Comparison of screening strategies for prevalent vertebral fractures in South Korea: vertebral fracture assessment vs. spine radiography

Quality improvement initiative: implementing routine vertebral fracture assessments into an Australian Fracture Liaison Service

Osteoporosis is a global health concern and a major contributor to worldwide mortality rates. Vertebral fractures due to osteoporosis are common and often undetected. Since vertebral fractures are often missed, evidence and guidelines suggest that vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) may optimise current approaches to bone density tests. We aimed to integrate VFA into an Australian Fracture Liaison Service (FLS) and measure the impact it had on osteoporosis treatment initiation.A retrospective case note review was undertaken to determine the number of clinic patients receiving VFA before the change in practice. Proctor's seven domains of implementation strategy were used to facilitate quality improvement outcomes.The percentage of eligible patients receiving a routine VFA at the FLS imaging centre increased from 0% to 90%. The remaining 10% of patients did not receive a scan due to the patient not being able to assume the correct position, skilled staff being unavailable to perform the scan, or the patient declining. Post implementation, almost half (41%) of patients who underwent a VFA displayed abnormalities and 16 (4%) of these recorded a normal bone measure density score but abnormal VFA. Despite the successful adoption of the new screening protocol, there was no statistically significant increase in treatment initiation rates for patients with normal bone mass density scores.The FLS successfully integrated routine VFA into the osteoporosis care pathway. However, the introduction of VFA did not significantly increase treatment initiation. It may be more effective to offer VFAs to a proportion of patients based on a tailored approach rather than offering them routinely to all patients who access the FLS.

Estimating the future clinical and economic benefits of improving osteoporosis diagnosis and treatment among postmenopausal women across eight European countries

A population-level, cross-sectional model was developed to estimate the clinical and economic burden of osteoporosis among women (≥ 70 years) across eight European countries. Results demonstrated that interventions aimed at improving fracture risk assessment and adherence would save 15.2% of annual costs in 2040.

PURPOSE

Osteoporosis is associated with significant clinical and economic burden, expected to further increase with an ageing population. This modelling analysis assessed clinical and economic outcomes under different hypothetical disease management interventions to reduce this burden.

METHODS

A population-level, cross-sectional cohort model was developed to estimate numbers of incident fractures and direct costs of care among women (≥ 70 years) in eight European countries under different hypothetical interventions: (1) an improvement in the risk assessment rate, (2) an improvement in the treatment adherence rate and (3) a combination of interventions 1 and 2. A 50% improvement from the status quo, based on existing disease management patterns, was evaluated in the main analysis; scenario analyses evaluated improvement of either 10 or 100%.

RESULTS

Based on existing disease management patterns, a 44% increase in the annual number of fractures and costs was predicted from 2020 to 2040: from 1.2 million fractures and €12.8 billion in 2020 to 1.8 million fractures and €18.4 billion in 2040. Intervention 3 provided the greatest fracture reduction and cost savings (a decrease of 17.9% and 15.2% in fractures and cost, respectively) in 2040 compared with intervention 1 (decreases of 8.7% and 7.0% in fractures and cost, respectively) and intervention 2 (10.0% and 8.8% reductions in fracture and cost, respectively). Scenario analyses showed similar patterns.

CONCLUSION

These analyses suggest that interventions which improve fracture risk assessment and adherence to treatments would relieve the burden of osteoporosis, and that a combination strategy would achieve greatest benefits.

Current Applications and Selected Technical Details of Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry

The application of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) examinations in the assessment of bone mineral density (BMD) in the lumbar spine, hip, and forearm is the basic diagnostic method for recognition of osteoporosis. The constant development of DXA technique is due to the aging of societies and the increasing importance of osteoporosis as a public health problem. In order to assess the degree of bone demineralization in patients with hyperparathyroidism, forearm DXA examination is recommended. The vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) of the thoracic and lumbar spine, performed by a highly-skilled technician, is an interesting alternative to the X-ray examination. The DXA total body examination can be useful in the evaluation of fat redistribution among patients after bariatric surgery, in patients infected with HIV and receiving antiretroviral therapy, and in patients with metabolic diseases and suspected to have sarcopenia. The assessment of visceral adipose tissue (VAT) and detection of abdominal aortic calcifications may be useful in the prediction of cardiovascular events. The positive effect of anti-resorptive therapy may affect some parameters of DXA hip structure analysis (HSA). Long-term anti-resorptive therapy, especially with the use of bisphosphonates, may result in changes in the DXA image, which may herald atypical femur fractures (AFF). Reduction of the periprosthetic BMD in the DXA measurements can be used to estimate the likelihood of loosening the prosthesis and periprosthetic fractures. The present review aims to present current applications and selected technical details of DXA.

Evaluation of the increased risk of spine fracture in patients with mood disorder compared with matched controls: a longitudinal follow-up study using a national sample cohort in Korea

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the risk of spine fracture in patients with mood disorder using a nationwide cohort.

DESIGN

A longitudinal follow-up study.

SETTING

Claims data for the population ≥20 years of age were collected from 2002 to 2013 for the Korean National Health Insurance Service-National Sample Cohort.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 60 140 individuals with mood disorder were matched with 240 560 individuals (control group) for age, sex, income, region of residence and osteoporosis.

INTERVENTIONS

In both the mood disorder and control groups, the history of spine fracture was evaluated. The International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision codes for mood disorder (F31-F39) and spine fracture (S220 and S320) were included.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

The univariable and multivariable HRs and 95% CIs of spine fracture for patients with mood disorder were analysed using a stratified Cox proportional hazards model. Subgroup analyses were conducted according to the history of osteoporosis, age and sex.

RESULTS

Approximately 3.3% (2011/60 140) of patients in the mood disorder group and 2.8% (6795/240 560) of individuals in the control group had spine fracture (p<0.001). The mood disorder group demonstrated a higher adjusted HR for spine fracture than the control group (multivariable HR=1.10, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.15, p<0.001). The participants without osteoporosis showed a higher HR of mood disorder for spine fracture than the control participants (multivariable HR=1.25, 95% CI 1.14 to 1.37, p<0.001). According to age and sex, this result was consistent in subgroups of women aged 20-39 and 40-59 years and men aged ≥60 years.

CONCLUSION

The risk of spine fracture was increased in patients with mood disorder. The potential risk of spine fracture needs to be evaluated when managing patients with mood disorder.