The incidence and treatment trends of pediatric proximal humerus fractures

Plate osteosynthesis of proximal humerus fracture is associated with significant complications and poor functional score for patients older than 45 years: a cohort study

BACKGROUND

Despite the introduction of new implants and biomechanical improvements for proximal humerus fractures (PHF), the complication rate remains significant, particularly in older adults. This study aimed to identify risk factors for complications and failure following plate osteosynthesis for PHF and discuss an age cut-off that surgeons should consider for complications.

METHODS

Adults with PHF treated with the proximal humerus internal locking system at our large tertiary academic referral center between 2015 and 2020 were retrospectively identified. Univariate analysis was used to compare patients with and without complications. Then, a multivariate regression analysis was conducted to assess the possible complication risk factors. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of age was drawn to predict complication-free and favorable functional outcomes at the most recent follow-up. Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS) was considered favorable if OSS < 10.

RESULTS

A total of 135 patients were identified, with a mean age of 44 years (range 18-85 years) and a mean follow-up duration of 4.6 years (range 2-8 years). Complications were observed in 19 cases (14.1%), namely nonunion (n = 5), avascular necrosis (n = 1), infection (n = 1), intra-articular screw perforation (n = 1), arthritic changes (n = 5), and superior humeral head migration (n = 5). Eight patients (5.9%) needed revision surgery. Older age (OR = 1.09) and Neer IV class (OR = 8.3) were associated with an increased likelihood of complication (P < .001, P = .02, respectively) in logistic multinominal regression analysis. The ROC curve for age in predicting complication-free cases had an area under the curve of 0.829, indicating age as a significant predictor of open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) outcomes in PHF (P < .05). The optimal cut-off for age was 44 years, which yielded a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 65.7. The age ROC curve for predicting favorable OSS (OSS < 10) had an OSS of 0.829, indicating that age could predict the favorable OSS outcomes of ORIF in PHF. The optimal age cut-off was 46 years, yielding a sensitivity of 70.0% and a specificity of 78.6%.

CONCLUSION

The outcomes of ORIF for PHF in patients older than 45 years are associated with significantly higher complication rates and poorer functional outcomes. Surgeons should possibly consider other treatment options for PHF in each older patient individually, especially with Neer type IV fractures.

Displaced proximal humeral fractures in skeletally immature patients: functional outcomes of surgical treatment

PURPOSE

To report the functional results of our experience and to describe intraoperative findings and complications due to the techniques used in our service.

METHODS

From January 2018 to December 2022, 27 Pediatric patients aged from 8 to 16 years underwent surgery to treat proximal humerus fractures. Their demographic characteristics were evaluated, as well as their clinical characteristics on admission, type of reduction (closed/open), presence of interposition in open reductions, type of implant, complications, and functional range of movement according to two shoulder functional scores.

RESULTS

Mean age was 11.2 years (8-15), there was a predominance of males, who accounted for 70% of the cases, and sports accidents were the cause of injury in 44% of the cases. Anatomical location was balanced between patients, including 55% of physeal fractures and 45% of metaphyseal ones. Overall, 81.5% of patients required open reduction to achieve axis correction, and that 55.5% of fractures were fixed with Kirschner wires, and 44, 4% with elastic titanium nails. Mean QuickDASH score was 0.58 (0-1.7), and Constant score was 9 (3-24). There were no major complications, but 27% of cases subjected to open reduction presented a hypertrophic scar.

CONCLUSION

Surgical treatment of severely displaced proximal humerus fractures is successful, both with closed and open reduction; type of implant does not play a key role and should be selected based on the characteristics of each case. Surgical training should prevail at the time of decision-making. When these recommendations are followed, results can be excellent and sequelae are infrequent.

Operative Versus Nonoperative Treatment of Displaced Proximal Humerus Fractures in Adolescents: Results of a Prospective Multicenter Study

BACKGROUND

Proximal humerus fractures (PHFx) constitute around 2% of all pediatric fractures. Although younger children with displaced fractures often undergo nonoperative treatments, optimal treatment for adolescents is not well defined. The study aimed to assess the outcomes of operative versus nonoperative treatment of displaced proximal humerus fractures in adolescents via a prospective multicenter study.

METHODS

This prospective study assessed adolescents aged 10 to 16 years with displaced PHFx from 2018 to 2022 at 6 level 1 trauma centers. Displacement criteria for inclusion were >50% shaft diameter or angulation >30 degrees on AP/lateral shoulder X-rays. Operative versus nonoperative treatment was decided by the treating physician. Radiographic and clinical data were collected at 6 weeks, 3, and 6 months. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) included: Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMIS), Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), and QuickDASH questionnaires. Patients were further grouped into a severe displacement cohort, defined as angulation >40° or displacement >75%. Clinical and radiographic data were compared between the 2 treatment cohorts.

RESULTS

Out of 78 enrolled patients, 36 (46%) underwent operative treatment. Patients treated operatively were significantly older (13.5 vs. 12.2 y, P <0.001) and exhibited greater mean angulation on AP shoulder view at presentation (31.1° vs. 23.5°, P <0.05). All PROs improved over time. At 6 weeks, operative patients demonstrated superior PROMIS upper extremity scores based on the minimally clinically important difference (MCID) (46.4 vs. 34.3, P =0.027); however, this distinction disappeared by 3 months. In a subanalysis of 35 patients with severe displacement, 21 (60.1%) underwent surgical intervention. No metrics showed significant differences between treatment modalities, with all PROs achieving population norm values by 3 months. Range of motion showed no difference between operative and nonoperative treatments, irrespective of fracture displacement.

CONCLUSION

We found no differences in PROs and ROM between operative and nonoperative treatments of PHFx. If not contraindicated, nonoperative treatment may reduce healthcare costs and risks associated with surgery and should be considered for displaced adolescent proximal humerus fractures, irrespective of fracture displacement.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

Open plate fixation in displaced pediatric proximal humerus fractures is safe and leads to very good functional outcomes

INTRODUCTION

In displaced pediatric proximal humerus fractures (PHF), surgical treatment ranges from closed to open procedures. Soft tissue interposition can impede closed reduction, making open techniques necessary. While K-wire fixation and elastic stable intramedullary nailing (ESIN) lead to good results, plate fixation could be an alternative in patients with limited growth potential and highly unstable or insufficiently retained fractures. Only few studies with low sample sizes have assessed plate fixation, yet. In this study, the outcome of pediatric PHFs treated with plate fixation was evaluated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We present a retrospective case series of 18 patients with open growth plates and unilateral, displaced PHFs, treated with plate fixation. The mean age at trauma was 12.1 years (± 2.4), the mean follow-up was 6.52 years (± 4.37). A mean fracture angulation of 32.3° (± 10.89°) was seen. Postoperative assessments included range of motion, clinical scores [Simple Shoulder Test (SST), Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Shoulder Score, Pediatric/Adolescent Shoulder Score (PASS), Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) Score], radiological parameters and subjective satisfaction.

RESULTS

All patients showed excellent results in SST (99.4% ± 0.02), SSV (98.3% ± 0.04), ASES-score (100% ± 0) and PASS (0.99 ± 0.01). In the DASH-score, 17 patients had excellent results, one patient showed a good outcome. Fracture healing occurred in all patients without complications. Eight patients complained about bothering scars. Age, gender and fracture morphology did not affect the outcome. Revision surgery after secondary fracture dislocation did not show a worsened outcome compared to primary plate fixation. Physeal growth plate bridging implants did not worsen the outcome. The timing of implant removal within the first 6 months postoperatively did not affect long-term function.

CONCLUSION

Plate fixation is a safe option in pediatric patients with limited growth potential and highly displaced PHFs. Plate fixation led to a good to excellent functional outcome, regardless of fracture morphology and implant positioning. A higher invasiveness and the need for implant removal must be considered.

Proximal humeral fractures in children - controversies in decision making

BACKGROUND

Proximal humeral fractures in children are rare and usually treated non-operatively, especially in children younger than ten. The decision between operative and non-operative treatment is mostly based on age and fracture angulation. In the current literature, diverging recommendations regarding fracture angulation that is still tolerable for non-operative treatment can be found. Besides, there is no consensus on how fracture angulation should be determined. This study aimed to determine whether leading experts in pediatric trauma surgery in Germany showed agreement concerning the measurement of fracture angulation, deciding between operative and non-operative treatment, and choosing a treatment modality.

METHODS

Twenty radiographs showing a proximal humeral fracture and the patient's age were assessed twice by twenty-two senior members of the "Section of Pediatric Traumatology of the German Association for Trauma Surgery". Experts determined the fracture angulation and chose between several operative and non-operative treatment modalities. The mean of individual standard deviations was calculated to estimate the accuracy of single measurements for fracture angulation. Besides Intra-Class Correlation and Fleiss' Kappa coefficients were determined.

RESULTS

For fracture angulation, experts showed moderate (ICC = 0.60) interobserver and excellent (ICC = 0.90) intraobserver agreement. For the treatment decision, there was fair (Kappa = 0.38) interobserver and substantial (Kappa = 0.77) intraobserver agreement. Finally, experts preferred ESIN over K-wires for operative and a Gilchrist over a Cuff/Collar for non-operative treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Firstly, there is a need for consensus among experts on how fracture angulation in PHFs in children should be reliably determined. Our data indicate that choosing one method everybody agrees to use could be more helpful than using the most sophisticated. However, the overall importance of fracture angulation should also be critically discussed. Finally, experts should agree on treatment algorithms that could translate into guidelines to standardize the care and perform reliable outcome studies.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

[Treatment of proximal humeral fractures in childhood and adolescence : Consensus report of the pediatric traumatology section of the German Society for Trauma Surgery]

BACKGROUND

Proximal humeral fractures are a relatively common injury in childhood and adolescence, accounting for 0.45-2% of all fractures [2, 18]. Treatment is usually conservative but is still the subject of a scientific debate [9, 12]. In addition to the S1-LL, there are different recommendations for the diagnostics and treatment of these fractures in the literature.

METHODOLOGY

As part of the 10th scientific meeting of the SKT of the DGU, the existing recommendations and the relevant or current literature were critically discussed by a panel of experts and a consensus was formulated. An algorithm for the diagnostics, therapy and treatment was integrated into this.

RESULTS

The measurement of axial deviation and tilt is not interobserver and intraobserver reliable [3]. The age limit for when complete correction is possible was set at an age of 10 years, as the correction potential changes around this age. For diagnostic purposes, well-centered X‑ray images in 2 planes (true AP and Y‑images without thoracic parts) is defined as the standard. At the age of less than 10 years, any malposition can be treated conservatively with Gilchrist bandaging for 2-3 weeks. Surgery can only be indicated in individual cases, e.g., in the event of severe pain or the need for rapid weight bearing. An ad latus displacement of more than half the shaft width should not be tolerated over the age of 10 years. Due to the variance in the measurement results, it is not possible to recommend surgical treatment depending on the extent of the ad axim dislocation. As a guideline, the greater the dislocation and the closer the child is to growth joint closure, the more likely surgical treatment is indicated. The development should be taken into account. The gold standard is retrograde, radial and unilateral ESIN osteosynthesis using two intramedullary nails. Osteosynthesis does not require immobilization. A follow-up X‑ray is planned for unstable fractures without osteosynthesis after 1 week, otherwise optional for documentation of consolidation after 4-6 weeks, e.g., if sports clearance is to be granted and before metal removal (12 weeks).

CONCLUSION

Recommendations for surgical indications based on the extent of tilt are not reproducible and seem difficult in view of the current literature [3, 9, 12]. A pragmatic approach is recommended. The prognosis of the fracture appears to be so good, taking the algorithm into account, that restitutio ad integrum can be expected in most cases.

Fixation of Paediatric Proximal Humerus Fractures Using Percutaneous Pinning: A Case Report

A 12-year-old male came to our Emergency Department with chief complaints of pain and inability to move the right shoulder for one day following a fall while playing. The range of motion of the right shoulder was restricted and painful in all directions. Initial radiographs revealed a transverse, displaced proximal humerus fracture at the head-shaft junction. The patient was managed by closed reduction internal fixation with percutaneous K-wiring (Kirschner wires). The K-wires were removed after four weeks, and the shoulder was mobilized. The patient had a near-normal and pain-free range of motion at three months of follow-up. Percutaneous K-wiring remains a viable option for the treatment of paediatric proximal humerus fractures, and good post-operative rehabilitation can help restore near-normal function, as demonstrated in this report.

Return to Play in Youth Athletes: Role of the Radiologist with Focus on the Upper Extremity

Increase in youth sports participation, longer duration of play, and earlier starting points have increased the prevalence of acute and repetitive overuse musculoskeletal injuries. This rise in injury rates has led to increased efforts to better understand the susceptible sites of injury that are unique to the growing immature skeleton. Upper extremity injuries are currently the best studied, particularly those that occur among pediatric baseball players and gymnasts. The weak link in skeletally immature athletes is the growth plate complex that includes those injuries located at the epiphyseal and apophyseal primary physes and the peripherally located secondary physes. This article reviews the anatomy and function of these growth plate complexes, followed by a discussion of the pathophysiologic mechanisms, spectrum of imaging findings, and existing evidence-based guidelines for injury prevention and return to play.

Is There a Role for Isolated Closed Reduction in the Emergency Department Without Fixation for Displaced Proximal Humerus Fractures in Adolescents?

OBJECTIVE

Pediatric proximal humerus fractures (PHFx) are uncommon and makeup ~2% of all pediatric fractures. Traditionally, most cases are treated nonoperatively with closed reduction (CR) or immobilization with no reduction (INR) with excellent outcomes. Indications for CR without fixation remain unclear as immobilization in the position of reduction (shoulder abduction and external rotation) is not practical. We aim to determine the need for CR among adolescents with displaced PHFx treated nonoperatively.

METHODS

We conducted an IRB-approved prospective multicenter study involving 42 adolescents aged 10 to 16 years, treated for displaced PHFx across 6 institutions between 2018 and 2022. CR was performed under conscious sedation in the emergency department, with data collected during follow-up visits at 6 weeks and 3 months. Radiographic measurements, range of motion, and patient-reported outcomes, including the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Upper Extremity and Physical Function, Shoulder Pain and Disability Index, and QuickDash scores, were compared between the INR and CR groups.

RESULTS

Among 42 fractures, 23 (55%) were treated with INR and 19 (45%) with CR, followed by placement in a hanging arm cast or sling. Of the cases, 62% were high-energy injuries. Radiographic alignment and range of motion were similar between groups at preoperative, 6 weeks, and 3 months with no significant differences noted.Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Upper Extremity, Physical Function, QuickDash, and Shoulder Pain and Disability Index scores at 6 weeks and 3 months showed no significant differences between cohorts. Significant improvement was observed between 6 weeks and 3 months for every patient-reported outcome in both cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

For displaced PHFx treated nonoperatively, our data suggests INR has a similar radiographic and clinical outcome when compared with CR. Our results question the necessity of performing CR in this group of patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II-therapeutic studies: prospective cohort study.

A Rare Combined Injury in Children during Side Impact: The Possible Mechanism and Treatment Results

OBJECTIVE

Proximal humeral fracture combined with contralateral midshaft clavicle fracture is an extremely rare injury in children. Few studies focus on the injury mechanism and treatment scheme. The aim of this study is to propose the possible mechanism of this injury and present the treatment results.

METHODS

This retrospective study included children diagnosed with proximal humeral fractures combined with contralateral midshaft clavicle fractures from August 2016 to March 2019 in the corresponding author's institution. The patients received elastic stable intramedullary nails and external fixation as treatment. The radiological and clinical outcomes of treatments were evaluated using the imaging and the Constant-Murley score (CMS) in follow up.

RESULTS

Twelve patients (eight males and four females) with an average age of 7.83 years old (age 5-12) were included in this research. All the patients had suffered a side impact in a road traffic accident or outdoor environment. Hypothesis about the mechanism was the proximal humerus was directly impacted at first and caused the surgical neck fracture, then the contralateral shoulder hits the solid object and the contralateral midshaft clavicle was fractured. During the average 45.2 months (range 36-57) follow-up, all the patient's fractures achieved clinical and radiological union before 14 weeks without complications. Every patient had a satisfactory score (range from 92 to 100) on the CMS criteria for both shoulders.

CONCLUSION

The hypothesis about the mechanism of this combined injury in this study sounds reasonable. It highlights the need for safety-related education about using a safety seat or wearing a seat belt to parents and caregivers, so as to avoid such injury even if the treatment with external fixation (EF) and proximal humeral and elastic stable intramedullary nailing (ESIN) showed good results.

Operative Versus Nonoperative Management of Pediatric Proximal Humerus Fractures: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review

Background

Proximal humerus fractures account for 2% of all pediatric fractures. A nonoperative approach is the treatment of choice for most of these fractures; however, debates continue regarding the treatment of displaced fractures, especially in adolescents. In this study, we aimed to examine demographic data and treatment strategies for proximal humerus fractures in the pediatric population by conducting a meta-analysis. Additionally, we investigated the preferred surgical technique for operative treatment.

Methods

A systematic online search of databases, including Embase, Medline, PubMed, and Cochrane Library, was conducted to identify studies that matched our search criteria. Data collection was completed on May 1, 2022. Age, sex, degree of angulation, Neer-Horwitz classification, Salter-Harris classification, treatment method (operative vs. nonoperative), and instrument used for internal fixation were classified and documented. Effect size analysis was performed using odds ratios (ORs) or weighted mean differences (WMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), based on data types.

Results

Eight studies met our inclusion criteria. Overall, 33% of the patients (n = 195) underwent operative treatment, whereas 67% of them (n = 392) received nonoperative treatment. Among the demographic risk factors, severely displaced fracture type (OR, 10.00; 95% CI, 1.56-64.22; p = 0.020) and older age (WMD, 3.26; 95% CI, 2.29-4.23; p < 0.001) were significantly associated with operative treatment. There was no significant difference in the preference for percutaneous pinning or intramedullary nailing, the most frequently employed surgical techniques (OR, 5.09; 95% CI, 0.65-39.58; p = 0.120).

Conclusions

The operative treatment rate in pediatric proximal humerus fractures was 33%, which increased to 60% in severely displaced fractures (Neer-Horwitz grade III/IV). Severely displaced fractures and older age significantly contributed to the establishment of a treatment strategy for operative treatment. The choice of surgical technique may seem to be based on the anatomical location of the fracture rather than the surgeon's preference.

Kirschner wire versus external fixation in the treatment of proximal humeral fractures in older children and adolescents: a comparative study

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to compare the therapeutic effects of Kirschner wire fixation and external fixation in the treatment of proximal humeral fractures in older children and adolescents.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on the clinical data of older children and adolescents who underwent surgery at our institution for proximal humeral fractures between April 2014 and May 2022. One group (n = 28) underwent fracture reduction and Kirschner wire fixation, and the other group (n = 23) underwent external fixation. During the follow-up, the differences in shoulder joint function between the two groups were compared by analysing Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (Quick DASH) and Constant-Murley scores. Postoperative complications were also recorded.

RESULTS

The operation time of the Kirschner wire group was shorter than that of the external fixation group (69.07 ± 11.34 min vs. 77.39 ± 15.74 min, P = 0.33). The time to remove the fixator in the external fixation group was shorter than that in the Kirschner wire group (6.74 ± 1.57 vs. 7.61 ± 1.22, P = 0.032). The Quick DASH score and Constant-Murley score of the patients in the external fixation group were significantly better than those in the Kirschner wire group at 3 months after surgery (5.63 ± 4.33 vs. 8.93 ± 6.40, P = 0.040; 93.78 ± 2.43 vs. 91.75 ± 2.15, P = 0.003). There was no significant difference in the Quick DASH score or Constant-Murley score between the patients in the external fixator group and those in the Kirschner wire group at 9 months after the operation (2.77 ± 3.14 vs. 3.17 ± 3.68, P = 0.683; 97.39 ± 1.80 vs. 96.57 ± 2.15, P = 0.152). The most common complication of the two groups was pin tract infection. The incidence rate of infection was higher in the external fixation group than that in the Kirschner wire group (9 vs. 4, P = 0.043).

CONCLUSION

Both Kirschner wire fixation and external fixation of N-H III and IV proximal humeral fractures in older children and adolescents produce good outcomes. External fixation is a preferred surgical treatment option for paediatric proximal humerus fractures because early mobilization of the affected limb can be realized.

Fractures around the shoulder in the skeletally immature: A scoping review

Fractures around the shoulder girdle in children are mainly caused by sports accidents. The clavicle and the proximal humerus are most commonly involved. Both the clavicle and the proximal humerus have a remarkable potential for remodeling, which is why most of these fractures in children can be treated conservatively. However, the key is to understand when a child benefits from surgical management. Clear indications for surgery of these fractures are lacking. This review focuses on the available evidence on the management of clavicle and proximal humerus fractures in children. The only strict indications for surgery for diaphyseal clavicle fractures in children are open fractures, tenting of the skin with necrosis, associated neurovascular injury, or a floating shoulder. There is no evidence to argue for surgery of displaced clavicle fractures to prevent malunion since most malunions are asymptomatic. In the rare case of a symptomatic malunion of the clavicle in children, corrective osteosynthesis is a viable treatment option. For proximal humerus fractures in children, treatment is dictated by the patient's age (and thus remodeling potential) and the amount of fracture displacement. Under ten years of age, even severely displaced fractures can be treated conservatively. From the age of 13 and onwards, surgery has better outcomes for severely displaced (Neer types III and IV) fractures. Between 10 and 13 years of age, the indications for surgical treatment are less clear, with varying cut-off values of angulation (30-60 degrees) or displacement (1/3 - 2/3 shaft width) in the current literature.

Outcomes at a Mean of 13 Years After Proximal Humeral Fracture During Adolescence

BACKGROUND

The long-term outcomes of a proximal humeral fracture during adolescence are not well known. We investigated the course of primary treatment for these injuries and the long-term outcomes in adulthood, comparing the outcomes with those from age-matched controls. We also compared outcomes after operative and nonoperative treatment via propensity score matching.

METHODS

We included children who sustained a proximal humeral fracture between the ages of 10.0 and 16.0 years and underwent treatment between 1995 and 2005. Data from primary treatment episodes were extracted from patient files. The patients were invited to a follow-up visit with outcome assessment and radiographs or to a telephone interview if unable to attend. The primary outcome was the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire. The secondary outcomes were the Simple Shoulder Test (SST), pain at rest and with strenuous use, shoulder range of motion, strength measurements, health-related quality of life (15D), and harms. Participant results were compared with the normal values of an age-matched population. The effect of operative treatment was assessed using propensity score matching and the average treatment effect was calculated.

RESULTS

This study included 209 patients (210 fractures). The mean follow-up (and standard deviation) was 13.1 ± 3.2 years. Outcome data were obtained from 152 participants (153 fractures); 78 participants attended the follow-up visit. The primary treatment episodes were uneventful. The mean scores were 2.5 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.8 to 3.3 [range, 0 to 13]) for the DASH and 11.7 (95% CI, 11.5 to 11.8 [range, 8 to 12]) for the SST. Other outcomes were similarly good. There were no differences in function compared with the normal population values. Propensity matching showed no treatment effect for operative treatment compared with nonoperative treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Proximal humeral fractures of adolescents heal well and rarely result in impairments whether treated operatively or nonoperatively.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Percutaneous Fixation of Pediatric Proximal Humerus Fractures

Proximal humerus fractures can be seen in children and adolescents after a fall or following significant trauma, like motor vehicle accidents. Significant remodeling potential from the proximal humeral physis along with the wide arc of motion of the shoulder allows for good outcomes with nonoperative care for minimally displaced fractures and fractures in younger children. Operative management is reserved for fractures with greater displacement and angulation, particularly in adolescents nearing skeletal maturity. Closed reduction techniques in the operating room can be difficult due to patient size, fracture displacement, interposed tissue, and deforming forces acting on the proximal humerus. Skeletal stabilization after closed reduction can include percutaneous pins, screws, and flexible nails. Here, we describe a technique for percutaneous reduction and fixation of the difficult-to-reduce proximal humerus fracture. Key Concepts•The proximal humeral physis has considerable remodeling potential, allowing for significant tolerance of deformity in skeletally immature children.•Radiographic and age-based indications for reduction and fixation of proximal humerus fractures remain controversial, but multiply injured patients and significantly displaced fractures in those nearing skeletal maturity are most likely to benefit from surgical management.•Percutaneous reduction techniques can aid in improving fracture alignment when closed maneuvers fail without the need for an extensive open approach.•Screw fixation may provide certain advantages in comparison to pin fixation.

Child Fractures: Are We Getting More Surgical?

Historically, surgeries on the immature skeleton were reserved for open or articular fractures. In recent years, the improvement in the quality and safety of anesthesia, new imaging equipment, implants designed especially for pediatric fractures, associated with the possibility of shorter hospitalization time and rapid return to social life has demonstrated a new tendency to evaluate and treat fractures in children. The purpose of this update article is to answer the following questions: (1) Are we really turning more surgical in addressing fractures in children? (2) If this is true, is this surgical conduct based on scientific evidence? In fact, in recent decades, the medical literature demonstrates articles that support better evolution of fractures in children with surgical treatment. In the upper limbs, this is very evident in the systematization of the reduction and percutaneous fixation of supracondylar fractures of the humerus and fractures of the forearm bones. In the lower limbs, the same occurs with diaphyseal fractures of the femur and tibia. However, there are gaps in the literature. The available published studies show low scientific evidence. Thus, it can be inferred that, even though the surgical approach is more present, the treatment of pediatric fractures should always be individualized and conducted according to the knowledge and experience of the professional physician, taking into account the presence of technological resources available for the care of the small patient. All possibilities, non-surgical and/or surgical, should be included, always instituting actions based on science and in agreement with the family's wishes.

Bone cemented K-wire fixation versus elastic stable intramedullary nailing fixation of paediatric proximal humerus fractures: A prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study is to compare the treatments of pediatric displaced proximal humerus fractures with external-fixation technique using the combination of K-wires and bone-cement versus close reduction and internal fixation technique using elastic stable intramedullary nail.

METHODS

From April 2016 to March 2020, 72 children with proximal humeral fractures were allocated to group A and 44 children with proximal humeral fractures were allocated to group B. Patients in group A were treated with bone-cemented K-wire fixation, and patients in group B were treated with elastic stable intramedullary nailing. The function of the upper limb was assessed using the Shortened Version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire and Neer score. Patient satisfaction was assessed using the 10-cm visual analogue scale.

RESULTS

Bone healing was achieved in group A and B after a mean time of 6.1 ± 1.2 and 6.4 ± 1.1 weeks, respectively. The mean surgical time of groups was 33 ± 9 and 54 ± 12 minutes, respectively. The mean Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire score of groups were 0.5 ± 1.4 and 0.7 ± 1.5, respectively. Based on Neer score, we obtained 69 excellent and 3 good results in group A, and 41 excellent and 3 good results in group B. There were significant differences regarding duration of operation, cost of treatment, and postoperative angle at bone healing (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

The external cemented K-wire fixation is a useful and reliable alternative technique for the treatment of severely displaced proximal humerus fractures in children. The technique is a minimally invasive procedure with minimal complications.

Proximal humerus fractures in adolescents: Experience from East of Scotland

BACKGROUND

The management of proximal humerus fractures (PHF) in adolescent has not been agreed upon. We aim to investigate the outcomes of PHF managed conservatively in adolescents.

METHODS

All shoulder radiographs performed in patients aged from 10 to 18 years and from 2008 to 2015 were reviewed. The radiological parameters, including anatomical side, Neer and Horwitz displacement grade, angulation and any residual deformities were recorded. Mail questionnaires based on the modified 15-Upper Extremities Functional Index (15-UEFI), with a maximum of 59 points, were sent out. The return of the completed anonymized questionnaire was considered as implied consent.

RESULTS

118 patients with a median age of 12 at the time of fracture were identified. The majority of the fractures were Neer and Horwitz grade I displacement and 3 children had Neer and Horwitz grade III and IV displacement. The median angulation was 25°. The median follow-up length was 26 days. 55 patients had residual angulation and 25 patients had worsened angulation. No non-union was identified. No patients underwent subsequent corrective surgeries. 35 patients responded to the questionnaire. The median 15-UEFI was 59 points. None of the patients have contacted the research or clinical team regarding any concerns.

CONCLUSION

The vast majority of non-displaced and minimally displaced PHF in adolescent were managed conservatively in our unit. The functional outcomes for this cohort remain excellent even for those with residual deformities in the follow-up radiographs. Further large prospective multicenter studies on adolescent cohort with significantly displaced PHF are warranted.

Management of Pediatric Proximal Humerus Fractures

Proximal humerus fractures have an outstanding potential to remodel due to their proximity to the proximal humeral physis. Fractures in young children can be treated nonoperatively with excellent outcomes. The incidence peaks in adolescent patients and these injuries most commonly occur after a fall or direct trauma. The muscle attachments of the proximal humerus act as deforming forces and anatomic structures such as the periosteum and biceps tendon may act as blocks to reduction. Operative management is uniformly indicated for patients with open fractures, ipsilateral elbow or forearm injury, associated neurovascular injury, or poly-trauma patients. Operative treatment may be further considered in older children with minimal growth remaining and with fractures that are considered significantly displaced by available classification systems. Unfortunately, there are significant challenges in recommending treatment based on displacement and age alone. The purpose of this paper is to review what is known about these injuries and how they can be treated in light of current deficiencies in the literature; this may stimulate further work to refine indications for treatment based upon age and displacement. Key Concepts•The proximal humerus physis is responsible for 80% of the growth of the entire bone, and proximal humerus fractures have tremendous potential to remodel.•Proximal humerus fractures occur most commonly due to a fall or direct trauma but other causes include overuse injury and pathologic lesions.•Treatment indications for pediatric proximal fractures are guided by age of the patient, fracture displacement, and associated injuries; the majority of these injuries may be treated nonoperatively.•Outcomes after operative and nonoperative management of proximal humerus fractures are generally good.

Efficacy analysis of a double-Schanz screw external fixator combined with anti-rotating Kirschner wire in the treatment of proximal humerus fractures in skeletally immature patients

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of a double-Schanz screw external fixator combined with anti-rotating Kirschner wire in the treatment of displaced Salter-Harris type II proximal humerus fractures in skeletally immature patients.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on 22 cases of displaced Salter-Harris type II proximal humerus fractures in skeletally immature patients who were treated with a double-Schanz screw external fixator combined with anti-rotating Kirschner wire. Patients included were the Neer-Horowitz (N-H) type 2, 3, and 4 of fracture. The basic information of the patients was recorded, fracture healing and shoulder range of motion were assessed at the last follow-up visit. The disabilities of the arm, hand (DASH) score and Constant-Murley score of the shoulder were performed to observe the occurrence of complications.

RESULTS

The mean age at the time of surgery was 12.41 years, and all patients completed a median follow-up of 18.18 months. There were two cases of N-H type 2, 12 cases of N-H type 3, and eight cases of N-H type 4 among the patients. At the last follow-up, all patients were able to achieve pain-free shoulder movement. There was no significant difference in shoulder function between the injured side and the uninjured side. The DASH score mean was 2.43 (95% CI 1.44-3.52). The constant score mean was 98.55 (95% CI 97.73-99.27). All patients returned to their pre-injury daily life and physical activities, and there was no significant difference in bilateral limb length at the last follow-up (p < 0.05). The most common complication of double-Schanz screw external fixator combined with anti-rotating Kirschner wire surgery was pin tract infection, which occurred in 5 cases (22.7%). There were no complications such as deep infections, vascular and nerve damage, failure of fixation, secondary fracture displacement, non-union of fracture, osteonecrosis of the humerus, joint stiffness, rotator cuff weakness and limb deformity.

CONCLUSION

The double-Schanz screw external fixator combined with anti-rotating Kirschner wire is a safe and effective treatment for displaced Salter-Harris type II proximal humerus fractures in skeletally immature patients over the age of 10 years.

A case of bilateral humerus varus from the late antiquity Catacomb of Santa Mustiola (Chiusi, Italy)

OBJECTIVE

To report a case of bilateral humerus varus from a late antiquity archeological context in central Italy.

MATERIALS

The individual is a 25-40-year-old female, dated to the 4th cent. CE, from the catacomb of Santa Mustiola in Chiusi, Italy.

METHODS

The bones were examined macroscopically and through CT scan imaging.

RESULTS

Both humeri show evident alterations in shape, including elongated, flattened and distally dislocated humeral heads, shortened anatomical necks, angulated upper diaphyseal shafts, and reduced overall lengths. The scapulae appear to have been mildly affected by this condition and show some bone loss and slight retroversion of the glenoid cavity.

CONCLUSIONS

Observations are consistent with a diagnosis of humerus varus deformity likely caused by a traumatic event early in the individual's life.

SIGNIFICANCE

Varus deformity of the proximal humerus is seldom reported in bioarcheological literature. The case presented provides insight into the etiology and effects of this condition and may serve as comparison for future studies.

LIMITATIONS

Even though the absence of other skeletal deformities renders a systemic condition improbable, the traumatic etiology of the condition cannot be confirmed with certainty.

SUGGESTIONS FOR FURTHER RESEARCH

Future publications of new cases may give a broader perspective of the etiology of this condition in the past.

Predictors of outcomes of proximal humerus fractures in children and adolescents: A systematic review

PURPOSE

Minimally displaced pediatric proximal humerus fractures can be reliably managed non-operatively; however, there is considerable debate regarding the appropriate management of severely displaced proximal humerus fractures, particularly in older children and adolescents with limited remodeling potential. The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review to answer the questions: "What are the functional and quality-of-life outcomes of pediatric proximal humerus fractures?" and "What factors have been associated with a poorer outcome?"

METHODS

A review of Medline and Embase was performed on 4 July 2021 using search terms relevant to proximal humerus fractures, surgery, non-operative management, pediatrics, and outcomes. Studies including ≥10 pediatric patients with proximal humerus fractures, which assessed clinical outcomes by use of an established outcome measure, were selected. The following clinical information was collected: participant characteristics, treatment, complications, and outcomes.

RESULTS

Twelve articles were selected, including four prospective cohort studies and eight retrospective cohort studies. Favorable outcome scores were found for patients with minimally displaced fractures, and for children aged less than 10 years, irrespective of treatment methodology or grade of fracture displacement. Older age at injury and higher grade of fracture displacement were reported as risk factors for a poorer patient-reported outcome score.

CONCLUSION

An excellent functional outcome can be expected following non-operative management for minimally displaced pediatric proximal humerus fractures. Prospective trials are required to establish a guideline for the management of severely displaced proximal humerus fractures in children and adolescents according to fracture displacement and the degree of skeletal maturity.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

level V.

Outcomes of proximal humerus fractures in children: a study protocol for a retrospective cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Proximal humerus fractures (PHFs) comprise <3% of all fractures in children and adolescents. While it is accepted that minimally displaced PHFs can be treated conservatively, the management of severely displaced PHFs remains controversial, especially in older children. This study will aim to analyse the functional and quality-of-life outcomes of children with PHFs, in order to inform their optimal management.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

We will conduct a retrospective cohort study to evaluate the outcomes of patients who were diagnosed with a paediatric PHF at the Women's and Children's Hospital (WCH) in South Australia. The primary outcome will be each participant's pain and quality-of-life outcome, determined by use of the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand, Shoulder Pain and Disability Index and Paediatric Outcomes Data Collection Instrument. Secondary outcomes will include rates of non-union, persistent deformity and complications. The information for these variables will be acquired during a brief clinic appointment, and from the medical records and WCH radiology database. Multivariable logistic regression will be performed to determine the clinical variables associated with a worse clinical outcome.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study has been approved by the Women's and Children's Health Network Human Research Ethics Committee (protocol number: 2021/HRE00250). The study findings will be submitted to peer-reviewed scientific journals for publication and disseminated at conference presentations.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12622000176763).

The use of the pediatric physeal slide-traction plate in the treatment of neer–horwitz grade IV proximal humeral fractures in children: A case report and literature review

Background

Proximal humeral fractures (PHFs) are rare in children. Currently, the recommended surgical methods for severely displaced PHFs are closed reduction and percutaneous fixation using K-wires or intramedullary nailing, which can't provide firm internal fixation, especially for older and high-weight children. This study aimed to introduce a novel surgical approach, pediatric physeal slide-traction plate fixation (PPSP), for Neer–Horwitz grade IV PHFs in children.

Case summary

A 9-year-old boy presented with left shoulder pain and swelling due to a car accident. Physical examination revealed a positive shoulder deformity and local tenderness. On physical examination, we palpated bone friction without vascular and nerve damage. Based on imaging findings, we diagnosed Neer-Horwitz grade IV PHF. In view of the patient's condition, we performed PPSP after careful communication with the patient's parents. After 22 months of follow-up, the patient's left shoulder function was satisfactory, and there was no restriction of activities.

Conclusion

According to previous studies, PPSP is only used for femur fractures. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first in the treatment for PHFs. Given the satisfactory outcomes, it is a safe and effective method and may provide a reference to cure analogous patients in the future.

Radiographic pseudosubluxation of the shoulder in pediatric proximal humeral fractures

This study was undertaken to determine the incidence, need for intervention, and time to resolution of pseudosubluxation of the shoulder in pediatric proximal humerus fractures. One hundred and ninety-nine radiographs (199 x-rays) were analyzed for pseudosubluxation of the shoulder following pediatric proximal humeral fractures. Pseudosubluxation occurs when the center of the humeral head aligns with the inferior one-fourth of the glenoid. Fourteen patients met the inclusion criteria for pseudosubluxation. The nonoperative cohort consisted of 100 females and 93 males and the operative cohort consisted of 3 males and 3 females. Total 14 children out of 199 had pseudosubluxation. Ten pseudosubluxations were seen 7 days postinjury and four were noted immediately after injury. Pseudosubluxation was seen in nine boys (64%) and five girls (36%) in the nonoperative group. Increased relative risk (RR) was associated with: fall >3 m (RR = 25.7; 95% CI, 2.7-244.0), motorized transport (RR = 11.7; 95% CI, 1.41-96.03) and sports injuries (RR = 11.0, 95% CI, 1.2-100). No statistical analysis was conducted on the operative group given the small sample. This study establishes incidence, risk factors and expected clinical course for pseudosubluxation following proximal humerus fractures. The overall incidence in the nonoperative cohort was 7.3%, radiographic evidence of pseudosubluxation resolution was available for (n = 10) patients with 100% resolution by 6 weeks. There were no readmissions or complications in the 14 patients. Pseudosubluxation occurrence was significantly increased in four mechanisms: falls >3 m, sports trauma and motor transportation. This study provides the natural history and risk factors for pseudosubluxation following proximal humerus fractures. Pseudosubluxation is more likely to occur in higher energy fracture mechanisms and will resolve without treatment. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective cohort.

Epidemiology of proximal and diaphyseal humeral fractures in children: an observational study from the Swedish Fracture Register

Background

Most fractures in children are fractures of the upper extremity. Proximal and diaphyseal humeral fractures account for a minority of these fractures. To our knowledge, few previous reports address these fractures. This study aimed to describe the epidemiology and current treatment of proximal and diaphyseal humeral fractures by using the Swedish Fracture Register (SFR).

Methods

In this nationwide observational study from the SFR we analysed data on patient characteristics, injury mechanism, fracture classification and treatment. We included patients aged < 16 years at time of injury with proximal or diaphyseal humeral fracture registered in 2015–2019.

Results

1996 (1696 proximal and 300 diaphyseal) fractures were registered. Proximal fractures were more frequent in girls whereas diaphyseal fractures were more frequent in boys. The median age at fracture was 10 years in both fracture types but patient’s age was more widespread in diaphyseal fracture (IQR 5–13 compared to IQR 7–12 in proximal). In both sexes, the most registered injury mechanism was fall. Horse-riding was a common mechanism of injury in girls, whereas ice-skating and skiing were common mechanisms in boys. Most proximal fractures were metaphyseal fractures. Most diaphyseal fractures were simple transverse or oblique/spiral fractures. The majority of fractures were treated non-surgically (92% of proximal and 80% of diaphyseal fractures). The treatment method was not associated with the patient’s sex. Surgery was more often performed in adolescents. The most common surgical methods were K-wire and cerclage fixation in proximal fracture and intramedullary nailing in diaphyseal fracture.

Conclusion

Following falls, we found sex-specific sport activities to cause most proximal and diaphyseal paediatric fractures. Further studies on prophylactic efforts in these activities are needed to investigate whether these fractures are preventable. The majority of the fractures were treated non-surgically, although surgical treatment increased with increasing age in both sexes.

Trial registration

Not applicable. The present study is a register-based cohort study. No health care intervention had been undertaken.

Glenohumeral joint dislocation is rare in children with proximal humeral fractures: a descriptive study and literature review

Background

Glenohumeral dislocation combined with fracture of the proximal humerus is extremely rare in children, and this study aims to investigate its incidence in the pediatric population and review the treatment strategy for this condition.

Methods

Between Jan 2014 and Jan 2019, 280 patients with unilateral proximal humeral fractures were retrospectively reviewed. Imaging and follow-up notes were reviewed for patients with a predilection for glenohumeral joint dislocation. Six (2.14%) patients between the ages of 5 and 10 years were confirmed as glenohumeral joint dislocation and included in the study. All these patients underwent closed reduction and external fixation under general anesthesia.

Results

Out of 280 patients with proximal humeral fractures, only 6 patients, including 4 males and 2 females, were confirmed as glenohumeral joint dislocation. ROM was normal compared with the contralateral shoulder in every patient at the last follow-up. There was no case of radiological abnormality, including avascular necrosis or devascularization of the humeral head.

Conclusions

Glenohumeral dislocation is a rare entity associated with the proximal humerus fracture in children, with an overall incidence in our case series was 2.14%.

Reduction and stabilization of such injury using an external fixator is a suitable choice for pediatric patients that failed closed reduction.

Proximal Humerus Fractures in the Pediatric Population

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review is to review recent literature focusing on proximal humerus anatomy, epidemiology of these fractures, diagnosis and treatment options, and clinical outcomes.

RECENT FINDINGS

Non- or minimally displaced proximal humerus fractures treated nonoperatively do not lead to short- or long-term complication and do not cross over to operative treatment. There is a higher rate of operative management with older age, increased injury severity score, treatment at an adult hospital, and private insurance. Operative management is preferred with closed or open reduction and percutaneous pinning, but elastic nailing and plate fixation are other options with good postoperative outcomes. Pediatric proximal humerus fractures occur after fall onto the affected shoulder or arm. Diagnosis is usually made with radiographs. Understanding the proximal humerus anatomy is critical to the proper management of these injuries to aid reduction and predict remodeling potential. There is considerable debate around the management of proximal humerus fractures in the pediatric population. Treatment is based on patient age, fracture displacement, and remodeling capacity. Nonoperative management is successful in younger patients or less displaced fractures, and operative management is usually considered in older patients with more displaced fractures.

Efficacies and complications of internal fixations with PHILOS plate and intramedullary Multiloc® nails in the surgical treatment of proximal humerus fractures

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacies of internal fixations with proximal humeral internal locking system (PHILOS) plate and intramedullary MultiLoc^® nails in the surgical treatment of proximal humerus fractures (PHF).

METHODS

A total of 115 patients with PHF admitted to our hospital were selected as the research subjects, and were randomly divided into PHILOS group (n=57) and MultiLoc group (n=58). PHILOS group was treated with internal fixation with PHILOS plate, while MultiLoc group was treated with internal fixation with intramedullary MultiLoc^® nails.

RESULTS

MultiLoc group was superior to PHILOS group in the surgical duration and amount of intraoperative hemorrhage (P < 0.05). At 1 week after surgery, the visual analogue scale (VAS) scores in MultiLoc group were lower than those in PHILOS group (P < 0.05). After surgery, MultiLoc group had a shorter time of occurrence of bony callus and disappearance of fracture line (P < 0.05) and a lower incidence of complications (0.00% vs. 3.51%) (P > 0.05) compared with PHILOS group. At 6 months after surgery, MultiLoc group had higher abduction and external rotation angles and higher scores of Constant-Murley and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) than PHILOS group (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The internal fixations with PHILOS plate and intramedullary MultiLoc^® nails are effective in the treatment of PHF. However, the internal fixation with intramedullary MultiLoc^® nails is superior to the internal fixation with PHILOS plate in alleviating pain and expediting the postoperative restoration of joint function.

Operative choice for displaced proximal humeral fractures in adolescents with open visible physis: A comparative study of external fixator vs. Kirschner wire

BACKGROUND

For adolescents with severely displaced proximal humeral fracture (PHF), surgery is a good choice yielding excellent outcomes, and Kirchner wire (KW) is a cost-effective choice for fixation. Purpose of this study is to compare the clinical outcomes of external fixator (EF) and KW for the treatment of PHF in adolescents.

METHODS

Patients of PHF operated at our institute, from January 2008 to January 2016, were reviewed retrospectively. Demographic data, including sex, age at the time of surgery, operated side, and hardware choice, were collected from the hospital database. Preoperative radiographs were reviewed and classified according to Neer-Horwitz classification. Shoulder function was evaluated at the last follow-up using the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score. Complications, including infection, malunion, nonunion, stiffness of the shoulder joint, and failure of fixation were also recorded.

RESULTS

Thirty-five patients, including 23 males and 12 females, were included in the EF group, whereas 40 patients, including 25 males and 15 females, were included in the KW group (P = 0.867). The average age of patients in the EF group was 13.3 ± 1.7 years, and that of KW was 13.6 ± 1.8 years (P = 0.409). Patients in both groups were followed-up for at least 12 months. The operative time in the EF group (42.4 ± 11.2 min) was significantly shorter than those in the KW group (54 ± 13.6 min) (P < 0.001). The frequency of fluoroscopy in the EF group (12 ± 2.4 times) was significantly less than those in the KW group (17 ± 2.8 times (P < 0.001). The rate of open reduction was significantly higher in KW (35%) group than those in the EF group (0%) (P < 0.001). There was no case of nonunion and malunion in both groups.

CONCLUSION

External fixator is superior to Kirschner wire in the treatment of proximal humeral fractures in adolescents with shorter operative time and lower rate of open reduction with comparable clinical outcomes.

A Single Retrograde Intramedullary Nail Technique for Treatment of Displaced Proximal Humeral Fractures in Children: Case Series and Review of the Literature

Displaced proximal humeral fractures in older children with low remodeling potential need to be reduced and fixed. There are many options for stabilization, including external fixation, rigid internal fixation with screws and plates, percutaneous pinning, and flexible intramedullary nailing. The use of 2 flexible retrograde nails, originated at the University of Nancy, France, became the most popular technique in Europe. The aim of this study was to describe and assess a modified, single retrograde nail technique to treat fractures of the proximal part of the humerus.

Methods

We performed a retrospective monocentric study. From June 2016 to May 2019, a modified retrograde nail technique with 1 prebent nail was used for the management of 21 consecutive children with a closed displaced proximal humeral fracture. Demographic and surgical data were collected. The surgical technique is similar to the classic elastic stable intramedullary nailing, but only 1 nail is used. The average surgical time and perioperative complications were used as criteria for the feasibility of this technique. Radiographs were obtained preoperatively; at 1, 4, and 6 weeks postoperatively; and after implant removal at an average of 4.2 months postoperatively. The clinical outcomes were assessed on the basis of the shoulder range of motion documented in the medical records and by using the French edition of the QuickDASH (shortened version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand [DASH] questionnaire) evaluation scale at the time of implant removal.

Results

Nineteen patients with a mean age of 12.6 years and a mean follow-up of 6 months were included in the study. The mean surgical time was 49 minutes. The single intramedullary nail technique provided a satisfactory reduction of all fractures. No perioperative complication occurred. In 1 case, partial loss of reduction was observed on the first-week control radiograph. All patients had a healed fracture, no deficits, excellent results according to the QuickDASH score, a normal range of motion, and excellent strength of the shoulder joint at the time of implant removal (at a mean of 4.2 months).

Conclusions

The current study confirms the feasibility and efficacy of the single retrograde intramedullary nail technique to treat displaced proximal humeral fractures in children.

Level of Evidence

Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Do pediatric shoulder fractures benefit from surgery?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

We aimed to review considerations, current treatment options, and complications in the management of pediatric proximal humerus fractures.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent literature has shown an increased incidence of operative management of proximal humerus fractures. With increased age, and increased deformity, studies report excellent outcomes after operative treatment. Still, patients under the age of 12 and with Neer grade I and II fractures are consistently treated nonoperatively.

SUMMARY

Indications for operative management of proximal humerus fractures in skeletally immature patients have become increasingly widened. Current literature emphasizes the stratification of patients based on displacement, angulation, and shortening, with overall positive outcomes. Each case should be considered on individual bases, accounting for both radiographic parameters, developmental stages of patients, and potential complications. In the authors' opinion, adolescent patients with Neer Horowitz 3 and 4 fractures surgical management should be considered. In younger patients with nonoperative management, even with significant displacement, is the mainstay of treatment because of the tremendous remodeling potential of the proximal humerus in children.

VIDEO ABSTRACT

http://links.lww.com/MOP/A56.

The impact of COVID-19 on shoulder and elbow trauma in a skeletally immature population: an Italian survey

Background

The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of COVID-19 on the shoulder and elbow trauma in a skeletally immature population in 30 days starting from March 8, 2020, the first day of restrictions in Italy, and to compare it with the same period of 2019.

Materials and methods

All the skeletally immature (younger than 18 years) patients managed in the emergency unit of our hospital between March 8, 2020, and April 8, 2020 (COVID-19 [C19] period), for a shoulder and elbow trauma were retrospectively included and compared with patients with similar ages admitted in the same period of 2019 (no COVID-19 period). Six categories of diagnosis were distinguished: (1) contusions, (2) no physeal fractures, (3) physeal fractures (Salter-Harris), (4) sprains/subluxations, (5) dislocations, and (6) others (tendinitis, wounds, low back pain, and joint inflammation). According to the mechanism of injury, we arbitrarily distinguished 5 subgroups: (1) accidental fall; (2) sport trauma; (3) accident at school; (4) high-energy trauma occurred by car, public transport, and pedestrian investment; and (5) fall from height.

Results

During the C19 period, the number of total accesses in our trauma center steeply decreased: two-thirds less. Regardless of the patient age, we performed 65% less first aid shoulder/elbow services. The number of skeletally immature patients treated at our trauma center for all types of injuries was 350 during the no COVID-19 period and 54 during the C19 period; therefore, the influx of pediatric patients during the C19 period decreased by 84.6%. Furthermore, during the C19 period, (1) there were no cases of fractures, physeal fractures, and dislocations of the shoulder; (2) there were no cases of contusion, physeal fractures, and dislocations of the elbow; and (3) we observed the absence of high-energy, sports, and school injuries; and (4) during the pandemic, shoulder and elbow injuries mainly occurred as a result of accidental fall at home.

Conclusions

The pandemic forced us to become aware of the ways and places where skeletally immature subjects report shoulder and elbow traumas; therefore, it would be desirable that more considerable attention be directed toward the prevention of injury in areas at risk.

Upper Extremity Fractures in Children-Comparison between Worldwide, Romanian and Western Romanian Region Incidence

(1) Background: Fractures represent a significant part of all pediatric injuries, with distal forearm fracture being the most common fracture type in children. (2) Methods: In this comparative, epidemiological study we collected fracture incidence data from the scientific literature and compared it to real-world data extracted from the Romanian national and regional hospital database. In order to collect information on the epidemiology of upper extremity fractures in children, we conducted a systematic literature review on Medline, via PubMed. Extracted incidence data were stratified by fracture location, age or age interval and gender. Nationwide and Western Region incidence values were calculated for different fracture locations of the upper extremity using data extracted from a centralized hospital database. Incidence values were calculated using the mid-2018 census data. The search was restricted to the pediatric population. (3) Results: Incidence values for upper arm fractures nationwide and for Western Region were 54.83/100,000 person-years and 64.79/100,000 person-years, respectively. Forearm fractures had an incidence of 139.77/100,000 person-years and 139.56/100,000 person-years, respectively. The overall incidence of upper extremity fractures nationwide and for the Romanian Western Region were 206.02/100,000 person-years and 220.14/100,000 person-years, respectively. (4) Conclusions: Incidence of upper extremity fractures in the pediatric population varies according to the analyzed data. The calculated incidence depends on the site of fractures, assessed population (worldwide, Romanian population or regional-Western part of Romania) or patients' age.

Tendency towards operative treatment is increasing in children's fractures: results obtained from patient databases, causes, impact of evidence-based medicine

Results of numerous studies assessing the national or the local patient databases in several countries have indicated that the overall rate of operative treatment in fractures, as well as the rate in certain upper and lower limb fractures, has significantly increased in children. The most prominent increase in the rate of operative treatment was observed in forearm shaft fractures.

Results of several survey studies have revealed that there was not a high level of agreement among paediatric orthopaedic surgeons concerning treatment preferences for several children’s fractures.

The reasons for the increasing tendency towards operative treatment are multifactorial and patient-, parent- and surgeon-dependent factors as well as technological, economic, social, environmental and legal factors seem to have an impact on this trend.

It is obvious that evidence-based medicine is not the only factor that leads to this tendency. A high level of scientific evidence is currently lacking to support the statement that operative treatment really leads to better long-term outcomes in children’s fractures. Properly designed multicentre clinical trials are needed to determine the best treatment options in many fractures in children.

Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2020;5:347-353. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.5.200012

A Shift From Non-operative Care to Surgical Fixation of Pediatric Humeral Shaft Fractures Even Though Their Severity Has Not Changed

Introduction: Humeral shaft fractures have traditionally been treated non-operatively due to their good union and low rate of functional impairment. In the recent years, upper extremity fractures and their operative treatment have increased in children. Nevertheless, the trends of humeral shaft fractures are not clear. Materials and Methods: All children aged <16 years, with a humeral shaft fracture in the geographical catchment area of Northern Finland Hospital District, with a yearly child population-at-risk of ~86 000 from the year 2001 until the end of 2015 were included. There were 88 cases, who comprised the study population. Radiographs were available of all. Injury, patient, and treatment characteristics were reviewed from hospital databases. Results: There was an increasing trend of surgical fixation of humeral shaft fractures during the 15 years' study period (β = 1.266, 95% CI 0.17 to 2.36, p = 0.035). However, we found no patient or fracture-related reasons that could have explained the increasing trend of surgical care. Comminuted fracture increased the risk of operative treatment 8-fold (Odds Ratio, OR 7.82, 95% CI 1.69 to 36.3, p = 0.009). Higher age, greater angular deformity or greater diameter of the humerus were not associated with the increased operation risk. Conclusions: The treatment philosophy concerning pediatric humeral shaft fractures has presented a shift from conservative care to surgical fixation. To authors' understanding there is not evidence supporting the increasing rate of osteosynthesis.