1
|
Flanagan JPM, Fog LS, Astrahan MA, Talbot LJ, McKay D, Phillips C, McKenzie JD, O'Day R. Apical dose versus volume dose of Ruthenium-106 brachytherapy for uveal melanoma. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY 2024:S0008-4182(24)00074-7. [PMID: 38582499 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjo.2024.03.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2023] [Revised: 02/09/2024] [Accepted: 03/12/2024] [Indexed: 04/08/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Ruthenium-106 brachytherapy is commonly used to treat uveal melanomas. Most centres prescribe a radiation dose to the tumour apex that is calculated with the tumour located in the centre of the plaque. Recent work suggests that D99%-the minimum radiation dose delivered to 99% of tumour volume-may be a better predictor of tumour control than apex dose. Both dosing regimens may be affected by tumour and treatment variables differently. We explored the effect of differences in these variables on volume and apex dose using a 3-dimensional planning model. METHODS The time required to deliver 100 Gy to the tumour apices of representative tumours ranging from 2- to 6-mm thickness with central plaque positioning was calculated in Plaque Simulator™. This treatment time was used for further calculations, including D99% with central plaque placement, and apical and tumour volume doses when tumour and plaque characteristics were altered, including eccentric plaque placement, either away from (tilt) or along (offset) scleral surface, tumour shape, and plaque type. RESULTS D99% was always greater than the apex dose when plaques were placed centrally, and the difference increased with tumour thickness. Increasing degrees of tumour offset reduced apical dose and D99%, with a greater effect on apical dose for thicker and D99% for thinner tumours, respectively. Differences in tumour shape and plaque type had idiosyncratic effects on apical and volume dosing. CONCLUSION D99% and apex dose are affected by tumour and treatment characteristics in different ways, highlighting the complexity of radiation delivery to uveal tumours.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeremy P M Flanagan
- Ophthalmology, Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne (Victoria), Australia; Ocular Oncology Research Unit, Centre for Eye Research Australia, Melbourne (Victoria), Australia
| | - Lotte S Fog
- Department of Ocular Oncology, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, Melbourne (Victoria), Australia
| | - Melvin A Astrahan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Lachie J Talbot
- Ophthalmology, Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne (Victoria), Australia
| | - Daniel McKay
- Ocular Oncology Research Unit, Centre for Eye Research Australia, Melbourne (Victoria), Australia; Department of Ocular Oncology, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, Melbourne (Victoria), Australia
| | - Claire Phillips
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne (Victoria), Australia
| | - John D McKenzie
- Department of Ocular Oncology, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, Melbourne (Victoria), Australia
| | - Roderick O'Day
- Ocular Oncology Research Unit, Centre for Eye Research Australia, Melbourne (Victoria), Australia; Department of Ocular Oncology, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, Melbourne (Victoria), Australia. roderick.o'
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Synoradzki KJ, Paduszyńska N, Solnik M, Toro MD, Bilmin K, Bylina E, Rutkowski P, Yousef YA, Bucolo C, Zweifel SA, Reibaldi M, Fiedorowicz M, Czarnecka AM. From Molecular Biology to Novel Immunotherapies and Nanomedicine in Uveal Melanoma. Curr Oncol 2024; 31:778-800. [PMID: 38392052 PMCID: PMC10887618 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol31020058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2023] [Revised: 12/09/2023] [Accepted: 12/19/2023] [Indexed: 02/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Molecular biology studies of uveal melanoma have resulted in the development of novel immunotherapy approaches including tebentafusp-a T cell-redirecting bispecific fusion protein. More biomarkers are currently being studied. As a result, combined immunotherapy is being developed as well as immunotherapy with bifunctional checkpoint inhibitory T cell engagers and natural killer cells. Current trials cover tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL), vaccination with IKKb-matured dendritic cells, or autologous dendritic cells loaded with autologous tumor RNA. Another potential approach to treat UM could be based on T cell receptor engineering rather than antibody modification. Immune-mobilizing monoclonal T cell receptors (TCR) against cancer, called ImmTAC TM molecules, represent such an approach. Moreover, nanomedicine, especially miRNA approaches, are promising for future trials. Finally, theranostic radiopharmaceuticals enabling diagnosis and therapy with the same molecule bring hope to this research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kamil J. Synoradzki
- Environmental Laboratory of Pharmacological and Toxicological Research, Mossakowski Medical Research Institute, Polish Academy of Sciences, 5 Pawinskiego Str., 02-106 Warsaw, Poland;
| | - Natalia Paduszyńska
- Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-091 Warsaw, Poland; (N.P.); (M.S.)
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 5 Roentgen Str., 02-781 Warsaw, Poland; (E.B.); (P.R.)
| | - Malgorzata Solnik
- Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-091 Warsaw, Poland; (N.P.); (M.S.)
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 5 Roentgen Str., 02-781 Warsaw, Poland; (E.B.); (P.R.)
| | - Mario Damiano Toro
- Chair and Department of General and Pediatric Ophthalmology, Medical University of Lublin, 1 Chmielna Str., 20-079 Lublin, Poland;
- Eye Clinic, Public Health Department, Federico II University, Via Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Krzysztof Bilmin
- Research and Development Centre Novasome Sp. z o.o., 51-423 Wrocław, Poland;
| | - Elżbieta Bylina
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 5 Roentgen Str., 02-781 Warsaw, Poland; (E.B.); (P.R.)
- Department of Clinical Trials, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Piotr Rutkowski
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 5 Roentgen Str., 02-781 Warsaw, Poland; (E.B.); (P.R.)
| | - Yacoub A. Yousef
- Department of Surgery (Ophthalmology), King Hussein Cancer Centre, Amman 11941, Jordan;
| | - Claudio Bucolo
- Department of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, University of Catania, Via S. Sofia 97, 95123 Catania, Italy;
| | - Sandrine Anne Zweifel
- Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland;
- Faculty of Human Medicine, University of Zurich, 8032 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Michele Reibaldi
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Eye Clinic Section, Citta della Salute e della Scienza, Turin University, 10122 Turin, Italy;
| | - Michal Fiedorowicz
- Small Animal Magnetic Resonance Imaging Laboratory, Mossakowski Medical Research Institute, Polish Academy of Sciences, 5 Pawinskiego Str., 02-106 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Anna M. Czarnecka
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 5 Roentgen Str., 02-781 Warsaw, Poland; (E.B.); (P.R.)
- Department of Experimental Pharmacology, Mossakowski Medical Research Institute, Polish Academy of Sciences, 5 Pawinskiego Str., 02-106 Warsaw, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gill VT, Stålhammar G. Incidence, risk factors and outcomes of cataract surgery after plaque brachytherapy for posterior uveal melanoma. Heliyon 2024; 10:e23447. [PMID: 38173489 PMCID: PMC10761564 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23447] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2023] [Revised: 12/01/2023] [Accepted: 12/04/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose To examine incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of cataract surgery after plaque brachytherapy for posterior uveal melanoma. Design Retrospective interventional cohort study contrasted with general population data. Methods All patients treated with plaque brachytherapy for a posterior uveal melanoma at Sweden's national referral center between 2010 and 2022 were included (n = 933). These patients were cross-referenced with data from the Swedish National Cataract Register. Competing risk incidences and outcomes of cataract surgery were compared with a random sample of 1000 individuals from the general population. Results The 12-year incidence of cataract surgery after plaque brachytherapy was 27 % (95 % CI 23-31 %), which markedly exceeded the incidence of 16 % in the general population (95 % CI 13-18 %, Gray's P < 0.001). Patients treated with Iodine-125 had significantly higher incidence than patients treated with Ruthenium-106, and the latter had greater incidence than the general population (P < 0.001). In univariate competing risk regressions, older patients, female sex, thick tumors, and Iodine-125 were associated with cataract surgery. In multivariate analysis, older patients and Iodine-125 retained their significance. Outcomes of cataract surgery were overall similar in the plaque brachytherapy and general population, but the general population more often received post op. topical NSAID. Conclusions In this study, plaque brachytherapy for posterior uveal melanoma was associated with a significantly increased incidence of cataract surgery. Treatment with the gamma emitting isotope iodine-125 and older patient age at the time of brachytherapy emerged as the major risk factors. Outcomes of cataract surgery were comparable to the general population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Viktor T. Gill
- Department of Pathology, Västmanland Hospital Västerås, Västerås, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Division of Eye and Vision, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Gustav Stålhammar
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Division of Eye and Vision, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Ocular Oncology Service and St. Erik Ophthalmic Pathology Laboratory, St. Erik Eye Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Stålhammar G. Brachytherapy With 15- Versus 20-mm Ruthenium 106 Plaques Without Verification of Plaque Position Is Associated With Local Tumor Recurrence and Death in Posterior Uveal Melanoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 117:1125-1137. [PMID: 37433377 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.06.077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2023] [Revised: 05/24/2023] [Accepted: 06/21/2023] [Indexed: 07/13/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Brachytherapy with episcleral plaques is the most common primary tumor treatment for uveal melanoma. This study aimed to compare the risk of tumor recurrence and metastatic death between 2 frequently used ruthenium 106 plaque designs: CCB (20.2 mm) and CCA (15.3 mm). METHODS AND MATERIALS Data were obtained from 1387 consecutive patients treated at St. Erik Eye Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden between 1981 and 2022 (439 with CCA and 948 with CCB plaques). During the period, scleral transillumination was performed to delineate tumor margins before plaque insertion, but accurate plaque positioning was not verified after scleral attachment, and no minimum scleral dose was used. RESULTS Patients treated with CCA plaques had smaller tumors than those treated with CCB plaques (mean diameter, 8.6 vs 10.5 mm; P < .001). There were no differences in patient sex, age, tumor distance to the optic disc, tumor apex dose, dose rate, or in rates of ciliary body involvement, eccentric plaque placement, or adjunct transpupillary thermotherapy (TTT). The average difference between plaque and tumor diameter was greater with the CCB plaque, and a smaller difference was an independent predictor of tumor recurrence. The 15-year incidence of tumor recurrence was 28% and 15% after treatment with CCA and CCB plaques, respectively (competing risk analysis, P < .001). Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed a lower risk for tumor recurrence with CCB plaques (hazard ratio, 0.50). Similarly, patients treated with CCB plaques had a lower risk for uveal melanoma-related mortality (hazard ratio, 0.77). The risk for either outcome was not lower for patients treated with adjunct TTT. Uni- and multivariate time-dependent Cox regressions demonstrated that tumor recurrence was associated with uveal melanoma-related and all-cause mortality. CONCLUSIONS Compared with 20-mm plaques, brachytherapy with 15-mm ruthenium plaques is associated with a higher risk for tumor recurrence and death. These adverse outcomes may be avoided by increasing safety margins and implementing effective methods to verify accurate plaque positioning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gustav Stålhammar
- St. Erik Eye Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Division of Ophthalmology and Vision, Unit of Ocular Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Jarczak J, Karska-Basta I, Romanowska-Dixon B. Deterioration of Visual Acuity after Brachytherapy and Proton Therapy of Uveal Melanoma, and Methods of Counteracting This Complication Based on Recent Publications. MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2023; 59:1131. [PMID: 37374335 DOI: 10.3390/medicina59061131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2023] [Revised: 05/30/2023] [Accepted: 06/07/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023]
Abstract
Uveal melanoma (UM) is the most common primary intraocular malignancy in adults. The eyeball is the most common extracutaneous location of melanoma. UM is a huge threat to a patient's life. It metastasizes distantly via blood vessels, but it can also spread locally and infiltrate extraocular structures. The treatment uses surgical methods, which include, among others, enucleation and conservative methods, such as brachytherapy (BT), proton therapy (PT), stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT), stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), transpupillary thermotherapy (TTT) and photodynamic therapy. The key advantage of radiotherapy, which is currently used in most patients, is the preservation of the eyeball with the risk of metastasis and mortality comparable to that of enucleation. Unfortunately, radiotherapy very often leads to a significant deterioration in visual acuity (VA) as a result of radiation complications. This article is a review of the latest research on ruthenium-106 (Ru-106) brachytherapy, iodine-125 (I-125) brachytherapy and proton therapy of uveal melanoma that took into account the deterioration of eye function after therapy, and also the latest studies presenting the new concepts of modifications to the applied treatments in order to reduce radiation complications and maintain better visual acuity in treated patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jakub Jarczak
- Department of Ophthalmology, Division of Ophthalmology and Ocular Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, 31-501 Krakow, Poland
- Jagiellonian University Medical College, Doctoral School of Medical and Health Sciences, 31-530 Krakow, Poland
| | - Izabella Karska-Basta
- Department of Ophthalmology, Division of Ophthalmology and Ocular Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, 31-501 Krakow, Poland
| | - Bożena Romanowska-Dixon
- Department of Ophthalmology, Division of Ophthalmology and Ocular Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, 31-501 Krakow, Poland
| |
Collapse
|