Eiology and prognosis of canalicular laceration repair using canalicular anastomosis combined with bicanalicular stent intubation

Pediatric Canalicular Lacerations: Epidemiology and Surgical Outcomes

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to report the epidemiology and surgical outcomes of canalicular lacerations in the pediatric age group.

METHODS

All pediatric patients who underwent repair of canalicular lacerations of any cause were included in this study. Age, sex, mechanism of trauma, and type of stent used were recorded.

RESULTS

The study group consisted of 47 patients with a median age of 6.4 years (22 mo-17 y). Thirty of the patients were male (63.8%). The lower canaliculus was affected in 76.6% (n=36), the upper canaliculus in 40.4% (n=19), and both canaliculi in 17% (n=8). The most common cause of canalicular laceration was sharp objects (n=33, 70.2%).

CONCLUSION

Canalicular laceration most commonly affects boys and especially involves the lower canaliculus. There was no difference in functional success between monocanalicular and bicanalicular stents. Prevention of canalicular lacerations should be the main focus.

Canalicular laceration repair using a novel bicanalicular silicone stent versus traditional bicanalicular stent with nasal fixation

PURPOSE

To compare the clinical effects of two types of lacrimal stents in the repair of canalicular lacerations.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients with canalicular lacerations between January 2017 and December 2022. The canalicular reconstruction was performed using either the Runshi-RS bicanalicular silicone stent or the traditional bicanalicular silicone stent with nasal fixation, under a surgical microscope. The stent was placed for 3 months, and patients were followed up for more than 3 months after extubation. The anatomical and functional success rates were compared between the two groups. Anatomical success was assessed through diagnostic probing and irrigation of lacrimal passage, while functional success was determined by the patient's subjective symptoms of epiphora.

RESULTS

The study included 315 patients (315 eyes) undergoing canalicular laceration repair. The Runshi-RS stent was utilized in 147 patients (46.7%), while the traditional stent with nasal fixation was employed in 168 patients (53.3%). The anatomical success rates (99.3% vs 98.8%, P = 0.642) and functional success rates (87.2% vs 88.1%, P = 0.926) were similar between the RS group and the traditional stent group. Postoperative complications were fewer (4.1% vs 10.1%, P = 0.04) and the operation time was shorter (67.1 ± 35.3 min vs 86.1 ± 43.4 min, P < 0.001) in the RS group.

CONCLUSION

The Runshi-RS tube demonstrates favorable surgical outcomes for the repair of canalicular lacerations. Compared to the traditional stent with nasal fixation, the RS stent allows for shorter operation times and fewer postoperative complications in the repair of canalicular lacerations.

A case series study of lacrimal canalicular laceration repair with the bi-canalicular stent

BACKGROUND

Lacrimal canalicular laceration can be caused by trauma on the ocular adnexa, such as penetrating or blunt injuries, accounting for approximately 16% of eyelid lacerations and 20% of eye traumas. Historically, canalicular anastomosis combined with bi-canalicular or mono-canalicular stent intubation has been used for canalicular laceration repair. In this study, we analyzed the epidemiological characteristics of lacrimal canalicular laceration and evaluate the clinical outcomes of repair using the bi-canalicular stent in central China. It aims to provide a reference for clinical work.

METHODS

This is a review of 338 patients (338 eyes) with eyelid lacrimal canaliculus laceration undergoing reparative bi-canalicular stent intubation from January 1st 2017 to December 30th 2020. The analyzed data included demographics, the place of occurrence of the trauma, the mechanism of injury, additional injury, and surgical outcomes at follow-up. The outcomes included anatomic success, functional success, and complications.

RESULTS

The average age was 39.6±20.0 years (1 to 88 years). Of all the 338 patients, 254 (75.15%) patients were men. Upper and lower canalicular lacerations were seen in 68 (20.12%) and 256 (75.74%) patients, respectively. Also, 14 patients (4.14%) presented with both upper and lower canalicular lacerations. Most injuries occurred on the streets (146, 43.20%), followed by the home in 111 (32.84%) patients. Traffic accidents were the leading cause of injury (127, 37.57%), including 72 (21.30%) cases of electric bike-associated accidents, followed by fall-related trauma in 65 (19.23%) cases. During the follow-up, there were 6 (1.78%) patients with eyelid ectropion and 9 (2.66%) patients with stent extrusion and loss due to eye rubbing and pulling the sutures out. At the end of follow-up, the anatomical success rate was 95.86% and the functional success rate was 89.64%.

CONCLUSIONS

Electric bike-associated accidents occurring on the streets is the current leading cause of injury in central China. Lacrimal canalicular laceration repair with a bi-canalicular stent offers an effective surgical therapeutic strategy for traumatic canalicular lacerations. In addition, avoiding traffic accidents is also one way prevent lacrimal canalicular laceration.

Bicanalicular Annular Stent Compared with Bicanalicular Nasal Intubation in Management of Traumatic Lower Canalicular Laceration

Purpose

To report the functional and anatomical results of bicanalicular annular stent compared to bicanalicular nasal intubation in the management of traumatic lower canalicular laceration.

Patients and Methods

A retrospective comparative, non-randomized interventional study. The study included consecutive patients suffering from traumatic lower canalicular laceration attended to ophthalmology department causality at Al Azhar University hospital Damietta branch, between December 2018 and August 2020.

Results

The study recruited eighty-five eyes of eighty-five patients admitted for treatment of traumatic lower canalicular laceration. In thirty-three patients, canalicular integrity was restored by bicanalicular annular stent (group 1) and in twenty five patients by bicanalicular lacrimal intubation (group 2). The affected patients were predominantly males (78.8% in the first group and 80% in the second group). Etiology of trauma was due to occupational hazards; 48.5% in the first group and 36% in the second group. Anatomical success in the first group was 93.9%, and 92% in the second group. Canalicular patency was achieved in 90.9% in the first group and in 80% in the second group.

Conclusion

There was no statistically significant difference between bicanalicular annular stent and bicanalicular nasal intubation regarding both anatomical and functional success. Both techniques represent a successful alternative to monocanalicular stent.

Periorbital Soft Tissue Trauma

Eyelid trauma occurs across a broad spectrum of pathology, ranging from simple periorbital lacerations to severe, vision-threatening injuries requiring expert oculoplastic consultation. Any injury, no matter how benign, is also inherently cosmetically sensitive, further adding to the reconstructive challenge. In this review, we discuss the anatomy of the eyelid and develop an understanding of evaluating for signs of more serious, potentially occult, trauma. A framework is developed for approaching the patient with periorbital trauma to assess for injury and triage necessary treatments. Damage to the lacrimal drainage system, which can be particularly difficult to detect and repair, is specifically emphasized and explored.

Risk factors for persistent epiphora following successful canalicular laceration repair

AIM

To identify the risk factors of epiphora in patients with anatomical patency after surgical repair of canalicular laceration.

METHODS

This retrospective case series included 178 cases of canalicular laceration repair from 2005 to 2012. Demographic data collected from each patient included age, sex, type of injury, distance from the distal lacerated end of the canaliculus to the punctum, the severity score for the structural abnormity of the medial canthus, the duration of stent placement, and the timing of surgery. The risk factors for epiphora were evaluated using Logistic regression models.

RESULTS

Among the 178 cases, 45 (25.3%) with lacrimal patency after irrigation had symptomatic epiphora at the final follow-up. Patients' sex, age, type of injury, duration of stent placement, timing of surgery, and concurrent trauma were not found to be significantly associated with symptomatic epiphora after surgical repair of the lacerated canaliculus (P>0.05). A distance of more than 5 mm from the distal cut end to the punctum was closely and significantly associated with symptomatic epiphora after surgical repair of the lacerated canaliculus (P<0.01). Symptomatic epiphora was significantly more frequent in patients with higher severity scores for structural abnormities of the medial canthus (P<0.01).

CONCLUSION

Our results indicate that the risk factors for postoperative symptomatic epiphora include a further distance between the distal cut end and the lacrimal punctum and a higher severity score for structural abnormities of the medial canthus. These findings could be used to prognosticate postoperative symptomatic epiphora.