The value of preoperative sentinel lymph node contrast-enhanced ultrasound for breast cancer: a large, multicenter trial

Combining Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound with Methylene Blue for Detection of Sentinel Lymph Nodes in Early Breast Cancer

Aims/Background Sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) are an important prognostic factor for breast cancer patients, but traditional axillary lymph node dissection methods have many complications, while sentinel lymph node biopsy has been developed as a better method. This study aimed to evaluate the efficiency of combining contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) with methylene blue for identifying SLNs in early-stage breast cancer patients. Methods This retrospective study included clinical data from 163 female patients with lymph node-negative and T1-2 early breast cancer admitted to China-Japan Friendship Hospital between August 2022 and November 2023. All patients received a periareolar injection of SonoVue followed by ultrasonography to identify SLNs. The methylene blue was used to detect SLNs during the surgery, and the patients underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy. We compared the methylene blue method with combined CEUS and methylene blue to identify the number of SLNs per patient. Furthermore, these two methods were compared to determine the number of SLNs and the number of SLNs positive in 34 SLNs positive patients. Results This study included 163 patients with tumor (T)1-2 node (N)0-3 metastasis (M)0. The identification rate of SLNs was 100% for CEUS. We detected 376 SLNs using a combined CEUS and methylene blue method, with a median of 2 (1, 5). Furthermore, methylene blue identified 627 SLNs, with a median of 3 (1, 12). However, CEUS detected a significantly lower number of SLNs than those identified by methylene blue (p < 0.001). Additionally, metastasis frequency was substantially higher for the combined CEUS and methylene blue method (66.3%, 53/80) compared to methylene blue approach alone (39.5%, 58/147) (p < 0.001). Conclusion Combining CEUS with methylene blue is expected to improve the accuracy of axillary staging in breast cancer patients while reducing surgical trauma and postoperative complications.

The Current Role of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) in the Diagnosis and Staging of Bladder Cancer: A Review of the Available Literature

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is an advanced imaging technique that integrates conventional US with the intravenous injection of specific US contrast agents (UCAs), combining the non-invasiveness of US with the higher accuracy of contrast-enhanced imaging. In contrast with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT) and cystoscopy, CEUS has few contraindications, and UCAs are non-nephrotoxic agents that can be safely used in patients with kidney failure. CEUS is a well-established method for the detection of liver lesions and for echocardiography, and its indications are expanding. The updated 2018 WFUMB-EFSUMB guidelines have added the urinary bladder under non-hepatic applications of CEUS. The technique is able to distinguish between benign tissue, such as clots or hematoma, and malignant lesions by perfusing the mass with contrast agent. Thanks to the different perfusion rates of the various layers of the bladder wall, CEUS is also able to predict tumor invasion depth and stage. Despite that, current urological guidelines do not include CEUS as a plausible imaging technique for bladder urothelial carcinoma. The main reason for this omission might be the presence of scarce randomized evidence and the absence of large validated series. In this review, we describe the rationale behind the use of CEUS in bladder cancer and the added value of this imaging technique in the detection and staging of bladder lesions. In addition, we researched the available literature on the topic and then described the results of randomized clinical trials and a meta-analysis investigating the accuracy of CEUS in bladder cancer diagnosis and staging. The reported studies show that CEUS is a highly accurate diagnostic and staging tool for BC, reaching levels of specificity and sensitivity in differentiating between Ta-T1, or low-grade BC, and T2, or high-grade BC, that are comparable to those shown by the reference standard methods. Nonetheless, several limitations were found and are highlighted in this review. The aim of this study is to further validate and promote the use of CEUS as a quick, economic and effective diagnostic tool for this high-impact disease.

Using four-point subcutaneous injection of lymphatic contrast-enhanced ultrasound to diagnose lymphedema of lower extremity

Background

The diagnosis of lymphedema primarily relies on the clinical symptoms, signs, medical history and imaging. Objective lymphatic imaging helps improving the diagnosis of lymphedema. This study aimed to develop an effective imaging tool to diagnose lymphedema.

Methods

This is a single-center retrospective study. From September 2022 to November 2023, we enrolled thirty-two patients, involving 40 lower extremities who underwent lymphatic contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) following a subcutaneous injection of contrast agent at four points in the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University. Cohen's kappa value, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy were calculated. Lymphoscintigraphy was the reference standard.

Results

Successful lymphatic-CEUS detection was defined as the situation that lymphatic drainage of medial or lateral lower limbs were observed. The successful detection rate was 100% (40 of 40). The diagnosis of lymphedema was based on the presence of either medial or lateral lymphatic obstructions, or subcutaneous lymphatic enhancement. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy for diagnosing lymphedema by lymphatic-CEUS were as follows: 91.2% (31 of 34), 100% (6 of 6), 100% (31 of 31), 66.7% (6 of 9) and 92.5% (37 of 40), respectively. The Cohen's Kappa value was 0.756. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for the subcutaneous injection of four-point lymphatic-CEUS was 0.956.

Conclusions

This study put forward a novel four-point lymphatic-CEUS method to detect the functions of the lymphatics of lower extremities and established a lymphatic-CEUS standard for diagnosing lymphedema of lower extremities. Four-point lymphatic-CEUS is a considerable option for diagnosing lymphedema of lower extremities.

Multimodal ultrasound imaging: a method to improve the accuracy of sentinel lymph node diagnosis in breast cancer

Aim

This study assessed the utility of multimodal ultrasound in enhancing the accuracy of breast cancer sentinel lymph node (SLN) assessment and compared it with single-modality ultrasound.

Methods

Preoperative examinations, including two-dimensional ultrasound (2D US), intradermal contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), intravenous CEUS, shear-wave elastography (SWE), and surface localization, were conducted on 86 SLNs from breast cancer patients. The diagnostic performance of single and multimodal approaches for detecting metastatic SLNs was compared to postoperative pathological results.

Results

Among the 86 SLNs, 29 were pathologically diagnosed as metastatic, and 57 as non-metastatic. Single-modality ultrasounds had AUC values of 0.826 (intradermal CEUS), 0.705 (intravenous CEUS), 0.678 (2D US), and 0.677 (SWE), respectively. Intradermal CEUS significantly outperformed the other methods (p<0.05), while the remaining three methods had no statistically significant differences (p>0.05). Multimodal ultrasound, combining intradermal CEUS, intravenous CEUS, 2D US, and SWE, achieved an AUC of 0.893, with 86.21% sensitivity and 84.21% specificity. The DeLong test confirmed that multimodal ultrasound was significantly better than the four single-modal ultrasound methods (p<0.05). Decision curve analysis and clinical impact curves demonstrated the superior performance of multimodal ultrasound in identifying high-risk SLN patients.

Conclusion

Multimodal ultrasound improves breast cancer SLN identification and diagnostic accuracy.

The Value of Percutaneous Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in Sentinel Lymph Node Identification, Metastatic Status and Burden Diagnosis in Early Breast Cancer

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the value of percutaneous contrast-enhanced ultrasound (PCEUS) in the identification and characterization of sentinel lymph node (SLN).

METHODS

A total of 102 breast cancer patients were collected and underwent preoperative PCEUS, which was used to identify SLN and lymphatic drainage. SLNs were classified into 4 enhancement patterns, including 6 subtypes: homogeneous (I), featured inhomogeneous (II) including inhomogeneous hypoenhancement (IIa) and annular or semi-annular enhancement (IIb), focal filling defect (III) including filling defect area < 50% (IIIa) and filling defect area ≥ 50% (IIIb), and no enhancement (IV). The enhancement patterns of SLNs were compared with the final pathological diagnosis.

RESULTS

The identification rate of SLNs using PCEUS was 100% (102/102); the rate of identification of LCs was 100% (102/102), and the coincidence rate was 98.0% (100/102). Four lymphatic drainage patterns (LDPs) including 5 subtypes were found: single LC/single SLN(74.5%), multiple LCs/ single SLN (13.7%) including 2 subtypes:2 LCs/1 SLN and 3 LCs/1 SLN, single LC/multiple SLNs (7.8%), and multiple LCs/multiple SLNs (3.9%). A total of 86.3% (44/51) of patients without axillary metastasis could be safely selected for types I, IIa, and IIb, while the axillary metastasis rates of types III and IV were 74.4% and 87.5%, respectively (P < .001). Compared with grayscale US, the PCEUS significant improvement in diagnosing metastatic SLNs (.794 versus .579, P < .001). For the SLN metastatic burden, Types I, IIa, IIb, and IIIa had ≤2 SLNs metastases, with a pathological coincidence rate of (64/67, 95.5%), and types IIIb and IV had >2 SLNs metastases, with a pathological coincidence rate of (25/35, 71.4%) (P < .001). The AUC of PCEUS for the diagnosis of SLN metastatic status and burden was .794 and .879, respectively (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

PCEUS has a high identification rate for SLN and has good potential for diagnosing SLN metastatic status and burden by enhancement patterns.

Advantages of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the localization and diagnostics of sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer

Sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) are the first station of lymph nodes that extend from the breast tumor to the axillary lymphatic drainage. The pathological status of these LNs can predict that of the entire axillary lymph node. Therefore, the accurate identification of SLNs is necessary for sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) to replace axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). The quality of life and prognosis of breast cancer patients are related to proper surgical treatment after the precise identification of SLNs. Some of the SLN tracers that have been identified include radioisotope, nano-carbon, indocyanine green (ICG), and methylene blue (MB). However, these tracers have certain limitations, such as pigmentation, radiation dangers, and the requirement for costly detection equipment. Ultrasound contrast agents (UCAs) have good specificity and sensitivity, and thus can compensate for some shortcomings of the mentioned tracers. This technique is also being applied to SLNB in patients with breast cancer, and can even provide an initial judgment on SLN status. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) has the advantages of high distinguishability, simple operation, no radiation harm, low cost, and accurate localization; therefore, it is expected to replace the traditional biopsy methods. In addition, it can significantly enhance the accuracy of SLN localization and shorten the operation time.

Lymph node metastases in breast cancer: Mechanisms and molecular imaging

Breast cancer is the most common malignant disease of women in the world. Breast cancer often metastasizes to axillary lymph nodes. Accurate assessment of the status of axillary lymph nodes is crucial to the staging and treatment of breast cancer. None of the methods used clinically for preoperative noninvasive examination of axillary lymph nodes can accurately identify cancer cells from a molecular level. In recent years, with the in-depth study of lymph node metastases, the mechanisms and molecular imaging of lymph node metastases in breast cancer have been reported. In this review, we highlight the new progress in the study of the main mechanisms of lymph node metastases in breast cancer. In addition, we analyze the advantages and disadvantages of traditional preoperative axillary lymph node imaging methods for breast cancer, and list molecular imaging methods that can accurately identify breast cancer cells in lymph nodes.