The British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Registers in Ankylosing Spondylitis (BSRBR-AS) study: Protocol for a prospective cohort study of the long-term safety and quality of life outcomes of biologic treatment

Commonalities and differences in set-up and data collection across European spondyloarthritis registries - results from the EuroSpA collaboration

BACKGROUND

In European axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) clinical registries, we aimed to investigate commonalities and differences in (1) set-up, clinical data collection; (2) data availability and completeness; and (3) wording, recall period, and scale used for selected patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).

METHODS

Data was obtained as part of the EuroSpA Research Collaboration Network and consisted of (1) an online survey and follow-up interview, (2) upload of real-world data, and (3) selected PROMs included in the online survey.

RESULTS

Fifteen registries participated, contributing 33,948 patients (axSpA: 21,330 (63%), PsA: 12,618 (37%)). The reported coverage of eligible patients ranged from 0.5 to 100%. Information on age, sex, biological/targeted synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug treatment, disease duration, and C-reactive protein was available in all registries with data completeness between 85% and 100%. All PROMs (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity and Functional Indices, Health Assessment Questionnaire, and patient global, pain and fatigue assessments) were more complete after 2015 (68-86%) compared to prior (50-79%). Patient global, pain and fatigue assessments showed heterogeneity between registries in terms of wording, recall periods, and scale.

CONCLUSION

Important heterogeneity in registry design and data collection across fifteen European axSpA and PsA registries was observed. Several core measures were widely available, and an increase in data completeness of PROMs in recent years was identified. This study might serve as a basis for examining how differences in data collection across registries may impact the results of collaborative research in the future.

Inflammatory Bowel Disease Risk in Patients With Axial Spondyloarthritis Treated With Biologic Agents Determined Using the BSRBR-AS and a MetaAnalysis

OBJECTIVE

To determine, among patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), whether the risk of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) varies between patients treated with biologic therapies and those treated with other therapies and, specifically, whether the risk is higher in patients treated with etanercept (ETN).

METHODS

The British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register in Ankylosing Spondylitis (BSRBR-AS) was used to determine the incidence of IBD during follow-up and to calculate the incidence rate difference (IRD) per 1000 person-years (PY), between biologic treatment and other treatment groups. We then conducted a systematic review, involving observational studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs), to perform a metaanalysis to quantify the difference in incidence of IBD between treatment groups.

RESULTS

According to the BSRBR-AS, among people with axSpA, exposure to biologic therapy was associated with an increased incidence of IBD compared to those who were not exposed to biologic therapy (IRD 11.9, 95% CI 4.3-19.6). This finding was replicated across observational studies but was not seen in placebo-controlled RCTs (IRD 2.2, 95% CI -4.1 to 8.5). Data from the BSRBR-AS do not suggest that excess incidence of IBD is associated with exposure to ETN compared to other anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) therapies (IRD -6.5, 95% CI -21.3 to 8.5). RCTs and their extensions suggest a small-yet not statistically significant-absolute increased incidence associated with ETN of between 2.1 and 5.8 per 1000 PY compared to other anti-TNF therapies.

CONCLUSION

There was an excess risk of IBD among persons treated with biologics in observational studies. Only evidence from RCTs suggested that ETN was associated with an increased risk compared to other anti-TNF therapies, albeit with considerable uncertainty.

Evaluation of Acute Phase Reactants in Patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis

Objective: To determine the high levels of acute phase reactants (APR) of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients at diagnosis and follow-up, and to investigate the relationship between patients’ high levels of APR and patients’ disease activity levels and clinical characteristics. Material and Methods : 948 patients who were diagnosed with AS according to the modified 1984 New York criteria and followed-up at the university rheumatology clinic were included in this study. The patients’ erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels across all visits were retrospectively reviewed through the registry and the hospital’s database. Results: At first visit, high levels of CRP and ESR were observed in 626 (68.5%) and 578 (64.6%) patients respectively. During follow-up 84.6% of patients had high CRP and 69.5% patients had high ESR, however in 10% of patients APRs did not increase at all. There was good correlation between ESR and CRP (r=0.666, p=0.000). A better correlation was observed at first visit between CRP and BASDAI (r=0.81, p=0.23) or ASDAS (r=0.468, p=0.000) compared to ESR and BASDAI (r=0.111, p=0.02) or ASDAS (r=0.334, p=0.000). Compared to BASDAI, ASDAS with either ESR (p=0.00) or CRP (very high disease activity-p=0.000, inactive disease-p=0.001) had better performance in evaluating the activity of the patient in inactive and very high levels of severe disease. Conclusions: Our results showed, high levels of acute phase reactants is not rare in AS patients. APR should be considered the most significant laboratory diagnostics in the evaluation of AS and/or response to the treatment.

Generating EQ-5D-5L health utility scores from BASDAI and BASFI: a mapping study in patients with axial spondyloarthritis using longitudinal UK registry data

BACKGROUND

Preference-based health-state utility values (HSUVs), such as the EuroQol five-dimensional questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L), are needed to calculate quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) for cost-effectiveness analyses. However, these are rarely used in clinical trials of interventions in axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). In these cases, mapping can be used to predict HSUVs.

OBJECTIVE

To develop mapping algorithms to estimate EQ-5D-5L HSUVs from the Bath Ankylosing Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) and the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI).

METHODS

Data from the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register in Ankylosing Spondylitis (BSRBR-AS) provided 5122 observations with complete BASDAI, BASFI, and EQ-5D-5L responses covering the full range of disease severity. We compared direct mapping using adjusted limited dependent variable mixture models (ALDVMMs) and optional inclusion of the gap between full health and the next feasible value with indirect response mapping using ordered probit (OPROBIT) and generalised ordered probit (GOPROBIT) models. Explanatory variables included BASDAI, BASFI, and age. Metrics to assess model goodness-of-fit and performance/accuracy included Akaike and Bayesian information criteria (AIC/BIC), mean absolute error (MAE) and root mean square error (RMSE), plotting predictive vs. observed estimates across the range of BASDAI/BASFI and comparing simulated data with the original data set for the preferred/best model.

RESULTS

Overall, the ALDVMM models that did not formally include the gap between full health and the next feasible value outperformed those that did. The four-component mixture models (with squared terms included) performed better than the three-component models. Response mapping using GOPROBIT (no squared terms included) or OPROBIT (with squared terms included) offered the next best performing models after the three-component ALDVMM (with squared terms). Simulated data of the preferred model (ALDVMM with four-components) did not significantly underestimate uncertainty across most of the range of EQ-5D-5L values, however the proportion of data at full health was underrepresented, likely due in part to model fitting on a small number of observations at this point in the actual data (4%).

CONCLUSIONS

The mapping algorithms developed in this study enabled the generation of EQ-5D-5L utilities from BASDAI/BASFI. The indirect mapping equations reported for the EQ-5D-5L facilitate the calculation of the EQ-5D-5L utility scores using other UK and country-specific value sets.

Lessons from experiences of accessing healthcare during the pandemic for remobilising rheumatology services: a national mixed methods study

Objectives

To understand the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on access to healthcare services for patients with inflammatory and non-inflammatory MSK conditions.

Methods

Three established cohorts which included individuals with axial spondyloarthritis, psoriatic arthritis, and musculoskeletal pain completed a questionnaire between July and December 2020. In parallel, a subset of individuals participated in semi-structured interviews.

Results

1054 people (45% female, median age 59 years) were included in the quantitative analyses. Qualitative data included 447 free-text questionnaire responses and 23 interviews. 57% respondents had tried to access care since the start of UK national lockdown. Over a quarter reported being unable to book any type of healthcare appointment. GP appointments were less likely to be delayed or cancelled compared with hospital appointments. Younger age, unemployment/health-related retirement, DMARD therapy, anxiety or depression and being extremely clinically vulnerable was associated with a greater likelihood of attempting to access healthcare. People not in work, those reporting anxiety or depression and poorer quality of life were less likely to be satisfied with remotely-delivered healthcare. Participants valued clear, timely and transparent care pathways across primary care and specialist services. Whilst remote consultations were convenient for some, in-person appointments enabled physical assessment and facilitated development and maintenance of clinical relationships with care providers.

Conclusions

We have identified patient factors that predict access to and satisfaction with care, and aspects of care that patients value. This is important to inform remobilisation of rheumatology services to better meet the needs of patients.

Depression and anxiety symptoms at TNF inhibitor initiation are associated with impaired treatment response in axial spondyloarthritis

OBJECTIVES

Depression and anxiety are associated with more severe disease in cross-sectional studies of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). We examined the association between baseline symptoms of depression or anxiety and response to TNF inhibitors (TNFi) in axSpA.

METHODS

Biologic naïve participants from a national axSpA register completed the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) before initiating TNFi. Symptoms of anxiety and depression were each categorized as moderate-severe (≥11), mild (8-10) and 'none' (≤7), and compared against change in disease indices [BASDAI and AS Disease Activity Score (ASDAS)] over time and time to treatment discontinuation using marginal structural models. Inverse-probability weights balanced baseline age, gender, BMI, deprivation, education and baseline values of respective disease indices.

RESULTS

Of the 742 participants (67% male, mean age 45 years), 176 (24%) had moderate-severe and 26% mild depression; 295 (40%) had moderate-severe and 23% mild anxiety. Baseline disease activity was higher in higher HADS symptom categories for both depression and anxiety. Participants with moderate-severe depression had significantly poorer response compared with those with 'none' throughout follow-up. At 6 months, the difference was approximately 2.2 BASDAI and 0.8 ASDAS units after balancing their baseline values. Equivalent comparisons for anxiety were 1.7 BASDAI and 0.7 ASDAS units. Treatment discontinuation was 1.59-fold higher (hazard ratio 95% CI: 1.12, 2.26) in participants with moderate-severe anxiety compared with 'none'.

CONCLUSIONS

Symptoms of depression and anxiety at TNFi initiation are associated with poorer treatment outcomes. Targeted interventions to optimize mental health have potential to substantially improve treatment response and persistence.

Comorbidity and response to TNF inhibitors in axial spondyloarthritis: longitudinal analysis of the BSRBR-AS

Objective

Comorbidities influence disease assessment in axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), but their association with response to TNF inhibitors (TNFi) is unclear. We examined associations between comorbidity history at TNFi initiation and: (i) change in disease indices over time; (ii) binary response definitions; and (iii) time to treatment discontinuation.

Methods

We studied participants starting their first TNFi from a national axSpA register. Comorbidity categories were created from 14 physician-diagnosed conditions and compared against: change in disease indices over time using linear mixed effects models; BASDAI50/2 (50% or 2-unit reduction) and BASDAI < 4 at 6 months using logistic models; and time to treatment discontinuation using Cox models. Models were adjusted for age, gender, BMI, deprivation and education.

Results

In total, 994 were eligible for analysis (68% male, mean age 45 years); 21% had one comorbidity and 11% had ≥2. Baseline disease severity was higher in those with comorbidities across all indices, but absolute improvement over time was comparable for BASDAI and spinal pain. Participants with ≥2 comorbidities had smaller absolute improvement in BASFI and quality of life. This group also had numerically reduced odds of achieving BASDAI50/2 [odds ratio (OR) 0.81; 95% CI: 0.45, 1.45] and BASDAI < 4 (OR 0.57; 95% CI: 0.32, 1.04). Treatment discontinuation was increased in those with two comorbidities [hazard ratio (HR) 1.32; 95% CI: 0.88, 2.00] and ≥3 comorbidities (HR 2.18; 95% CI: 1.20, 3.93) compared with none.

Conclusions

Participants with multiple comorbidities had poorer treatment outcomes, particularly increased treatment discontinuation and poorer improvements in function and quality of life. These results inform clinicians and educate patients about response to the first TNFi given comorbidity burden.

Association between comorbidities and disease activity in axial spondyloarthritis: results from the BSRBR-AS

Objective

Whether comorbidities influence disease activity assessment in axial SpA (axSpA) is unclear. Comorbidities inflate DAS28 in rheumatoid arthritis through the patient global score. We examined whether axSpA disease activity measures are differentially affected, and whether comorbidities inflate the AS disease activity score (ASDAS) through the patient global component.

Methods

We used baseline data from the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register for AS, including 14 physician diagnosed comorbidities. Linear models were used to compare disease activity (BASDAI, spinal pain, ASDAS) and ESR/CRP according to comorbidity count, adjusted for age, gender, BMI, smoking, socioeconomic status, and education. The same models were used to examine whether the patient global score was associated with comorbidities, additionally adjusting for other ASDAS components.

Results

The number of participants eligible for analysis was 2043 (67% male, mean age 49 years); 44% had at least one comorbidity. Each additional comorbidity was associated with higher BASDAI by 0.40 units (95% CI: 0.27, 0.52) and spinal pain by 0.53 (95% CI: 0.37, 0.68). Effect size for ASDAS (0.09 units; 95% CI: 0.03, 0.15) was not clinically significant. ESR and CRP were not associated with comorbidity count. Depression, heart failure and peptic ulcer were consistently associated with higher disease activity measures, but not CRP/ESR. Patient global was associated with comorbidity count, but not independently of other ASDAS components (P = 0.75).

Conclusion

Comorbidities were associated with higher patient reported disease activity in axSpA. Clinicians should be mindful of the potential impact of comorbidities on patient reported outcome measures and consider additionally collecting ASDAS when comorbidities are present.

The effect of COVID19 public health restrictions on the health of people with musculoskeletal conditions and symptoms: the CONTAIN study

OBJECTIVE

To quantify the change in quality of life, disease-specific indicators, health, and lifestyle before and during the COVID19 pandemic amongst people with musculoskeletal diagnoses and symptoms.

METHODS

We undertook an additional follow-up of two existing UK registers involving people with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) or psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and participants in a trial in the UK who had regional pain and were identified at high risk of developing chronic widespread pain. Participants completed the study questionnaire between July and December 2020, throughout which time there were public health restrictions in place.

RESULTS

1054 people took part in the study (596 axSpA, 162 PsA, 296 regional pain). In comparison to their previous (pre-pandemic) assessment, there was an age-adjusted significant, small, decrease in quality of life measured by EQ-5D (-0.020 95% CI (-0.030, -0.009)) overall and across all population groups examined. This was primarily related to poorer mental health and pain. There was a small increase in fibromyalgia symptoms, but a small decrease in sleep problems. There was a small deterioration in axSpA disease activity, and disease-specific quality of life and anxiety in PsA participants. Predictors of poor quality of life were similar pre- and during the pandemic. The effect of lockdown on activity differed according to age, gender, and deprivation.

CONCLUSION

Important lessons include focussing on addressing anxiety and providing enhanced support for self-management in the absence of normal health care being available, and awareness that all population groups are likely to be affected.

Predictors of extra-articular manifestations in axial spondyloarthritis and their influence on TNF-inhibitor prescribing patterns: results from the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register in Ankylosing Spondylitis

OBJECTIVES

Extra-articular manifestations (EAMs) are important systemic features of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), which may influence the choice of tumour necrosis factor-inhibitor (TNFi). We examined the cumulative incidence and predictors of EAMs and the influence of these on first TNFi choice in a 'real-world' cohort of patients with axSpA.

METHODS

Clinical and patient-reported outcomes of 2420 patients with axSpA from 83 centres were collected by the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register in Ankylosing Spondylitis. Lifestyle factors for EAMs (acute anterior uveitis (AAU), inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), psoriasis) were compared with those without EAMs. Also, the association between pretreatment EAMs and choice of first TNFi (adalimumab, etanercept, certolizumab) was analysed.

RESULTS

AAU was directly associated with human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-B27 (incidence rate ratio (IRR) 1.95, 95% CI 1.40 to 2.73) and inversely associated with ever-smoking (IRR=0.71, 95% CI 0.55 to 0.92). For both psoriasis and IBD, there was an inverse relationship with HLA-B27 (IRR 0.54, 95% CI 0.36 to 0.79 and IRR 0.63, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.91, respectively). A diagnosis of either AAU (OR 3.79, 95% CI 2.11 to 6.80) or IBD (OR 5.50, 95% CI 2.09 to 14.46) was associated with preference for adalimumab versus others. In contrast, a diagnosis of either AAU (OR 0.14, 95% CI 0.06 to 0.33) or IBD (OR 0.17, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.57) was associated with less preference for etanercept over other TNFi.

CONCLUSION

The higher occurrence of AAU and lower occurrence of psoriasis and IBD in HLA-B27-positive patients with axSpA are consistent with current pathophysiology. Patients with previous AAU and IBD are more likely to be prescribed adalimumab and less likely to receive etanercept, consistent with the superior efficacy of monoclonal TNFi for these indications. Future work will determine whether EAMs influence TNFi survival, or effectiveness, and whether this varies between agents.

Similar biologic drug response regardless of radiographic status in axial spondyloarthritis: data from the BSRBR-AS registry

OBJECTIVES

To describe the baseline characteristics, bDMARD response and drug survival of axSpA patients in the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register in Ankylosing Spondylitis (BSRBR-AS) according to radiographic status.

METHODS

BSRBR-AS is a national prospective cohort including axSpA participants classified according to the ASAS criteria. In this analysis, baseline data of patients starting bDMARDs were compared. Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Scores (ASDAS) for low disease status, clinically important improvement (CII) and major improvement (MI) at one year were used to assess treatment response. Cox proportional hazard analysis was performed after adjusting for clinically relevant cofounders.

RESULTS

1,145 axSpA patients were included. Higher male prevalence, older age and longer disease duration was seen in the r-axSpA subgroup. Based on a complete case analysis (290 patients), two thirds of patients achieved ASDAS low disease state at one year regardless of radiographic status (nr-axSpA: 64.2% vs r-axSpA: 66.1). No statistically significant differences were seen between the subgroups in attaining ASDAS CII (nr-axSpA: 50.7% vs r-axSpA: 44.7%) or MI (nr-axSpA: 20% vs r-axSpA: 18.7%). Drug survival probability curves were similar for both subgroups and hazard ratio for nr-axSpA/axSpA was 0.94 (95% CI 0.69-1.28) when adjusted for sex, age, baseline ASDAS-CRP, smoking status, disease duration, HLA-B27 and prescribed biologic.

CONCLUSIONS

Although there appeared to be some differences in the baseline characteristics when exploring this cohort according to radiographic status which are likely related to the natural history of the disease, the level of biologic response and drug survival was comparable between nr-axSpA and r-axSpA.

The changing states of fibromyalgia in patients with axial spondyloarthritis: results from the British Society of Rheumatology Biologics Register for Ankylosing Spondylitis

Objectives

To identify factors associated with FM development and recovery in patients with axial SpA (axSpA).

Methods

The British Society of Rheumatology Biologics Register for Ankylosing Spondylitis (BSRBR-AS) recruited patients with axSpA from 83 centres in a prospective study. FM was diagnosed using the self-reported Fibromyalgia Survey Diagnostic Criteria from 2015. Measures of axSpA disease activity and clinical findings were recorded at regular intervals. We identified predictors for FM development and recovery between yearly visits using uni- and multivariable logistic regression models.

Results

A total of 801 participants, 247 (30.8%) female, had two or more visits and were eligible for inclusion. A total of 686 participants did not have FM at baseline, of whom 45 had developed FM at follow-up, while 115 participants had FM at baseline, of whom 77 had recovered at follow-up. A high baseline BASDAI score [odds ratio (OR) 1.27 (95% CI 1.08, 1.49)] and Widespread Pain Index (WPI) [OR 1.14 (95% CI 1.02, 1.28)] were significantly associated with FM development in the final multivariable model. A low baseline BASFI score [OR 0.68 (95% CI 0.53, 0.86)] and WPI [OR 0.84 (95% CI 0.720, 0.97)] and starting a TNF inhibitor [OR 3.86 (95% CI 1.54, 9.71)] were significantly associated with FM recovery.

Conclusion

High levels of disease activity and the presence of widespread pain is associated with the development of FM in patients with axSpA, while low levels of the same variables and starting a TNF inhibitor are associated with recovery from FM. The presence of comorbid FM should be considered in patients with persistent high axSpA disease activity and widespread pain.

Role of Metrology in Axial Spondyloarthritis: Does It Provide Unique Information in Assessing Patients and Predicting Outcome? Results From the British Society for Rheumatology Biologic Register for Ankylosing Spondylitis

OBJECTIVE

To determine among patients with axial spondyloarthritis (SpA) the factors associated with decreased spinal mobility and to determine whether poor mobility is a predictor of response to anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) therapy.

METHODS

This was a prospective UK cohort study of persons meeting Assessment of Spondylarthritis international Society (ASAS) criteria for axial SpA. At recruitment, clinical and patient-reported factors independently associated with spinal mobility (measured by the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index [BASMI]) were determined. Among those commencing anti-TNF therapy, factors that were independent predictors of response were determined using ASAS criteria, quality of life, and Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) response criteria.

RESULTS

A total of 1,960 participants were eligible; 70% were male and the median age was 48 years (interquartile range [IQR] 37,59), median BASMI score 3.6 (IQR 2.2, 5.3). Factors independently associated with poor spinal mobility were poorer function, meeting radiographic criteria for AS, longer symptom duration, higher levels of inflammation (measured by C-reactive protein level), older age, male sex, not being currently employed, and lower levels of education. For 51% of participants, the measured BASMI score was within 1 of that estimated. Poorer mobility (higher BASMI score) was an independent predictor of not meeting response criteria for ASAS 20% improvement (odds ratio [OR] per increasing score 0.80 [IQR 0.66, 0.98]), ASAS 40% improvement (OR 0.69 [IQR 0.50, 0.95]), and quality of life (measured by the Ankylosing Spondylitis Quality of Life Questionnaire) (β = 0.64 [IQR 0.26, 1.02]), but was not related to meeting ASDAS response criteria.

CONCLUSION

The BASMI score was estimated moderately well by other routinely measured factors in patients with axial SpA and was an independent predictor of response to biologic therapy for some, but not all, commonly used measures. Consensus around its role in disease monitoring and clinical decisions, particularly in the likely context of face-to-face consultations becoming less frequent, remains to be established.

Quantifying and predicting the effect of anti-TNF therapy on axSpA-related fatigue: results from the BSRBR-AS registry and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

Effective management of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA)-related fatigue is a major unmet clinical need. Anti-TNF therapy may reduce fatigue levels, although any effect has yet to be definitively quantified and predictors of any such improvements are unknown.

METHODS

The British Society of Rheumatology Register in Axial Spondyloarthritis (BSRBR-AS) prospectively recruited axSpA patients across the UK. Changes in fatigue levels (measured using the Chalder Fatigue Scale) >1 year were compared between those starting anti-TNF therapy at the time of recruitment and those not. Differences between treatment groups were adjusted using propensity score matching. Results were meta-analysed with the extant literature to calculate pooled estimates. Then, among those BSRBR-AS anti-TNF commencers with clinically relevant fatigue, baseline predictors of response were investigated.

RESULTS

Of the 998 BSRBR-AS recruits with complete fatigue data, 310 were anti-TNF commencers. At 1-year follow-up, the former group reported a mean fatigue change of -2.6 (95% CI -4.1, -1.9) points while the latter reported a mean worsening of fatigue by 0.2 points. Following propensity score adjustment, those commencing anti-TNF therapy reduced fatigue by 3.0 points compared with those not. Of those with significant fatigue and commencing anti-TNF, poor sleep quality at baseline predicted fatigue improvement. In the meta-analysis, including 1109 subjects, treatment with anti-TNF therapy resulted in a significant improvement in fatigue [Standardized mean difference (SMD) = 0.36, 95% CI 0.15, 1.56].

CONCLUSION

Anti-TNF therapy results in a significant but modest reduction in fatigue amongst axSpA patients, with those reporting poor sleep quality most likely to report improvement. Effective management will likely require additional approaches.

Predicting response to anti-TNFα therapy among patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA): results from BSRBR-AS

OBJECTIVES

While many axSpA patients, eligible to receive anti-TNFα therapy, derive benefit when prescribed them, some patients do not. The current study aims to identify modifiable targets to improve outcome as well as non-modifiable targets that identify groups less likely to derive benefit.

METHODS

The BSRBR-AS is a prospective cohort study of axSpA patients who, at recruitment, were naïve to biologic therapy. Those in the 'biologic' sub-cohort commenced their first anti-TNFα therapy at recruitment or during follow-up. Prior to commencement, information was collected on socio-economic, clinical and patient-reported factors. Outcome was assessed according to ASAS20, ASAS40, ASDAS reduction and achieving a moderate/inactive ASDAS disease state.

RESULTS

335 participants commenced their first anti-TNFα therapy and were followed up at a median of 14 (inter-quartile range 12-17) weeks. Response varied between 33% and 52% according to criteria used. Adverse socio-economic factors, fewer years in education predicted lower likelihood of response across outcome measures as did not working full-time. Co-morbidities and poor mental health were clinical and patient-reported factors, respectively, associated with lack of response. The models, particularly those using ASDAS, were good at predicting those who did not respond (negative predictive value (NPV) 77%).

CONCLUSION

Some factors predicting non-response (such as mental health) are modifiable but many (such as social/economic factors) are not modifiable in clinic. They do, however, identify patients who are unlikely to benefit from biologic therapy alone. Priority should focus on how these patients receive the benefits that many derive from such therapies.

Outcomes and treatment responses, including work productivity, among people with axial spondyloarthritis living in urban and rural areas: a mixed-methods study within a national register

Objective

To examine differences in clinical and patient-reported outcomes, including work, in individuals with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) living in rural and urban settings.

Methods

Using a sequential, explanatory mixed-method design, data from the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register for Ankylosing Spondylitis were used to (1) characterise participants with axSpA living in rural and urban areas and (b) assess any differences in outcome after commencement of biologic therapy (phase 1). Semistructured interviews (phase 2) further explored the results from phase 1.

Results

Patients with axSpA living in rural areas were older and more likely to work in a physical job. Among patients prescribed biologics, there were no differences in response to biologics, but after adjustment for age, sex and local area deprivation rural dwellers reported more presenteeism and overall work impairment. Work effects could be explained by accounting for individual differences in disease activity, fatigue, physical function and job type. Interviews highlighted the complex relationship between clinical factors, contextual factors (work environment, job demands) and work disability. The ability to work and flexibility in terms of what, when and how tasks are undertaken were important. Support from employers was variable and healthcare professionals were often perceived as unsupportive.

Conclusions

Patients with axSpA living in rural areas report a greater impact of their disease on work productivity. New measures are needed to capture important contextual factors and comprehensively determine the impact of long-term conditions on work. Future European League Against Rheumatism axSpA recommendations should include support to work as a target to optimise quality of life in patients with axSpA.

Real-world evidence of TNF inhibition in axial spondyloarthritis: can we generalise the results from clinical trials?

Management guidelines assume that results from clinical trials can be generalised, although seldom is data available to test this assumption. We aimed to determine the proportion of patients commencing tumour necrosis factor inhibition (TNFi) who would have been eligible for relevant clinical trials, and whether treatment response differs between these groups and the trials themselves. The British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register for Ankylosing Spondylitis (BSRBR-AS) recruited a real-world cohort of TNFi-naïve spondyloarthritis patients with data collection from clinical records and patient questionnaires. Participant characteristics were extracted from trials identified from a recent Health Technology Assessment of TNFi for ankylosing spondylitis/non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis. Descriptive statistics were used to determine the differences, including treatment response, between BSRBR-AS participants who would/would not have been eligible for the clinical trials and with trial participants. Among 2420 BSRBR-AS participants, those commencing TNFi (34%) had shorter symptom duration (15 vs 22 years) but more active disease (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) 6.4 vs 4.0; Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Functional Index (BASFI) 6.2 vs 3.8). Of those commencing TNFi, 41% met eligibility criteria for ≥1 of fourteen relevant trials; they reported higher disease activity (BASDAI 6.9 vs 6.1) and poorer function (BASFI 6.6 vs 6.0). 61.7% of trial participants reported a positive treatment response, vs 51.3% of BSRBR-AS patients (difference: 10.4%; 95% CI 4.4% to 16.5%). Potential eligibility for trials did not influence treatment response (difference 2.0%; -9.4% to 13.4%). Fewer patients in the real world respond to TNFi than is reported in the trial literature. This has important implications for the generalisability of trial results, and the cost-effectiveness of TNFi agents.

Impact of Smoking in Response to Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors in Axial Spondyloarthritis: Methodologic Considerations for Longitudinal Observational Studies

OBJECTIVE

Observational data facilitate examination of treatment-effect heterogeneity, but the risk of bias is substantial. The present study was undertaken to highlight methodologic considerations through an analysis of whether smoking affects response to tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) in axial spondyloarthritis (SpA).

METHODS

We used longitudinal data from the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register for Ankylosing Spondylitis. Participants fulfilling the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society criteria for axial SpA who started their first TNFi were eligible for analysis. In comparing the impact of smoking status, weighted generalized estimating equations were used to examine changes in several continuous outcome measures, including the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) and the Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS). Inverse probability weights were used to account for differences in baseline covariates and excluded participants. We separately assessed response in the first 3 months to account for nonrandom dropout.

RESULTS

For 840 participants who started on TNFi, 1,641 assessments from 627 individuals were analyzed (69% male, mean age 46 years). A total of 33% were current smokers and 30% ex-smokers. Ex-smokers and current smokers had worse disease than never smokers at baseline. Accounting for these differences, response did not differ according to smoking status. Compared to never smokers, ex-smokers (β = -0.6, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] -1.4, 0.3) and current smokers (β = -0.4, 95% CI -1.1, 0.4) had a similar response according to the BASDAI and ASDAS (ex-smokers β = -0.1, 95% CI -0.5, 0.3; current smokers β = -0.01, 95% CI -0.4, 0.4) at 3 months.

CONCLUSION

TNFi response did not differ according to baseline smoking status in this UK cohort. Conflicting results from previous studies were likely due to methodologic differences. This analysis highlights potential sources of bias that should be addressed in future studies.

Associations between smoking and extra-axial manifestations and disease severity in axial spondyloarthritis: results from the BSR Biologics Register for Ankylosing Spondylitis (BSRBR-AS)

OBJECTIVE

The effects of smoking on disease manifestations in axial SpA are inadequately described. Utilizing a large and well-characterized cohort, we investigated the association between smoking and extra-axial manifestations, and smoking and disease severity measures.

METHODS

Baseline data from the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register for Ankylosing Spondylitis were explored. Our analyses focused on extra-axial manifestations and other disease severity measures, including scales for fatigue, sleep, anxiety and depression. Logistic and linear models were used to quantify associations between disease characteristics according to smoking status (current/ex/never) and quantity (heavy/light), adjusting for age, gender, BMI, education, deprivation, comorbidities, symptom duration and alcohol status.

RESULTS

A total of 2031 participants were eligible for the current analysis (68% male, mean age 49 years). Of these, 24% were current and 32% ex-smokers. When compared with non-smokers, current smokers had lower odds of uveitis [OR 0.7, 95% CI 0.5-0.9] and higher odds of psoriasis (ORadj 1.6, 95% CI 1.1-2.3). Ex- and current smokers had incrementally more severe disease than never smokers, with higher BASDAI (β = 0.3, 95% CI 0.1-0.6; β = 0.9, 95% CI 0.6-1.2) and BASFI (β = 0.5, 95% CI 0.2-0.8; β = 1.3, 95% CI 1.0-1.6); similar associations were observed for fatigue, sleep, anxiety and depression.

CONCLUSION

In this large cross-sectional study, we observed that smoking is independently associated with an adverse disease profile in axial SpA, including worse fatigue, sleep, anxiety and depression, and higher odds of psoriasis. The paradoxical association between current smoking and reduced odds of uveitis is interesting and warrants further investigation.

Determining factors related to poor quality of life in patients with axial spondyloarthritis: results from the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register (BSRBR-AS)

OBJECTIVE

To determine modifiable factors associated with poor quality of life (QoL) in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA).

METHODS

Analysis of data from the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register in Ankylosing Spondylitis (BSRBR-AS) and validation of a previous model using data from 1810 patients with axSpA recruited during 2012-2017. Data collected included clinical and patient-reported measures. QoL was assessed using the Ankylosing Spondylitis Quality of Life (ASQoL) measure. Linear regression models predicting ASQoL scores were used first to validate a previous model from a national study, to extend this with additional information available in BSRBR-AS and finally to identify a 'de novo' model from BSRBR-AS of which factors impact on poor QoL.

RESULTS

Four out of five factors included in a previous model of poor QoL in patients with axSpA were confirmed: Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index and Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index, fatigue and widespread pain, although the performance of the model was improved by the addition of measures of mood and sleep disturbance. In a de novo model in BSRBR-AS, there were six factors (other than disease activity and function) that predicted ASQoL: depression (β=0.16), sleep disturbance (β=0.08), activity impairment (β=0.04), fibromyalgia (Symptom Severity Scale (β=0.24) and Widespread Pain Index (β=0.10)) and tobacco smoking (β=0.66).

CONCLUSION

This study confirms that poor QoL in patients with axSpA, in addition to high disease activity and poor function, is independently influenced by sleep disturbance, mood and widespread pain. These additional factors are not considered targets for treatment in current European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) guidelines for managing the condition.

Discontinuation, persistence and adherence to subcutaneous biologics delivered via a homecare route to Scottish adults with rheumatic diseases: a retrospective study

OBJECTIVES

To understand patterns of subcutaneous (SC) biologics use over time in adults with inflammatory rheumatic musculoskeletal diseases receiving a homecare delivery service.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort.

SETTING

Patients in secondary care receiving SC biologics in the largest Scottish Health Board.

PARTICIPANTS

A new bespoke cohort was created from routine data gathered as part of a health board Homecare Service Database. Patients over 18 years who received a supply of SC biologic from January 2012 to May 2015 with a diagnosis for rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA) or ankylosing spondylitis (AS) were included.

OUTCOMES MEASURED

A standardised framework was applied by measuring discontinuation rates, persistence using Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression and adherence using medication refill adherence (MRA) and compliance rate (CR).

RESULTS

751 patients were identified (AS: 105, PsA: 227, RA: 419) of whom 89.3% had more than one biologic delivery (median days' follow-up: AS: 494; PsA: 544; RA: 529) and 83.2% did not switch biologic. For all conditions, approximately half were persistent on their index biologic (52% AS, 54% PsA, 48%RA). Of patients who discontinued treatment, the majority reinitiated with the same biologic (19% AS, 18% PsA and 21% RA). Overall adherence during the period of treatment was over 80% when calculated using MRA (median %MRA: AS: 84.0%, PsA: 85.0%, RA: 82.4%) or CR (median %CR: AS: 96.6%, PsA: 97%, RA: 96.6%).

CONCLUSION

Use of linked routine data is a sustainable pathway to enable ongoing evaluation of biologics use. A more consistent approach to studying use (discontinuation, persistence and adherence metrics) should be adopted to enable comparability of studies.

Smoking status and cause-specific discontinuation of tumour necrosis factor inhibitors in axial spondyloarthritis

Background

The impact of smoking on TNF inhibition (TNFi) therapy is unclear. We examined the effect of smoking on all-cause and cause-specific TNFi discontinuation in axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA).

Methods

We used longitudinal data from the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register for Ankylosing Spondylitis (BSRBR-AS). Patients fulfilling the ASAS criteria for axSpA, who started their first TNFi, were eligible for analysis. Inverse-probability weights were used to balance differences in baseline disease severity and other confounders. We used marginal structural Cox proportional hazard models to estimate hazard ratios (HR) for TNFi discontinuation according to smoking status. In analyses of cause-specific discontinuation, competing risk events were considered as censoring, using inverse-probability weights.

Results

A total of 758 participants were included in the analysis (66% male, mean age 45 years), providing 954 patient-years of follow-up. TNFi was discontinued in 174 (23%) patients, among whom 26% stopped due to infections, 20% due to other adverse events and 44% due to inefficacy or other reasons. Thirty-four percent were current smokers and 30% ex-smokers. Compared to never smokers, current smokers’ risk of TNFi discontinuation was HR 0.79 (95%CI 0.53 to 1.20) and ex-smokers HR 0.68 (95%CI 0.45 to 1.04). Our data did not show evidence that current smoking influenced discontinuation due to infections (HR 0.79, 95%CI 0.40 to 1.54), other adverse events (HR 0.86, 95%CI 0.41 to 1.78) or inefficacy/other causes (HR 1.44, 95%CI 0.86 to 2.41).

Conclusion

Baseline smoking status did not impact TNFi discontinuation in this UK cohort of axSpA participants.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s13075-019-1958-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Influence of co-morbid fibromyalgia on disease activity measures and response to tumour necrosis factor inhibitors in axial spondyloarthritis: results from a UK national register

Objective

To quantify the extent to which co-morbid FM is associated with higher disease activity, worse quality of life (QoL) and poorer response to TNF inhibitors (TNFis) in patients with axial SpA.

Methods

A prospective study recruiting across 83 centres in the UK. Clinical information and patient-reported measures were available, including 2011 criteria for FM. Multivariable linear regression was used to model the effect of meeting the FM criteria on disease activity, QoL and response to TNFis.

Results

A total of 1757 participants were eligible for analyses, of whom 22.1% met criteria for FM. Those with co-morbid FM criteria had higher disease activity [BASDAI average difference FM⁺ − FM⁻ 1.04 (95% CI 0.75, 1.33)] and worse QoL [Ankylosing Spondylitis Quality of Life score difference 1.42 (95% CI 0.88, 1.96)] after adjusting for demographic, clinical and lifestyle factors. Among 291 participants who commenced biologic therapy, BASDAI scores in those with co-morbid FM were 2.0 higher at baseline but decreased to 1.1 higher at 12 months. There was no significant difference in the likelihood of meeting Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society 20 criteria at 12 months. Less improvement in disease activity and QoL over 3 months of TNFi therapy was most strongly related to high scores on the FM criteria symptom severity scale component.

Conclusion

Fulfilling criteria for FM has a modest impact on the assessment of axial SpA disease activity and QoL and does not significantly influence response to biologic therapy. Those with a high symptom severity scale on FM assessment may benefit from additional specific management for FM.

AxSpA patients who also meet criteria for fibromyalgia: identifying distinct patient clusters using data from a UK national register (BSRBR-AS)

Background

Around 1 in 8 patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) also meet criteria for fibromyalgia and such patients have considerable unmet need. Identifying effective therapy is important but to what extent fibromyalgia-like symptoms relate to axSpA disease severity has not been established. The aim of the current analysis was to determine whether distinct clusters of axSpA patients exist and if so to determine a) whether they differ in terms of prevalence of fibromyalgia and b) the features of patients in clusters with high prevalence.

Methods

The British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register (BSRBR-AS) recruited axSpA patients from 83 centres 2012-2017. Clinical data, and information from patients was collected (including research criteria for fibromyalgia). Cluster analysis was undertaken using split samples for development and validation both in the whole population and the sub-group which met fibromyalgia criteria.

Results

One thousand three hundred thirty-eight participants were included of whom 23% met research criteria for fibromyalgia. Four clusters were identified. Two exhibited very high disease activity, one which was primarily axial (n = 347) and a smaller cluster (n = 32) with axial and peripheral disease, and in both groups more than half of members met criteria for fibromyalgia. The remaining two clusters (n = 437, n = 462) had overall less severe disease however the one which showed greater disease activity and poorer quality of life had a higher proportion meeting fibromyalgia criteria (16% v. 4%). Within those meeting fibromyalgia criteria there were three clusters. The two main groups were defined by level of symptom severity with a smaller third cluster noted to have high average swollen and tender joint counts and high levels of comorbidity.

Conclusions

The major feature defining clusters with a high proportion of persons meeting criteria for fibromyalgia is high axSpA disease activity although clusters with features of fibromyalgia in the absence of high disease activity also show moderately high prevalence. Management may be most successful with pharmacologic therapy to target inflammation but enhanced by the concurrent use of non-pharmacologic therapy in such patients.

Safety and Survival Associated with Biologic Therapies: First Report of the Biobadaguay on the Paraguayan-Uruguayan Registry of Adverse Events with Biologic Therapies

OBJECTIVE

Analyze adverse events (AE) and survival associated with biologic therapies (BT) in the Biobadaguay, the Paraguayan Uruguayan registry of adverse events.

METHODS

Prospective, observational study of undetermined duration. Patients on BT at initiation and controls were included. Clinical, biological and treatment variables were registered.

RESULTS

A total of 826 registers were entered (650 BT and 176 controls); 70.9% were women and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) was the most frequent diagnosis (63.2%). The BT most often used was adalimumab and the main cause of discontinuation was loss of efficacy (42.1%). The incidence of AE of patients on BT was 143.9 (128.8-160.8) per 1000 patients/year. In the comparative study of AE related to diagnosis, juvenile idiopathic arthrosis (JIA) was associated with a higher overall number of AE (RTI = 2.3; 95%CI: 1.6-3.4; P = 4.27 ×10^-6), whereas RA was associated with a higher number of serious AE (RTI = 2.2; 95% CI: 1.2-4.1; P =1.17 ×10^-2). On the other hand, treatment with tocilizumab was associated with a higher rate of AE (RTI = 2.69; 95% CI: 1.9-3.82; P = 3.13 ×10^-8). In JIA, treatment with corticosteroids and number of previous BT was associated with a decrease in BT survival.

CONCLUSION

In this first report of the Biobadaguay registry, the main cause of BT discontinuation was loss of efficacy. In terms of the diagnosis involved, RA and JIA were associated with a higher risk of AE. In this registry, variables related to a shorter survival of BT were identified.

Impact of biological therapy on work outcomes in patients with axial spondyloarthritis: results from the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register (BSRBR-AS) and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To quantify, among patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), the benefit on work outcomes associated with commencing biologic therapy.

METHODS

The British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register in Axial Spondyloarthritis (BSRBRAS) recruited patients meeting Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society criteria for axSpA naïve to biological therapy across 83 centres in Great Britain. Work outcomes (measured using the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Index) were compared between those starting biological therapy at the time of recruitment and those not. Differences between treatment groups were adjusted using propensity score matching. Results from BSRBR-AS were combined with other studies in a meta-analysis to calculate pooled estimates.

RESULTS

Of the 577 participants in this analysis who were in employment, 27.9% were starting biological therapy at the time of recruitment. After propensity score adjustment, patients undergoing biological therapy, at 12-month follow-up, experienced significantly greater improvements (relative to non-biological therapy) in presenteeism (-9.4%, 95% CI -15.3% to -3.5%), overall work impairment (-13.9%, 95% CI -21.1% to -6.7%) and overall activity impairment (-19.2%, 95% CI -26.3% to -12.2%). There was no difference in absenteeism (-1.5%, 95% CI -8.0 to 4.9). Despite these improvements, impact on work was still greater in the biological treated cohort at follow-up. In the meta-analysis including 1109 subjects across observational studies and trials, treatment with biological therapy was associated with significantly greater improvements in presenteeism, work impairment and activity impairment, but there was no difference in absenteeism.

CONCLUSIONS

There is consistent evidence that treatment with biological therapy significantly improves work productivity and activity impairment in people with axSpA. However, there remain substantial unmet needs in relation to work.

Identifying Persons with Axial Spondyloarthritis At Risk of Poor Work Outcome: Results from the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register

OBJECTIVE

First, to test the hypothesis that, among working patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), those who report issues with reduced productivity at work (presenteeism) are at higher risk of work absence (absenteeism), and patients who report absenteeism are at higher risk of subsequently leaving the workforce. Second, to identify characteristics of workers at high risk of poor work outcome.

METHODS

The British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register in Ankylosing Spondylitis has recruited patients meeting Assessment of Spondyloarthritis international Society criteria for axSpA from 83 centers. Data collection involved clinical and patient-reported measures at recruitment and annually thereafter, including the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment scale. Generalized estimating equations were used to identify factors associated with poor work outcomes.

RESULTS

Of the 1188 participants in this analysis who were working at recruitment, 79% reported some presenteeism and 19% some absenteeism in the past week owing to their axSpA. Leaving employment was most strongly associated with previous absenteeism (RR 1.02 per % increase in absenteeism, 95% CI 1.01-1.03), which itself was most strongly associated with previous presenteeism, a labor-intensive job, and peripheral joint involvement. High disease activity, fatigue, a labor-intensive job, and poorer physical function were all independently associated with future presenteeism.

CONCLUSION

Clinical and patient-reported factors along with aspects of work are associated with an increased risk of axSpA patients having a poor outcome in relation to work. This study has identified modifiable factors as targets, facilitating patients with axSpA to remain productive at work.

Risk of serious infection among patients receiving biologics for chronic inflammatory diseases: Usefulness of administrative data

•

In this cohort, adalimumab and etanercept are the most commonly prescribed biologics.

•

Risk of hospitalized infections increases under biologic agents.

•

Risk is much higher in the elderly and in the presence of comorbidities.

•

Upper and lower respiratory tract infections are the most common infections.

•

Administrative data are useful for confirming the observation of clinical trials.

Risk of hospitalized infections under biologics among patients suffering from chronic inflammatory autoimmune diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA), ankylosing spondylitis (AS), psoriatic arthritis (PSA), or psoriasis was investigated using administrative data. The hospital discharge records database, the medical prescription database, and the database of exemptions from medical charges were linked at the individual patient level. A cohort of patients diagnosed with RA, SA, PSA, and severe psoriasis from 2006 to 2017 was identified and followed-up to either the end of 2017 or hospitalization with the main discharge diagnosis of infection, death, or they moved out of the region. Multiple Cox regression was used to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) of hospitalization associated with bDMARDs and adjusting for age, sex, Charlson’s Comorbidity Index, calendar year, prescription of steroids, and use of csDMARDs. Use of bDMARDs was treated as a time-dependent variable. A total of 5596 patients diagnosed with RA, AS, or PSA/severe psoriasis were included in the cohort. Overall, 289 (4.2%) were hospitalized due to infection. Time to first use of biological drugs was significantly associated with a 55% increased risk of hospitalization for infections. Thus, large cohorts from administrative databases are useful to support observations from registries and clinical trials. Patients with chronic autoimmune inflammatory diseases are at risk of serious infections when starting biologics. This risk is higher in the elderly or those with comorbidities. Upper and lower respiratory tract infections are the most common infections. Our findings support prevention policies such as vaccination.

Risk of serious infections in biological treatment of patients with ankylosing spondylitis and non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis: a meta-analysis

The objective of the study is to quantitatively assess the risk of serious infections in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (AS) and non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr-axSpA) treated by biologics enrolled in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). A systematic literature searches of MEDLINE (via PubMed), EMBASE, the Cochrane Library and abstracts archives of the annual scientific meetings of both the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) and the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) was conducted through October 2015. The RCTs that compared the safety of any biologics treatment for AS or nr-axSpA with placebo and/or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and/or conventional disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) with a minimum of 12 weeks of follow-up were selected independently by 2 reviewers. Twenty-five RCTs with data from 2403 patients were analyzed in the analysis. Patients included active AS in 21 studies and nr-axSpA in 4 studies were treated by 5 TNF inhibitors (adalimumab, certolizumab, etanercept, golimumab and infliximab) and 3 non-TNF inhibitors (sarilumab, tocilizumab, secukinumab). The risk of serious infections has no difference and numerically was only slightly increased in patients with AS and nr-axSpA treated by biologics compared with controls (OR = 1.42; 95%CI 0.58-3.47). Stratified analysis yielded the pooled risk differences (RDs) of 0.00 (95%CI, - 0.01 to 0.01), 0.01 (95%CI - 0.01 to 0.03), - 0.00 (95%CI -0.01 to 0.01), 0.00 (95%CI - 0.02 to 0.02), 0.01 (95%CI -0.01 to 0.03) and 0.01 (95%CI -0.02 to 0.04) for adalimumab, certolizumab, etanercept, golimumab, infliximab and non-TNF inhibitors respectively. There are also no significant effect of biologics on serious infections was observed compared with controls in patients with AS (p = 0.29) and nr-axSpA (p = 0.89). The use of biologics among patients with AS and nr-axSpA included in RCTs was not significantly associated with an increased risk of serious infections compared with placebo or NSAIDs or DMARDs.

The value of pragmatic and observational studies in health care and public health

Evidence-based practice is an important component of health care service delivery. However, there is a tendency, embodied in tools such as Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation, to focus principally on the classification of study design, at the expense of a detailed assessment of the strengths and limitations of the individual study. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and in particular the classical “explanatory” RCT, have a privileged place in the hierarchy of evidence. However, classical RCTs have substantial limitations, most notably a lack of generalizability, which limit their direct applicability to clinical practice implementation. Pragmatic and observational studies can provide an invaluable perspective into real-world applicability. This evidence could be used more widely to complement ideal-condition results from classical RCTs, following the principle of triangulation. In this review article, we discuss several types of pragmatic and observational studies that could be used in this capacity. We discuss their particular strengths and how their limitations may be overcome and provide real-life examples by means of illustration.

Risk of malignancy in ankylosing spondylitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Current knowledge about the overall and site-specific risk of malignancy associated with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is inconsistent. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to address this knowledge gap. Five databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, the Cochrane library and the virtual health library) were systematically searched. A manual search of publications within the last 2 years in key journals in the field (Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, Rheumatology and Arthritis & rheumatology) was also performed. STATA 11.2 software was used to conduct the meta-analysis. After screening, twenty-three studies, of different designs, were eligible for meta-analysis. AS is associated with a 14% (pooled RR 1.14; 95% CI 1.03–1.25) increase in the overall risk for malignancy. Compared to controls, patients with AS are at a specific increased risk for malignancy of the digestive system (pooled RR 1.20; 95% CI 1.01 to 1.42), multiple myelomas (pooled RR 1.92; 95% CI 1.37 to 3.69) and lymphomas (pooled RR 1.32; 95% CI 1.11 to 1.57). On subgroup analysis, evidence from high quality cohort studies indicated that AS patients from Asia are at highest risk for malignancy overall. Confirmation of findings from large-scale longitudinal studies is needed to identify specific risk factors and to evaluate treatment effects.