Angiotensin blockade therapy and survival in pancreatic cancer: a population study

Relationship between pancreatic cancer resection rate and survival at population level: systematic review

BACKGROUND

Surgery combined with chemotherapy provides the best chance of survival in pancreatic cancer. This study investigated whether increasing the resection rate at a population level improves overall survival and modelled the interaction between resection rate, perioperative mortality rate, and population survival.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted on studies reporting resection rate and survival outcomes in patients with pancreatic cancer at a population level. MEDLINE, Embase and Evidence-Based Medicine Reviews were searched up to February 2024. The primary outcome was overall population-level survival. A model for 1-year survival incorporating varying resection and perioperative mortality rates was developed.

RESULTS

The search identified 3967 studies; 19 were eligible (516 789 patients). A significant association was observed between resection rate and pancreatic cancer population survival at 1 year (r2 = 0.46, P = 0.001). A weak but significant association was noted between resection rate and (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy (r2 = 0.26, P = 0.03). One-year pancreatic cancer population survival was significantly associated with chemotherapy (r2 = 0.63; P = 0.004), but the effect was weaker than for resection rate (regression slope 0.26 versus 0.94 respectively). According to the developed model, for example, increasing the resection rate from 10 to 15% and perioperative mortality rate from 2 to 3% would lead to a 1-year survival increase from 17.6% to 22.1%.

CONCLUSION

A higher resection rate at a population level was associated with improved survival of the pancreatic cancer population. While some of this benefit was linked to increasing (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy use, the effect of resection rate was stronger. Strategies to enhance the resection rate at national and regional levels should be explored. Establishing a benchmark for resection rate could support patient-centred healthcare and promote equitable access to high-quality pancreatic cancer care.

Angiotensin system inhibitors improve survival in patients undergoing pancreatic cancer resection: a meta-analysis of real-world evidence

BACKGROUND

The role of angiotensin system inhibitors (ASIs) in modifying the prognosis for patients undergoing pancreatic cancer resection is not yet definitively established. This meta-analysis endeavors to consolidate existing real-world data to provide a robust, evidence-based assessment of their impact on clinical outcomes.

METHODS

A meticulous search strategy was devised and executed across PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases to retrieve all relevant studies evaluating the prognostic impact of ASIs in patients who have undergone resection for pancreatic cancer. Studies comparing survival outcomes between ASI users and non-users were included in the meta-analysis. Publication bias was assessed using funnel plotand Egger's test. Sensitivity analysis employing the leave-one-out approach was conducted to ensure the robustness and reliability of the pooled estimate.

RESULTS

Seven studies encompassing 8,549 patients were analyzed. The utilization of ASIs was significantly associated with improved overall survival (HR: 0.78; 95%CI: 0.68-0.89) in patients undergoing pancreatic cancer resection. Sensitivity analysis further validated the consistency and stability of the pooled result.

CONCLUSION

Current clinical evidence suggests that ASIs are associated with improved prognosis in patients who have undergone pancreatic cancer resection. These findings highlight the potential of ASIs as a beneficial adjunctive therapy in the management of resected pancreatic cancer, warranting their consideration in clinical management protocols.

REGISTRATION

PROSPERO (identifier: CRD42024580624).

Impact of Statin Use on Survival in Patients With Unresectable Pancreatic cancer Receiving Gemcitabine Plus Nab-Paclitaxel: A Multicenter Retrospective Study

PURPOSE

The aim of this multicenter retrospective study was to evaluate the impact of statin use on clinical outcomes in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer (PC) receiving gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) in a large Japanese cohort.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records including data on the use of concomitant medications in patients with unresectable PC receiving GnP between January 2015 and January 2019 at 10 hospitals. Prognostic factors for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 1682 patients were included in the analysis; of which 322 patients (19%) received statins and 1360 (81%) did not receive statin. The median PFS and OS were 7.5 versus 7.3 months (P = 0.87) and 15.1 versus 14.4 months (P = 0.48) in cases with and without statin use. The use of statin was not associated with PFS (hazard ratio, 1.01; 95% confidence interval, 0.85-1.18, P = 0.93) or OS (hazard ratio, 1.05; 95% confidence interval, 0.91-1.21, P = 0.47) in the multivariable analyses. PFS and OS did not significantly differ by liposolubility of statins, either.

CONCLUSIONS

Stain use was not associated with PFS or OS in patients with unresectable PC receiving GnP.

Impact of Renin-Angiotensin System Inhibitors on Response to PD1/L1 Inhibitors in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS), traditionally associated with blood pressure and fluid regulation, also plays a role in tumorigenesis. Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors (RAASI), including angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), have been shown to improve outcomes in various malignant neoplasms. In metastatic urothelial cancer, the use of RAASI have been associated with higher rates of tumor regression in patients receiving immunotherapy (IO) with PD1/L1 inhibitors. This is thought to be due to RAASI-induced downregulation of TGF-beta, for which increased expression is a known mechanism of PD1/L1 inhibitor resistance. We hypothesized that concurrent RAASI in patients with mRCC receiving IO is associated with increased tumor regression.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with mRCC receiving IO as a first- or second-line therapy from 2016-2023 at the University of Virginia. A logistic regression model was used to evaluate the impact of concurrent RAASI on tumor regression. The primary endpoint was any regression of tumor on imaging.

RESULTS

Data were available for 128 patients with mRCC who received IO as a first- (n = 91, 71.0%) or second- (n = 37, 28.9%) line treatment. Patients who received RAASI during IO were more likely to have tumor regression compared to patients who were not on concurrent RAASI (OR 3.84 [95% CI 1.81-8.47, P =< .001). This held true regardless if patients received IO as a first-line (OR 2.83 [95% CI 1.2-6.94], P = .0173) or second-line (OR 9.5 [95% CI 1.89-73.1], P = .005) treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Our hypothesis generating study suggests that in our mRCC population, concurrent use of RAASI in patients receiving IO was associated with a significantly increased likelihood of tumor regression. These findings highlight the potential therapeutic advantage of RAASI in combination with IO for mRCC patients. Further exploration of this association is warranted in prospective studies to improve treatment outcomes for this patient population.

The Association between use of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System Inhibitors and the Risk and Mortality of Pancreatic Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic Cancer (PC) is one of the most malignant tumors and highly invasive neoplasms around the world.

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to study the relationship between the use of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors and the incidence and mortality of PC.

METHODS

The electronic search was conducted systematically until October 10, 2023. in databases, including Scopus, Web of Science (WOS), PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and Embase. The required data were extracted from the articles and were analyzed by Stata 15 using statistical tests (Chi-square and I2), Forest plots, and publication bias tests (Begg's and Egger's tests).

RESULTS

A total of four studies (2011-2019; n=314,856) investigated the relationship between RAS antagonists and PC risk. No significant associations were found between angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) (OR=0.94, 95% CI: 0.77-1.14, p=0.513), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) (OR=0.96, 95% CI: 0.84-1.09, p=0.505), or combination therapy (ARBs + ACEIs) (OR=0.97, 95% CI: 0.87-1.09, p=0.627) and PC risk. Also, nine studies (2010-2023; n=20,483) examined the association between renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors and PC mortality. Significant reductions in PC mortality were found for ARBs (OR=0.81, 95% CI: 0.66-0.98, p=0.032), ACEIs (OR=0.89, 95% CI: 0.80-0.99, p=0.038), and combination therapy (OR=0.83, 95% CI: 0.70-0.97, p=0.022). No evidence of publication bias was found in the study results.

CONCLUSION

In summary, while renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors did not appear to impact PC risk, their use was associated with lower PC mortality based on this meta-analysis of the current evidence. More rigorous and well-designed studies are required to validate and support these findings.

Impact of ACEI/ARB use on the survival of hypertensive patients with cancer: A meta‑analysis

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) are commonly used antihypertensive drugs. However, the impact that the use of ACEI and ARB drugs will have on the survival of patients with hypertension and cancer is still unclear. Therefore, the present study aimed to investigate the effects of ACEI and ARB use on the survival of patients with cancer. The Embase, PubMed and Web of Science databases were used to systematically analyze the survival of hypertensive patients with cancer treated with ACEIs or ARBs. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to evaluate the association between ACEI and ARB use and patient survival. The relationship between the survival of patients with certain types of cancer and ACEI and ARB use was evaluated using the calculated HRs. Patients with ovarian, pancreatic, prostate, hepatocellular, lung, esophageal, gastric, colon, nasopharyngeal, head and neck tumors, gallbladder and rectal cancers that used ACEI and ARB analogs had significantly increased survival times, except for patients with breast cancer (HR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.90-1.19; P<0.01) and uroepithelial carcinoma (HR, 1.15; 95% CI, 0.69-1.94; P<0.01), who had significantly decreased survival times, when compared with patients who did not use these drugs. Analysis of the relationship between the use of ACEIs or ARBs alone or in combination on the overall survival of hypertensive patients with cancer demonstrated that the use of ACEIs alone (HR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.93-1.08; P<0.01) did not have a significant effect on the survival of these patients. By contrast, the survival time was increased in hypertensive patients with cancer who used either ARBs alone (HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.84-0.94; P<0.01) or a combination of ACEIs and ARBs (HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.78-0.91; P<0.01). The present meta-analysis demonstrated the potential effects of ACEI and ARB use on the overall survival of patients with cancer. Therefore, investigation of the underlying mechanisms of action of ACEIs and ARBs, as well as the identification of specific groups of patients who may benefit from these interventions, could potentially lead to novel therapeutic options and improve the prognosis of patients with cancer in the future.

Advanced progress of the relationship between renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors and cancers

Hypertension and cancers are the most common causes of death in humans, as well as common co-diseases among elderly population. Studies have shown that hypertension is associated with carcinogenesis. The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) is a crucial regulatory system of blood pressure, fluid, and electrolyte homeostasis, which plays an essential role in the pathogenesis of hypertension, whose mechanism is relatively clear. Studies have indicated that RAAS also widely exists in cancer tissues of different systems, which can affect the risk of cancers by stimulating cancer angiogenesis, participating in cancer-related oxidative stress, and regulating cancer-related immunity. Therefore, inhibiting RAAS activity seems beneficial to decreasing the risk of cancers. As one of the most commonly used antihypertensive drugs, RAAS inhibitors have been widely used in clinical practice. However, the conclusions of clinical studies on the relationship between RAAS inhibitors and cancers are not entirely consistent, which has been widely concerned by clinicians. The latest findings suggest that while RAAS inhibitors may reduce the risk of digestive cancers, respiratory cancers, urological cancers, gynecological cancers, and skin cancers, ACEIs may increase the risk of lung cancer, endometrial cancer, basal cell carcinoma, and squamous cell carcinoma. This article comprehensively reviews animal experiments, clinical studies, and meta-analyses on the relationship between RAAS inhibitors and cancers, to provide references for related studies in the future.

Synergistic effects of calcium channel blockers and renin-angiotensin inhibitors with gemcitabine-based chemotherapy on the survival of patients with pancreatic cancer

PURPOSE

Pancreatic cancer remains a significant public health challenge, with poor long-term outcomes due to the lack of effective treatment options. Repurposing commonly used clinical drugs, such as ACE inhibitors, ARBs, CCBs, and metformin, may enhance the efficacy of chemotherapy and offer a promising therapeutic strategy for improving patient outcomes.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of concomitant treatment with ACE-Is, ARBs, CCBs, and metformin alongside gemcitabine chemotherapy in patients with pancreatic cancer was conducted. Treatment responses were evaluated, with overall survival (OS) estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Additionally, the Cox proportional hazards model was employed to assess the impact of these specific agents on patient survival.

RESULTS

4628 patients with various stages of pancreatic cancer were identified in the database between 2007 and 2016. The estimated overall survival (OS) in the analyzed group was 6.9 months (95% CI 6.4-7). The use of any of the analyzed drugs was associated with a significant improvement in mOS of 7.5 months (95% CI 6.8-7.8) vs. 6.7 months (95% CI 6.4-7.0) for patients who did not have additional treatment (p < 0.0001). ARBs, ACE-Is, CCBs, and metformin varied in their effectiveness in prolonging mOS among patients. The longest mOS of 8.9 months (95% CI 7.7-11.6) was observed in patients receiving additional therapy with ARBs, while the shortest mOS of 7.7 months (95% CI 6.5-8.9) was achieved by patients receiving metformin. In the adjusted Cox analysis, metformin was associated with a significantly weaker effect on mOS (p = 0.029). A particularly interesting trend in prolonging 5-year survival was demonstrated by ARBs and CCBs with 14.1% (95% CI 9-22%) and 14.8% (95% CI 11.1-19.6%), respectively, compared to patients not taking these drugs, who achieved a 5-year OS of 3.8% (95% CI 3.2-4.4%).

CONCLUSION

Our results demonstrate a significant positive impact of ARBs, ACE inhibitors, and CCBs on survival in patients with pancreatic cancer treated with gemcitabine. The addition of these inexpensive and relatively safe drugs in patients with additional comorbidities may represent a potential therapeutic option in this indication. However, prospective clinical trials to evaluate the optimal patient population and further studies to determine the potential impact of these agents on chemotherapy are necessary.

Identification of immune- and oxidative stress-related signature genes as potential targets for mRNA vaccines for pancreatic cancer patients

Adenocarcinoma of the pancreas (PAAD) is one of the deadliest malignant tumors, and messenger ribonucleic acid vaccines, which constitute the latest generation of vaccine technology, are expected to lead to new ideas for the treatment of pancreatic cancer. The Cancer Genome Atlas-PAAD and Genotype-Tissue Expression data were merged and analyzed. Weighted gene coexpression network analysis was used to identify gene modules associated with tumor mutational burden among the genes related to both immunity and oxidative stress. Differentially expressed immune-related oxidative stress genes were screened via univariate Cox regression analysis, and these genes were analyzed via nonnegative matrix factorization. After immune infiltration analysis, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression combined with Cox regression was used to construct the model, and the usefulness of the model was predicted based on the receiver operating characteristic curve and decision curve analysis curves after model construction. Finally, metabolic pathway enrichment was analyzed using gene set enrichment analysis combined with Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes and gene ontology biological process analyses. This model consisting of the ERAP2, mesenchymal-epithelial transition factor (MET), CXCL9, and angiotensinogen (AGT) genes can be used to help predict the prognosis of pancreatic cancer patients more accurately than existing models. ERAP2 is involved in immune activation and is important in cancer immune evasion. MET binds to hepatocyte growth factor, leading to the dimerization and phosphorylation of c-MET. This activates various signaling pathways, including MAPK and PI3K, to regulate the proliferation, invasion, and migration of cancer cells. CXCL9 overexpression is associated with a poor patient prognosis and reduces the number of CD8 + cytotoxic T lymphocytes in the PAAD tumor microenvironment. AGT is cleaved by the renin enzyme to produce angiotensin 1, and AGT-converting enzyme cleaves angiotensin 1 to produce angiotensin 2. Exposure to AGT-converting enzyme inhibitors after pancreatic cancer diagnosis is associated with improved survival. The 4 genes identified in the present study - ERAP2, MET, CXCL9, and AGT - are expected to serve as targets for messenger ribonucleic acid vaccine development and need to be further investigated in depth.

Correlation between Angiotensin Inhibitor Administration and Longer Survival in Patients Who Underwent Curative Resection for Pancreatic Cancer

PURPOSE

The microenvironment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) with extensive desmoplastic stroma contributes to aggressive cancer behavior. Angiotensin system inhibitors (ASIs) reduce stromal fibrosis and are a promising therapeutic strategy. The purpose of this study was to examine how ASIs affected the oncological results of patients who had their PDAC removed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective assessment was conducted on the clinicopathological and survival data of patients who received curative resection for PDAC at Severance Hospital between January 2012 and December 2019.

RESULTS

A total of 410 participants (228 male and 182 female), with a median follow-up period of 12.8 months, were included in this study. Patients were divided into three groups, based on ASI use and history of hypertension: group 1, normotensive and never used ASI (n=210, 51.2%); group 2, ASI non-users with hypertension (n=50, 12.2%); and group 3, ASI users with hypertension (n=150, 36.6%). The three groups did not differ significantly in terms of age, sex, kind of operation, T and N stages, or adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy. Moreover, there was no discernible difference in disease-free survival between those who used ASI and those who did not (p=0.636). The 5-year overall survival (OS) rates in groups 1, 2, and 3 were 52.6%, 32.3%, and 38.0%, respectively. However, the OS rate of ASI users was remarkably higher than that of non-users (p=0.016).

CONCLUSION

In patients with resected PDAC, ASI is linked to longer survival rates. Furthermore, for individuals with hypertension, ASI in conjunction with conventional chemotherapy may be an easy and successful treatment option.

Factors associated with longer survival among older medicare patients after diagnosis of supratentorial primary brain malignancies: a retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVES

Despite recent advances, the prognosis for primary malignant brain tumors (PMBTs) remains poor. Some commonly prescribed medications may exhibit anti-tumor properties in various cancers, and neurodegenerative diseases may activate pathways that counteract gliomagenesis. Our study is focused on determining if there is a correlation between the use of metformin, beta-blockers, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs), and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), or the presence of Parkinson's disease (PD), and the survival rates following a diagnosis of a PMBT.

METHODS

This analysis of the 100% Texas Medicare Database identified patients aged 66+ years diagnosed with a supratentorial PMBT from 2014-2017. Cox proportional hazards regression was employed to analyze survival following diagnosis and associations of survival with surgical intervention, radiation, PD diagnosis, and prescription of metformin, beta-blockers, ACEIs, or ARBs.

RESULTS

There were 1,943 patients who met study criteria, and the median age was 74 years. When medication utilization was stratified by none, pre-diagnosis only, post-diagnosis only, or both pre- and post-diagnosis (continuous), continuous utilization of metformin, beta-blockers, ACEIs, or ARBs was associated with prolonged survival compared to no utilization (hazard ratio [HR]:0.45, 95% CI:0.33-0.62; HR:0.71. 95% CI:0.59-0.86; HR:0.59, 95% CI:0.48-0.72; and HR:0.45, 95% CI:0.35-0.58 respectively). PD was also associated with longer survival (HR:0.59-0.63 across the four models).

DISCUSSION

Our study suggests that metformin, beta-blockers, ACEIs, ARBs, and comorbid PD are associated with a survival benefit among geriatric Medicare patients with supratentorial PMBTs.

Drug-repurposing by virtual and experimental screening of PFKFB3 inhibitors for pancreatic cancer therapy

Pancreatic cancer (PC) is the most frequently occurring cancer, with few effective treatments and a 5-year survival rate of only about 11%. It is characterized by stiff interstitium and pressure on blood vessels, leading to an increased glycolytic metabolism. PFKFB3 plays an important role in glycolysis, and its products (fructose-2,6-bisphosphate), which are allosteric PFK1 activators, limit the glycolytic rate. In this study, 14 PFKFB3 inhibitors were obtained by virtually screening the FDA-approved compound library. Subsequently, the in-vitro investigations confirmed that Lomitapide and Cabozantinib S-malate exhibit the excellent potential to inhibit PFKFB3. The combined administration of Lomitapide and Gemcitabine at a certain molar ratio indicated an enhanced anti-tumor effect in Orthotopic Pancreatic Cancer (OPC) models. This investigation provides a new treatment strategy for PC therapy.

IPIAD- an augmentation regimen added to standard treatment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma using already-marketed repurposed drugs irbesartan, pyrimethamine, itraconazole, azithromycin, and dapsone

This short note presents the data and rationale for adding five generic non-oncology drugs from general medical practice to gemcitabine, nab-paclitaxel, a current standard cytotoxic chemotherapy of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. The regimen, called IPIAD, uses an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) irbesartan indicated for treating hypertension, an old antimicrobial drug pyrimethamine indicated for treating toxoplasmosis or malaria, an old antifungal drug itraconazole, an old broad spectrum antibiotic azithromycin and an old antibiotic dapsone. In reviewing selected growth driving systems active in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma then comparing these with detailed data on ancillary attributes of the IPIAD drugs, one can predict clinical benefit and slowing growth of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma by this augmentation regimen.

Multitarget, multiagent PLGA nanoparticles for simultaneous tumor eradication and TME remodeling in a melanoma mouse model

Despite the fact that chemoimmunotherapy has emerged as a key component in the era of cancer immunotherapy, it is challenged by the complex tumor microenvironment (TME) that is jam-packed with cellular and non-cellular immunosuppressive components. The aim of this study was to design a nanoparticulate system capable of sufficiently accumulating in the tumor and spleen to mediate local and systemic immune responses, respectively. The study also aimed to remodel the immunosuppressive TME. For such reasons, multi-functional polylactic-co-glycolic acid (PLGA) nanoparticles (NPs) were engineered to simultaneously eradicate the cancer cells, silence the tumor-associated fibroblasts (TAFs), and re-educate the tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) using doxorubicin, losartan, and metformin, respectively. These agents were also selected for their ability to tip the balance of the splenic immune cells towards immunostimulatory phenotypes. To establish TAM and TAF cultures, normal macrophages and fibroblasts were incubated with B16F10 melanoma cell (Mel)-derived secretome. Drug-loaded PLGA NPs were prepared, characterized, and tested in the target cell types. Organ distribution of fluorescein-loaded PLGA NPs was evaluated in a mouse model of melanoma. Finally, the local and systemic effects of different combination therapy programs were portrayed. The in vitro studies showed that the drug-loaded PLGA NPs could significantly ablate the immunosuppressive nature of Mel and skew TAMs and TAFs towards more favorable phenotypes. While in vivo, PLGA NPs were proven to exhibit long blood circulation time and to localize preferentially in the tumor and the spleen. The combination of either metformin or losartan with doxorubicin was superior to the monotherapy, both locally and systemically. However, the three-agent combo produced detrimental effects in the form of compromised well-being, immune depletion, and metastasis. These findings indicate the potential of TME remodeling as means to prime the tumors for successful chemoimmunotherapy. In addition, they shed light on the importance of the careful use of combination therapies and the necessity of employing dose-reduction strategies. D-NPs doxorubicin-loaded NPs, M-NPs metformin-loaded NPs, L-NPs losartan-loaded NPs, TAMs tumor-associated macrophages, TAFs tumor-associated fibroblasts, PD-L1 programmed death ligand 1, TNF-α tumor necrosis factor alpha, TGF-β transforming growth factor beta, CD206/40/86 cluster of differentiation 206/40/86, α-SMA alpha-smooth muscle actin, MMPs matrix metalloproteases.

Clinically impactful metabolic subtypes of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC)

Background: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a lethal disease characterized by a diverse tumor microenvironment. The heterogeneous cellular composition of PDAC makes it challenging to study molecular features of tumor cells using extracts from bulk tumor. The metabolic features in tumor cells from clinical samples are poorly understood, and their impact on clinical outcomes are unknown. Our objective was to identify the metabolic features in the tumor compartment that are most clinically impactful. Methods: A computational deconvolution approach using the DeMixT algorithm was applied to bulk RNASeq data from The Cancer Genome Atlas to determine the proportion of each gene's expression that was attributable to the tumor compartment. A machine learning algorithm designed to identify features most closely associated with survival outcomes was used to identify the most clinically impactful metabolic genes. Results: Two metabolic subtypes (M1 and M2) were identified, based on the pattern of expression of the 26 most important metabolic genes. The M2 phenotype had a significantly worse survival, which was replicated in three external PDAC cohorts. This PDAC subtype was characterized by net glycogen catabolism, accelerated glycolysis, and increased proliferation and cellular migration. Single cell data demonstrated substantial intercellular heterogeneity in the metabolic features that typified this aggressive phenotype. Conclusion: By focusing on features within the tumor compartment, two novel and clinically impactful metabolic subtypes of PDAC were identified. Our study emphasizes the challenges of defining tumor phenotypes in the face of the significant intratumoral heterogeneity that typifies PDAC. Further studies are required to understand the microenvironmental factors that drive the appearance of the metabolic features characteristic of the aggressive M2 PDAC phenotype.

The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) signaling pathways and cancer: foes versus allies

The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS), is an old system with new fundamental roles in cancer biology which influences cell growth, migration, death, and metastasis. RAAS signaling enhances cell proliferation in malignancy directly and indirectly by affecting tumor cells and modulating angiogenesis. Cancer development may be influenced by the balance between the ACE/Ang II/AT1R and the ACE2/Ang 1-7/Mas receptor pathways. The interactions between Ang II/AT1R and Ang I/AT2R as well as Ang1-7/Mas and alamandine/MrgD receptors in the RAAS pathway can significantly impact the development of cancer. Ang I/AT2R, Ang1-7/Mas, and alamandine/MrgD interactions can have anticancer effects while Ang II/AT1R interactions can be involved in the development of cancer. Evidence suggests that inhibitors of the RAAS, which are conventionally used to treat cardiovascular diseases, may be beneficial in cancer therapies.Herein, we aim to provide a thorough description of the elements of RAAS and their molecular play in cancer. Alongside this, the role of RAAS components in sex-dependent cancers as well as GI cancers will be discussed with the hope of enlightening new venues for adjuvant cancer treatment.

Induced Vascular Normalization-Can One Force Tumors to Surrender to a Better Microenvironment?

Immunotherapy has changed the way many cancers are being treated. Researchers in the field of immunotherapy and tumor immunology are investigating similar questions: How can the positive benefits achieved with immunotherapies be enhanced? Can this be achieved through combinations with other agents and if so, which ones? In our view, there is an urgent need to improve immunotherapy to make further gains in the overall survival for those patients that should benefit from immunotherapy. While numerous different approaches are being considered, our team believes that drug delivery methods along with appropriately selected small-molecule drugs and drug candidates could help reach the goal of doubling the overall survival rate that is seen in some patients that are given immunotherapeutics. This review article is prepared to address how immunotherapies should be combined with a second treatment using an approach that could realize therapeutic gains 10 years from now. For context, an overview of immunotherapy and cancer angiogenesis is provided. The major targets in angiogenesis that have modulatory effects on the tumor microenvironment and immune cells are highlighted. A combination approach that, for us, has the greatest potential for success involves treatments that will normalize the tumor's blood vessel structure and alter the immune microenvironment to support the action of immunotherapeutics. So, this is reviewed as well. Our focus is to provide an insight into some strategies that will engender vascular normalization that may be better than previously described approaches. The potential for drug delivery systems to promote tumor blood vessel normalization is considered.

Survival Analysis of 1140 Patients with Biliary Cancer and Benefit from Concurrent Renin-Angiotensin Antagonists, Statins, or Aspirin with Systemic Therapy

BACKGROUND

Patients with advanced biliary tract cancers (BTCs) have poor prognoses and limited therapeutic options. Renin-angiotensin antagonists (ACE-I/ARBs), statins, and aspirin may have potential anti-tumorigenic effects and decrease mortality per retrospective analyses in some solid tumors.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of ACE-Is/ARBs, statins, and/or aspirin concurrent to first-line systemic therapy in patients with advanced or metastatic BTC.

METHODS

Adult patients at University of Michigan with pathologic confirmation of BTC between January 2010 and December 2020 were included in this retrospective analysis.

RESULTS

Of 1140 patients who met eligibility, a total of 509 patients received one or more concomitant medication(s) of interest in conjunction with systemic therapy for advanced cancer. In the total cohort, the overall survival for locally advanced patients (N = 305) was 16.3 months (95% CI: 12.1-18.6), and metastatic patients (N = 512) 8.6 months (95% CI: 7.6-9.5); P < .0001. Within this concomitant medication cohort, patients with locally advanced stage (n = 132) experienced significantly longer progression-free survival (9.8 vs 4.5; P < 0.0001), and overall survival (17.4 vs 10.6; P < 0.0001) than those with metastatic (n = 297) cancer, respectively. Patients who received ACE-Is/ARBs, statins, and/or aspirin (n = 245) versus not (n = 264) concurrent with systemic anti-cancer therapy did not experience improved progression-free (5.5 vs 5.5 months; hazard ratio (HR) 1.1; P = 0.51), or overall survival (12.3 vs 12.6 months; HR 1.1; P = 0.18), respectively.

CONCLUSION

In contrast to prior studies, no progression free or overall survival benefit in patients with advanced BTC from concurrent use of ACE-I/ARBs, statin, and/or aspirin with systemic therapy was observed when assessed by BTC subtype or specific systemic therapy regimen.

The use of angiotensin system inhibitors correlates with longer survival in resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients

BACKGROUND

Activities and inhibition of the Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System (RAAS) may affect the survival of resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients METHOD: A single-institution retrospective analysis of resected PDAC patients between 2010 and 2019. To estimate the effect of angiotensin system inhibitors (ASIs) on patient survival, we performed Kaplan Meier analysis, Cox Proportional Hazards model, Propensity Score Matching (PSM), and inverse probability weighting (IPW) analysis.

RESULTS

742 patients were included in the analysis. The average age was 67.0 years, with a median follow-up of 24.1 months. The use of ASI was associated with significantly longer overall survival in univariate (p = 0.004) and multivariable (HR = 0.70 [0.56-0.88],p = 0.003) adjusted analysis. In a propensity score-matched cohort of 400 patients, ASI use was again associated with longer overall survival (p = 0.039). Lastly, inverse probability weighting (IPW) analysis suggested that the use of ASI was associated with an average treatment effect on the treated (ATT) of HR = 0.68 [0.53-0.86],p = 0.002) for overall survival.

CONCLUSION

In this single-institution retrospective study focusing on resected PDAC patients, the use of ASI was associated with longer overall survival in multiple statistical models. Prospective clinical trials are needed before routine clinical implementation of ASI as an adjuvant to existing therapy can be recommended.

Cardiovascular Disease as a Consequence or a Cause of Cancer: Potential Role of Extracellular Vesicles

Both cardiovascular disease and cancer continue to be causes of morbidity and mortality all over the world. Preventing and treating heart disease in patients undergoing cancer treatment remain an important and ongoing challenge for improving the lives of cancer patients, but also for their survival. Despite ongoing efforts to improve patient survival, minimal advances have been made in the early detection of cardiovascular disease in patients suffering from cancer. Understanding the communication between cancer and cardiovascular disease can be based on a deeper knowledge of the molecular mechanisms that define the profile of the bilateral network and establish disease-specific biomarkers and therapeutic targets. The role of exosomes, microvesicles, and apoptotic bodies, together defined as extracellular vesicles (EVs), in cross talk between cardiovascular disease and cancer is in an incipient form of research. Here, we will discuss the preclinical evidence on the bilateral connection between cancer and cardiovascular disease (especially early cardiac changes) through some specific mediators such as EVs. Investigating EV-based biomarkers and therapies may uncover the responsible mechanisms, detect the early stages of cardiovascular damage and elucidate novel therapeutic approaches. The ultimate goal is to reduce the burden of cardiovascular diseases by improving the standard of care in oncological patients treated with anticancer drugs or radiotherapy.

Do antihypertensive drugs really have antitumor effects? Baseline differences in hypertensive and non-hypertensive patients with advanced pancreatic cancer

Although the antitumor effects of antihypertensive drugs for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer (APC) have been investigated, their efficacy remains unclear. Previous studies suggest that hypertensive (HT) patients with APC are significantly older than non-HT patients with APC, and that other major baseline differences in patient characteristics which may affect prognosis exist between HT and non-HT patients. It is also possible that antihypertensive drugs lack antitumor activity. Therefore, we herein retrospectively investigated the baseline differences between HT and non-HT patients with APC. From January 2015 to April 2020, 56 patients with APC received nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine as first-line chemotherapy at Higashiosaka City Medical Center (Higashiosaka, Japan). Of these 56 patients, 30 were diagnosed with hypertension (HT group); the remaining 26 did not have hypertension (non-HT group). Differences between the two groups were compared and prognostic factors were evaluated. Patients in the HT group had significantly less sarcopenia, a significantly larger body mass index, were significantly older, and significantly more likely to have a regular doctor and primary site in the body and tail of the pancreas than those in the non-HT group. Although no significant difference was found in the treatment response, patients in the HT group were significantly more likely to move to second-line chemotherapy than those in the non-HT group. Survival curves showed that median overall survival (OS) in the HT group was significantly longer (10.5 months) than in the non-HT group (6.8 months, P = .04). Multivariate analysis did not identify the use of antihypertensive drugs as an independent prognostic factor of OS. We identified key baseline differences in the characteristics of APC patients with and without HT, suggesting that major selection bias could occur when investigating the efficacy of antihypertensive drugs in all populations. Therefore, it is possible that antihypertensive drugs lack antitumor activity. To determine the true efficacy of antihypertensive drugs for APC, HT, and non-HT patients in another population should be investigated, or a prospective, randomized, controlled trial conducted that is stratified by HT or non-HT status.

Impact of the tumor immune microenvironment on the outcome of pancreatic cancer: a retrospective study based on clinical pathological analysis

BACKGROUND

The cancerous microenvironment, characterized by the infiltration of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, play a critical role in regulating the progression of cancer and treating efficiency of immunotherapy. However, the distribution of these cells and their associated cytokines in the tumor microenvironment of pancreatic cancer (PC) are not yet fully understood. Our study aims to analyze the contents of CD4+IL-17+ and CD8+ T cells in PC and their relationship with the clinicopathological features and survival outcomes of patients.

METHODS

PC tissues and adjacent tissues were retrospectively collected from 40 patients in our hospital. The expression of CD4, IL-17, and CD8 in histological samples was measured by immunohistochemistry. The correlation between CD4, IL-17, and CD8 expression and clinical characteristics was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. The risk factors affecting the outcome of PC were examined by the Cox proportional hazards model, then a nomogram predicting the survival of PC using these risk factors was established.

RESULTS

The content of CD4+IL-17+ T cells in PC tissues was significantly higher than that in adjacent normal tissues, while the number of CD8+ T cells was significantly lower than that in adjacent normal tissues (P<0.01). CD4+ T cells in PC tissues was significantly associated with TNM stage and lymph node metastasis (P<0.05). IL-17 and CD8 were significantly associated with histological grade, TNM stage, local infiltration, and lymph node metastasis (P<0.05). The median survival times (MSTs) of CD4 positive and negative patients were 13.2 and 21.4 months, respectively. The MSTs of IL-17 positive and negative patients were 10.4 and 24.8 months, respectively. The MSTs were 21.9 and 11.8 months for CD8 positive and negative patients, respectively (P<0.05). The Cox regression model demonstrated that TNM staging, lymph node metastasis, and CD4+IL-17+ and CD8+ T cells affected PC prognosis (P<0.05). The nomogram showed that the survival probability was reduced in patients with TNM stage III to IV, lymph node metastasis, high CD4+IL-17+ level, and low CD8+ expression.

CONCLUSIONS

CD4+IL-17+ and CD8+ T cells in PC tissues are associated with TNM staging, lymph node metastasis, and MST, and can be used as new prognostic indicators for PC.