation between patients' mean age and their OS (P<0.001, R 2  = 100.00%). Also, our analysis revealed greater HR for CTLA-4 inhibitors than PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors (HR = 0.71, 95%CI: 0.63-0.79, P<0.001 vs. HR = 0.63, 95%CI: 0.46-0.79, P<0.001). The effect sizes of different types of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors were comparable.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that ICI-based immunotherapy is associated with enhanced OS, PFS, and RFS (P < 0.001) and will assist clinicians in choosing the optimal approach toward treating metastatic melanoma.

Restricted Mean Survival Time-Can It Be a New Tool in Assessing the Survival of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors?

BACKGROUND

Lung cancer (LC) is the first and most lethal cancer in the world; identifying new methods to treat it, such as immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), is needed. ICIs treatment is very effective, but it comes bundled with a series of immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Restricted mean survival time (RMST) is an alternative tool for assessing the patients' survival when the proportional hazard assumption (PH) fails.

METHODS

We included in this analytical cross-sectional observational survey patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), treated for at least 6 months with ICIs in the first- and second-line settings. Using RMST, we estimated the overall survival (OS) of patients by dividing them into two groups. A multivariate Cox regression analysis was performed to determine the impact of the prognostic factors on OS.

RESULTS

Seventy-nine patients were included (68.4% men, mean age 63.8), and 34/79 (43%) presented irAEs. The OS RMST of the entire group was 30.91 months, with a survival median of 22 months. Thirty-two out of seventy-nine (40.5%) died before we ended our study. The OS RMST and death percentage favored the patients who presented irAEs (long-rank test, p = 0.036). The OS RMST of patients with irAEs was 35.7 months, with a number of deaths of 12/34 (35.29%), while the OS RMST of the patients without irAEs was 17 months, with a number of deaths of 20/45 (44.44%). The OS RMST by the line of treatment favored the first line of treatment. In this group, the presence of irAEs significantly impacted the survival of these patients (p = 0.0083). Moreover, patients that experienced low-grade irAEs had a better OS RMST. This result has to be cautiously regarded because of the small number of patients stratified according to the grades of irAEs. The prognostic factors for the survival were: the presence of irAEs, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status and the number of organs affected by metastasis. The risk of dying was 2.13 times higher for patients without irAEs than for the patients who presented irAEs, (CI) 95% of 1.03 to 4.39. Moreover, by increasing the ECOG performance status by one point, the risk of death increased by 2.28 times, with a CI 95% of 1.46 to 3.58, while the involvement of more metastatic organs was associated with a 1.60 times increase in the death risk, with a CI 95% of 1.09 to 2.36. Age and the type of tumor were not predictive for this analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

The RMST is a new tool that helps researchers to better address the survival in studies with ICIs treatment where the PH fails, and the long-rank test is less efficient due to the existence of the long-term responses and delayed treatment effects. Patients with irAEs have a better prognosis than those without irAEs in the first-line settings. The ECOG performance status and the number of organs affected by metastasis must be considered when selecting patients for ICIs treatment.

Features and Long-Term Outcomes of Stage IV Melanoma Patients Achieving Complete Response Under Anti-PD-1-Based Immunotherapy

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) has changed the melanoma treatment spectrum. Few studies have examined the characteristics and long-term outcomes of patients achieving complete response (CR) under ICI.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We evaluated patients with unresectable stage IV melanoma treated with first-line ICI. The characteristics of those achieving CR were compared with those not achieving CR. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed. Late-onset toxicities, response to second-line treatment, the prognostic value of clinicopathologic features, and blood markers were examined.

RESULTS

A total of 265 patients were included; 41 (15.5%) achieved CR, while 224 (84.5%) had progressive disease, stable disease, or partial response. At the therapy start, those who had CR were more likely to be older than 65 years of age (p = 0.013), have a platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio below 213 (p = 0.036), and have lower lactate dehydrogenase levels (p = 0.008) than those not achieving a CR. For those who discontinued therapy after CR, the median follow-up time after CR was 56 months (interquartile range [IQR] 52-58) and the median time from CR to therapy end was 10 months (IQR 1-17). Five-year PFS after CR was 79% and 5-year OS was 83%. Most complete responders had a normalization of S100 at the time of CR (p < 0.001). In simple Cox regression analysis, age below 77 years at CR (p = 0.04) was associated with better prognosis after CR. Eight patients received second-line ICI; disease control was seen in 63%. Late immune-related toxicities occurred in 25% of patients, most being cutaneous immune-related toxicities.

CONCLUSIONS

Response, according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria, is, until now, the most important prognostic factor, and CR is a valid surrogate marker for long-term survival in patients treated with ICI. Our results highlight the importance of investigating the optimal therapy duration in complete responders.

Immune-Checkpoint Induced Skin Toxicity Masked as Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Case Report on Mimickers of Dermatological Toxicity with PD-1 Inhibition

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are increasingly the mainstay of oncology treatment. Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) from ICI therapy differ from cytotoxic adverse events. Cutaneous irAEs are one of the most common irAEs and require careful attention to optimize the quality of life for oncology patients.

PATIENT AND METHODS

These are two cases of patients with advanced solid-tumour malignancies treated with PD-1 inhibitor therapy.

RESULTS

Both patients developed multiple pruritic hyperkeratotic lesions, which were initially diagnosed as squamous cell carcinoma from skin biopsies. The presentation as squamous cell carcinoma was atypical and, upon further pathology review, the lesions were more in keeping with a lichenoid immune reaction stemming from the immune checkpoint blockade. With the use of oral or topical steroids and immunomodulators, the lesions resolved.

CONCLUSIONS

These cases emphasize that patients on PD-1 inhibitor therapy who develop lesions resembling squamous cell carcinoma on initial pathology may require an additional pathology review to assess for immune-mediated reactions, allowing appropriate immunosuppressive therapy to be initiated.

Clinical outcomes of immune checkpoint inhibitor diabetes mellitus at a comprehensive cancer center

Introduction: Immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated diabetes mellitus (ICI-DM) is a rare adverse event. In this study, we characterize clinical outcomes of patients with ICI-DM and evaluate survival impact of this complication on melanoma patients. Research design & methods: We conducted a retrospective review of 76 patients diagnosed with ICI-DM from April 2014 to December 2020. Results: 68% of patients presented in diabetic ketoacidosis, 16% had readmissions for hyperglycemia, and hypoglycemia occurred in 70% of patients after diagnosis. Development of ICI-DM did not impact overall survival or progression-free survival in melanoma patients. Conclusion: Development of ICI-DM is associated with long-term insulin dependence and pancreatic atrophy; the use of diabetes technology in this patient population can help improve glycemic control.

Widespread vitiligo and poliosis following ipilimumab-nivolumab combination therapy

INTRODUCTION

Combined immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy has been successfully used in the treatment of several malignancies. Adverse effects with the combination therapy may be more severe than the ones seen with single immune checkpoint inhibitors.

CASE PRESENTATION

We report a unique case of a 59-year-old man of dark skin complexion who underwent treatment with intravenous ipilimumab-nivolumab every 3 weeks for metastatic malignant melanoma. After three cycles of this therapy, he developed extensive skin depigmentation that within 6 weeks, affected nearly the entire skin surface, along with progressive poliosis.

MANAGEMENT AND OUTCOME

Ipilimumab-nivolumab therapy was subsequently discontinued due to grade 3 enterocolitis requiring high-dose steroids and intravenous infliximab. About six months later, imaging studies showed a relapse of malignant melanoma. At that juncture, vitiligo affected the total body surface area, resembling albinism, along with near-total poliosis and significant photosensitivity. Pembrolizumab was tried but had to be stopped after three cycles due to the reoccurrence of grade 3 enterocolitis. Progression of malignant melanoma with new brain, lung, liver, subcutaneous, and colonic metastases led to the patient's demise.

CONCLUSION

We report a unique case of severe vitiligo and poliosis that involved total body surface area in a Caucasian man with dark complexion, resembling albinism. Further studies are warranted to evaluate the severity of dermatologic side effects with combination immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy.

Association of Immune-Related Adverse Events, Hospitalization, and Therapy Resumption With Survival Among Patients With Metastatic Melanoma Receiving Single-Agent or Combination Immunotherapy

IMPORTANCE

Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) due to immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) have been shown to be positively associated with survival. Among patients with metastatic melanoma, evidence supporting this association has been conflicting, while ipilimumab-nivolumab combination ICB has been examined only in small clinical cohorts.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the association between irAEs and survival among patients with metastatic melanoma, in particular for those receiving combination ICB.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

A retrospective cohort of 492 consecutive patients with metastatic melanoma treated with ICB at 2 tertiary and 4 regional cancer centers in Alberta, Canada, from August 1, 2013, to May 31, 2020, was observed. Patients were aged 18 years or older with metastatic melanoma agnostic to primary site, who received 1 or more doses of an anti-programmed cell death protein 1 agent as single or combination ICB. Clinically significant irAEs requiring systemic corticosteroids and/or treatment delay were captured. To minimize immortal time bias, only patients surviving 12 weeks after ICB initiation were included in survival analyses. Statistical analysis was conducted on December 10, 2021.

EXPOSURES

Development of irAEs requiring systemic corticosteroids and/or treatment delay.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was overall survival (OS), with the association of irAE development with OS assessed via Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards regression analyses. The association of hospitalization for irAEs and ICB resumption after irAE with OS was examined.

RESULTS

Among 492 patients, the median age of those with irAEs was 61.8 years (IQR, 52.9-72.1 years), and the median age of those without irAEs was 65.5 years (IQR, 56.5-76.9 years), while sex distribution was comparable (137 of 198 men [69.2%] with irAEs vs 183 of 294 men [62.2%] without irAEs). There was an association between irAEs and OS both in the overall cohort (with irAEs: median OS, 56.3 months [95% CI, 38.2 months to not evaluable] vs without irAEs: median OS, 18.5 months [95% CI, 14.4-23.2 months]; P < .001) and in the 124 patients (25.2%) receiving combination ICB (with irAEs: median OS, 56.2 months [95% CI, 52.2 months to not evaluable] vs without irAEs: median OS, 19.0 months [95% CI, 6.6 months to not evaluable]; P < .001). Hospitalization for irAE did not alter this positive association with OS compared with outpatient treatment (median OS, not evaluable [95% CI, 31.5 months to not evaluable] vs median OS, 52.2 months [95% CI, 35.2 months to not evaluable]; P = .53), while resumption of ICB was associated with longer OS than not resuming ICB (median, 56.3 months [95% CI, 40.8 months to not evaluable] vs 31.5 months [95% CI, 21.0 months to not evaluable]; P = .009). A favorable independent association of irAEs with OS was confirmed in multivariable analysis (hazard ratio for death, 0.382 [95% CI, 0.254-0.576]; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This study suggests an association between irAEs and OS for patients with metastatic melanoma, including those treated with combination ICB and those with severe irAEs requiring hospitalization. The potential benefit associated with ICB resumption after irAEs warrants further investigation.

Dermatological Autoimmune Considerations of Immune Checkpoint Therapy

The most common immune-related adverse events (irAEs) involve the skin, and several serve as predictors of response to immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy, especially in melanoma. Patients with pre-existing skin autoimmune diseases (ADs) have been excluded from ICI studies for safety concerns, yet recent research has shown that dermatological ADs can be managed without discontinuing ICI therapy. Patients with ADs respond as well or better to ICIs and can be included as candidates in clinical trials. Frequently taken during ICI therapy, steroids impair immunotherapy efficacy in certain anatomical sites of tumors but not others, including the brain. ICI efficacy can be enhanced by radiotherapy without increasing adverse events, as neoadjuvant radiotherapy is thought to sensitize tumors to ICIs. This perspective highlights clinical autoimmune considerations of ICI therapy in melanoma and discusses important areas for future exploration.

Patients with melanoma treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors who had non-thyroid endocrine and skin immune-related adverse events have better prognosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Several studies have reported an association between the occurrence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) and prognosis in patients with melanoma treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), but the results remain controversial. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the association between irAEs and survival in patients with melanoma treated with ICIs.

Methods

We searched the PubMed, Web of Science, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure databases through May 5, 2022 for clinical studies evaluating the association between irAEs and in melanoma patients treated with ICIs. Combined hazard ratios (HRs) for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated using fixed- or random-effects models based on heterogeneity.

Results

A total of 60 articles were included, with 16,520 patients. In patients with melanoma treated with ICIs, the occurrence of irAEs was significantly associated with better OS (HR, 0.58; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.51–0.66; P<0.00001) and PFS (HR, 0.61; 95%CI, 0.51–0.72; P<0.00001). Endocrine irAEs (OS, HR, 0.81; 95%CI, 0.72–0.92; P=0.001; PFS: HR, 0.84; 95%CI, 0.73–0.96, P=0.009), skin irAEs (OS, HR, 0.59; 95%CI, 0.41–0.85; P=0.004; PFS: HR, 0.43; 95%CI, 0.36–0.52; P<0.00001), vitiligo (OS, HR, 0.22; 95%CI, 0.15–0.31; P<0.00001; PFS, HR, 0.33; 95%CI, 0.25–0.44; P<0.00001), and grade 1–2 irAEs (OS, HR, 0.67; 95%CI, 0.58–0.78; P<0.00001; PFS, HR, 0.62; 95%CI, 0.51–0.76; P<0.00001) showed similar results. However, thyroid, lung, gastrointestinal, liver, and grade 3–4 irAEs were not significantly associated with OS and PFS. The occurrence of non-thyroid endocrine irAEs was significantly associated with better OS (HR, 0.22; 95%CI, 0.15–0.31; P<0.00001). In patients with melanoma treated with anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (OS, HR, 0.61; 95%CI, 0.51–0.72; P<0.00001; PFS, HR, 0.59; 95%CI, 0.47–0.74; P<0.00001), the association between irAEs and clinical benefit was clearer than in patients treated with anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (OS, HR, 0.68; 95%CI, 0.52–0.89; P=0.005; PFS, HR, 0.93; 95%CI, 0.49–1.78; P=0.83).

Conclusion

Among patients with melanoma treated with ICIs, those who developed non-thyroid endocrine irAEs and cutaneous irAEs have better prognosis. This suggests that non-thyroid endocrine irAEs and cutaneous irAEs may be a prognostic biomarker for patients with melanoma treated with ICIs.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42022338308.

Association between Adverse Events and Prognosis in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated with Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab: A Multicenter Retrospective Study

This study aimed to evaluate the correlation between adverse events (AEs) and overall survival (OS) in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma treated with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (atezo/beva). This was a multicenter study in which 130 patients were enrolled. Hypertension and skin disorders had a significant correlation with longer survival (median survival time (MST): not reached vs. 14.3 months and not reached vs. 14.8 months, p = 0.001 and p = 0.047, respectively). In contrast, liver injuries were significantly correlated with shorter survival (MST: 14.7 months vs. not reached, p = 0.036), and the median development time was 21 days. In a logistic regression analysis, fatigue ≥ grade 2, liver injury ≥ grade 3, and modified albumin–bilirubin grade 2b were identified as independent factors for discontinuation due to AEs. The OS in the no discontinuation due to AE group was significantly longer than that in the discontinuation due to AEs group (MST not reached vs. 11.2 months, p = 0.001). We concluded that the development of liver injury was a negative factor for OS and that we should be vigilant in monitoring AE during atezo/beva treatments.

Nivolumab-induced systemic lymphadenopathy occurring during treatment of malignant melanoma: a case report

Nivolumab is an anti-programmed cell death protein 1 monoclonal antibody that exhibits significant efficacy in treating melanoma and other malignancies. However, various nivolumab-induced immune-related adverse events (irAEs) have been reported, and differentiating irAEs from tumor progression is sometimes difficult. Here, we report a case of reactive lymphadenopathy occurring after treatment with nivolumab. A 56-year-old man with stage IIIC melanoma received adjuvant therapy with nivolumab after wide local excision. He developed systemic lymphadenopathy and autoimmune hemolytic anemia 1 month after receiving seven cycles of nivolumab. Pathological analysis of a cervical lymph node biopsy specimen revealed no metastatic lesion or any other malignancy, including lymphoma. Thus, the patient was diagnosed with nivolumab-induced reactive lymphadenopathy. Systemic corticosteroids were administered to reduce hemolysis, which led to the resolution of lymphadenopathy. When progressive lymphadenopathy is observed in a patient who received immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy, reactive lymphadenopathy should be carefully distinguished from progression to lymphoid metastasis, and biopsy should be performed if needed.

Absolute eosinophil count may be an optimal peripheral blood marker to identify the risk of immune-related adverse events in advanced malignant tumors treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors: a retrospective analysis

Background

This study aimed to investigate the predictive values of serum biomarkers including absolute eosinophil count (AEC), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) with respect to immune-related adverse events (irAEs) during anti-PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor treatment in patients with advanced malignant tumors.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 95 patients with advanced cancer who were treated with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors from January 1, 2017, to May 1, 2020, in our cancer center. We then analyzed associations between irAEs and anti-PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor responses and evaluated the predictive values of serum biomarkers with respect to the risk of irAEs.

Results

The incidence of irAEs was 55.8%. There were no statistically significant differences between the irAEs and no-irAEs groups in an objective response rate (ORR) or disease control rate (DCR). However, landmark analysis showed that the irAEs group had better survival after 120 days following the initiation of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor treatment, compared with the no-irAEs group. The incidences of irAEs were greater in the high-AEC and low-NLR groups than in the low-AEC and high-NLR groups. Univariate logistic analysis showed that low NLR, ECOG performance status (0–1), and high AEC were risk factors for irAEs. Multivariate logistic analysis showed that high AEC and good ECOG performance status were independent predictors for irAEs.

Conclusions

irAEs may be associated with a survival benefit. Baseline AEC is a strong predictor of irAEs in patients undergoing treatment with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors.

Mechanisms of dermatologic toxicities to immune checkpoint inhibitor cancer therapies

The discovery of immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) sparked a revolution in the era of targeted anticancer therapy. While monoclonal antibodies targeting the CTLA-4 and PD-1 axes have improved survival in patients with advanced cancers, these immunotherapies are associated with a wide spectrum of dermatologic immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Several publications have addressed the clinical and histopathologic classification of these skin-directed irAEs, their impact on antitumor immunity and survival, and the critical role of supportive oncologic dermatology in their management. Here, we review the current understanding of the mechanistic drivers of immune-related skin toxicities with a focus on inflammatory, immunobullous, melanocyte/pigment-related reactions. We detail the specific immune-based mechanisms that may underlie different cutaneous reactions. We also discuss potential mechanisms as they relate to non-cutaneous irAEs and potential overlap with cutaneous irAEs, techniques to study differences in immune-related versus de novo skin reactions, and how treatment of these adverse events impacts cancer treatment, patient quality of life, and overall survival. An improved understanding of the mechanistic basis of cutaneous irAEs will allow us to develop and utilize blood-based biomarkers that could help ultimately predict onset and/or severity of these irAEs and to implement rational mechanistic-based treatment strategies that are targeted to the irAEs while potentially avoiding abrogating anti-tumor effect of ICIs.

Immune-Related Thyroid Adverse Events Predict Response to PD-1 Blockade in Patients with Melanoma

Simple Summary

We evaluated the immune-related thyroid adverse events (irTAEs) during anti-PD-1 therapy in terms of their influence on overall survival (OS) rates in melanoma. Based on data from 249 patients with metastatic melanoma and a normal thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) at baseline, we found that during anti-PD-1 therapy, 95 patients had a TSH outside normal ranges (32 had clinical symptoms of hypothyroidism). The 3-year OS rates in patients with clinical hypothyroidism, abnormal but clinically not significant TSH, and euthyreosis were 56%, 43%, and 32%, respectively. After adjusting the Cox model for potential confounding variables, clinically significant hypothyroidism was an independent prognostic factor with HR 0.51 (95% CI 0.29–0.87).

Abstract

Antibodies against programmed cell death protein-1 or its ligand (PD-(L)1) are a standard of care in melanoma; however, this treatment may cause immune-related adverse events. The aim of this study was to evaluate the immune-related thyroid adverse events (irTAEs) during anti-PD-1 therapy and analyze their influence on the overall survival rates in melanoma. We included 249 patients with metastatic melanoma treated in our institution between 2014 and 2021; the median age was 62 years (range: 17–90); 58% were males, and 37% of patients had the BRAF mutation. We included patients with a normal TSH at baseline and followed up with measurement of TSH levels during immunotherapy. In our group, 95 patients had a TSH outside the normal range: 63 not clinically significant and 32 with clinical symptoms of hypothyroidism. The 3-year overall survival rate was related to the irTAEs of clinical hypothyroidism, abnormal clinically not significant TSH, and euthyreosis at 56%, 43%, and 32%, respectively (p = 0.002). After adjusting the Cox model for potential confounding variables, clinically significant hypothyroidism was an independent prognostic factor with HR 0.51 (95% CI 0.29–0.87). In conclusion, the patients who developed clinically significant hypothyroidism requiring replacement therapy with L-thyroxin were the group who benefitted most from anti-PD-1 treatment.

Immune-related adverse events are clinical biomarkers to predict favorable outcomes in advanced renal cell carcinoma treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors cause various immune-related adverse events. The present study examined the association between the incidence of immune-related adverse events and survival outcomes in patients treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma. In addition, we compared the effect of adverse event profiles on survival for patients receiving nivolumab plus ipilimumab.

METHODS

A total of 35 patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma who were treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab from August 2018 to August 2021 were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed. Cox proportional hazards models were used for univariate and multivariate analyses, and hazard ratio and 95% confidence intervals were calculated.

RESULTS

Of the 35 patients, 22 (62.9%) experienced immune-related adverse events. The median progression-free survival (P = 0.0012) and overall survival (P = 0.0147) were significantly longer in patients with immune-related adverse events than in those without immune-related adverse events. Multivariate analysis showed that the incidence of immune-related adverse events was an independent factor for progression-free survival (hazard ratio = 4.940, 95% confidence interval: 1.558-15.664, P = 0.0067). Skin reaction was a positive predictive immune-related adverse events for progression-free survival (hazard ratio = 9.322, 95% confidence interval: 1.954-44.475, P = 0.0051).

CONCLUSION

Patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma with immune-related adverse events had superior clinical outcomes of nivolumab plus ipilimumab treatment than those without immune-related adverse events. Skin immune-related adverse events may be effective biomarkers in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors for the treatment of melanoma

INTRODUCTION

: Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) based immunotherapy is dramatically changing the management of many types of cancers including melanoma. In this malignancy, ICIs have been shown to prolong disease and progression free survival as well as overall survival of a percentage of treated patients, becoming the cornerstone of melanoma treatment.

AREAS COVERED

: In this review, first, we will describe the mechanisms of immune checkpoint activation and inhibition, second, we will summarize the results obtained with ICIs in melanoma treatment in terms of efficacy as well as toxicity, third, we will discuss the potential mechanisms of immune escape from ICI, and lastly, we will review the potential predictive biomarkers of clinical efficacy of ICI-based immunotherapy in melanoma.

EXPERT OPINION

: ICIs represent one of the pillars of melanoma treatment. The success of ICI-based therapy is limited by the development of escape mechanisms which allow melanoma cells to avoid recognition and destruction by immune cells. These results emphasize the need of additional studies to confirm the efficacy of therapies which combine different classes of ICIs as well as ICIs with other types of therapies. Furthermore, novel and more effective predictive biomarkers are needed to better stratify melanoma patients in order to define more precisely the therapeutic algorithms.

Impact of the development of immune related adverse events in metastatic melanoma treated with PD -1 inhibitors

Some clinical trials have described improved outcomes in patients who develop immune-related adverse events (irAEs) while receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors for advanced melanoma. It is unknown if this effect would be seen in a real-world population. This is a single-center retrospective analysis of all patients receiving single-agent PD-1 inhibitor for unresectable stage III or stage IV melanoma between 2012 and 2018. The majority of patients had cutaneous melanoma and were elderly (put in median and range). Totally 33.3% were BRAF mutated and 66.7% had PD-1 inhibitor as first-line treatment for metastatic disease. Also, 22% of patients had brain metastases at presentation. Of the 87 patients included in this analysis, 48 (55%) developed at least one irAE. Dermatologic toxicities were the most common irAE. The median time to develop any irAE was 12 weeks. Only one patient died of immune-related toxicity. Overall survival in the population of patients that had an irAE was significantly greater than those that did not have any toxicity (21.1 vs. 7.5 months; P < 0.001). The development of endocrine toxicity had the strongest correlation with survival as did patient with grade 1 (NCI V.5) toxicity. The development of multiple toxicities did not correlate with survival. In patients with multiple toxicities, the type of irAE that presented initially did not impact the outcome. These findings add to the growing body of literature suggesting an association between irAEs and immune-checkpoint inhibitor efficacy while suggesting that this benefit may depend on the type of toxicity and severity.

Association between Immune Related Adverse Events and Outcome in Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Simple Summary

Patients treated with immune-checkpoint inhibitors often experience a wide range of peculiar adverse events, called immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Lately, it has been described that the presence of irAEs may be associated with better clinical response to immunotherapy. The aim of our retrospective study was to observe the onset of the most common side effects and to evaluate their potential prognostic impact in a cohort of metastatic renal cell cancer patients treated with immunotherapy. We confirmed a correlation between irAEs and progression free survival in patients with cutaneous and thyroid adverse reactions as well as in patients that experienced two or more irAEs. Thus, the development of irAEs could act as a clinical marker of efficacy in metastatic renal cell patients treated with immunotherapy.

Abstract

Background: It has been reported that the occurrence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) in oncological patients treated with immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) may be associated with favorable clinical outcome. We reported the clinical correlation between irAEs and the efficacy of ICIs in a real-world cohort of metastatic renal cell cancer (mRCC) patients. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 43 patients with mRCC who were treated with nivolumab or with nivolumab plus ipilimumab. We considered seven specific classes of irAEs including pulmonary, hepatic, gastrointestinal, cutaneous, endocrine, rheumatological, and renal manifestations. We assessed progression-free survival (PFS) of specific irAEs classes compared to the no-irAEs group. Results: Twenty-nine out of 43 patients (67.4%) experienced a total of 49 irAEs registered. The most frequent irAE was thyroid dysfunction (n = 14). The median PFS after the beginning of therapy was significantly longer in patients with thyroid dysfunction and cutaneous reactions. In multivariate analysis, thyroid dysfunction was an independent factor for favorable outcome [HR: 0.29 (95% CI 0.11–0.77) p = 0.013]. Moreover, experiencing ≥2 irAEs in the same patient correlated in multivariate analysis with better outcome compared with none/one irAE [HR: 0.33 (95% CI 0.13–0.84) p = 0.020]. Conclusions: This retrospective study suggests an association between specific irAES (thyroid dysfunction and skin reaction) and efficacy of ICIs in metastatic RCC. Notably, multiple irAEs in a single patient were associated with better tumor response.